Archive | June 11th, 2011

letter from Marseille



The most recent mental image I had of Marseille was during the French strikes in autumn, as dozens of finger-thin silver frigates long ago put out at sea hovered in the Mediterranean while the Marseillais dock-workers refused to offload them. Last time I was there, I did not notice so much the mounting North African presence, in the news constantly as politicians inveigh against Arab immigrants from the Maghreb and the question of what to “do” about the children of poor immigrants immiserated in Paris’s banliues, and Muslim women insisting that they have the right to dress as they wish, be it with niqab or hijab, against the oppressively universalist secularism of French society.

This time I saw the North African presence everywhere: the skin tone of the people on the streets, the streets lined with halal butcher shops and Moroccan couscous restaurants, and the signs and posters calling for maseerat – Arabic for demonstrations – alongside identical signs in French. Signs of support for the Spanish demonstrations were on the walls too. Men and women who have been in France for 20 or 30 years shift seamlessly back-and-forth between Arabic and French, sometimes speaking in a mélange of the two. Poverty correlating with color, as it does in wealthy Western countries, the street kids are all conspicuously of the ancestry of one or another of the former French colonies: Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia, as they play cat-and-mouse games with the police pacing around the port.

There are a lot of police. Perhaps it’s the threat of terrorism: they are also French military walking along with the police. The military are bedecked in camouflage fatigues and carry assault rifles on city streets, doing their duty of keeping people scared, if not necessarily safe.

But what struck me most were the bookstores. Never mind that one-sixth of each shop was devoted to philosophy, or that Lewis Mumford’s unavailable-in-English The City in History is circulating in a beautiful French translation. I had asked my friend upon arrival if he could locate a good left-wing bookstore, but in Marseille, the good bookstores are all leftist: no wandering off to a communist book-seller in some nook of the city to find out what leftist French people are reading and writing: Yves Lacoste on post-colonialism, Alberto Toscano on fanaticism, and dozens of pamphlet-sized books by Eric Hazan, Alain Gresh, or Rashid Khalidi. Pierre Clastres’s Society against the State is, surreally, available in bookstores here, and a relatively-unknown – outside of the academy – Timothy Mitchell essay on carbon democracy was actually put out as a book here.

The issue of post-colonialism can never be far from the surface, and nowhere more than when the far shores of the Mediterranean are practically within eyeshot, vast white ferries slide into their berths in Marseille’s port, and the news is full of French politicians debating whether there should be full amnesty for the millions of illegal immigrants from North Africa filling the schools and altering the future of France’s demography – and others suggest that they should go “back where they came from,” as the heritage of French empire is relentlessly scrubbed out of the contemporary imaginary and its control over the past, a nauseating juxtaposition when the French armed forces are once again running amok in Cote D’Ivoire and “liberating” Libya. Colonialism is not over until it’s over.

Posted in PoliticsComments Off on letter from Marseille

America’s Next War Theater: Syria and Lebanon? Washington’s War against the Resistance Bloc


By Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya

Global Research,

Washington and its allies, Israel and the Al-Sauds, are taking advantage of the upheavals in the Arab World. They are now working to dismantle the Resistance Bloc and weaken any drive for democracy in the Arab World. The geo-political chessboard is now being prepared for a broader confrontation that will target Tehran and include Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and the Palestinians.

Tying Hezbollah’s Hands through External and Internal Pressure

In Lebanon, there is a deadlock in regards to the formation of a Lebanese government. Michel Sleiman, who holds the presidency and the new Lebanese prime minister have been delaying the formation of the cabinet in a political row with Michel Aoun, the leader of the Free Patriotic Movement.

It may be possible that the formation of a new Lebanese cabinet is being delayed deliberately to keep Lebanon neutralized on the foreign policy front.

The U.N. Security Council and several U.N. bodies are all being used by the U.S. and the E.U. to put pressure on Lebanon. U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is taking his orders fom Washington. He has contributed to providiing legitimacy to U.S. NATO led wars. Moscow has openly accused Ban Ki Moon of treachery for his 2008 secret dealings with NATO.

It is in this context that the U.N. is being used as a forum for insidious attempts to internationalize the issue of weapons held by the Lebanese Resistance, with a view to disarming it. Despite the fact that U.N. Resolution 1559 is no longer relevant, the Special Representative for the Implementation of Resolution 1559, Terje Roed-Larsen, still remains active and issues reports against Hezbollah.

The envoys of the U.N. to Lebanon resemble colonial figures making uninvited edicts in Beirut and working as agents of Washington, Brussels, and Tel Aviv. The Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), which has an entire division in the U.S. State Department, is also a loaded political weapon that Washington is planniong on using against Lebanon and Syria.

An international tribunal was formed pertaining to the circumnstances of the the assassination of Rafic Al-Hariri. Hariri at the time of his murder had no official state position, but an international tribunal has been created for his case alone. On the other hand the international community has taken no interest in forming any type of tribunals to investigate the assassination of thousands of people killed in Lebanon. What does this say about the STL and the justice being sought?

The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has also been complicit in Israeli violations against Lebanon. Even the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East (UNRAW) has been infiltrated with officials that are supportive of Israeli crimes against Palestinians and Lebanese. This was demonstrated by Christopher Gunness, the spokesperson of UNRAW, in a May 15, 2011 interview with the Israeli military. While Israel’s IDF was firing on unarmed civilian protesters during Nakba Day 2011, Gunness reaffirmed that UNRAW was working in the interest of Israel’s national security, while also accusing the Palestinians of committing terrorist acts against Israel. Even the Israeli siege of the Gaza Strip was whitewashed by the UNRAW spokesperson.

The absence of a new cabinet in Lebanon has also allowed Saad Hariri and the March 14 Alliance to continue having an ominous hand in managing Lebanon’s affairs. This also buys time for the STL, which can move forward without being challenged by a Lebanese government in Beirut that would be hostile to the ISF.  In this regard, a new government in Beirut would most certainly question to legitmacy of the STL.

Moreover, the Internal Security Forces (ISF) of Lebanon is also being used by the Saad Hariri government against Hezbollah and the political opponents of Hariri family. The ISF may even have a hand in working against Damascus and helping promote violence in Syria. The ISF takes its orders directly from the Hariri family. The latter also controls the Lebanese government.

Because of the free hand given to Saad Hariri and his cronies (largely due to the absence of a functioning cabinet in Beirut), Ziad Baroud, the acting interior minister of Lebanon, has refused to sign any more papers from his ministry. Baroud has taken this position, because he believes that the ISF is acting covertly and without his approval or supervision. In this regard, the ISF has refused to follow the orders of Ziad Baroud to allow Charbel Al-Nahhas, the acting telecommunications minister of Lebanon, to enter ISF headquarters for a routine check. The ISF was clearly trying to hide its operations and was acting to prevent Al-Nahhas and his team from going to certain floors at ISF headquarters.

It is also no secret that Lebanon is a nest of intelligence agents and operatives from the U.S., the E.U., Israel, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia. Their objective is to confront and dismantle Hezbollah and its coalition.

In 2006, during the Israeli bombardment of Lebanon the embassies of E.U. members were also collecting data against Hezbollah. The Al-Sauds have helped facilitate the links between Israel and the network of spies in Lebanon. This is demonstrated by the clear link between Sheikh Mohammed Ali Hussein, the Shiite cleric working caught working for Israel, and the Al-Sauds.

In tune with all this, Hezbollah is constantly accused of being an instrument of Iran. Recently, Hezbollah was blamed alongside Iran for stirring protests in the Persian Gulf, specifically in Bahrain and the Shiite-dominated areas of Saudi Arabia. In this regard Lebanese citizens, regardless of their faith in many cases, have also been singled out by the Khaliji regimes and expelled from the Persian Gulf. This is part of a sectarian card to create regional divisions and hate. Within Lebanon it has been used by the Saad Hariri faction to target Hezbollah and its allies. Hariri has ironically accused Iran of interfering in Bahrain at the very moment the Saudi military invaded the island-state to keep the Al-Khalifas in power.

The petro-sheikhdoms of the Persian Gulf are now systematically preventing Lebanese, Syrian, Iraqi, Iranian, and Pakistani citizens from entering their borders. Kuwait has justified this by saying that there could be trouble within Kuwait due to political instability in these countries.

Destabilizing Syria

Damascus has been under pressure to capitulate to the edicts of Washington and the European Union. This has been part of a longstanding project. Regime change or voluntary subordination by the Syrian regime are the goals. This includes subordinating Syrian foreign policy and de-linking Syrian from its strategic alliance with Iran and its membership within the Resistance Bloc.

Syria is run by an authoritarian oligarchy which has used brute force in dealing with its citizens. The riots in Syria, however, are complex. They cannot be viewed as a straighforward quest for liberty and democracy. There has been an attempt by the U.S. and the E.U. to use the riots in Syria to pressure and intimidate the Syrian leadership. Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, and the March 14 Alliance have all played a role in supporting an armed insurrection.

The Al-Sauds have also helped drown out any authentic calls for democratic reform and marginalized the democratic elements in the Syrian opposition during the protests and riots. In this regard the Al-Sauds have supported both sectarian factions as well as terrorist elements, which quesiton the foundations of religious tolerance in Syria. These elements are mostly Salafist extremists, like Fatah Al-Islam and the new extremist political movements being organized in Egypt. They have also been rallying against the Alawites, the Druze, and Syrian Christians.

The violence in Syria has been supported from the outside with a view of taking advantage of the internal tensions and the anger in Syria. Aside from the violent reaction of the Syrian Army, media lies have been used and bogus footage has been aired. Money and weapons have also been funnelled to elements of the Syrian opposition by the U.S., the E.U., the March 14 Alliance, Jordan, and the Khalijis. Funding has also been provided to ominous and unpopular foreign-based Syrian opposition figures, while weapons caches were smuggled from Jordan and Lebanon into Syria.

The events in Syria are also tied to Iran, the longstanding strategic ally of Damascus. It is not by chance that Senator Lieberman was demanding publicly that the Obama Administration and NATO attack Syria and Iran like Libya. It is also not coincidental that Iran was included in the sanctions against Syria. The hands of the Syrian military and government have now been tied internally as a new and broader offensive is being prepared that will target both Syria and Iran.

Syria and the Levantine Gas Fields in the Eastern Mediterranean

Syria is the central piece of two important energy corridors. The first links Turkey and the Caspian to Israel and the Red Sea and the second links Iraq to the Mediterranean. The surrender of Syria would mean that Washington and its allies would control these energy routes. It would also mean that the large natural gas fields off the Lebanese and Syrian coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean would be out of reach for China and would instead go to the E.U., Israel, and the U.S.

The Eastern Mediterranean gas fields have been the subject of negotiations between the E.U., Turkey, Iran, Syria, and Lebanon. Aside from the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Pipeline, the existence of the Levantine natural gas fields is also the reason why the Kremlin has created a military foothold in Syria for the Russian Federation. This has been done by upgrading Soviet-era naval facilities in Syria. Moreover, it has been Iran that has agreed to explore and help develop these natural gas fields off the Levantine coast for Beirut and Damascus.

Hamas-Fatah Rapprochement

There is a strong correlation between war in Southwest Asia and increased talk at the official level about Palestinian statehood. Hopes of Palestinian statehood have always been used twice to discharge pressure in the Arab World built from rising tensions from war preparations against Iraq. The first time was by George H.W. Bush Sr. and the second time by George W. Bush Jr., who was praised for being the first U.S. president to seriously talk about a Palestinian state.

Even as he flip-flops on his position, Obama is also now talking about a Palestinian state. Moreover, rapprochement between Hamas and Fatah has taken place as the count-down towards international recognition of Palestinian statehood begins. The Israelis have also released frozen funds to the Palestinians, which they refused to do before due to Hamas.

The rapprochement between Fatah and Hamas has also served to tie the hands of Hamas. Hamas will have to be careful not to effectively become a junior partner in governing Palestine under Israeli occupation. Hamas must effectively now modify its stance in its partnership in a unity government with Fatah. In all likelihood Tel Aviv and Washington will seek to impose Fatah as the senior partner of the Palestinian Authority. In a manner of speaking, Hamas is being domesticated indirectly by Israel and Washington.

Instability in Pakistan

The announcement that Osama bin Laden has been killed by U.S. forces has contributed to a process of covert political destabilization within Pakistan. There has been a calculated effort to present Osama bin Laden as a popular and venerated figure for Muslims. This is with a view of supporting the so-called “Clash of Civilizations.”

At the same time the U.S. government is starting a media campaign against Pakistan. Islamabad has been portrayed as harbouring Osama bin Laden and his Al-Qaeda network. In reality any Pakistani involvement with terrorists has been ordered and directed by Washington. There is a much more complicated story to all this, but what is happening in reality is that Pakistan as a nation is being targeted for dismantlement.

The dismantlement and destabilization of Pakistan would serve three objectives.

1. Promoting a scenario of a war with Iran: Pakistan would not be under threat of a takeover by revolutionaries that would side with Iran and its allies.

2. The targetting of Chinese interests in Pakistan, including the energy corridor from Iran to China (the Chinese port in Gwadar), which transits through Pakistan.

3. Regional destabilization in a key area of Eurasia where Southwest Asia, Central Asia and the Indian sub-continent meet. This area extends from Iran and Afghanistan to Pakistan, India, and Western China. At the same time Washington also wants to neutralize the Pakistani nuclear program.

The U.S. has also announced that it has the right to violate the national boundaries of countries which harbour terrorists as well as send troops to these countries as part of the “war on terrorism.”  Hillary Clinton has justified Washington stance by saying that U.S. forces would be assassinating terrorists. This is merely an opening door for creating a pretext for military intervention in countries such as Iran or Syria.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.

Posted in Middle EastComments Off on America’s Next War Theater: Syria and Lebanon? Washington’s War against the Resistance Bloc

Mondoweiss Online Newsletter


June 5 protest showed that Netanyahu lied to Congress when he bragged on freedom of worship

Jun 10, 2011

Alex Kane

When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke to a joint session of Congress last month, he proclaimed proudly that “only a democratic Israel has protected freedom of worship for all faiths in the city.”

This is a lie, as a key youth organizer based in Ramallah recently told me in a phone interview. A few days before he returned back to Palestine after a trip to the United States, Fadi Quran said that Israeli restrictions on Palestinian travel to Jerusalem would be plain to see on the June 5 protest commemorating the Naksa. Quran is an organizer with the March 15 youth movement, which first demonstrated in favor of Palestinian reconciliation.

He was right.

Hundreds of Palestinian protesters who marched on the Israeli Defense Forces’ Qalandia checkpoint that separates Jerusalem from Ramallah were met with tear-gas and rubber bullets. Dozens of injuries were reported. The demonstrators, as shown in this YouTube video circulated on the internet, demanded that they be allowed free access to Jerusalem. Israel strictly controls Palestinian access to Jerusalem.

Quran told me:

On June 5, we’re going to ask the world the question, ‘Why are five million Palestinians prevented from getting to Jerusalem?’ And if they are prevented, then didn’t Netanyahu just lie to the American Congress, and if so, why did they stand up and clap for him when he said that lie? We’re going to make these types of lies, and this type of false rhetoric, obvious. And the question then will be, are the people who believe in justice going to stand up on the side of those fighting for their rights, or are they going to stay on the side of those who are unfair and unjust and survive by stripping people of their dignity?

Alex Kane, a freelance journalist and blogger based in New York City, writes on Israel/Palestine and Islamophobia, where this post originally appeared.  Follow him on Twitter @alexbkane.

Obama hides meeting with top Bahraini leader—and mutes criticism of crackdown

Jun 10, 2011


and other news from the Arab uprisings:

Bahrain Shiite cleric: No talks under clampdown (AP)
AP – Bahrain’s most senior Shiite cleric says there is no chance for talks with the Gulf nation’s Sunni rulers while security forces maintain their clampdowns on protesters demanding equal rights and political freedoms.*

Obama Hides Meeting with Top Bahraini Leader—And Mutes Criticism of Ongoing Crackdown
Amidst an intensifying crackdown on anti-government protesters in the tiny Gulf island kingdom of Bahrain, President Obama met Tuesday with Crown Prince Salman bin Isa al-Khalifa, a visit that was not announced beforehand. We speak with Nabeel Rajab, president of Bahrain’s Center for Human Rights, based in Manama. “On the ground, we don’t see anything, any signal, that makes us optimistic that the government has the willingness to go for a dialogue with the opposition and to listen to the grievances and the demands of the people,” says Rajab, noting that soldiers from Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Bahrain continue to arrest protesters and the doctors treating those injured during pro-democracy demonstrations. [includes rush transcript]
link to

Bahrain bans human rights seminar
Bahrain’s leading opposition party says the government has imposed a ban on a seminar detailing abuses committed by the ruling regime during its brutal crackdown of anti-regime protests.
link to

Opposition: 400 Bahrainis on trial after protests (Reuters)
Reuters – About 400 people have been put on trial in Bahrain for their roles in weeks of protests that rocked the Gulf island kingdom this year, a leading opposition group said on Thursday, but the government disputed the figure.*

Bahrain’s unseen protests fall on deaf ears (Reuters)
Reuters – In a poor district of Bahrain’s capital, a few hundred people marched through cramped, crumbling alleyways banging pans and screaming, “Down with the regime.”*

Bahrain bans human rights seminar
Bahrain’s leading opposition party says the government has imposed a ban on a seminar detailing abuses committed by the ruling regime during its brutal crackdown of anti-regime protests. “Authorities have banned a presentation on ‘the atrocities of human rights violations since February 14’,” the Islamic National Accord Association (al-Wefaq) announced on Wednesday.
link to

Regular flights to Baghdad resume
Austrian Airlines has resumed flights to Baghdad after 21 years, becoming the first major Western carrier offering a regular service to the Iraqi capital. The Austrian Airlines plane touched down yesterday afternoon at Baghdad International Airport.
link to

Bahrain to resume Lebanon flights
Bahraini carrier Gulf Air has announced its flights to Lebanon will be resumed on June 12, following its suspension in late March, Deutsche Press Agenture has reported.
link to

The U.S. and Bahrain: How to Talk Just Tough Enough with an Ally ( – After some blunt language in May, the President and the Secretary of State issue more conciliatory words to Bahrain’s visiting Crown Prince. Will that help ease the repression?*

Ghazi Farhan
TO APPRECIATE how all-encompassing the dragnet sweeping Bahrain to quash the island’s Arab awakening has been, consider Ghazi Farhan. A dapper 31-year-old property executive, Mr Farhan manages three restaurants and a set of stables. Amid his pictures on Facebook is one of him at a tea party with Prince Charles.
link to

Mussa wants peace with Israel but not at any price (AFP)
AFP – The Arab League’s outgoing chief and Egyptian presidential candidate Amr Mussa told French television on Thursday that he wants to work for peace between Israel and Palestinians but not at any price.*

Egypt denies resuming gas supply to Israel
The Egyptian oil ministry has denied media rumors that Egypt resumed Tuesday pumping gas to Israel.

