Archive | November 24th, 2011

IsraHell: A strategic U.S. asset?

NOVANEWS

Nathan Guttman has an interesting article in The Jewish Daily Forward highlighting a recently released study from the Zionist-NeoCon think tank, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Guttman writes:

A new study from a Washington think tank supportive of ties between America and Israel is seeking to rebut growing sentiment among military experts who question Israel’s value as a U.S. strategic asset.

The report, released November 2 by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, argues that the benefits of America’s close military ties to Israel far outweigh the costs those ties impose on America’s relations with the Arab and Muslim worlds. Its authors, Robert Blackwill and Walter Slocombe, take issue in particular with those who argue that relations between the U.S. and Israel are a one-way street, with Israel on the receiving side.

“We reject that analysis,” write the two analysts, a Democrat and Republican, respectively, who both served in senior national security positions. “To the contrary, we believe that the United States and Israel have an impressive list of common national interests; that Israeli actions make substantial direct contributions to these U.S. interests.”

They cite, among other things, Israel’s role in developing a joint missile defense system; an American anti-missile system emplaced in Israel; shared military exercises taking place on a regular basis; the U.S. purchase of Israeli military technology, including drones, targeting equipment and armored vehicles, and counterterrorism cooperation, which includes shared intelligence and U.S. use of Israeli systems for homeland security.

Would a “U.S. strategic asset” attack and murder American servicemen, like Israel did when they attacked the USS Liberty in 1967?

ON JUNE 8, 1967, while patrolling in international waters in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, USS Liberty (AGTR-5) was savagely attacked without warning or justification by air and naval forces of the state of Israel. Of a crew of 294 officers and men (including three civilians), the ship suffered thirty four (34) killed in action and one hundred seventy three (173) wounded in action. The ship itself, a Forty Million ($40,000,000) Dollar state of the art signals intelligence (SIGINT) platform, was so badly damaged that it never sailed on an operational mission again and was sold in 1970 for $101,666.66 as scrap. [more here]

Would a “U.S. strategic asset” murder American civilians, like Israel has done on numerous occasions? 

“Rachel Corey [sic], 23 years old from the state of Washington, was killed while she was trying to prevent Israeli army bulldozers from destroying a Palestinian home. Other foreigners who were with her said the driver of the bulldozer was aware that Rachel was there, and continued to destroy the house. Initially he dropped sand and other heavy debris on her, then the bulldozer pushed her to the ground where it proceeded to drive over her, fracturing both of her arms, legs and skull. She was transferred to hospital, where she later died.” [more here]

Rachel Corrie, killed by an strategic U.S. ally illegitimate, rogue nation, Apartheid Israel.


ABC NewsAmerican, 19, Among Gaza Flotilla Dead

A U.S. citizen who lived in Turkey is among the nine people killed when Israeli commandos stormed a Turkish aid ship heading for the Gaza Strip, officials said today.

The victim was identified as Furkan Dogan, 19, a Turkish-American. A forensic report said he was shot at close range, with four bullets in his head and one in his chest, according to the Anatolian news agency.

Would a “U.S. strategic asset” steal and traffic in stolen human organs, like Israel has been caught doing? 

Last week Sweden’s largest daily newspaper published an article containing shocking material: testimony and circumstantial evidence indicating that Israelis may have been harvesting internal organs from Palestinian prisoners without consent for many years.

Worse yet, some of the information reported in the article suggests that in some instances Palestinians may have been captured with this macabre purpose in mind. [more here]

aangirfan: ISRAELIS IN HAITI FOR ORGAN HARVESTING AND CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING? 

Would a “U.S. strategic asset” distort and manipulate information to get the United States into an illegal war of aggression?

From May 2002 until February 2003, I observed firsthand the formation of the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans and watched the latter stages of the neoconservative capture of the policy-intelligence nexus in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq. This seizure of the reins of U.S. Middle East policy was directly visible to many of us working in the Near East South Asia policy office, and yet there seemed to be little any of us could do about it.

I saw a narrow and deeply flawed policy favored by some executive appointees in the Pentagon used to manipulate and pressurize the traditional relationship between policymakers in the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies.

I witnessed neoconservative agenda bearers within OSP usurp measured and carefully considered assessments, and through suppression and distortion of intelligence analysis promulgate what were in fact falsehoods to both Congress and the executive office of the president.

