NOVANEWS
- social-climbing for nationalists
- ‘In the spirit of humanity!’ –a look at the MV Rachel Corrie
- Goldstone vindicated by flotilla attack as Israel faces another UN investigation
- Obtuse NYT editorial portrays courageous humanitarian mission as human sacrifice
- Israel’s war against non-violence
- ‘Huffpo’ stakes out new frontier in the liberal discourse (Welcome home, Barney!!!!!!!)
- Israel censors the news, again
- Drive-by settlers, and other news
- Did Schwerner, Chaney and Goodman provoke and incite their murderers in Philadelphia, MI?
- Anywhere but here: ‘Haaretz’ prints another Israeli rightwinger talking one-state
|
social-climbing for nationalists Posted: 02 Jun 2010 |
|
‘In the spirit of humanity!’ –a look at the MV Rachel Corrie Posted: 02 Jun 2010 |
|
Goldstone vindicated by flotilla attack as Israel faces another UN investigation Posted: 02 Jun 2010 Richard Goldstone told Newsweek magazine in a May 27th interview that he “doubts” Israel will ever launch another “Operation Cast Lead”-type assault because of the ramifications of his report. Goldstone told Dan Ephron that Israeli military lawyers are “on notice more than they were. If it achieves nothing else, I think it’s worth that.” We can only hope that Goldstone is right. But how many more “Operation Mini Cast Leads” (as Gideon Levy put it) will there be? The Israeli attack on the Freedom Flotilla has vindicated Goldstone’s report and his central claim that Israel used disproportionate force and deliberately attacked civilians in the Gaza assault—just as Israel, albeit on a much smaller scale, did in the massacre aboard the flotilla. Israel is now facing another international, United Nations-led independent investigation of the events that led to the killing of at least 9 people and the injury of dozens more aboard the Mavi Marmara. The U.N. Human Rights Council lopsidedly passed a resolution today that authorizes “an independent international fact-finding mission to investigate violations of international law, including international humanitarian aid and human rights law, resulting from the Israeli attacks on the flotilla of ships carrying humanitarian assistance.” The resolution passed with 32 countries voting in favor, 9 abstaining, and 3 voting against: the United States, Canada and Holland. Once again, the United States has proven that it’s on the wrong side of history. The U.S. ambassador to the Human Rights Council said that the U.S. opposed the resolution because “it creates an international mechanism before giving the responsible government the opportunity to investigate the incident itself.” What a joke. Israel has already had ample opportunity to investigate themselves after the Goldstone report called for independent, impartial investigations, but they have failed. Here’s an excerpt from an April 2010 Human Rights Watch report titled “Turning a Blind Eye: Impunity for Laws-of-War Violations during the Gaza War”:
There’s nothing more to say. This time won’t be different. The Obama administration is completely out of touch with reality. |
|
Obtuse NYT editorial portrays courageous humanitarian mission as human sacrifice Posted: 02 Jun 201 Today the New York Times editorial board weighs in on the disaster at sea. Here’s a brief look at its more notable statements. The editorial leads with the following:
This makes it seem like the flotilla organizers intended to provoke the violent Israeli response. This is a gross distortion of the Gaza Freedom March statement, which accurately noted that Israel was preparing a violent response, and merely tried to foresee a positive outcome whether or not Israel followed through. There is not a shred of evidence that the flotilla organizers intended anything other than humanitarian aid. They forced the issue; either Israel would have to allow the goods to pass through, or it would have to use force to stop it. Both responses would have negative consequences, as Israel would be hard-pressed to justify its interception of humanitarian goods when it was conducting a blockade. Moreover, the organizers no doubt anticipated that any “violent response” by Israel would be similar to the prior Israeli actions against aid ships, such as ramming and crippling one ship and boarding another and arresting all on board. In fact, in the same public statement as the one quoted by the Times, the Gaza Freedom March stated: “Although the first five voyages successfully docked, the last three attempts have all been violently stopped