Archive | February 13th, 2012

Palestine Soli-Dirty Campaign ” P.S.C.” Members Read “BANNED” Book


by Laura Stuart

Gilad Atzmon – A Hebrew Speaking Palestinian

O.K. I admit I mislead readers with that headline, of course Gilad’s book is not banned, what it should have read was P.S.C. members who read books “we” don’t like should be banned.

Wait a minute, let me put that more clearly; the book should be banned, the people who read it should be banned and probably the P.S.C. should be banned as well.

This is “the word” according to Anthony Cooper.

Palestine Solidarity Campaign members are holding a book reading circle in Brighton. This seemingly innocent and gentle pastime is causing outrage to Anthony Cooper someone whom I know little about except that he appears to be some kind of Gestapo inspired thought police, he certainly spends a lot of time cyber stalking P.S.C. members and what they do in their spare time.

The P.S.C. made a huge error of judgement when they started trying to appease Zionist and so called Anti Zionist bullies, who knows where this McCarthy like hunt for  alleged anti Semites (people that Jews don’t like) might end.

So long as its members are happy to join Holocaust deniers to study racist books, the PSC shouldn’t expect reasonable people to take their words seriously.

Evidently “reasonable people” think you should only read books which meet with their approval, no matter that we have laws in the U.K. against racism which would ensure “racist books” were banned.  “The Wandering Who” by Gilad Atzmon is endorsed by a long list of humanists headed by no less than John Mearsheimer and Richard Falk. Of course Anthony Cooper and Tony Greenstein have a lot in common in so much as they both like to perpetuate the lie that Gilad Atzmon is a holocaust denier, which he is not.

It would be nice to see the P.S.C. finally join the resistance and become a real solidarity movement, then we really would be able to take them seriously.


Posted in CampaignsComments Off on Palestine Soli-Dirty Campaign ” P.S.C.” Members Read “BANNED” Book



exCOMMUNICATIONs Part 1: Francis Clark-Lowes

by Roy Bard

Palestine Solidarity Campaign (logo).jpg

Ed by Shoah



This is the interview I recorded with Francis on the day of the PSC AGM, immediately after his expulsion had been confirmed in what I consider to have been an extremely unfair hearing. Francis was given 5 minutes to defend himself, after which PSC Chair Hugh Lanning gave the case against. Compared to the trial where David Irving was declared anti-semitic, racist and a holocaust denier, the process was atrocious. And there are many important issues raised by this matter which should really be addressed and considered over time, in regards to what solidarity for the Palestinians means, and what priorities we  should adopt as solidarity activists.

The interview took pace in a coffee shop which was noisy at times, and I have done some minimal editing, but do feel that it is an accurate record of the conversation and may help some understand Francis a bit more.

Francis has asked that I add the statement below:

‘The day Roy Bard interviewed me I had appealed unsuccessfully against my expulsion in May 2011 from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Subsequently a transcript of the speech made by Hugh Lanning, on behalf of the Executive Committee of PSC, has surfaced, and this sheds light on aspects of what he said which, in the heat of the moment, I had failed to register.

Although he declares that ‘our campaign is based on justice, human rights and international law,’ among which, presumably, is the right to free thought and speech, he states that ‘Holocaust denial with a big or a little “H” is racist and anti-Semitic.’

But can it really be immoral to question our view of a period of history? There is a problem with the expression ‘Holocaust Denial’ which my original ‘error’ (saying I was proud to call myself a Holocaust denier) was intended to expose. If I deny that the world is flat, I do so not because I happen to have travelled round the world, and never reached its edge, but because scientists all insist the world is round. In other words I trust them.

I don’t trust the people who have told us about the ‘Holocaust’, partly because I have looked at, and listened to, some of the counter-evidence, but largely because I believe the circumstances in which that story grew up and was nurtured make it certain that it has been distorted. The question is only about how much. In other words I am a revisionist. But if people insist on calling you a “Holocaust denier” you eventually come to the point of saying: “Ok, what if I am?”

I put my position to a sceptic like this: “If I had to bet on it, I would put good money on ‘the Holocaust’, as we know it – that is the 6 million figure (give or take a million), the gas chambers and the systematic plan for the extermination of Jews – didn’t happen.’ Of course, I might lose that bet (assuming we had all the evidence we needed). But I might also win it. This is a question of judgement, not of sin.

In the two weeks since that fateful day I have been much encouraged by the support I have received, some of it confidential as people are naturally scared of the consequences of speaking openly. I believe a shift of consciousness is coming. The protection of the ‘Holocaust’ narrative is indicative of a much wider problem, the taboo on talking about the Jewish dimension in the Israel-Palestine conflict, and particularly the Jewish dimension in Palestine solidarity movements.’


In Defense of Iran



 by  Sami Jamil Jadallah


What chutzpah, what hypocrisy! Israel with over 400 nuclear devices, with submarines that carry nuclear tipped missiles and intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching Washington DC! Israel, at war since before its founding has attacked its neighbors near and far, all the way from Tunisia to Iraq.

It has even attacked its own ally, killing 34 US sailors. Israel, the same country that used depleted uranium, phosphorous and cluster bombs in its wars against civilian targets in Lebanon and Gaza, is worried about Iran’s “nuclear intentions.” This must be a sick joke.

Possibly even more worrisome than Israel, is the total hypocrisy of the so-called ‘international community,’ as is the reference given to the US and certain European allies that sponsor every Israeli position.

It is even willing to take the world to an absolute disaster: a war against Iran based on unsubstantiated claims of its “nuclear intentions” –a war led by none other than Israel (again, a country with upwards of 400 nuclear devices), the country that has never signed the Nuclear non-proliferation treaty (Iran, by the way, is a signatory).

I must admit that I do think the Islamic Republic of Iran has an absolute right to nuclear energy whether civilian or not, however, I also think it is unwise, if not stupid and reckless, not to mention a waste of time and money for Iran or for any country to pursue nuclear weapons programs.

Israel’s nuclear arsenal will not do it any good, just like Soviet Union’s nuclear bombs did not do it any good.

On 5 October 1986, the British newspaper The Sunday Times ran Mordechai Vanunu’s story on its front page under the headline: “Revealed: the secrets of Israel’s nuclear arsenal”

I am not a fan of the current regime in Tehran, though I did celebrate the humiliating exiles of the Shah and the return of Khomeini. However Khomeini ended up a big disappointment for me.

He proved to be a very vindictive man full of hate and anger, not the pious man one might expect and hope for. Khomeini in fact, ended up no different than the angry rabbis of Israel.

Of course, the Islamic Revolution in Iran did not sit well with either the US or Israel, who were prime supporters and sponsors of the Shah regime. Khomeini unfortunately set out to lose the support of the hundreds of millions of Muslims in the streets.