While this commandeering of a narrow segment of both intelligence production and American foreign policy matched closely with the well-published desires of the neoconservative wing of the Republican Party, many of us in the Pentagon, conservatives and liberals alike, felt that this agenda, whatever its flaws or merits, had never been openly presented to the American people. Instead, the public story line was a fear-peddling and confusing set of messages, designed to take Congress and the country into a war of executive choice, a war based on false pretenses, and a war one year later Americans do not really understand. That is why I have gone public with my account. [more here]

Is Israel, supposedly a strategic U.S. ally, trying to get the United States to attack Iran through propaganda and false information?

The report of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published by a Washington think tank Tuesday repeated the sensational claim previously reported by news media all over the world that a former Soviet nuclear weapons scientist had helped Iran construct a detonation system that could be used for a nuclear weapon.

But it turns out that the foreign expert, who is not named in the IAEA report [.pdf] but was identified in news reports as Vyacheslav Danilenko, is not a nuclear weapons scientist but one of the top specialists in the world in the production of nanodiamonds by explosives. […]

The unnamed member state that informed the agency about Danilenko’s alleged experience as a Soviet nuclear weapons scientist is almost certainly Israel, which has been the source of virtually all the purported intelligence on Iranian work on nuclear weapons over the past decade.

Israel has made no secret of its determination to influence world opinion on the Iranian nuclear program by disseminating information to governments and news media, including purported Iran government documents. Israeli Foreign Ministry and intelligence officials told journalists Douglas Frantz and Catherine Collins about the special unit of Mossad dedicated to that task at the very time the fraudulent documents were being produced.

In an interview in September 2008, Albright said Olli Heinonen, then deputy director for safeguards at the IAEA, had told him that a document from a member state had convinced him that the “alleged studies” documents were genuine. Albright said the state was “probably Israel.”

The Jerusalem Post‘s Yaakov Katz reported Wednesday that Israeli intelligence agencies had “provided critical information used in the report,” the purpose of which was to “push through a new regime of sanctions against Tehran.” [more here]

So, ask yourself this question: does Israel sound like a strategic U.S. asset to you?

Posted in USAComments Off on IsraHell: A strategic U.S. asset?

Arrest the banksters (and politicians), not the people

NOVANEWS

The San Diego Police Department has been on over-kill lately, arresting and harassing residents of San Diego for simply exercising their God-given, First Amendment guaranteed rights of freedom of expression and assembly.  Those participating in Occupy San Diego have not given in.  From the OB Rag, an independent media outlet based in Ocean Beach:

After being awoken by police bullhorns and rousted from their slumber by an early morning raid – and then removed from the Civic Theater grassy area, Occupy San Diego protesters are planning on marching back to the Plaza this morning.

The protesters will begin to march at 10:00 a.m. from Harbor Drive and Ash Street – near the Star of India – where they regrouped after the police raid.

Other OccupySD protesters and supporters are asked to join them as they attempt to retake the public space that has been the site of protests since October 8th.

Attorneys representing Occupy San Diego have filed a lawsuit against the City of San Diego and San Diego Police Department.  Again, from the OB Rag:

Today, November 16, 2011, free speech attorneys, LGBT rights group Canvass for a Cause, and members of the National Lawyers Guild representing Occupy San Diego protesters filed a lawsuit against the City of San Diego and the San Diego Police Department in Federal Court seeking the court to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the city and the SDPD.

“The SDPD are currently arbitrarily telling people who walk through the Civic Center that if they set down anything—their purse, their bag, a chair, or in one case even a tomato plant—, they will be arrested,” said Bryan Pease, a free speech attorney in San Diego. “The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech and the right to peacefully assemble—municipal code section 54.010 and how it is being enforced by the SDPD is unconstitutional.”

Attorneys are hopeful of their eventual success, “Even if the court does not grant the TRO because they want to allow the city time to prep their arguments, this is a text book case of unconstitutional enforcement of a municipal code and I believe we will be successful at the preliminary injunction hearing,” said Pease.

To help Occupy San Diego’s case, former San Diego City Attorney Mike Aguirre spoke in front of City Council publicly calling out the municipal code: “The provision being used by the SDPD to thwart public assembly was not intended to be so used and abridges the right of those involved to peacefully assemble. There are First Amendment rights being violated and legal research will bear it out.” […]

Occupy Wall Street protests all across the country are getting raided, with police confiscating or destroying private property and illegally arresting and otherwise mistreating those participating in this movement.

Contrast these two recent videos in San Diego alone…

…with the brief interview I did with Boyd Long, the Assistant Chief of San Diego Police, back at the beginning of October.

