Archive | January 1st, 2011

AFGHANISTAN: MYTHS & FACTS REGARDING OBAMA’S WAR

NOVANEWS

December 30, 2010

by Allen L Roland

President Obama in bomber jacket

 

The number one myth regarding Afghanistan is that we are fighting this so-called war to keep Americans safe. The ugly fact is that we are maintaining this expensive illegal occupation in order to politically promote President Obama’s image as a war time President who is tough on terrorists and thus ensure his re-election in 2012: Allen L Roland   

 

The number two myth about Afghanistan is that this is a war against a virtually nonexistent al-Qaeda.

  •  The fact is that this is a nine year illegal occupation which we continue to support and justify as the leading edge of the war on terror ~ which could not be further from the truth. The so-called war in Afghanistan is now the longest war in U.S. history, and 2010 has seen the highest number of U.S. and NATO soldiers killed.

The number three myth about Afghanistan is there has been significant progress in tamping down the insurgency in Afghanistan.

  •  The fact, courtesy of Juan Cole, ICH, ~ “ A recent National Intelligence Estimate by 16 intelligence agencies found no progress. It warned that large swathes of the country were at risk of falling to the Taliban and that they still had safe havens in Pakistan, with the Pakistani government complicit. The UN says there were over 6000 civilian casualties of war in Afghanistan in the first 10 months of 2010, a 20% increase over the same period in 2009. Also, 701 US and NATO troops have been killed this year, compared to 521 last year, a 25% increase. There were typically over 1000 insurgent attacks per month in Afghanistan this year, often twice as many per month as in 2009, recalling the guerrilla war in Iraq in 2005.” Read more ~

The number four myth about Afghanistan is the US presence in Afghanistan is justified by the September 11 attacks.

  •  The fact is that in Helmand and Qandahar Provinces, a poll found that 92% of male residents had never heard of 9/11.

The number five myth about Afghanistan is Afghans still want US troops in their country, despite their discontents.

  •  The fact is one poll found that 55% of Afghans want the US out of their country. And, the percentage of Afghans who support Taliban attacks on NATO has grown from 9% in 2009 to 27% this year!  Many Afghans regard the Taliban as freedom fighters! The insurgency is actually Afghans resisting their U.S. installed corrupt Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, as well the growing United States occupying force.

 The final myth about Afghanistan is the United States is in Afghanistan to fight al-Qaeda.

  •  The fact, again courtesy of Juan Cole, is “CIA director Leon Panetta admitted that there are only 50-100 al-Qaeda operatives in Afghanistan! The US is mainly fighting two former allies among the Mujahidin whom Ronald Reagan dubbed “freedom fighters” and the “equivalent of America’s founding fathers:” Gulbaddin Hikmatyar and his Hizb-i Islami, and Jalaluddin Haqqani and his Haqqani Network. These two organizations, which received billions from the US congress to fight the Soviets in the 1980s, are more deadly and important now than the ‘Old Taliban’ of Mulla Omar. The point is that they are just manifestations of Pashtun Muslim nationalism, and not eternal enemies of the United States (being former allies and clients and all). Hikmatyar has roundly denounced al-Qaeda.” 

So when you hear President Obama attempt to justify his illegal war and occupation of Afghanistan ~ please realize that this occupation is only serving one master ~ the Military Industrial Complex and Corpocracy and that President Obama answers to them and not you or me.

President Obama has escalated thus senseless occupation in Afghanistan, requesting the Congress hike defense spending next year by two percent to $708 billion and, adds Robert Reich, “including Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs, nuclear weapons, and intelligence, the total national security bill will push $950 billion.”  That’s almost a trillion dollars, folks! Think about that as you watch your gas pump prices climb closer to $4.00 dollars a gallon ~ for billions of dollars are being spent on oil to fuel this out of control Obama war machine.

Afghanistan has rightfully been called the graveyard of empires and it most certainly will be the graveyard of America’s deeply flawed and over-extended empire when the truth replaces myths regarding Obama’s War.

The United States has built a self-deluding narrative and myth of global domination which the world now not only rejects but actively opposes ~ in that regard, Afghanistan will be America’s waterloo. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that, between March and October 2010, the U.N. found that southern Afghanistan remained at “very high risk,” while 16 districts were upgraded to “high risk.” At the same time, Areas deemed “low risk” shrank considerably. The truth is obvious, we are losing badly and it’s time to stop the myths and spin from the Obama administration.

“The weakness of power is that when power is confronted by the authority of truth, it is no match for the power of weakness that bears the mark of truth.” Paul Lehman

Allen L Roland

Freelance Alternative Press Online columnist and psychotherapist Allen L Roland is also available for comments, interviews, speaking engagements and private consultations ( allen@allenroland.com )

allen@allenroland.com is PayPal Verified

Allen L Roland is a practicing psychotherapist, author and lecturer who also shares a daily political and social commentary on his  weblog and website allenroland.com He also guest hosts a monthly national radio show TRUTHTALK on www.conscioustalk.net

Posted in WorldComments Off on AFGHANISTAN: MYTHS & FACTS REGARDING OBAMA’S WAR

FAMILIES BEAR BRUNT OF DEPLOYMENT STRAINS, WAR IS ONLY THE FIRST CYCLE OF VIOLENCE

NOVANEWS

December 30, 2010

by Michael Leon

Most policymakers turn a blind eye, But social scientists are just beginning to document the rippling effects of multiple combat deployments on families — effects that those families themselves have intimately understood for years. A study published in The New England Journal of Medicine in January found that wives of deployed soldiers sought mental health services more often than other Army wives. They were also more likely to report mental health problems, including depression, anxiety and sleep disorder, the longer the deployments lasted.

By JAMES DAO and CATRIN EINHORN in the NYT

WAUTOMA, Wis. — Life changed for Shawn Eisch with a phone call last January. His youngest brother, Brian, a soldier and single father, had just received orders to deploy from Fort Drum, N.Y., to Afghanistan and was mulling who might take his two boys for a year. Shawn volunteered.

So began a season of adjustments as the boys came to live in their uncle’s home here. Joey, the 8-year-old, got into fistfights at his new school. His 12-year-old brother, Isaac, rebelled against their uncle’s rules. And Shawn’s three children quietly resented sharing a bedroom, the family computer and, most of all, their parents’ attention with their younger cousins.

The once comfortable Eisch farmhouse suddenly felt crowded.

“It was a lot more traumatic than I ever pictured it, for them,” Shawn, 44, said. “And it was for me, too.”

The work of war is very much a family affair. Nearly 6 in 10 of the troops deployed today are married, and just under half have children. Those families — more than a million of them since 2001 — have borne the brunt of the psychological and emotional strain of deployments.

Siblings and grandparents have become surrogate parents. Spouses have struggled with loneliness and the stress of single parenting. Children have felt confused and abandoned during the long separations. All have felt anxieties about the distant dangers of war.

Christina Narewski, 26, thought her husband’s second deployment might be easier for her than his first. But she awoke one night this summer feeling so anxious about his absence that she thought she was having a heart attack and called an ambulance. And she still jumps when the doorbell rings, fearing it will be officers bearing unwanted news.

“It sucks that you’re afraid to answer your door,” she said.

Social scientists are just beginning to document the rippling effects of multiple combat deployments on families — effects that those families themselves have intimately understood for years. A study published in The New England Journal of Medicine in January found that wives of deployed soldiers sought mental health services more often than other Army wives. They were also more likely to report mental health problems, including depression, anxiety and sleep disorder, the longer the deployments lasted.

And a paper published in the journal Pediatrics in late 2009 found that children in military families were more likely to report anxiety than children in civilian families. The longer a parent had been deployed in the previous three years, the researchers found, the more likely their children were to have had difficulties in school and at home.

But those studies do not describe the myriad ways, often imperceptible to outsiders, in which families cope with deployments every day.

For Ms. Narewski, a mother of three, it has meant taking a grocery store job to distract her from thinking about her husband, a staff sergeant with the First Battalion, 87th Infantry, now in northern Afghanistan.

For Tim Sullivan, it has meant learning how to potty train, braid hair and fix dinner for his two young children while his wife, a sergeant in a support battalion to the 1-87, is deployed.

For young Joey Eisch, it meant crying himself to sleep for days after his father, a platoon sergeant with the battalion, left last spring. His older brother, Isaac, calm on the outside, was nervous on the inside.

“It’s pretty hard worrying if he’ll come back safe,” Isaac said. “I think about it like 10 or more times a day.”

Joining the Army Life

Soon after Christina and Francisco Narewski married in 2004, he applied for a job with the local sheriff’s office in Salinas, Calif. But he got tired of waiting and, after talking things over with Christina, enlisted in the Army instead.

“We both signed up for it,” Ms. Narewski said. “We knew deployments were going to come.”

That day arrived in the fall of 2007, when their third child was just 5 months old. Ms. Narewski missed Francisco dearly and sometimes cried just hearing his voice when he called from Iraq. But when he returned home in October 2008, it took them weeks to feel comfortable together again, she recalled.

“It’s almost like you’ve forgotten how to be with each other,” she said. “He’s been living in his spot for 15 months. Me and the kids have our own routine. It’s hard to get back to, ‘Oh, you’re home.’ ”

Last April, he left again, this time to Afghanistan. Ms. Narewski, who lives in Watertown, N.Y., thought she was prepared. Her mother came to live with them. She signed up for exercise classes to fill the hours. She and Francisco bought BlackBerrys with instant messaging service so they could communicate daily. And yet.

“I’ve never missed him as much as I do right now,” she said recently. “It doesn’t feel like we’re moving. It’s like you’re in a dream and you’re trying to get something and you can’t get it.”

Not all the spouses back home are women. Tim Sullivan’s days have revolved almost entirely around his two children, Austin, 4, and Leah, 2, since his wife, Sgt. Tamara Sullivan, deployed to Afghanistan in March.

He rises each weekday at 5:30 a.m. to dress and feed them before shuttling them to day care. Evenings are the reverse, usually ending with him dozing off in front of the television at their rented ranch-style house in Fayetteville, N.C.

He has moved twice and changed jobs three times in recent years to accommodate his wife’s military career. But he does not mind being home with the children, he says, because his father was not, having left the family when Mr. Sullivan was young.

“I’m not going to put my kids through that,” said Mr. Sullivan, 35, who handles child support cases for the county. “I’m going to be there.”

He worries about lost intimacy with his wife, saying that they have had a number of arguments by phone, usually about bill paying or child rearing. “She tells me: ‘Tim, you can’t just be Daddy, the hard person. You have to be Mommy, too,’” he said. “I tell her it’s not that easy.”

Yet he says that if she stays in the Army — as she has said she wants to do — he is prepared to move again or even endure another deployment. “I love her,” he said. “I’m already signed up. I made a decision to join the life that goes with that.”

Young Nomads

Isaac and Joey Eisch have also had to adjust to their father’s nomadic life. “I don’t try to get too attached to my friends because I move around a lot,” said Isaac, who has lived in five states and Germany with his father. (Joey has lived in three states.) “When I leave, it’s like, hard.”

When Sergeant Eisch got divorced in 2004, he took Isaac to an Army post in Germany while Joey stayed with his mother in Wisconsin. Soon after returning to the States in 2007, the sergeant became worried that his ex-wife was neglecting Joey. He petitioned family court for full custody of both boys and won.

In 2009, he transferred to Fort Drum and took the boys with him. Within months, he received orders for Afghanistan.

After nearly 17 years in the Army with no combat deployments, Sergeant Eisch was determined to go to war. The boys, he felt, were old enough to handle his leaving. Little did he know how hard it would be.

When Shawn put the boys in his truck at Fort Drum to take them to Wautoma, a two-stoplight town in central Wisconsin, Isaac clawed at the rear window “like a caged animal,” Sergeant Eisch said. He still tears up at the recollection.

“I question myself every day if I’m doing the right thing for my kids,” he said. “I’m trying to do my duty to my country and deploy, and do what Uncle Sam asks me to do. But what’s everybody asking my boys to do?”

Within a few weeks of arriving at his uncle’s home, Joey beat up a boy so badly that the school summoned the police. It was not the last time Shawn and his wife, Lisa, would be summoned to the principal’s office.

The boys were in pain, Shawn realized. “There was a lot more emotion,” he said, “than Lisa and I ever expected.”

Shawn, a state water conservation officer, decided he needed to set strict rules for homework and good behavior. Violations led to chores, typically stacking wood. But there were carrots, too: for Joey, promises of going to Build-a-Bear if he obeyed his teachers; for Isaac, going hunting with his uncle was the prize. Gradually, the calls from the principal declined, though they have not ended.

In September, Sergeant Eisch returned for midtour leave and the homecoming was as joyful as his departure had been wrenching. Father and sons spent the first nights in hotels, visited an amusement park, went fishing and traveled to New York City, where they saw Times Square and the Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum.

But the two weeks were over in what seemed like hours. In his final days, Sergeant Eisch had prepped the boys for his departure, but that did not make it any easier.

“Why can’t we just, like, end the war?” Isaac asked at one point.

As they waited at the airport, father and sons clung to each other. “I’m going to have to drink like a gallon of water to replenish these tears,” the sergeant said. “Be safe,” Isaac implored him over and over.

Sergeant Eisch said he would, and then was gone.

Despite his worries, Isaac tried to reassure himself. “He’s halfway through, and he’s going to make it,” he said. “With all that training he’s probably not going to get shot. He knows if there’s a red dot on his chest, run. Not toward the enemy. Run, and shoot.”

But his father did not run.

‘Dad’ Comes Home

Just weeks after returning to Afghanistan, Sergeant Eisch, the senior noncommissioned officer for a reconnaissance and sniper platoon, was involved with Afghan police officers in a major offensive into a Taliban stronghold south of Kunduz city.

While directing fire from his armored truck, Sergeant Eisch saw a rocket-propelled grenade explode among a group of police officers standing in a field. The Afghans scattered, leaving behind a man writhing in pain. Sergeant Eisch ordered his medic to move their truck alongside the officer to shield him from gunfire. Then Sergeant Eisch got out.

“I just reacted,” he recalled. “I seen a guy hurt and nobody was helping him, so I went out there.”

The police officer was bleeding from several gaping wounds and seemed to have lost an eye. Sergeant Eisch started applying tourniquets when he heard the snap of bullets and felt “a chainsaw ripping through my legs.” He had been hit by machine gun fire, twice in the left leg, once in the right.

He crawled back into his truck and helped tighten tourniquets on his own legs. He was evacuated by helicopter and taken to a military hospital where, in a morphine daze, he called Shawn.

“Are you sitting down?” Brian asked woozily. “I’ve been shot.”

Shawn hung up and went into a quiet panic. He could not tell how badly Brian had been wounded. Would he lose his leg? He called the school and asked them to shield the boys from the news until he could get there.

Outside school, Shawn told Isaac, Joey and his 12-year-old daughter, Anna, about Brian’s injury. Only Isaac stayed relatively calm.

But later, Shawn found Isaac in his bedroom weeping quietly while looking at a photograph showing his father outside his tent, holding a rifle. Shawn helped him turn the photograph into a PowerPoint presentation titled, “I Love You Dad!”

For Shawn, a gentle and reserved man, his brother’s injury brought six months of family turmoil to a new level. Sensing his distress, Lisa urged him to go hunting, a favorite pastime. So he grabbed his bow and went to a wooded ridge on his 40 acres of property.

To his amazement, an eight-point buck wandered by. Shawn hit the deer, the largest he had ever killed with a bow. It seemed a good omen.

A few days later, Shawn flew with the boys, his father and Brian’s twin sister, Brenda, to Washington to visit the sergeant at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. At the entrance, they saw men in wheelchairs with no arms and no legs. Others were burned or missing eyes. Shawn feared what the boys would see inside Brian’s room.

But Brian, giddy from painkillers, was his cheerful self. His right leg seemed almost normal. His left leg, swollen and stapled together, looked terrible. But it was a real leg, and it was still attached to him. The boys felt relieved.

Within days, Brian was wheeling himself around the hospital and cracking jokes with nurses, a green-and-yellow Green Bay Packers cap on his head. While Joey lost himself in coloring books and television, Isaac attended to his father’s every need.

“I feel a little more grown up,” Isaac said. “I feel a lot more attached to him than I was when he left.”

One doctor told Brian that he would never be able to carry a rucksack or run again because of nerve damage in his left leg. Someone even asked him if he wanted the leg amputated, since he would certainly be able to run with a prosthetic. Brian refused, and vowed to prove the doctor wrong. By December, he was walking with a cane and driving again.

For Shawn, too, the future had become murkier. It might be many weeks before Brian could reclaim his sons. But he also knew how glad the boys were to have their father back in one piece.

“Brian came home,” Shawn said one evening after visiting his brother in the hospital. “He didn’t come home like we hoped he would come home, but he came home.”

“Every single day I think about all those families and all those kids that are not going to have a dad come home from Afghanistan,” he said. “That hurts more than watching my brother try to take a step because I know my brother will take a step and I know he’s going to walk down the dock and get in his bass boat someday.”

It was late, and he had to get the boys up the next morning to visit their father at the hospital again. The holidays were fast approaching and the snow would soon be arriving in Wisconsin. Shawn wondered whether he could get Isaac out hunting before the season ended.

Yeah, he thought. He probably could.

Posted in USAComments Off on FAMILIES BEAR BRUNT OF DEPLOYMENT STRAINS, WAR IS ONLY THE FIRST CYCLE OF VIOLENCE

PEACE ACTIVISM: DANIEL ELLSBERG URGES PEOPLE TO SUPPORT VFP

NOVANEWS

December 30, 2010

by Robert L. Hanafin  

Daniel Ellsberg’s message to Support VFP

This message was sent into Veterans Today by the Peace Activist group Veterans for Peace.

Posted on behalf of VFP by Bobby Hanafin, Veterans Issues and Peace Activism Editor, Veterans Today News Network

Veterans Today (VT) is a network of 63 web sites that service the U.S. Military Family and Veterans Community

With over 390,000 plus unique visitors per month bringing in over 22,000,000 page hits, VT’s growing into a dynamic interactive network of information, service, and product sites serving U.S. Military Veterans, and their families. Created in 2004, Our “Veterans Today” brand name is growing and gaining mass acceptance.

December 29, 2010

Most people became aware of me because of the Pentagon Papers. Since then, I have become known as “The Most Dangerous Man In America”.

And why?

Because I spoke the truth.

I was convinced that the American public should know the truth about the Vietnam War.

I continue to work to bring the truth to light. On December 16th 2010, in a Veterans For Peace sponsored action, along 131 other people, I was arrested for attempting to chain myself to the White House gate. This was done in protest of American involvement in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I am a proud member of Veterans For Peace.

I challenge you to join me and VFP and speak the truth to your family, friends, neighbors, and anyone that will listen. They need to know the truth about how our military is devastating the very countries that we have self-righteously proclaimed to save.

We are destroying Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan in the same way that we devastated Vietnam.

Agent Orange dispersed in Vietnam still lingers in the ground contaminating soil and food. Live bombs and mines continue to harm innocent men, women and children.

Today we are leaving depleted uranium weapons scattered throughout Iraq and Afghanistan that will have devastating ecological consequences for both people and ecosystems for years to come.

The True Cost of War Is not measured in dollars spent on guns, nor on enemy combatants killed. The True Cost of War is visible in the catatonic face of a PTSD sufferer, in the lifeless body of a veteran who has committed suicide. The cost can be heard in the cries for help of the tortured, the stomach growls of hungry abandoned children on the streets of Iraq and Afghan villages.

It can be felt at home in smaller budgets for schools and in homes that seem emptier because a father or mother has been deployed and is away from home during the holidays. The True Cost of War is that it strips us of our humanity, spoils nature’s splendor, and ruins people’s lives.

I challenge you to join the local VFP Chapters across the country. Become informed and participate in their projects. It is important that we support Bradley Manning and Julian Assange who are being persecuted for telling the truth about the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. When we work together we can make a difference.

I believe that VFP is one of the most credible organizations you can support.

We have no alternative but to work for peace.

Daniel Ellsberg

PS Make a gift to ensure that VFP can continue to speak the truth for the next 25 years!

Veterans For Peace, 216 S. Meramec, St. Louis, MO 63105, 314-725-6005       www.veteransforpeace.org

Veterans For Peace appreciates your generous donations. We also encourage you to join our ranks.

Veterans Today Video links to 16 Dec 2010 War Protest at the White House:

Veterans for Peace White House Civil Disobedience to End War

Veterans for Peace Message to Obama 12/16/2010

Mike Prysner Protests Obama\’s Wars

Posted in USAComments Off on PEACE ACTIVISM: DANIEL ELLSBERG URGES PEOPLE TO SUPPORT VFP

THE 2010 ”ARE YOU SERIOUS?” AWARDS

NOVANEWS

December 30, 2010

by Michael Leon

 

The Harry Potter Award to the British technology company ATSC Ltd for its invention of a “wand” that, according to the company, detects explosives, drugs, and human remains for up to six miles by air and three fifths of a mile by land. The ADE 651 sells for $16,000 a unit.

By: Conn Hallinan  in  Foreign Policy in Focus

The only problem is that it doesn’t work, which users might have figured out by reading the manual: the device has no batteries or internal parts. It is powered by “static electricity” generated by the holder walking in place. A wand-like antenna then points to the drugs, bodies, or explosives.

This past January ATSC Ltd was charged with fraud and banned by the British government. One ATSC source told the New York Times, “Everyone at ATSC knew that there was nothing inside the ADE 651,” and that the units cost only $250 to make.

But the wand was widely used in Iraq. Ammar Tuma, a member of the Iraqi parliament’s Security and Defense Committee, bitterly attacked the company for causing “grave and massive losses of the lives of innocent Iraqi civilians, by the hundreds and the thousands, from attacks we thought we were immune to because we have this device.” The Iraqi Ministry of the Interior purchased 800 ADE 651s at a cost of $85 million.

The managing director of ATSC, Jim McCormack, staunchly defended the wand, which he claims the company has sold to 20 countries. He did admit, “one of the problems is that the machine looks primitive,” and said the company was turning out an upgraded model “that has flashing lights.”

Runner-up for this award was the British firm, Global Technology Ltd, which sold $10 million worth of very similar wand—the GT 200—to Mexico. The unit retails for $20,000 apiece. In one demonstration the GT 200 detected drugs in a Volkswagen sedan. After thoroughly searching the car, authorities turned up a bottle of Tylenol (suggesting that one should switch to Advil). Human Rights Watch says it is “troubled” by the use of the wand, which is widely used in Thailand and Mexico. “If people are actually being arrested and charged solely on the basis of its readings, that would be outrageous,” the group said in a press release.

A Mexican interior official defended the GT-200, however, claiming that it “works with molecules.” Hard to argue with science.

The Golden Lemon Award goes to the Conservative government of Canada for shelling out $8.5 billion to buy 65 Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth fighters. According to Defense Minister Peter MacKay, “This multi-role stealth fighter will help the Canadian forces defend the sovereignty of Canadian airspace.” Exactly whom that airspace is being defended from is not clear.

The contract also includes a $6.6 billion maintenance agreement, which is a good thing because the F-35 has a number of “problems.” For instance, its engine shoots out sparks, and no one can figure out why. It is generally thought a bad idea for an engine to do that. There are several different types of F-35, and the vertical lift version of the aircraft doesn’t work very well. It seems the fan that cools the engine, doesn’t, and the panels that open for the vertical thrust, don’t. Also switches, valves and power systems are considered “unreliable.”

The F-35 is looking more and more like the old F-105 Thunderchief, a fighter-bomber used extensively at the beginning of the Vietnam War. Pilots nicknamed it the “Thud” (the sound the plane made when it hit the ground after failing to clear a runway, a rather common occurrence). One pilot said it had all the agility of a “flying brick,” thus its other nickname: the “lead sled.”

The U.S. is spending $382 billion to buy 2,457 F-35s, although the price tag keeps going up as more and more “problems” develop. Maintenance and spare parts for the aircraft will run several hundred billion extra.

One normally thinks of Canadians as sensible, but the country’s Conservative government is apparently as thickheaded as our own. Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently had a summit meeting on the Arctic and didn’t invite the Inuit (whom most Americans call Eskimos).

Well, the F-35 may not fly very well, but it works just fine for Lockheed Martin: second quarter profits saw a jump from $727 million to $731 million over last year, and revenues rose to $11.44 billion, 3 percent over last year.

The Panjandrum Award to the U.S. military in Afghanistan. For those unfamiliar with the “Great Panjandrum,” it was an enormous rocket-propelled explosive wheel developed by Great Britain for breaching the Atlantic Wall that Nazi Germany had built on the French coast to defend against amphibious invasions. Tested on a Devon beach, it roared ashore, turned smartly to port, and thundered into a bevy of admirals and generals, scattering them hither and yon. Thus “Panjandrum” became a metaphor for really silly military ideas.

And there is not a whole lot sillier idea than the one to deploy M1-Abrams tanks in southern Afghanistan. The M1 is a 68-ton behemoth, powered by a jet engine (miles per gallon is not its strong point). Since Afghanistan has virtually no roads and a good deal of the terrain is vertical—at least the part where the insurgents are ensconced—how the M1 is going to get around is not obvious.

However, one U.S. Marine officer told the Washington Post, “The tanks bring awe, shock and firepower. It’s pretty significant.” Right. Show the Wogs a tank and they will be begging for mercy.

