Archive | January 12th, 2012




Palestinian Centre for Human Rights

On 10 January 2009, at around 16:30, Wafa al-Radea (39) and her sister Ghada (32) were targeted by two Israeli drone missiles while walking on Haboub street, one of the main roads in Beit Lahiya. The sisters were walking during the Israeli announced hour long ceasefire, and were on their way to a clinic nearby because Wafa felt that she was close to delivering a baby. Both women were severely injured in the attack.

“When people came to help I could hear them speak but was unable to respond. They were saying that I was dead,” remembers Wafa. While Ghada was taken to hospital with severe injuries to her legs, people had covered Wafa as they thought she was dead. Eventually an ambulance brought her to a hospital where doctors carried out a caesarean section surgery in an attempt to save her baby. It was only during the surgery the doctors realized Wafa was still alive. While her son, Iyad, was born, doctors amputated Wafa’s right leg and attempted to treat her other injuries. On 12 January both sisters were transferred to a hospital in Egypt for additional medical treatment. Wafa underwent a series of operations until the end of April and then had 3 months of rehabilitation. Wafa and Ghada returned to Gaza on 29 and 27 June 2009.

Wafa vividly remembers the months she spent in Egypt. “My clearest memory of that time is the unbearable pain caused by the changing of the bandages. It took nurses 5 to 6 hours each time. I underwent many surgeries. After an operation to transplant skin from my left thigh to a lower part of my leg, nurses removed the transplanted cells by mistake when cleaning the wound. I had to undergo the same surgery again, this time taking skin from my arms. I was screaming because of the pain. My brother Walid (25) lost consciousness and was bleeding from his nose. He couldn’t bear what was happening to me. I was very angry at everyone after the operation.” Wafa’s brother Walid was with her throughout the whole period in Egypt. She didn’t see any other relatives from Gaza. “It was very difficult for them to visit me because travelling to Egypt is costly and they had to look after the children,” she says.

Wafa is the mother of 8 children: Ehab (20), Lina (19), Hani (17), Shourouq (15), Mo’taz (13), Saher (12), Jehad (9), and Iyad (3). During her time in Egypt Wafa had limited contact with her children. She says: “in the first 3 months I couldn’t speak to my children over the phone. I refused. I was unable to talk. They were waiting for me for 6 months. The children were curious to know what happened to me.”

“When I left my children I was walking and my children had not seen my wounds. The most difficult moment was when I came back with only 1 leg and many injuries. I was a different Wafa. When I came back I was supposed to be happy and the people were supposed to be happy for seeing me but everyone was crying,” Wafa recalls. “I noticed that my children watched my every move. Jehad kept following me with his eyes, watching how I went to the living room, how I sat down. He refused to go out and play with other children. He just wanted to stay with me in the home. I was very affected by the situation of my children. They are always ready to help me whenever I try to move or do anything.”

Wafa’s eldest daughters, Lina (19) and Shourouq (16) had taken care of Iyad while their mother was in hospital in Egypt. “One of them would go to school in the morning and leave Iyad with her sister. In the afternoon it was the other way around.” She continues: “when I came home they brought Iyad and put him on my lap. He was blond and beautiful and I thought he was a nephew. I couldn’t imagine that he was my son. I asked them about Iyad and they told me that he was on my lap.” Wafa takes a lot of strength from having her children around her. She says “I am very grateful and happy for having my children. They help me with everything and keep my morale high. Even when I am sad, I would smile if my children came to me. I want them to feel that I am happy because I am with them.”

Wafa finds it difficult to accept help from her children: “I always used to be the one who would help them. Before, I used to go to the school to check on the children and walk to the market to do the shopping. Now if want to go out I must use a car. And if I want to move in the house I must use a wheelchair. I also use the walkers and if Iyad wants to take my hand I cannot give him my hand because I am afraid that I will fall. I need my hands to hold the walkers.”

Wafa received one year of physiotherapy in Gaza for her back, pelvis and her left leg. Despite several attempts, so far she has no prosthetic leg. She also still undergoes treatment for her left leg. “My leg is getting better but I am still in hospital from time to time, for example when I have inflammations. One month ago I was in hospital for 6 days. In winter my wounds hurt more and I feel pain in my pelvis, back, abdomen and legs.”

Despite constantly being confronted with the past Wafa tries to focus on the future. “I hope that our children will not have to pass through similar experiences when they are older. I wish that their lives will be better. But my children keep asking me ‘will there be another war, come again and kill us all?’ They are afraid and I see how the war negatively impacted on them,” she says.