While We The People are being arrested for protesting our Zionist-occupied, illegitimate government, the biggest criminals in the world continue to walk free, many of them benefiting and profiting to this very day.  President Barack Obama, easily one of the biggest war criminals in the world today, was just in San Diego forVeterans Day.  NBC San Diego reported:
President Barack Obama will attend the Carrier Classic basketball game on Veterans Day on the USS Carl Vinson, the aircraft carrier that buried Osama bin Laden at sea.
The nation’s basketball-player-in-chief has accepted an invitation to attend the Nov. 11 matchup between North Carolina and Michigan State, the first college hoops game on an active flat top.
The Carl Vinson and its sailors have attracted considerable attention since early May, when the carrier conducted bin Laden’s burial at sea after he was killed by Navy SEALs in a raid ordered by Obama.
“This Veterans Day, President Obama will honor our nation’s veterans by laying a wreath at Arlington National Cemetery and then by traveling to San Diego, California, to attend the Carrier Classic on the deck of the USS Carl Vinson,” the White House said in a statement. “He looks forward to a great game between Michigan State and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.”
How Orwellian is it to read those four little paragraphs?  Obama superficially lays a wreath at Arlington National Cemetery, while he orders more and more of our family, friends, neighbors, and co-workers in the military to go fight and die thousands of miles away from their homes.  Then, travels to San Diego to… watch a basketball game.  On the deck of the ship that allegedly dumped whoever it was they dumped into the sea after they lied and said they killed Osama bin Laden.  Does it get any worse than that?
Well, yes it does.  While this criminal scum bag was watching basketball, local San Diego residents were being arrested and harassed for protesting their government for all the illegal, corrupt behavior we have witnessed for so long now.
I went down to the General Assembly meeting tonight, which took place at the downtown headquarters of the San Diego Police Department, and shared a brief message with the people and police officers there.  It’s time to start arresting the bad guys, not the poor people down at the local park or downtown area protesting the government.
Posted by John Friend

Posted in CampaignsComments Off on Arrest the banksters (and politicians), not the people

The Gerald Shea Memo: the smoking gun proving Israeli involvement in 9/11?

NOVANEWS

On the day of 9/11, a carefully scripted false narrative was developed and put forth by the criminal, Jewish-owned mainstream media (including all major Western media outlets), in conjunction with American government and military officials, and even Israeli officials. A perfect example of this was former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s testimony to the BBC, aired on 9/11 shortly after the attacks.

 

Due to this false narrative, and the psychological impact of the (false) images presented on television and in the media that day, many Americans and others around the world fail to understand that the only people actually arrested on 9/11 connected to the attacks were Israelis, all of whom had connections to Israeli military and intelligence agencies.  In fact, the East Rutherford Police Department arrested 5 Israelis on 9/11, who are often referred to as the “dancing Israelis” due to the fact they were originally identified by witnesses who saw them dancing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center Towers.  There is literally no solid evidence that any Muslims were involved in the attacks of 9/11.  

Here is the police report from the East Rutherford Police Department documenting the fact that 5 Israelis were arrested on 9/11, who were suspected of being involved or having foreknowledge of the attacks.

Police Report

 

 

Even less well-known is the fact that the DEA and other federal agencies were investigating a sophisticated, state-sponsored Israeli spy ring operating all across the United States in the months leading up to 9/11.  Mainstream media outlets reported on this spy ring, including Carl Cameron of Fox News, who quoted an anonymous U.S. government official as saying that, “Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified.  I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered.  It is classified information.” 

Shortly after this report and others were released by Carl Cameron, Fox News came under intense pressure to downplay and even censor these reports by Cameron and others detailing this Israeli “art student” spy ring, and it’s connection to 9/11.  Christopher Ketcham later wrote a lengthy report for Salon.com in May of 2002 providing more insight and detail into this spy scandal:

In January 2001, the security branch of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency began to receive a number of peculiar reports from DEA field offices across the country. According to the reports, young Israelis claiming to be art students and offering artwork for sale had been attempting to penetrate DEA offices for over a year. The Israelis had also attempted to penetrate the offices of other law enforcement and Department of Defense agencies. Strangest of all, the “students” had visited the homes of numerous DEA officers and other senior federal officials.