His indifference, perhaps an encouragement for the US Embassy siege was a stupid, criminal and careless undertaking that handicapped the Islamic Revolution. Khomeini’s ruthless murder of those who stood by him and sponsored his return was something never to be forgiven.

Of course the US was ready with its own plans to teach Khomeini and the young Islamic regime a lesson. Saddam Hussein, humiliated a number of times by the late Shah, was ready to serve an angry Reagan administration. Saddam waged his proxy war, one that lasted 8 years, with over two million casualties and hundreds of billions in “Arab” money wasted on America’s agenda against Iran.

Those wasted billions could have done wonders for the development of the Arab world from Morocco to Bahrain, and from Syria to Yemen. Saddam, Khamenei, and Arab regimes all were guilty of being a part of this proxy war against the new Islamic Republic of Iran.

Rather than creating and developing a model of what a modern Islamic state might be, where the people are source of power and authority—a state that might have set a tone for freedom and democracy in the Arab and Muslim world, the mullahs of the Islamic Republic of Iran had other ideas.

They wanted to create a “Muslim Papal State” with a Khomeini and Khamenei as the Muslim Pope and the Mullahs as “College of Cardinals” ruling as the “Princes of the Church/Mosque”. Wilayat Al-Faqih is no different from the Vatican—they wanted a theocratic state not a people’s state. A state with the infallibility of the Supreme leader enshrined into law…that is too much to take.

Israeli Submarine

Iran’s interest in nuclear power is not new. It was there way back in the 50s to the time of the late Shah when the US, France, and even Israel were all too happy to provide the Shah with support for his nuclear energy plans.

The Israelis even developed the security plans for Iran nuclear plants. I am sure if Iran were to establish a diplomatic relationship with Israel all of these threats against it would be forgotten.

An “Islamic” republic run by Mullhas is deemed untrustworthy… meanwhile; somehow a Zionist Jewish Israel is completely trusted…what hypocrisy!

Iran, in modern times, did not invade any of its neighbors, did not initiate wars, does not occupy other people’s land is somehow deemed untrustworthy and criminal by the ‘international community.’

Meanwhile, Israel, a country constantly at war, with a leadership sanctions indiscriminate attacks by its military—a country with rabbis who legitimize the murder of non-Jews, is deemed trustworthy!

Well, I guess a country with a stockpile of over 400 nukes and angry racist leadership is quite ok…as long as it is Jewish.

In law, the burden of proof lies on the state to prove guilt, and not on the accused to prove innocence. What I fail to understand are the demands by Israel, the US, France, Germany, England and the IAEA for Iran to ‘come clean’ with its nuclear program.

Israel, with support from the US has already engaged in targeted assassination of nuclear scientist identified by IAEA.

What exactly do Israel, the US, France, Germany, the UK and the IAEA want from Iran?

If the US gives Israel the “green light,” to attack Iran, it is Americans allied in the Gulf , mainly in the Gulf, that will suffer the greatest loss.

In fact, if the US sanctions an attack on Iran, it might as well write a death warrant for the entire Arab Gulf region, including Iraq.

The Gulf States—the best US allies in the region, much more loyal than Israel—would go up in flames, and lose trillions in investments, infrastructure and development.

My question is: When will the time come for Israel to stop holding the US and the rest of the world hostage?

Posted in IranComments Off on In Defense of Iran

Syria is Not Tunisia or Libya


Inside the nation, even people who support regime change tend to oppose sanctions, military solutions and foreign intervention.


by Sharmine Narwani


Commentators on the Arab Awakening sometimes make the mistake of assuming that 22 Arab states are one and the same, all destined to oust dictators with the same sequence of events that follow either the Tunisian or Libyan models.

While President Bashar al-Assad has made some gross miscalculations since the crisis began in March, he is still favored by a slight majority of Syrians, according to recent online polls. But popularity is not why his government remains intact. The regime still enjoys the support of its key constituencies: the army, the major cities, the business/regime elite, minorities and Sunni secularists, with limited defections of the sort experienced by other Arab states.

Inside the nation, even people who support regime change tend to oppose sanctions, military solutions and foreign intervention.

On the flip side, after 11 months, the opposition still remains fundamentally divided along ethnic, religious, political and geographic lines, and is unable to articulate a detailed political platform. Furthermore, the armed opposition groups – brought to light in the recent Arab League mission report – lack a central command, are locally based, and have limited, irregular access to the military supply lines essential for operating on a larger scale.

Also, external parties have very little leverage in Syria. The country has adapted to living under sanctions and has a small but cohesive group of allies on which it relies. It functions largely without the web of dependencies typical of other Arab states, does not have a national debt problem, and has recently gained a valuable buffer from the BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India and China), which insist on Syria resolving its crisis internally.

The view from inside Syria, meanwhile, varies starkly from the narratives spun outside. A closer look at the U.N. death toll of 5,000 shows a critical lack of discernment between pro-regime and opposition casualties, and fails to highlight the 2,000 dead regular soldiers whose funerals are televised daily within the country. In contrast to external opposition figures, mainstream domestic ones — even those who seek regime change — tend to reject sanctions, military solutions and foreign intervention in favor of a peaceful political resolution of the crisis

If Assad delivers a new constitution and national elections by the summer, it may be all the space he needs to confound his critics. Increased militarization and sectarianism are likely to cement opinions rather than fragment: People may yearn not so much for bread, but for the ability to walk to the market and buy it.

Sharmine Narwani, a writer and political analyst covering the Middle East, is a senior associate at St. Antony’s College, Oxford University.

Source: Room for Debate


Also see:


Webster Tarpley interviewed on Syrian television


Posted in SyriaComments Off on Syria is Not Tunisia or Libya

The Global March to Jerusalem, the 36th Land Day and IMAGINE Revolution


The Global March to Jerusalem/GMJ commences on 30 March and coincides with the 36th anniversary of LAND DAY.


by Eileen Fleming


As “reality leaves much to the imagination” [John Lennon] I imagine the third intifada could finally erupt if those two events were joined into from every city, town and village throughout Israel by contingents of nonviolent residents who would pitch tents in nonviolent solidarity as global citizens of conscience amass on the borders of Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria and all uphold The document of Principles “The Freedom Call” which ascertains the significance of Jerusalem politically, culturally and religiously to all Palestinian people and the global community.

The Global March to Jerusalem’s Declaration of Principles underscores that the GMJ does not represent any one faction or political party but calls for participation from all social forces, political factions and ideologies to respond to the call for justice united in a peaceful movement that steadfastly refutes the use of violence to achieve goals.

The eyes of the world will view Israel’s response but when the eyes of the leaders of the world see the right of the Palestinian People to liberate their land and live in freedom and dignity; the holy city of Jerusalem could be a City of Peace and the Holy Land could be whole indeed.

But, for that imagination to even approach reality we must know, honor and learn from history.