Egypt: A new constitution first?
A group of Egyptian NGOs, echoing calls from various political parties and youth groups, have issued a statement backing the Tunisian model of transition, namely that a new constitution should be drafted before parliamentary and presidential elections take place. This is a position that is gaining traction among a lot of people, reflecting in part a lack of trust in the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces and in part the fear of Islamist-dominated parliament in the next elections.
link to

Egypt’s unfinished revolution
Hundreds of families were evicted from their homes in Egypt, in January. Promised to be moved into government housing quickly, these Egyptians still live in tents. If the revolution was about reclaiming Egyptian dignity — then what happens to these homeless citizens remains its unfinished business. Al Jazeera’s Sherine Tadros reports from Cairo.
link to

Tahrir Square documents: for Zionists to freak out some more
Raed sent me this:  “Thought you might be interested in this archive of documents from the revolutionaries in Egypt. My favorite of course is the one that states that “the liberation of Cairo is not complete without the liberation of Jerusalem”. Wonder if Friedman or Ajami will ever understand…”
link to

Samir Amin, “Middle Classes, American-style ‘Democracy,’ and the Muslim Brotherhood”
The middle classes as a whole rally around only the democratic objective, without necessarily objecting to the “market” (such as it is) or to Egypt’s international alignment wholesale. Not to be neglected is the role of a group of bloggers who take part, consciously or not, in a veritable conspiracy organized by the CIA. Its animators are usually young people from the wealthy classes, extremely Americanized, who nevertheless present themselves as “opponents” of the established dictatorships. The theme of democracy, in the version required for its manipulation by Washington, is uppermost in their discourse on the “Net.”
link to

How Do You Finance Social Justice in Egypt? Jadaliyya Interview With Journalist Wael Gamal
This is our third in a series of interviews we conducted in Cairo during our recent trip. We had the fortune to meet with a friend and prominent journalist, Wael Gamal, whose column in al-Shurouq’s economy section is closely followed in Egypt and beyond–and is also published here on Jadaliyya (see video below). We discussed the overarching question of “social justice” after the revolution. In particular, how do you finance social justice in a country like Egypt?
link to

Jordan Tries to Remake Its Political Machinery
Whether Parliament approves recommendations from a National Dialogue Committee on reforming politics is an open question.
link to

Gaddafi no longer in charge of anything in Libya except army – Libyan rebel deputy leader
Dubai, Asharq Al-Awsat – Deputy leader of the Libyan rebel National Transitional Council [NTC], Abdul Hafiz Ghoga, stressed that Gaddafi is no longer in charge of anything inside Libya, except for the army, which he is using to crush the Libyan people. Ghoga claimed that Gaddafi was no longer even in control of the capital Tripoli, and stressed that the NTC forces are approximately 70 km from Tripoli, and gaining ground every day.
link to

Gaddafi A Legitimate Target, Says NATO Official
(CNN) — A U.N. resolution justifies the targeting of Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, a senior NATO military official with operational knowledge of the Libya mission told CNN Thursday.
link to

Fresh NATO airstrikes rock Tripoli
Fresh airstrikes hit Tripoli late on Wednesday as NATO continue to pound targets in the Libyan capital.

$1.1 Billion in Aid Pledged to Libyan Rebels
The nations intervening in Libya promised the funds as senior officials continued to predict that the collapse of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi’s government could be imminent.
link to

Libya fears boom over land mines
There is growing concern in Libya about munitions left behind by military factions following months of conflict between Gaddafi’s forces and rebels. Safety teams inspecting the aftermath of battle zones have found an alarming number of unexploded rockets and mines around the eastern city of Ajdabiya and are trying to dispose all of them. Sue Turton reports from Ajdabiya.
link to

Libya rebel council may include extremists, Panetta says
CIA Director Leon Panetta told lawmakers that worries about some members of the Libyan rebels’ ruling body are ‘legitimate.’ President Obama’s nominee for secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, told the Senate that he is concerned that some leaders of Libya’s opposition may be extremists, even as officials disclosed that U.S. aid for those fighting Moammar Kadafi will fall far short of what the rebel group says it needs.
link to

Visual diary shows Libyan soldier at war
Al Jazeera has obtained exclusive pictures taken by a young Libyan soldier before he died in battle. The images give a telling insight into the reality of the war in Libya from the perspective of the government troops. Tony Birtley reports.
link to

Qaddafi ordered sex drugs for Libya rapes, ICC prosecutor says
Investigators have evidence that Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi ordered mass rapes and bought containers of sex drugs to encourage troops to attack women, the chief ICC prosecutor said. Luis Moreno-Ocampo said he may ask for a new charge of mass rape to be made against the Libyan strongman.
link to

Opposition forces edge towards Tripoli
Gaddaffi forces are advancing towards the opposition-held city of Misrata. But rebel fighters are continuing their campaign on several fronts, their progress has been slow but steady as they continue to take ground from Gaddafi forces. Al Jazeera’s James Bays reports from Yafran in the western mountain region of Libya.
link to

We’ll turn our guns on Libyan rebels if they attack civilians, Nato threatens
UK and Nato forces would be prepared to turn their guns on their present allies, Libya’s rebels, if they attacked civilians loyal to Muammar Gaddafi’s regime, British officials stated yesterday.
link to

Women in the Crossfire
Iman Obeidi became famous in March when she burst into the Rixos Hotel in Tripoli and accused Libyan forces of raping her. She was quickly taken by authorities, but eventually found her way to Qatar to seek refugee status in the West.
link to

Saudi Arabia
In Saudi Arabia, Royal Funds Buy Peace for Now
This oil-rich kingdom is spending $130 billion to pump up salaries, build housing and finance religious organizations, effectively neutralizing any opposition.
link to

Saudi fear of revolutions
“Little did Riyadh know that the most severe strategic blow to its regional influence would come not from Tehran, or Tehran’s agents in Baghdad – but Cairo, its closest Arab friend. The ousting of Mubarak did not only mean the loss of a strong ally, but the collapse of the old balance of power. The region could no longer be divided on a Riyadh-Cairo v Tehran-Damascus axis. Revolutions have struck in both camps: in “moderate” Egypt and Tunisia, as in “hardline” Damascus and Tripoli. The principal challenge for the Saudi regime is no longer the influence of Syria, Iran or Hezbollah, but the contagion of revolutions.”
link to

This Saudi propagandist is bragging about Saudi military strength
A bunch of Hawthi rebels with primitive weapons chased Saudi elite forces who can still be seen on Youtube running for their lives:  “The foundation for this more robust strategic posture is Saudi Arabia’s investment of around $150 billion in its military. This includes a potential expansion of the National Guard and Armed Forces by at least 120,000 troops, and a further 60,000 troops for the security services at the Interior Ministry, notably in the special and various police forces. A portion of these will join units that could be deployed beyond the Kingdom’s borders.  In addition, approximately 1,000 new state-of-the-art combat tanks may be added to the Army, and the Air Force will see its capabilities significantly improve with the doubling of its high quality combat airplanes to about 500 advanced aircraft.  A massive new missile defense system is in the works. Finally, the two main fleets of the Navy will undergo extensive expansion and a complete refurbishment of existing assets.  As part of this new defense doctrine, the leadership has decided to meet the country’s growing needs for new equipment by diversifying among American, European and Asian military suppliers.”
link to

‘Many killed’ amid fresh Syria protests
Activists say at least 23 people have been killed, most of them after the army shelled town in northern Idlib province.
link to

Syrian army starts crackdown in northern town
Troops deployed in Jisr al-Shughur, as deaths are reported in protests elsewhere in the country after Friday prayers.
link to

Syria: What happened at Jisr al-Shugour?
A few days ago a battle took place in the northern Syrian town of Jisr al-Shugour that drove refugees into Turkey for the first time since the uprising started and was possibly a first sign of defection or mutiny from the security services.
link to

Fears for Syrian child protesters amid fresh reports of deaths
New reports of child protesters being tortured and killed in Syria raise concerns about the treatment of those still in detention.
link to

Turkey Syria Refugees Now Number About 1,600: Official
GUVECCI, Turkey — About 1,000 Syrians fleeing violence crossed into Turkey overnight, raising the total number of refugees in the country to 1,600, a Turkish official said Thursday. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said his country will continue to accept all Syrians who flee, but he also has urged Syria’s government to adopt reforms aimed at ending the unrest.
link to

Syrian soldier ‘ordered to fire’ on peaceful protesters
A former member of the Republican Guard has told Amnesty International that he and other soldiers were ordered to open fire on unarmed pro-reform demonstrators.
link to

The Lede: Videos Show Defectors From Syrian Army, Activists Say
Two videos uploaded to YouTube on Tuesday purport to show defectors from Syria’s security forces. If genuine, the accounts they give offer an insight into the behavior of the Syrian security forces and the internal strains they face.
link to

Syrian reports suggest divisions in security forces
An official Syrian news report says the gunmen who killed soldiers in Jisr Shughur were wearing military uniforms. If true, it lends credence to reports of clashes between security forces loyal to Assad and others who oppose the crackdown on protesters. Gunmen in “military uniform and government cars” were responsible for the recent killings of as many as 120 Syrian security forces in the northwestern city of Jisr Shughur, the official Syrian Arab News Agency said Wednesday.
link to

Syrians decry ‘torture’ of teenage protester
Video emerges appearing to show body of Syrian boy killed in crackdown, as Russia rejects Security Council resolution.
link to

Has Syria’s peaceful uprising turned into an insurrection?
The Syrian regime’s claims that 120 soldiers and security personnel were killed in Jisr al-Shughur over the weekend have intensified the debate over who is behind the uptick in armed resistance.
link to

Day of the clans in Syria
Elements of the Syrian opposition movement have marked tomorrow as the Day of the Clans.  When I hear of any revival of the reactionary clans or tribes and their polygamous male elders, I always detect the hand of colonial powers. They always rejuvenate, empower, fund, and arm the tribes to push their agenda: this is true of Western colonial powers and of Israel.  Am I saying that the protests in Syria are the making of outside colonial powers? No, I will repeat what I say: there are two forces going on in Syria: there is a genuine, real, and sincere domestic protest movement, and there is an outside external conspiracy managed by Saudi Arabia through the reactionary Syrian Muslim Brotherhood.   It is the task of progressives who want the downfall of the Syrian regime (people like me) to stress the need for regime change (not reform) and for fierce opposition of the Saudi-managed elements of the Syrian opposition.  Finally, the notion that all protests in Syria are part of an outside conspiracy, as is claimed by the Syrian regime, should be dismissed out of hand.
link to

Syrian Communist Party (the Bakdash branch)
The Syrian Communist Party and the Iraqi Communist Parties are among the worst in the region.  Both have lent support to the Ba`thist rules, and both have stood by why the regimes killed and tortured communists.  The Syrian Communist Party (Bakdsah branch) has issued a communique enthusiastically supporting regime oppression and repression.
link to

Is there really a ‘Gay Girl in Damascus’?
Probably not.
link to

Yemen Protesters Continue To Demand Wounded President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s Ouster
SANAA, Yemen — Nearly 100,000 Yemenis protested Friday in a main square of the capital demanding that the wounded president, currently outside the country, be removed from power. The rally, held after weekly Muslim prayers, was the biggest since President Ali Abdullah Saleh was wounded in a blast that hit a mosque where he was praying in his presidential palace on June 3. Heavily burned, Saleh was rushed to Saudi Arabia for treatment along with a number of top officials from his regime who also were wounded in the blast.
link to

Ahmed Ali Saleh, Yemen President’s Son, Fights To Maintain Father’s Power
SANAA, Yemen — Yemen’s president, out of the country recuperating from wounds from an attack on his palace, still has a powerful hand on the ground at home: his son. Ahmed Ali Saleh commands Yemen’s most highly trained troops, has them deployed in the streets of the capital and seems determined to preserve his father’s rule against enormous pressure at home and abroad. The grip of President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s son – and his nephews, who also command major military units – locks Yemen into a standoff between his forces and the opposition that, if it drags on, will almost inevitably collapse back into new violence. It also appears to be a major obstacle in U.S.-backed efforts to negotiate an end to the crisis while the president is away.
link to

Yemen’s Saleh out of intensive care: state media
SANAA (AFP) – Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh is out of intensive care in neighbouring Saudi Arabia where he is being treated for bomb blast wounds, state media said, prompting celebratory gunfire.
link to

YEMEN: The human cost of the conflict
DUBAI 09 June 2011 (IRIN) – Political violence has displaced thousands in Yemen, while a three-fold increase in the cost of food and water, combined with fuel shortages, is straining the ability of families to cope, aid workers warn.
link to

Out of Arabia
I have a piece in this week’s roundtable in Bitterlemons International, on US foreign policy in the Middle East after the Arab spring. In it I make a radical argument (at least within foreign policy circles, outside of Chalmers Johnson and Andrew Bacevich anyway) that America needs to end its imperial posture in the Middle East, that the Arab spring provided an opportunity to articulate this and that Obama failed to do so clearly in his speech. I call this argument “Out of Arabia” and the piece is here. The other contributions are by Dan Kurtzer, Joel Beinin and Chuck Freilich, and all but Kurtzer’s are fairly critical of the Obama administration. Kurtzer’s piece argues that Obama introduced a new idea of individual self-determination in his recent speech, with possible far-reaching consequences. All are worth a gander.
link to

Seymour Hersh, the acclaimed journalist who, in 1970, won a Pulitzer Prize for uncovering the My Lai massacre in Vietnam and has subsequently broken many other important stories dealing with America’s foreign and national security policies (e.g., prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib), has published his most recent article, on U.S. intelligence assessments of Iran’s nuclear […]
link to

Surgeries canceled in Gaza due to lack of supplies

Jun 10, 2011


and other news from Today in Palestine:

Land, property, resources theft & destruction / Ethnic cleansing / Settlers

I’m either an illegal citizen of one state, or an inferior citizen in another / Jalal Abukhater
RAMALLAH Salem-News 10 June – I am considered under the Israeli law to be an illegal citizen of the Palestinian West Bank and I am supposed to avoid it as an area of danger while Jewish settlers are allowed to come from all over the world and settle legally (under Israeli law) in the Palestinian West Bank. I am a Palestinian who lives in the occupied eastern part of Jerusalem. I am required to carry around my blue identification card which permits me to cross checkpoints daily from my house in Jerusalem to my school in Ramallah and vice versa. Carrying the blue identification card enables me to travel “freely” across the West Bank and 1948 Palestine while those carrying West Bank and Gaza IDs are not able to leave those areas without special Israeli issued permits. Having said that, however, carrying this blue ID is more of a curse than it is a blessing.
link to

Jerusalem Old City’s Jewish Quarter almost entirely haredi
Haaretz 10 June — Neighborhood has resumed the ultra-Orthodox character it had before the 1948 War of Independence … Rubin and Bar also noted that finds from archaeological digs carried out in the Jewish Quarter are displayed to the public in ways that highlight the area’s Jewish history at the expense of its Christian and Muslim history. A sign in the Jewish Quarter designating the location of a Crusader-era church, for example, has been replaced with one that simply labels the location an archaeological park.  
link to

Syria refugee’s dream of return ends in tragedy
JERUSALEM (AFP) 10 June — When Ezzat Maswadi burst across the ceasefire line from Syria into the occupied Golan Heights, he thought his chance to return to Jerusalem — the city of his birth — had finally come. But the return that Maswadi had longed for was not to be, and his attempts to reach the Holy City would eventually lead to his death, three weeks later, in the fields between Syria and the Golan town of Majdal Shams. Born to a Palestinian family in Jerusalem in 1977, Maswadi grew up in the nearby town of Al-Eizariya until 1984, when his family moved first to Jordan and then to Syria. His father moved back to Jerusalem shortly afterward, but Maswadi and his mother were told they had lost their residency permits under an Israeli law which quietly revoked the residency of anyone who stayed away more than three years.
link to

Returning from afar
JPost 9 June — …In the farthest reaches of northeast India, along the border with Burma and Bangladesh, live the Bnei Menashe (Hebrew for “the sons of Manasseh”). They are descendants of one of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel… And now, after so many centuries, God is rewarding them for their faithfulness and bringing them back. Over the past decade, Shavei Israel has brought 1,700 Bnei Menashe to Israel, where they have been absorbed successfully into the Jewish state. Another 7,232 remain in India, awaiting their chance to return. Over the past year, Israel’s government has been deliberating whether to allow the rest of the community to make aliya. It is expected soon to pass a decision that will enable all the remaining Bnei Menashe to come home to Zion.
link to

Incursions / Clashes

Israeli police enter Al Aqsa Mosque, firing tear gas to disperse stone-throwing Palestinians
Israeli police stormed the venerated Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem on Friday, firing teargas at Palestinians who had assembled there. The police briefly entered the flashpoint Al-Aqsa mosque compound after Friday prayers and fired tear gas towards stone-throwing youths, police and mosque officials said. “After prayers some of the Arab youths started throwing stones,” a Jerusalem police spokeswoman said. “There were no injuries but when the stone throwing continued, police and border police entered the mosque compound to disperse the youths before leaving.” Police fired tear gas and one person was arrested, she said. A spokesman for the Islamic authorities that run the mosque said one or two youths had been throwing stones, but the incident ended quickly. The sprawling mosque compound contains the Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock [shrine] and is the third holiest site in Islam after Mecca and Medina.
link to

Palestinian injured in clashes with settlers near Ramallah
RAMALLAH (Ma‘an) 10 June — A 65-year-old Palestinian was shot and injured Friday during clashes with Israeli settlers and soldiers near Ramallah, witnesses said. Locals told Ma‘an that dozens of settlers tried to enter an illegal outpost near Kafr Malik village, which had been evacuated by Israeli forces. Villagers tried to stop the settlers, who were supported by Israeli soldiers. Clashes erupted and Yousif Hamad Al-Qaq was shot and injured, onlookers said.
link to

PCHR: Weekly report on Israeli human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territory – June 2-8
Shooting: During the reporting period, IOF wounded 30 Palestinian civilians, including 12 children and a woman, in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Twenty nine of them were wounded in the West Bank and the thirtieth was wounded in the Gaza Strip, and the majority of them were wounded in peaceful demonstrations. In the West Bank, On 02 June 2011, a Palestinian child from Fraata village, northeast of Qalqilya, was wounded when a group of settlers from “Havat Gilad” settlement raided Palestinian lands in Fraata village and set fire to lands planted with wheat and stoned Palestinian farmers. The settlers then called IOF who rushed to the scene to provide protection to settlers. IOF started firing tear gas canisters and rubber-coated metal bullets at Palestinians. Asaad al-Tawil, 16, was hit as a result by a tear gas canister to his left eye … In the Gaza Strip, a Palestinian civilian was wounded on 07 June 2011 when IOF positioning on observation towers at the border near Beit Hanoun “Erez” crossing, in the far north of the Gaza Strip, opened intensive fire at a group of Palestinian and international demonstrators who were nearly 300 meters from the border fence to the north of the Agricultural School of al-Azhar University, north of Beit Hanoun.. ..
link to

Activism / Solidarity

2 injured in Hebron anti-settlement rally
HEBRON (Ma‘an) 10 June — Israeli forces injured two Palestinians and detained two activists on Friday at a demonstration against illegal settlements near Hebron, activists said. Rateb Al-Habor, coordinator of the local committee against settlements, said dozens of Palestinian and international activists joined the peaceful rally after Friday prayers. Al-Habor said Israeli forces fired tear gas and rubber-coated steel bullets at protesters. He said Adham Muhammad Ahmad Shawaheen, 22, and Fadel Ahmad Muhammad Ad-Dababseh, were both hit by tear-gas canisters. Israeli forces detained Qasem Muhammad Hasan Abu Arram, 50, and a 30-year-old Israeli activist, he added.
link to

