Archive | May 11th, 2012

Why the Media is Silent about Fukushima


There are no pictures of Fukushima babies yet. The Japanese government has been killing badly mutated babies. These poor Japanese mothers are not even allowed to see the babies.
Why the Media is Silent about Fukushima
Fukushima’s Reactor 4 threatens to make extinct ALL humanity.

Many have already come forward to speak about the impending extinction level event that Fukushima represents.

They have come forth and stated point blank that Fukushima is now on the brink of taking down the entire human race. This is the greatest danger humanity has ever faced, yet the mainstream media has barely covered the story… why?


Fukushima, the Asian 911

The reason becomes very clear when you realize that Fukushima was not an accident, and that those who own and operate the global media are devoted to protect the saboteur.

A terrorist attack destroyed the Fukushima Diachi nuclear power plant. They used a combination of an artificially created tsunami, nuclear bombs placed inside reactors 2 and 4 as well as the Stuxnet computer Virus, which they created.

Israeli security firm Magna BSP put two nuclear bombs INSIDE reactor 2 and 4. This is why the reactors exploded in a mushroom cloud.

Researcher Jim Stone first broke this story and then a more extensive article was published by amateur reporter from Tokyo here.


Israel did Fukushima

This is the elephant in the room that no one wants to face. Now this elephant is breathing radioactive waste right into our faces. This is the monstrosity that is Jewish power. The word in the mainstream media now is to avoid Fukushima at all costs. They know that the light will eventually be shined upon Israel if it comes to the public awareness how horrific Fukushima truly is. This explains why the western media is keeping quiet but why would the Japanese media not speak of this.

Israel did Fukushima. There is mountains of proof.

We must now come face to face with the fact that all humanity is now in danger of being annihilated by Zionism. We are on the very brink of our destruction and only our own strength can pull us out of this. We must now face directly the issue of Jewish power or else face our destruction.

The Japanese government is being held hostage. Israel has made it clear to them that they can cause a tsunami and quake at any time if they so choose. In addition to this there is also the threat of economic terrorism. Japan must obey or risk being completely destroyed. This is why the Japanese government is being forced into silence. Researcher Jim Stone made this startling deduction almost a year ago.

Japanese Journalist and former Editor of the Tokyo Times Yoshi Shmatsu

The Real Horrors facing us if we do not take action

This is not an ethereal issue like the Iraqi war or war in some far off land that will not affect us directly. This will affect ALL Americans and all humanity in the most direct way possible. It already has

  • Dead Babies
    The CDC has reported a 34% increase in the infant mortality rate in the North West States since Fukushima. If you live in Idaho and your baby has been born dead then you now know the cause.
  • Mutant Babies
    They are killing badly mutated babies in Japan now. They are not telling the parents why the babies were killed but the mutation rate in Japan is severe now. We know this through amateur reporting as the Japanese media is silent.

This mutant babies issue is the single most horrifying thing this writer has ever seen. When you consider that Fukushima is now at 68 times more radioactivity than Chernobyl and threatens to be hundreds of times worse than that if Reactor 4 blows becomes real in ones mind when once looks at pictures of Chernobyl babies.

The use of Depleted and Enriched Uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan has created a new crop of mutant babies. Keep in mind that while horrific, the use of Depleted and even enriched uranium is NOTHING compared to the radioactivity now being released by Fukushima and what COULD be released if reactor 4 is not fixed.

Mutant Babies, coming soon to a womb near you.


These pictures are from Chernobyl, Iraq and Afghanistan. A nuclear meltdown, depleted uranium and enriched uranium produced this. Fukushima will be at least 68 times WORSE than this.

This will soon be the reality all around us. When reactor 4 goes it will begin a cycle of horror through the world that will transform our earth into a veritable hell. At that point people will not care much about being called “anti Semitic” Of course at that point there will be no going back and all humanity will suffer. The humane and loving thing to do is to speak out now and call out this elephant in the room.

Speaking out about how horrible Fukushima is IS NOT ENOUGH! 


Otherwise nothing will be done. The more we speak out about the root of this poison the more we shall free the media to speak out. They will see they cannot keep it covered up and that Israel cannot be protected by silence any longer. The flood gates shall open and the world will be free to work together to solve this crisis. Speak out now, name the enemy. If this will not force us to face the elephant in the room then nothing will.