The GMJ aims to rattle the conscience of the world and seeks “to end the Zionist policies of apartheid, ethnic cleansing and Judaisation, which all harm the people, land and sanctity of Jerusalem…

“The march will unite the efforts of Palestinians, Arabs, Muslims, Christians, Jews, and all citizens of conscience in the world to put an end to Israel’s disregard for international law through the continuing occupation of Jerusalem and the rest of Palestinian land…

“Our plan is to organize massive marches towards Jerusalem, or to the nearest point possible according to the circumstances of each country, in Palestine (the 1948 seizures, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip) and the four neighbouring countries: Jordan, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon…In addition, mass protests will be organized in front of Israeli embassies in the capitals of different countries, or in the main public squares in the big cities of the world.

“The recent successes of the Egyptian and Tunisian revolutions are a reminder that this inspirational movement for nonviolent civil resistance was actually born in Palestine with the first Intifada. By renewing the struggle to liberate Palestine through a peaceful national mass movement that is supported by the global community, we aim to change the nature of the confrontation by compelling the occupiers to face millions of demonstrators demanding Freedom for Palestine and its capital Jerusalem.” [1]



LAND DAY commemorates the killing of six Palestinians, wounding of 96 and arrests of 300 on 30 March 1976, when Israeli forces reacted with violence to a spontaneous peaceful demonstration by Palestinians over the confiscation of 5,500 acres of their land which Israel had classified as “closed military zones” for “security and settlement purposes.”

My Land Day Experience:

On Land Day in 2006, just after the break of dawn, a group of Israeli Jews and I traveled three hours north of west Jerusalem to the lower Galilee municipality of Sakhnin, an Arab village whose land continues to be grabbed and colonized by settlers.

Ronnie, was a Canadian who moved to Israel with a desire to help build a civil society and she co-founded Women in Black and was active with Machsom Watch, who are women at the checkpoints who watch for and report on human rights abuses. She laughed when she told me, “A friend said that I am so Left that if I ever gets to heaven I will probably argue with God that those in hell just didn’t get a fair deal.”

Ronnie turned serious and continued, “Religion is used as a cover, but it’s all about the land! It’s convenient to claim one is doing something for God but the laws are made to take the land. We don’t have settlers in Israel -the common name for illegal colonists in the West Bank-we just take it! First it is claimed to be for military reasons then it’ll become a park or agricultural land that the state has confiscated.

“The Palestinians who did not leave in ’48 but remained here still have lost their land. They can’t get permits to build…

“I am opposed to the occupation and as an Israeli Jew I want to see justice for all and I refuse to be enemies with anyone.”
Over 100 Israeli’s, Arab Christians, Muslims, atheists, communists and internationals attended a tour of Sakhnin and conference coordinated by Batshalom and The Women’s Coalition for Peace and Justice.

I learned that not only had Israel confiscated acres of the most fertile of Palestinian land they had also placed land mines all over the land. Many farmers and other innocent ones lost their lives or legs, so people quit caring for their groves and the Israeli government declared the village of Sakhnin a military zone.

A few years prior, the President of Israel had declared that the people of Sakhnin, deserved to have their land back. But the Israeli county of Misgav, abetted by the Israeli Land Authority continued to collect taxes from the indigenous people but not return any land or issue permits for Palestinians to build upon their legally owned property.

An Israeli peace activist commented, “In 2000 during Land Day, hundred’s of nonviolent protesters were arrested and we were hit with tear gas and rubber bullets. Name it and we have had it!”

Another told me, “I am an Israeli Jew and I am responsible to change something about this situation. We all need to do this together.”

The speakers spoke in Arabic or Hebrew, and my interpreter was Aliyah [Hebrew for “Go Up”], who was born in St. Louis, grew up in Cleveland and moved to Israel in 1948.

She told me, “My Father was born in Jerusalem and I was a Zionist, but now I am not so sure. I still want the Jewish people to have a state but it must be honest and moral, I don’t want a piranha state! Before 1967 I was euphoric! My husband and I began to learn that there were Israelis who you could call prophets, who said we must return the land and make peace. Then a fundamentalist Jewish group, The Gush Emunim began erecting the settlements in the newly possessed land.

“When Israel went into Lebanon I was infuriated! I demonstrated against the massacres at Shatila and Shabra. Eighteen years of Israel in Lebanon is what built up the Hezbollah! The Israelis supported the group at first because they hoped the Hezbollah would be against the Palestinian refugees in South Lebanon.”

I inquired, “Isn’t that what Israel did with Hamas? Didn’t they originally support Hamas to be a wedge against the PLO?”

Aliyah replied, “Yes, stupidity repeats itself!”

In the Northern part of Israel 53% of the population are Jews who control 80% of the land. Palestinians are 47% of the population with only 20% of the land.

Sakhnin’s 25,000 people are allowed to access less than 10,000 dunums of their land but they only control half of that. In 1948 they owned and controlled 170,000 dunums. A Defense Industry and Army base complex a few miles from where we stood was also home to a mysterious warehouse.

Aliyah remarked, “No one knows what is going on inside, but it may be a nuclear reactor. The municipality asked the army to develop in another direction for there is a school over there too. The Israelis are allowed to expand anywhere, but the people of Sakhnin are not allowed permits to builds on their own land.

“I really became aware of what was going on in the ’80′s. I had been invited to a meeting of The Bridge for Peace and Coexistence, which is a group of Arab and Jewish activists. A man asked me where I was living and when I answered Bneitz-ion. He calmly and politely told me ‘That is my Uncle’s land.’”
Since 1967 Israel has confiscated more than 750,000 acres of land from the 1.5 million acres that comprise the West Bank and Gaza. Most of the land has been confiscated to make space for settlement expansion and bypass roads that are for the exclusive use of Israeli only colonists.

Since 1948, Israel has confiscated nearly 85 percent of the territory within the Green Line from Palestinians. Most of this land was taken from the 750,000 Palestinian’s who were made refugees when they were evicted or fled in fear during the 1948 war.

The Israeli Knesset has passed dozens of laws in defiance of U.N. Resolutions and International Law, such as The Absentee Property law and the Development Authority (Transfer of Property) Law.

That law in Arabic is called ‘Qanoon Elhader/Gayeb’, and was adopted in March 1950. It classifies anyone who was a citizen or resident of one of the Arab states or a Palestinian citizen on November 29, 1947, but had left his place of residence-even to take refuge within Palestine- as an ‘absentee’. Absentee property was vested in the Custodian of Absentee Property who then ‘sold’ it to the Development Authority.

This effectively authorized the theft of the property of a million Arabs, seized by Israel in 1948.

Adopted in July 1950, this law was devised as a legal ploy to shield the Israeli government from the accusation that it had confiscated abandoned property.

The Development Authority is an independent body empowered to sell, buy, lease, exchange, repair, build, develop and cultivate Palestinian property and none of these transactions can take place without a Jew or a Jewish entity!
United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 clearly asserts that the “occupying power cannot move segments of its own population to parts of the land it occupies,” or make any demographic or territorial changes that are not in the interest of the occupied.