Photos: Protest in Nabi Saleh consumed by tear gas / Joseph Dana
972mag 10 June — Unusually high levels of tear gas were used in an attempt to crush the weekly unarmed demonstration today at Nabi Saleh. Roughly 40 new (and many first time) Israeli supporters joined the demonstration today, led by IPCRI director Gershom Baskin. From the demonstration, Baskin repeatedly contacted the Israeli army and informed them of the high numbers of Israelis present and the desire to maintain a non-violent, unarmed demonstration. Despite this, the demonstrators were only able to march about 100 meters inside the village before they were attacked by tear gas.
link to

At-Tuwani reflections: Healing the trees
CPT 7 June — We start slowly, our delegation members, several men, a handful of women, a sprinkling of children. As we walk out of the Palestinian village of At-Tuwani the procession grows, women cutting across fields, children scrambling down hillsides.  Some of the boys carry hoes; the women swing buckets; a young child waves a Palestinian flag.  We are on our way to a small olive orchard in the valley to take part in a healing ritual, but the conversation, in Arabic, sounds chatty, neighbors exchanging the tidbits that make up daily life.  A few of the children try to bring us into the loop with their schoolroom English; we try a few Arabic phrases.  When we reach the orchard, we pause.  I know in my head that Israeli settlers who live across the valley from At-Tuwani sometimes sneak down at night and chop down the villagers’ olive trees.  But seeing the wounded trees myself cuts more deeply. The breaks are jagged, branches twisting off the trunk, the silver-green leaves curling in the dust.  Ten trees have been hacked off, an attempt to chop down Palestinian life in the South Hebron Hills.
link to

Jewish outrage as Greens host Gaza ‘freedom’ event
Australian 11 June — The NSW Greens continue to support protests against Israel, with the party’s upper house leader David Shoebridge to host a function at Parliament House next week for an activist group preparing to head to Gaza. Jewish community leaders have criticised the Greens’ hosting of the Farewell to Freedom Flotilla event, saying it uses taxpayer-funded facilities to encourage groups to break international law.
link to

Gaza – under siege for 1,458 days now

Ministry: Surgeries canceled in Gaza due to shortages
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 10 June — Doctors in Gaza have been forced to cancel surgeries due to critical shortages of medicine and supplies, a health ministry official said Friday. Ministry undersecretary Hasen Khalef said eye surgeries, and operations on blood vessels and nerves were among those canceled due to the lack of medication. Gaza Health Minister Bassem Naem said prescheduled surgeries — including children’s operations, cardiac catheterization, laparoscopic surgery and bone and nerve operations — would be stopped … Khalef said dental clinics and general practice clinics would be forced to close soon, and that health centers would reduce their hours because of the shortages.
link to

Israel closes sole Gaza crossing for goods and aid
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 10 June — Israeli authorities decided to close Gaza’s sole operating crossing for goods and aid until Sunday, Palestinian officials said … Egypt ended its role in Israel’s siege on May 28, permanently reopening the Rafah crossing on its border with Gaza. While the decision allowed the free movement of most Gaza residents for the first time in four years, the terminal is not equipped for the import or export of goods or aid.
link to

Cairo denies reports of arms smuggling through Egypt
EL-ARISH, Egypt (Ma‘an) 10 June — Military leaders in the Sinai Peninsula on Friday denied allegations that new smuggling routes had been established through Egypt into Gaza. The Hebrew-language newspaper Maariv on Friday said Israeli security officials had received information that weapons were being smuggled from Libya to the Gaza Strip via Egypt. According to the report, the uprising against Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi had allowed the flow of arms into the hands of arms dealers and “terror organizations” in Libya … Egyptian military sources denied the report, and said no weapons entered Egypt from Libya, noting that officers inspected all passengers entering from Libya through As-Saloum crossing.
link to

Palestinians plan ‘flotilla march’
Ynet 10 June — Pro-Palestinian activists have issued a Facebook call urging supporters to stage yet another march – the “return march” – this time to coincide with the arrival of the second Gaza-bound flotilla, planned for late June. The organizers said that this march is meant to commemorate “Nakba Day” and “Naksa Day” casualties. Once again, they urged participants to storm all of Israel’s borders.
link to

US activists prepare to break Israel’s blockade on Gaza / Alex Kane
EI 10 June — Recent weeks have seen renewed attention on the blockade of Gaza as international activists’ efforts to break Israel’s blockade with a flotilla come to a head. The Israeli government has begun to ramp up its propaganda efforts, claiming the flotilla has ties to terrorism. The United States government has warned activists working against the blockade, with a State Department spokesman telling reporters earlier this month that “groups and individuals who seek to break Israel’s maritime blockade of Gaza are taking irresponsible and provocative actions” (State Department press briefing, 1 June 2011). But while the flotilla is only beginning to make headlines now, it’s been a long time in the works. The organizing for an American boat to join the flotilla began a year ago.
link to

Israel warns Inmarsat over Gaza flotilla
7 June — JERUSALEM: An Israeli group said yesterday that it had warned satellite navigation giant Inmarsat it could face legal action for providing services to ships trying to breach the naval blockade on Gaza. The Israel Law Centre said it had sent a letter to London-based Inmarsat cautioning it that supplying navigation services to a flotilla of 15 ships which is expected to sail for Gaza later this month, would violate the US Neutrality Act that bars helping groups considered hostile to an allied country. Inmarsat “is exposing itself to criminal liability and massive financial suits if it supplies satellite services to boats participating in the flotilla to Gaza,” the Centre said.
link to

Inside the jail of Gaza – Walking to the Buffer Zone  / Johnny Barber
Counterpunch 10-12 June — We marched to the buffer zone with about 20 others including members of the Beit Hanoun Local Initiative who have been organizing non-violent demonstrations for the past three years, as well as several members of GYBO (Gaza Youth Break Out). Carrying flags and alternately chanting, singing and walking in silence we approached the Israeli border. This is a no go zone for Palestinians. Israel has deemed that 300 meters from the wall is a buffer zone, so Palestinian farmland is taken away. Waving flags and chanting we reached the edge of the buffer zone and continued walking. Almost immediately, dust kicked up just ahead of us, a warning shot rang out. We stopped, daring to go no further. Climbing a small embankment we waved our Palestinian flags and chanted to the soldiers hidden in the guard towers. Not five minutes passed and 2 shots rang out, one kicking up dust at our feet. 19 year old Mohammed Kafarna grabbed his neck, turned, and ran back in the direction we had come. He had been hit with shrapnel
link to


Israel detains Hamas leader from Jenin
JENIN (Ma‘an) 10 June — Israeli forces detained Hamas leader and former minister Wasfi Qabaha overnight Thursday from his home in the West Bank city of Jenin, witnesses said. Locals said soldiers surrounded Qabaha’s home amid intensive shooting and took the 50-year-old to an unknown location. In 2007, Qabaha was arrested by Israeli forces and detained without charge for three years under administrative detention.
An Israeli military spokeswoman said troops detained eight Palestinians overnight from the West Bank. Locals in Hussan village west of Bethlehem said Israeli troops detained 22-year-old Muhammad Shusha in a dawn raid on his father’s home.
link to

Palestinian women stripped naked during provocative prison search.
WEST BANK, (PIC) 9 June — Four Palestinian women detained at the Israeli HaSharon prison were stripped naked during a humiliating and provocative cell search, those women told the Ahrar prisoner studies center. The names of the women held for alleged security reasons were left undisclosed. The search was conducted by ten female and five male prison guards and security and intelligence officials as well as the director of Room 2, where the women reside. The crew was looking for a mobile phone allegedly smuggled into the prison by one of the women. Each woman was strip searched separately inside the unit in a way they described as humiliating and “conflicting with ethics and morals.”
link to

Israeli jailer takes photos of Palestinian captive during a strip search
RAMALLAH, (PIC) 10 June — The Palestinian Prisoner Society (PPS) has strongly deprecated Thursday the Israeli occupation authority over the “strip search” policy it practices against the Palestinian captives in its jails. Lawyer of the PPS revealed that an Israeli guard in Majeddo prison took some pictures of a Palestinian captive after he subjected him to a strip search prompting the captive to strongly protest this Israeli assault against him … The Israeli practice was meant to humiliate Palestinian captives and is a blatant violation of international laws and ethics on prisoners. The captive went on hunger-strike for three days to protest the Israeli action against him. He was placed in solitary confinement before the guards forcibly transferred him and his three comrades to Shatta, the PPS pointed out.
link to

Hamas: PA detained affiliate
BETHLEHEM (Ma‘an) 10 June — Hamas on Friday accused Palestinian Authority security forces of detaining a party member from Siris village near Jenin. The Islamist movement said forces from the Fatah-led PA detained Islam Abu Ali, a student at the Arab American University in Jenin. On Tuesday, Hamas said PA forces detained four party affiliates across the West Bank.
link to

Political / Diplomatic / International news

Real peace only possible ‘if Hamas on board’
JERUSALEM (AFP) 10 June — A lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians is only possible if Hamas is involved, a group of former top statesmen and diplomats said in a letter made public on Friday. In the letter, which is addressed to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, 24 former international figures warned against the dangers of rejecting a recent Palestinian unity deal aimed at ending years of bad blood between the secular Fatah faction and Gaza’s Hamas rulers. Israel slammed the deal as a “great victory for terrorism” in a move which found echoes in Washington, with US President Barack Obama describing it as “an enormous obstacle to peace.”
link to

Haniyeh: No differences among Hamas leaders
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) 10 June — Gaza government Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh said Friday that there were no internal differences among Hamas leaders. Speaking at Friday prayers in Gaza City, the premier denied media reports of internal disagreements within the Islamist movement … Haniyeh said Hamas would not negotiate with Israel or concede Palestinians’ rights. In May, Damascus-based Hamas chief Khalid Mash‘al said the party was willing to allow the PLO to negotiate with Israel for a period of time in order to prove that talks would lead nowhere.
link to

Hamas leaders open Facebook pages in attempt to woo Palestinian public
Haaretz 10 June — A few leading Hamas figures have opened Facebook pages over the past few weeks, as part of the organization’s broader attempt to win hearts and minds among the Palestinian public to reverse its declining support in both the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. According to an opinion poll published Wednesday by the Jerusalem Media and Communications Center, 39.2 percent of West Bank and Gaza Palestinians have faith in Fatah, while only 16.6 percent put their trust in Hamas. Hamas is now trying to rebrand itself as a more open and, above all, a more moderate movement.
link to

Haaretz exclusive: Secret cables show Israel’s battle plan over Palestinian UN bid
10 June — Israel has started mobilizing its embassies for the battle against UN recognition of a Palestinian state in September, ordering its diplomats to convey that this would delegitimize Israel and foil any chance for future peace talks. Envoys are being asked to lobby the highest possible officials in their countries of service, muster support from local Jewish communities, ply the media with articles arguing against recognition and even ask for a call or quick visit from a top Israeli official if they think it would help. Foreign Ministry Director General Rafael Barak and the heads of various ministry departments sent out classified cables outlining the battle plan to the embassies over the past week, after earlier ordering all the country’s diplomats to cancel any vacations planned for September. The contents of the cables reached Haaretz and are reported here in full. 
link to

Minister: Berlin to advise Palestinians against statehood bid
BERLIN (AFP) 10 June — A high-level German diplomatic mission to the Middle East will try to convince Palestinians next week to drop plans to gain UN recognition for an independent state in September, a minister said Friday.
link to

US senators oppose Israel return to 1967 lines
AFP 10 June — US senators proposed a resolution on Thursday opposing any Israeli withdrawal to 1967 lines, dealing a symbolic blow to President Barack Obama’s efforts to renew peace talks. “It is contrary to United States policy and national security to have the borders of Israel return to the armistice lines that existed on June 4, 1967,” read the text introduced by Senators Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, and Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut Independent. The resolution, which enjoys the support of some 30 other senators [out of 100], including Democrats, says US policy aims to “support and facilitate Israel in maintaining defensible borders.”
link to

Other news

Al-Quds Brigades arrest suspected collaborator
GAZA CITY (Ma‘an) — Islamic Jihad’s armed wing the Al-Quds Brigades on Friday announced the arrest of a collaborator accused of involvement in the assassination of 16 resistance fighters. The brigades said the collaborator was identified after several months of intensive monitoring and interrogations by the group’s security department … The collaborator was handed over to the Hamas-led Interior Ministry in Gaza to be brought to trial, the brigades said. The Hamas-led government in Gaza has executed six men accused of collaboration, most recently on May 4.
link to

Low-profile, influential Hamas founder Shama dies
GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) 10 June — A founder of Hamas in the Gaza Strip died Friday of a stroke after decades as an influential yet little-known figure at the helm of the Palestinian militant organization. He was 76. Muhammad Hassan Sham‘a, revered by Hamas loyalists but nearly anonymous outside Gaza, was one of the eight founders of the Islamist group in the 1980s. After his death, Hamas publicly announced Friday for the first time that Sham‘a had been the leader of the secretive Shura Council, its top governing body.
The identity of the council’s members is a closely guarded secret because of fears they could be targeted by Israel. The founder and first leader of Hamas, Sheik Ahmed Yassin, was killed by an Israeli airstrike in 2004.
link to

Agriculture ministry: Watermelons not contaminated
RAMALLAH (Ma‘an) 10 June — The Palestinian Authority agriculture ministry said Thursday that reports of toxic chemicals in watermelons in the West Bank were false. According to media reports, watermelons grown in settlements and sold in the West Bank contained traces of hormones and pesticides. The ministry said it conducted tests on watermelon samples from across the West Bank at the An-Najjah University in Nablus, but found no traces of contamination. Watermelons grown in illegal settlements are sold in the West Bank despite a government-led boycott of settlement produce. Palestinian Authority Agriculture Minster Ismail Du’eik said the government had a trade agreement with Israel to buy watermelons from settlements, in exchange for Israel buying Palestinian-grown cucumbers, the official PA news Agency Wafa reported.
link to

Light rail segregation has heavy price / Tali Farkash
Ynet 10 June — Allotting one of train’s cars to sexual segregation may be democratic, but zealots won’t stop there … While Israelis were busy with the cheesecakes and flower arrangements that go along with Shavuot earlier this week, haredi zealots have been busy with their next battle: Imposing the ‘kosher bus’ rules on the Jerusalem light rail …  in actuality, the light rail is just another battle in the war on gendered freedom of movement in Israel. This war is no longer just about specific buses in specific haredi areas. It is a nationwide war which currently includes sidewalks, supermarkets, planes, and HMOs with separate medical services.
link to

Analysis / Opinion

UK anti-Sharia legislator backed Israel group calling for ethnic cleansing of Palestinians / Ali Abunimah
EI blog 9 June — A legislator who has introduced an ‘anti-Sharia’ bill into the UK parliament supposedly in the name of equality agreed to serve as co-president of an Israeli organization that favors expulsion of Palestinians, denies the Nakba, and espouses extreme anti-Muslim views … Cox’s endorsement of extremist racist The Jerusalem Summit, and her introduction of laws targeting Muslims in the UK in the name of “equality” is a marker of the increasingly close alliance between Zionists and Islamophobes and their attempt to stir up Islamophobia in Europe and the United States in order to bolster support for Israel as a supposed bulwark against a mythical Muslim invasion characterized by “creeping Sharia.” Just this week in the United States, Republican presidential hopeful Herman Cain said he would require a special loyalty oath to be administered to Muslims appointed to government positions. There is not such much a creeping, but rather a galloping alliance between pro-Israel extremists and Islamophobes that is causing dangerous polarization in the United States and Europe, largely for the sake of Israel.
link to

Pro-Israelis turning US into Islamophobic police state / Maidhc Ó Cathail
MEMO 10 June — The recent call by U.S. Senator Charles Schumer for increased rail safety funding and the creation of a “no-ride” list for Amtrak trains is yet another reminder of just who is stoking fear of Muslims in America. In an interview last year with a Jewish radio talk show in New York, Senator Schumer said he believed that HaShem (an Orthodox Jewish term for “God”) gave him the name “Schumer” — which means “guardian” — so that he could fulfill his “very important” role in the U.S. Senate as a “guardian of Israel.” Presumably, Schumer’s God-given role also includes turning the country he is actually paid to represent — the United States — into an Islamophobic police state. Americans wondering what happened to their freedoms since 9/11 need to understand the key role played by ardent pro-Israelis like Schumer in undermining their civil liberties under the guise of protecting them from terrorism.
link to

This Week in History: RFK is shot a year after Six Day War
JPost 10 June — Robert Kennedy is shot by a Christian Palestinian man from Jerusalem upset by the senator’s pledge to supply Israel with Phantom fighter jets —  Born in 1944, Sirhan Sirhan fled his Jerusalem home during Israel’s 1948 War of Independence. Soon thereafter, he and his entire family moved to the United States where he attended school, including several years at a local college. But despite his many years in the US, Sirhan’s heart remained with the Palestinian people. Following the Arab defeat in the 1967 Six Day War, he told American news program Inside Edition in a 1989 interview, he was “downcast and crestfallen.” … Robert Kennedy, the younger brother of assassinated US president John F. Kennedy, had been a hero to Sirhan Sirhan. “He was my champion, he was the defender of the downtrodden,” he later said in an interview, believing himself to be the downtrodden that RFK had pledged to defend. But when Sirhan heard that Kennedy was promising to supply military jets to Israel, he felt personally betrayed  … Sirhan Sirhan remains in a California prison to this day.
link to (listserv) (archives)

One missile, one playground: The will of Gaza

Jun 10, 2011

Ramzy Baroud

A “Hamas commander” drove a beat-up gray van in northern Gaza and theatrically spoke on his walkie-talkie as I sat in the passenger seat. The van was almost barren, save for the most basic equipment propelling it to move forward over the bumpy roads of an overcrowded refugee camp.

Iyad was not here to show me any militant training camp, or even to assess the damage that had befallen the impoverished Gaza Strip during Israel’s devastating war, Operation Cast Lead, which killed and wounded thousands in 2008-09. Scars of the damage sustained during the three-week onslaught are still visible throughout the Strip. Iyad was here to show me his latest personal project: a playground for refugee children.

At first glance, the “playground” did not seem impressive at all. All I noticed was a small plot of dirt jammed between two unsightly concrete buildings.

“So, what do you think?” asked Iyad, with a proud smile. His attempt at growing a full beard was not entirely successful, giving him a younger, albeit disheveled appearance.

“It’s impressive,” I replied, still trying to understand the nature of the accomplishment.

I learned later that the achievement was creating space out of the debris. At one time prior to December 2008, when an Israeli missile decided to drop in, a family had lived in this spot. The house had collapsed, and its residents became mere posters of mourned Palestinian faces adorning the walls of other houses in the neighborhood.

Iyad and few of “Shabab Al-Masjid” — youth of the mosque — cleared almost everything, using only their bare hands and other primitive means. The siege had made it nearly impossible to access modern technology to clear the uncountable tons of concrete scattered in and around Gaza as a result of the war. Cement remains a precious commodity in an area that needs building material above most other resources. People here somehow remain positive.

“And here will be a soccer field,” continued Iyad, who seemed to have no budget whatsoever, except the will of the “shabab”.

Predictably, Iyad’s residence is located in a refugee camp. What seemed to be a large crack around much of the house was in fact a mark left by an Israeli missile, which blew up most of the house. Iyad’s entire family — his brothers, their wives and about two dozen children — were watching TV in a room that miraculously managed to stay still as the house imploded. The neighbors rushed looking for dead and survivors, only to find everyone alive and well.