Posted in Campaigns, Politics2 Comments

Palestinian Hunger Strikers: Fighting Ingrained Duplicity

[Palestinians hold photographs of their relatives jailed in Israel during a support rally for Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike, in the West Bank city of Ramallah, May 5, 2012. Image by Majdi Mohammed/AP Photo.]
[Palestinians hold photographs of their relatives jailed in Israel during a support rally for Palestinian prisoners on hunger strike, in the West Bank city of Ramallah, May 5, 2012. Image by Majdi Mohammed/AP Photo.]

On his seventy-third day of hunger strike, Thaer Halahleh was vomiting blood, bleeding from his lips and gums, while his body weighs in at121 pounds—a fraction of its pre-hunger strike size. The thirty-three-year-old Palestinian follows the still-palpable footsteps of Adnan Khader and Hana Shalabi whose hunger strikes resulted in release. He also stands alongside Bilal Diab who is also entering his seventy-third day of visceral protest. Together, they inspired nearly 2,500 Palestinian political prisoners to go on hunger strike in protest of Israel’s policy of indefinite detention without charge or trial.

Administrative detention has constituted a core of Israel’s 1,500 occupation laws that apply to Palestinians only, and which are not subject to any type of civilian or public review. Derived from British Mandate laws, administrative detention permits Israeli Forces to arrest Palestinians for up to six months without charge or trial, and without any show of incriminating evidence. Such detention orders can be renewed indefinitely, each time for another six-month term.

Ayed Dudeen is one of the longest-serving detainees in Israeli captivity. First arrested in October 2007, Israeli officials renewed his detention thirty times without charge or trial. After languishing in a prison cell for nearly four years without due process, prison authorities released him in August 2011 only to re-arrest him two weeks later. His wife Amal  no longer tells their six children that their father is coming home, because, in her words, “I do not want to give them false hope anymore, I just hope that this nightmare will go away.”

Twenty percent of the Palestinian population of the Occupied Palestinian Territories have at one point been held under administrative detention by Israeli forces. Israel argues these policies are necessary to ensure the security of its Jewish citizens, including those unlawfully resident in settlements surrounding Jerusalem, Area C, and the Jordan Valley—in fragrant contravention of the Fourth Geneva Convention’s Article 49(6), which explicitly prohibits the transfer of one’s civilian population to the territory it occupies.

The mass hunger strike threatens to demolish the formidable narratives of national security long propagated by Israeli authorities. In its most recent session, the United Nation’s Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination concluded that Israel’s policy of administrative detention is not justifiable as a security imperative, but instead represents the existence of two laws for two peoples in a single land. The Committee went on to state that such policies amount to arbitrary detention and contravene Article 3 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which prohibits “racial segregation and apartheid.” Nevertheless, this apartheid policy has so far escaped the global condemnation it deserves. In general, Palestinian grievances are consistently evaded with the help of media bias that accords faint coverage to signs of resistance, including even this extraordinary non-violent movement mounted by Palestinian victims of institutionalized state abuse.

Although there has not been a principled or total abandonment of armed struggle by Palestinians living under occupation, there has been a notable and dramatic shift in emphasis to the tactics of nonviolence. For yearsliberal commentators in the West have been urging the Palestinians to make such a shift, partly for pragmatic reasons. Even President Obama echoed this suggestion in his 2009 Cairo address when he said,

“Palestinians must abandon violence….For centuries, black people in America suffered the lash of the whip as slaves and the humiliation of segregation. But it was not violence that won full and equal rights. It was a peaceful and determined insistence upon the ideals at the center of America’sfounding.”

But when Palestinians act in this recommended manner, the West averts its gaze and Israel responds with cynical disregard, dismissing near-death Palestinian hunger strikers as publicity stunts or cheap tricks to free themselves from imprisonment. Today, Palestinians have epitomized the best of American values that reflect the global history of non-violent resistance, as they wage a mass hunger strike, engage in a global boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israeli Apartheid, and risk their bodies on a weekly basis in peaceful protests against the Annexation Wall. The latter continues to expand its devastating encroachment upon and around Palestinian lands in defiance of a near unanimous Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice as well as countless Security Council Resolutions.