Furthermore, provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention have unquestionably condemned Israel’s settlement activities and demanded the ceasing of “all” settlement expansion by Israel.
In 1990, UN Security Council Resolution 681 confirmed that the Forth Geneva Convention is applicable to the Occupied Territories and thus Israel’s compliance is mandatory.

In 2005, the Israeli separation wall was deemed illegal by the International Court of Justice and described in a UN report as a “creeping annexation” with confiscation of the most fertile of Palestinian land and water sources. Israel has effectively “wiped Palestine off the map” by ethnically cleansing the indigenous population from over 500 villages.

Israel calls ‘independence’ what Palestinians call Nakba, which translates to catastrophe, and it created over 700,000 refugees in 1948 who are still denied the right to return to their homeland.

The Nakba continues due to USA policy that favors and shields Israel like no other state in the world.
Read more…

The leaders of the international community led by US policies and pressure have turned a blind eye to more than 6 million people whose basic human rights have been denied for over six decades.

Israel’s illegal settlement expansion and land confiscation continues unabated because of US vetoes in the UN and an ‘occupied’ Congress.

In 2011, Congress remained mute when Israel outlawed commemorations of Nakba and began punishing their citizens who support Boycott, Divestment from and Sanctions on Israel until Israel ends the occupation of the indigenous people.

The Jewish people have a long history of oppression and the tenants of Judaism are rooted in social justice issues.

America was founded by agitators, rebels and dissidents who essentially told the King of England to back off this land.

When the Governments of America and Israel bridge the gulfs that separates their actions from democratic ideals; and when politicians uphold equal human rights for all people; a just peace- which is the only way to security could reign in the region-but that requires enormous political and good will.

Decades of creative nonviolent resistance to the evil of injustices inflicted by government policies and ideologies of superiority have led to this 30th of March.

When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace. –Jimi Hendrix

And the power of the peace-full is a force that NO government forces can put down.

Common Sense calls for an End to the Occupation and Equal Human Rights for All.

I am Eileen Fleming for US HOUSE of Representatives and I approve of this message!

Posted in Palestine Affairs1 Comment

The Golem, by Michael Collins Piper; Read Before Bombing

by Tom Valentine


Piper is truly amazing. Those of us who know him and have worked with him know the secret of his insightful writings.

Mike has a photo memory and speed-reads with comprehension, which allows him to seriously support whatever it is he needs to document a topic.

Though I had 20 years of close association with the author at Liberty Lobby, and greatly admired his definitive book on the assassination of JFK ”Final Judgement,” I had not read this astounding work until recently.

I was amazed at his recollection of details about the Zionist lobby’s treatment of both Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton in this book. Details that are entirely germane to the hot button issue of our day—Nuke warfare and proposed war with Iran.

The subheads on this paperback’s cover are: “ Israel’s Nuclear Hell bomb and the road to global Armaggedon; A study of the “Israelization” of American Foreign Policy and its implications for the survival of mankind.”

There is more recent history packed into this pithy straightforward writing than you will find on shelves in university libraries, and more historical data on Jewish fantasies than you ever imagined.

The concept of the Golem is actually the basis for the Super Heroes of comic strips, video games and today’s boring “action” films.

No other writer has interpreted the seminal exposure of the Talmudic chutzpah by the great Israel Shahak as lucidly as has Mike.

Not only does this book clearly outline the Talmudic fanaticism of the Israeli fundamentalists it documents every allegation made against the pervasive Jewish Lobby and it’s stranglehold on our government and media.

A list of the chapter headings should whet sharp appetites:

Introduction—What is the Golem?

  • Chapter one—Israel’s institutionalized racism & Nuclear Dangers

  • Chapter two—The rise of fanaticism in Israel and its nuclear context

  • Chapter three—Civil Instability in Israel and its consequences

  • Chapter Four—Israel’s mainstream leaders ponder Nuclear war

  • Chapter Five—Israel’s attack on an ally: The USS liberty affair

  • Chapter six—Israel, instigator of Middle East nuclear proliferation

  • Chapter Seven—US tax exempt orgs. bankroll Israel’s Golem

  • Chapter eight—The US-Israel “merger”

  • Chapter Nine—US army analysts tell Israel to give up its Golem

  • Chapter ten— The “poisonous relationship” needs to be reassessed

  • Chapter eleven— The US-Israel-India Nuclear Axis

  • Chapter twelve—JFK’s secret war with Israel over Nuke weapons

  • Chapter thirteen—Jimmy Carter’s “Jewish Problem

  • Chapter fourteen—Hillary Clinton was right: Bill & Monica

  • Chapter fifteen—The revolt of the generals

  • Chapter sixteen—Zionist lobby calls for witch hunt

  • Chapter seventeen—The revolt of the academics

  • Chapter eighteen—Zionism’s war against the United States

  • Chapter nineteen—Targeting Iraq and Iran; long-term strategy

  • Chapter twenty—Israel chief beneficiary of Iraq war

  • Chapter twenty one—“Indelible Jewish fingerprints on Iran war

  • Chapter twenty two—Iraq war architects aim at Iran

  • Chapter twenty three—New York Money wants war with Iran

  • Chapter twenty four—Nuclear controversy made in Israel

  • Chapter twenty five—Iran’s pres. challenges New World Order

  • Chapter twenty six—Dr. Mahathir Mohammed: “Time to wage war against war

  • Chapter twenty seven—failed state willing to break nuclear taboo

  • Chapter twenty eight—The end of life on Earth

  • Chapter twenty nine— the media’s Institutionalized disinformation

  • Chapter thirty—Lawrence Dennis recalled: Crime of the century

  • Conclusion—The Israelization of American Foreign policy

Mike visited Iran, and hobnobbed with Ahmadinejad among other Persian Muslims; he came away with this sage advice found on page 134 of the book:”Americans need to ignore anything and everything they hear about modern day Iran, its leader, its culture, and its people from the mass media in America.

To me the biggest problem for this book is getting brainwashed Americans and smartass pundits to read it. It’s fantasy, of course, but I daydream of teaching a class with Hannity, Limbaugh, O’Reilly and Matthews in it and having an oral exam on the contents of this book.

That is a fantasy most satisfying.

Posted in LiteratureComments Off on The Golem, by Michael Collins Piper; Read Before Bombing

Citizens United – How America Became Third World


The Insanity of Corporation “Personhood” Barely Touches It

by  Gordon Duff, Senior Editor


With all the blithering about a constitution few have read and fewer understand, it is time that a few things were admitted. 

The constitution guaranteed slavery, no vote for women, an appointed Senate, came out with NO bill of rights and was never meant to last more than 20 years.

Jefferson’s flowery language also fails to dispel his prediction that it would take a second revolution for America to become democratic.