Iyad smiled in wonder.

When the unmanned drone began circling above his head, Iyad knew that the Israelis had located him. So he began running.

“I didn’t want them to know where I lived, so I began running without a clear sense of direction,” said Iyad, who reiterated that he always prepared himself for such a moment. “I am not scared of death. Life and death is in God’s hand, not some Israeli pilot, but I worried about my family.”

Then, Iyad’s house came down.

Since then, the house has been rebuilt, although in a haphazard way. New additions to the house stand above the deep cracks. There are no guarantees that the foundation is safe, or if the house is even inhabitable at all. Oblivious to war, death, unarmed drones and shaky foundations, the children are full of life.

Three of the boys in Iyad’s household carry the same name. It was the name of Iyad’s brother who was killed by an Israeli sniper as he protested the occupation during the First Palestinian Uprising (Intifada) of 1987. It was this very event that changed Iyad’s life forever. In a moment, the little boy had become a man, as expected of any “brother of a martyr”.

Iyad’s niece — a cute girl in a checkered dress — was asked to perform her nashid, a song she had learned in the street. She did so with untold enthusiasm. The song referenced paradise and martyrs and “right of return,” and of children facing missiles with bare chests. The crowed clapped, and the girl huddled by my side bashfully. Perhaps she had not expected such a passionate response from her audience. She was five years old.

Iyad, who is now studying at a local Gaza university, already speaks of a Master’s degree and a teaching career. He also remains consumed by his playground and the challenges awaiting him and the “youth of the mosque” once the uneven ground is completely flattened.

His nieces and nephews sing for the martyrs, but they are also keen to do their homework. They discuss end-of-year exams with dread and excitement. All the boys are fans of Barcelona, and devotees of a man named Lionel Messi.

“When I grow up, I wanted to study physical education,” said one of the boys, a teenager of about 14. ‘I will specialize in soccer, just like Messi’s major at the University of Barcelona,’ he added excitedly.
I laughed, and so did everyone else.

Ramzy Baroud is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of

Challenging anti-Semitism must be rooted in opposing racism, not defending Israel

Jun 10, 2011

Yaman Salahi

Yale’s recent decision to terminate the Yale Institute for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti-Semitism is slowly drawing more attention, the news emerging initially in the dark recesses of the New York Post and slowly making its way out to the Jerusalem Post. I had occasion to criticize the center for an overtly right-wing, anti-Muslim conference that it hosted last year in the Yale Daily News and in the Washington Post’s OnFaith feature. While Yale’s official position is that the center was closed because it failed to produce quality scholarship or to sufficiently involve campus faculty, right-wing websites like the New York Post have suggested that the real reasons lie elsewhere. In particular, commentators have hinted that the center was closed because it may have encumbered the solicitation of Arab money, as if that forms a significant part of Yale’s funding, and because criticism of Muslims is, supposedly, too politically incorrect for Yale to handle – despite the dividends that aggressive and abusive language about Muslims often pays in American politics.

Set aside the clearly suspect undertones in those two claims. Whatever actually led to the university’s decision is left, for now, to the exclusive knowledge of insiders and their private motivations. But if it were true that Yale cancelled the program to appeal to donors – rather unlikely as that appears – then its decision would deserve nothing but opprobrium. In truth, the center merited criticism because it pursued an agenda that did a disservice to the study of anti-Semitism by entangling it with crude anti-Muslim and anti-Arab politics. Though the center was ostensibly about one form of racism, it was blind to the point of denial about other kinds that were on open display at its events, particularly against Arabs and Palestinians.

It is truly regrettable that the center delegitimized its own work in this fashion, not least because we are at an important crossroads when it comes to ideas about anti-Semitism. For decades, the idea of anti-Semitism has been in the hands of people who have used it to defend terrible injustices by Israel. My criticism of the center rested on the principle that racism is wrong because of what it does, not because of whom it targets. I was pointing to the tension between nationalist opposition to racism and humanist opposition to racism. So long as the study of and opposition to anti-Semitism is rooted in Zionist nationalism rather than humanism, it is a project doomed to produce irreconcilable conflicts and great harms rather than more possibilities for justice. If, on the other hand, opposition to anti-Semitism is based on a sense of justice, then it is simply inconsistent to perpetuate injustice in Palestine on the basis of opposition to anti-Semitism. The two positions – opposition to anti-Semitism and active support for justice, freedom, and equality for the Palestinians – must, instead, accommodate and reinforce one another.

The Yale Institute for the Interdisciplinary Study of Anti-Semitism failed to do that. Rather, its work was the justification of Israeli violence, militarization, and dispossession, regardless of its human costs. Its chief business was political, to rationalize support for Israel and its policies as a type of anti-racism, as absurd as that may seem. Much can be said about the center’s political agenda, but the core idea that it promoted, namely, that anti-Semitism is an attack on Israeli nationalism rather than an attack on human dignity, must continue to be challenged, even if the center is now closed.

Yaman Salahi is third-year law student at Yale and a a member of Students for Justice in Palestine.

More lies Weiner told us (#9: Jordan River is eastern border of Israel)

Jun 10, 2011

Lizzy Ratner

Today the media is once again aflutter with the “Sext, Lies, and Weinergate” scandal: Weiner’s wife is pregnant! His fellow Democrats are ready to dump him! His fifth lady friend has come forward! Hour by hour, sordid new details emerge, all breathlessly reported. And yet, as with all sex scandals, the prurient, puritanical thrill of watching a dog go down soon gives way to the feeling that the guy is getting it for the wrong crime. Sure the guy is a sleaze with a serious death wish – or is it God complex? – but what about the fact that he’s also a latter-day Jabotinsky who’s content to lie and deny for the sake of occupation, dispossession, and institutionalized inequality?

On Tuesday, Phil resurrected – and debunked – some of the more outrageous lies Weiner told during a March debate with former Congressman Brian Baird about Gaza and the Goldstone Report. (The debate was sponsored by the Nation Institute on behalf of our book, The Goldstone Report: The Legacy of the Landmark Investigation of the Gaza Conflict.) Today we offer you round two of Weiner’s tall tales and outright lies. Among his more outlandish claims: Israel’s blockade of Gaza is legal and not all that bad; Gaza is not occupied; Hamas cast the first stone; and perhaps the biggest head-spinner of all, Israeli settlement activity is not taking place on Palestinian lands but in Israel.

Herewith, lies 6 through 12.

Lies 6 & 7: Israel’s blockade of Gaza is legal and hasn’t caused serious humanitarian hardship anyway.

Weiner: There is a blockade that is legal under the Geneva Convention going on right now by the Israelis and the Egyptians on against Gaza. Why? Because they’re at war! I don’t like that, I wish they weren’t. They’re at war. At times of war, you do not let in things that can be used to build – to build bunkers, to do these other things. Fifteen thousand tons of humanitarian aid flows into Gaza each and every week. That goes in in compliance with the Geneva Conventions.

Let’s start with Falsehood #6, the claim that Israel’s blockade of Gaza is legal. This is simply untrue, and the reasons are several. The first is that blockades are only, or at least primarily, deemed legal in situations of international and armed conflict, which the Israel-Gaza conflict most certainly is not. In fact, because Israel remains the de facto occupying power of Gaza – and this gets us to reason number two – it is required by international law not only to protect the civilians under its control but to guarantee sufficient access to food and medical supplies. The blockade, which has reduced food and other humanitarian supplies to a trickle, clearly violates this obligation, but that’s hardly all. The blockade is also widely considered to be a form of collective punishment inflicted on the people of Gaza for their support of Hamas – a fact that Israel has all but admitted – and collective punishment is not merely not legal, it is a flagrant violation of the Geneva Conventions. A war crime.

Or as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay has said:

International humanitarian law prohibits starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and … it is also prohibited to impose collective punishment on civilians.

I have consistently reported to member states that the blockade is illegal and must be lifted.

As to Falsehood #7, Weiner’s claims that 15,000 tons of humanitarian aid flow into Gaza each day so life can’t be all that bad, where does one begin? HereHere? What about here?

The devastating effect of Israel’s blockade has been well documented by journalists, human rights groups, humanitarian organizations, and, of course, Palestinians. The Goldstone Report also dedicated pages of ink to chronicling the blockade’s humanitarian and human rights toll on the people of Gaza.

But you know what? Why listen to all these sources when you can just listen to Israeli officials themselves, as paraphrased in one of the US cables released by Wikileaks?

“As part of their overall embargo plan against Gaza, Israeli officials have confirmed … on multiple occasions that they intend to keep the Gazan economy on the brink of collapse without quite pushing it over the edge.”

Lie 8: Israel no longer occupies Gaza.

Weiner: And is Gaza occupied? Let me just clear this up, is Gaza occupied, Brian?
Baird: I think it absolutely is.
Weiner: OK, so right now there are Israelis in Gaza?
Baird: No, but there are US-made F16s and US-made weaponry and a host of other –
Weiner: But not in Gaza.
Baird: On any given day, Israelis can enter Gaza.
Weiner: Yes, on any given day they can enter there, but they are not in Gaza today.
Baird: I don’t know that.
Weiner: They don’t occupy Gaza today. Yet the Goldstone Report characterized Gaza as still being occupied.

This is a popular meme, particularly among Israeli politicians and right-wing Zionists who love to claim that Gaza has not been occupied since Israel withdrew its troops and settlers from the strip in 2005. But pretty much everyone else in the international community, with the probable exception of the United States, continues to regard Gaza as being occupied. And with good reason. When a population is hemmed in on all sides by a foreign power, its borders closed and policed, even its airspace controlled; when that power controls everything from taxes to currency; and when it pays the local population occasional, unexpected visits in the form of military incursions, it’s hard to claim that the foreign power isn’t in control.

Here’s how the Goldstone Report sums up the situation:

Given the specific geopolitical configuration of the Gaza Strip, the powers that Israel exercises from the borders enable it to determine the conditions of life within the Gaza Strip. Israel controls the border crossings … and decides what and who gets in or out of the Gaza Strip. It also controls the territorial sea adjacent to the Gaza Strip and has declared a virtual blockade and limits to the fishing zone, thereby regulating economic activity in that zone. It also keeps complete control of the airspace of the Gaza Strip, inter alia, through continuous surveillance by aircraft and unmanned aviation vehicles (UAVs) or drones. It makes military incursions and from time to time hit targets within the Gaza Strip. No-go areas are declared within the Gaza Strip near the border where Israeli settlements used to be and enforced by the Israeli armed forces. Furthermore, Israel regulates the local monetary market based on the Israeli currency (the new sheqel) and controls taxes and custom duties.

The Goldstone Report’s conclusion? “The ultimate authority over the Occupied Palestinian Territory still lies with Israel.”

Lie 9: Israel’s ongoing settlement activity is not taking place on Palestinian lands but within Israel.

Weiner: There are people who believe that settlement activity is going on in Palestinian territories. There are people who believe that. I don’t believe that.

This one is a real head-scratcher. As Roger Cohen, New York Times columnist and moderator of the Baird-Weiner debate, pointed out at the time, even the Israeli government acknowledges – heck, proclaims – that it is building settlements. So how can Weiner claim there’s no “settlement activity” in Palestinian territories? There’s really only one possible answer, but it’s such an extreme, ludicrous answer, it seems impossible that Weiner could actually believe it. And yet – well, let’s just run the tape.

Cohen: Where do you think the settlement growth is happening right now?

Weiner: What do you mean, where do I think it’s happening?

Cohen: You just said it’s happening in Israel, where in Israel?

Weiner: I don’t follow your question. What do you mean where it’s happening? It’s a matter of fact where the settlement’s happening. I don’t understand your question.

Cohen: Well, I’m asking you whether – you said it’s in Israel, as far as I know, the settlement growth is in the West Bank.

Weiner: I believe it is in Israel.

Baird: Tony, are you saying that wherever there is a settlement it is by definition Israel?

Weiner: I am saying that at some point, and it’s not going to be the three of us, but at some point, Palestinians and Israelis are going to negotiate where development is going to be able to happen, where the border exists; right now the settlement that’s going on is going on in Israel. That’s not a controversial thing to say. I mean, that’s a matter of fact. You may want in the future, where Israeli homes are, to say that’s the Palestinian border but that’s not the case yet.

Cohen: Congressman, where for you is the border of Israel?

Weiner: Where is the border – how – do you want me to describe it on a map?

Cohen: I don’t know, where is it?

Weiner: Mr. Moderator-of-this-Debate, how do you want me to do that?

Cohen: One border is the sea, where is the eastern border?

Weiner: The Jordan River.

Ah-ha! So there it is. Weiner doesn’t think that any “settlement activity” is taking place on Palestinian lands because he doesn’t think that Palestinian lands exist. He thinks that Israel sprawls from the Jordan River to the sea, which is in perfect accord with the views of Bibi Netanyahu, Ariel Sharon, and, well, far too many Israeli administrations, but just happens to contradict International law. In fact, the International Court of Justice has specifically found that Israel’s practice of building settlements — essentially, transferring large chunks of its civilian population into territory it occupies — is a breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Apparently, every government in the world, with the exception of Israel, agrees.

Lies 10, 11, and 12: Hamas started the Gaza Conflict by firing rockets into Israel; Israel merely carpet-bombed whole neighborhoods of Gaza in self-defense, a right which the Goldstone Report doesn’t recognize.

Weiner: Yes, it was terrible, it was a terrible, damaging war, but it was initiated by Hamas after 12000 rockets. It is a right of a people to defend themselves and you would not know that reading the Goldstone Report.

Here we have another doozy, a case of three lies in one. Happily for us, Jerome Slater has tackled all of them at one point or another in his many writings on the Gaza conflict and the Goldstone Report. Just read this and this. In particular, he has done a brilliant job of puncturing the self-defense claim, demonstrating how it is both factually and philosophically impossible. The fact part is simple: in the months preceding Operation Cast Lead, Israel and Hamas had a truce that Israel broke (on Nov. 4, 2008) in an attack that killed six men from Hamas; and when Hamas offered to renew the truce in exchange for Israel easing the siege, Israel demurred – and, several weeks later, launched Cast Lead. As to the philosophical argument, it boils down to this: “there can be no right of self-defense when illegitimate and violent repression engenders resistance—and that holds true even when the form of resistance, terrorism (a fair description of Hamas attacks on Israeli civilians) is itself morally wrong.”

As to Weiner’s claim that the Goldstone Report ignores Israel’s right to self-defense, well, anyone who’s read even a fraction of the document knows this isn’t the case. As Slater has written:

“First, while the report condemned the Israeli methods of warfare, it accepted that the purpose of Cast Lead was legitimate: Israel, it said, had a right to “defend itself” against Palestinian rocket and mortar attacks aimed at Israeli towns and villages. In his oped, Goldstone reiterated this argument: “I have always been clear that Israel, like any other sovereign nation, has the right and obligation to defend itself and its citizens against attacks from abroad and within.”

So there you have it. Anthony Weiner showed up to a packed hall in New York this past March and spewed at least twelve big, bogus claims about Israel, Palestine, and the Gaza Conflict. And he clearly hadn’t read the Goldstone Report. But if his brother and sister congresspeople get their way, he might soon have a lot of time on his hands. One way he could fill it? By cracking open the Goldstone Report.

Stepping in where the international community has failed: An interview with Frank Barat

Jun 10, 2011

Emanuel Stoakes

As the peace process remains at a standstill and Israel continues to expand settlements in the West Bank and deny basic Palestinian human rights with impunity, many people wonder – what hope is there for any kind of a “just” peace? One person in a unique position to answer this question is Frank Barat, a co-ordinator of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine. Modeled on the original Russell Tribunals, which were organized by Bertrand Russell and Jean Paul Sartre to investigate war crimes in Vietnam, the Russell Tribunal on Palestine is an international effort created “to promote and sustain a citizen’s initiative in support of the rights of the Palestinian people, with public international law as a legal frame of reference.”

I sat down with Barat to discuss the Russell Tribunal and the current state of affairs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:

Frank, you are known for your work with the Russell Tribunal on Palestine, can you tell us a bit about this group and what they do, what their aims are?

The Russell Tribunal on Palestine (RToP) is an International People’s Tribunal created following the international community’s inaction regarding Israel’s recognized violations of International law.

The RToP proceedings, which comprise a number of sessions, deal with different aspects of the complicity and responsibilities of States, international organisations and corporations in the on-going occupation of Palestinian territories by Israel and the perpetuation of the violations of international law committed by Israel. They also aim to highlight the continuity and comprehensiveness of the Israeli policy that aims ultimately to render impossible the establishment of a Palestinian state.

”The legality of the Russell Tribunal comes from both its absolute powerlessness and its universality”. The RToP has no legal status, and draws its strength from the will of citizens who wish to put an end to the impunity that Israel enjoys while denying the Palestinians their most basic rights. It does not compete with other jurisdictions (domestic or international), but works in complementarity with them to enforce the law in Palestine.

On 1 -3 March 2010, the first international session of the RToP was organized in Barcelona, to consider the complicities and responsibilities of the European Union and its Member States in the on-going occupation of Palestinian territories by Israel and the perpetuation of the violations of international law by Israel, with complete impunity.

The conclusions of this first session emphasize the shortcomings of the EU and its member states in implementing international law (promoting the right to self-determination, the obligation to respect and ensure respect for international humanitarian law, universal jurisdiction…) and European law (the Association Agreement, respect for the rule of origin, arms exports to Israel in contradiction with the European code of conduct, products exported from the settlements, settlements participation in European research programs…). They were sent to all the European heads of government and foreign affairs ministers, to the presidents of the European Union, Commission and Parliament, to the United Nations, Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab League.

The second international session of the RToP took place in London, on the 20, 21 and 22 November 2010. It examined International corporate complicity in Israel’s Violations of International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law.

The jury concluded that the concerned corporations are complicit in Israeli violations of international law – including war crimes. For this, corporations may be liable under civil or criminal law in domestic law courts, and Corporate actors may be liable under international criminal law and/or under domestic criminal law if they have taken decisions as a result of which corporations have become involved in assisting Israel’s violations of international law. States have an obligation to enforce existing law against corporations where they are acting in violation of international human rights and humanitarian law standards. The Tribunal also called upon individuals, groups and organizations to take all necessary measures to secure compliance of corporations with international human rights and humanitarian law standards.

The 3rd international Session of the RToP will take place in November 2011 in South Africa. It will deal with the applicability of the crime of apartheid to Israel in regards of its treatment of the Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinians Territories (OPT) and in Israel itself.

Egypt has declared that it has opened the Rafah crossing- a big move, likely to cause a strong reaction from within the Israeli political establishment- what do you think the implications of this will be for Gazans and Palestinians in general, and, moreover, can / will it stay open?

Egypt announced on 25 May that Rafah border will be permanently opened from Saturday 28 May, from 9am to 9pm, everyday expect Fridays and holidays.

Let’s not forget that restrictions will still apply. All women and children under the age of 18 will be allowed to leave as well as all men over 40. For men between 18 and 40, a VISA will be needed, granted from Ramallah. So far, there is not an Egyptian bureau in Ramallah, able to do this. [The Egyptian authorities have recently said that they intend to open one soon]

This is of course great news for the people of Gaza, some of them having been stuck in the Gaza Strip for decades with virtually no chance of ever leaving the small enclave. The opening of the border will definitely improve Gazans’ life. When you have been imprisoned in a cage for years, an opening, as small as it is, acts like a lifeline. The people of the Gaza Strip might feel a little bit more human, thanks to this. It is also important, in desperate situations not to feel abandoned, to feel like you have support from other people. The fact that the Egyptian uprising led to the opening of the Rafah border is fantastic news. The Palestinians living in Gaza knew for years that the Egyptian people were and are supportive of their plight. The problem was that under the rule of the western backed dictator Mubarak, any uprising [they were some, contrary to what the mainstream media wanted us to believe] were dealt with brutal force, imprisonment, torture and often killings. Now that Mubarak has gone, thanks to the amazing steadfastness of the Egyptian people, things are different.