by the Israeli military.” The editorial makes it seem like the courageous souls who ventured on this trip were used, either willingly or unwillingly, as human sacrifices for the purpose of embarrassing Israel. It surely was not expected that Israel would increase its violence a thousandfold and actually execute a number of the volunteers to set an example. The Times continues: “There can be no excuse for the way that Israel completely mishandled the incident.” Mishandled? That eliminates the possibility that Israel deliberately committed murder. One could say that BP has “mishandled” the oil gusher on the gulf coast, because no one suggests that BP intentionally executed the disaster. And it might not be fair to expect the Times to reach the conclusion of pre-planned murder, but it jumps to the opposite conclusion–mistaken judgment. “This is a grievous, self-inflicted wound.” Yes, it is. At least one hopes it will damage Israel’s image. But Israel’s actions are first and foremost a “wound” directed at international humanitarian activists – a lethal wound for at least nine and injuries to dozens of others – and a blow to the million and a half people of Gaza. Israel is saying that these people have no possibility of relief from the crushing blockade, and that it will go to great lengths to prevent concerned people of the world from providing even a small measure of assistance. Did anyone ever suggest that a serial killer committed a “grievous, self-inflicted wound” by embarking on a course of conduct that led to his execution? Aren’t the victims entitled to primary consideration? The Times proposes what it believes are the important questions to be resolved: “Why did Israel, which has blocked some ships but allowed others to pass, decide to take a stand now? Did it make a real effort to find a compromise with Turkey, which sanctioned the flotilla?” One can hardly think of lamer questions. These would be slow-pitched softballs served up to the Israeli PR machine. “Israel has a right to stop weapons from going into Gaza, but there has been no suggestion that the ships were carrying a large cache.” “Large cache?” That suggests that there was at least a “small cache.” There was no “cache” at all. What do the Israelis claim to have found? Knives? There are knives in my kitchen, and no doubt there were knives in the galleys as well. Slingshots? What were those going to be used for? To hurl small stones into Sderot? Not to mention the bigger picture that Israel imports and manufactures billions of dollars per year of the most sophisticated killing machines ever invented, and has no right to complain even if there had been light weapons on board, which there were not. “The Israeli Defense Forces have distributed a video showing that the commandos were attacked. Why weren’t they better prepared to defend themselves without using lethal force?” Once again, the Times buys Israel’s claim that it was attacked and that its mistake was in not being adequately prepared to respond. Then the Times gets to the heart of the matter. “Is the blockade working? Is it weakening Hamas? Or just punishing Gaza’s 1.4 million residents —— and diverting attention away [sic] from abuses by Hamas, including its shelling of Israeli cities and its refusal to accept Israel’s right to exist?” The blockade is a form of collective punishment against a civilian population, illegal under international law. It is not a question of whether or not it is “working.” Collective punishment often works, though in this case it surely is not; when it is effective, it is no less illegal. Moreover, Hamas stopped its shelling of Israel for months in 2008 in compliance with a cease fire, and only resumed when Israel broke the truce on US Election Day. Even then, Hamas offered to reinstate the cease fire if Israel lifted the blockade, and Israel flatly refused. Israel could have terminated the shelling peacefully rather than launching an offensive that killed about 1400 people and cruelly accomplished the almost impossible task of making the people of Gaza even more miserable than they already had been made by the blockade. And what about now? There has been virtually no shelling for over a year, but does Israel lift the blockade? Why does the Times imply that the shelling is ongoing and that it still is a legitimate aim of Israel to stop it? “At this point, it should be clear that the blockade is unjust and against Israel’s long-term security.” That was not clear before? Did the Times