As a pattern slowly emerged, the DEA appeared to have been targeted in what it called an “organized intelligence gathering activity.” […]

Agents of the DEA, ATF, Air Force, Secret Service, FBI, and U.S. Marshals Service documented some 130 separate incidents of “art student” encounters. Some of the Israelis were observed diagramming the inside of federal buildings. Some were found carrying photographs they had taken of federal agents. One was discovered with a computer printout in his luggage that referred to “DEA groups.”

In some cases, the Israelis visited locations not known to the public — areas without street addresses, for example, or DEA offices not identified as such — leading authorities to suspect that information had been gathered from prior surveillance or perhaps electronically, from credit cards and other sources. One Israeli was discovered holding banking receipts for substantial sums of money, close to $180,000 in withdrawals and deposits over a two-month period. A number of the Israelis resided for a period of time in Hollywood, Fla. — the small city where Mohammed Atta and three terrorist comrades lived for a time before Sept. 11.

Officials began dealing more aggressively with the “art students.” According to one account, some 140 Israeli nationals were detained or arrested between March 2001 and Sept. 11, 2001. Many of them were deported. According to the INS, the deportations resulted from violations of student visas that forbade the Israelis from working in the United States. (In fact, Salon has established that none of the Israelis were enrolled in the art school most of them claimed to be attending; the other college they claimed to be enrolled in does not exist.) After the Sept. 11 attacks, many more young Israelis — 60, according to one AP dispatch and other reports — were detained and deported. […]

All of the DEA reports detailing the Israeli “art student” spy ring can be found here.

A major development in this case unfolded in September of 2004, when Gerald Shea, an international corporate lawyer, submitted a detailed memorandum to the 9/11 Commission Report titled, “Israeli Surveillance of the Future Hijackers and the FBI Suspects in the September 11 Attacks and Their Failure to Give Us Adequate Warning: The Need for a Public Inquiry,” thoroughly detailing the activities of the Israeli spy rings operating in the United States prior to and on 9/11, including the fact that these spy rings were surveilling the alleged “Muslim hijackers” on 9/11.

Mr. Shea begins the memorandum:

I am an international corporate lawyer, writing to you today about a matter of public policy that is relevant to the circumstances surrounding, and our preparedness for, the catastrophic attacks on September 11, 2001. I do not know whether the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks (the “Commission”) or the Senate and House Committees on Intelligence (the “Committees”) have had the opportunity to consider these issues carefully. If
so, I hope this memorandum will be helpful. If not, I respectfully urge them, in accordance with the mandate of the Commission’s charter and in the exercise of the Committees’ responsibilities, to investigate the facts and resolve the questions presented.

I regret that this memorandum comes to the Commission after the publication of its Final Report this past July (the “Commission’s Final Report”). As will become evident, however, it has taken some time to assemble the facts from the raw data and other information set forth in available governmental and other reports and relevant documents in the public record. Moreover, and in any event, the need to examine and resolve the compelling issues presented here outweighs the mere appearance of completeness by putting a permanent end to the Commission’s work.

It is far more important, to all of us, that the Commission’s work be accurate and complete or, at the very least, that the Commission urge that these questions be explored and resolved by another panel as independent, distinguished and objective as itself. Both the Senate and
House Committees should endeavor to explore and resolve these issues as well.

Below is the Detailed Summary of Mr. Shea’s memorandum, which he submitted to the 9/11 Commission shortly after they released their final report.  The Detailed Summary begins on page 49 of the memorandum.

Set forth below is a detailed summary of the tentative conclusions reached in this memorandum, which amply illustrate the urgent need for a public inquiry into the activities of the Israeli DEA Groups and the Israeli New Jersey Group. The inquiry must include, without limitation, the examination of members of the Israel Groups and related persons; officials of the Israeli government and certain of its agencies, including Mossad; FBI suspects, agents of the DEA, the INS and the FBI; certain local law enforcement officials; agents of the CIA (in camera to the extent required); other intelligence sources cited by the public press to the extent possible; the boxes of documents and computer hard drives (referred on page 29) seized by the FBI from the Israeli New Jersey Group; and of all other relevant documents, reports, communiqués and information.–


1. The Israeli DEA Groups were spying on the Drug Enforcement Agency and thus upon the United States. The DEA itself has concluded that they were probably engaged in organized intelligence gathering on our soil.