In the grander scheme of things, the opening of the Rafah border is also a huge blow to Israeli hasbara [propaganda]. For years, Israel and its allies [the US, the EU….] were able to say that “even the Palestinian Arab Brothers agree with us and think it’s necessary to have the borders closed. It’s not only us. If you are angry at the blockade, why don’t you boycott Egypt?”

This is now over.

Now Israel is back against the wall and there is no exit. The illegal siege of Gaza [collective punishment, forbidden under International Law] has to end.

The opening of the Rafah crossing is great news but in terms of standard of living, it won’t change much. The people of the Gaza Strip will finally be able to have freedom of movement [an inalienable right under the UN charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights] but will still be lacking the resources and materials to live a normal life.

Will the border stay open? This will depend on the next government of Egypt but I assume that once opened it will be very difficult for any government to close it again.

What do you make of the reconciliation between Hamas and Fatah? Why do you think it has happened at this time? What do you think the consequences will be?

It’s obviously a very important step forward, but we’re not sure yet, what the agreement will really mean in practice. Most mainstream commentators have called this ‘the re-unification of the Palestinian People’, which is of course, media talk and wrong. The Palestinian people have always been united. Fatah and Hamas are political parties, a completely different entity to the Palestinian people; whether you live in Europe or in the Middle East, there is a huge gap between the people, and their leaders.

Coming back to what the agreement will mean on a day to day basis, we have not had the answer yet. It seems so far that not many things will change. The P.A will still deal with security [in collaboration with Israel] and with potential ‘negotiations’ and Salam Fayyad could remain PM. Not much of a change for the people of the West Bank then.

We have to wait for a unity government to be formed, a political program to be put together, to really know what this agreement means.

So far, it’s an announcement. Not much more.

The fact that is happened now is very relevant and easy to understand. The PA has lost any credibility it had left after the Palestine Papers [a series of leaked documents detailing past negotiations between the PA and Israel amongst other matters], Hamas is seen more and more as a repressive entity in the Gaza Strip, there is the prospect of the unilateral declaration at the UN in September and the ‘Arab Spring’ meant that both the PA and Hamas knew they had to do something quick, or face an internal uprising.

As for the consequences in the international community, nothing happened that was not expected. Israel condemned the move and said that it won’t deal with Hamas [even if they have secretly dealt with the party for years regarding Gilad Shalit, a kidnapped Israeli soldier], the U.S as usual, is following the Israeli line, and the EU issues statements that lack substance and mean very little politically.

Let’s hope, that the “Arab Spring” has meant that those actors [aka imperial powers] will have less and less relevance in Palestinians internal affairs.

Do you think that anti-Semitism either within the Arab world or within the Pro-Palestinian Left is under-addressed? Certain statements in the Hamas charter are a case in point- added to other occasional statements made by anti-Zionists that get publicly exposed. Many Jewish friends of mine seem to feel racism of this sort can infect political movements, especially the anti-Zionist movement; do you think this an accurate viewpoint?

There is anti-Semitism in the world, yes. Like there is racism in the world. It’s a sad reality. Most of the time it comes from a lack of education. Most racists do not like “the other” because they do not know “the other”. The same applies to Palestine-Israel. The Israeli government is making it harder and harder for Palestinians and Israelis to meet, and then, via the media, the education system…creates a very distorted picture of the Palestinians and the Arabs in general. Which makes it very difficult for a young Israeli to feel anything else than hatred towards them.

The same applies to some part of Palestinian society.

Still, it is important to make the difference between a Jew and a Zionist. Not all Jews are Zionists, far from it, and some of the most ardent Zionists are in fact, Christians. (The Christian Zionist movement in the US is huge).

The Palestinians will go to the UN in September; it seems very likely, to ask for recognition of their state. The US is considered almost certain to block this. Where will that leave the Palestinian cause?

This is not a done deal. Mahmoud Abbas said yesterday that they will go to the U.N, if they cannot find an agreement to go back to the negotiating table. I think that the P.A knows that at the end of the day, they need negotiations more than a declaration of independence for their own survival.

The talked about UN declaration of a State, is a very dodgy concept under international law. Let’s remember that in 1988, Arafat already declared a State and nothing changed.

Another question is: What do the Palestinian need? A virtual State or freedom and an end to the occupation?

The argument put forward by the PA is that if the General Assembly votes for [it will], Israel will have to face international law and will be in a very tricky position. This argument is very weak. Syria and Lebanon are members of the UN, and have been for years. Has Israel stopped occupying parts of their land? Stopped bombing them? Started respecting International Law?

Of course not.

Also, the President of UN GA, Joseph Deiss, declared on Saturday 28 May that ‘US Veto would block a vote on Palestinian Statehood’ and that no State could become member of UN without recommendation from UN SC. Which in fact means that Mahmoud Abbas’ plan is now null. The US will definitely vote against as will probably do a few European countries [Obama has very openly said that he asked his European partners not to recognise the Palestinian State in September. And when a master gives orders….]. End of story then. Recognition by most members of UN GA will therefore be a strictly symbolic one. Is that really what the Palestinians need?

Israel does not care about International Law, and it won’t change if the GA recognises the Palestinian State. As long as the US keeps vetoing anything when it comes to Israel, Israel is fine.

The Palestinian cause will be left where it is now. A quite interesting place in fact. With the uprising in the Arab world, the people are slowly regaining power. Palestinian civil society, is slowly taking charge, regardless of what the politicians say. With the BDS movement growing faster and faster, and peaceful resistance spreading, one has to remain optimistic about the Palestinian cause.

Is the next assault on the Palestinians or an Intifada against Israel, inevitable?

The assault on the Palestinians, by Israel, has never stopped. People are being injured and killed on a weekly basis in Gaza. Fishermen are fired upon on a daily basis as are people cultivating their land. The assault is non-stop. In the West Bank, daily incursions by the Israeli Army, kidnapping, beatings…are also a daily occurrence. Inside Israel, more and more Palestinians are also been arrested, sent to jail, and never charged with anything.

If you’re talking about a large scale assault [i.e. Operation Cast Lead]. Yes, it is inevitable. Israel thrives on war, is addicted to it.

Can you comment on the impact of the sanctions on Gaza by the Israeli state on the civilian population- what do you think its aims are, whether they are likely to succeed, and the effect on the life of ordinary Gazans?

Like all sanctions [i.e. the example of Iraq pre-the second gulf war] the Israeli blockade [backed by the US and the EU] on Gaza has had a terrible effect on the civilian population.

Huge rise in prices, impossibility to rebuild after ‘Operation Cast Lead’, 80% of the water being undrinkable due to lack of material, 80% of people depending on aid to survive, and most people living under the poverty line. Most reports [from Amnesty international, Medical Aid for Palestinians, Human Rights Watch, The ICRC, Christian Aid, PCHR, PHR Israel] are pretty terrifying.

The psychological impact of the sanctions and a people living under a constant state of fear has also been terrible. The population in Gaza is demographically one of the youngest on the planet. Nearly 55% of the people are under 18. Recent surveys conducted by The Lancet and other organisations have found out that 70% of the youth was depressed and had lost the will to live.

Success depends on what they was their goal in the first place. The official goal was to “destabilise Hamas”. This has not worked.

The real goal was to “put the Palestinians on a diet, to starve them slowly”. If the blockade continues for much longer, this is likely to succeed.

Let’s reframe this a bit. We are talking of a people living under occupation, in something that is worse than a prison [prisoners have rights, even in jail], we’re talking about a population essentially made of refugees. This people, is being subjected to a crippling siege by its occupier, with the acquiescence of the International Community. Have you ever heard of something like this happening before?

Returning to current affairs, what do you make of Obama’s endorsement of a two-state solution on the June 1967 borders? Do you believe that he is sincere, and do you think he will succeed in getting this to happen?

Firstly, let’s remember that what Obama gave is called a speech. It’s a speech, and only that. We should stop relying on what politicians say. We should judge them on their actions. Words are useless.

Even more when they come from the mouth of a politician that has started his re-election campaign.

Secondly, the important speech Obama gave was in front of AIPAC. Not the one he gave a few days prior to this.

Thirdly, Obama never said he endorsed a two state solution on the June 1967 borders. Quite the opposite actually. It’s called double speak. The mainstream media simply repeated Obama’ words, and it made the headlines. Obama said that the future Palestinian borders will be based on the June 1967 borders, with huge land swaps. Which in real talk means “the future Palestinian borders won’t be based on the 1967 line” [which should be called 1949 armistice line].

It is crucial to remember that in fact that Palestinian State has to be based on 1949 armistice line is not debatable. The UN Charter forbids the acquisition of territory through war. If the US and Israel disagree with this, they should leave the UN, or be kicked out of it.

So yes, I believe he is sincere at that his vision of a Bantustan-filled Palestinian State is a possibility and should not be discounted. I also believe that this won’t happen, thanks to Palestinian resistance, steadfastness and the support from the people, all around the world.

What do think of Netanyahu’s speech to congress recently, and the reaction to it by the American politicians in attendance (standing ovations, applause, etc.)?

Once again, this is nothing new. ¾ of the members of congress were at the AIPAC annual conference and support Israel regardless of what the State does.

Netanyahu really spoke in front of his congress. He got more standing ovations than Obama received during his State of the Union address.

What is scary is that Netanyahu’s speech was in fact the end of any possibility of negotiations and future peace deals. (no to 67 borders, no to refugees, no to Jerusalem as shared capital..) Some Palestinians rightly called it “a declaration of war”. The fact that congress raised in fawning unison hearing that is very worrying.

On the other hand, Mark Twain once called member of congress “the smallest minds and the selfishest souls and the cowardliest hearts that God makes”. So….

If, hypothetically, the Palestinians agreed to all of Netanyahu’s demands, what do you think the result would be for them?

The Palestine Papers revealed that the Palestinians negotiators were pretty close to agreeing to every single Israeli demands…and more.

What did Barak, Olmert, Livni did?….They asked for more and more and more. This will never stop, and that is why, in my opinion, negotiations are useless.

One of the weakest [politically] occupied people in history cannot negotiate with a most powerful occupier. It does not make sense. There is always going to be one loser. It’s a reality.

It is even harder to negotiate with a government that repeatedly said that “you were not a people”, “you did not exist” and that in fact, want ‘Eretz Israel’, the Zionist dream, a state from the Mediterranean to the Jordan river.

If the Palestinians were to agree to Netanyahu’s demands, they’ll end up either in Jordan or Egypt. Period.

What do you make of Hamas’ mourning for Osama Bin Laden, their targeting of Israeli civilians (including children- thrown into stark relief recently by the killing of children on a schoolbus), their alleged torture of Palestinian political opponents in the light of human rights values that are held up by Western activists? Surely Hamas have committed indefensible acts, and should be the subject of moral scrutiny as much as Israel?

Yes, Hamas should be the subject of moral scrutiny as much as Israel….once Palestine is liberated. Hamas has committed, and still commits reprehensible acts, but Hamas has never been given the chance to properly govern. Once Palestine is liberated, then, yes, Hamas and Fatah will need to answer serious questions. Till then, I refuse to ‘judge’ a party that is also, as are its people, under occupation.

It is a lot more important to scrutinise the actions of country that calls itself “the only democracy in the Middle East” and its allies that while they value human rights in words, do completely the opposite in their actions (Coalition invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan, drones bombing in Pakistan, extra judicial killings all over the world, supporting dictators in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia….)

Does the IDF torture minors?

Yes they do and the mainstream media never talks about this, although it is well documented. More than 700 children are arrested or kidnapped by Israel each year and end up being subjected to torture in Israel jails.

The list of examples is too long so I’ll simply direct you to Defence for Children International reports.

On a personal level, have you been to the Occupied territories & Gaza? And if so, what was the overall impression that you took from visiting there?

I have regularly travelled to the West Bank in the last few years but never had the chance to visit the Gaza Strip. I know that it will eventually happen.

What I found, each time I visited, was that the Palestinian people were the kindest, friendly, most politically aware and most resolute and steadfast people I had ever met. I look forward to each visit immensely and often feel more at home in Palestine than in Europe.

This is what keeps me and thousands of internationals around the world, going.

Deep down, we know that those amazing people will one day have freedom. Helping them achieve this is a moral duty, an obligation, for anyone that cares about justice, human rights and wants to work for a world based on more humane values.

What do you think of the legitimacy of the Palestinian Authority- given that they have been accused of complicity in the oppression of Palestinians by some commentators?

The P.A is a creation of the Oslo accords and its mandate ended in 1999. The question of legitimacy therefore needs to be addressed. In 2006, Hamas won the legislative elections with a big margin, which again, raise the question of the P.A legitimacy nowadays.

On the ground, the P.A and its security apparatus are more and more seen as the proxy of the Israeli Army. The street of Nablus, Jenin…are now patrolled by P.A forces and people are stopped at road blocks, not by the Israeli Army, but by their own security forces. Which really makes for an Orwellian situation. The P.A has also helped Israel in arresting and imprisoning members of Hamas in the West Bank.

But really, this is all part of the Oslo accords, which, as Edward Said put it, were created to make this occupation less costly and easier to run for Israel, an occupation by proxy, where the Palestinians do the job of Israel.

Do you unequivocally condemn Palestinian attacks on innocent civilians? Can acts of violence against children or civilians ever be justified if we are to criticize the same actions when they are committed by Israel?

Of course. Any acts of violence that targets civilians should be condemned, whoever commits it.

In your forthcoming book, “Corporate Complicity in Israel’s Occupation” one assumes that you are to critique corporate “sponsorship” for want of a better word, of Israeli occupation. How deep does this relationship go, and how complicit are UK businesses (including arms companies), and perhaps more invidiously, the UK government in the unlawful actions of the occupation?

For more information about this, I will advise people to visit the Russell Tribunal on Palestine website and to buy the book when it comes out in October.

A project called “Who profits?”  ran by some extraordinary Israeli and Palestinian women is collecting information on all corporations involved in the occupation. People should check out their website for more information.

There are those that hold that the settlements are not illegal under international law as the West Bank was claimed in a defensive operation and are negotiated territory. What is your response?

I have never heard such a statement. International Law is what it is, and it applies to all countries. There is no International Law for Israel and International Law for everyone else. The same Laws apply to everyone.

Under International Law, the settlements, that in fact should be called colonies, are illegal. Period.

The United Nations Security Council recently voted, affirmatively, on a resolution (vetoed only by the USA) saying so.

There is no debate about this.

Frank Barat is a Human Rights activist based in the UK. He is the coordinator of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine, and the views expressed in this interview are solely his.. He has edited 2 books, “Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on Israel’s War Against the Palestinians”, by Noam Chomsky and Ilan Pappe (out now) and “Corporate Complicity in Israel’s Occupation” with Asa Winstanley (out in October).

Emanuel Stoakes is a British writer and independent journalist based in New Zealand, he has interviewed a number of key Palestinian activists and hosts a blog at:

If you were 12 years old and they were ethnically cleansing your neighborhood– well, you’d stop being a child too

Jun 10, 2011

Philip Weiss

Where is the American press? Unbelievable video from The Guardian, and B’Tselem, shot by beautiful Palestinian twins of 12, showing the ethnic cleansing of their neighborhood in East Jerusalem. Every home taken over by settlers. “Enter any home in Sheikh Jarrah and you will find a sad story,” says young Muhammed with precocious wisdom. Why are Palestinian children of 12 years old so politicized? Because they have to be. Because American Zionist Jews have licensed this segregation and dispossession. Because Obama has signed off on this. Because American tourists show up and an out of control woman cries “You’re a murderer” at the child photographer. Why isn’t this in the American press? Why is even Lesley Stahl’s 60 Minutes piece on Silwan, rebroadcast the other day, situated inside the Israeli narrative (albeit showing it to be crazy)?

Imagine Wasserman Schultz talking about the ‘demographic’ threat to Arizona

Jun 10, 2011


Anthony Weiner is hardly alone in reconciling extreme positions on Israel and Palestine with domestic American progressivism. There’s Debbie Wasserman Schultz, head of the DNC, whose concerns re a demographic threat to Israel we picked up yesterday. Writes a friend:

Such a split personality. The repression which she thinks healthy and necessary when exercised against Palestinians she would denounce if applied to any other people in any other part of the world. Compare her statement (1) below and the slightly altered version (2).

(1) “Now more than ever, Israel needs America’s unwavering support as it faces an unavoidable demographic reality. Between the rapidly growing Palestinian population, the uncertainty of the changes sweeping the Middle East and North Africa, and the intention of the Palestinians to unilaterally declare a Palestinian state at the United Nations this fall with international pressure to validate this unacceptable action, this is a watershed moment for Israel.”

(2) “Now more than ever, Arizona needs America’s unwavering support as it faces an unavoidable demographic reality. Between the rapidly growing Mexican population, the uncertainty of the changes sweeping the entire United States, and the intention of old legal immigrants as well as new illegal immigrants to unilaterally claim their rights by using their numbers as a wedge in American politics in the coming elections, this is a watershed moment for the loyalty of all native Americans.”

Posted in Middle EastComments Off on Mondoweiss Online Newsletter

Israeli shares her nabi saleh experience


Dear friends and family


My first taste of ‘fire’ today, 10 June 2011, in solidarity with the pastoral Palestinian village of Nebi Saleh. Like everyone else, first-timers and seasoned demonstrators, I was shocked at the violence used by the soldiers against non-violent protesters – men, women and children, Palestinians, Israelis, and foreigners alike!

I can confirm that there was absolutely no provocation on the part of the demonstrators. We’d hardly taken our first steps through this sleepy village when tear gas canisters started falling all around us, the air became filled with the acrid smoke, and our eyes, mouths and skin took the impact of the tear gas.

Is this not chemical warfare? Personally, I can’t think of any other description that fits. No matter what you call it, it is being used in the most vengeful way imaginable against an innocent, civilian population who want nothing other than to legitimately walk down to their spring of water without harassment by the settlers who have built a village on their land (the red-roofed settlement of Halamish) or the soldiers who use sophisticated chemical weaponry to prevent them from even walking down the road in their own village.

Aside from the tear gas and rubber bullets, there’s also – by way of a grande finale – the notorious ‘skunk’ which is driven through the village spraying homes and people with a putrid, sticky chemical concoction, the ingredients of which are a mystery. Fortunately, I didn’t get to smell it at close range. It was bad enough to get a whiff of it from afar as our group, like the sheep ahead of us, eventually turned tail, and made our way back across country to our cars, leaving Nebi Saleh’s brave inhabitants behind us.

Next Friday, they will once again find themselves in a “closed military zone” face-to-face with a force that with impunity douses them, their children, their homes and village with chemicals and sows confusion and chaos. As we seem to be unable to stop the establishment’s terrible tactics, I think the very least we can do is be there with the Tamimi clan in Nebi Saleh. It’s scary, I know. But if you live in Israel, you should at least experience it once. That way you will know and never forget.