When that revolution came, when the South quit its enslavement to the London banking system that ran the North, it was crushed.

There was nothing in the constitution that said that a state couldn’t secede from the union, quite the opposite. Secession is a power retained by the states, one each state still has and more should consider using.

Currently, there are no effective constitutional protections of individual rights, nothing protecting our freedoms, no trace of the original intent of the constitution left. The document is an empty shell, defended by no one, no oath kept, no right defended, no tyrant but rewarded and enriched.

Crossing the line from being unhappy about things – to fighting back, seriously

In all honesty, we might as well change the name of the country itself, the current use of “the United States of America,” is a dishonor to those who have sacrificed for something that not only doesn’t exist, but that talking too openly of, teaching the real history of, may well be considered a crime. The biggest reasons are recent ones.

America has forgotten the values it sought but never fulfilled. Rights were gained by some for a while, women got the vote, African Americans have been allowed some rights when convenient while indigenous peoples, actually numbered in untold millions, were robbed and slaughtered.

The Original Boss – Before Springsteen

America spent most of its history at the hands of urban political fiefdoms and state governments under the control of the armed thugs of the wealthy.

Individual rights, for all of America’s history have been traditionally trampled with few exceptions, names lost in our past like “Miranda.”

Central to the phony idea of a republic that never existed and a democracy never attempted has been the Supreme Court of the United States.

At any given time, big business or some foreign banking concern only had to buy or threaten five people to control the United States.

Once they did, the people meant nothing as was made obvious during the 2000 election when a runaway court appointed a loser president while with the help of armed thugs.

This was a coup d’etat by the worst legal minds, most obvious criminal group in American history.

Then came “Citizens United.” This was a Supreme Court decision that makes a corporation a person in the area of political donations.

Prior to this, only residents of congressional districts could donate money, a limited amount, and it was listed.  Corporations are invisible, you are not allowed to know who or what they are.

More than this, political donations are considered, not only “free speech” but “protected speech.”  Thus, with billions coming into the US, asking who donates is now against US law though required by UN convention. 

America withdrew from the ICC, International Criminal Court when Bush faced indictment.  We have now withdrawn from the UN Convention on Money Laundering so that drug profits are now “redefined” as “protected speech.”

America has its own laws on money laundering, enforced very selectively, but congress and our government, as with other civil and criminal codes, built a “Chinese wall” around themselves.

The issue of “insider trading,” as brought up during the State of the Union Address, is similar.  There is “law” and there is “lawless government.”  America has and continues to allow itself to have a lawless government. How has that worked out for us?

“Still Stealing After All These Years” – a la Simon and Garfunkle

Billions of dollars, nobody knows where or who and never has one question been asked or can ask, pays off our crooked politicians.  This is the money that bought America.

Bush was made president under the guise of “equal rights.”  What the court did was erase Florida and engineer a takeover which became the most disastrous period in world history since the killing off of the dinosaurs.

America has been ruled by organized crime every since with money, now entirely counterfeit and even imaginary, flowing into the hands of a tiny group that dances the court and their legislative cohorts around like the puppets they are.

Citizens United.  What does it mean?

To the court, it means a corporation, a single piece of paper, representing anything from an automobile company to a drug gang, can now legally buy any political office from a school board to a local sheriff to the presidency.

It overturns all campaign laws, it overrules all state and local laws and to those who understand such things, it erases all laws allowing prosecution of corrupt officials. On a worldwide scale, it legalizes money laundering. 

If a drug cartel forms a corporation, all they have to do is open a bank account in the Cayman Islands, and they may send unlimited drug profits to any politician they choose and it is illegal to investigate the source of the money, the ownership of the corporation or even what the politician does because of the bribe received.

I will let you guess how many of them have done this.

Even Mitt Romney Enjoys the Caymans

All laws meant to guarantee local control of government, accountability, laws meant to exclude gangsterism and bribery were overturned, not just at local level but it placed the United States outside the United Nations Convention on Money Laundering.

Holocaust paintings can be sold and the money given to politicians.  Complaining about it or trying to seek criminal or civil remedy is blocked by federal rulings.

If the money goes to or “through” a politician or a Political Action Committee and billions of dollars do, Supreme Court rulings guaranteeing what they call “free and protected speech” prevents investigation, stops any litigation and prevents the rule of law.

“Citizens United” ended the rule of law in the United States.

It is not necessary for a corporation to have a single officer, director, employee or stockholder that is an American citizen to qualify for defacto “citizenship” under this ruling.

Any terror group, any dictator, as long as they spend $35 filing corporate documents that are not subject to any verification or regulation, can send billions to a candidate for, let’s say, sheriff on a key area on the US/Mexico border.

State governorships are bought and sold like candy bars.

This law has allowed, according to some federal law enforcement officials, for up to 30% of elected officials in the US to fall under the influence of groups tied to drug dealing and terrorism.

Bugsy Siegel – Before the One They Have Now

This year, a reputed Vegas crime boss claims he can use his billions to buy the presidency and personally order an invasion of Iran and a possible nuclear first strike on Russia and China.

Two presidential candidates belonging to the Republican party have entered into negotiations, each offered an initial payment of $100,000,000 with more to come if they agree to his terms.

Another “media mogul” wishes to wiretap congress and take over operations of the FBI to be used for his personal purposes.  The same individual had taken over Scotland Yard in Britain, blackmailed two prime ministers and harassed the families of war dead.

This person may well spend as much as his Las Vegas counterpart.  His real goal, we have discovered, is also a nuclear war with the eventual victim very likely the United States.

On February 14, 2012, Steven Rosen, former head of the Rand Corporation, former member of the National Security Council and employee of the American, Israeli Political Action Committee will present evidence that secrets, which include nuclear weapons and guided missiles, were passed through Israel to China, Russia and India.

Long range guided missiles built with American technology, each topped with up to eight warheads each  five megaton hydrogen bombs of American design, will stand aimed at the United States by two nations thought of as American allies, to be used at a “time of convenience.”

Proof these weapons have existed has been around for months.  Threats have been made against, not only the US but Western Europe. Both nations receive, not only financial assistance from the United States but military help as well but stand ready to attack America with a minimum of 150 million dead.

The Lady Knows

This is one of America’s biggest national secrets, with everyone attempting to turn over documents either killed, indicted or in hiding.  Personal, face to face, conversations with a national intelligence chief assure me that the American Secretary of State is aware and has seen proofs.

I have spoken to witnesses of document handovers, all recorded by the FBI.

You see, the “unthinkable,” a world nuclear war, especially after the Fukajima disaster and with the design of new “low residual radiation weapons” makes the nuclear war, known as the “Kissinger policy,” not only possible but inevitable.

It also makes it possible for nations like Israel or India, with space programs and large, if not huge, nuclear arsenals, to be “five minute superpowers.”

Is the “Iron Dome” defense system built for Israel, one the United States does not have, meant to defend them from Iran or the United States?