2. A highly regarded American journal knowledgeable about Israeli affairs, has concluded (a) based on its own sources, that the Israeli DEA Groups were spying on radical Islamic networks suspected of links to Middle East terrorism, and (b) based on the representations of a former American intelligence official regularly briefed on these matters by law enforcement officials, that (i) at least two members of the Israeli New Jersey Group were Mossad operatives, (ii) Urban Moving, the company used by the Israeli New Jersey Group, was a front for Mossad and its operatives, and (iii) the Israeli New Jersey Group was spying on local Arabs.


3. The intelligence sources of a substantial American television network report that the Israeli DEA Groups may have gathered information about the September 11 attacks in advance, and not shared it with the United States. One investigator said that evidence linking the Israeli DEA Groups to such intelligence gathering was classified and could not be disclosed.


4. The Israeli DEA Groups were comprised of 125 or more Israelis operating on our soil. Their leaders and apparent associates included military commanders and experts with military backgrounds in intelligence, electronic intercepts and telecommunications.


5. The wiretapping and intelligence expertise of members of both Israeli Groups, and the use of vans in local neighborhoods where the future hijackers were planning the attacks, and the extensive use by the hijackers of cell phones and land lines, made the Israeli Groups ideally suited to gather information regarding the hijackers’ plans.


6. The principal operation of the Israeli DEA Groups was located in and around Hollywood, Florida, the central training and staging ground for the hijacking of North and South Tower Planes and the Pennsylvania Plane. The addresses and places of residence of the members of the Israeli DEA Groups in Hollywood itself were within hundreds of yards those of the future hijackers.


7. The operations of both the Israeli New Jersey Group and the hijackers of the Pentagon Plane were centered in Hudson and Bergen Counties in New Jersey, within a common radius of about six miles.


8. All five celebrating members of the Israeli New Jersey Group arrested on September 11 were aware, when the North Tower Plane struck the World Trade Center, based on their immediate reaction to the attack and the information said to be contained in their van, that the attack had been planned and carried out by Arab terrorists.


9. After being questioned by the FBI on September 11, the leader of the Israeli New Jersey Group immediately fled the United States to Israel. His name and aliases appear, along with those of the hijackers and other FBI suspects, on the May 2002 FBI Suspect list.


10. Israeli intelligence officials have reported that two senior officials of Mossad warned the United States in August 2001 that as many as 200 terrorists on American soil were planning an imminent large-scale attack on high visibility targets on the American mainland. One press report states that in August Mossad provided the CIA with the names of future hijackers Khaled al Mihdhar and Nawaf al Hazmi.


11. The CIA’s explanation of how Mihdhar’s and Hazmi’s names were placed on the Watchlist through the spontaneous efforts of CIA and FBI agents is not only difficult to follow but, as the sole reason for the Watchlisting, hardly credible.


12. Mossad’s own information appears to have come from its sources inside the United States. All of the facts and circumstances set forth in this memorandum appear to show that Mossad’s two likely sources of information were: (a) the Israeli DEA Groups, comparable in number to that of the Arab suspects and who appear to have tracked the future hijackers in their central places of operation and in other states, and (b) the Israeli New Jersey Group, operating through their Mossad front in another principal locus of operations of the future hijackers, two of whom were Mossad agents, and five of whom appeared immediately aware of the origin of the attacks on September 11.


13. While little direct evidence supports the contention that the CIA was aware of or condoned the Israeli Groups’ tracking of Arab terrorist groups in the United States prior to September 11, the CIA’s pressing for the expulsion of members of the Israeli DEA Groups when they were detained before September 11, their failure to cooperate with the FBI, their circuitous explanation of how the above two hijackers were placed on the Watchlist, and other relevant considerations require that the issue be taken up as a part of the public inquiry into these painful events.

Is there anyone anywhere on this planet that would doubt the veracity and authenticity of this memorandum submitted by Mr. Gerald Shea?  Is there any doubt that Israel was clearly involved in carrying out the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB on 9/11?  Credible sources have even alleged that the Mossad spy ring actually ran the “Arab terrorists” later blamed for the 9/11 attacks.  Based upon the information put forth by Mr. Gerald Shea, in addition to the long history of Israeli infiltration and handling of “Arab terrorist” groups, is there any doubt about the legitimacy of these claims, namely that 9/11 was a false flag operation carried out largely by Israeli intelligence, which was facilitated and covered up by criminal Zionist elements in the U.S. government, media, and private sector?

I will be on Charles Giuliani’s Truth Hertz radio program tomorrow morning for the full 2 hours to discuss this information and other related matters.  The 2 hour show begins at 5am Pacific Standard Time (will someone please call and make sure I’m up!), and should be quite interesting.  Feel free to call in at 866-841-1065 if you have any questions, comments, or constructive criticisms.