Whether you live here or not,  I beg you to forward this email to everyone you know. This is not quite the democracy we claim for ourselves…

I have published an album and a note on Facebook – please visit and like and/or share, or not.

If you don’t use Facebook, you can view the album in my personal web gallery at

The young girl wearing the black and white keffiyeh-patterned dress and scarf is the 10 year-old daughter of Bassem Tamimi, peace activist and Nabi Saleh’s non-violent popular struggle coordinator. She looked so sad as she told how she hasn’t seen her father for a couple of months. He’s been in custody since late March. Tamimi wrote an incredibly compelling statement for his trial, but was not allowed to read the full version in the military court. Fortunately, it has made its way on to the internet. You can find it at



PS  For a video of what it’s like – albeit on a calmer day in early May, when demonstrators managed to make some progress down the road, see the video which freelance journalist Joseph Dana published at

I met Joseph yesterday, and without guidance from him and other veterans, I would no doubt have rubbed my eyes, had a drink of water or panicked and done myself an injury.

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Israeli shares her nabi saleh experience

Bilderberg, Kissinger and ‘Jewish hatred’



by rehmat1


The Israel lobbying group, Anti-Defamation League (ADL), defines Bilderberg as “a legitimate business entity with ties to Europe and America”. It also raises the hoax of ‘Jewish hatred’ against people who consider Biderberg as world’s most powerful economical and political secret society.

“Various far-right extremists and conspiracy theorists, however, charge that the group is a shadowy force seeking to control world events, exerting allegedly dominating powers of international influence to promote a “new world order” under their control. The extremists claim that Presidential candidates of both major U.S. political parties are controlled by the Bilderberg group; among those often mentioned in such conspiracy-oriented propaganda are David Rockefeller, the Clintons and Henry Kissinger,” says ADL official website.

Rev. Ted Pike has called ADL Global Thought Police.

In addition to Henery Kissinger, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Stephen Harper, Bill Clinton, Gordon Brown, Angela Markel, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, Larry Summers, Tim Geithner, Lloyd Blankfein, George Soros, Donald Rumsfeld, Rupert Murdoch, Marie-Josee Kravis (fellow at Neocon Hudson Institute), Jessica T. Matthews (President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a neocon think tank), Moisés Naim (Editor-in-Chief, Foreign Policy, a neocon propaganda outlet), Queen Beatrix of Netherlands (a bigot who had claimed that “religion of Islam is against humanity”), Richard Holbrooke (Obama’s late Jewish special envoy to Pakistan-Afghanistan), Richard N. Perle (Israel-Firster and Fellow at AEI Jewish think tank), Robert E. Rubin (Co-Chairman, CFR, the powerful Jewish think tank), Eric Schmidt (CEO and Chairman of the Board, Google), Queen Sofia of Spain, Peter D. Sutherland (Chairman, Goldman Sachs International), José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero (Prime Minister of Spain), etc.

Recently, Dominique Baetting, member of Switzerland’s largest political party, Swiss People’s Party, wrote a letter to the General Prosecutor of the Swiss Federation, demanding the arrest of Zionist Jewish war criminal, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, if he attends the 2011 Bilderberg conference of global power brokers which is set to begin on June 9, 2011 at the Hotel Suvretta House in St. Moritz.

Baettig’s letter also calls for the apprehension of George W. Bush and French Crypto-Jewish President Nicolas Sarkozy, but neither are likely to be attending the conference. However, Henry Kissinger is a regular Bilderberg attendee and is almost certain to be present in St. Moritz.

Kissinger, National Security Advisor and later Secretary of State for President Nixon and President Ford, has been accused of being complicit in a number of war crimes in Indochina, Bangladesh, Chile, Cyprus and East Timor. Numerous activists have attempted to arrest him over the years under the Geneva Conventions Act.

In The Trial of Henry Kissinger, ‘Islamophobe’ writer Christopher Hitchens documents how Henry Kissinger personally approved bombing campaigns that resulted in thousands of civilian casualties as well as signing off on the use of the deadly chemical Agent Orange. United States General Telford Taylor, the former chief prosecuting officer at the Nuremberg trials, stated that Kissinger committed war crimes by giving the nod to bomb Vietnamese villages during the war.

If ADL is telling the truth about Bilderberg as a legitimate business entity – then question arises, why the group, like Holocaust Industry, needs government protection?

Stephen Lendman exposes The True Story of Bilderberg Group the best.

“Bilderbergers want to supplant individual nation-state sovereignty with an all-powerful global government, corporate controlled, and check-mated by militarized enforcement”.

“Imagine a private club where presidents, prime ministers, international bankers and generals rub shoulders, where gracious royal chaperones ensure everyone gets along, and where the people running the wars, markets, and Europe (andAmerica) say what they never dare say in public.”

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Bilderberg, Kissinger and ‘Jewish hatred’

Tawakkol Karman – Yemen’s woman revolutionary


by rehmat1


Tawakkol Karman 32, is a Yemeni woman journalist and chairperson of Women Journalists Without Chains (WJWC). She is one of the leaders of the mass anti-government movement in Yemen. She has been ignored by the so-called ‘civilized West’press because she is ‘different’ from the western brainwashed apologetic Zionist Western media ‘darlings’ like Irshad Manji, the Canadian lesbian Muslim reformer or former Dutch MP Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somalia-born anti-Islam neocon.

Tawakkol Karman is proud of her faith, wears Hijab and hates to be an apologetic Muslimah. Could she be another ’Islamist’ like Safynaz Kazen, the Egyptian Muslim journalist or Professor Zahra Rahnavard, wife of Mir Hossein Mousavi, who lost to Dr. Ahmadinejad in June 2009 election or  Zainab Al-Ghazali, the Egyptian women’s right activist? Only future will tell. Tawakkol Karman, mother of three, was warned by President Ali Abdullah Saleh (now living in exile in Saudi Arabia) through her brother that if she doesn’t control herself, she will be killed.

Tawakkol Karman, in her column published in British daily Guardian (April 8, 2011) wrote:” We are in the first stage of change in our country, and the feeling among the revolutionaries is that the people of Yemen will find solutions for our problems once the regime has gone, because the regime itself is the cause of most of them. A new Yemen awaits us, with a better future for all. We are not blind to reality, but the fact is that the revolution has created social tranquillity across the country as the people put their differences to one side and tackle the main issue together – no mean feat, given that there are an estimated 70m weapons in Yemen (21 million Yemenis on an average own three guns per person)”.

However, she also showed her lack of world politics and the Judeo-Christian agenda against Muslim world. She appealed to the two anti-Muslim colonial powers, the US and EU, for help.

“I call on the United States and the European Union to tell Saleh that he must leave now, in response to the demands of his people. They should end all support for his regime, especially that which is used to crush peaceful opposition  – tear gas canisters have “Made in America” on them. They should freeze the Saleh family’s assets and those of Saleh’s henchmen and return them to the people,” she wrote.

Both the US and Israel may be forced to accept a new regime in Yemen – but like in Tunisia and Egypt – they would like the new regime to be a continuation of Saleh’s submission to US-Israel. Israel-Firster Sen. Joe Lieberman had made that clear last year.

Washington, on behlaf of Israel, have been creating fear of Tehran among its neighboring countries since the collapse of USSR influence in the region in 1990. Yemen’s Bab el-Mandab site, is very important strategically to Israel, China and Iran. The site, between Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea connects the Red Sea with Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea. Oil and other exports from the Persian Gulf must pass through Bab el-Mandab before entering the Suez Canal. A very good reason for US/NATO to petrol the waters and control oil supply to China and protect Israel from its hostile neighbors.

Posted in YemenComments Off on Tawakkol Karman – Yemen’s woman revolutionary

Pope appoints IsraHelli Zionist to Vatican’s highest court


by rehmat1

Once again, Pope Benedict XVI has proved his loyalty to Zionism. He has installed David Maria Jaeger 56, an Israel-born  Zionist Jew converted to Catholism, as a prelate auditor of the Roman Rota, a papal law court that serves as the chief appellate court of the Catholic Church.

“Jaeger’s appointment to the Holy See’s highest judicial body – comprising 20 auditors hand-picked by the pope and headed by Dean of the Rota Antoni Stankiewicz – is considered a personal sign of appreciation by the pope for Jaeger’s years as legal adviser to the delegation that negotiated the Vatican’s Fundamental Agreement with Israel. This pact, signed in 1993, enabled the establishment of diplomatic relations between the parties the following year,” reported by Israel’s daily Ha’aretz, June 3, 2011.

When Jaeger was asked yesterday whether he feels Israeli, he replied: “I’m a loyal and patriotic son of our people and our country. After all, that was the whole point of the Jewish people’s emancipation in the 19th century, that we would become a nation, not a religious minority among gentiles. A person can live according to his conscience, he can not believe in any religious faith or believe in one rather than another, all according to his own intellectual conscience”.

Interestingly, Jaeger will be presiding over the highest Catholic court in Vatican city where on the conclusion of 2010 Synod of Bishops, Greek-Melchite Archbishop Cyrille Salim Bustros had proclaimed: “We Christians cannot speak about the promised land for the Jewish people. There is no longer a chosen people. All men and women of all countries have become the chosen people. The concept of the promised land cannot be used as a base for the justification of the return of Jews to Israel and the displacement of Palestinians. The justification of Israel’s occupation of the land of Palestine cannot be based on sacred scriptures”.

In 2006, American Catholic writer and women’s right activist, Joanna Francis, posted on her blog, Benedict XVI: Zionist Double Agent, saying: “It should be obvious to everyone now, that we Catholics who have figured out that the Vatican is under Zionist control, have been right all along. They labeled us “extremists,” “sedevacantists,” “ultra right-wingers,” “fascists,” “Nazis,” etc. But when the Jews and their useful idiots have to resort to hurling those epithets at you, it usually means you’ve hit upon the truth. Well, we Catholic “extremists” have the Zionists’ number and we have been calling them on it for a long time. Now, maybe the rest of the brainwashed Christians will wake up.

It’s really not difficult to understand why Benedict XVI is encouraging emnity between the Catholics and the Muslims. All you have to ask is: cui bono? (who benefits?). The Zionists, of course. The Catholic Church was always their biggest enemy. So naturally the Jews were going to do anything and everything to get it under their control. It took almost 2,000 years, but it finally happened in 1958. The Jews pulled off a coup d’eglise with the election of Freemason Angelo Roncalli (John XXIII) to the Papacy. Immediately upon his election, the media began calling Roncalli ”Good Pope John.” Be careful when the Jewish controlled media praises someone, especially a Catholic, that means that person is working for them. Contrast the media’s love affair with the post-1958 popes with their hatred of all pre-1958 popes, up to and including Pius XII (who died in 1958). They accuse Pope Pius XII of having been a Nazi, which really means that Pius XII actually thought he was the Pope of the Catholic people and did not realize that he was supposed to be working for the Jews! I have figured out that whoever the Jews hate, you can bet your bottom dollar, that person knows the truth about the Jewish agenda. The converse is also true: whoever the Jews love, that person is a traitor to the Christian people and is really a Zionist tool….”

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Pope appoints IsraHelli Zionist to Vatican’s highest court

The Elite, the ‘Great Game’ and World War III


By Prof. Mujahid Kamran

Global Research

New Dawn Special Issue 16

The control of the US, and of global politics, by the wealthiest families of the planet is exercised in a powerful, profound and clandestine manner. This control began in Europe and has a continuity that can be traced back to the time when the bankers discovered it was more profitable to give loans to governments than to needy individuals.

These banking families and their subservient beneficiaries have come to own most major businesses over the two centuries during which they have secretly and increasingly organised themselves as controllers of governments worldwide and as arbiters of war and peace.

Unless we understand this we will be unable to understand the real reasons for the two world wars and the impending Third World War, a war that is almost certain to begin as a consequence of the US attempt to seize and control Central Asia. The only way out is for the US to back off – something the
people of the US and the world want, but the elite does not.

The US is a country controlled through the privately owned Federal Reserve, which in turn is controlled by the handful of banking families that established it by deception in the first place.

In his interesting book The Secret Team, Col. Fletcher Prouty, briefing officer of the US President from 1955-63, narrates a remarkable incident in which Winston Churchill made a most revealing utterance during World War II: “On this particular night there had been a heavy raid on Rotterdam. He sat there, meditating, and then, as if to himself, he said, ‘Unrestricted submarine warfare, unrestricted air bombing – this is total war.’ He continued sitting there, gazing at a large map, and then said, ‘Time and the Ocean and some guiding star and High Cabal have made us what we are’.”

Prouty further states: “This was a most memorable scene and a revelation of reality that is infrequent, at best. If for the great Winston Churchill, there is a ‘High Cabal’ that has made us what we are, our definition is complete. Who could know better than Churchill himself during the darkest days of World War II, that there exists, beyond doubt, an international High Cabal? This was true then. It is true today, especially in these times of the One World Order. This all-powerful group has remained superior because it had learned the value of anonymity.” This “High Cabal” is the “One World Cabal” of today, also called the elite by various writers.

The High Cabal and What They Control

The elite owns the media, banks, defence and oil industry. In his book Who’s Who of the Elite Robert Gaylon Ross Sr. states: “It is my opinion that they own the US military, NATO, the Secret Service, the CIA, the Supreme Court, and many of the lower courts. They appear to control, either directly or indirectly, most of the state, county, and local law enforcement agencies.”

The elite is intent on conquering the world through the use of the abilities of the people of the United States. It was as far back as 1774 that Amschel Mayer Rothschild stated at a gathering of the twelve richest men of Prussia in Frankfurt: “Wars should be directed so that the nations on both sides should be further in our debt.” He further enunciated at the same meeting: “Panics and financial depressions would ultimately result in World Government, a new order of one world government.”

The elite owns numerous “think tanks” that work for expanding, consolidating and perpetuating its hold on the globe. The Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and many other similar organisations are all funded by the elite and work for it. These think tanks publish journals, such as Foreign Affairs, in which these imperialist and anti-mankind ideas are edified as publications, and then, if need be, expanded in the form of books that are given wide publicity.

Zbigniew Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger et al, as well as the neo-con “thinkers,” owe their positions and good living standards to the largesse of the elite. This is an important point that must be kept in full view at all times. These thinkers and writers are on the payroll of the elite and work for them. In case someone has any doubts about such a statement, it might help to read the following quotes from Professor Peter Dale Scott’s comprehensively researched book The Road to 9/11 – Wealth, Empire, and the Future of America (University of California Press, 2007):

…Bundy’s Harvard protégé Kissinger was named to be national security adviser after having chaired an important “study group” at the Council on Foreign Relations. As a former assistant to Nelson Rockefeller, Kissinger had been paid by Rockefeller to write a book on limited warfare for the CFR. He had also campaigned hard in Rockefeller’s losing campaign for the Presidential nomination in 1968. Thus Rockefeller and the CFR might have been excluded from control of the Republican Party, but not from the Republican White House. (Page 22)

The following quote from page 38 of the book is also very revealing:

The Kissinger-Rockefeller relationship was complex and certainly intense. As investigative reporter Jim Hougan wrote: “Kissinger, married to a former Rockefeller aide, owner of a Georgetown mansion whose purchase was enabled only by Rockefeller gifts and loans, was always a protégé of his patron Nelson Rockefeller, even when he wasn’t directly employed by him.”

Professor Scott adds:

Nixon’s and Kissinger’s arrival in the White House in 1969 coincided with David Rockefeller’s becoming CEO of Chase Manhattan Bank. The Nixon-Kissinger foreign policy of detente was highly congruous with Rockefeller’s push to internationalise Chase Manhattan banking operations. Thus in 1973 Chase Manhattan became the first American bank to open an office in Moscow. A few months later, thanks to an invitation arranged by Kissinger, Rockefeller became the first US banker to talk with Chinese Communist leaders in Beijing.

How They Manipulate Public Opinion

In addition to these strategic “think tanks” the elite has set up a chain of research institutes devoted to manipulating public opinion in a manner the elite desires. As pointed out by John Coleman in his eye opening book The Tavistock Institute on Human Relations – Shaping the Moral, Spiritual, Cultural, Political and Economic Decline of the United States of America, it was in 1913 that an institute was established at Wellington House, London for manipulation of public opinion. According to Coleman:

The modern science of mass manipulation was born at Wellington House London, the lusty infant being midwifed by Lord Northcliffe and Lord Rothmere. The British monarchy, Lord Rothschild, and the Rockefellers were responsible for funding the venture… the purpose of those at Wellington House was to effect a change in the opinions of British people who were adamantly opposed to war with Germany, a formidable task that was accomplished by “opinion making” through polling. The staff consisted of Arnold Toynbee, a future director of studies at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), Lord Northcliffe, and the Americans, Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays. Lord Northcliffe was related to the Rothschilds through marriage.

Bernays was a nephew of Sigmund Freud, a fact never mentioned, and developed the technique of “engineering consent.” When Sigmund Freud moved to Britain he also, secretly, became associated with this institute through the Tavistock Institute. According to Coleman, Bernays “pioneered the use of psychology and other social sciences to shape and form public opinion so that the public thought such manufactured opinions were their own.”

The Tavistock Institute has a 6 billion dollar fund and 400 subsidiary organisations are under its control along with 3,000 think tanks, mostly in the USA. The Stanford Research Institute, the Hoover Institute, the Aspen Institute of Colorado, and many others, devoted to manipulation of US as well as global public opinion, are Tavistock offshoots. This helps explain why the US public, by and large, is so mesmerised as to be unable to see things clearly and to react.

Bilderberg researcher Daniel Estulin quotes from Mary Scobey’s book To Nurture Humanness a statement attributed to Professor Raymond Houghton, that the CFR has been clear for a very long time that “absolute behaviour control is imminent… without mankind’s self realisation that a crisis is at hand.”

Also keep in mind that currently 80% of US electronic and print media is owned by only six large corporations. This development has taken place in the past two decades. These corporations are elite owned. It is almost impossible for anyone who is acquainted with what is going on at the global level to watch, even for a few minutes, the distortions, lies and fabrications, incessantly pouring out of this media, a propaganda and brainwashing organ of the elite.

Once your picture is clear it is also easy to notice the criminal silence of the media on crimes being perpetrated against humanity at the behest of the elite. How many people know that the cancer rates in Fallujah, Iraq are higherthan those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of the use of depleted uranium, and maybe other secret nuclear devices, by US forces? Fallujah was punished for its heroic resistance against the American forces.

The Importance of Eurasia

Why is the US in Central Asia? In order to understand this, one has to look at the writings of the stooges of the elite – Brzezinski, Kissinger, Samuel P Huntington, and their likes. It is important to note that members of these elite paid think tanks publish books as part of a strategy to give respectability to subsequent illegal, immoral and predatory actions that are to be taken at the behest of the elite. The views are not necessarily their own – they are the views of the think tanks. These stooges formulate and pronounce policies and plans at the behest of their masters, through bodies like the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, etc.

In his infinitely arrogant book The Grand Chessboard, published in 1997, Brzezinski spelled out the philosophy behind the current US military eruption. He starts by quoting the well-known views of the British geographer Sir Halford J Mackinder (1861–1947), another worker for the elite. Mackinder was a member of the ‘Coefficients Dining Club’ established by members of the Fabian Society in 1902. The continuity of the policies of the elite is indicated by the fact Brzezinski starts from Mackinder’s thesis first propounded in 1904: “Who rules East Europe commands the Heartland: Who rules the Heartland commands the World-Island: who commands the World-Island commands the world.”