previously think the severe restrictions on the amount of day-to-day goods available to the Gazans was “just”? Israel had coldly calculated how much was necessary to keep a million and a half people alive, and decided that any excess constituted “luxury” goods that could be barred from entering the Strip. And now that the Times has seen the light, the principal flaw it finally identifies is damage to Israel’s long-term security. “Hamas is still in charge —— and the blockade has become an excuse for any and all of the government’s failures.” Excuse? In other words, the Times contends that Hamas provides inefficient, ineffective government, and unfairly blames Israel and its measly blockade for its failures. Does the Times get anything right? Sort of, but at the end of the editorial. It properly criticizes Obama’s wishy-washy expression “deep regret” over the incident. Even then, the Times makes it clear this is about Israel, not about the suffering of the people of Gaza and the murderous attack on a humanitarian convoy, as it adds, “He is doing Israel no favors with such a tepid response.” The Times scores again by saying, “Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has shown time and again that he prefers bullying and confrontation over diplomacy. Washington needs to make clear to him just how dangerous and counterproductive that approach is.” Of course, the Times does not suggest that Obama use leverage of threatening or even implementing a reduction in the enormous aid it gives Israel. Instead, he is urged to “back an impartial international investigation,” presumably along the lines of the Goldstone report that the Obama Administration has worked so hard to undermine and bury in oblivion. The Times also proposes that the US join in a Security Council effort to “urge” that Israel lift the blockade. Sure, that will work – urge, persuade, implore Israel to stop its four-year long sadistic siege. While we’re at it, why doesn’t the US “urge” Israel to end the occupation and grant full and equal rights to the non-Jewish citizens of the country? Surely it is not yet time to impose actual pressure from the international community. After all, the US still practiced slavery nearly 90 years after the Declaration of Independence, and openly allowed ethnic discrimination against its citizens for another century. Israel at 62 is still relatively youthful, and prone to adolescent errors. Give it time. A knowledgeable friend of mine emailed me this morning and asked if this was the harshest Times editorial against Israel in our lifetime. Sadly, that might be the case. |
|
Israel’s war against non-violence Posted: 02 Jun 2010 Today, Israel’s Defense Minister Ehud Barak, praising the Shayetet 13 commandos who slaughtered at least nine humanitarian activists on board the Mavi Marmara, said:
A year ago President Obama declared in Cairo:
But if the violence is being committed by Israelis then it is all too evident that this particular world leader lacks the courage and moral conviction to speak out. When the slaves of Zionism are called on to break out of their chains, instead, their own fear of political and financial retribution guarantees that they will maintain their silence. Obama is not only incapable of condemning Israeli violence; he cannot even acknowledge its existence! When unarmed and non-violent Americans are the victims — whether killed, maimed or abused by Israeli soldiers — the government of the nation that proudly describes itself as the most powerful nation on earth has nothing to say in defense of its own citizens. If it wasn’t being used to justify murder, this headline in the Washington Post would be laughably absurd: Israel says Free Gaza Movement poses threat to Jewish state
Radical Islamist groups — the hobgoblins of the Israeli psyche have also enfeebled the judgement of most Americans. Raise the specter of such a threat and the rational mind freezes. This is the psychology of cowardice, where fear becomes omnipresent. Those thus enslaved, cloak their own weakness with fables about the demons they hope to destroy. But their deceit is transparent. This is heroism merely self-declared, visible to no one else. Arrogance and cowardice are the two faces of the fear of fear. Israel’s might is the mask behind which it conceals its own lack of courage — its terror of looking weak. Hours after Israeli commandos were out slaying sea monsters, an Israeli soldier in the West Bank faced the threat of an unarmed American 21-year old. Emily Henochowicz was hit in the face with a tear gas canister fired directly at her by an Israeli soldier during a demonstration at the Qalandiya checkpoint. She is a talented young artist who will now only be able to follow her passion with one eye — the other was removed in surgery yesterday. Does the soldier who shot her believe Israel is now safer? When a state blinds or even kills individuals whose “crime” is their willingness to stand up in defense of justice, what is it that national security is securing? As Robert Fisk duly noted yesterday:
This is cross-posted at Woodward’s site, War in Context. |
|
‘Huffpo’ stakes out new frontier in the liberal discourse (Welcome home, Barney!!!!!!!) Posted: 02 Jun 2010 I have been in despair about the lack of angry response to the flotilla in the American liberal discourse. Well, take heart: at this moment (11), seven of the 25 blogs on the Huffington front page are about Israel and the lame U.S. response; all but one (by Dershowitz) are highly critical of Israel–impressive showing by Zogby, Clemons, others. The contrast with the Times and Washington Post is remarkable. The main Huffpo headline is Barney Frank saying that Does Barney feel he has political cover? Oh wow, this is awesome. Awesome. Celebrate Barney Frank, celebrate the shift. From the Herald:
Liberalism. Coming home. |
|
Israel censors the news, again Posted: 02 Jun 2010 Israel may have botched its raid on the Gaza Flotilla, but it is still successfully deploying its time-honored news management practices — as outlined by the Dutch journalist, Joris Luyendijk, in his impressive book, People Like Us: Misrepresenting the Middle East. The London Financial Times provides its readers with an entire article documenting the Israeli strategy. The reporter, Tobias Buck, explains:
Let’s look and see how The New York Times handled the same story. In my print edition, I had to read down to the 11th paragraph before I discovered,
This is a nice euphemism for “Illegally arresting hundreds of people on the high seas, killing at least 9 of them, detaining the rest unlawfully for several days, and not permitting scores of international journalists who were on the scene to listen to their side of the story.” Eventually, the hundreds of activists will be deported, and start to talk. By then, the cement will have settled around the Israeli story, and if another Goldstone comes along to calmly challenge it, he will be dismissed as anti-Semitic. |
|
Drive-by settlers, and other news Posted: 02 Jun 2010 07:56 AM PDT My “Today in Palestine” news links. Don’t miss the two Palestinian pedestrians killed in the West Bank by Israelis speeding by on settlers-only roads:
Land Theft/Destruction & Ethnic Cleansing Israel deports Palestinian to Gaza, says society Violence and Aggression ACTION Petition: Strip Israel of UN Membership TAKE ACTION Gaza Flotilla March on Saturday June 5th. Assemble Downing Street, London @ 1:30PM Al-Awda Los Angeles, calling for a second demonstration on Friday June 4th @ 4 pm in front of the Zionist Consulate, 6830 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles
Political Fallout Mashaal wants ‘Goldstone report’ on sail Hamas urges states to cut Israel ties, end embargo Full Text of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s Speech Turkey wants US condemnation of Israeli raid (AP) Obama expresses regret over loss of lives (AP) Travel Advisory: Stay Away From Arabs… Irish aid vessel still sailing for Gaza, ‘most serious consequences’ promised if passengers harmed Condemnation across Europe after Israel raid on Freedom Flotilla (The Christian Science Monitor) Democracy Now Interviews Adam Shapiro, Amira Hass, Ali Abunimah and Richard Falk Barney Frank: ‘As A Jew’ I’m ‘Ashamed’ Over Treatment Of Palestinians http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/02/barney-frank-as-a-jew-ashamed_n_597331.html Harman challenger: Top Dem “in the pocket” of AIPAC Experts say Gaza convoy raid may boost militancy (Reuters) http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/mideast/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100602/wl_nm/us_israel_flotilla_militants
Palestinian-Israelis from Gaza Flotilla Face Extended Detention http://www.imemc.org/article/58831
Iran’s Press TV reporter missing after Israeli attack on aid convoy: report http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-06/02/c_13330135.htm