Wafa feels great frustration over how the crime against her and her sister caused so much suffering and yet goes unpunished. “It has been 3 years since they [Israel] attacked us and there is still no response. I spoke to many people from human rights organizations about my story and what is the result of it? There is no result or action whatsoever.”

PCHR submitted a criminal complaint to the Israeli authorities on behalf of Wafa al-Radea on 07 October 2009. To-date, no response has been received.

Posted in GazaComments Off on NAZI’S IN GAZA


Dear Nu’man


As I mentioned to you outside the Central Library I intended to send you a note on the December

meeting on Libya which you helped to organise.


I must say I found it one of the most ridiculous meetings I have attend for some time.


The meeting had two themes


1. Attacking the StWC’s record on Anti-War activity on Libya.


2. Complete support for the dictator Gaddifi’s repression against internal dissent including support

    for torture of the regimes critics by the main speaker Harpal Brar.


In his opening address Moeem stated the existing Anti-War movement (ie Stop the War Coalition)

had failed during th Libya campaign. How it failed was unclear.


However this was a bit much since 90% of the audience had played NO role in the six month

campaign by Birmingham StWC and the Erdington/Sutton Coldfield StWC against the bombing of

Libya. They had not been at the numerous stalls, public protests, two Bham Public meetings

(attendances of between 40 and 60) or any of the four meetings held by Erdington/Sutton Coldfield

meetings opposing the war. Moeem himself only attended one stall and successfully disrupted a

StWC public meeting nearly provoking a fight. StWC had organised active opposition to the war

which probably reached its peak when Sami Ramanadani, anti-war Iraqi exile spoke on BBC radio

at 7.45 am (a peak time) in March prior to speaking at the first Bham StWC meeting on the war.


On one point I accept your criticism which I understand from Abu that you have made about the

StWC operation. Unfortunately Dr Sami Ahmed, an Egyptian doctor who had spoken well at

previous meetings on the Egyptian revolt, supported the no-fly zone in Libya at the March Bham

StWC public meeting. The official position of the StWC was clearly stated by John Rees, a

national officer of StWC, and supported by Sami of opposing the no fly zone. Dr Sami Ahmed

had not taken this position prior to public meeting and his statement was a surprise to the

meeting organisers. You make a similar point about Hasan, a British Libyan who spoke at a

Erdington/Sutton Coldfield StWC. Again Hasa changed his position and was well answered in

the debate at the StWC meeting. However it was good we had speakers from the region 

despite the problems at times.


I said in my contribution to the discussion was that the key thing was united action against

western military threats to Syria and Iran. There was no positive reply to this.


Moeem made two suggestions, one rather bizarre for an anti-war group. The first proposed a

campaign against drones which was good, Bham StWC supported a picket on this initiated

by Bham PSC members earlier in the year. The other was a David Cameron Big Society idea

that we should visit old people in hospital. A Great idea but how this is part of building an Anti-War

movement is a complete mystery to me.


The second theme was unqualified support for the Gaddifi regime. It was said correctly that

Gaddifi coming to power produced a number of advances in terms of welfare provisions for the

Libyan people. However in recent years Gaddifi had actively collaborated with imperialism and

cooperated with MI6 and the CIA in torturing Islamic militants. No democratic freedoms existed

for the Libyan people to organise trade unions or opposition political parties and torture was

widely used to repress opposition voices.


The main speaker, Harpal Brar, at the meeting completely supported torture and said he would

like to do it to some individuals!!! What a farce!!


Stuart Richardson


Dear Stuart,

Although there are some accurate observations in your assessment below, your account of StW activity on Libya is misreprentative but you admit that StW hosted two pro NATO speakers on both StW meetings held on Libya. Furthermore, StW, if I remember correctly, held no vigils or demonstrations while the bombing was going on. These were organised by myself and Abu.

As for the discussion that went on after the meeting I am not in a position to say whether this is accurate because I had left at the end of the panelists speeches.

As for your assessment of the Gadhaffi government and as I mentioned to you last time I saw you, this is largely immaterial to what the meeting was about. The meeting was called ‘Chaos in Libya: Understanding Britain’s intervention in Libya’. Therefore the meeting was (or it should have been) about British foreign policy and not hte Gadhaffi regime.

In defence of Harpal, at least he mentioned the collusion between Islamic militants and NATO in Libya – something the StW is continually overlooking.

However, once again I wasn’t there for the discussion period so I can’t comment on what was said afterwards.



Posted in CampaignsComments Off on IS StWC’S PRO-WAR OR ANTI-WAR ?

Shoah’s pages


January 2012
« Dec   Feb »