Brzezinski argues that for the first time in human history a non-Eurasian power has become preeminent and it must hold sway over the Eurasian continent if it is to remain the preeminent global power: “For America the chief geopolitical prize is Eurasia… About 75 percent of the world’s people live in Eurasia… Eurasia accounts for about 60 percent of the world’s GNP and about three fourths of the world’s known energy resources.”

It is not just the geostrategic location of this region – it is also its wealth, “both in its enterprises and beneath its soil,” that holds such attraction for the elite whose greed for money, and lust for power, remain insatiable, as if there was a sickness afflicting it.

Brzezinski writes: “But it is on the globe’s most important playing field – Eurasia – that a potential rival to America might at some point arise. This focusing on the key players and properly assessing the terrain has to be a point of departure for the formulation of American geostrategy for the long-term management of America’s Eurasian geopolitical interests.”

These lines were published in 1997. Millions of people have died in the past two decades and millions have been rendered homeless in this region but it remains a “playing” field for Brzezinski and his likes! In his book Brzezinski has drawn two very interesting maps – one of these has the caption The Global Zone of Percolating Violence (page 53) and the other (page 124) is captioned The Eurasian Balkans. The first of these encircles a region which includes the following countries: Sudan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Iran, all Central Asian states, Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of Russia as well as India. The second one has two circles, an inner circle and a wider circle – the outer circle encloses the same countries as in the first map but the inner circle covers Iran, Afghanistan, eastern Turkey and the former Soviet Republics in Central Asia.

“This huge region, torn by volatile hatreds and surrounded by competing powerful neighbours, is likely to be a major battlefield…” writes Brzezinski. He further writes: “A possible challenge to American primacy from Islamic fundamentalism could be part of the problem of this unstable region.” These lines were written at a time when this kind of fundamentalism was not a problem – subsequently the US manipulated things and chose to make it one by its provocative and deceptive tactics. According to its strategic thinkers, the US might face a serious challenge from a coalition of China, Russia and Iran and must do whatever it can to prevent such a coalition from forming.

For Brzezinski, “terrorism” – a Tavistock-type concept – is just a well planned and well thought out strategy, a lie and a deception, to provide cover for a military presence in the Central Eurasian region and elsewhere. It is being used to keep the US public in a state of fear, to keep Russia in a state of insecurity about further breakup (the US has trained and supported Chechen fighters, “terrorists,” throughout) and to justify presence of US troops in and around Central Asia.

The Concocted War on Terrorism

Terrorism provides justification for transforming the United States into a police state. According to the Washington Post of 20 & 21 December 2010, the US now has 4,058 anti-terrorism organisations! These are certainly not meant for those so-called terrorists who operate in Central Asia – the number far exceeds the number of so-called terrorists in the entire world. Unbridled domestic spying by US agencies is now a fact of life and the US public, as always, has accepted this because of the collusion of media and Tavistock type institutes owned by the elite.

The US historian Howard Zinn puts it very well: “The so-called war on terrorism is not only a war against innocent people in other countries, but also a war on the people of the United States: a war on our liberties, a war on our standard of living. The wealth of the country is being stolen from the people and handed over to the superrich. The lives of our young are being stolen. And the thieves are in the White House.” Actually the thieves control the White House and have been doing so for a very long time.

In his outstanding book Crossing the Rubicon, Michael Ruppert points out that much of the violence in the Central Asian region as well as in Pakistan, which has been encircled in two maps in Brzezinski’s book, was “initiated by the US proxies.” “Given that these maps were published a full four years before the first plane hit the World Trade Centre, they would fall in a category of evidence I learned about at LAPD [Los Angeles Police Department]. We called them ‘clues’.” This means that the eruption of US militarism after 9/11, and the event itself, were part of a pre-planned and coherent strategy of global domination in which the people of the US were also “conquered” through totalitarian legislation carried out in the wake of 9/11.

As Brzezinski puts it:

America is too democratic at home to be autocratic abroad. This limits the use of America’s power, especially its capacity for military intimidation. Never before has a popular democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being… The economic self-denial (that is, defence spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilisation.

Certainly post 9/11 legislation, the extraordinary expansion of agencies and surveillance of the US public is a cause of great satisfaction for the elite – the US can hardly be called a democracy now. As reported by the Washington Post, the National Security Agency intercepts over 1.7 billion emails, phone calls and other communications every day and stores them. No wonder Bush called 9/11 “a great opportunity” and Rumsfeld saw it analogous to World War II to “refashion the world.”

In order to achieve the objectives of the elite, the US destroyed Yugoslavia while Russia stood by mesmerised and impotent, carried out regime changes in Central Asia, set up military bases in East Europe and Central Asia, and staged highly provocative military exercises testing Russia’s and China’s will. It set up a military base in Kyrgyzstan that has a 500 mile or so border with China. When the Chinese protested recent naval exercises with South Korea were too close to Chinese territory, a US spokesman responded: “Those determinations are made by us, and us alone… Where we exercise, when we exercise, with whom and how, with what assets and so forth are determinations that are made by the United States Navy, by the Department of Defence, by the United States government.”As journalist Rick Rozoff notes: “There is no way such confrontational, arrogant and vulgar language was not understood at its proper value in Beijing.”

The US has acquired bases in Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, and the Czech Republic – and set up the largest military base ever built in the region, Camp Bondsteel, in Kosovo. According to a report in the Russian Kommersantnewspaper on 3 March 2011, a four-phase plan for deployment of a US missile system in Europe is to be fully implemented by the end of 2020. The US is also busy setting up bilateral military ties in Russia’s backyard with Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and is pursuing the goal of a “Greater Central Asia” from Afghanistan right up to the Middle East, a great corridor from where the oil, gas, and great mineral wealth of this region will flow to the coffers of the US elite, at bloody expense to the local people.

As remarked by the Indian career diplomat M.K. Bhadrakumar: “The time is not far off before they begin to sense that ‘the war on terror’ is providing a convenient rubric under which the US is incrementally securing for itself a permanent abode in the highlands of Hindu Kush, the Pamirs, Central Asian steppes and the Caucasus that form the strategic hub overlooking Russia, China, India and Iran.” The scene for a great war involving the great powers of the time – US, Russia and China – is now set, by design of the elite. It is just a matter of time.

Time and again the US elite has taken its good people into great wars through documented and proven deceptions – the sinking of the Lusitania during World War I, Pearl Harbour in World War II, and so on. The elite considers us “human garbage” – a term first used by the French in Indo-China. It is also generating a good deal of “human garbage” in the US. A World Bank report points out that in 2005, 28 million Americans were “insecure” – in 2007 the number had risen to 46 million! One in every five Americans is faced with the possibility of becoming “destitute” – 38 million people receive food coupons!

Michael Ruppert laments:

My country is dead. Its people have surrendered to tyranny and in so doing, they have become tyranny’s primary support group; its base; its defender. Every day they offer their endorsement of tyranny by banking in its banks and spending their borrowed money with the corporations that run it. The great Neocon strategy of George H.W. Bush has triumphed. Convince the America people that they can’t live without the ‘good things’, then sit back and watch as they endorse the progressively more outrageous crimes you commit as you throw them bones with ever less meat on them. All the while lock them into debt. Destroy the middle class, the only political base that need be feared. Make them accept, because of their shared guilt, ever-more repressive police state measures. Do whatever you want.

A global economic system erected on inhuman and predatory values, where a few possess more wealth than the billions of hungry put together, will end, but the end will be painful and bloody. It is a system in which the elite thrives on war and widespread human misery, on death and destruction by design. As Einstein said, “I do not know how the Third World War will be fought, but I can tell you what they will use in the Fourth – sticks and stones!”

Posted in PoliticsComments Off on The Elite, the ‘Great Game’ and World War III

IsraHell Always Needs Existential Threat to Survive: Nima Shirazi Interview



VT Interviews Nima Shirazi on Israeli-American Relations, Iran’s Nuclear Program, the Death of Osama Bin Laden and Western Media Propaganda against Iran

by Kourosh Ziabari

Nima Shirazi

About Nima Shirazi

Nima Shirazi is a political commentator from New York City. His analysis of United States foreign policy and Middle East issues, particularly with reference to current events in Israel, Palestine, and Iran, is published on his website,

His articles and commentaries are published on a variety of online and print publications including Foreign Policy Journal, Palestine Chronicle, Mondoweiss, Media with Conscience, Monthly Review, Dissident Voice, Salem-News, Middle East Online, Indymedia, The Palestine Telegraph and Axis of Logic.

Shirazi is widely acclaimed for his precise and accurate analysis of the Middle East events and the U.S. foreign policy.

The world-renowned author and political scientist Norman Finkelstein has praised Nima Shirazi’s work, saying that he is “a very smart fellow and remarkably well informed. It’s worth taking the time to read what he writes.”

Jeremy R. Hammond, political journalist and the editor of Foreign Policy Journal has said about him: “Nima Shirazi is a brilliant analyst whose writing gets right to the heart of the issue without any messing around. Reading articles in not only the mainstream media, but also on alternative and independent websites and blogs, is generally a frustrating experience, for the broad adherence of most (actually, almost all) commentators to a limited manufactured framework.”

What follows is the complete text of my interview with Nima Shirazi with whom I discussed on a variety of issues including Israeli-American relations, Iran’s nuclear program, the death of Osama Bin Laden and the Western media propaganda against Iran.

Kourosh Ziabari: As you have pointed out in your articles, over the past decade Israel has been continuously threatening Iran with preemptive military strikes. War threats have been an inseparable part of the U.S.-backed, Zionist-run propaganda project against Iran. The question which I want to raise is that, from a legal point of view, shouldn’t incessant war threats by a fake political entity against a sovereign nation be followed by the decisive action of the international organizations, such as the United Nations Security Council? Why doesn’t this aggressive fear-mongering have any punitive consequence for the Israeli regime?

Nima Shirazi: Considering no amount of actual Israeli aggression, whether in the form of ethnically cleansing East Jerusalem, shooting unarmed Palestinian protesters in the occupied West Bank, dropping bombs and white phosphorous on a besieged civilian population in Gaza, or murdering Turkish peace activists in international waters, is met with anything but unconditional support by Western powers, it’s hardly surprising that Israel has been getting away with threatening a military attack on Iran for decades now. While it is true that both “the threat or use of force” is forbidden by the United Nations Charter, and therefore a breach of international law, it has long been clear that Israel is immune to such scrutiny as its ongoing violence is repeatedly justified, endorsed, and funded by the United States.

One of the primary reasons for this impunity is the successful promotion of Zionist mythologies in American political discourse. These mythologies, which go unquestioned and are often repeated by both Israeli and U.S. officials, serve to cast Israel – a heavily militarized, nuclear-armed hegemonic power – in the role of perpetual victim, always on the defensive. The result is emotional blackmail on an international level. This perennial victimhood completely inverts cause and effect. As a result, the oppressed becomes the oppressor, the culprit becomes the victim, occupation is security, illegal colonization is cultural liberation, aggressive expansion is righteous reclamation, genocide is self-defense, apartheid is justice, resistance is terrorism, and ethnic cleansing is peace.

The fear-mongering over a phantom Iranian nuclear bomb, a manufactured specter of death and destruction promoted by the U.S. and Israel for the past three decades, is invariably coupled with allusions to the Holocaust in which the Islamic Republic of Iran is the new Nazi Germany, Ahmadinejad is Hitler, Israel’s very existence is threatened, and Jews worldwide face imminent extinction. As an Israeli Iran expert once explained to Trita Parsi, “You have to recognize that we Israelis need an existential threat. It is part of the way we view the world. If we can find more than one, that would be preferable, but we will settle for one.”

The consequence of such dishonest and dangerous analogies is clear, as Peter Beinart pointed out last year in The New York Review of Books, “In the world of AIPAC, the Holocaust analogies never stop, and their message is always the same: Jews are licensed by their victimhood to worry only about themselves.”

Recent comments by both Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu are both illustrative and instructive. Obama, speaking the other day at the 2011 AIPAC Conference, managed to weave a string of Zionist talking points together in one dazzling sentence: “When I went to Sderot and saw the daily struggle to survive in the eyes of an eight-year-old boy who lost his leg to a Hamas rocket, and when I walked among the Hall of Names at Yad Vashem, I was reminded of the existential fear of Israelis when a modern dictator seeks nuclear weapons and threatens to wipe Israel off the face of the map — face of the Earth.”

Naturally, there is no mention or acknowledgement of the daily terror experienced by Palestinian children in Gaza who are subject to, not only deliberate sonic booms and collective punishment, but also U.S.-supplied Israeli fighter jets, attack helicopters, unmanned aerial drones, missiles, bombshells, bullets, and chemical, banned, and experimental weaponry. Needless to say, terming Ahmadinejad a “dictator” demonstrates a distinct lack of understanding about the Iranian political system. There is absolutely no evidence Iran is seeking nuclear weapons – Obama’s own intelligence apparatus has consistently confirmed this – and the absurd “wipe Israel off the face of the map” quote has long been debunked. For the American president to repeat all these lies – in one sentence, no less – demonstrates the power and pervasiveness of Zionist mythology.

Netanyahu used a nearly identical formulation is his recent speech to a special joint session of Congress. “As for Israel, if history has taught the Jewish people anything, it is that we must take calls for our destruction seriously,” he declared.”We are a nation that rose from the ashes of the Holocaust. When we say never again, we mean never again. Israel always reserves the right to defend itself.”

Netanyahu’s turn of phrase is ironic considering the title of former Knesset speaker Avraham Burg’s 2008 book, “The Holocaust Is Over; We Must Rise From Its Ashes,” in which Burg exposes the purpose of playing the victim. “Victimhood sets you free,” he wrote. Over thirty years ago, in 1980, Israeli journalist Boaz Evron put it another way: “If we assume the world hates us and persecutes us, we feel exempted from the need to be accountable for our actions towards it.”

The United States, which wields unparalleled power over international institutions such as the UN Security Council, has long dedicated itself to promoting this narrative and protecting its partner-in-war crimes Israel from any diplomatic or political scrutiny.

KZ: In your recent article, you referred to the remarks made by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who said in an interview with Charlie Rose that Iran does have the courage to announce its intention to build nuclear bombs if it ever has one. My question is that, are the United States and its European allies, really unaware of the fact that Iran does not have nuclear weapons and doesn’t intend to build them? It’s quite inconceivable that with its sophisticated intelligence structure, the United States hasn’t really come to the point that Iran doesn’t have nuclear bombs nor does it intend to make one. Is it all about black propaganda and fear-mongering to discredit Iran and derail its status as a regional superpower or a simple lack of sufficient information?

NS: Despite all the war-mongering rhetoric, the United States government is well aware that Iran’s nuclear energy program remains peaceful and fully monitored by the IAEA. Its own intelligence agencies have consistently reaffirmed the non-military nature of the program, from the recently updated National Intelligence Estimate to its Annual Threat Assessments, and maintain that Iran’s military strategy is purely defensive, not aggressive.

Iran is one of the only nations in the world that refuses to back down from its own inalienable rights in the face of Western, namely U.S., pressure. While Obama often declares his solidarity with the Iranian people which he sees as unsupportive of its own government – another fallacy based mostly on Western wishful thinking, he ignores that, according to a recent RAND Corporation survey, 87% of Iranians strongly favor the “Iranian development of nuclear energy for civilian use,” while a whopping 98% believe that the “possession of nuclear energy is a national right.” By insisting that Iran relinquish its rights as affirmed by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which Iran has been a signatory for over four decades, Obama reveals himself as a hypocrite and a bully.

KZ: The United States is apparently clinging to double standards when it comes to Israel’s nuclear program. Almost everyone knows that the Israeli regime is the sole possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East. It does possess up to 200 nuclear warheads in its arsenal, and none of the international organizations, including IAEA have ever dared to question or investigate this dangerous arsenal. Once in an interview with me, the writer Joshua Frank said that the “United States doesn’t have to justify its double standards to anyone,” because of the arrogant nature of its statesmen and the complicated structure of what Hamid Golpira calls its “corporatocracy.” What’s your viewpoint in this regard?

NS: The duplicity of both the United States and Israel when it comes to the nuclear issue is astounding. During his recent speech to Congress, Israel Prime Minster Netanyahu actually suggested with a serious face that “a nuclear-armed Iran would ignite a nuclear arms race in the Middle East,” as if his own country – with its own massive nuclear stockpile – either didn’t exist or wasn’t in the Middle East.

It is both official Israeli and U.S. policy that Israel’s nuclear arsenal goes unacknowledged. This policy was established between President Richard Nixon and Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir in 1969. A declassified memo from Nixon’s national security adviser Henry Kissinger, dated July 19, 1969, notes, “While we might ideally like to halt actual Israeli possession, what we really want at a minimum may be just to keep Israeli possession from becoming an established international fact.” Accordingly, Nixon formally suspended all inspection of Israel’s Dimona nuclear plant in 1970 and ceased demands that Israel to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The next year, the Nixon administration sold Israel hundreds of krytons, a type of high-speed switch necessary for the development of nuclear warheads.

When Obama first met with Netanyahu in May 2009, he confirmed the continuity of the secret agreement, a stance one Senate staffer reportedly described as “call[ing] into question virtually every part of the president’s nonproliferation agenda” and which was tantamount to giving “Israel an NPT treaty get out of jail free card.”

Israeli nuclear expert Avner Cohen has described the denial policy as the equivalent of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” Yet, when officials are occasionally asked, the policy invariably becomes “don’t tell, then quickly change the subject to the manufactured Iranian threat.”

In recent years, there have been efforts by NPT members to pressure the IAEA to investigate and inspect Israel’s nuclear arsenal. These actions have all been opposed by Western states, led by the U.S. Last year, all 189 member nations of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty including both the United States and Iran agreed to “the establishment of a Middle East zone, free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction.” Unsurprisingly, Israel denounced the accord, describing it as “deeply flawed and hypocritical” and declared, “As a nonsignatory state of the NPT, Israel is not obligated by the decisions of this Conference, which has no authority over Israel. Given the distorted nature of this resolution, Israel will not be able to take part in its implementation.”

In June 2010, IAEA Director General Yukiyo Amano asked all member states to submit their review to support the implementation of a 2009 IAEA resolution which expressed “concern about the Israeli nuclear capabilities, and calls upon Israel to accede to the NPT and place all its nuclear facilities under comprehensive IAEA safeguards.” In response, Obama reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to double standards when it comes to Israel during a meeting with Netanyahu. After decrying efforts to supposedly “single out” Israel, Obama proceeded to do just that, claiming that, of all countries in the world, “Israel has unique security requirements.” He then vowed that, with regards to any international efforts towards weapons control and decommissioning nuclear weapons, the “United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would undermine their security interests” and promised to maintain Israel’s “qualitative military edge” in the region. In September 2010, after intense U.S. lobbying on behalf of Israel, IAEA members narrowly rejected the resolution with a vote of 51 against, 46 for, and 23 abstentions. The hypocrisy continues.

KZ: You may admit that the image which the Western mainstream media have portrayed of Iran is basically distorted, unrealistic and misleading. Many American citizens who believe that Iran is working on the development of a nuclear bomb have simply heard the name of Iran in the form of stereotypes such as the ongoing controversy over its nuclear program and mass demonstrations in which people chant “Death to America.” They are credulously ignorant of Iran’s brilliant civilization and culture and even assume that Iran is an Arab country. The Western state-run media have introduced Iran as a promoter of extremism and what they call Islamic fundamentalism, turning a blind eye to the fact that their staunch allies such as Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Egypt are the motherlands of international terrorism. What’s your viewpoint regarding the portrayal of Iran in the Western media? How is it possible to change the viewpoint of the Western citizens about Iran and acquaint them with its concealed realities?