Israelis “humiliated” ship activists: eyewitness http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LDE6511BW.htm MK Regev to Balad’s Zoabi: Go to Gaza, traitor! Huwaida Arraf recounts Israeli attack on Freedom Flotilla Israeli MP’s Terror on Aid Ship: ‘Plan Was to Kill Activists’, Jonathan Cook – Nazareth Gaza boat passenger says Australian photographer electroshocked by Israeli soldiers http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-06/02/c_13329742.htm Expelled activists describe cold-blooded killings (AFP) http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/mideast/*http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100602/wl_mideast_afp/israelconflictgazadeporteesjordan Swedish intellectuals among Gaza flotilla detainees http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=289177 El Cerrito man beaten in assault on Gaza aid flotilla Israelis used bullets and tear gas: Greek activist (AFP) Israelis pointed guns at our heads-Turkish captain Germans on Gaza ship deny Israeli commandos provoked Victoria activist caught in Israeli attack willing to risk his life: friend Flotilla Activist’s Family on Hunger Strike to Demand his Release Why we sailed to Gaza | Lauren Booth Other Flotilla News http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=289111 Activists: We have funding for another larger Gaza flotilla FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: FGM: Update on Israeli attack on Humanitarian Boats Israel navy braced to intercept next Gaza aid ship (Reuters) Tunisians demonstrate to denounce Israeli raid on aid ships Mya Guarnieri: Israeli Left Denounces IDF’s Raid of the Freedom Flotilla Church council condemns flotilla raid Thousands Rally in Los Angeles Against Israeli Flotilla Raid Vermonters mourn the dead of the Memorial Day Massacre on Aid Flotilla to Gaza San Francisco Protests Flotilla Massacre (Part 1: The March) San Francisco Protests Flotilla Massacre (Part 2) Arab Americans protest in Dearborn against Israel’s actions Other Activism/Solidarity/Boycott, Sanctions and Divestment Lessons from the UC Berkeley Divestment Effort Palestinian civil society condemns repression in Canada against Palestine solidarity campaigns and humanitarian efforts Israeli Justification of Crimes/American Support Netanyahu: World criticism won’t stop Israel’s blockade of Gaza Lieberman to UN chief: International community is two-faced for condemning Israel State: Petitions over raid of Gaza flotilla biased Official: US Will Stand with Israel US declines to apportion blame after Israeli raid (AFP) Obscene: Israel should lead investigation into attack on Gaza flotilla, says US Top US lawmaker: No ‘biased’ UN resolution in flotilla raid (AFP) OPT: Gaza hopes Egypt border opening will be permanent http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900SID/AZHU-862GRU?OpenDocument&RSS20=02-P
The colors of racism Political Developments PA factions demand end to proximity talks Haniyeh: Gaza receiving calls of support from Arab world FAIR: Reporting Israeli Assault Through Israel’s Eyes ‘Washington Post’ relies on Israel lobby group for statistical graphic about blockade, Philip Weiss Other News ‘We’re the only ones who believe them’, Ben Smith It’s up to Obama whether the siege of Gaza continues, Paul Woodward Still Think Israel Doesn’t Run the United States? US reaction: Cracks appear in America’s other special relationship U.S. must condemn Israel for ship killings, Amjad Atallah, Special to CNN Israeli raid on Freedom Flotilla shatters key Turkey-Israel ties Israeli aid boat attack ‘has opened world’s eyes to Gaza’s plight’ It’s up to us to lift the blockade, Donald Macintyre The Flotilla attack and Turkey’s views of Palestine We are all Gazans now, Pepe Escobar Will Israel’s attack change anything for Palestinians?, Ian Black Treat Palestinians Like Jews, Robert Scheer http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-scheer/treat-palestinians-like-j_b_597195.html