Posted in USAComments Off on The Gerald Shea Memo: the smoking gun proving Israeli involvement in 9/11?

Yet One More Glimpse into Zionist Desperation

NOVANEWS
by Gilad Atzmon

Yesterday evening Zionist ‘Hope not Hate’ declared victory in their ‘battle against Atzmon’.  “The Dean of Bradford calls for Atzmon’s invite to be withdrawn” trumpeted Nick Lowles’ headline on their official blog.

Nick Lowles (only last week exposed here as an avid  Zionist operator) declared that the  “The Dean of Bradford has added his name to the growing chorus of outrage at the decision of Raise Your Banners to invite antisemite Gilad Atzmon to perform for them in Bradford on Friday”.

Lowles was lying. He made it up. When I read the Dean’s words, it was immediately clear that his ‘statement’ was, like other Nick Lowles’ productions – just a stitching together of carefully selected sentences.

Lawless Lowles had claimed that Dean David Ison categorically ruled against myself and the coming concert but (again!) he failed to produce any document to substantiate such a claim. Lowles probably believed that, faced with the usual pressures, David Ison would turn and run for cover. .

But Lowles was mistaken. David Ison is clearly made of stronger stuff because today, the Dean was in touch with both a member of his congregation and myself  and confirmed that he has become “aware of the  controversial nature, not only of Gilad Atzmon”, but also of the statements made about Atzmon. The Dean also confirmed that he had asked those who had contacted him to provide proper evidence of anti-Semitism on the part of Mr. Atzmon, but, as he says, he “received very little, some of which I could identify as being mis-reporting out of context of the kind to which you and Mr Atzmon have drawn attention.”

The Dean also stated that the statement which he did make had been ‘removed from its context’.  He said

the statement was sent as a comment on Nick Lowles’ blog of 19th November and that if his statement is properly read, “it is apparent that it raises concerns yet it makes no allegations about what Mr Atzmon has said; not does it call for the invitation to Mr Atzmon to be withdrawn.

The Dean also confirmed to us that the headline was not his and that Mr Lowles was using the statement for his own purposes.

At 14:00 today the Dean of Bradford sent an official statement that brings this sorry saga to a close. It seems that, yet again, the Zionist campaign has been shot down in flames.  

But there’s always something to be learned from these things.  What is clear is that Nick Lowles knows no limits. Last week he falsified my words and was exposed. This week he falsified the words of a Dean of the Anglican Church. What’s he going to do next? Is he going to forge an anti-Atzmon declaration by the His Holiness the Pope or perhaps he’ll just rewrite the Magna Carta. Is there no end to Zionist deceit?

 

The Wandering Who-A Study of  avid wrmongering Sayanin- available on  Amazon.com  or Amazon.co.uk

A night of radical jazz with Gilad Atzmon and the Orient House Ensemble, Sarah Gillespie, Nizar Al Issa. 7.30pm-10.30pm, Green Room, Kala Sangam. More info

Posted in CampaignsComments Off on Yet One More Glimpse into Zionist Desperation

Harr’s Place Rabid Nazi Out Let Dirty Campaign

NOVANEWS

ISLAMOPHIC HARY’S PLACE CAMPAIGNS AGAINST PALESTINIAN SHADIA MANSOUR

BY GILAD ATZMON

After weeks of intensive campaigning against Norman Finkelstein’s, Sarah Gillepie’s  and my own freedom of expression, the rabid Zionist outlet Harry’s place is now launching a campaignagainst the Great Shadia Mansour

Apparently they are annoyed by a UK Foreign and Commonwealth ‘s Youtube video produced ahead of the 2012 Olympic Games.

It is pretty staggering that those pro-war who are advocating global wars in the name of ‘freedom of speech’ are apparently adamant opponent of such a freedom here in Britain when it doesn’t suit their  morbid Zio-centric world views.

To watch Shadia’s video:

http://youtu.be/lyTnEhRBTeI

Harry’s place is indeed the true face of Zionist collective psychosis.

 

The Wandering Who-A Study of Zionist collective psychosis – available on  Amazon.com  orAmazon.co.uk

 

Posted in CampaignsComments Off on Harr’s Place Rabid Nazi Out Let Dirty Campaign


Shoah’s pages

www.shoah.org.uk

KEEP SHOAH UP AND RUNNING

November 2011
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930