Except the Taliban are quite familiar with tanks. The initial Soviet invasion included 1,800 of them, many of them T-72s. The T-72 is admittedly smaller than the Abrams—41 1/2 tons vs. 68 tons—but the former actually packed a bigger gun. The M1 sports a 120mm gun, the T-72 a 125 mm gun. T-72 carcasses are scattered all over Afghanistan, and the Taliban even managed to capture some of them.

Tanks are effective against stationary targets and other tanks. The Taliban don’t have tanks, and they don’t stick around when one shows up. But shocked and awed by their appearance? Don’t these people read history? Try “The Bear Went Over the Mountain: Soviet Combat Tactics in Afghanistan,” by Lester Grau.

The George Orwell Award to the U.S. Defense Department for dropping the name of “Psychological Operations”—“Psyops” for short—because the “term can sound ominous.” Instead Psyops will now be known as Military Information Support Operation, or MISO, which sounds like a Japanese soup.

Some military contractors, however, apparently didn’t get the memo about using names and acronyms that sound “ominous.” Northrop Grumman just successfully tested a radar system that will be attached to Predator and Reaper armed drones to allow the killer robots to “detect individuals walking over a wide area” and track vehicles, watercraft, people, and animals, as well as “stationary targets of interest.” Given that the drones pack Hellfire missiles and 500 lb. bombs, you really don’t want to be “interesting” when they are around.

The news system is called the “Vehicle and Dismount Exploitation Radar” or “Vader” for short. Sound of heavy breathing are not included in the basic package.

The Rudyard Kipling Award to the Pentagon and its program to train officers for extended service in Afghanistan. For those unclear on this award, a few lines from Kipling’s poem, “Arithmetic on the Frontier” about Britain’s unsuccessful effort to subdue Afghanistan, and how one adds up the cost of occupation:

A scrimmage in a Border Station–
A canter down some dark defile—
Two thousand pounds of education
Drop to a ten-rupee jezail*—

It appears some officers read Kipling. In spite of a high profile push by the Defense Department to recruit officers to serve in Afghanistan, the program is less than half filled, according to Pentagon officials.

*A jezail is a cheap, muzzle-loading rifle that took a heavy toll on British troops during their 19th century invasions of Afghanistan.

The Barn Door Award to the Department of Defense (yes, yes they do win a lot, but then they excel at winning awards) for telling employees and contractors not to read Wiki Leak documents online, because they are “classified.” Just close your eyes?

The Air Force went one step further and barred personnel from using computers where the documents were online, thus underlining conventional wisdom in Washington: the Army is slow, the Marines are dumb, the Navy lies, and the Air Force is evil.

The Mary Wollingstonecraft Shelly Award (the author of Frankenstein) goes to the University of California at Berkeley, MIT, and Cornell University for using Defense Department money to turn the beetle, Mecynorrhina torquata, into a cyborg. The beetle is fitted with an electronic backpack attached to the animal’s wing muscles, allowing scientists to control the beetle’s flight path.

The idea is to use the little beastie (actually, as beetles go, kind of a big beastie) to crawl or fly into areas where the “enemy” is. Once the “enemy” is identified, the military can target the area with bombs, rockets or artillery. This is a tad rough on the beetles.

According to researchers Michael Maharbiz and Hirotake Sato, the long-term goal is to “introduce synthetic interfaces and control loops” into other animals. “Working out the details in insects first will help us avoid mistakes and false starts in higher organisms, such as rats, mice, and ultimately people. And it allows us to postpone many of the deeper ethical questions about free will, among other things, that would become more pressing if this work took place on vertebrates.”

The Michele Bachmann Award to Australian legislator Bob Katter for sounding the alarm about a serious threat facing his constituents: “We have terrible problems with deadly flying foxes. They are going to kill more people than the Taipan snake in Australia.”

The flying fox is the world’s largest bat, also called the “fruit bat.” It has broad, flat molars and feeds on soft fruit, from which it extracts juice. By all accounts they are gentle and intelligent and don’t attack humans. The Taipan snake, which can grow up to 12 feet, is considered the most venomous land snake in the world. However, the animal is shy and rarely bites people.

It is comforting to know that there are other legislators in the world just as wacko as U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn), who recently suggested that legislators “slit their wrists in a blood pact” to block health reform and said that people had to be “armed and dangerous” to block efforts to mitigate global warming.

You can read more of Conn Hallinan’s writings at Dispatches From the Edge. 

Posted in USAComments Off on THE 2010 ”ARE YOU SERIOUS?” AWARDS

THE ENEMY WITHIN

NOVANEWS

December 30, 2010

by Jeff Gates

 

The Enemy Within

The phrase “enemy within” brings to mind the image of a shadowy spy stealing military secrets. That was the case for Israeli master spy Jonathan Pollard jailed for 1980s espionage that compromised U.S. Cold War strategy.

That phrase also describes those involved in a form of psy-ops that is not easily detected because it operates so brazenly. For instance, the well-timed release of diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks displaced reports of Israeli obstinacy in peace talks with reports of a need for war with Iran.

That operation relied on editors at four major newspapers chosen by WikiLeaks to manage the releases. Despite the delight at their impact voiced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, mainstream media failed to mention the possibility of undisclosed bias by those who chose what to release and when.

The bias of The New York Times is well known. Less clear is the role of Ian Katz, Deputy Editor at The Guardian(London) and Executive Editor Sylvie Kauffman at Le Monde in Paris. The geopolitical success of the WikiLeaks operation suggests an enemy within.

Israeli duplicity often operates through what U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates describes as “the people in between.” When waging unconventional warfare, those people are the most dangerous combatants, particularly those operatives in mainstream media.

The People in Between

For systems of governance reliant on informed consent, nothing could be more perilous. The “people in between” routinely target media—freedom’s greatest vulnerability—as a means for displacing facts with what a targeted populace can be deceived to believe.

How old is this duplicity? How long have false beliefs been used to manipulate behavior? Modern technology—particularly media—enables deception on a global scale. Between the American populace and the facts they require to protect their freedom—that’s where this enemy within imbeds its operatives.

The false intelligence claiming Iraqi WMD was a people-in-between operation. Judith Miller at The New York Timesfed us a steady diet of front-page news that we now know was fixed around Israeli goals promoted by Ahmad Chalabi, a London-based Iraqi expatriate who, like Israel, sought regime change in Iraq.

Pentagon insider Richard Perle developed Chalabi over two decades. A Jewish Zionist, Perle has long been a strategically well-placed “person in between.” Miller left The Times and joined Fox News and then Newsmax.

Yet the impact of complicit media pales in comparison to the enemy within that brought the U.S. economy to its knees and undermined national security at its financial core.

Imbedded Inside

The most devastating in this chronicle of enemies is the most difficult to see. As with other “in between” operations, this too succeeds by displacing facts with false beliefs. Only in this case, those beliefs were imbedded in education and over decades worked their way into law.

Known as the “Washington Consensus,” this widely shared perspective shapes economic policy worldwide. At the heart of this generally accepted truth is found the belief that money should be accountable only to itself.

In this mindset, financial freedom is an article of faith. Instead of the civil rights refrain, “Let my people go,” its proponents insist: “Let my money go.” Allow money the freedom to work its will worldwide and everything will work out fine.

That shared belief works “in between” in the same way that Jonathan Pollard undermined national security, WikiLeaks shifted attention to Iran and Judith Miller induced us to war in Iraq. Only in this case a false belief has been so thoroughly internalized that it’s difficult to see because this shared mindset has become that with which we have been educated do our seeing.

A Global Sanhedrin

The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund are the primary apostles of this consensus faith. The World Trade Organization (WTO) now seeks to take this belief to global scale by enforcing unrestricted free trade not only in goods and services but also financial capital.

The WTO operates like a global Sanhedrin akin to a Jewish high council accountable only to itself. What’s now emerging as a global enemy within is a finance-guided form of transnational governance marketed as free trade but accountable only to itself.

That ‘self’ traces its origins to an internalized mindset in which financial freedom serves, by consensus, as a proxy for personal freedom. That mindset was decades in the making.

This modern-day Mindset Warfare is being waged by an enemy that is truly within. Fast globalizing financial forces now induce us to freely embrace the very forces that undermine our freedom.

By waging war on us from the inside out, the originators of this money-myopic mindset dismantled the U.S. economy, enabled vast financial pillaging and induced us to fiscal ruin.

Those wielding this weaponry operate from our internal shadows as the Zionist entity within.

Jeff Gates is author of Guilt By Association – How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. See www.criminalstate.com

Posted in USAComments Off on THE ENEMY WITHIN

THE BAGHDAD CATHEDRAL MASSACRE: ZIONIST FINGERPRINTS ALL OVER

NOVANEWS

December 31, 2010

by Jonathan Azaziah

www.maskofzion.com

Prior to the fascist, destructive, genocidal US-UK-Israeli occupation of Iraq, Sunni and Shia, Muslims and Christians, Arabs and Kurds lived together in a harmonious atmosphere of brotherhood and unity that paralleled that of occupied Palestine before the Zionist occupation in 1948. It is egregious. Disgusting. Despicable. Ignorant. Absurd. And erroneous on every factual basis to assert that the aforementioned ethnic and religious groups are now massacring each other, when in reality, they are being massacred by the murderous occupation armies.

Dividing Iraq via partition and driving it into a hell of ethnic cleansing was a Zionist plot that was originally designed in 1982 by Israeli foreign policy advisor Oded Yinon (1). The policies for destabilizing Iraq were reestablished in the ‘Clean Break’ papers written for mass murderer Benjamin Netanyahu by Zionist spy Richard Perle and several Zionist war criminals including Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, Meyrav Wurmser and Robert Loewenberg (2). Agents of the international terrorist group known as Mossad have been operating in Iraq as early as the 1950s, when the Zionist entity engaged in a false flag campaign of terror against the Iraqi-Jewish community (3).

It has always been the absolute goal of the illegitimate usurping entity to destroy Iraq as a nation, so it can bring its ‘Greater Israel’ dream to fruition, settling its colonial extremists on the banks of the ancient Tigris and Euphrates rivers.

The bloody travesty of humanity that occurred on October 31st, 2010 which left 58 Iraqis dead in the Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral in Baghdad (4) was not the work of Al-Qaeda. The gunmen didn’t belong to Islamic State of Iraq. The homicidal shooters weren’t even Iraqi. The best way to honor the victims of senseless violence is to expose the truth of the attack. And the truth is, this massacre has Zionist fingerprints all over its blood-drenched structure.

SITE Intelligence: Mouthpiece of Mossad

As the events that led up to the massacre unfolded, the Zionist mainstream media reported that an Al-Qaeda offshoot known as Islamic State of Iraq was behind the horrors. The media obtained its reports from an organization known as SITE Intelligence Group (5). SITE is the primary source that the falsehood-spewing Zionist media, Zionist-designed Homeland Security, and even the FBI and CIA obtain their information from regarding Muslim and Arab affairs (6).

When Israel is accused of a crime, SITE says otherwise and the media follows SITE’s lead. When SITE says Muslims commit a crime, the media follows SITE’s lead as well. SITE is controlled by Rita Katz, a former soldier in Israel’s Occupation Forces who has close ties to Mossad via her working relationship with Mossad agent Ben Venzke’s Intel Center (7), as well as the FBI (8). Katz, who comes from a deep-rooted Zionist family and whose father was executed in Iraq due to his spy activity for the Zionist regime, has admitted to disseminating false information to the United States government itself about ‘Jihadists,’ Al-Qaeda, and other ‘Islamic extremist’ groups (9).

Rita Katz collaborated with fellow Zionist Jane Harman, by delivering testimony on ‘Islamic terrorists’ using the internet as a weapon, before a congressional committee so the ardently pro-Israel congresswoman could pass Orwellian legislation to monitor anti-Zionist and anti-war activism online (10). Katz violated the privacy of hundreds of Muslim-Americans in their mosques, community centers and other social functions by illegally spying on them on behalf of the US government, and is currently being sued by several organizations (11).

The former Israeli soldier is considered to be a protege of Zionist Steve Emerson (12), the notorious xenophobic propagator of Islamophobia, whitewasher of Zionist crimes against Palestinians and Lebanese and creator of the repulsive propaganda film, ‘Jihad In America (13).’ Rita Katz’s SITE organization has even been endorsed by the bloodthirsty killers at Blackwater, now known as XE (14), who are responsible for civilian murders across occupied Iraq, including the infamous massacre at Nisour Square (15).

Rita Katz is an ultra-Zionist who clearly works as an asset for the Israeli-invented ‘war on terror’ which has claimed millions of lives in occupied Arab and Muslim lands already. Her lies have affected Iraq directly, as she has attempted to sow division through spreading lies about the long-dead CIA asset Osama Bin Laden and the Shia population of the occupied nation (16). She is a noxious propagandist whose words, writings and actions are completely immersed in unequivocal falsity for the benefit of the usurping Tel Aviv regime, and whose SITE organization is an utter fraud and obvious front for Mossad. Only the oblivious, the deaf, dumb and blind would be unable to see through her lies.

Islamic State Of Iraq Doesn’t Exist

Al-Qaeda doesn’t exist. It should be reiterated for emphasis: Al-Qaeda. Does. Not. Exist. Even the atrociously pro-Israel apologist news agency known as BBC has admitted this undeniable fact through a documentary it released, in which CIA agents admit that the ‘terror’ organization is a sheer fabrication (17). The aforementioned Zionist propaganda outfit SITE Intelligence Group has reported Islamic State of Iraq is linked to Al-Qaeda. But if Al-Qaeda doesn’t exist, how can Islamic State of Iraq be linked to it?

The answer is simple: Islamic State of Iraq doesn’t exist either. Something that exists can’t be linked to something non-existent; such notions are the peak of illogic and preposterousness. The US military itself, most saliently a Brigadier General, have already declared that the leader of the so-called Islamic State of Iraq, Omar al-Baghdadi, is an invention (18). The officials went on to declare that they needed to give an ‘Iraqi face to a foreign-run terrorist group.’ Typical.

SITE is an Israeli intelligence dummy company. Al-Qaeda and Islamic State of Iraq are Zionist-concocted fallacies. The question remains then: Who carried out the heinous massacre that martyred 58 and injured 78 others at Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral?

Karada: Crawling With Israeli Agents and Mercenaries

The Karada district of Baghdad where the Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral is located, a mixed neighborhood of Sunni, Shia, and Christians, has faced atrocity after atrocity by the invaders since the savage Zionist occupation began. In March of 2008, Karada was rocked when twin IEDs detonated and murdered 68 innocents, and injured 150 others (19). In September of 2008, Karada was shaken to its core when five car bombs and IEDs exploded and claimed the lives of 27 innocents and injured 84 more (20). Earlier this year, in January, a car bomb rattled Karada and 18 lives were taken along with 80 more people being injured (21).

In the summer of 2009, the churches of Karada were slammed repeatedly, including a triple IED attack in July that murdered 4 innocents and injured 20 others (22).

As is the case with every bombing, kidnaping, robbery, rape, assault and murder in occupied Iraq, not a single suspect was taken into custody by the malicious Western forces of the US and UK, nor the puppet forces of the disgraceful Iraqi regime. All of the blasts in Karada (as well as everywhere else in Iraq) were the products of IEDs and car bombs. The Zionist media propagates a ridiculous theory that the car bombs are the work of ‘Islamic militant’ suicide bombers, and that the IEDs are explosives made from scratch by the same militants. This is an insult to anyone with a functioning brain.

The sophisticated and destructive force of an IED, as well as the meticulousness and strategic placing of car bombs throughout Iraq, especially in Karada, can only be the work of one group in the world: the Mossad (23).

In late September of 2003, a private military contractor named Zapata Engineering began operating in occupied Iraq with a $200 million contract from the Pentagon; its function was to destroy unusable Iraqi munitions and store usable munitions in American safe houses (24). Zapata Engineering received another contract for over $32 million in February of 2004 from the Army Corps of Engineers (25).

The relationship between the US occupying army and Zapata turned sour in 2005 however, when 19 of its employees were arrested by Marines after firing on American checkpoints (26). The Zapata contractors were carrying illegal weapons, which the US military identified as anti-tank weapons (27). The weapons identified were the rifles of Rafael Advanced Systems Limited, the chief weapons manufacturer of the Zionist entity (28). When the Marines took the Zapata employees into custody, the detainees claimed they were humiliated and the Marines ripped their religious medallions off of their necks; the symbol on those religious medallions was the six-pointed star found on the flag of the Zionist entity (29).

Under the microscope, Zapata Engineering is exposed as a Zionist company with offices in North Carolina, Hawaii and Tel Aviv (30). Zapata has a partnership with Rafael in the production of IEDs, with Rafael making the IEDs (many of which are equipped with depleted uranium tips) as well as the neutralization technology which it sells to the US (31), and Zapata manufacturing the triggers (32). Israeli occupation forces were even called into Iraq by high-ranking American generals to help the US ‘combat’ the ‘problem’ of IEDs (33).

These IEDs are powerful enough to lift a 70-ton tank clear off of the ground and pierce military-grade armor; the Iraqi Resistance has noticed the high level of sophistication of these killing devices, and has made it clear that no Iraqi group has the capability to assemble such devices, although foreign intelligence and secret service agencies do (34). Though Zapata Engineering is no longer officially operating in Iraq, its Rafael Advanced Systems-linked IEDs are; wreaking havoc every single day on the innocents of occupied Iraq.

It is vital to point out, that prior to the horrific Western occupation that began in 2003, car bombs weren’t detonating in Iraq. But after March 20, 2003, like the Zionist IEDs, car bombs have become a nearly-everyday occurrence that Iraqis have been forced to cope with due to the illegal and barbarous occupation. It would be a monstrous mistake to link these attacks to anyone other than the occupiers that brought this savage madness down on the ancient head of Iraq.

Contrary to Zionist hasbara, and the garbage spewed from the mouths of US-puppets within the Iraqi regime, the car bombs aren’t the work of ‘suicide bombers;’ they are the work of Mossad, working intimately with occupation forces (35). In fact, the car bomb has become the signature of the Zionist regime when carrying out assassinations and terror operations. The car bomb is the weapon it admitted to using to murder Lebanese Resistance Commander, the martyr Imad Mughniyeh (36).

The Zionist entity used the car bomb to murder former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, as exposed by Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (37). It is the weapon that the sanguinary usurping regime used to assassinate a Resistance fighter in illegally blockaded Gaza last week (38). It is the weapon that the Mossad used to murder Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Muhammad Baqir al-Hakim, a fierce critic of the US occupation (which wasn’t in line with the disgusting and traitorous nature of his family), in the massive bombing at the Imam Ali Mosque in Najaf that martyred 125 innocents in addition to the Ayatollah (39). And it is the weapon that has been used in an ongoing assassination campaign against Iraqi policemen and security forces (40); exactly the way IOF trained the US special forces to operate, as well as participating in the death and destruction themselves by posing as consultants (41).

It is not a coincidence by any means, that just months after the illegal occupation of Iraq began, an Israeli Center of Middle Eastern Studies was opened in Baghdad. Several Iraqi professors were sickened at the establishment of a Zionist entity satellite in the Iraqi capital, and they said in no uncertain terms that it was a Mossad front (42). Muslims and Christians united against this Mossad haven, and resisted steadfastly in a refusal to cooperate with the Zionist entity and the US (43).

A week after the opening of the Israeli Center, the UN headquarters in Baghdad was destroyed by Mossad with CIA assistance (44). Mossad has been caught traveling throughout Baghdad in armored SUVs (45). Four Zionist agents were killed by the Iraqi Resistance in 2005, when they were uncovered stealing archaeological artifacts and planting car bombs (46). The evidence is astonishingly overwhelming that Mossad has swarmed Iraq, Baghdad in particular, with its IEDs and car bombs to transform Iraq into a fractured state; Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khameini, the Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, has stated that Washington D.C. and Tel Aviv are the ‘root causes of all terrorist operations in Iraq (47).’

Not only is Karada riddled with parasites from the illegal occupier of Palestine, it is riddled with mercenaries and private contractors; United States-backed guns for hire, usually ex-military, who shoot with impunity and sign on to have no mercy whatsoever. Karada has been assaulted by United Resources Group, who murdered two innocent Iraqi women in 2007 (48). It has been attacked by Almco, when mercenaries inside four convoys opened fire on civilians and wounded an Iraqi woman named Roba Taha (49).

The residents of Karada have been terrorized by none other than the infamous Blackwater, now known as Xe (50). Dyncorp has its headquarters in Central Baghdad (51), just moments away from Karada, and its mercenaries have terrorized all of Baghdad, most notably shooting an Iraqi taxi driver dead in November of 2007 (52). As of 2009, there were over 132,000 private military contractors operating in Iraq (53), with membership across 27 private military companies (54).

Karada, a place where religious groups lived amongst each other peacefully, has been bombarded by agents of the Zionist entity, mercenaries and foreign occupiers from all angles since 2003. The fingerprints of Tel Aviv and private military contractors are revealed when the deconstruction of the official Zionist media story is brought forth and the false flag attack on the Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral is uncovered.

The Massacre, The Aftermath and Maliki’s Cover-Up

It’s disturbingly typical that the dreadful bloodshed in Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral began with the so-called ‘militants’ detonating a car bomb and four IEDs before storming the church and taking hostages (55).

A three hour bloody struggle followed before Iraqi security forces cut off the lights and entered the church to subdue the murderers and rescue the hostages. 41 Christians inside the church including 2 priests were slaughtered; 12 policemen died in the gun battle; and 5 innocents were murdered by the car bomb and the IEDs.

Though American occupation forces immediately issued a statement that they were at the scene only as advisors to provide reconnaissance, intelligence and surveillance, several eyewitnesses and a journalist noticed at least three US soldiers wearing assault gear outside of the church as well as American helicopters on Sunday night (56).

Iraqi security forces arrested five suspects and while they claimed that only some of them were not Iraqi (57), eyewitness accounts show that none of them were Iraqi, as none of them spoke Arabic in an Iraqi dialect nor with an Iraqi accent; the suspects spoke the classical form of the language which made it impossible to detect where they’re from (58). In addition, the Iraqi authorities investigating the massacre discovered 6 foreign passports; three from Yemen, three from Egypt (59). Iraqi officials further discovered, that the assailants were able to pass through the occupier’s security checkpoints because they were dressed up as mercenaries of foreign contracting companies (60), and in addition to the passports, they were carrying fake ids (61).

War criminal, US-puppet and traitor Nouri al-Maliki immediately identified the tragic events as the work of Al-Qaeda and laughingly identified himself as an ‘honorable Iraqi’ who was horrified by the incident (62). There is nothing honorable about selling out your own countrymen to invaders; al-Maliki is a disgrace to the Iraqi people, and instead of protecting the innocents being butchered by Zionist bombs and barbaric American oppression tactics, he would rather protect George Bush from being hit with a shoe. Al-Maliki used the massacre at the Karada cathedral as a pretext to shut down Al-Baghdadia newspaper; a publication that was providing live, eyewitness courage of the events unfurling and more importantly, that has given the Iraqis themselves a voice to criticize the occupation and the government’s collaboration with it (63).

Only two logical, intelligent theories could arise from the evidence presented: The shadowy assailants that stormed the Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral and perpetrated the massacre weren’t dressed as private military contractors and actually were private military contractors, employed by one of the agencies aforementioned; or the massacre was the sinister work of Mossad. The former theory is frail, private military contractors are hired guns, not the orchestrators of complicated false flag operations; the latter theory however, is perfectly plausible, and as the Lebanese Resistance movement of Hezbollah recently observed in a statement condemning the massacre, ‘The crime has all of the Zionist hallmarks in a Zionist scheme based on fragmenting the region into feuding entities in order to dominate it (64).’

Mossad has the ability to duplicate any passport of any nation with the technology located in an Israeli military base at Petah Tikvah; first quality passports, second quality passports and fake identifications are produced in this facility for all international operations (65). The most recent case of Mossad using fabricated passports to carry out its murderous operations would be its assassination of Hamas commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai (66). Knowing Arabic has been a prerequisite to becoming a Mossad agent (and a CIA agent for that matter) for quite some time (67), and that is why to this very day, the corrosive Israeli terrorist group advertises in Israel for Arabic-speaking linguists (68). The usage of a car bomb and IEDs were damning enough to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the masked men were Mossad.

It eclipses the highest peak of inanity to believe that US occupation forces that had a security check point near the cathedral, along with helicopters hovering over the cathedral and the surrounding area to conduct reconnaissance, allowed ‘Islamic militants’ to carry out ‘martyrdom’ operations and take hostages before any official knew a thing about it. The US won’t even allow children through a checkpoint without searching them and violating them, is it reasonable to think it would allow mercenaries armed to the teeth through one without a security check? Nonsense.

As the late Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah remarked not too long before his passing, all violence in Iraq is linked to the ‘occupation,’ he said ‘the Zionist entity operates through its intelligence and political influence to keep Iraq divided (69).’ America’s military allowed the attackers through that checkpoint, because it was collusive in the incoming attack, as it always is. Though there is no direct evidence that the gunmen were Israeli, all of the circumstantial evidence points in only one direction as to where they came from: the usurping supremacist regime of Tel Aviv.

A Theory Based On Logic And Facts

The October 31st attack on the cathedral in the Karada district of Baghdad was a false flag operation carried out by the Mossad terror organization, with aid from the US occupation forces and collusive elements within Iraq’s puppet security forces. The attack against the Iraqi Christians was meant to look like a hit from ‘radical Islamists to sow discord and division amongst Muslims and Christians and ravage the relative peace that Karada’s people have experienced despite the illegal occupation, sending one more part of Iraq into absolute chaos. Using Israeli-designed ordnance and firepower, the Mossad agents were given access to the church by US forces and protected from above by American helicopters; this cover allowed them to unleash hell upon the innocents within Sayedat al-Najat Cathedral for hours before being brought to a halt by Iraqi security forces.