Murdering Human Rights Workers, MARJORIE COHN America’s Complicity in Evil, PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS Obama’s Timidity and Deaths at Sea, RAY McGOVERN The Mediterranean Massacre, Justin Raimondo The Shadow over Israel, Margaret Atwood Piracy on the Blood-Red Sea, NEVE GORDON http://www.counterpunch.com/gordon06022010.html Notch Up Another Disaster for Israel’s Well-Oiled Propaganda Machine, PATRICK COCKBURN http://www.counterpunch.com/patrick06022010.html 9 Activists Paint-Balled To Death By Israel Rachel Corrie Lives: The Attack On the Aid Flotilla, Ron Jacobs PR Advice to the Palestinians, Matt Barganier Political Cartoons http://voices.washingtonpost.com/anntelnaes/?wpisrc=nl_opinions http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/the-daily-cartoon-760940.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cartoon/2010/jun/02/israel-flotilla-attack-steve-bell Only a one-state Palestine is possible,Christopher King Israel’s Nuclear Policy, James Petras Gideon Levy, can you express yourself freely as a journalist in Israel? Lebanon Iraq’s north says villagers flee Iranian shelling SULAIMANIYA, Iraq, June 1 (Reuters) – Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region said on Tuesday dozens of families had been displaced in days of shelling by Iranian forces pursuing Kurdish rebels in the border region. U.S. and World News Egypt goes to polls, opposition says supporters blocked Saudi youths in trouble over MTV reality show |
|
Did Schwerner, Chaney and Goodman provoke and incite their murderers in Philadelphia, MI? Posted: 02 Jun 2010 Tracking the American liberal discourse’s failure on the flotilla raid, it is important to note that Brian Lehrer, the cerebral conscience of the New York public radio station, WNYC, today did an interview with Rabbi Jonathan Sacks of England on his new book about Jews and Israel. So a conservative Zionist was given a platform to defend Israel’s attack on the boat. (How’d Lehrer have done with the killings of Schwerner, Chaney and Goodman, freedom riders who died in 1963?) Lehrer brought up some good questions. He asked about the inhuman blockade, without quoting the many legal opinions that it is collective punishment. He halfway valorized criticisms of Israel that come from “anti-Zionists” and asked whether these were anti-Semitic. Sacks said it was anti-Semitic when people attack The Jews for supporting Israel. So they take credit for anti-Zionist Jews, as proving diversity, when neither Sacks nor Lehrer gives a platform to an anti-Zionist Jew. No, anti-Zionist Jews and non-Zionist Jews are excommunicated by the Jewish leadership. I challenge you, Brian, if you are bragging on that diversity, to honor it: and let your listeners hear from these people. Amy Goodman does so all the time. She puts on Naomi Klein and Norman Finkelstein. Al Jazeera put me on last week. BBC put me on last month. Russian TV put Norman on yesterday. Lehrer read from a Tom Friedman op-ed today that criticized the Israeli attack mutedly. This is how Lehrer seems to express his own discomfort with the Israeli violence, Tom Friedman. When Israel is in a crisis stemming from a simple fact: the government does not represent half the people who are under its governance. |
|
Anywhere but here: ‘Haaretz’ prints another Israeli rightwinger talking one-state Posted: 02 Jun 2010 Moshe Arens, a rightwing Israeli hawk, has joined Reuven Rivlin, speaker of the Knesset, in endorsing a one-state solution that absorbs the West Bank. At the link, Jerry Haber points out that they want to disgorge Gaza but congratulates the right for thinking outside the box. Arens wrote in Haaretz:
I believe the figure is closer to 2.5 million. But what is exciting about Arens’s statement, following on Rivlin’s, is that the right is thinking creatively about a dire crisis faced by Israeli society. And who else is thinking creatively? Who else is publishing this sort of idea? Certainly not liberal Zionists in the United States, who can’t even call for a return to the ’67 lines to save the Jewish state of ancient memory. The right is actually willing to take action/some risk with enfranchising Palestinians who are now under occupation and tyrannized. The Israeli right is thus far closer to Ali Abunimah’s idea that Israel/Palestine should become a… are you sitting down? …. a democracy. The marvel here is that the Israeli right is doing harder mental work than any American liberal I can think of. And doing so in good measure out of fears of endless bloodshed, lack of progress. The matsav, the conflict, hovers over Israeli society like a black cloud. And over our political life too. How long before American conservatives and realists, who see the apartheid conditions that liberals have blinded themselves to, join this conversation in favor of democracy? I am about to call on Roger Cohen to join this conversation, Roger Cohen who ardently opposed Partition in the former Yugoslavia out of a noble hatred of ethnic division. An essential conversation for Americans, and who will push it. See: www.mondoweiss.net |