Yet, this America chooses to label the hunger strikers’ prison guards, the architects of racist laws and policies, as well as the engineers of the Apartheid Wall, as the sole and exemplary democracy in the Middle East. Rather than condemn Israel’s colonial practices, which constitute the core of Arab grievances and explain the widespread resentment of the US role in the Middle East, a US Congressional House panel has just now approved nearly one billion US dollars in additional military assistance to augment Israel’s anti-missile defense program. If passed, Israel will receive a record amount of four billion dollars in military aid next year by any country in the world.

There is a stark contrast between the round-the-clock coverage given to Chen Guangchen, the blind Chinese human rights activist who escaped from house arrest to the safety of the US Embassy, and the scant notice given this unprecedented Palestinian challenge to the Israeli prison system that is subjecting the protesters to severe health risks, even death. What is more, such hunger strikes are part of a broader Palestinian reliance on a powerful symbolic appeal to the conscience of humanity in their quest for long-denied rights under international law. Said deprivations include a disavowal of a peace process that has gone nowhere for decades while a pattern of settlement expansion has made any realization of the widely endorsed “two-state solution” increasingly implausible. The prolonged nature of the occupation also steadily transforms what was supposed to be a temporary occupation into a permanent arrangement best understood as a mixture of annexation and apartheid.

In the face of this opportunity to place pressure upon Israel to comply with international law and human rights norms, the international community of governments and inter-governmental institutions has been grotesquely silent as Palestinians place their very lives at sacrificial risk. For its part, the United Nations’ most senior officials said nothing until a group of forty young protesters blocked the entrance of UN offices in Ramallah on 8 May demanding the issuance of a statement on behalf of the hunger striking prisoners. Together with the help of a global social media campaign to trend #UNclosed, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon and UNRWA’s director Filippo Grandi have finally issued statements expressing deep concern. Grandi has gone the farthest to urge that Israel either provide trials for the detainees or release them, though his statement has been conspicuously removed from the Agency’s website.

It is hard to deny the irony of tacit approval, at worst, or timid condemnation, at best, in the United Nations, the United States, or elsewhere. In its 2008 Boumedienne decision, the US Supreme Court declared that (arguably) the world’s most villainous and immoral persons are entitled to habeas corpus review in US courts in order to avoid the cruelty of indefinite detention. Yet, Israel’s policy of detaining indigenous Palestinians who inhabit the lands the State seeks to confiscate and settle for more than four decades denied those Palestinians exactly such legal protection. What are Palestinians to do in the face of such frustrating circumstances? What message does the lack of international support for their strong displays of nonviolence, self-sacrifice, and personal bravery send to them and to their Arab and Muslim counterparts who are once more exposed to blatant US hypocrisy in the region?

Palestinian civil society is now mainly opting for explicit acts of collective nonviolent resistance to register their dissatisfactions with the failures of the United Nations—or inter-governmental diplomacy in general—to produce a sustainable peace that reflects Palestinian rights under international law. The main expression of this embrace of nonviolence is the adoption of tactics used so successfully by the anti-Apartheid campaign to change the political climate in racist South Africa, yielding a nonviolent path to multiracial constitutional democracy. At the present time the growing BDS movement is working to achieve similar results.

Let us recall that successful global nonviolent movements are not restricted to fasts and marches, but include the boycott, non-cooperation, and civil disobedience tactics deployed by Palestinians today. Though President Obama, encumbered as he may be by a domestic election cycle, may feel compelled to ignore Palestinian responses to his call, the rest of the world should not.  Certainly, US-based and global citizens should demand that the Western media begin to act responsibly when dealing with injustices inflicted on the Palestinian people, and not sheepishly report human rights abuses only when committed by the adversaries of their state. The media itself is a tactical target and a residual problem. In solidarity with the hunger strikers, civic allies should address the institutional edifice upholding administrative detention. It extends from a discriminatory core and therefore its requisite treatment includes ensuring the enjoyment of internationally guaranteed rights; rights enshrined by the BDS call to action and reified by the movement’s steady and deliberate progression.

Posted in Palestine Affairs, Human RightsComments Off on Palestinian Hunger Strikers: Fighting Ingrained Duplicity

UK: Halal Monitoring Committee Limited goes into liquidation but is trading as HMC (UK) as it continues its work to supply Genuine Halal Category: Home, Industry News UK & World


6/5/12  HMC (UK) Press release

This article was posted on 2nd May 2012, we have had a number of people contact us that they couldn’t post comments which has been down to a technical problem from our end.