Carrying documents made in an Israeli intelligence stronghold in occupied Palestine, the Mossad operatives left behind Egyptian passports to perpetuate the illusion of ‘Islamic extremists,’ as well as passports from Yemen to give further solidarity to the Zionist Obama administration’s plot to invade the gulf state based on lies. The agents were taken into custody to complete the fraudulent operation and their identities were concealed from the press, and of course, it will remain that way.

Seeking an American push in the stalemate of the disgusting sham Iraqi elections, al-Maliki weighed in by attributing the attack to Al-Qaeda despite a total lack of evidence, and with the blessing of the US, al-Maliki shuts down a newspaper that has been a thorn in the side of his puppet administration and the occupier for years. 58 innocents dead. 78 injured. No mention of Mossad, Israel or even American complicity in the crime by any Zionist media organization. Islam slandered again. Iraq’s blood spilled once more. The murderers not brought to justice. The families of the martyrs angry, confused and bewildered. Zionist mission accomplished.

Conclusion: Sectarian Division or The Illusion Of It?

One of the worst tragedies of the Iraqi genocide is the near extermination of Mesopotamia’s ancient Christian community; their systematic decimation is barely mentioned at all. It is shameful.

The Chaldean Christians have been under violent assault from Mossad operatives and Christian Zionist mercenary groups in Nineveh, Irbil, al-Hamdaniya, Bartella, Talasqaf, Batnaya, Bashiqa, Elkosheven, Aqrah, and Mosul (70). US officials were advised by their Israeli overlords that the Christian population of Iraq was instrumental in the fight against the British and its puppet monarchy prior to the July 14th Revolution of 1958; they were advised that the elimination of the Christians as an anti-occupation entity would be just as instrumental, which is why the US set up a puppet army of 200,000 men, nearly completely comprised of ‘Shia,’ to be led by CIA death squads to ravage the Christian population completely (71).

While the CIA and its puppet army of traitors terrorized Iraq’s Christian civilians, Mossad launched a campaign of mass killing against Iraq’s intellectuals, murdering 530 scientists and academics, several of whom were Assyrian and Chaldean Christians. The majority of the intellectuals had their lives taken in Baghdad universities and the universities in the southern Iraqi province of Basra (72). Hunter-killer operations continue against the Christians of Iraq at this very moment; Less than two weeks after the Sayedat al-Najat massacre, five Christians were murdered and twenty others were injured on November 10th. The bombings that claimed the innocents’ lives were linked to ‘Sunni militants,’ but further scrutiny of the incident reveals that a dozen roadside bombs were the cause of the mayhem (73). Roadside bombs are also known as IEDs; IEDs equal Mossad.

Muslims across the Middle East, especially in Iraq itself, have shown their solidarity with their Christian brothers and sisters while Zionist Western nations have encouraged them to leave their ancestral land. This division needs to be rejected; it is another Zionist plot to fractionalize Iraq.

‘Sunni’ officials that once served as Saddam Hussein’s closet advisors have been tapped by the State Department and the CIA to carry out covert operations team to track down Shia Resistance movements and obliterate them; this team was formed into an intelligence agency called the General Security Directorate, and it was led by traitor and butcher Iyad Allawi (74). The US also armed several ‘Sunni’ militias to target the predominantly Shia Iraqi police force as well as weaken the Iraqi Shia Resistance fighters clashing with US occupation forces in Baghdad (75).

The CIA set up another puppet intelligence group comprised of ‘Sunni’ officials from Saddam’s regime to crack down on Shia and Sunni Resistance in Samarra, a city holy to the Shia, respected by the Sunni, and inhabited peacefully and brotherly by both (76). Maliki’s ‘Shia’ police forces, at the behest of the American occupier cracked down on Shia Resistance within Baghdad, massacring hundreds of innocent Iraqi Shia (77).

The US provided arms and massive amounts of funds to the Sons of Iraq, a ‘Sunni’ militia, that fought against Sunni and Shia Resistance across the occupied nation (78). The US created another ‘Shia’ militia, the Zulfiqar Army, to neutralize Muqatada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army, and it brutally killed dozens of Sadrist officials (79). The ‘Shia’ Badr Organization has been a willing and even happy partner of the US occupation; they have not only been deeply involved in the arrest, torture and killing of Sunni Resistance fighters but the Shia Resistance as well, most prominently the Mahdi Army, who had many of their fighters massacred by Badr in 2006 (80).

The Kurdish military organization Peshmerga is another willing and happy collaborator in the illegal US occupation of Iraq and has launched deadly attacks on all of Iraq’s Resistance fighters, Sunni, Shia and secular. Peshmerga is fully trained, armed and financed by the Zionist entity, and several private Israeli companies operate in Iraqi Kurdistan, providing consultation and intelligence to the Kurdish collaborationists (81).

Grand Ayatollah Ahmad al-Husseini al-Baghdadi, a fiery critic of the American and Israeli occupation of Iraq, as well as the puppets and traitors currently running the Iraqi government issued statements in an interview 3 years ago that are crucial to understanding so-called sectarianism; the Ayatollah remarked that when the American occupiers were faced with an increase in the Iraqi Resistance, they established collaborationist death squads to be led by US intelligence in order to discredit the real Iraqi Resistance (82).

When a US-backed, US-financed ‘Shia’ organization murders a Sunni, it isn’t Shia killing Sunni; it isn’t sectarian violence, it is the US killing Sunni. When a US-backed, US-trained ‘Sunni’ militia murders a Shia, it isn’t Sunni killing Shia; it isn’t sectarian violence, it is the US killing Shia. When an Israeli-armed, US-supported Kurdish security squad murders an Arab, it isn’t Kurd killing Arab; it isn’t killing based on ethnic hatred, it is the US killing Arabs. When US-backed, US-financed, Israeli-armed ‘Muslim’ groups kill Christians, or ‘Christian’ groups kill Muslims, it isn’t Muslims killing Christians or Christians killing Muslims; it isn’t sectarian violence, it is the US and Israel murdering Muslims and Christians.

When the CIA-backed, CIA-trained, repressive dictator Saddam Hussein brutally oppressed the Shia of Iraq for decades, including the savage torture and murder of Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr and his sister, Sayyeda Amina Bint al-Huda (83), it wasn’t sectarian violence; it was US-sponsored state terrorism. And when the US-backed, US-financed ‘Shia’ puppet government tortures and murders Sunni dissenters, it isn’t sectarian violence; it is US-sponsored state terrorism. These ‘sectarian’ organizations don’t just kill innocents from outside of their own ‘sects’ and ethnic groups; they kill whoever criticizes the occupation and the puppet regime and whoever their American masters tell them to kill. The regimes are authoritarian and totalitarian, not sectarian.

All of these groups take their orders from Task Force 121, the elite CIA death squad that has been operating in occupied Iraq since 2003 (84) and Mossad; the crimes of these Iraqi traitors pale in comparison to the toxic crimes of the US and Zionist occupiers, but their cancerous collaboration has contributed greatly to the destruction of Iraq.

There are those who claim to stand with the oppressed; who claim to have the best interest of Iraq at heart while preaching nothing but disgusting, hateful, prejudicial propaganda and Zionist-designed sectarianism, directing the attention on the crimes committed in Iraq towards certain ethno-religious groups instead of the Zionist, American and British criminals that murdered 1.5 million innocent Iraqi men, women and children. Never mentioned by these abhorrent persons are the declarations of the Iraqi people in 2003, “We are brothers, Sunni and Shia, we are not selling our homeland (85).” Never mentioned by these debauched hate-mongers are the Sunni and Shia who stood united in Baghdad one year after the occupation to inform the occupier that its ‘divide-and-conquer’ strategy failed miserably (86).

Never mentioned by these amoral, self-anointed geopolitical rejects are the thousands of Shia who gave blood to their Sunni brothers who had just been appallingly besieged by the American occupier in Fallujah (87). Never mentioned by these undignified, deliberately vicious lunatics is the massive support shown to Iraqi Shia Resistance leaders by Iraqi Sunnis during what the brutal occupier labeled an uprising (88). Never mentioned by these shameful peddlers of prejudicial propaganda are the men, women and children of a unified, Sunni-Shia Iraqi Resistance group fighting together due to the strong faith that links them all (89).

Never mentioned by these pathetic, fraudulent loudmouths are the more than 300,000 Iraqi Sunni and Shia that gathered in Baghdad in a jointly organized affair by al-Sadr movement and the Association of Muslim Scholars to protest the occupation and debunk myths of disunity in Iraq (90). And never will it be mentioned, by these ignominious, untruthful and useless idiots, that Shia and Sunni stood together once more to lend their support to the desecrated Iraqi Christian community (91).

A select few collaborationist groups do not equate to ‘sectarian’ violence when the nearly perfect majority of the civilian population stands together against the occupation; these groups equate to Zionism and they are the stooges in its plot to cripple Iraq irrevocably. All of Iraq’s ethnic and religious groups have suffered unimaginable, unspeakable and genocidal pain and suffering since the Zionist occupation of Iraq began (92); that must never be forgotten. The Israeli, British and American annihilation of Iraq must never be forgotten.

Do not say that you are against sectarianism when you spread sectarianism. Your gargantuan hypocrisy is legendary and unbelievably easy to detect, analyze, deconstruct and expose for the asinine hot air that it is.

It is a foregone conclusion that the conservative xenophobes, liberal propagandists and Zionist hasbara experts will crawl out of the woodwork and blame the Sayedat al-Najat tragedy on sectarianism and ‘volatile’ religious tensions. This tactic is a tired one that has been used consistently by the Zionist monsters for decades. It is used to portray the Arab and Muslim peoples as barbarians; as animalistic savages who kill each other over petty ethno-religious differences and minuscule territorial disputes. It is the chief asset in their dehumanization campaign which has been in effect since Zionist meddling in the Middle East began over a century ago. It is the very peak of vileness; the pinnacle of the most malicious of falsehoods. There is no sectarian division in occupied Iraq; simply the mere illusion of it. In reality, the only sectarianism that exists when discussing the occupiers and the indigenous people that they occupy, is the sect of the oppressors and the sect of the oppressed.

May Iraq, the land of prophets, saints, martyrs, scholars, poets, mathematicians, dignified women and righteous men be freed of all oppressors; foreign and homegrown alike.

~ The End ~

Sources:

(1) A Strategy For Israel In The Nineteen Eighties by Oded Yinon

(2) Israel Crosses The Line by Justin Raimondo; The Israel Lobby And US Foreign Policy by Stephen Walt and John Mearshimer

(3) Ben-Gurion’s Scandals: How The Haganah And The Mossad Eliminated Jews by Naeim Giladi

(4) Death Toll Rises To 58 In Baghdad Church Attack by Xinhua News Agency

(5) Priests Among 46 Christians Killed In Iraq Hostage Drama by Khalil Murshadi, Yahoo! News

(6) Is Israel Controlling Phony Terror News? by Gordon Duff and Brian Jobert, Veterans Today

(7) Bin Laden Is Dead; Long Live ‘Bin Laden’ by Maidhc O Cathail

(8) Terror Watch: How Clarke ‘Outsourced’ Terror Intel by Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff, Newsweek

(9) Private Jihad: How Rita Katz Got Into The Business Of Inventing Muslim Terrorists And Hystericizing America by Benjamin Wallace-Wells, The New Yorker

(10) Using The Web As A Weapon: The Internet As A Tool For Violent Radicalization And Homegrown Terrorism by Federation of American Scientists

(11) The Terrorist Hunter Speaks by Kathryn Jean Lopez, National Review

(12) Mideast Analysis, Fast And Furious by Robert F. Worth, The New York Times

(13) First Amendment Or Israel First by Mohamed Khodr

(14) Contrived Propaganda Tapes Reveal War On Terror Fraud by Paul Joseph Watson

(15) Two Years After Nisour Square Massacre, Blackwater Still Armed And Dangerous In Iraq by Jeremy Scahill

(16) Osama’s Olive Branch To Shi’ites by Rita Katz and Josh Devon, Boston Globe

(17) The Power Of Nightmares: The Rise Of The Politics Of Fear by BBC

(18) US Says Iraqi Rebel Head Is An Invention by Tina Susman, The Sydney Morning Herald

(19) Baghdad Sees Rise In Number Of Corpses by Agence France-Presse

(20) Holiday Bombings Kill 27 In Baghdad by Sam Dagher and Muhammed al-Obaidi, The New York Times

(21) Karada Blast Casualties Rise Further; 18 Killed, 80 Wounded by Aswat al-Iraq

(22) Casualties From Church Attack Rise To 25 by Aswat al-Iraq

(23) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah

(24) Marines Jail Contractors In Iraq by David Phinney

(25) Iraq: Civilian Contractors Working For US Make A Bundle To Destroy Munitions by Kevin Begos and Phoebe Zerwick, Winston Salem Journal

(26) Marines Detained 19 US Contractors After Gunfire by Rick Jervis, USA Today

(27) Iraq: Tension And Confusion Between Troops, And Contractors On The Battlefield by Josh White and Griff Witte, The Washington Post

(28) Israeli Snipers Kill US Troops In Iraq by Joanna Francis

(29) The Bizarre Case Of Zapata Engineering, Murdered US Marines and Iraqi IEDs by Greg Bacon

(30) Iraq IEDs: Mossad/Zapata Engineering Conspiracy by Cloak and Dagger

(31) Israel To Sell Armored Vehicles To The US by Al-Alam News Channel

(32) Israeli Made IEDs and US Zapata Engineering Made IED Triggers Are Killing US, Canadian And NATO Soldiers by The NB Gazette/PRESS Core

(33) America’s S.O.S. To The IDF by Amir Oren, Haaretz

(34) The Zionist Occupation Of Iraq Is ‘The War In Iraq’ by Christopher Bollyn

(35) Exposed – The Zionist Strategy To Balkanize Iraq by Christopher Bollyn

(36) Israeli Secret Agent Assassination Claim by Sky News; ‘Israel Benefitted Rafiq Hariri Murder’ by Press TV

(37) Sayyed Nasrallah: Israel Behind Hariri’s Assassination by Hussein Assi, Al-Manar

(38) Israel Claims Assassination In Gaza by Ma’an News Agency

(39) Traces Of Mossad Agents In Najaf Blast by Mehr News Agency

(40) More Assassinations Across Iraq by Timothy Williams, The New York Times

(41) Israel Trains Assassination Squads In Iraq by Julian Borger, The Guardian

(42) Israeli Center Opened In Baghdad by Kamel al-Sharqi

(43) Iraqi Muslims Did Not Blow Up Christian Churches by Sam Hamod

(44) Analyst Sees CIA And Mossad Hand Behind UN Office Blast In Baghdad by Mehr News Agency

(45) Video Shows Attack On ‘Israeli Mossad SUV’ In Baghdad by CBS News

(46) Resistance Bomb Kills Zionists Stealing Archaeological Artifacts by Al-Basrah, translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr

(47) Khameini Accuses ‘US And Zionist’ Intel. Agencies Of Involvement In Blasts by Aswat al-Iraq

(48) Many Iraqis Want Security Firms Out by Mark Kukis and Ali al-Shaheen, Time Magazine

(49) Shots Fired From Convoy Set An Iraqi Mob To Action by Sudarsan Raghavan, The Washington Post; Investigation Unveils Attempt To Kill In Karada Shooting Incident by Aswat al-Iraq

(50) Innocents Killed By Corporate Mercenaries In Baghdad by Simon Assaf, Socialist Worker Online

(51) DynCorp Criticized For Employee Deaths by Tod Robberson, The Dallas Morning News

(52) DynCorp Security Guards Shoot Taxi Driver Dead in Baghdad by Deborah Haynes, The Times/The Sunday Times

(53) Only In Name? by Daryoush Bavar, Press TV

(54) Iraq: Security Companies And Training Camps by Sarah Meyer, Brussels Tribunal

(55) Iraqi Christians Mourn After Church Siege Kills 58 by Barbara Surk and Lara Jakes, Associated Press

(56) US Forces Deny Taking Part In Raid On Baghdad Church by Khalil Murshadi, Agence France-Presse; Assyrian Organizations Condemn Church Massacre by Jeremy Reynalds, The Cypress Times

(57) Iraqis Mourn Victims Of Massive Attack On Church by Compass Direct News

(58) Grenades In Church by The Economist; Hostages Taken In Baghdad Church by BBC News

(59) Killers Carried Egyptian, Yemeni Passports by Australian Assyrian News

(60) ‘Iraq Church Gunmen In Mercenary Outfit’ by Press TV

(61) Iraq Probes Church Raid; Says Attackers Disguised by Waleed Ibrahim, Reuters

(62) Al-Qaeda Claims Iraq Church Attack by Al-Jazeera English

(63) Iraq Shuts Al-Baghdadia After Bloody Church Attack by Committee To Protect Journalists

(64) Hezbollah Condemns Attack On Church: Zionist Hallmarks Are Clear by Al-Manar

(65) By Way Of Deception: The Making Of A Mossad Officer by Victor Ostrovsky

(66) Mossad Has A History Of Using Fake Passports (And Sometimes Being Caught) by Anthony Loewenstein

(67) Bombs, Terrorism And Manure by Gordon Duff, Veterans Today

(68) Mossad, Mossad – Coming Soon To A Town Near You! by Tariq Saeedi, The Baluchistan Post

(69) Fadlallah From Lebanon: Iraq Blasts Linked To Occupation by Aswat al-Iraq

(70) Israel Hopes To Colonize Parts Of Iraq As ‘Greater Israel’ by Wayne Madsen

(71) The US War Against Iraq: The Destruction Of A Civilization by James Petras

(72) Mossad Murdered 530 Iraqi Scientists by Al-Jazeera English and Dr. Ismail Jalili

(73) Iraq’s Christians Terrorized By Wave Of Bombings by Barbara Surk and Hamid Ahmed, Associated Press

(74) Iraq’s Spy Service Planned By U.S. Team To Stem Attacks by Dana Priest and Robin Wright, Washington Post

(75) U.S. Arming Sunnis In Iraq To Battle Old Al Qaeda Allies by John F. Burns and Alissa J. Rubin, The New York Times

(76) Annals Of National Security: Moving Targets Page 4 by Seymour Hersh, The New Yorker

(77) To Save Iraqi Democracy, Bush’s War Will Now Target Shias Too by Muqtedar Khan

(78) The Iraq War’s Other Contractors by Carol Burke, Consortium News

(79) Factions: Iraq’s Mysterious Vigilante Killers by Simon Robinson, Hassan Fattah and Meitham Jasim, TIME Magazine

(80) Badr Groups Move From Troubled Past To Uncertain Future by Brian Conley

(81) Corrosive Israeli Mossad In Iraqi Kurdistan by Imad Khadurri; Mossad And Peshmerga by Imad Khadurri

(82) Resistance, Not Terror: An Interview With Grand Ayatollah Ahmad al-Husseini al-Baghdadi by The Asia Times

(83) Sayyid Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr by Islamic Insights

(84) Annals Of National Security: Moving Targets Page 1 by Seymour Hersh, The New Yorker

(85) Introduction To The “Salvador Option” And Iraq’s “Death Squads” Part 2 by Brussels Tribunal

(86) The Roving Eye: One Year On: From Liberation To Jihad by Pepe Escobar, The Asia Times

(87) Fury Ignites Solidarity In Iraq by Naomi Klein, The Los Angeles Times

(88) Iraqi Unified Resistance by Source Watch

(89) Why Elections Won’t Quell Iraqi Resistance by Molly Bingham, The Boston Globe

(90) Media Disinformation And Nature Of The Iraqi Resistance by Ghali Hassan

(91) Iraq’s Christians Vow To Survive – With Muslim Help by Nizar Latif and Charles McDermid, Yahoo! News

(92) Another Baghdad Massacre: Iraqi Christians Are Already At Home by Ramzy Baroud

Posted in WorldComments Off on THE BAGHDAD CATHEDRAL MASSACRE: ZIONIST FINGERPRINTS ALL OVER

THE ZIONIST MURDERERS OF IRAQ

NOVANEWS

 

December 31, 2010

by Jonathan Azaziah

“…retired Israel intelligence offier, Shmoel Avivi has been the primary weapons dealer for ‘terrorist groups’ in Iraq since 2005 …as of November 2009, 950 Israeli agents were stationed in Kirkuk and are rumored to have a bomb-making facility there…”

www.maskofzion.com      

It has been 20 years since the murderous sanctions of the supranational police force known as the UN were implemented in Iraq. These sanctions claimed over 1.5 million innocent lives including more than 500,000 children by starving them to death. It has now been over 7 years, since the Zionist-instigated, Zionist-designed, Zionist media-enforced occupation of Iraq began, and as of this moment, 1.5 million more innocent Iraqis have been slaughtered.

That’s 3 million human beings. Dead. In twenty years time. And these are only the casualties reported. All news files use the phrase “at least” preceding every description of how many are dead after a bombing, a shooting or a missile strike. There are martyrs whose names will never be known, whose faces will never be seen, whose stories will never be told.

Devastation, Pollution And Crimes Against Humanity

In addition to the legacy of rape, murder and destruction, the terrorist armies of America, Britain and their allies have turned Iraq into a toxic wasteland by leaving behind 1,700 tons of depleted uranium (which doesn’t include what was left in the first Gulf War), 5,000 tons of other hazardous waste materials, and over 14,5000 tons of contaminated oil and soil tainted by the oil. Basra, in Southern Iraq, has been devastated by depleted uranium. Fallujah, in Western Iraq, has been torn apart by white phosphorus and mark-77, including 133 of its gorgeous mosques.

The diseases contracted from exposure to these weapons of mass destruction are now more exuberant than Hiroshima and Nagasaki after Zionist Harry Truman dropped Zionist J. Robert Oppenheimer’s atomic bomb. Babies are stillborn. People die of cancer and other unknown infections from the WMD-affected areas daily. Mothers and fathers commit suicide due to what has been done to their children. Crops are irrevocably damaged. Water is undrinkable. Those who eat or drink have a high-risk chance of getting sick also. These horror stories are never told either. These are casualties never counted.

The utter devastation of Iraq has turned over 5 million Iraqis into refugees, internally and externally, and 5 million children into orphans. Tens of thousands of Iraqi girls and women have been victimized by Kurdish-Israeli gangsters who have criminal sex rings all across the Middle East from the Zionist entity to Turkey to Syria, after they turned to prostitution as a way to support their families (1). The child mortality rate in Iraq has skyrocketed 150% since 1990, when the deathtrap of UN Resolution 661 was integrated into world policy. Only 50% of school-age children are attending class.

Despite being the ancient land of the eternal Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, 70% of Iraq’s people have no access to water. 80% have no access to sanitation. 70% of Iraqis are unemployed, and 43% live in horrendous poverty (2). 5,800 Iraqis are detained in US prisons, overt and covert, for absolutely no reason, with absolutely no evidence, and 30,000 more Iraqis are being detained by the treasonous puppet government with no charges against them in the most inhumane conditions (3). These are undisputable facts. Now the questions are: Who are the criminals behind 20 years of atrocities? And why did they perpetrate such horrible, ungodly crimes against humanity?

A Zionist Plot

Attributing the desecration of Iraq to such generalities as “corporatism” or “imperialism” is baseless and unequivocally cowardly. Corporatism and imperialism are not living, breathing entities which determine the affairs of mankind. There are individuals behind every action of corporate greed and imperial interests. They have names. They have affiliations. And in the case of the illegal invasion, occupation and subsequent genocide against Iraq, every individual involved is a Zionist of Khazarian or Anglo extraction with dual loyalty to the despicable, criminal, illegitimate state of Israel.

A 1982 document entitled “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties,” written by Oded Yinon, an Israeli foreign policy advisor, appeared in a World Zionist Organization journal, and it describes the Zionist plot to destabilize Iraq and separate it into three states: a Sunni State, a Shia State, and a Kurdish state, before fulfilling the delusional Talmudic prophecy of annexing those lands as a part of Greater Israel. Whenever the Zionist media mentions strife in Iraq, it always describes it as ‘sectarian,’ even if there is no evidence of sectarian strife.

 This propaganda has been designed by neo-conservative policy makers and commentators from pro-Israel think tanks like Kristol Jr., Kristol Sr., Krauthammer, Pipes and his racist father, Cohen, Goldhagen, Frum (Bush’s speech writer), Lewis and Rubin to portray Iraqis as savages, and as animals, who not only hate Americans but each other as well, to dehumanize them so the American masses are brainwashed to think of them as such and support the illegal war.

The traitor and former CIA asset Ahmed Chalabi is at work with a company owned by Zionist criminal Zeev Belinsky to construct a wall in Baghdad to separate Sunni and Shia communities in another scheme to create Iraqi disunity (4). It has been mentioned by several US politicians including self-proclaimed Zionist Joe Biden, that the only solution to the ‘conflict’ in Iraq is to break it up into nation states. Sunni, Shia, Kurd, and Assyrian lived together peacefully in brotherhood before the criminal US-UK invasion. Nation states aren’t necessary. Only an end to the occupation is. That must not be forgotten.

A 1996 document entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” was written by Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, Meyrav Wurmser and other Zionist agents for current Prime Minister of the usurping Zionist entity, mass murderer Benjamin Netanyahu. This document saliently featured the removal of Saddam Hussein and the weakening of Iraq as a cornerstone for Israeli success and domination of the region. Richard Perle and Douglas Feith would later become high-ranking officials in the Pentagon for George Bush’s criminal administration, and they were instrumental in the orchestration of the unlawful occupation of Iraq.