With a government controlled by organized crime, with a military divided, an Army with many willing to see America die under as extolled in the blatherings of former general Boykin or theDominionists who stole nuclear weapons from Minot Air Force Base, is there anyone reliable left to protect America at all?

Can Battle Groups Survive Swarms of Mach 2 Nuclear Missiles?

America has never been weaker,  with eleven carrier battle groups to confront China for Taiwan while America admits defeat by the Taliban and flees Central Asia.

No American government would make such decisions, no American government would allow such abuses, no America would allow itself to be dishonored unless, of course, all news was controlled, all elections rigged and the government paralyzed by five petty criminals in robes appointed by chief executives who are best described as Mafia Dons.

The next enemy that defeats the United States will use spears and rocks.

[Editors Note: Gordon knows a bit about this personally, as supply problems during his year in Vietnam on constant patrol found him and his squad having to beat people to death with rocks….JD]

Unseen HBO investigative report on America’s rigged elections:

YouTube –


Posted in USAComments Off on Citizens United – How America Became Third World

Is America a Police State?


by Sherwood Ross


You know you live in a police state when the president allows the military to continuously harass a prisoner against whom no crime has been proven by interrupting him every five minutes of the day to ask him, “Are you okay?” and forces him to stand to attention naked at roll call. What it can do to one man it can do to every man.

You know you live in a police state when said prisoner is barred from exercising in his cell and told where he may and may not put his hands when he goes to sleep at night. Only a police state would dictate how an individual can sleep.

You know you live in a police state when the government punishes, rather than honors, whistle-blowers who reveal its crimes such as the U.S. massacre of civilians in Baghdad that PFC Bradley Manning exposed.

You know you live in a police state when wardens force pregnant women prisoners to deliver their babies while in chains. (Not exactly “the new birth of freedom” of which Abraham Lincoln spoke.)

You know you live in a police state when the president orders the assassination (i.e., murder) of American citizens without bothering to arrest them and bring them to trial.

You know you live in a police state when police forces across the country attack unarmed and non-violent citizen protesters with pepper spray and clubs.

You know you live in a police state when hundreds of thousands of citizens are rotting in prisons for victimless “crimes” such as smoking pot and your country leads the world in incarcerations with 2.3 million behind bars and when hundreds of thousands of these prisoners are sexually assaulted.

You know you live in a police state when working people who say overwhelmingly that they want to join a union cannot do so for fear of being fired, and in which the money earned by the poor is taken by the state and given to the rich. If the government can rob one person, it can rob every person.

You know you live in a police state when your government makes terrible, punishing wars on small countries after falsely accusing them of having a “weapon of mass destruction” while it possesses tens of thousands of them.

You know you live in a police state when the president signs into law an Act allowing him to arrest innocent citizens on his say-so and have the military imprison them indefinitely without charge,  legal counsel, or trial before a jury of their peers.

You know you live in a police state when you can be barred from flying in an airliner on suspicion of “terrorism” that has not been proven and which is impossible for you to challenge.

You know you live in a police state when you are under surveillance by Federal agencies such as the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and the Central Intelligence Agency, among others, for your political views rather than the commission of any crime against the state, and when said agencies can access your medical records, bank statements, and “private” papers, tap your telephone, question your neighbors and employer and follow you around.

You know you live in a police state when the military gets the biggest percentage of your tax dollars so that it can spend as much for war as the next 20 nations combined while claiming it is attacking other countries in the name of peace and order.

You know you live in a police state when the Pentagon has more than a trillion dollars in research projects underway to make sophisticated killing machines that will give it control of the entire planet from 2,000 military bases and outer space and to terrify the world with its arsenals of nuclear weapons and germ warfare.

You know you live in a police state when people write to you to commend you for your “courage” for writing critically against the government when, in fact, you should have every good reason to live in
fear of so doing.


Related Posts:

Posted in USAComments Off on Is America a Police State?

Will This Get Me Sent To Guantanamo?

What Horrors Lurk Under the Dome?

A driver was stuck in a traffic jam on the Washington DC beltway.

Nothing was moving.

Suddenly, a man knocks on the window.

The driver rolls down the window and asks,

“What’s going on?”

“Terrorists have kidnapped Congress, and they’re asking for a $100 million dollar ransom, otherwise, they are going to douse them all in gasoline and set them on fire.

We are going from car to car, collecting donations.”

“How much is everyone giving, on average?” the driver asks.

“About a gallon!”


Normally I wouldn’t expect to get sent to Guantanamo for telling anti-Congress jokes. But these days, anything is possible. Especially if you’re Muslim. Or Irish.

Ask Saad Allami. He sent a text message to his sales team urging them to “blow away” the competition. The next thing you know he and his family were being swarmed by anti-terror cops.

…Or Leigh Van Bryan. An Irishman living in the UK, he and his friend Emily Banting got the quasi-Guantanamo treatment after posting tweets about planning to go on vacation to the USA to “destroy America” and “dig up Marilyn Monroe.” Explaining that “destroy” is British slang for “party” didn’t help. Humorlessness and imbecility are apparently requirements for working at TSA. 

Andrew Adler – Disappeared from the News

As an Irish Muslim, with two strikes against me already, I envy the complete impunity enjoyed by Jews like Andrew Adler, who can seriously urge the assassination of President Obama in a published op-ed and get away with it.

And Larry Silverstein, who can blow up the World Trade Center, brag about it on national TV, avoid prosecution, and collect billions from insurance companies on the premise that someone else – Muslims of course – did the dirty deed to which he himself confessed!

As an Irish Muslim, if I were to publish an op-ed calling on Hezbullah to assassinate the President, I’d be imprisoned at best, indefinitely detained at worst. Yet Adler’s still walking around free. Apparently his ethnic identity is a get-out-of-jail-free card.

That’s how it’s always been in Zionist-occupied Palestine. If an Israeli Arab kills a Jew, it’s curtains for that Arab. Yet Jews kill Arabs all the time with impunity.

In fact, IDF snipers have massacred innocent Palestinian children by at least the hundreds, almost certainly thousands, without any significant punishment.

Equal Opportunity Nazi Snipers

An article in the British Medical Journal(10/16/04) concluded: “Two thirds of the 621 children (two thirds under 15 years) killed at checkpoints, in the street, on the way to school, in their homes, died from small arms fire, directed in over half of cases to the head, neck and chest—the sniper’s wound.

Clearly, soldiers are routinely authorised to shoot to kill children in situations of minimal or no threat.”

But the US, unlike Israel, has Constitutionally-enshrined freedom of religion, as well as an equal-protection clause.

Every time a US official treats a Muslim differently from the way a Jew would have been treated in similar circumstances, it is a violation of the Constitution.

Yet Andrew Adler can seriously urge the killing of the President, while Muslim salesmen get Guantanamoed for trying to “blow away the competition.”