NS: The negative image of Iran as presented by Western media is nearly impenetrable. The reason for this is simple. Iran is one of the only countries in recent history to have successfully challenged Western imperialism and assert its independence from U.S. hegemony. As a result, it is mercilessly demonized in ways countries with far worse human rights records are not. In the United States, rampant anti-Iran propaganda serves to inure an increasingly militarized American populace to the reality of devastating sanctions which harm the Iranian public, sometimes with lethal consequences in the form of air safety, for example, and the possibility of military assault.

Interviewer, Kourosh Ziabari

Despite the fact that absolutely no evidence has ever been found to support allegations of election fraud in June 2009, the Western press still pushes that lie to great effect. It is no wonder that, just last year, a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll found that 71% of Americans believed Iran already had nuclear weapons.

Iranian women make up well over half of university students and hold high level jobs in all kinds of professions; they are business owners, doctors, lawyers, university professors, filmmakers, artists, writers, and Cabinet ministers. Iran is home to an ancient, vibrant, and proud Jewish community, which is the largest in the Middle East outside Israel. Yet no one seriously promotes sanctioning or bombing Saudi Arabia, America’s staunch monarchical ally and business partner that arrests women for driving cars. Quite the contrary, in fact. Just last year, the United States made a deal to sell the Saudi kingdom $60 billion worth of military equipment. And yes, that’s billion with a “b.” Such is the power of propaganda.

Challenging popular perceptions about Iran is difficult, which is why the excellent work of analysts like Flynt and Hillary Mann Leverett, Hooman Majd, Sharmine Narwani, Cyrus Safdari, Jeremy R. Hammond, Abolghasem Bayyenat, Phil Wilayto, Jim Lobe, Ali Gharib, Eli Clifton, Gareth Porter, and Eric Brill, among a number of others, is invaluable and important. Hopefully, by supplanting war-mongering propaganda with facts, a more honest discourse about the future of the relationship between the West – notably the U.S. – and Iran can emerge, a discourse not influenced primarily by Zionist talking points and American exceptionalism.

KZ: Let’s move on to the recent developments in the Middle East. The Arab Spring seems to have emerged quite unexpectedly and abruptly. An unassuming street vendor poured inflammable liquid over his body and set himself alight before the municipality office in Tunisia in protest to the female officer who had insulted him, tens of thousands of his fellow citizens took to the streets to express their sympathy with him, their demonstrations turned violent and gradually changed into a revolution and the revolution soon encompassed the whole Arab world and resulted in what we are witnessing these days. What’s your viewpoint about the Arab world uprisings? What factors did contribute to the emergence of these chained revolutions? Is the United States, which calls itself the champion of democracy, happy with the pro-democracy movement of the Arab nations?

NS: While there is plenty of evidence that the United States has long been engaged in so-called “democracy promotion” in the region (ironic to say the least considering that the most despotic and dictatorial regimes in the region have been primarily financed and supported by the U.S.), I think it is indisputable that the recent events are indigenous and genuine.

While it is true that Zionist-influenced NGOs and pseudo-NGOs may advocate for “democratic change” in predominately Arab and Muslim countries, and the hypocrisy and duplicity of these organizations are obvious (especially since the same groups encouraged the invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq and support the ongoing occupation and apartheid in Palestine), I don’t believe this necessarily translates into their blanket support of what’s actually happening now across the Middle East and North Africa.

Advocating “democracy” has far more to do with encouraging technocratic Western- and Israeli-friendly movements among Arab youth sectors, movements that – ideally – would embrace neoliberal economic policy and neoconservative foreign policy. In my view, these “democracy promoters” have seen their talking points backfire and genuine movements of self-determination, sovereignty, and representative foreign policy have emerged to challenge the decade-long stranglehold of Western-backed dictatorships across the region.

In short, I don’t think what we’re seeing is one big American or Zionist ruse, though we are obviously seeing a lot of panicked backtracking, frantic horse-backing, embarrassing sidestepping, and misguided wishful thinking.

Recently, former IDF prison guard Jeffrey Goldberg posted an interview he conducted with Hillary Clinton, in which Clinton noted this: “Israeli commentators [are] saying they’re not so sure that change in Syria is in Israel’s interest.”

Still, I find analysis of Western and Israeli promotion of color revolutions (the impressive research of Maidhc Ó Cathail comes to mind) to be vitally important in assessing the many complex dynamics of what directs U.S. and Zionist foreign policy. “Democracy promotion” is an imperial and post-colonial construct that hopes to engineer and capitalize (pun intended) on changing and nascent power structures. I think the democracies both the U.S. and Israel would want to see emerge in the Middle East – since the dictatorships they have long propped-up are clearly unsustainable – are vastly different than what is actually happening. And that’s certainly a good thing.

KZ: Israel seems to be quite anxious about the Middle East revolutions since it is losing its allies in the region one after another. The homicidal assault of the Israel Defense Forces on the Freedom Flotilla in May 2010 cost Israel its friendship with Turkey. Now, with the ouster of the U.S. puppet Hosni Mubark, Israel is losing another ally. What will be the impacts of the Middle East uprisings on the future of Israel? What’s your analysis of the political prospect of Israel in the light of the recent unity deal between Hamas and Fatah brokered by the new government of Egypt?

NS: With regard to Egypt’s (hopefully) burgeoning democracy, I think it’s clear Israel is terrified, as it no longer has a reliable partner in occupation and collective punishment, and has seemingly lost a willing participant in their ongoing propaganda campaign of demonization against Iran. On May 5, the Washington Post published an interview with Egypt’s Foreign Minister Nabil El Araby, during which El Araby clearly stated his pride in and took credit for the recent “reconciliation” between Fatah and Hamas and new Egyptian initiatives to “alleviate the suffering of the people in Gaza.” He also said that “Iran is not an enemy. We have no enemies.”

Soon thereafter, the Post published another interview, this time with Amr Moussa, longtime secretary-general of the Arab League and current Egyptian presidential hopeful, in which Moussa echoed the sentiments of El Araby. He stated, “Iran is not the natural enemy of Arabs, and it shouldn’t be. We have a lot to gain by peaceful relations — or less tense relations — with Iran,” in addition to noting the hypocrisy of the United States when it comes to the nuclear issue. “The nuclear issue in the Middle East means Israel and then Iran,” he said, clearly making a point about which one is more pressing and dangerous.

None of this plays into Israel’s hands and I don’t think this is a long con.

Granted, not every development has been positive. In mid-May, for example, over 350 protesters were injured and 150 arrested when Egyptian military and riot police forces broke up a protest commemorating the Palestinian Nakba at the Israeli embassy in Cairo. Still, as governments in the region become more beholden and responsive to the wills of their citizens, the American and Israeli stranglehold will continue to lose its grip.

KZ: You wrote on your website that the accounts of Glenn Greenwald, David Sirota, Chris Floyd, Haim Baram, Cord Jefferson, Chris Hayes and Kai Wright are quite close to your own interpretation of the assassination of Osama Bin Laden by the American forces. Would you please elaborate on your own take on the death of the Al-Qaeda leader? Why didn’t the United States capture Bin Laden alive? He could have potentially released so much precious information regarding the structure of his terrorist organization. Why did they kill him while he could have been more valuable alive?

NS: Even if we are to believe the official story about the U.S. raid in Abbottabad, myriad questions remain regarding the legality of such an operation. It is clear that orders were for the U.S. forces to kill bin Laden on site, rather than attempt to capture him. While it remains a topic of debate whether or not bin Laden could be classified as a military or civilian target, each label brings with it specific legal considerations, perhaps the most troubling aspect of all this is the undeniable indifference to international law and to the concept of justice on the part of both the U.S. government and the American public.

Correspondents for The Atlantic reported, soon after the raid, that “capturing bin Laden alive would have also presented the administration with an array of nettlesome legal and political challenges” and that “the administration was also wary of the congressional scrutiny that would have surrounded every decision it made about bin Laden’s legal fate.” Another article stated, “The White House made clear to JSOC that it strongly preferred to have bin Laden killed, rather than captured, because the administration had no good idea where to put him.” Adam Serwer, in The American Prospect, noted that “attempting to bring bin Laden to American soil, even for trial, could have created a political firestorm.”

So, instead of dealing with these inconvenient trifles such as “law” and “justice,” Obama decided to just kill bin Laden, since it was certainly far easier to shoot him in the face and dump him in the ocean. In strict accordance to Islamic principles, of course, just like all Muslim sea burials off the sides of U.S. aircraft carriers.

This appears to be wholly at odds with what Obama himself has long touted as his respect for and adherence to so-called “American values.” Nevertheless, the American public rejoiced that, as Obama claimed, “Justice has been done.” But revenge, however viscerally satisfying it may be for some, is not justice. After a decade of constant invasion and occupation, of assassination and air strikes, of kidnapping and torture, of military commissions and indefinite detention, it is abundantly clear that Americans have completely forgotten what justice and accountability actually is, replacing it with drone attacks, extrajudicial killings, and an seemingly unquenchable thirst for vengeance.

As Adam Serwer, with whom I disagree on a number of aspects of the bin Laden story, accurately and articulately remarked, “there’s something deeply tragic about the fact that even in death, bin Laden still managed to make us afraid of our own system of justice.”

KZ: Osama Bin Laden’s story is to some extent similar to what happened to Saddam Hussein. Saddam was armed and equipped by the U.S. to fight Iran and was taken out while his expiration date came. Bin Laden was similarly equipped and trained by the U.S. to battle the Soviet forces in Afghanistan, and now was removed as he was not useful for the U.S. purposes anymore. How can one come to terms with the fact that the U.S. grows up dangerous terrorists to serve their interests and then kills them once they lose their value?

NS: The bin Laden narrative, just as the Saddam narrative before it, is yet one more example of the United States’ selective and short-term foreign policy. The same could be said with regard to its three decade support for the Mubarak regime. One could say the United States was for Osama bin Laden before it was against him. The U.S. makes decisions based on its immediate policy, economic, and military goals, not on long-term or even beneficial national strategies. It refers to resistance groups as terrorists and vice versa as best suits its current situation. Remember, Nelson Mandela was on the U.S. Terrorist Watch List until just a few years ago.

Empires need enemies more than they need allies. The trick is figuring out who or what is the enemy du jour and then attempting to find out why. Sometimes the answers come easy, sometimes they don’t. If the tenets of international law and human rights were applied universally by the United States, not only would American hegemony and militarism dissolve, but I’d also have nothing to write about. And that would truly be wonderful.

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on IsraHell Always Needs Existential Threat to Survive: Nima Shirazi Interview

Human Rights Activist Close to Getting U.S. Comment on IsraHell Nuclear Whistleblower, Mordechai Vanunu


When President Obama took office, Eileen Fleming began phoning, faxing and e-mailing him and Secretary of State Clinton seeking a statement regarding the fact that Israel continues to deny the Nuclear Whistle Blower, Mordechai Vanunu, the right to leave the state ever since he emerged from a tomb-sized, windowless cell on 21 April 2004; after 18 years in jail for telling the world the truthproviding the photographic proof that Israel had manufactured upwards of 200 nuclear warheads by 1986, in the Dimona’s seven-story underground nuclear facility.

By Eillen Fleming in We Are Wide Awake
– author of BEYOND NUCLEAR: Mordechai Vanunu’s FREEDOM of SPEECH Trial and My Life as a Muckraker

For the last two years, I have been requesting a statement from this Administration vis-à-vis the fact that Israel’s very statehood was established contingent upon their upholding the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. As a co-signer of the Declaration of Human Rights, America is responsible for holding all Member States accountable when they fail to honor it. I have relentlessly reminded my government that Article 13-2 guarantees “Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.”

Both Mr. Edgar Vasques, State Department Media Affairs Officer and Ms. Nicole Thompson, Press Relations Officer for Clinton, have been gracious to me and Ms. Thompson even raised my hopes when she told me, “it is not impossible to receive an answer from the Secretary of State.”

As we cannot know the future, there is no way to ascertain the impossible so I persist. De Gaul pulled all of France’s million settlers out of Algeria when few believed he would. For decades, South African whites refused to share power with the country’s black majority, and then, overnight, they agreed to do exactly that! The Iron Curtain and the Berlin Wall both fell; and so, I struggle now to break down the walls of hypocrisy that the New York Times illuminated which also led me to comprehend why I have not received a statement from The White House, regarding Vanunu yet.

“The Dimona complex in the Negev desert is famous as the heavily guarded heart of Israel’s never-acknowledged nuclear arms program, where neat rows of factories make atomic fuel for the arsenal. Over the past two years, according to intelligence and military experts familiar with its operations, Dimona has taken on a new, equally secret role — as a critical testing ground in a joint American and Israeli effort to undermine Iran’s efforts to make a bomb of its own. Behind Dimona’s barbed wire, the experts say, Israel has spun nuclear centrifuges virtually identical to Iran’s at Natanz, where Iranian scientists are struggling to enrich uranium. They say Dimona tested the effectiveness of the Stuxnet computer worm, a destructive program that appears to have wiped out roughly a fifth of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges and helped delay, though not destroy, Tehran’s ability to make its first nuclear arms.

“Though American and Israeli officials refuse to talk publicly about what goes on at Dimona, the operations there, as well as related efforts in the United States, are among the newest and strongest clues suggesting that the virus was designed as an American-Israeli project to sabotage the Iranian program…Officially, neither American nor Israeli officials will even utter the name of the malicious computer program, much less describe any role in designing it.

“How and when Israel obtained this kind of first-generation centrifuge remains unclear, whether from Europe, or the Khan network, or by other means. But nuclear experts agree that Dimona came to hold row upon row of spinning centrifuges…Another clue involves the United States….[An] expert added that Israel worked in collaboration with the United States in targeting Iran, but that Washington was eager for ‘plausible deniability.’” [1]

“On the day of the termination of the British mandate and on the strength of the United Nations General Assembly declare The State of Israel will be based on freedom, justice and peace as envisaged by the prophets of Israel: it will ensure complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants irrespective of religion it will guarantee freedom of religion [and] conscience and will be faithful to the Charter of the United Nations.” – May 14, 1948. The Declaration of the Establishment of Israel

When FDR met with labor leaders for four hours in 1934, he told them, “You’ve convinced me that you are right. Now, go out there and FORCE ME TO DO IT.”

What he meant, was that the pressures on a President to stay with the status quo, the forces of the economic and political elites of the country so enormous, that even when a President wants to change direction, he requires forces that will push him in the correct direction.

On April 5, 2009, President Obama raised the hopes of millions with his promises in Prague:

We are here today because enough people ignored the voices who told them that the world could not change. We’re here today because of the courage of those who stood up and took risks to say that freedom is a right for all people, no matter what side of a wall they live on, and no matter what they look like. We are here today because the simple and principled pursuit of liberty and opportunity shamed those who relied on the power of tanks and arms to put down the will of a people.

Some argue that the spread of these weapons cannot be stopped, cannot be checked – that we are destined to live in a world where more nations and more people possess the ultimate tools of destruction. Such fatalism is a deadly adversary, for if we believe that the spread of nuclear weapons is inevitable, then in some way we are admitting to ourselves that the use of nuclear weapons is inevitable.

As the only nuclear power to have used a nuclear weapon, the United States has a moral responsibility to act…It will take patience and persistence. But now we, too, must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change. We have to insist, ‘Yes, we can.’

There is violence and injustice in our world that must be confronted. We must confront it by standing together as free nations, as free people. I know that a call to arms can stir the souls of men and women more than a call to lay them down. But that is why the voices for peace and progress must be raised together.

Let us honor our past by reaching for a better future. Let us bridge our divisions, build upon our hopes, and accept our responsibility to leave this world more prosperous and more peaceful than we found it. Together we can do it.

Words must mean something [and] violence and injustice must be confronted by standing together as free nations, as free people…[and] Human destiny will be what we make of it.

In 1987, from Ashkelon prison, Vanunu wrote:

“The passive acceptance and complacency with regard to the existence of nuclear weapons anywhere on earth is the disease of society today…This struggle is not only a legitimate one – it is a moral, inescapable struggle…no government, not even the most democratic, can force us to live under this threat. No state in the world can offer any kind of security against this menace of a nuclear holocaust, or guarantee to prevent it.

“Already now there are enough nuclear missiles to destroy the world many times over…This issue should unite us all, because that is our real enemy…Any country, which manufactures and stocks nuclear weapons, is first of all endangering its own citizens. This is why the citizens must confront their government and warn it that it has no right to expose them to this danger.

“Because, in effect, the citizens are being held hostage by their own government, just as if they have been hijacked and deprived of their freedom and threatened…Indeed, when governments develop nuclear weapons without the consent of their citizens – and this is true in most cases – they are violating the basic rights of their citizens, the basic right not to live under constant threat of annihilation.

”Is any government qualified and authorized to produce such weapons?”

In 2005, Vanunu told me:

“When I became the spy for the world, I did it all for the people of the world. If governments do not report the truth, and if the media does not report the truth, then all we can do is follow our consciences. Daniel Ellsberg did, the woman from Enron did, and I did.

“President Kennedy tried to stop Israel from building atomic weapons. Prime Minister Ben Guirion said, ‘The nuclear reactor is only for peace.”

“Kennedy insisted on an open internal inspection. He wrote letters demanding that Ben Guirion open up the Dimona for inspection.

“When Johnson became president, he made an agreement with Israel that two senators would come every year to inspect. Before the senators would visit, the Israelis would build a wall to block the underground elevators and stairways. From 1963 to ’69, the senators came, but they never knew about the wall that hid the rest of the Dimona from them.

“Nixon stopped the inspections and agreed to ignore the situation. As a result, Israel increased production. In 1986, there were over two hundred bombs. Today, they may have enough plutonium for ten bombs a year.

“The Israelis have 200 atomic weapons and they accuse the Palestinians and Muslims of terrorism. The Dimona is 46 years old; reactors last 25 to 30 years. The Dimona has never been inspected and Israel has never signed the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty but all the Arab states have.

“Twenty years ago when I worked there they only produced when the air was blowing towards Jordan ten miles away. No one knows what is happening now. The world needs to wake up and see the real terrorism is the occupation and the Palestinians have lived under that terror regime for 40 years.”

While campaigning, Obama once admitted that if we took the Sermon on the Mount seriously, it would lead to the abolishment of the Industrial Military Complex and “Our problems stem from our acceptance of this filthy, rotten system.”-Dorothy Day

“You cannot talk like sane men around a peace table while the atomic bomb itself is ticking beneath it. Do not treat the atomic bomb as a weapon of offense; do not treat it as an instrument of the police. Treat the bomb for what it is: the visible insanity of a civilization that has ceased…to obey the laws of life.”- Lewis Mumford, 1946.

There can be no question that unless nuclear weapons and war are abolished and all people are free and known as equals; the world will remain in a state of madness run by hypocrites in high places.

JFK vs Israel and Dimona – The Stand, Murder, and Takeover (John F. Kennedy)

Posted in Human RightsComments Off on Human Rights Activist Close to Getting U.S. Comment on IsraHell Nuclear Whistleblower, Mordechai Vanunu

Shoah’s pages