In 1998, a bill was signed into law by the butcher of Bosnia, war criminal Bill Clinton entitled “The Iraq Liberation Act” which made ‘regime change’ in Mesopotamia an important aspect of US foreign policy, and it was this felonious legislation that was cited prior to the invasion on March 20, 2003. It was co-authored by Zionist monster Joe Lieberman and banking shill John McCain.

Instability And Disunity Bred By Israel

These three documents were what the Zionist puppetmasters of Bush and Cheney used as reasoning to destroy Iraq. Zionist Philip Zelikow, the criminal behind the ridiculous 9/11 Commission Report, admitted that Iraq had been invaded for Israel’s protection (5), as did Marine General Anthony Zinni (6), and Senator Fritz Hollings (7). Zionist Paul Wolfowitz, a chief architect of Iraq’s plight, vehemently advocated torture and executions of Iraqi prisoners, and it is due to his lunacy, that 900 Iraqis sit on death row waiting to be killed, despite being convicted of crimes with no evidence. Wolfowitz encouraged the genocidal army to set up concentration camp-type prisons to break the Iraqis’ spirit of Resistance (8). Wolfowitz was also responsible for bringing in Mossad and Shin Bet advisors to train US assassination hit squads in 2003. 

He has openly confessed that this was a war of aggression that he helped foment. Why has no court prosecuted this maniac? Zionist Stuart Levey was a key official in the Treasury Department that appropriated additional war funds to the US military. The Pentagon derived its false intelligence for the war from the Office of Special Plans, controlled by Zionists Douglas Feith and Abram Shulsky, which was supported by liar Donald Rumsfeld, and usual suspects Elliot Abrams and Wolfowitz. Feith and Wolfowitz conducted seminars for the US military that focused on torture-interrogation, that should be used by the troops to humiliate any Iraqi that was detained (9). It was this training that led to the horrors in Abu Ghraib prison.

Douglas Feith’s former law partner, L. Marc Zell, formed an alliance with nephew of aforementioned Iraqi traitor Ahmed Chalabi, Salem Chalabi to set up the Iraqi International Law Group, which was called a ‘marketing partnership for Iraq’s reconstruction.’ What it really was, was a war profiteering agency that would rake in billions of dollars on the backs of oppressed and psychologically devastated Iraqis. The companies brought in for this war profiteering were almost exclusively Zionist. 55 Israeli companies are now working in the ruins of Iraq, under assumed names (10), including Perini, the company of Zionist Senator Diane Feinstein’s husband, Richard Blum, which has received over half a billion dollars in reconstruction contracts (11). Since the invasion, the Zionist entity has exported $300 million of goods annually to Iraq.

It has profited from artifacts stolen from Iraq’s soil, like ancient Talmudic manuscripts extracted by the US army’s elite ‘MET Alpha’ unit in May of 2003. Dual citizens of Israel from Kurdistan, working with Mossad, are also engaged in hostile takeovers of the tombs of sacred men regarded as Prophets in the Abrahamic faiths, claiming these are ‘Jewish’ properties to be overseen by the Israeli Minister of Tourism, although every Prophet mentioned is fully accepted by Iraq’s Muslims, and Muslims worldwide. The tombs of the Prophets Jonah in Mosul, Daniel in Kirkuk, Ezekiel in Babel Province near the city of Najaf, and Ezra in Misan Province near Basra belong to Iraq (12). Any statement declaring that these sites belong to Israel is simply more Zionist madness.

Other profiteers included war criminal Dick Cheney’s company Halliburton and its subsidiary KBR, which had made billions in building US military bases worldwide, and former CIA agent Erik Prince’s Blackwater, now known as XE, whose homicidal campaigns of trigger happy paramilitary activity have left thousands of Iraqis dead, including the infamous massacre in Nisoor Square. It is estimated that over 100,000 military contractors on the Zionist US government’s payroll are still operating in occupied Iraq, many of them from XE, and 7,000 more have just been sent in after the withdrawal of several brigades of US military men.

Mossad Agents Everywhere

The Secretary General of Hezbollah, his eminence, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, made an extremely important point that must be taken into account, during his historic speech for Al Quds Day this year, “If the level of the Israeli spying activities in Lebanon is so high, what can we say about the Israeli espionage in Iraq, amid an American occupation? All of us know that having a strong and unified Iraq is a red line for Israel. That’s why Israel believes it should work day and night to promote conflicts among Iraqis (13).” Mossad has been caught by local Iraqi police interrogating and torturing civilians detained in secret prisons (14).

A retired Israel intelligence offier, Shmoel Avivi has been the primary weapons dealer for ‘terrorist groups’ in Iraq since 2005 (15). More than 530 Iraqi scientists have been slaughtered by Mossad hit squads since 2003, and many of their family members have gone missing (16). As of November 2009, 950 Israeli agents were stationed in Kirkuk and are rumored to have a bomb-making facility there. Just like the parasitic Israeli drones & balloons that have been flying in Lebanese airspace since Hezbollah thoroughly embarrassed the Zionist entity in 2006, several Israel Aerospace Industries reconnaissance drones have been sighted in Iraq since 2007. The killing of an Israeli soldier during a US onslaught against Fallujah that claimed hundreds of innocent lives in 2004, exposed a Zionist network of over 1,000 operatives scattered across neighboring villages (17).

False flags have become the signature of Mossad involvement in a crime; assistance comes from their allies in CIA or MI5. The case of the two British soldiers dressed up as members of Al-Mahdi Army planting car bombs in the fall of 2005 serves as the most prominent illustration (18). No Iraqi Resistance organization, Sunni or Shia, Muslim or Christian has ever claimed responsibility for any of the truck bombings, ‘suicide bombings,’ or IEDs that have been a part of life in Iraq since the occupation began. The reason why they have never claimed responsibility, is because they aren’t the ones responsible. No suspect has ever been caught in any truck or car bombing.

No body for any suicide bomber has ever been uncovered or identified. The IEDs have been portrayed in the Zionist media as homemade explosive devices used by ‘desperate insurgents.’ A closer look at the capabilities of the IED cuts through this monumental and condescending lie; the devices are anything but innovative. These devices are designed. The explosions produced by these devices are powerful enough to flip over a 70 ton tank. Several of the IED models are equipped with depleted uranium projectiles to pierce the toughest military-grade armor (19).

The explosions that murdered 125 innocents at the Imam Ali Mosque on August 29, 2003, the series of bombings that murdered 178 people and injured 500 more on March 2, 2004 for Ashoura, and the two truck bombs that murdered 152 innocents and critically injured 347 more in Tal Afar on March 27th 2007 are menacingly revealing examples that military grade explosives were used due to depleted uranium-tipped shells being found at the scenes of the massacres (20). T

he only place where such sophisticated weaponry is produced, is the Zionist entity’s laboratories. The IEDs are manufactured by Rafael Advance Defense Systems, the chief weapons developer for IOF. The triggers for the IEDs are manufactured by Zionist company Zapata Engineering, which was given a $200 million contract to store US ammunition and destroy ‘enemy’ ammunition in Iraq. Zapata Engineering convoys routinely travel with US army brigades (21). It is quite interesting, that Zapata’s main office in North Carolina, is near the Fort Bragg US army base where Mossad agents trained assassination squads in 2003 (22). All evidence points to the fact that the murderers of Iraq’s people are NOT Iraqis, but efficiently trained, Zionist explosive experts. The Sayyed was right, Israel works hard day and night indeed.

Debunking The Zionist Propaganda

A final point that needs to be addressed before concluding, is the point of the two theories that mislead those seeking the truth about Iraq, deflecting their attention from Israel to groundlessness. The first theory is a relatively old one, the second theory is a relatively new one. The first theory is the timeless “War for Oil” diatribe that was introduced by the same ‘liberal’ Zionist ideologues that backed the US invasion then miraculously turned against their initial decision. The US already dominated the oil industry. Its excellent relations due to its imposing military presence in a plethora of oil rich nations including Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, the UAE, Bahrain, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia are evidence of this; and this isn’t counting its own profitable oil and natural reserves on its stolen and occupied Native American land, its bases in East Asia, and its bases in several oil-rich nations on the annihilated continent of Africa.

The last thing the US needed was Iraq’s oil. Also, US oil corporations were able, willing, and ready to deal with Saddam Hussein because they feared losing out to Russian, Asian and European competition once Iraq no longer accepted dollars for oil, only Euros. They had already been in deep economic engagement with oil administrators in Iraq, despite sanctions, embargoes, and congressional & presidential disapproval. War and genocide would severely damage their business relationship with Saddam, and it did once the occupation began, hence why gas prices in the US spiked throughout Bush’s reprehensible presidency.

One detail that is never mentioned by the erroneous “War for Oil” crowd for obvious tribal reasons, is that if there indeed was a war for oil, it was a war for oil to send to the Zionist entity. In 1927, the sanguinary British Empire, acting at the behest of Lord Rothschild and his immensely powerful banking clan, built a pipeline from Kirkuk to Haifa to accommodate the energy needs of Zionist Jews illegally migrating into Palestine. After more than two decades of regional conflict, especially unified uprisings in Iraq against the oppressive UK-installed monarchy, the pipeline was severely damaged and it eventually decayed, although the transit route remained. O

nce the bloodthirsty US military was firm in Iraq’s ground, Zionist Bush reopened the idea of renovating the pipeline much to the delight of his Zionist controllers (23); mass murderer Netanyahu commented “Soon you will see Iraqi oil flowing to Haifa. It is just a matter of time until the pipeline is reconstituted, and Iraqi oil will flow to the Mediterranean. It’s not a pipe dream; (24)” and in April of 2008, Haaretz reported the plan to transport Kirkuk’s oil to Haifa via Jordan, the usurping entity’s monarchical ally, for a lucrative transfer fee (25).

The second of the theories, and the more absurd of the two, is that Iran is behind much of the chaos in Iraq, using death squads to breed ethno-religious conflict and instability. It is sickening that there are actually commentators and journalists who believe this idiocy, and it makes one wonder if they are simply Zionist-trained propagandists used to infiltrate the Resistance movement. The only death squads in Iraq are the Special Forces admittedly trained by the CIA, the Pentagon, and the Zionist entity to conduct assassination, kidnaping, torture and rape to intimidate the people into submission (26).

These CIA death squads are behind the near extermination of Iraq’s ancient Christian population, who were instrumental in the accomplishment of the July 14th Revolution that removed the British monarchy in Iraq, whose scientists helped make Iraq a center of academia in the Middle East, and whose benevolent leaders always had solidarity with Iraq’s predominantly Muslim population (27). It was the occupying entities of America and Israel that murdered Iraq’s Christians, NOT Iraqis. These foolish anti-Shia, anti-Persian bigots can’t show us a drop of depleted uranium from Iran, an Iranian military base, an Iranian tank, Iranian white phosphorus, Iranian mark-77, Iranian cluster bombs, an Iranian lobby instigating the violation of Iraq’s sovereignty and people, or an Iranian media brainwashing the global masses to support the genocide in Iraq because they don’t exist. Spreading disunity and hatred benefits nobody but the Zionist occupiers.

Conclusion

The occupation of Iraq is nowhere near over despite the Zionist-birthed, Zionist-funded, Zionist-supported stooge and liar Barack Obama’s proclamations with cover from the Zionist media. 94 military bases still remain. 40 military camps still remain. 50,000 troops and 100,000 contractors still remain. The largest US embassy in the world is an everyday reminder for the Iraqis of the repugnance, revulsion, and dehumanization they have faced for the past 7 years. The large majority of Iraqi children suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (28); the mental scars inflicted by the occupation may never heal. Depleted uranium has a half-life of 4.5 billion years; thousands of tons of this destructive substance have been spilled in Iraq since 1990 and the damage caused is irreversible. The tactics used by the occupation forces were designed and implemented to break the people. Iraq remembers Mahmudiyah, Haditha, Karbala, Najaf, Diyala, Anbar, Mukaradeeb, Mosul, Khanaqin, and Baghdad, Basra and Fallujah over and over again. Iraq remembers and it will never forget.

Iraq is the cradle of civilization. It is the sacred land where Prophets walked. Similar to occupied Palestine, it is holy to Muslims, Christians, and Jews who lived together harmoniously before the Zionist entity was created. Iraq is the land of knowledge, where its contributions to mathematics, science, poetry, language, art and culture were known and cherished worldwide. This rich history is no longer at the forefront though when one thinks of Iraq.

Now Iraq is the land of the butchered and the deformed. The land of the infected and the cancerous. The land of shattered dreams and disintegrated lives. The land of the depraved and the degraded. The land of the raped and the insulted. The land of widows. The land of orphans. The land of sorrow. The land of despair. The land of the broken. But… Iraqis are still here. Iraqis are still here, and still fighting.

The murder of Iraq was designed and executed by the agents of international Zionism, the leaders of which reside in Israel, America, and Britain. Those who subscribe to another theory are dead wrong, and the facts confirm it. Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said that a strong, unified Iraq was a ‘red line’ for Israel, and he couldn’t be more correct. Like in the days of revolutionary leader Abdul Karim Qasim, who overthrew the British-installed dynasty, Iraq will be strong and unified again. Iraq will mend the pieces of its broken land. It will heal the wounded, and celebrate the lives of its martyrs. Iraq will rise again. And when it does, it will once again strike fear in the hearts of its Zionist enemies.

~ The End ~  

Sources:

(1) Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America by Robert Friedman (rip); Prostitutes conquer Kirkuk; report written with blood by Soran Mama Hama (rip)

(2) Iraq is America’s Gaza by Allen L. Roland

(3) Post-invasion Iraq – the facts by Hadani Ditmars

(4) Ghettoizing Baghdad by Felicity Arbuthnot

(5) Iraq was invaded to protect Israel – US official by Emad Mekay

(6) Ex-Mideast Envoy Zinni Charges Neocons Pushed Iraq War To Benefit Israel by Ori Nir and Ami Eden

(7) ‘Iraq Was Invaded to Secure Israel,’ says Senator Hollings by Mark Weber

(8) Wolfowitz’s Real Crimes by Abu Spinoza

(9) Doug Feith: “I Was a Major Player” In Bush’s Torture Policy by Jason Leopold

(10) 55 Zionist Companies Working In Iraq Under Assumed Names by Yaqen News Agency, translated by Muhammad Abu Nasr

(11) Senator Feinstein’s War Profiteering by Joshua Frank

(12) Israel Hopes To Colonize Parts of Iraq as ‘Greater Israel’ by Wayne Madsen

(13) Sayyed Nasrallah: Mideast Peace Talks Are “Born Dead” by Hussein Assi, Al Manar

(14) Mossad Does Interrogations in Iraqi Jails: Human Rights Group by China Radio International English

(15) Israeli Officer Sells Weapons To Terrorists In Iraq by PressTV

(16) Mossad Murdered 530 Iraqi Scientists. Plight of Iraqi Academics by Special Report, Al Jazeera and Dr. Ismail Jalili

(17) Israel’s Battle In Fallujah by Rashid Khashana, Al Hayat

(18) British “Undercover Soldiers” Caught Driving Booby Trapped Car by Michel Chossudovsky

(19) Israeli made IEDs and US Zapata Engineering made IED triggers are killing US, Canadian and NATO soldiers by NB Gazette

(20) Iraq IEDs: Mossad/Zapata Engineering Conspiracy? By Cloak and Dagger

(21) Marines Jail Contractors in Iraq by David Phinney

(22) Israel Trains US Assassination Squads In Iraq by Julian Borger

(23) Israel seeks pipeline for Iraqi oil by Ed Vuillamy

(24) Netanyahu Says Iraq-Israel Oil Line No Pipe-Dream by Steven Scheer

(25) U.S. checking possibility of pumping oil from northern Iraq to Haifa, via Jordan by Amiram Cohen

(26) CIA death squads operating in Iraq by Henry Michaels

(27) US War Against Iraq: Destruction Of A Civilization by James Petras

(28) Iraqi Children: Bearing the Scars of War by Cesar Chelala

Posted in WorldComments Off on THE ZIONIST MURDERERS OF IRAQ

PARK51: A ZIONIST PSYOP

NOVANEWS

December 31, 2010

by Jonathan Azaziah

by Jonathan Azaziah

www.maskofzion.com

New York (City) is a place that is heavily influenced, and in the majority of instances, utterly controlled by the obscenely wealthy Zionist elite.

The governorship is currently occupied by David Paterson, who replaced the disgraced Zionist Eliot Spitzer. Just two days after Spitzer stepped down, New York’s Zionist leaders fully endorsed Paterson, who had been well known for his charity activities in the Zionist community even prior to becoming governor (1). His lieutenant governor, who controls the state senate, is Richard Ravitch. Though his ascension to the position was ruled unlawful (2), he remains in power. Ravitch is a powerful Zionist whose construction company built Manhattan Plaza and Waterside Plaza and who has been involved in Zionist fund-raising for half of a century (3). The speaker of New York’s State Assembly is Zionist Sheldon Silver, and earlier this year, he made a request that Ravitch, and not Paterson, should take control of New York’s budget crisis (4).

New York’s US Senate members include the junior official, Kirsten Gillibrand, who stated that she will be an ‘unwavering supporter’ of the Zionist entity and ‘continue to assure Israel’s strategic military advantage in the region (5),’ and the senior official, long-familiar Zionist politician Chuck Schumer, who made it known that he thinks it makes sense to strangle Gaza economically (6). New York City’s representatives in the US House are entirely Zionist. Anthony Weiner, Jerrold Nadler, Nita Lowey, Steven Israel, Eliot Engel, and Gary Ackerman all support Israel unabashedly.

New York City’s mayor is 9/11 criminal, the Zionist billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who regularly donates to pro-Israel charities (7). New York’s Department of Education is headed by Zionist Joel Klein, selected to serve by Bloomberg. Klein and Bloomberg finalized an agreement with the United Federation of Teachers’ President, Zionist Randi Weingarten, to have total dominion over New York’s school system (8).

The diamond industry in New York has always been a ‘Jewish’ establishment since the city’s inception (9), and once the plot to create Israel was hatched, the diamond district began funneling dollars to the Zionist power brokers. The Diamonds Dealers Club (DDC), the elite ‘club’ within the diamond district that makes all of the important decisions, has a board of directors and an arbitrators’ committee comprised of several Israeli-born Zionists, and is owned and operated by Zionists Moshe Mosbacher, who serves as President, and Martin Hochbaum, who serves as Managing Director (10).

The former president of DDC, Jacob Banda, who recently died, was a staunch Zionist who contributed substantial amounts to Hatzalah, a Jews-only ambulance service that is prominent in Israel (11). New York’s diamond district is going through a renovation process that will model it after Israel’s Diamond Exchange (12). All of Israel’s top diamond exporters have offices within the New York diamond district. The transactions being processed represent billions of dollars for the Zionist entity (13).

The most famous, and most influential New York city paper is the New York Times, owned by the Ochs-Sulzberger family, a wealthy Zionist creed that has donated to pro-Israel causes for more than 100 years despite outwardly opposing the usurping entity at times so the family appears ‘non-Zionist’ (14). To this very day, it operates with a strong bias for the Zionist state and reinforces the negative portrayal of Arabs and Muslims in accordance with the other mainstream media outlets (15).

The NASDAQ is controlled by Zionist Robert Greifeld, who signed an agreement with Ester Levanon, the CEO of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange to formalize a ‘closer relationship’ between the two markets (16). The Dow Jones is controlled by the CME Group, owned by Christian Zionists Terrence Duffy and Craig Donohue. Duffy and Donohue purchased the stock exchange from News Corp, owned by infamous Zionist Rupert Murdoch. Duffy and Donohue were honored by Hebrew University earlier this year for their ‘strong support of the state of Israel,’ with Duffy receiving the Zionist school’s National Scopus Award (17).

Hebrew University is built on illegally occupied land in Jerusalem. Wall Street is crawling with Zionists, and every company involved in the recent criminal bailout of the banking industry had deep loyalties to the illegitimate terror state. Several of the financial giants were also connected to the 9/11 false flag attack (18).

It is perfectly reasonable to hypothesize, considering how much financial clout and political power the Zionists possess, that any project, structure, or event going against their interest in New York wouldn’t be able to come to fruition. The Park51 ‘community center’ is within this realm of discussion, and the hypothesis is in fact, a reality. It was approved by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission to move forward (19).

Every official on the board is selected by the New York City mayor (in this case, Zionist Michael Bloomberg). Another official selected by Bloomberg, the New York City comptroller, John Liu, has recently suggested that Park51 should be granted public funding (20). As the evidence that will be uniformly laid out in this article will prove, Park51 is nothing but a Zionist PSYOP designed to mislead and galvanize the masses around a complete non-issue, especially the Muslim masses, and divert their attention from what actually matters: 9/11 truth, worldwide US-Zionist aggression, and the worsening illegal occupations of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Palestine.

Visionary or Stooge?

Feisal Abdul Rauf has been hailed by his supporters as a man who has taken on the complexities of Western-Muslim relations and triumphed by bridging the gap with his scholarly books and numerous lectures which he has delivered around the world. This is a fairy tale. Nothing could be further from the truth. He is a staunch capitalist with numerous connections to the US elite, US intelligence, the Zionist Power Configuration and whose primary concern is making a dollar; not the welfare of his ‘fellow’ Muslims.

The criminal use of usury in the United States, coupled with the use of fiat money, is the sole reason for the ever-growing national debt, and the increasing deterioration of the US economy. The tax dollars collected by the intimidation organization known as the IRS pay the interest on the US debt to the privately-owned, Zionist-infested Federal Reserve Bank, not social programs for the poor, health care for the elderly, superb education for future generations, or research and development into bettering society as a whole (21). Due to the criminality associated with usury throughout history, as well as the erosion of spiritual and moral principles that accompanies it, Islam strictly forbids the charging of interest (22).

Feisal Abdul Rauf however, doesn’t concur. He has suggested that the lack of engaging in usury has ‘held the Muslim world back,’ as well as the reason that the Muslim world is ‘lagging behind (23).’ This is an insulting and ludicrous position. Setting morality and honor aside, Islamic banking has proved to be exceedingly profitable and beneficial to the public living under such a financial system, especially in the Islamic Republic of Iran (24). The force that has ‘held the Muslim world back,’ as Rauf so disrespectfully and egregiously expressed, is the United States’ and Zionist entity’s unrelenting aggression that has facilitated countless genocides, occupations, and desecrations of land, as well as subsidizations of brutal, suppressive dictatorial regimes that have developed an uncanny ability to violate human rights.

Feisal Abdul Rauf has taken great pride in his physics degree from Columbia University, his New York Giants fandom, and his niece’s US Army service in occupied Iraq (25). Columbia University is an infamously Zionist institution that has a partnership with the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, a school built on stolen land in occupied Palestine and a key asset to Israel’s nuclear program (26).

The New York Giants are co-owned by the powerful Tisch family, which have been active in Zionist causes for as long as the usurping Israeli entity has existed, with the patriarch of the family, Preston Robert Tisch, being honored by the United Jewish Appeal with the George Young Award (27). The US army has heavily contributed to the murder of 1.5 million civilians in occupied Iraq, committing unfathomably gruesome crimes that have terrorized men, women, and children for seven years. Serving in the army isn’t something to be proud of; it is something that should secure life imprisonment for mass murder and crimes against humanity. In his attempts to convince the American public that he is just as ‘American’ as them, he has enforced some of the many things that are wrong with US society: consumerism, support of illegal wars, attending universities contributing to Zionism, and the pointless obsession with entertainment and games that distract the masses from their government’s plethora of evils.

Rauf has attempted to portray himself as someone who stands against injustice, but this too is a carefully orchestrated public relations campaign, catered to Muslims and the anti-war movement to garner support for the Park51 project. If he was in fact a person that believed in the triumph of the just over the unjust, Rauf wouldn’t have assisted the FBI in its ‘counterterrorism’ efforts after the 9/11 false flag attack (28). The FBI has functioned as a terror organization from its inception. Whether it was being involved in the assassination of legendary revolutionary Malcolm X (29), its COINTELPRO program that helped destroy the Black Panther Party (30), its involvement with the 1993 false flag attack on the World Trade Center (31), or its recent raids on anti-war and pro-Palestine solidarity activists (32), FBI policy has never been about ‘countering’ terrorism; it has been about perpetrating it. The US State Department also has a long-standing relationship with Rauf. War criminal George Bush’s administration sent Rauf on speaking tours across the Middle East in 2006 and 2007 (33), including a conference in the US client state of Qatar, which houses the largest wing of the US Airforce on Al-Udeid Air Base, a strategic location vital to US-Zionist occupation operations across the Middle East (34).

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is a powerful New York-based foreign policy think tank that has had an incestuous relationship with the United States government since its creation nearly 90 years ago, with every administration being overrun with CFR members (35), including the administration of Zionist war criminal Barack Obama (36). The CFR was founded as a part of notorious colonialist Cecil Rhodes’ ‘Round Table’ plan, which was designed to spread the principles of globalization throughout the upper echelons of finance and politics using the influence of think tanks (37).

Rhodes was heavily financed by Lord Nathan Rothschild, of the vastly powerful Rothschild banking dynasty, the godfathers of Israel (38). It was Lord Nathan Rothschild’s son, Lionel Walter Rothschild, that formulated what is now known as the ‘Balfour Delcaration,’ the infamous document that paved the way for Britain’s criminal partition of Palestinian land and the illegal creation of the Zionist entity.