It used to be the USA.  Now it’s Israeli-occupied territory.  Anyone else ready for an intifada?

Editing:  Jim W. Dean

Zionist Neighborhood Watch Training Begins Early

Posted in USAComments Off on Will This Get Me Sent To Guantanamo?

Bush Knew Bin Laden Murdered in 2001


Toledo Blade, January 19, 2002

Bin Laden Death Deemed Murder of CIA Case Officer as 9/11 Coverup


 by Gordon Duff


President George W. Bush knew Osama bin Laden was a CIA agent and in no way ever involved in 9/11.

He knew bin Laden personally from family visits and knew bin Laden had been to the White House while living in the US under the cover name of “Tim Osmon.” 

This has been verified by CIA officials.

Bush also knew bin Laden died on December 13, 2001.  How did he know?  He read it on Fox News:

Report: Bin Laden Already Dead

Published December 26, 2001

This is not how it happend

Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung  complication, thePakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader  who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader.

“The Coalition troops are engaged in a mad search operation but they would  never be able to fulfill their cherished goal of getting Usama alive or dead,”  the source said.

Bin Laden, according to the source, was suffering from a serious lung  complication and succumbed to the disease in mid-December, in the vicinity of  the Tora Bora mountains. The source claimed that bin Laden was laid to rest  honorably in his last abode and his grave was made as per his Wahabi belief.

About 30 close associates of bin Laden in Al Qaeda, including his most  trusted and personal bodyguards, his family members and some “Taliban friends,”  attended the funeral rites. A volley of bullets was also fired to pay final  tribute to the “great leader.”

The Taliban source who claims to have seen bin Laden’s face before burial  said “he looked pale … but calm, relaxed and confident.”

Asked  whether bin Laden had any feelings of remorse before death, the source  vehemently said “no.” Instead, he said, bin Laden was proud that he succeeded in  his mission of igniting awareness amongst Muslims about hegemonistic designs and  conspiracies of “pagans” against Islam. Bin Laden, he said, held the view that  the sacrifice of a few hundred people in Afghanistan was nothing, as those who  laid their lives in creating an atmosphere of resistance will be adequately  rewarded by Almighty Allah.

When asked where bin Laden was buried, the  source said, “I am sure that like other places in Tora Bora, that particular  place too must have vanished.”

Tim Osmon and Brzezinski

CIA officials report that, even after 9/11, they were actively seeking a kidney transplant for bin Laden to keep him alive.  They confirmed that he was actively being paid, had security clearances and was working on assignments received on or after 9/11.

They also confirmed bin Laden had, because of health reasons, not been living in Bahrain as thought but San Diego.  While there, he visited the White House and met with George H. W. Bush and other members of the Bush family including George W. Bush.

Bin Laden felt betrayed when the President, a man he knew as a personal friend, ordered his killing after 9/11, particularly since bin Laden was an active CIA agent.

Other “hunts” for bin Laden were staged to provide him cover while his severe illness put him in and out of American hospitals, something that would have destroyed his credibility with many groups he worked with.

I confirmed bin Laden’s death in a personal meeting with General Athar Abbas and his staff in 2010.  They confirmed that America has been aware of bin Laden’s death for all along.  General Abbas refused to answer other questions on this subject.


Bin Laden died of kidney disease, being forced to leave his dialysis machine behind when American troops came to his home to kill him.  As a response, bin Laden did an interview with Al Jazeera denying any involvement with 9/11 and suggesting America look elsewhere.

This is from the official CIA transcript of Osama bin Laden’s last public statement:

CIA Official Transcript

  • “The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the US system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive.”

  • “They can be any one, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia.”

  • “Then you cannot forget the American Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.”

  • “Then there are intelligence agencies in the US, which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these (FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 180)  agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usama and Taliban and then this incident happened.”

  • “Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the US secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the US Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat.”

  • “President Bush or any other US President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who made the attacks.”

General Hamid Gul

This statement was made September 24, 2001.

There are no further statements from Osama bin Laden.

This transcript is officially certified by the Central Intelligence Agency.

By what information we have, from the CIA, from Pakistan, from interviews with ISI Director General at the time, Major General Hamid Gul, the death of Osama bin Laden was the murder of a CIA agent by Presidential order so as to silence dissent and cover up what appears to be a conspiracy of sorts, as many now see 9/11.



Presidential Order

With bin Laden, a CIA operative, murdered through denial of needed medical care, at presidential order, who else was similarly murdered?

Minimally, we can consider all who died searching for, not just someone uninvolved in 9/11, but a decorated CIA operative, as a victim of an illegal cover operation meant to hide a criminal act.

Every soldier killed in Afghanistan, hunting the imaginary Al Qaeda or the long dead Osama bin Laden was murdered.



Pakistani television interviewed individuals who witnessed a helicopter crash killing its American crew and passengers at Abbottabad, a mission supposedly meant to credit President Obama with the killing of a long dead CIA agent.

The video has been suppressed, classified and removed from Youtube and the records of the TV network that held it.  However, Veterans Today has a full translated transcript of that video:

This is a screenshot from the interview you are reading

Anchor: Welcome back, Mohammad Bashir is a resident of Abboottabad’s Bilal Town. Muhammad Bashir might seem an ordinary guy but he is no ordinary guy.

Muhammad Bashir lives in front of Osama Ben Laden’s house in Bilal Town Abbottabad.

On 2nd of May, Muhammad Bashir was present on his rooftop from where he saw the whole American operation against Osama Ben Laden with his own eyes.

Yesterday when our team was present In Bilal Town, Abbottabad, near Osama Ben Laden’s hose, Muhammad Bashir came to us and said, “Sister, I need to tell you something, something that is a burden on my heart and soul”, just listen to what he said.

Bashir: I am going to share something about the Abbottabad operation which till this day nobody else has told you.

Anchor: But Muhammad Bashir was a little afraid too, while talking to me he telephoned his relative, Vice President of Jummat-e-Islami, Abdur Razzaq Abasi, watch it

Who Really Was There?

Reporter: Tell me your name and tell me whare do you live

Bashir: Let me first, Let me talk to him one minute, i will give you full interview, full or half?

Reporter: Full Full

Bashir: Let me first talk to him

Reporter: To whom? To Abbasi?

Bashir: yes, to Abbasi

Anchor: Muhammad Bashir told us something that no one said before. So we checked his identity card, we also confirmed that he really lives there, we asked from the senior fellows about him. We were very astonished by his story just see and listen what he said.

Bashir: We were awake, not asleep, a helicopter came, some men came down from that, into that house, then that helicopter went away

Reporter: How many men?