Feisal Abdul Rauf is a member of this treacherous organization (39); he sits on its Religious Advisory Committee with several influential Zionists including Madeleine Albright, the former Secretary of State who thinks the genocidal sanctions imposed against Iraq, which annihilated 1.5 million people including more than half a million children, were ‘worth it (40);’ Ruth Messinger, the CEO of American Jewish World Service, who blogs for the Maryland chapter of Hillel, the loathsome Zionist student organization whose motto is ‘Wherever we stand, we stand with Israel (41);’ David Saperstein, the director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, an organization that has an international affairs budget that provides ‘assistance’ to Israel, and which believes ‘robust’ foreign assistance is key to achieving ‘peace (42)’ and openly advertises AIPAC on its website; and Rabbi Arthur Schenier, the honorary president of Religious Zionists of America, the honorary chairman of the American section of the World Jewish Congress, a member of the Executive Committee of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, and a close associate of the illegitimate regime in Tel Aviv that has helped spread the Zionist entity’s propaganda throughout the world (43).

Another member of the CFR Religious Advisory Committee is Jim Wallis, the founder of Sojourners Magazine. Rauf has an extensive working relationship with Wallis, and they’ve participated in many lectures and conferences together including several for Sojourners itself (44). Though Wallis initially denied any connection, he finally admitted that his magazine receives funding from George Soros (45), the corrosive Zionist billionaire who bankrolls J Street (46), a Zionist organization that portrays itself as peaceful when it supports the illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, the apartheid two-state solution and the continued illegal occupation of Jerusalem. Soros is an internationally known financial criminal who was convicted of insider trading in France, who bankrupted the Bank of England (47), and who assaulted Malaysia’s currency to undermine the vehemently anti-Zionist Malaysian Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad (48).

Another organization that Rauf is connected to is the Aspen Institute, a Zionist think tank advertised by the hawkish Zionist organization, the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs under its ‘useful links’ section, and which recently hosted the Zionist entity’s ambassador to America, dual-citizen Michael Oren (49). Rauf has taken part in many ‘working groups’ at the Aspen Institute to promote religious tolerance (50). This is unadulterated hypocrisy. Zionism is the most intolerant ideology on earth; it is against the human rights of Muslims, Christians, Jews, Arabs, Asians, Latinos, Blacks, Caucasians and anyone else who opposes it.

The Aspen Institute is a purveyor of Zionism, as indicated by its Board of Overseers which is comprised of several authoritative Zionists including CEO Walter Isaacson, the chairman of the US-Palestinian Partnership, a Zionist front that lobbies for the apartheid two-state solution and more tourism in Israel (51), and a strong supporter of collaborationist puppet Salam Fayyad (52); Lester Crown, of the massively wealthy Crown family, a high-ranking political consultant on Israeli affairs in the Zionist lobby, a huge financial supporter of Zionist war criminal Obama, and gargantuan contributor to pro-Israel causes (53); Margot Priztker, a staunch supporter of the apartheid wall (54), and whose elite family has donated generously to many Zionist causes, including the Jewish Community Relations Council, a pro-Israel group which advocates the purchase of Zionist products and engages in political sabotage when Israel is condemned (55); and Ranji Nagaswami, who also sits on the Board of Trustees at the New York City Employees’ Retirement System, an organization that routinely purchases bonds from the illegitimate state of Israel (56), and is a former chief investment officer of Alliance Bernstein, a global investment management firm, whose executives have been honored by the aforementioned Hebrew University, built on occupied land in Palestine (57).

If Rauf’s numerous connections to the murderous Bush administration and the elite Zionists in the highest peaks of politics and finance aren’t disturbing enough, then his self-proclaimed support of the terrorist state of Israel should put the proverbial nail in the coffin for anyone who still supports him (58). Rauf isn’t a shimmering visionary who has dedicated his life to the pursuit of peace, justice, religious unity and tolerance; he is a capitalist slumlord (59) that was tapped by the elite power brokers in America to be a stooge in their latest media fiasco to direct the public’s attention elsewhere, while they continue their raping, pillaging and plundering of ancestral Arab and Muslim lands.

The Usual Suspects

Follow the money. This is the rule of thumb when discussing any major geopolitical occurrence as well as the illusion of a major geopolitical occurrence. Park51 would most certainly fall under the latter category. The money trail leading to the ‘Islamic’ Center, as well as its board of directors are connected to the same sources behind any shake-up that occurs globally. It is the same bloody, corrupt, elitist, Zionist money.

The site where Park51 is supposed to be built was sold to Soho Properties, where Rauf is an investor (60), by the Pomerantz family, a powerful real-estate dynasty in New York connected to the equally powerful Milstein family via their former ownership of a Burlington Coat Factory near Ground Zero (61). The Pomerantz and Milstein families are active in Zionist causes, and the patriarch of the latter, Monroe Milstein, donated a $125,000 ambulance to the Zionist entity last year (62).

The Cordoba Initiative, Rauf’s official sponsor of the Park51 project is overseen by a Board of Advisors. The board includes R. Leslie Deak, a former CIA official, private security contractor and heir to a drug money laundering dynasty (63), Rabbi Joy Levitt, a supporter of the Zionist regime’s apartheid wall and a harsh critic of anti-Zionism, which she equates to anti-Semitism (64), Rabbi Brad Hirschfield, an absurd Zionist apologist who recently blogged about the illegitimate usurping entity building human dignity and securing human rights, along with the typical pro-Israel idiocy regarding it being the only free and democratic ‘country’ in the Middle East (65), and a member of the aforementioned Rothschild-founded CFR, noted globalist, John Edwin Mroz, who also sits on the board with Rauf at the One Voice Movement, a Zionist organization pushing for an apartheid two-state solution with an Honorary Board of Advisors consisting of Mossad officials, Zionist bankers, racist Israeli Knesset members, Fatah collaborationists and agents of the monstrous Rothschild and Bronfman dynasties (66).

The other organization that Rauf is using to promote the Park51 project is the America Society for Muslim Advancement (ASMA). ASMA is being funded by a ‘who’s who’ of global elitist ‘charity’ organizations, each one loaded with intelligence officers, CFR members, bankers and Zionist policy makers. The moneymen include the Carnegie Corporation of New York, Rockefeller Brothers, Rockefeller Philanthropy, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Global Fund For Women, William and Mary Greve Foundation, The Sister Fund, The Russell Family Foundation, Danny Kaye and Sylvia Fine Foundation, Graham Charitable Foundation, Deak Family Foundation, Henry Luce Foundation, The Elizabeth Foundation, The Ms. Foundation and Hunt Alternatives (67). These are not charitable foundations; these are image-cleaners for the Zionist warmongers and corporate thieves who run them, covering up their genocidal crimes throughout the globe with a pinch of forced ‘good will’ here, and another pinch there. It’s abominable.

If Park51 was anything other than a US-Zionist propaganda operation, why are such revolting organizations habitually funding it? Why did a known Zionist family, who contributes to the destruction of Arab and Muslim lands via their donations to the terrorist state of Israel, sell Rauf and his constituents the property to build Park51 to begin with? And why, if Rauf’s intentions were to build understanding between Islam and the West, as well as to secure the betterment of his fellow Muslims, are there Zionist hatemongers sitting on the boards of his organizations? The answer to all of these questions is a relatively simple one: Rauf is a stooge, and Park51 is exactly what it appears to be, a Zionist PSYOP.

Zionist Control Over Both Sides of the Argument

The Hegelian Dialectic is defined as ‘thesis, antithesis, and synthesis used as analytic tool in order to approach a higher unity or a new thesis.’ In other words: Problem, Reaction, Solution. The Hegelian Dialectic is a common tactic used all over the world by the Zionist criminal network. Create the enemy, fund the opposition to the enemy, then broker a deal between the two factions to appear heroic, democratic, peaceful, etc. The Hegelian Dialectic was used prominently in the Park51 ‘controversy,’ as the Zionist criminal network inserted its agents on both sides of the ‘raging debate,’ with those against the project represented in the media as anti-Islamists and those for the project as ‘Jewish’ voices for religious unity and tolerance. The latter is a fallacy. There was no ‘Jewish’ support; only Zionist control.

Opposition to the community center included influential neo-conservative journalist Stephen Schwartz (68), a hawkish Zionist posing as a Sufi who has defended the genocide in Iraq by the US-Israeli alliance and has accused those seeking 9/11 truth as ‘Jew-haters (69);’ Zionist war criminal Joe Lieberman and his Zionist constituent in the US Congress Peter King (70); Long-time New York politics stalwart Richard Brodsky (71), an active member of the Zionist fund-raising community (72); Defender of the Freedom Flotilla massacre Congressman Steve Israel (73); the criminal ADL (74), the despicable Zionist Organization of America (75), and the ageless, propaganda-spreading Simon Wiesenthal Center (76) which abhorrently concocted a project to build a Zionist museum on a Palestinian cemetery (77); the right-wing extremist Tea Party (78), bankrolled by Zionist billionaires David Koch, Charles Koch and infamous ultra-Zionist Rupert Murdoch (79); and of course, the notoriously vile Islamophobes Pamela Geller (80) and Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch (81), both of whom are heavily funded by the Zionist power couple of Aubrey and Joyce Chernick, who have donated to the aforementioned ADL and Zionist Organization of America for decades (82).

Supporters of the community center included 9/11 criminal Mayor Bloomberg himself (83); the American Jewish Committee (84), one of the oldest Zionist organizations in America; the Zionist New York Times, which presented several articles depicting Rauf’s globalist project in a positive light (85); the Zionist New York Representative Jerrold Nadler (86), another defender of the Freedom Flotilla massacre (87); Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer (88), who marched in the ‘Salute to Israel’ festival, a parade honoring the murderous Zionist entity, earlier this summer (89); former Bush speech writer Michael Gerson (90), a sickening defender of the Zionist genocide of Gaza in 2008-09 (91); the aforesaid Soros-funded Zionist lobby organization J Steet (92); Mormon Zionist Utah Senator Orin Hatch (93), who enjoys singing songs for the brutal occupier of Palestine (94); and even the Zionist entity’s mouthpiece Haaretz, which has published a handful of articles supporting Rauf and his project (95).

In addition, every Western television station, exclusively owned by the Zionist criminal network, broadcasted nonstop coverage of the ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ controversy, making it the must-see news story every single day for months on end, raking in billions of dollars in the process while simultaneously depriving the public of any real news, as always. Indeed, the only beneficiaries of this project have been Israel, its supporters and its collaborators in spreading worldwide hatred of Islam and covering up its slew of international crimes.

A Note Regarding The Qur’an Burning

Amidst the height of the Park51 controversy, another level of the PSYOP was brought into play: Burning the Holy Qur’an on the ninth anniversary of 9/11. This detestable act was to be carried out by Pastor Terry Jones of the tiny Dove World Outreach Center in Gainesville, Florida.

While the plot was internationally condemned by Muslims and non-Muslims alike from Egypt to occupied Kashmir, occupied Afghanistan to occupied Iraq, Europe to America, the voices speaking up regarding who was behind such a repulsive act were non-existent other than those coming from the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad slammed Jones’ plan as a ‘Zionist plot, and against the teachings of all divine prophets (96).’ Leader of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khameini, called the Qur’an burning a ‘stage in the extending trend of anti-Islamism led by Zionism and the American regime (97).’ Several bloggers and activists chastised the Iranian leaders and insulted them, remarking that ‘not everything is a Zionist plot,’ and even going as far as calling the Resistance leaders ‘idiots.’ However, upon further scrutiny of the evidence, it is clear that the Ayatollah and the Iranian President are correct in their accusations and observations.

Terry Jones is in fact, a self-admitted Zionist who thinks Islam is cursed because Islam cursed Israel (98). It should go without saying, that Islam never cursed Israel; Israel cursed Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Arabs, Hebrews and all of humanity with its very existence. The illegitimate terror state has desecrated holy sites, holy relics, holy books, holy prophets and the righteous people of dignity and faith from occupied Palestine, Lebanon, occupied Kashmir, Syria, Jordan, Pakistan and occupied Iraq since its bastardized creation 62 years ago.

The ‘icing on the cake’ regarding the issue of Terry Jones’ Qur’an burning being a Zionist plot is revealed in the publisher of his ‘book.’ Jones threw together a pack of filthy lies, racism, ignorance and xenophobia, bound them together and called it a book, entitled ‘Islam Is Of The Devil.’ The publisher of this vicious drivel is a company called Creation House; Creation House is a subsidiary of Strang Communications, owned by none other than evangelical fanatic, Stephen Strang (99). Stephen Strang is the director of operations in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina for Christians United for Israel (100), the parasitic Zionist organization which has donated millions upon millions of dollars to the usurping regime.

It would now appear that the idiots are not President Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Khameini, but those who closed their minds and eyes to the fact that everything pertaining to Islamophobia and divisions amongst indigenous peoples is connected to the Zionist regime. These persons tend to forget that the entire Western media is owned by Zionists; this in and of itself is evidence that the Qur’an burning was a Zionist plot, excluding the undeniable evidence presented above; it is illogical to believe that a bantam church with a congregation of 50 people could make national headlines without the Zionist media networks making sure it did so.

It was broadcasted to achieve a certain purpose; that purpose was to place a schism between Muslims and Christians and drive another dagger into the heart of Islam. This plot though, like so many other plots against Islam, didn’t go according to Zionist plans. Just in Washington D.C. alone, 180 men and women reverted to Islam after seeing its beauty attacked via the depravity of Terry Jones (101).

Conclusion: The Real Issues

Though Rauf and his Park51 project have not been extensively featured in the Zionist-owned media in the past month, its existence will always serve as a weapon for the propagandists to use when a distraction is needed during moments of crisis that have massive geopolitical repercussions. Hate-monger Bill O’Reilly of Zionist Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News, ranted on The View, of ABC, owned by Zionist Robert Iger, about the Ground Zero Mosque while spewing 9/11 falsehoods on October 16th (102), and the Sulzberger-owned New York Times just featured a piece on Rauf’s wife, Daisy Khan, and the Park51 project on November 14th (103).

This ridiculousness isn’t going away; unless Muslims and non-Muslims reject it as the fraud, the sham, the joke and the disgrace that it is. The religious scholars of al-Azhar University in Egypt slammed the Park51 project as a ‘Zionist conspiracy,’ further saying that the community center represents the ‘devious mentality of connecting 9/11 with Islam though Islam is innocent (104).’ The righteous scholars of al-Azhar couldn’t be more correct. The Park51 community center will feature a memorial for the victims murdered in the 9/11 attacks which Park51 attributes to ‘extremism and radicalism (105).’

The issues at hand are not religious freedom and understanding between the Muslims and the West. And even if they were, Park51 does not represent these issues; Park51 represents the Zionist desecration of these issues and the cover-up of Western crimes against Muslims. Park51 represents the mask being placed on the war against Islam and other Godwary persons of the Jewish and Christian faiths living in Arab and Muslim lands under Zionist occupation and oppression.

Park51 represents the disgusting idea that the only way Muslims can be ‘American’ is if they assimilate into the American culture of materialism, war, depravity, entertainment, corrupt politics and half-hearted religiousness.

The real issues at hand are the Zionist-designed American and British genocidal occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, the Zionist occupation of Palestine, the Zionist-assisted Indian occupation of Kashmir, the Tel Aviv occupation of Syria’s Golan Heights, the Israeli occupation of Lebanon’s Ghajar, Kfar Shouba Hills and Shebaa Farms, murderous drone strikes in Pakistan, the US-backed AU-UN occupation of Somalia, the incoming Zionist-requested occupation of Yemen (106), the Zionist-designed ‘war on terror’ which has ruined thousands of Muslim lives across the globe, most notably Omar Khadr and Dr. Aafia Siddiqui, and 9/11 truth, which is supported by overwhelming evidence that shows the attacks were an intricate Mossad false flag attack to justify the aforementioned crimes (107).

As if the concept itself wasn’t deplorable, the Park51 project is going to cost somewhere in the range of $150 million (108). The supporters of Park51, and the Muslim supporters in particular need to ask themselves two simple questions: Was Islamophobia started by everyday Westerners, or is it the product of a Zionist-propaganda campaign that began after the Zionist criminal network attacked the World Trader Center? And is a $150 million ‘Islamic’ community center the most practical remedy for the plight that Muslims are experiencing all over the world? The answer to the former is obviously the product of a Zionist-propaganda campaign, and the answer to the latter is a resounding ‘NO.’

$150 million could be used to rebuild the lives of the 5 million tormented refugees of occupied Iraq or its 5 million orphans left parentless by the systematic US-Zionist destruction of their nation (109).

$150 million could be given to the suffering people of illegally besieged Gaza, where 80% of the population lives below poverty due to the criminal Zionist blockade (110).

$150 million could be used to build rehabilitation centers for the more than 9,000 women raped by the Indian occupier of Kashmir since 1989 (111).

$150 million could be used to give proper shelter to 3.2 million Afghan refugees who have fled to the Islamic Republics of Iran and Pakistan after their lives were destroyed by US-British occupation forces (112).

$150 million could be used to provide extensive medical care to the Lebanese innocents still feeling the devastation of the Zionist entity’s cluster bombs that ravaged their nation in 2006 (113).

$150 million could sure be used to aid the 21 million displaced Pakistanis forced from their homes by HAARP-induced brutal floods that demolished their country earlier this year (114).

$150 million could be used to rebuild the countless neighborhoods in Somalia utterly destroyed by UN and AU mortar attacks which have slaughtered thousands of civilians already (115).

$150 million could be used for anything but a pointless, arrogant, Zionist-supported community center that has about as much to do with Islam as comatose butcher Ariel Sharon has to do with humanity.

Park51 is the latest Zionist PSYOP in a long line of psychological warfare operations forced upon the public by the pro-Israel media. Park51 shouldn’t be supported; it should be boycotted, along with its Zionist backers. Building a ‘mosque’ near Ground Zero, where nearly 3,000 people were murdered by Mossad and CIA, is not a First Amendment victory for Muslims or a triumph of religious freedom; it is an insult to their faith, their intelligence, their innocence and their dignity.

A triumph of religious freedom for Muslims will be the day the fascist armies of Britain and America are driven out of occupied Iraq, and the mosques of Fallujah, The City of Mosques, are rebuilt so Muslims can worship in peace once more; or the shrines and mosques of the holy cities of Najaf and Karbala are no longer disturbed, damaged and ruined by Israeli IEDs and Mossad car bombs. A triumph of religious freedom for Muslims will be the day they can worship at al-Aqsa in occupied al-Quds without repulsive and racist IOF forces occupying the holy site and harassing them, as well as any other mosque throughout occupied Palestine for that matter.

A triumph of religious freedom for Muslims will be the day that the Indian occupation of Kashmir ends, and the barbaric Indian military curfew is lifted, so Kashmiris can worship at their mosques and shrines freely. A triumph of religious freedom for Muslims, will be the day that the world knows the ugly truth about 9/11, and Muslim women are no longer glared at for wearing their hijab, Muslim men are no longer jeered for keeping a long beard, and Muslim families are no longer attacked when leaving the mosque after Friday prayers because Westerners think of ‘9/11 terrorists’ when they look at a Muslim.

The only time that Muslims should be mentioned in the same breath as 9/11 is when discussing the numerous malevolent crimes committed against them in its name. 9/11 had absolutely nothing to do with Islam and absolutely everything to do with Israel’s Mossad, its sayanim and its allies in the CIA. May the truth behind the atrocious Park51 operation be an eye-opener for all Muslims, as well as all courageous people fighting for justice around the world. And may it prepare them for any other criminal Zionist buffoonery that is sure to be brought forth in the future.

~ The End ~

Sources

(1) Warm Feelings For Spitzer’s Successor by Ben Harris

(2) Richard Ravitch’s Appointment To Lieutenant Governor Ruled Unlawful By Appeals Court by Kenneth Lovett, NY Daily News

(3) The Accidental Lieutenant by David Halbfinger, New York Times

(4) Sheldon Silver Wants Richard Ravitch, Not Gov. Paterson, To Handle Talks On State Budget Crisis by Kenneth Lovett, NY Daily News

(5) Near East Report, November 20, 2006 by AIPAC

(6) Schumer: It Makes Sense To Strangle Gaza by Scott Horton

(7) ‘Giving Pledge’ Could Impact Jewish Philanthropic World by Jacob Berkman, JTA

(8) We Need A Bloomberg by Sever Plocker, Ynet News

(9) Jews And The Diamond Industry by Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

(10) Diamond Industry Appeals To Panama To Promote Trade by National Jeweler Network

(11) Kiryas Joel, NY – Chasidic Diamond Industry, Community Leader Passes Away by Vos Iz Neias

(12) Manhattan’s Diamond District Takes A Shine On Israel by Karin Kloosterman

(13) Leviev Tops List of Israeli Diamond Exporters by National Jeweler Network

(14) A Tragic “Fight in the Family:” The New York Times, Reform Judaism and the Holocaust by Laurel Leff

(15) The Israel Lobby by John Mearshimer and Stephen Walt

(16) NASDAQ And Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Sign MOU by Prime Newswire

(17) Midwest Region Scopus Award Gala Honoring Terrence A. Duffy by American Friends of Hebrew University

(18) The Financial Crisis On Wall Street and The Gang of Zionists Behind 9-11 by Christopher Bollyn

(19) Ground Zero Mosque Plan Moves Forward by Luke Funk

(20) Ground Zero Muslim Center May Get Public Funding by Joan Gralla, Reuters

(21) The Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin

(22) The Holy Qur’an, 2:276-2:280, 3:130, 4:161

(23) What’s Right With Islam: A New Vision For Muslims and The West by Feisal Abdul Rauf

(24) Islamic Banking by Mohamed Ariff, University of Malaysia

(25) The Imam Behind The New York Mosque Enjoys His Megaphone by Dana Milbank, Washington Post; Interview with Feisal Abdul Rauf by Larry King Live

(26) Ben-Gurion University Overview by Office Of Global Programs, Columbia University

(27) Preston Robert Tisch: Biography by The National Jewish Sports Hall of Fame and Museum; Seinfeld, Midler To Headline Jewish Museum Opening by JTA; The Tisch Family by Anna Schneider-Mayerson, The New York Observer

(28) ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ Imam Helped FBI With Counterterrorism Efforts by Sam Stein, Huffington Post

(29) The Undiscovered Malcolm X: Stunning New Info On The Assassination, His Plans To Unite The Civil Rights And Black Nationalist Movements And The 3 ‘Missing’ Chapters From His Autobiography by DemocracyNow!

(30) Art Of The FBI’s COINTELPRO by C. McLaren and Brian Bolning

(31) Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed by Paul DiRienzo, Frank Morales and Chris Flash

(32) Activists Targeted In FBI Raids by Nicole Colson and Shaun Harkin

(33) ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ Imam Was Bush-Era Partner For Mideast Peace by Megan Carpentier

(34) American Al Udeid Air Base In Qatar by Helen Ziegler

(35) Final Warning: A History Of The New World Order by David Rivera

(36) Obama’s Council On Foreign Relations Crew by Steve Watson

(37) Tragedy and Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time by Dr. Carroll Quigley

(38) The Curse of Canaan by Eustace Mullins (rip)

(39) Meet The Globalists Behind The Ground Zero Mosque Imam by Tony Cartalucci

(40) ‘We Think The Price Is Worth It’ by Rahul Mahajan

(41) Ruth Messinger, President Of American Jewish World Service (AJWS) Blogs for Maryland Hillel by Maryland Hillel

(42) Foreign Aid by Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism

(43) Rabbi Arthur Schneier, Honorary Director by The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society

(44) Fundamentalism And The Modern World by Sojourners Magazine

(45) Sojourners Took George Soros Money, Rev. Jim Wallis Acknowledges by EWTN News

(46) Israel Lobby Lied About George Soros Cash by Jessica Elgot

(47) The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, The Media and Political Power by Cliff Kincaid

(48) George Soros, Scourge of Asia? By Mahathir Mohamad and Neel Chowdhury, Fortune Magazine

(49) In Conversation With Michael Oren by The Aspen Institute

(50) Conservatives Continue To Accuse NYC Islamic Center Imam Of Being ‘Secret Radical’ by Media Matters For America

(51) Mission by US-Palestinian Partnership; Our Focus by US-Palestinian Partnership

(52) Let’s Help The Good Guys In The West Bank By Walter Isaacson

(53) Israel, Big Money And Obama – A Crown And The Chicago Zionists by Margaret Kimberly

(54) Do Good Fences Make Good Neighbors? By Dinesh D’Souza

(55) Take Action For Israel by Jewish Community Relations Council; Supporters by Jewish Community Relations Council

(56) New York City Reinvests $15 Million In Israel Bonds by Israel Bonds

(57) Alliance Bernstein Executive To Receive Honorary Fellowship From Hebrew University by American Friends of Hebrew University

(58) Parsing The Record Of Feisal Abdul Rauf by Anne Barnard, The New York Times

(59) NJ Mayor: Ground Zero Mosque Imam Is A Slumlord by CBS New York

(60) A New Manhattan Mosque Hopes To Heal by Marc Pitzke

(61) Sellers Invested With El-Gamal by Jennifer Gould Keil, New York Post

(62) Bal Harbour Couple Donates Ambulance To Israel by The Miami Herald

(63) Untangling The Bizarre CIA Links To The Ground Zero Mosque by Mark Ames, The New York Observer

(64) Cordoba House Advisors Include Liberal-Zionist Rabbis by Pulse Media

(65) The Maddening Israel I Love And Admire by Brad Hirschfield, Huffington Post

(66) Honorary Board of Advisors by OneVoice Movement

(67) Ground Zero Mosque II – The Anatomy Of A Globalist Propaganda Operation by Tony Cartalucci

(68) John Esposito, Islamophobia And The Ground Zero Mosque by Stephen Schwartz

(69) Justin Raimondo: An American Neo-Fascist by Stephen Schwartz

(70) Mosque Debate Isn’t Going Away by Devlin Barrett, The Wall Street Journal

(71) Brodsky Remains (Personally) Opposed To Ground Zero Mosque by David Freedlander, The New York Observer

(72) Brodsky Receives Key Endorsements In Race For Attorney General by People For Brodsky

(73) Where LI Pols Stand On The Ground Zero Mosque by Newsday

(74) Jewish Group Opposes Ground Zero Mosque by Associated Press

(75) ZOA: Don’t Increase Pain To Families Of 9/11 Victims Of Islamist Terror By Building Mosque Led by Extremist, Anti-US, Pro-Hamas Imam by Morton A. Klein

(76) Wiesenthal Center Opposes Ground Zero Mosque by Adam Dickter, The Jewish Week

(77) Palestinian Families Appeal To UN Over Israeli Construction Of ‘Museum Of Tolerance’ on Jerusalem’s Historic Mamilla Cemetery by DemocracyNow!