Bashir: 10-12, then that helicopter took rounds of those rear hills, then he came bac…k and when he came bach, two more helicopters arrived, one from the west and other from the north, there was a blast in the first helicopter and it was on fire, we immediately came out, when we reached there, the helicopter was burning, then after about 20 minutes the army and police arrived, they pushed us back, now we are asking that if Osama was here then who took him to america because all those men that came in the helicopter died in the blast, now if Osama was in that helicopter he must have died and got burnt in that helicopter too, then how they took him? this is a question of serious concern. America claims they they killed him and picked him up. How they picked him up? This is what we are thinking

Pakistani Video Screenshot

Reporter: Was there only one helicopter?

Bashir? Yes the other that came flew away to Mansehra, there was only one that landed the men and came back to pick them but as he was picking them up, it blew away and caught fire.

Reporter: Then were in it when it blew?

Bashir: Yes They were.

Reporter: How you know?

Bashir: We saw it with our own eyes

Reporter: You saw dead man?

Bashir: Yes, dead men,

Reporter: How many?

Bashir: I couldnt count them because then the compound was on fire. The gate was open, we went in, the army and police hadnt arrived then, there were some people but they werent stopping them. The whole neighborhood has seen that but they are silent now.

Bashir: We saw the helicopter burning, we saw the dead bodies, then everything was removed and now there is nothing

The only unburned part of the helicopter

Reporter: How many dead bodies you saw?

Bashir: We couldn’t count them because they were blown into pieces.

The reporter asked Bashir to narrate the story again.

Bashir said we could see the faces of those men but they were speaking pashto. I dont know whether they were Pakistani or American army or people of agencies, as you know that agency people can speak many languages.

May be they were speaking Pashto so that we consider them Pakistani.

They knocked and banged at our doors and told us not to come out.

I laid down on my rooftop and was watching them.

My kids were calling me, I told them to go to their rooms and let me check whats going on.

The reporter asks Bashir, that when he saw that the helicopter was American what was he thinking then?

Bashir said that he got afraid. He didn’t had in his mind that they will attack that house. He thought that they might have come to attack the Pakistan Army.

The reporter asked so when was your cousin Shamraiz taken away?

Bashir: Shamrez was at our home, as the helicopter exploded, me and many others went out of our homes to see what happened. Shamrez also came out and the gate of the compound was open, we went in, every thing was lying scattered, as it is a huge compound, some body parts were lying here, some there, legs, arms, heads, broken and torn body parts, during that time some part of the helicopter inside, may be the engine or other fuel related part had an explosion so we rushed out. During that time Shamrez was taken away, he is in his home now, but no one is allowed to meet him and i couldn’t get a chance to talk to him later.

Then the anchor says that they had vegetations inside the compound and Shamrez was their gardener. We know that two men Arshad and Tariq used to live there. They had good relations with the neighbours, they used to buy things from the local store. Sometimes imported dates and used to send many things to their neighbours.

Burned helicopter wreckage

Then the reporter is at Abdullah Ben Zubair Mosque, which is the nearest to compound of Osama.

She asks a guy: do you think people would have been glad and happy if they would have ever met osama?

The guy : Yes, possibly. Because he was a muslim and he believed in God.

This is the whole story! Every aspect and point translated.

The gentleman being interviewed lives across from the compound. His cousin Sahab Jamrez Khan used to grow vegetables in the compound. He was taken away in all the hullabaloo on tape @10.29 Bashir says he did not see when they wisked his cousin away.

Interviewer asks “Have you spoken to your cousin?”

Bashir “No, I have not seen him yet he in in the house. “They will not let him get out” “They will not let me get in.”

2 other men Arshad Sahib and Tariq Sahib used to go to market to shop for that compound and bought international brand items. Dates, dried meat found in compound. Also food used to come from compound to Bashir’s house Kabulu Pilau and things like that used to be presented to Bashir. They will follow up with more information. In the end the lady is standing in front of Abdullah Bin Zubair mosque. The mosque was with in walking distance of the compound. She asks people if Osama did attend this mosque people would have be happy? The one answered maybe. The other said Osama did “not” live here but he was muslim and believed in God. Interview ends.

Another thing to note is that Bashir mentioned that we are very “sharif” meaning law abiding honest people. His town was a peaceful place no excitement no murders, fights, and he is unhappy how they have made his town so frightful with all this news. One thing is very clear in this video. Two helicopters hovered never landed. One landed dropped Pashto speaking poeple on the roof 10-12 of them Helicopter left fo 20 minutes returned to load people in and small blast engine failure fire helicopter parts all over. Body parts arms, legs, head, all over. Pakistani Army/Police came in dispersed crowd. The whole scene is cleaned up totally now. No evidence left to examine.

This is the Official Media Version – One that has gone through several stages of evolution

Several days later, an “official” helicopter crash happened to account for the deaths of those who died on the staged phony bin Laden killing, victims of poor planning and a helicopter pilot who flew into a wall when his night vision goggles were disabled by light sources on the ground.  I’ve been to this dance once or twice before.

From a Veterans Today story, August 6, 2011:

Today 31 NATO troops, 20 of them Navy Seals from the Osama bin Laden operation died in what is reported as a helicopter crash in Afghanistan. 

The chances of this story being true is almost nil.  The chances of this being a staged coverup is over 80%.  We believe these people were murdered to silence them.  This is why.

We have solid information on two areas:

  1. Osama bin Laden died in 2001 as an active CIA employee and his body was recovered in Afghanistan and taken to “the sand box.”  We were told it was frozen.  We have so much verification from this, CIA, ISI, US military and top officials.  I have a direct confirmation from Bin Laden’s CIA handler who I grilled mercilessly on this.

  2. The Abbottabad operation involved numerous American deaths, witnessed, bodies all over, a helicopter crash. (suppressed translated TV interview below) (now classified and “missing”)  These bodies were recovered by land vehicle from Islamabad and there was NO “successful” bin Laden operation of any kind.  There was and has been a CIA safe house in Abbotabad where terror suspects were stored for years.

Depleted Uranium Ammunition

How do we count murders?  Was bin Laden a murder?  Were the 3000 on 9/11 murdered and, if so, by whom?

Were all killed in the War on Terror, nearly 1.4 million dead, murder victims including some found to have died of radiation sickness, not from Depleted Uranium but from the illegal use of nuclear weapons by US forces.

That story including a BBC report and interview transcripts is available here.

Do we include the terrorist deaths in Pakistan, now numbering over 30,000 or their 8500 military dead as murders tied to 9/11?

Then we have the planes though no part, be it black box, engine, wing component or even cocktail napkin survived 9/11.  Every piece of evidence was systematically destroyed immediately in direct contravention of law.

Do you now wonder why a man dead for a decade was thrown into the sea or why Navy Seals were piled onto a National Guard helicopter for the first time in history and then conveniently plowed into the side of a mountain?

When and if you vote, realize you will be voting for people who chose silence or to be silenced over so many deaths, so many crimes, crimes and deaths so obvious, so  easy to prove. Choose carefully.

Posted in USA1 Comment

Shoah’s pages


February 2012
« Jan   Mar »