(78) NYC Community Board OKs Ground Zero Mosque Plans by The Boston Globe

(79) The Billionaires Bankrolling The Tea Party by Frank Rich, The New York Times

(80) Giving Thanks by Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

(81) Ground Zero Mosque Is Not A Religious Freedom Issue by Robert Spencer

(82) Major Pro-Israel Giver Funds ‘Jihad Watch’ by The Jerusalem Post

(83) Park51 Gets Bloomberg’s Support, But Not His Money by Michael Howard Saul, The Wall Street Journal

(84) Build The Cordoba Center? by David Harris, The Huffington Post

(85) How The ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ Fear Mongering Began by Justin Elliot, Salon

(86) Nadler: Attacks On Mosque ‘Shameful And Divisive’ by Justin Elliot, Salon

(87) Pro-Israel Dems Defend Raid by Jake Sherman, Politico

(88) NYC Pol Stringer Supports Ground Zero Mosque, Calls Tea Party Leader A Bigot by Stefanie Schappert, New York Examiner

(89) Salute To Israel Parade by In A Manhattan Minute

(90) Bush Aide Backs Obama On Mosque by Ben Smith, Politico

(91) Defining Victory For Israel by Michael Gerson, The Washington Post

(92) Statement On Cordoba House Controversy by Amy Spitalnick, J Street

(93) Utah Senator Backs Muslim Mosque by Lisa Wangsness, The Boston Globe

(94) A Very Mormon Chanukah by Ami Eden, JTA

(95) N.Y. Imam: Ground Zero Mosque Debate Is Stirring Islamophobia by Haaretz Service; ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ Imam Thanks US Jews For Support by Natasha Mozgovaya, Haaretz; Ground Zero Mosque Imam To Promote Mideast Tolerance by Jewish Journal, Haaretz

(96) Ahmadinejad: Qur’an Burning Zionist Plot by Press TV

(97) Imam Khameini: US And Zionism, Not Christianity, Responsible For Anti-Islamism by Mohamad Shmaysani, Al-Manar

(98): Terry Jones: A Clear And Present Danger by James Gundun, The Trench

(99): 25 Most Influential Evangelicals In America by TIME Magazine

(100) Directors by Christians United For Israel

(101) 180 Converts To Islam Because Of Qur’an Burning by Ahmed Ibrahem Ibrahem Buray, Islamic Society of Western Massachusetts

(102) Ground Zero Mosque – Bill O’Reilly’s View Keeps Muslim Mosque Controversy Alive by Heather Tooley, Yahoo News!

(103) Daisy Khan, An Eloquent Face Of Islam by Michael M. Gyrnbaum, The New York Times

(104) Top Muslims Condemn Ground Zero Mosque As A ‘Zionist Conspiracy’ by Raymond Ibrahim, Pajamas Media

(105) FAQ by Park51

(106) US To Boost Military Presence In Yemen by Press TV

(107) 9/11: Israel’s Grand Deception by Jonathan Azaziah

(108) Giuliani: Ground Zero ‘Wrong Place’ For A Mosque by Bob Unruh, World Net Daily

(109) The Zionist Murderers Of Iraq by Jonathan Azaziah

(110) Doctor On Call In Gaza by Caritas Internationalis

(111) Israel And India: Brothers In Occupation Of Kashmir by Jonathan Azaziah

(112) 9th Anniversary Of US Invasion Of Afghanistan: 4.9 Million Afghans Dead by Dr. Gideon Polya, Counter Currents

(113) Israel’s Cluster Bombs Still Devastate Lebanon by Al-Arabiya News

(114) ‘Flood-Hit Pakistan Running Out Of Funds’ by Press TV

(115) UN/AU Continues Somali Slaughter by Thomas C. Mountain, Counter Currents

Posted in CampaignsComments Off on PARK51: A ZIONIST PSYOP

9/11-ISRAEL’S GRAND DECEPTION

NOVANEWS

 

December 31, 2010

by Jonathan Azaziah

“…all of these men played their role in the orchestration of the tragic events on 9/11, whether it was the planning, the propagation of the mythologically false Zionist media-enforced official story…”

www.maskofzion.com

When an event occurs that changes the dynamics of the geopolitical spectrum, there is only one question that needs to be asked, no matter what kind of information is being force-fed to the public by the Zionist media: Who does this event benefit? The answer to this question is always: The Zionist elite.

The official story presented to the masses in the laughable (and criminally false) 9/11 Commission Report, overseen by Zionist Philip Zelikow, is so dubious and so nonsensical in its arrogance, it is truly amazing that the story was swallowed by the world’s population as truth to begin with. It doesn’t take a scientist, an architect, or an engineer to determine that something else other than planes brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7 at free fall speed on that infamous day. Al Qaeda, Arabic for “The Base” because it was the CIA’s base of operations in Afghanistan, was not behind the September Eleventh attacks, the Mossad and its Zionist criminal network were. Wake up.   

Shocking Prediction or Evidence of Planning?

On September 23, 1979, a very disturbing interview took place between Zionist Michael D. Evans and founder of the Mossad, Isser Harel. Evans asked the former director of the Mossad if (Islamic) terrorism will eventually come to America. Harel proceeds to tell the American Zionist that terrorism will indeed come to the United States, the attack will take place in New York City and it will be on its tallest building (1). Isser Harel was asked to step down from his post as Mossad chief by the architect of Al Nakbah and notorious racist David Ben Gurion because his terrorist tactics were drawing too much attention to the Zionist State.

Harel was behind the failed Lavon Affair of 1954, in which Egyptian-Israeli agents placed bombs inside British, American and Egyptian targets hoping Muslim groups would be blamed, and Western relations with Egypt would be irrevocably damaged. He was also responsible for ‘Operation Damocles’ which left scores of German scientists, writers, and public officials dead under the guise of Nazi-hunting (2). After his resignation and subsequent ‘retirement,’ Harel remained involved with Mossad, serving as a consultant and advisor to the terrorist agency before it released any information to the public (3).

Harel’s Hand Surfaces Again

Avraham Bendor, former head of Shin Bet, and Peter Zvi Malkin, agents that worked with Harel since he founded Mossad, gained control of the World Trade Center’s security through an agreement with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1987. The name of the company was Atwell Security of Tel Aviv, a subsidiary of Eisenberg Group, owned by Israeli tycoon and Mossad-connected arms dealer, Shaul Eisenberg. The agreement was terminated shortly thereafter for what Edward J. O’Sullivan, the Port Authority’s Director of Special Plans, called “a lack of satisfaction.”

The executive director of the Port Authority at the time, who exerted the pressure on O’Sullivan, was Stephen Berger, who has deep connections with other criminals in the Zionist network behind the 9/11 attacks, including Larry Silverstein, the current leaseholder of the World Trade Center (4).

It is illogical to believe that the executive director of the Port Authority, a Zionist himself, would hire an Israeli company directly connected to Mossad for World Trade Center security, then terminate the agreement for something as vague as ‘lack of satisfaction.’ It is logical however, when considering the facts that will be uniformly laid out later in this article, this agreement was initiated and kept in place just long enough, for blueprints and intelligence to be gathered for what was being planned by Mossad for the future.

The False Flag of 1993

Ramzi Yousef wasn’t the mastermind of the failed attack of February 26, 1993 just like Osama Bin Laden wasn’t the mastermind of the 9/11 operation. Yousef and his co-conspirators were trained in the art of bomb-making by high-ranking officials in the FBI. Not only was the FBI aware of the bomb that killed 6 people and injured 1,042, it supervised the process and had dealings with members of Yousef’s group as early as 1991 (5). Ahmad Ajaj, a Palestinian who was imprisoned in connection with the ‘93 bombing, was exposed by investigative reporter Robert Friedman as a Mossad agent who was trained in an Israeli prison.

It was Ajaj who was portrayed by the Zionist media as the ‘author’ of Al-Qaeda terrorist manuals based on information received by the FBI. This was a Mossad PSYOP to establish Ajaj as a ‘legitimate’ activist amongst Palestinians (6).  Tridata Corporation, a subsidiary of Systems Planning Corporation, owned by PNAC member and dual Israeli-American citizen Rabbi Dov Zakheim, was granted the contract to oversee the investigation which commenced after the botched bombing, and gained valuable intelligence with its unlimited access to the World Trade Center (7). Dov Zakheim would play a major role in the 9/11 attack and its cover-up.  

Project For A New American Century (PNAC)

In 1997, two neoconservative Zionist commentators, William Kristol and Robert Kagan founded an ultra-aggressive, militaristic think tank which developed and studied ideas that would expand America’s hegemonic dominion over the globe, in association with emphasizing the necessity of strong relations with the Zionist regime. Named “Project for the New American Century,” it was the single most influential entity in the policy-making decisions of the murderous Bush administration, with many of its members actually serving in the administration.

In September of 2000, PNAC released a document entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and Resources For a New Century” which discussed the removal of Saddam Hussein and the total destruction of Iraq as a nation due to its threat to Israel, and suggested America would need to “fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars” to further establish its dominance in the Middle East (8). The most disturbing part of the document however, came with its call for a New Pearl Harbor, “the process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic catalyzing event — like a New Pearl Harbor.” Nobody can deny 9/11 served that exact purpose, galvanizing the American masses behind illegal wars and genocides against Afghanistan and Iraq, all in the name of American patriotism.

Members Of PNAC

The authors of Rebuilding America’s Defenses (RAD) were credited as Zionists Donald Kagan (Robert Kagan’s father) and Gary Schmitt, but contributions were provided by many of its elite Zionist members including: Gary Bauer, Robert Bernstein, US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton, Rudy Boschwitz, former CIA agent William F. Buckley Jr., Frank Carlucci (CIA murderer of Prime Minister of the Congo Patrice Lemumba), war criminal Vice President Dick Cheney, Eliot Cohen, David Epstein, Frank Gaffney, Aaron Friedberg, Charles Krauthammer, aid to the Vice President Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Lewish Lehrman, Martin Peretz, Richard Perle (who was pegged by the FBI for spying for Israel in the 1970s, but never prosecuted), Norman Podhoretz, AIPAC official (Ed:  Rand Corporation/National Security Council member) Stephen Rosen, war criminal Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Randy Scheunemann, Pentagon official Abram Shulsky, architect of the first genocide against Iraq Stephen Solarz, Caspar Weinberger, architect of the second genocide against Iraq Paul Wolfowitz, Heritage Foundation Director Larry Wortzel, and Rabbi Dov Zakheim (9). All of these men played their role in the orchestration of the tragic events on 9/11, whether it was the planning, the propagation of the mythologically false Zionist media-enforced official story, or the aftermath with the illegal military occupations overseas. RAD can easily be found by placing the title into any Internet search engine.

Lies, Myths and Propaganda Of The Official Story

Any independent investigation into the events leading up to, occurring during, and following 9/11 will automatically lead to being labeled with the inflammatory and degrading title of “conspiracy theorist.” However, a closer look at the evidence proves it is the ludicrous official story that is the only real conspiracy theory. What the Zionist media has led the masses to believe is that 19 Muslim men, under orders of mastermind Osama Bin Laden, with funding from various Muslim charities that were fronts for terrorist operations, hijacked 4 planes with box cutters, bypassed the $400 billion air defense system of the United States, flew the planes into the Twin Towers and The Pentagon with another plane going down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania; the Twin Towers then collapsed followed by Building 7 (which wasn’t struck by a plane, but collapsed anyway) several hours later; despite the US government knowing absolutely nothing about the attacks, it knew who the hijackers were, who plotted the operation, where they were hiding, and how they carried out the terror in a matter of hours though no formal investigation was conducted. That is the actual, literal, widely-accepted mainstream theory. And it is pathetic.

There were no Arabic/Islamic names on the passenger lists released by United Airlines and American Airlines (10), so where did the Muslim men come from? At least 8 of the men which are said to be the suicidal hijackers by the FBI, are actually alive and well in various countries (11). Osama Bin Laden, whose name has been used to justify a genocidal occupation in Afghanistan that has claimed hundreds of thousands of innocent lives, is dead. It’s been a known fact worldwide that he’s dead for 9 years and it’s even been reported (perhaps out of intentional arrogance) by Mossad (12).

Osama Bin Laden worked for the CIA under the name of Tim Osman and had numerous personal and financial ventures with the Bush crime family and the corrupt Saudi regime, extracting funds from both of them and taking orders from US intelligence until his death at the very end of 2001. If the CIA ever had any intention of arresting Bin Laden to begin with, they would’ve done so when Bin Laden met with CIA officials in Dubai just two months before 9/11 (13). All of the reports for Muslim charities funding terror, the Al Qaeda videos, and the Bin Laden recordings have all been the work of two Mossad-connected contractors.

The Intel Center is run by Mossad agent Ben Venzke, and is notorious for releasing videos of an ‘Al-Qaeda’ operative named Adam Yahiye Gadahn, whose real name has been revealed as Adam Pearlman; he is the grandson of a former director of Israel’s propaganda arm, the ADL of B’nai B’rith (14). SITE Intelligence Group, founded by former IOF soldier Rita Katz, is the major provider of intelligence on ‘Islamic terror groups,’ not just for the Zionist media, but the government’s agencies as well (15).

The multi-layered, extremely advanced air defense system of the US along with the F-16 responses to any foreign activity in restricted airspace were rendered ineffective due to three main factors. The first factor, was Vice President Cheney issuing stand-down orders from the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (16). The second factor was the multiple war game exercises being conducted by the American military to deter the attention of the response from the actual attack (17).

And the final factor, perhaps the most important and most damning piece of evidence, is the subversion of US government computer networks by a company called P-Tech, controlled by yet another Mossad agent named Michael Goff. Goff’s father and grandfather were deeply involved in Zionist activities as their initiation into the B’nai B’rith Commonwealth Lodge in Worcester, Massachusetts confirms (18). Flight 93, which was the subject of the romanticized Hollywood film “United 93,” entirely written and produced by Zionists (Kate Solomon, Lloyd Levin, Paul Greengrass, Eric Fellner, Liza Chasin, Michael Bronner, Tim Bevan and Mairi Bett), did not crash into a field in Pennsylvania. It landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport as was reported by local media on 9/11 (19). The only plane that hit the Pentagon was an unmanned global hawk, and there is eyewitness testimony to substantiate this revelation (20).

A 32-story Spanish skyscraper, the Windsor building, burned for 24 hours but remained standing. The idea of buildings collapsing from fire is absolutely asinine. It has never happened in the history of modern architecture. 1,277 verified architectural and engineering professionals have already signed a petition demanding a reopening of the 9/11 investigation due to the illegitimacy of the mechanics in the official story. Professor Steven Jones of BYU discovered thermate and thermite (extremely destructive chemicals used in explosives) in samples he collected from Ground Zero, exposing the truth of a controlled demolition (21).

Ultra-Zionist Larry Silverstein, leaseholder of the Twin Towers and chief asset in the Mossad operation on 9/11, raised the eyebrows of many during an interview with PBS in September of 2002, “I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse (22).” ‘Pull it’ is common terminology used before the demolition of a building. Silverstein had much to gain from the destruction of the Twin Towers, and even more to gain with the destruction of Building 7, which went down at 5:20 p.m. though it wasn’t struck by a plane.

If there wasn’t anything questionable about the collapse, why wasn’t it mentioned in Zionist Zelikow’s distorted 9/11 Commission Report?

Privatization, Insider Trading and Profiteering

On July 23, 2001, Zionist Lewis Eisenberg, a prominent member of the pro-Israel Lobby, and the head of the Port Authority at the time, finalized the deal that would privatize the World Trade Center for the first time in its history (23). Ronald Lauder, of the notorious Zionist company Estee Lauder Cosmetics, is a major player in the pro-Israel Lobby, boasting active membership in the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, World Jewish Congress, Jewish National Fund, American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, Abraham Fund, Jewish Theological Seminary, and the ADL of B’nai B’rith.

He also donated a school named after him, The Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy and Strategy to the Interdisciplinary Center of Herzliya, a Mossad training ground. Lauder was the chairman of two organizations, the New York State Commission of Privatization and the New York State Research Council on Privatization, that introduced the concept of privatization to the Port Authority, and aggressively lobbied for it after the introduction (24).

The new leaseholders were United Jewish Appeal board member, ultra-Zionist Larry Silverstein, and former Haganah terrorist and Golani Brigade Commando, billionaire Frank Lowy, whose mall conglomerate Westfield America was guaranteed 427,000 square feet of retail floor space. Eisenberg, Lauder, Lowy and Silverstein all had close, friendly ties with Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, and Ariel Sharon; Silverstein even had phone conversations with the current Zionist entity prime minister every Sunday (25).

An anti-terrorism insurance contract was established with Swiss Re Insurance which would pay out $3.5 billion for a single terrorist attack, and an additional payment of the same amount for two terrorist attacks, hence why the Solomon Brothers Building, better known as Building 7 was destroyed. Silverstein adopted this policy six weeks before 9/11 (26). Silverstein’s battle with the insurance company was eventually decided in his favor by Zionist Judge Michael Mukasey, who determined the planes crashing into the Twin Towers constituted multiple terror attacks, and the fate of Building 7 wasn’t necessary for the ruling (27). Mukasey would play a crucial role in discharging the Mossad agents captured on 9/11, and would later go on to become Attorney General for war criminal George W. Bush’s administration (28).

Between August 26th and September 11th 2001, a group of financial speculators identified as Israeli citizens by the SEC, short sold 38 stocks and purchased put options in mass on Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AIG, Swiss Re and Munich Re Insurance, United Airlines and American Airlines. All of these companies were directly involved with the 9/11 attacks. The Israeli speculators were never investigated any further, and they were most certainly not arrested (29). 70,000 tons of World Trade Center steel were shipped to China and India for $120 a ton.

The purchaser of the scrap was Metals Management, owned by Zionist Alan D. Ratner (30). It is no coincidence that Zionist Michael Bloomberg (31), became mayor of New York right after the 9/11 assault. One of his first acts as mayor was to cover up AIG CEO and Zionist criminal Maurice Greenberg’s put option scam through Bear Stearns and Swiss Re Insurance (32). It was Bloomberg that awarded the clean-up contract to Ratner’s company so the steel would be disposed of and prevent its examination by NIST, which was controlled by yet another Zionist, Stephen Cauffman (33), the ‘Leader of the Structures Group of the Materials and Construction Research Division’ according to the official NIST website.        

John O’Neil: Sabotaged And Murdered

His name is one not known by the majority of the American people, but John P. O’Neil knew more about Tim Osman (Bin Laden) than any other person in the world. He became the FBI’s counter-terrorism chief in 1995 and quickly rose through the ranks. Because of his unorthodox investigative methods, and a tendency to go against protocol, it didn’t take long for John O’Neil to come into direct conflict with his superiors. The FBI higher-ups continuously blocked O’Neil from digging deeper into the ‘Al Qaeda’ network, starting with the bombing of Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia (34).

It is of extreme significance to note, that the Zionist entity typically and erroneously blamed the attack on Khobar Towers on Hezbollah, the Lebanese Resistance movement. The same type of military grade explosives used in the truck bomb at Khobar Towers, was used in the 1983 marine barracks bombing in Lebanon and the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. These two incidents were also blamed on Hezbollah by the usurping Zionist regime.

The marine barracks bombing has now been linked to Israel by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky (35), and the assassination of Hariri has been extensively exposed as an Israeli operation by Hezbollah Secretary General, his eminence, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah (36).

After the bombings of the US embassies in Nairobi and Tanzania, which are now also linked to CIA and Mossad (37), John O’Neil was eager to be involved in the investigation due to the so-called Al Qaeda fingerprints on the attack. The ‘superiors’ in Washington had a severe dislike for O’Neil however, and the NY FBI office where O’Neil worked was left out of the loop. This jaded O’Neil even further, and in October of 2000, the beginning of the end came for O’Neil when he came into conflict with Zionist Ambassador Barbara Bodine over the USS Cole bombing. O’Neil suspected the truth of the matter was larger than he ever imagined, and that Al Qaeda may not be the main culprit (38).

Bodine received her orders to undermine O’Neil’s team by Zionist Secretary of State Madeline Albright, the fervent defender of the genocidal sanctions against Iraq. A former CIA agent echoed O’Neil’s suspicions when he said O’Neil and his team were kicked out of Yemen because they were getting close to uncovering that the US Navy ship wasn’t bombed by Al Qaeda, but an Israeli cruise missile launched from a Zionist Dolphin-class submarine (39).O’Neil would return home to the United States frustrated, 20 pounds lighter and in doubt of his future in the intelligence community. He continued investigating the USS Cole bombing, but was ordered to cease and desist when the FBI pulled out of Yemen.

Less than a month before the September 11th attacks, John O’Neil was forced to step down from his position as counter-terrorism chief of the FBI due to pressure from the Bush administration and a smear campaign from his FBI bosses (40). He was approached by Zionist Jerome Hauer of Kroll Inc. founded by Zionist Jules B. Kroll immediately after he reluctantly resigned from the FBI.

Kroll had gained control of the World Trade Center’s security after the 1993 false flag attack, and it became a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh-McLennan Companies and AIG, owned by aforementioned Zionist 9/11 accomplice Maurice Greenberg, and later his son, Jeffrey Greenberg. The family of Jerome Hauer had deep Zionist fund-raising roots in New York’s Jewish community, and Hauer himself was very close with Larry Silverstein. Hauer was responsible for placing the Office of Emergency Management inside Building 7, much to the dismay of the NYPD. Classified information linking the CIA and the Zionist companies that profited from insider trading were located in this office (41).

The younger brother of George W. Bush, Marvin Bush, was a director of the other firm with a security contract for the Twin Towers called Securacom, later known as Stratasec from 1993 until 2000. A year before Bush stepped down, his cousin, Wirt D. Walker III became Stratasec CEO (42). Kroll and Securacom were behind the mysterious power-down the weekend prior to 9/11 where masked men entered the Towers with excessively large amounts of wire that they claimed would be used for rerouting internet cables (43). Though Larry Silverstein had breakfast in the ‘Windows on the World’ restaurant on the 107th Floor of the North Tower every morning (44), he was conveniently absent that fateful morning. Jerome Hauer, Maurice Greenberg and his son, Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker, Jules Kroll, Frank Lowy, Ronald Lauder and several other key Zionist assets in the Mossad operation were not present in the World Trade Center on 9/11. John O’Neil however, went to work like it was a regular day.

The former FBI counter-terrorism chief died in the World Trade Center. Due to the affiliations of the Zionist personalities involved in smearing him and hiring him as a consultant with Kroll, it would appear O’Neil was murdered.

Re-Enter Zakheim And Lauder

Israel is the pioneer of drone technology like remote-controlled planes and armored assault vehicles, and has made billions off of video game style murder in occupied Palestine, occupied Kashmir, occupied Iraq, and Lebanon (45). Remote-controlled vehicles are not something out of a sci-fi film, they are an everyday reality, being used by oppressive regimes worldwide to terrorize civilian populations.

Rabbi Dov Zakheim, the owner of a company that produced such technology, was also Pentagon comptroller from 2001-2004. Zakehim was in charge of the Department of Defense’s flow of money and on the day before 9/11/01, war criminal Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2.3 trillion had vanished. By the time Zakheim stepped down, another trillion dollars had gone missing, totaling $3.3 trillion that seemingly couldn’t be accounted for. But when the Zionist entity received a weapons package in the form of a military surplus from Bush’s neo-conservative Zionist administration, including a fleet of F-16 and F-15 fight jets, it was none other than Zakheim who negotiated the deal. These new planes would be used in brutal Israeli genocides inflicted against Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2008-09 (46).

The name of Zakheim’s aforesaid company is Systems Planning Corporation (SPC), a defense contractor that specialized in new age warfare, and specifically, the implementation of remote control software into military aircraft. SPC manufactures a Flight Termination System (FTS) equipped with long range transmitters, which allows a flight to be hijacked and controlled at any time. Shortly before 9/11, Zakheim’s SPC contracted with an air force base in Florida to test the FTS on at least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of a tanker deal between Boeing and the Pentagon.

Boeing, according to an overview on its website, has had a working relationship with the Zionist entity for over 60 years. Zakheim’s company reformatted the planes with several key parts, and it is explicitly crucial to note, Flight 175 which struck the South Tower and Flight 11 which struck the North Tower, were both 767s. In photos of the remains of Flight 175, there is an object under the fuselage that sharply resembles SPC’s FTS. Comparing the pictures of the demolished ‘hijacked’ airplanes and the tankers on SPC’s website, it is impossible to ignore the likelihood that the airliners were actually Zakheim’s refitted, reformatted Pentagon-Boeing tankers (47).

Ronald Lauder, the chairman of the New York State Commission of Privatization and the New York State Research Council on Privatization, wrote a book in 1992 called “Privatization for New York: Competing for a Better Future.” In 1994, Zionist Lauder suggested to New York Governor George Pataki, whom he had given excessive donations to (48), that privatizing airports would bring in huge revenue for New York. Pataki, intrigued by the idea, commissioned Lauder to bring his ambitious proposal to life. Lauder had his sights set on Stewart Airport in Newburgh, New York. On March 31st, 2000, Lauder vaunted that New York became the first state in the nation to privatize a commercial airport, awarding the contract to UK-based National Express Group, which at the time, was owned by Zionist William Rollason (49). Stewart Airport, is where the paths of Flight 175 and Flight 11 oddly and chillingly converged on 9/11 (50).

No Arab names on the passenger lists. The suicide hijackers turning up alive. The erratic flight paths of the airliners that became frighteningly precise before impact. The so-called hijackers who were exceptionally poor pilots, though described as excellent by the Zionist media (51). Rabbi Zakheim’s corporation that produces Flight Termination Systems, along with the strange events surrounding him immediately before and after 9/11. Flight 11 flying directly into the secure computer room in the North Tower of Marsh-McLennan Company/Kroll, the company of Zionist partners Jules Kroll and Maurice Greenberg (52).

Mass murderer Netanyahu, who was in New York City on 9/11, stating the attacks benefitted Israel and swung American opinion in the favor of the Zionist entity (53). Dulles, Newark, and Logan airport security being controlled by a single Israeli company, ICTS/Huntleigh, owned by former Shin Bet agents Menachem Atzmon and Ezra Harel. ICTS never being questioned by the 9/11 Commission (54). Ronald Lauder’s privatization exploits. When a coincidence turns into a string of coincidences, it ceases to be a string of coincidences, and it becomes a pattern. In the case of 9/11, there is an undeniable pattern of criminal Zionist involvement.

Michael Chertoff: Savior Of The Israeli Spy Ring

One of the more telling anomalies on September 11th were the seismic spikes recorded by  Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory just prior to the collapse of the Twin Towers (55). Combine this with the hundreds of eyewitness accounts (many of them New York firefighters) that state they heard explosions resembling bombs detonating before the collapse of the Towers (56), in addition to the piles of molten metal found in the footprint of where the Towers once stood, burning at temperatures that jet fuel at its hottest cannot produce (57), and there is convincing, corroborated evidence that a controlled demolition is the cause of the World Trade Center collapse. In an investigative report by Carl Cameron of Fox News, 60 Israeli spies, in the fields of military intelligence and explosive ordinance were detained on 9/11, and more than 140 Israeli spies were detained shortly before the events (58).

The spies detained on that day, tested positive for explosives, including the ill-famed five dancing Israelis who claimed to be in New York to ‘document the event.’ They were pulled over on the George Washington Bridge by the FBI, and their van tested positive for explosives as well (59). Their names were Yaron Shmuel, Omer Marmari, Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, and Oded Ellner. They worked for a counterfeit moving company named Urban Moving Systems, owned by Israeli Dominick Otto Suter. Once federal agents apprehended the dancing Israelis, they returned to the offices of Urban Moving Systems to interrogate Suter, but he had already departed. These men were discovered to be Mossad agents, and the moving company was a Mossad front to gather intelligence on various Arab organizations in the Tri-State Area (60).

The large majority of the Israeli spies were posing as art students, an ancient Israeli spying technique started by early asset to the false flag on 9/11, Mossad spy master, Peter Zvi Malkin (61). Many of them were also employees of Amdocs, an Israeli company founded by Zionist criminal Morris Kahn, which collects processing data for 90% of the phone calls, emails, and text messages in America, including several agencies of the federal government, as well as Comverse Technology headed by Zionist Kobi Alexander, which provides wire-tapping technology for many law enforcement agencies across the US (62). On September 4, 2001, Zim Integrated Shipping Services, partially owned by the Israeli government, paid $50,000 to break its lease and move its headquarters to Norfolk, Virginia. Zim’s officials were never questioned regarding what prompted them to move a week before the most devastating ‘terror attack’ on American soil in history (63).

Four thousand Israelis were warned via text message of impending attacks in the New York area by Zionist company Odigo, founded by Israeli brothers, Avner and Maskit Ronen. Only three months after 9/11, the Ronen brothers negotiated a deal with Kobi Alexander’s Comverse, which already had a minute stake in Odigo, to be fully bought out (64). Alexander, a former Israeli intelligence officer, along with fellow Comverse executives, William Sorin and David Kreinberg, both of whom served in Israeli intelligence with Alexander, were on the run from US prosecutors after they were brought up on charges of securities, wire and mail fraud. In 2006, they were strangely allowed to leave the US despite several warrants for their arrests. They hid all over the world, including Sri Lanka and Namibia before being apprehended (65).

The reason for the poor investigation of these anomalistic occurrences, (or the lack thereof for that matter), despite all of these personalities and corporations being deeply connected to the Zionist entity, is one man: Zionist Michael Chertoff. Chertoff, a dual-citizen of the illegal Zionist state like most of the criminals connected to the plot on 9/11, is the son of impassioned Zionists.

His father, Rabbi Gershon Baruch Chertoff, was the last in a long line of a family of Talmudic rabbis from Russia, and his mother, Livia Eisen, was the first hostess of El Al, and one of the earliest Mossad operatives, working under the aforementioned Isser Harel. Chertoff’s mother was instrumental in Operation Magic Carpet, which brought Jewish families from Yemen into Israel for cheap labor. Due to the malicious anti-Arab sentiment of Zionism, the Zionist leadership felt the need to de-Arabize the Yemeni Jews, and authorized the kidnaping of Yemeni babies to then be delivered to European parents to strip them of their culture and their ethnic roots (66). Michael Chertoff’s wife, Meryl, is a chairwoman of an ADL of B’nai B’rith regional organization in New Jersey.

Prior to becoming the second Secretary of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff was chief of the criminal division of the Justice Department from 2001-2003. It was Chertoff who blocked the efforts of several agents across the FBI’s ranks to investigate the hundreds of Mossad spies detained in connection to the attacks on 9/11. He also supervised the destruction and confiscation of evidence that would have linked Israel and the US to the attacks like videotapes, eyewitness accounts, written testimonies and debris from Ground Zero.

Within months, all of the Israelis in custody, were released, with no coverage from the Zionist media, and no objection from Bush’s government. Though Chertoff had no problem using torture while interrogating foreign nationals (67), these Israeli spies were subjected to no such action, and upon their release, were quietly sent back to the terror state of Israel (68). To finalize the cover up and take the public’s attention off of the Israeli spy ring, Zionist Chertoff orchestrated the capture of 1,100 Muslim citizens, tourists and immigrants, falsely labeling them as suspects connected to the September 11th attacks. These innocent people were physically abused in secret facilities, denied the right to legal counsel, psychologically abused in secret military tribunals before they were deported, or released back into society after these criminal acts were committed against them. Chertoff was also the primary author of the Patriot Act, an Orwellian piece of legislation written months before 9/11, and signed into law on October 26, 2001 (69).

A New Analysis

An operation 20 years in the making, the attacks of September 11th in New York City and Washington D.C. were a false flag carried out by the Mossad, its close-knit network of wealthy sayanim (70) and criminal elements within the Bush administration, the FBI and the CIA with dual loyalty to the genocidal state of Israel. Through espionage, privatization, and infiltration, this Zionist criminal network gained control of the World Trade Center, its security, as well as several government communications outlets which were subverted once the terror operation commenced.

Using flight termination system technology in remote controlled tanker jets and nano-thermate/thermite charges strategically placed in the Twin Towers and Building 7 by its experts in military intelligence and explosive ordinance, the criminal network brought down the World Trade Center by controlled demolition.

Using the Zionist media to incite fear and hysteria amongst the public through disinformation, the criminal network successfully covered up the Zionist regime’s mass murder in Occupied Palestine during the height of the Second Intifada. With the mission accomplished, and the public totally programmed and petrified of the unknown, the criminal network advanced with the next phase of its PNAC agenda: expanding executive power in America through totalitarian legislation and securing Israel through multiple regional wars.

To complete the cover up of the attacks, the criminal network used its sayanim in NIST and the 9/11 Commission, as well as top sayan (singular form of sayanim) Michael Chertoff to obliterate proofs of Israeli-US involvement and to perpetuate the lies already enforced by the media. For the families of the 2,973 innocents that died in the attacks, the criminal network employed its agent, the Zionist Kenneth Feinberg, to set up the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund. Under Feinberg’s sinister direction, each family received an average of $1.25 million, but they waved their right to sue the government for criminal negligence (71).

The criminal network used the Zionist media to dub its war, the “War on Terror,” taking a page right out of Benjamin Netanyahu’s book, ‘Terrorism: How The West Can Win,’ published in 1986 (72). This would allow the criminal network to extend its occupations abroad indefinitely, since the enemy had never been clearly identified. With American troops conducting genocidal operations in Afghanistan, the Patriot Act being passed along with the creation of Homeland Security, granting immeasurable governing power to the Zionist administration, the involvement of Israel and America in the attacks silenced, and the next destruction of a nation being planned for Iraq, the criminal network slowly disbanded, eventually finding their way back to the Zionist entity, or fading into obscurity elsewhere like Michael Chertoff’s cousin, Benjamin Chertoff, who aided the criminal network by smearing the campaign for 9/11 truth (73). 

On a secondary, but still vitally important level, the Zionist criminal network, specifically the Mossad and the CIA, strengthened its hegemonic domination of the world even further by profiting enormously from reorganizing and taking full control of the amerceable heroin trade in Afghanistan and setting up business operations to take control of the neighboring oil fields in Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan (74).

Conclusion

Scholars like Noam Chomsky and the late Howard Zinn have suggested that the 9/11 events are ‘in the past’ and seeking the truth as to who perpetrated the attacks ‘do not have any significance’ (75). If your family was murdered, would you think their deaths were in the past and identifying the murderer or murderers wouldn’t have any significance? Their position is ridiculous at best and collusive at worst. 9/11 is the reason over one million civlians have been murdered in the last 9 years in Occupied Afghanistan. 9/11 is the reason 1.5 million innocents in Occupied Iraq have been slaughtered.

It is the reason for increased billion dollar aid packages to Israel and increases in brutality by the Zionist entity in Occupied Palestine. It is the reason behind full US support and encouragement of the Zionist aggression used against Lebanon in 2006, which resulted in the genocide of over 1,200 Lebanese civilians. It is the reason for drone attacks in Pakistan which murder civilians daily. It is the reason for covert wars which are slowly becoming genocides in Yemen and Somalia.  It is the reason for every future act of aggression, all to be waged on the basis of ‘the war on terror.’ Investigating the criminals behind 9/11 isn’t just significant, it is ESSENTIAL to the worldwide pursuit for truth, peace, justice, and freedom.

9/11 was not blowback. 9/11 was not done by Al Qaeda, an organization which doesn’t even exist (76). 9/11 was a Mossad-CIA intelligence operation, and the evidence exposed here is only the tip of the iceberg. Journalists and activists like Christopher Bollyn, Wayne Madsen, Jerry Mazza, academic Joel Kovel, and Freedom Flotilla activist Kenneth O’Keefe have all exposed Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks, but there needs to be more efforts like those put forth by these brave men.

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, former head of Pakistan’s ISI Hamid Gul, and former Director of Studies at the Army War College Alan Sabrosky have also gone on record stating Mossad was behind 9/11 (77). War criminal Barack Obama’s new Regulation Czar, Zionist Cass Sunstein, has said that 9/11 truth groups need to be infiltrated because they pose a threat to the government’s ‘anti-terrorism’ policies (78). That means seeking 9/11 truth is hurting the occupiers, oppressors, murderers, thieves, and financial gangsters that have turned the poor and downtrodden masses into their slaves. It means that the truth is winning.

It is the duty of every activist, journalist and scholar fighting to end tyranny in the occupied nations of the Middle East to investigate, discuss and expose 9/11 due to it being the pretext for which the fight to end tyranny stems from. Once the people of the world know the pretext was a lie, they will know everything that followed it was a lie too. They will know that Muslims, Arabs and Islam itself aren’t the enemy, but the US-Zionist alliance that has sat at the top of the world’s power structure through a reign of terror for what seems like the duration. With this newfound knowledge, the people will then unite in truth and revolution, and the Zionist criminal network that orchestrated 9/11, will be eliminated once and for all.

~ The End ~  

Sources

(1) Is America In Bible Prophecy? By Michael D. Evans, interviewed by Deborah Caldwell

(2) Targeted Killings – A Retro Fashion Very Much in Vogue by Yossi Melman; Israel’s Secret Wars by Benny Morris and Ian Black

(3) Isser Harel: Obituary by Eric Silver

(4) The Architecture of Terror: Mapping The Network Behind 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn

(5) Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed by Paul DiRienzo, Frank Morales and Chris Flash

(6) Mossad Link Found To One Of Key 9/11 Hijackers by Michael Collins Piper

(7) Dov Zakheim retires from Booz Allen Hamilton by Jerry Mazza

(8) The High Priests of War by Michael Collins Piper

(9) The “New World Order” by B.W. Holmes

(10) Fifty questions on 9/11 by Pepe Escobar

(11) Hijack Suspects Alive And Well by BBC News; Stranger than Fiction by Dr. Albert D. Pastore Phd.   

(12) Report: Bin Laden Already Dead by FOX News; Israeli Intelligence: Bin Laden is Dead, Heir Has Been Chosen by World Tribune

(13) When Osama Bin Laden was Tim Osman by J. Orlin Grabbe; The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administratin and 9/11 by David Ray Griffin; Report: Bin Laden Treated At US Hospital by Elizabeth Bryant

(14) Mossad Agent Pearlman Releases Phony “Al-Qaeda Tape” by Paul Joseph Watson

(15) Is Israel Controlling Phony Terror News? By Gordon Duff and Brian Jobert

(16) Norman Mineta Confirms That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11 by Aaron Dykes

(17) Crossing The Rubicon by Michael C. Ruppert

(18) How Mossad Deceived The US Military on 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn

(19) UAL Flight 93 Landed Safely At Cleveland Hopkins Airport by Channel 9 News Staff of Cleveland

(20) Pentagon Eyewitness: Official 9/11 Legend Exposed by Christopher Bollyn

(21) BYU Physics Prof Finds Thermate in WTC Physical Samples, Building Collapses an Inside Job by Jacob Hamblin

(22) The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions by David Ray Griffin

(23) The Republican Jewish Coalition and the pro-Israel Lobby by Bob Feldman; The World Trade Center Deal Remains In Doubt by Charles V. Bagli; Silverstein Recovers: Dark Horse May Win World Trade Center by Andrew Rice

(24) Green Acres: George Pataki, Ronald Lauder And The Politics Of New Beginnings by The New York Press

(25) Silverstein Incriminates 9-11 WTC Lies by Dick Eastman; Up In Smoke by Sara Leibovich-Dar

(26) Insurers Debate: One Accident or Two by Bloomberg News

(27) As Judge Leaves for Law Firm, His Legacy Is Remembered by Joseph Goldstein

(28) Bush Nominates Zionist Judge Involved in Key 9-11 Judgements to Serve as U.S. Attorney General by Christopher Bollyn

(29) Israeli Investors Made Huge Profits From 9/11 Event by Walter Storch; Suspicious Trading Points to Advance Knowledge by Big Investors of September 11th Attacks by Barry Grey

(30) World Trade Center Scrap Sails for India, China by Reuters; WTC Steel To Rise Again In Indian Buildings by Reuters

(31) In Israel, Bloomberg Shows His Support by Dina Kraft

(32) Loot The US Treasury by Tom Heneghan

(33) NIST’s Fraudulent “Final Report on the Collapse of WTC 7:” A Criminal Fraud at Taxpayer Expense by Christopher Bollyn

(34) Investigating Khobar Towers: How a Saudi Deception Protected Bin Laden by Gareth Porter

(35) By Way of Deception: The Making and Unmaking of a Mossad Officer by Victor Ostrovsky and Clair Hoy

(36) Sayyed Nasrallah: Israel Behind Hariri’s Assassination by Hussein Assi, Al Manar

(37) Questions Mount in Kenya, Tanzania Bombings by Martin McLaughlin

(38) Who Killed 9/11 Hero John O’Neil? by The Daily Brew

(39) Clearing the Baffles for 9/11 by Wayne Madsen

(40) Who Killed John O’Neil? (Documentary) by Ryan Thurston (writer) and Ty Rauber (producer and director)

(41) Who is Jerome Hauer? by Christopher Bollyn; Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly into the CIA’s Highest Ranks by Michael C. Ruppert

(42) Secrecy Surrounds 9/11 Investigation by Craig Cox

(43) ‘Power Down’ Condition at the WTC on the Weekend Preceding 9/11 by Scott Forbes; 9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush by What Really Happened?

(44) The Weekend Interview with Larry Silverstein: Rebuilding Ground Zero by Steven Malanga

(45) Drones and Death: The Israeli Connection by Ed Kinane; Israel Paves The Way For Remote Control Killing by Jonathan Cook

(46) Following Zakheim And Pentagon Trillions to Israel by Jerry Mazza

(47) The Mastermind Behind 9/11? By Stephen St. John

(48) Pataki’s Favorite Conservatives by Wayne Barrett

(49) Governor Pataki Hands Stewart Airport Keys to National Express by New York State Department of Transportation Office of Media Relations

(50) 9-11: Animation Showing Military Precision of Flight Paths by Looking Glass News

(51) Operation 9/11: No Suicide Pilots by Carol A. Valentine

(52) The Fleecing of America: 9/11 and The Crisis On Wall Street by Christopher Bollyn

(53) Report: Netanyahu Says 9/11 Terror Attacks Good For Israel by Haaretz and Reuters

(54) More Questions on 9/11 by Pepe Escobar; All 9/11 Airports Serviced Owned By One Israeli Owned Company by What Really Happened?

(55) 9/11 Seismic Data Refutes Official Explanation by Christopher Bollyn

(56) The September 11th Records by The New York Times

(57) Me, Art Bell, and 9/11 by Lisa Guliani

(58) Carl Cameron Investigates Part 1-4: Israel Is Spying In And On The U.S. by Fox News

(59) Mossad – The Israeli Connection To 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn

(60) Five Israelis Were Seen Filming As Jet Liners Ploughed Into The Twin Towers by Neil Mackay

(61) Peter Zvi Malkin, Israeli Agent Who Captured Adolf Eichmann, Dies by Margalit Fox

(62) An Enigma: Vast Israeli Spy Network Dismantled in the US by Sylvain Cypel, translated by Malcolm Garris

(63) Profile: Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. by History Commons

(64) Why Was Kobi Alexander Allowed to Flee: The Israeli Fugitive, Odigo, and the Forewarning of 9/11 by Christopher Bollyn; Myth-Debunking Snopes Obscures Israel’s Role In 9/11 by Maidhc Ó Cathail

(65) Former Comverse Chief Alexander Arrested in Namibia by Allan Dodds Frank and Bob Van Voris

(66) The Missing Yemenite Children by Doron A. Tal

(67) Chertoff OKs Torture: Bizarre Choice for Homeland Czar Deep in Scandal by James P. Tucker

(68) Controlled Press Conceals Chertoff’s Israeli Roots by Christopher Bollyn

(69) Failing Upwards: The Rise of Michael Chertoff by Mike Whitney

(70) Sayanim – Israeli Operatives in the U.S. by Jeff Gates

(71) From Agent Orange, to 9/11, to BP: Kenneth Feinberg is Master of Disaster by Sander Hicks

(72) How (Not) To Win by Christopher Dickey

(73) 9/11 and Chertoff: Cousin Wrote 9/11 Propaganda For Popular Mechanics by Christopher Bollyn

(74) Military Escalation: From Afghanistan To the Caspian Sea and Central Asia by Rick Rozoff; Intel Expert Says 9-11 Looks Like A Hollywood Show by Christopher Bollyn
                           
(75) An Open Letter to Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn by Atheo

(76) Al-Qaeda Is Fiction: The Organization Doesn’t Exist by Mark Perkel

(77) Ex-Italy Pres – 9-11 Was CIA/Mossad Operation by the Staff of American Free Press; Ex-ISI Chief Gul Exposes 9/11 Inside Job by Paul Joseph Watson; Sabrosky Interview Ties Israel to 9/11 by Gordon Duff

(78) Obama Staffer Wants ‘Cognitive Infiltration’ of 9/11 Truth Groups by Daniel Tencer

Posted in USAComments Off on 9/11-ISRAEL’S GRAND DECEPTION

IRANIAN NUKES-THE PHANTOM MENACE

NOVANEWS

December 31, 2010

by Veterans Today 

Fantasies, falsehoods, and fear-mongering about Iran’s nuclear program

Dec 31, 2010 

Nima Shirazi

“To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies — all this is indispensably necessary.”

– George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four

Facts rarely get in the way of American and Israeli fear-mongering and jingoism, especially when it comes to anti-Iran propaganda. For nearly thirty years now, U.S. and Zionist politicians and analysts, along with some of their European allies, have warned that Iranian nuclear weapons capability is just around the corner and that such a possibility would not only be catastrophic for Israel with its 400 nuclear warheads and state-of-the-art killing power supplied by U.S. taxpayers, but that it would also endanger regional dictatorships, Europe, and even the United States.

If these warnings are to be believed, Iran is only a few years away from unveiling a nuclear bomb…and has been for the past three decades. Fittingly, let’s begin in 1984.

An April 24, 1984 article entitled “‘Ayatollah’ Bomb in Production for Iran in United Press International referenced aJane’s Intelligence Defense Weekly report warning that Iran was moving “very quickly” towards a nuclear weapon and could have one as early as 1986.

Two months later, on June 27, 1984, in an article entitled “Senator says Iran, Iraq seek N-Bomb,” Minority Whip of the U.S. Senate Alan Cranston was quoted as claiming Iran was a mere seven years away from being able to build its own nuclear weapon. In April 1987, the Washington Post published an article with the title “Atomic Ayatollahs: Just What the Mideast Needs – an Iranian Bomb,” in which reporter David Segal wrote of the imminent threat of such a weapon.

The next year, in 1988, Iraq issued warnings that Tehran was at the nuclear threshold.

By late 1991, Congressional reports and CIA assessments maintained a “high degree of certainty that the government of Iran has acquired all or virtually all of the components required for the construction of two to three nuclear weapons.” In January 1992, Benjamin Netanyahu told the Knesset that “within three to five years, we can assume that Iran will become autonomous in its ability to develop and produce a nuclear bomb.”

Furthermore, a February 1992 report by the U.S. House of Representatives suggested that Iran would have two or three operational nuclear weapons by April 1992.

In March 1992, The Arms Control Reporter reported that Iran already had four nuclear weapons, which it had obtained from Russia. That same year, the CIA predicted an Iranian nuclear weapon by 2000, then later changed their estimate to 2003.

A May 1992 report in The European claims that “Iran has obtained at least two nuclear warheads out of a batch officially listed as ‘missing from the newly independent republic of Kazakhstan.’”

Speaking on French television in October 1992, then-Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres warned the international community that Iran would be armed with a nuclear bomb by 1999. The following month, the New York Times reported that Israel was confident Iran would “become a nuclear power in a few years unless stopped.”

The same year, Robert Gates, then-director of the CIA, addressed the imminent threat of Iranian nuclear weapons. “Is it a problem today?” he asked at the time, “probably not. But three, four, five years from now it could be a serious problem.”

On January 23, 1993, Gad Yaacobi, Israeli envoy to the UN, was quoted in the Boston Globe, claiming that Iran was devoting $800 million per year to the development of nuclear weapons. Then, on February 24, 1993, CIA director James Woolsey said that although Iran was “still eight to ten years away from being able to produce its own nuclear weapon” the United States was concerned that, with foreign assistance, it could become a nuclear power earlier.

That same year, international press went wild with speculation over Iranian nuclear weapons. In the Spring of 1993,U.S. News & World Report, the New York Times, the conservative French weekly Paris Match, and Foreign Report all claimed Iran had struck a deal with North Korea to develop nuclear weapons capability, while U.S. intelligence analysts alleged an Iranian nuclear alliance with Ukraine. Months later, the AFP reported Switzerland was supplying Iran with nuclear weapons technology, while the Intelligence Newsletter claimed that the French firm CKD was delivering nuclear materials to Iran and U.S. News and World Report accused Soviet scientists working in Kazakhstan of selling weapons-grade uranium to Iran. By the end of 1993, Theresa Hitchens and Brendan McNally of Defense News and National Defense University analyst W. Seth Carus had reaffirmed CIA director Woolsey’s prediction “that Iran could have nuclear weapons within eight to ten years.”

In January 1995, John Holum, director of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, testified before Congress that “Iran could have the bomb by 2003,” while Defense Secretary William Perry unveiled a grimmer analysis, stating that “Iran may be less than five years from building an atomic bomb, although how soon…depends how they go about getting it.” Perry suggested that Iran could potentially buy or steal a nuclear bomb from one of the former Soviet states in “a week, a month, five years.”

The New York Times reported that “Iran is much closer to producing nuclear weapons than previously thought, and could be less than five years away from having an atomic bomb, several senior American and Israeli officials say,” a claim repeated by Greg Gerardi in The Nonproliferation Review (Vol. 2, 1995).

Benjamin Netanyahu, in his 1995 book “Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat the International Terrorist Network,” wrote,”The best estimates at this time place Iran between three and five years away from possessing the prerequisites required for the independent production of nuclear weapons.”

At the same time, a senior Israeli official declared, “If Iran is not interrupted in this program by some foreign power, it will have the device in more or less five years.” After a meeting in Jerusalem between Defense Secretary Perry and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, they announced that Iran would have a nuclear bomb in seven to 15 years.

On February 15, 1996, then-Israeli Foreign Minister Ehud Barak told members of the UN Security Council that Iran would be producing nuclear weapons by 2004.

On April 29, 1996, Israel’s then-Prime Minister Shimon Peres claimed in an interview with ABC that “the Iranians are trying to perfect a nuclear option” and would “reach nuclear weapons” in four years. By 1997 the Israelis confidentlypredicted an active Iranian nuclear bomb by 2005.

In March 1997, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency director John Holum again attested to a House panel that Iran would develop a nuclear weapon sometime between 2005 and 2007.

The following month, according to a report in Hamburg’s Welt am Sonntag, the German Federal Intelligence Service (BND) believed Iran had an active nuclear weapons development program and would be able to produce nuclear weapons by 2002, “although that timeframe could be accelerated if Iran acquires weapons-grade fissile material on the black market.” Eight days later, in early May 1997, a Los Angeles Times article quoted a senior Israeli intelligence official as stating that Iran would be able to make a nuclear bomb by “the middle of the next decade.”

On June 26, 1997, the U.S. military commander in the Persian Gulf, General Binford Peay, stated that, were Iran to acquire access to fissile material, it would obtain nuclear weapons “sometime at the turn of the century, the near-end of the turn of the century.”

In September 1997, Jane’s Intelligence Defense Review reported that former U.S. Secretary of State Warren Christopher declared, “we know that since the mid-1980s, Iran has had an organized structure dedicated to acquiring and developing nuclear weapons,” as then-Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned that the Iranian nuclear technology program “may be the most dangerous development in the 21st century.”

Writing in the Jerusalem Post on April 9, 1998, Steve Rodan claimed “Documents obtained by the Jerusalem Post show Iran has four nuclear bombs.” The next day, U.S. State Department spokesperson James Rubin addressed this allegation, stating, “There was no evidence to substantiate such claims.”

On October 21, 1998, General Anthony Zinni, head of U.S. Central Command, said Iran could have deliverable nuclear weapons by 2003. “If I were a betting man,” he said, “I would say they are on track within five years, they would have the capability.”

The next year, on November 21, 1999, a senior Israeli military official was quoted by AP reporter Ron Kampeas(who was later hired as Washington bureau chief for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency) saying, “Unless the United States pressures Russia to end its military assistance to Iran, the Islamic republic will possess a nuclear capability within five years.”

On December 9, 1999, General Zinni reiterated his assessment that Iran “will have nuclear capability in a few years.”

In a January 2000 New York Times article co-authored by Judith Miller, it was reported that the CIA suggested to the Clinton administration “that Iran might now be able to make a nuclear weapon,” even though this assessment was “apparently not based on evidence that Iran’s indigenous efforts to build a bomb have achieved a breakthrough,” but rather that “the United States cannot track with great certainty increased efforts by Iran to acquire nuclear materials and technology on the international black market.”

On March 9, 2000, the BBC stated that German intelligence once again believed Iran to be “working to develop missiles and nuclear weapons.”

The Telegraph reported on September 27, 2000 that the CIA believes Iran’s nuclear weapons capability to be progressing rapidly and suggests Iran will develop an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching London or New York within the next decade. CIA Deputy Director Norman Schindler is quoted as saying, “Iran is attempting to develop the capability to produce both plutonium and highly enriched uranium, and it is actively pursuing the acquisition of fissile material and the expertise and technology necessary to form the material into nuclear weapons.”

By the summer of 2001, Israeli Defense Minister Binyamin Ben-Eliezer was warning that Iran could have nuclear weapons by 2005 and that, sometime in the next decade, the Iranian nuclear program would reach a “point of no return,” from which time “it would be impossible to stop it from attaining a bomb.” By the end of the year, despite an inquiry into the questionable validity of Israeli intelligence regarding the Iranian nuclear program, Mossad head Efraim Halevy repeated the claim that Iran is developing nuclear and other non-conventional weapons.

In early 2002, the CIA again issued a report alleging that Iran “remains one of the most active countries seeking to acquire (weapons of mass destruction and advanced conventional weapons) technology from abroad…In doing so, Tehran is attempting to develop a domestic capability to produce various types of weapons — chemical, biological, nuclear — and their delivery systems.” Soon thereafter, CIA Director George Tenet testified before a Senate hearing that Iran may be able to “produce enough fissile material for a nuclear weapon by the end of this decade…Obtaining material from outside could cut years from this estimate.”

During his “Axis-of-Evil” State of the Union address on January 29, 2002, George W. Bush declared that Iran was “aggressively” pursuing weapons of mass destruction.

On July 29, 2002, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Marshall Billingslea testified to the Senate that “Iran is aggressively pursuing nuclear weapons.” Three days later, after a meeting with Russian officials on August 1, U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham stated that Iran was “aggressively pursuing nuclear weapons as well as [other] weapons of mass destruction.” By the end of the year, White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer was reiterating U.S. concerns about, what he termed, Iran’s “across-the-board pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and missile capabilities.”

In an interview with CNBC on February 2003, U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton said that Iran is seeking technological assistance from North Korea and China to enhance its weapons of mass destruction programs. In April 2003, John Wolf, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, accused Iran of having an “alarming, clandestine program.”

That same month, the Los Angeles Times stated that “there is evidence that Iran is developing nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction,” in a polling question regarding American attitudes toward Iran. The question followed, “Do you think the U.S. should or should not take military action against Iran if they continue to develop these weapons?” Fifty percent of respondents thought the U.S. should attack Iran.

The Telegraph reported on June 1, 2003 that “Senior Pentagon officials are proposing widespread covert operations against the government in Iran, hoping that dissident groups will mount a coup before the regime acquires a nuclear weapon.” The report contained a quote from a U.S. “government official with close links to the White House” as saying “There are some who see the overthrow of the regime as the only way to deal with the danger of Iran possessing a nuclear weapon. But there’s not going to be another war. The idea is to destabilize from inside. No one’s talking about invading anywhere.”

A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll taken in late June 2003 asked Americans, “How likely do you think it is that Iran is developing weapons of mass destruction?” 46% of those surveyed said “very likely,” while another 38% said “somewhat likely.” Only 2% replied “not at all likely.”

An August 5, 2003 report in the Jerusalem Post stated that “Iran will have the materials needed to make a nuclear bomb by 2004 and will have an operative nuclear weapons program by 2005, a high-ranking military officer told the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee.”

On October 21, 2003, Major General Aharon Ze’evi, Israel’s Director of Military Intelligence, declared in Ha’aretz that “by the summer of 2004, Iran will have reached the point of no return in its attempts to develop nuclear weapons.” A few weeks later, the CIA released a semi-annual unclassified report to Congress which stated Iran had “vigorously” pursued production of weapons of mass destruction and that the “United States remains convinced that Tehran has been pursuing a clandestine nuclear weapons program.”

By mid-November 2003, Mossad intelligence service chief Meir Dagan testified for the first time before the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and said that Iran was close to the “point of no return” in developing nuclear arms.

In early 2004, Ken Brill, U.S. Ambassador to the IAEA, reiterated the American position that Iran’s nuclear efforts are “clearly geared to the development of nuclear weapons.” One year later, on January 24, 2005, Mossad chief Meir Dagan again claimed that Iran’s nuclear program was almost at the “point of no return,” adding “the route to building a bomb is a short one” and that Iran could possess a nuclear weapon in less than three years. On January 28, the Guardian quoted Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz stating the same thing. He warned that Iran would reach “the point of no return” within the next twelve months in its covert attempt to secure a nuclear weapons capability. A week later, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said on CNN that Iran was “on a path of seeking a nuclear weapon,” but admitted that Iran was “years away” from building a nuclear bomb.

By August 2005, a “high-ranking IDF officer” told the Jerusalem Post that Israel has revised its earlier estimate that Iran would have a nuclear bomb by 2008, now putting the estimate closer to 2012. The same day, a major U.S. intelligence review projected that Iran was approximately ten years away from manufacturing the key ingredient for a nuclear weapon, doubling its previous estimate.

Two weeks later, however, Israeli military chief General Aharon Zeevi contradicted both the new Israeli and U.S. estimates. “Barring an unexpected delay,” he said, “Iran is going to become nuclear capable in 2008 and not in 10 years.”

In November 2005, Mohammad Mohaddessin, chair of the so-called National Council of Resistance of Iran(otherwise known as the Islamist/Marxist terrorist cult Mojahadeen-e Khalq, or MEK, which is currently designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. government) addressed a European Parliament conference and proclaimed that the “Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei is determined to pursue and complete Tehran’s nuclear weapons program full blast…[and] would have the bomb in two or three years time.”

On January 18, 2006, Donald Rumsfeld told Fox News that Iran was “acquiring nuclear weapons.”

A CNN/USA Today/Gallup survey conducted in late January 2006 asked, “Based on what you have heard or read, do you think that the government of Iran is or is not attempting to develop its own nuclear weapons?” 88% of those polled said Iran is.

82% of respondents to a Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll taken around the same time believed “Iran wants to use the uranium for military purposes, such as to build a nuclear weapons program.” 68% thought “Iran currently has a nuclear weapons program,” an increase of 8% from the previous year.

CBS News reported on April 26, 2007 that “a new intelligence report says Iran has overcome technical difficulties in enriching uranium and could have enough bomb-grade material for a single nuclear weapon in less than three years.”

In late May 2007, IAEA head Mohammad El Baradei stated that, even if Iran wanted to build a nuclear weapon (despite all evidence to the contrary), it would not be able to “before the end of this decade or some time in the middle of the next decade. In other words three to eight years from now.” On July 11, 2007, Ha’aretz reported that “Iran will cross the ‘technological threshold’ enabling it to independently manufacture nuclear weapons within six months to a year and attain nuclear capability as early as mid-2009, according to Israel’s Military Intelligence.” The report also noted that “U.S. intelligence predicts that Iran will attain nuclear capability within three to six years.”

A Fox News/Opinion Dynamics opinion poll taken in late September 2007 found that 80% of Americans believed Iran’s nuclear program was for “military purposes.”

Israeli President Shimon Peres issued an official statement on October 18, 2007 that claimed “everyone knows [Iran’s] true intentions, and many intelligence agencies throughout the world have proof that Iran is seeking to develop nuclear weapons for the purpose of war and death.”

Less than two months later, the New York Times released “Key Judgments From a National Intelligence Estimate on Iran’s Nuclear Activity,” a consensus view of all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies. The analysis, entitled “Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities,” concluded with “high confidence” that the Iranian government had “halted its nuclear weapons program” in 2003, “had not restarted its nuclear weapons program as of mid-2007,” and admitted that “we do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons.” The NIE also found that “Iran does not currently have a nuclear weapon” and that “Tehran’s decision to halt its nuclear weapons program suggests it is less determined to develop nuclear weapons than we have been judging since 2005.” Also included in the report was the assessment that, if Iran actually had a nuclear weapons program, “the earliest possible date Iran would be technically capable of producing enough HEU [highly enriched uranium] for a weapon is late 2009, but that this is very unlikely,” continuing, “Iran probably would be technically capable of producing enough HEU for a weapon sometime during the 2010-2015 time frame,” and adding that “All agencies recognize the possibility that this capability may not be attained until after 2015.”

report released on February 7, 2008 by the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) asserted that Iran had tested a new, and more efficient, centrifuge design to enrich uranium. If 1,200 new centrifuges were operational, the report suggested , Iran could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a bomb in one year.

Less than a week later, Israeli Prime Minster Ehud Olmert told reporters, “We are certain that the Iranians are engaged in a serious…clandestine operation to build up a non-conventional capacity.” Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, in a speech at West Point that Spring, claimed that Iran “is hellbent on acquiring nuclear weapons.”

On June 28, 2008, Shabtai Shavit, a former Mossad deputy director and influential adviser to the Israeli Knesset’s Defense and Foreign Affairs Committee, told The Sunday Telegraph that “worst-case scenario,” Iran may have a nuclear weapon in “somewhere around a year.”

In November 2008, David Sanger and William Broad of The New York Times reported that “Iran has now produced roughly enough nuclear material to make, with added purification, a single atom bomb, according to nuclear experts.” The article quoted nuclar physicist Richard L. Garwin, who helped invent the hydrogen bomb, as saying “They clearly have enough material for a bomb.” Siegfried S. Hecker of Stanford University and a former director of the Los Alamos weapons laboratory said in the report that the growing size of the Iranian stockpile “underscored that they are marching down the path to developing the nuclear weapons option,” while Thomas B. Cochran, a senior scientist in the nuclear program of the Natural Resources Defense Council declared, “They have a weapon’s worth.” Peter D. Zimmerman, a physicist and former United States government arms scientist, cautioned that Iran was “very close” to nuclear weapons capability. “If it isn’t tomorrow, it’s soon,” he said, indicating the threshold could be reached in a matter of months.

David Blair, writing in The Telegraph on January 27, 2009, reported that the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) “has said Iran is months away from crossing a vital threshold which could put it on course to build a weapon,” continuing that “Mark Fitzpatrick, the senior fellow for non-proliferation at the IISS, said: ‘This year, it’s very likely that Iran will have produced enough low-enriched uranium which, if further enriched, could constitute enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon, if that is the route Iran so desires.’”

On February 12, 2009, CIA Director-to-be Leon Panetta, told a Capitol Hill hearing, “From all the information I’ve seen, I think there is no question that [Iran is] seeking [nuclear weapons] capability.” Later that month, Benjamin Netanyahu, then a candidate for Israeli Prime Minister, told a Congressional delegation led by Maryland Senator Ben Cardin that “he did not know for certain how close Iran was to developing a nuclear weapons capability, but that ‘our experts’ say Iran was probably only one or two years away and that was why they wanted open ended negotiations.” Soon after that, Israel’s top intelligence official Amos Yadlin said Iran had “crossed the technological threshold” and was now capable of making a weapon.

In contrast to these allegations, National Intelligence director Dennis Blair told a Senate hearing in early March 2009 that Iran had only low-enriched uranium, which would need further processing to be used for weapons, and continued to explain that Iran had “not yet made that decision” to convert it. “We assess now that Iran does not have any highly enriched uranium,” Blair said.

Speaking in private with U.S. Congressmembers in late Spring 2009, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak “estimated a window between 6 and 18 months from now in which stopping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons might still be viable.” In mid-June 2009, Mossad chief Meir Dagan said, “the Iranians will have by 2014 a bomb ready to be used, which would represent a concrete threat for Israel.”

On July 8, 2009, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, speaking at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, warned that the “window is closing” for preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. Mullen claimed that Iran was only one to three years away from successfully building a nuclear weapon and “is very focused on developing this capability.” A week later, Germany’s BND foreign intelligence agency declared Iran was capable of producing and testing an atomic bomb within six months.

The following month, on August 3, The Times (UK) reported that Iran had “perfected the technology to create and detonate a nuclear warhead” and “could feasibly make a bomb within a year” if given the order by head of state Ali Khamenei.

Meanwhile, a Newsweek report from September 16, 2009, indicated that the National Intelligence Estimate stood by its 2007 assessment and that “U.S. intelligence agencies have informed policymakers at the White House and other agencies that the status of Iranian work on development and production of a nuclear bomb has not changed.” Nevertheless, both ABC News/Washington Post and CNN/Opinion Research Corporation polls taken in mid-October 2009 found that, “Based on what [they]‘ve heard or read,” between 87% and 88% of respondents believed Iran to be developing nuclear weapons.

In November 2009, during a private meeting between U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs, Alexander Vershbow, and a number of senior Israeli defense officials in Israel, the head of Israel’s Defense Ministry Intelligence Analysis Production, Brigadier General Yossi Baidatz, “argued that it would take Iran one year to obtain a nuclear weapon and two and a half years to build an arsenal of three weapons.”

The Times (UK) reported on January 10, 2010 that retired Israeli brigadier-general and former director-general of Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission Uzi Eilam “believes it will probably take Iran seven years to make nuclear weapons,” despite the dire warnings from Major-General Amos Yadlin, head of Israeli military intelligence, who had recently told the Knesset defense committee that Iran would most likely be able to build a single nuclear device within the year.

In an interview with the U.S. military’s Voice of America on January 12, 2010, the director of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess, said there was no evidence that Iran has made a final decision to build nuclear weapons and confirmed that the key NIE finding that Iran has not yet committed itself to nuclear weapons was still valid. “The bottom line assessments of the NIE still hold true,” he said. “We have not seen indication that the government has made the decision to move ahead with the program.”

Barack Obama, in his first State of the Union speech on January 27, 2010 claimed that Iran was “violating international agreements in pursuit of nuclear weapons.”

Speaking in Doha, Qatar on February 14, 2010, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addressed, what she called, “Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons.” Although Clinton said that the United States was attempting to “influence the Iranian decision regarding whether or not to pursue a nuclear weapon,” she added that “the evidence is accumulating that that’s exactly what they are trying to do, which is deeply concerning, because it doesn’t directly threaten the United States, but it directly threatens a lot of our friends, allies, and partners here in this region and beyond.”

A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, taken at the same time as Clinton’s Doha visit, revealed that 71% of Americans believed Iran already had nuclear weapons. Of those remaining respondents who didn’t think Iran already possessed a nuclear bomb, over 72% thought it either “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that “Iran will have nuclear weapons in the next few years.”

At an April 14, 2010 hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Lieutenant General Burgess, stated that Iran could develop a nuclear weapon within a year and in three years build one that could be deployed, despite having judged that Iran didn’t even have an active nuclear weapons program a mere four months earlier.

Perennial warmongers David Sanger and William Broad of the New York Times reported on May 31, 2010 that “Iran has now produced a stockpile of nuclear fuel that experts say would be enough, with further enrichment, to make two nuclear weapons.”

On June 11, 2010, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that “Most people believe that the Iranians could not really have any nuclear weapons for at least another year or two. I would say the intelligence estimates range from one to three years.”

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill on June 24, 2010, introduced by Democratic Congressman Jim Costa of California, that “condemn[ed] the Government of Iran’s continued pursuit of a nuclear weapons capability and unconventional weapons and ballistic missile capabilities.”

CIA Director Leon Panetta said on June 27, 2010, Iran would need two years to prepare two tested and operational nuclear weapons. “We think they have enough low-enriched uranium for two weapons,” Panetta told Jake Tapper ofABC News, continuing to explain that Iran would require one year to enrich the material to weapon-grade levels and “another year to develop the kind of weapon delivery system in order to make that viable.”

On July 22, 2010, nearly a third of House Republicans signed onto a resolution which stated that “Iran continues its pursuit of nuclear weapons” and “express[ed] support for the State of Israel’s right to defend Israeli sovereignty, to protect the lives and safety of the Israeli people, and to use all means necessary to confront and eliminate nuclear threats posed by the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the use of military force if no other peaceful solution can be found within reasonable time to protect against such an immediate and existential threat to the State of Israel.”

On August 19, 2010, the New York Times quoted Gary Samore, President Obama’s top adviser on nuclear issues, as saying that the U.S. believes Iran has “roughly a year dash time” before it could convert nuclear material into a working weapon.

Following the release of the latest IAEA report on Iran’s nuclear facilities, The Telegraph declared that Iran was “on [the] brink of [a] nuclear weapon,” had “passed a crucial nuclear threshold,” and “could now go on to arm an atomic missile with relative ease.”

In his attention-grabbing September 2009 cover story for The Atlantic, entitled “The Point of No Return,” Israeli establishment mouthpiece Jeffrey Goldberg wrote that, according to Israeli intelligence estimates, “Iran is, at most, one to three years away from having a breakout nuclear capability (often understood to be the capacity to assemble more than one missile-ready nuclear device within about three months of deciding to do so).”

Joint Chiefs chairman Mullen, speaking in Bahrain on December 18, 2010, said, “From my perspective I see Iran continuing on this path to develop nuclear weapons, and I believe that that development and achieving that goal would be very destabilizing to the region.”

A week ago, on December 22, 2010, the great prognosticator Sarah Palin wrote in USA Today that “Iran continues to defy the international community in its drive to acquire nuclear weapons.”

Two days ago, December 29, 2010, Reuters quoted Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Moshe Yaalon as claiming Iran would soon have a nuclear weapon. “I don’t know if it will happen in 2011 or in 2012, but we are talking in terms of the next three years,” he said, adding that in terms of Iran’s nuclear time-line, “we cannot talk about a ‘point of no return.’ Iran does not currently have the ability to make a nuclear bomb on its own.”

And Just hours after this article was originally posted on December 29, United Press International published the findings of a new public opinion poll conducted by Angus-Reid. The poll found that 70% of respondents believe “the Government of Iran is attempting to develop nuclear weapons. Only 11 per cent of Americans do not believe that Iran is pursuing a nuclear program, while one-in-five (19%) are not sure.”

Despite all of these hysterical warnings, no evidence of an Iranian nuclear weapons program has ever been revealed. The IAEA has repeatedly found, through intensive, round-the-clock monitoring and inspection of Iran’s nuclear facilities – including numerous surprise visits to Iranian enrichment plants – that all of Iran’s centrifuges operate under IAEA safeguards and “continue to be operated as declared.”

As far back as 1991, then-Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Hans Blix, made it clear that there was “no cause for concern” regarding Iran’s attempts to acquire nuclear technology. Twelve years later, in an IAEA report from November 2003, the agency affirmed that “to date, there is no evidence that the previously undeclared nuclear material and activities referred to above were related to a nuclear weapons programme.” Furthermore, after extensive inspections of Iran’s nuclear facilities, the IAEA again concluded in its November 2004 report that “all the declared nuclear material in Iran has been accounted for, and therefore such material is not diverted to prohibited activities.”

During a press conference in Washington D.C. on October 27, 2007, IAEA Director-General El Baradei confirmed, “I have not received any information that there is a concrete active nuclear weapons program going on right now.” He continued, “Have we seen Iran having the nuclear material that can readily be used into a weapon? No. Have we seen an active weapons program? No.”

By May 2008, the IAEA still reported that it had found “no indication” that Iran has or ever did have a nuclear weapons program and affirmed that “The Agency has been able to continue to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material [to weaponization] in Iran.” On February 22, 2009, IAEA spokesperson Melissa Fleming even issued a statement clarifying the IAEA’s position regarding the flurry of deliberately misleading articles in the US and European press claiming that Iran had enriched enough uranium “to build a nuclear bomb.” The statement, among other things, declared that “No nuclear material could have been removed from the [Nantanz] facility without the Agency’s knowledge since the facility is subject to video surveillance and the nuclear material has been kept under seal.”

This assessment was reaffirmed in September 2009, in response to various media reports over the past few years claiming that Iran’s intent to build a nuclear bomb can be proven by information provided from a mysterious stolenlaptop and a dubious, undated – and forged – two-page document. The IAEA stated, “With respect to a recent media report, the IAEA reiterates that it has no concrete proof that there is or has been a nuclear weapon programme in Iran.”

In his Annual Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, delivered on February 2, 2010, National Intelligence director Dennis Blair stated, “We continue to assess [that] Iran is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons in part by developing various nuclear capabilities that bring it closer to being able to produce such weapons, should it choose to do so. We do not know, however, if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons.”

In a Spring 2010 Unclassified Report to Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Related to Weapons of Mass Destruction, Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis Peter Lavoy affirmed that “we do not know whether Iran will eventually decide to produce nuclear weapons.”

Speaking with Charlie Rose in November 2010, Blair once again reiterated that “Iran hasn’t made up its mind” whether or not to pursue nuclear weaponry. On November 28, 2010, a diplomatic cable made available by Wikileaksrevealed that, in December 2009, senior Israeli Defense Ministry official Amos Gilad told Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher that “he was not sure Tehran had decided it wants a nuclear weapon.”

Back in October 2003, the San Francisco Chronicle quoted former IAEA weapons inspector David Albright as saying, with regard to new reports about a possible Iranian nuclear weapons program revealed by the MEK, “We should be very suspicious about what our leaders or the exile groups say about Iran’s nuclear capacity.”

Albright continued, “There is a drumbeat of allegations, but there’s not a whole lot of solid information. It may be that Iran has not made the decision to build nuclear weapons. We have to be very careful not to overstate the intelligence.”

It appears that nothing much has changed in the past seven years, let alone the previous three decades.

Whereas the new year will surely bring more lies and deception about Iran and its nuclear energy program, more doublespeak and duplicity regarding the threat Iran poses to the United States, to Israel and to U.S.-backed Arab dictatorships, and more warmongering and demonization from Zionist think tanks, right-wing and progressive pundits alike, the 112th Congress and the Obama administration, the truth is not on their side.

“Facts are stubborn things,” John Adams said in 1770. “And whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”

Here’s hoping that, in 2011, the facts will begin to matter.

Happy New Year.

A version of this post originally appeared on Nima Shirazi’s blog Wide Asleep in America.

Posted in WorldComments Off on IRANIAN NUKES-THE PHANTOM MENACE

Shoah’s pages

www.shoah.org.uk

KEEP SHOAH UP AND RUNNING

January 2011
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31