Halal Monitoring Committee Limited is in the process of being dissolved allowing them to be debt free and to continue their work they have set up as HMC (UK). The following press was issued to us 1/5/12.


HMC Background

In September 2011, HMC registered for VAT as agreed with the HMRC. Previous to this, HMC believed it was exempt from VAT due to the nature of its work and charity status

In early 2012, HMRC informed HMC that it should re-bill all its pre-existing customers for VAT dating back from 2005 and make payments due

The majority of pre-existing customers would be able to re-claim VAT from HMRC but could not pay due to cash flow

This requirement by HMRC caused HMC to have significant unforeseen cash flow issues, that it could not reconcile and settle with HMRC


After consulting with Scholars, and in response:

HMC UK has been established by concerned Trustees and Ulama to continue the work of Halal

Since February 2012 it has already taken on the responsibility of supplying genuine halal to 500+ outlets throughout the UK (continuity of halal supply)


Yunus Dudhwala, said the “the work for Halal is an important matter within the community and we are pleased with the response and support received”. HMC UK are pleased to support the Muslim Community and continue to provide much needed Halal Certification.

Posted in UKComments Off on UK: Halal Monitoring Committee Limited goes into liquidation but is trading as HMC (UK) as it continues its work to supply Genuine Halal Category: Home, Industry News UK & World

Election Fraud, Media Deception, and the Crisis of Conservatism


The Treatment of Ron Paul and Stephen Harper in Engineering the Political Economy of North America

by Anthony J. Hall

Part One

A Note from the Author: As I worked on my first essay on the robocon scandal I was drawn to look more and more to the possible linkages connecting voter suppression in Canada to election fraud in the United States. Given the history of the Harper Conservatives and the well-documented theft of the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections by Republican campaign team of George W. Bush, it did not seem like a major stretch to posit that we are dealing with phenomena that are best understood within continental rather than national frameworks. I was reinforced in this view as I began to look at the treatment being meted out to Ron Paul’s campaign by the establishment of the Republican Party. The thought occurred to me that the same establishment willing to cheat to keep Ron Paul from winning the keys to the White House might share some common ground with the establishment that backed and facilitated Stephen Harper’s rise from prairie populist to Prime Minister of Canada in a remarkable brief period.

Cheating on elections can cut both ways, in this case to install one kind of conservative into high office while keeping another kind of conservative from achieving the rewards of a campaign that has clearly generated a lot of excitement among grass roots activists. What does this contrast tell us about the range of perspectives and strategies that can appropriately be described as conservative? What is the history of different schools of North American conservatism? What are the implications of importing by whatever means the conservatism Republican Party politics into Canada to replace the Tory traditions indigenous to the country that emerged from the conservative side of the American Revolution? The more I thought about these matters the more it seemed useful to combine some reflections on the crisis of conservatism in North America with a report on Canadian and US versions of election fraud mostly emanating from the right wing of the political spectrum. On the advice of the editor I am submitting this essay in multiple parts.

Continentalism and Conservatism


Ron Paul and Stephen Harper are two very different types of conservative. Ron Paul is a Republican Congressman from Texas who is currently making his third bid to become president of the United States. Compared with Ron Paul, Stephen Harper is still a relative newcomer on the political stage. Nevertheless within the span of less than a decade Harper went from founding of a new political party to guiding it to form the basis of the Canadian government.

Along the way to power, Harper’s political juggernaut eliminated the old party of indigenous conservatism in Canada replacing it with a clone and a satellite of the Republican Party in the United States. How is it, many have asked, that a political machine developed to extend the Bush-Cheney brand of neo-conservatism is finding traction in Canada even as it has been so thoroughly discredited in the United States. Is the rightward march of government authority the outcome of free, fair and balanced debate within Canada? Does the rightward shift reflect the genuine political will of Canadian citizens? Or have the Harper Conservatives been the beneficiaries of vote rigging tactics together with media manipulations that have emanated especially prolifically from the intersection where the US Republican Party meets the so-called national security apparatus of the United States?

Both Paul and Harper are currently at the eyes of gathering political storms whose effect is to call attention to the importance of election fraud in determining who is allowed access to the levers of government control in North America. As I write, Ron Paul is being blocked from marshaling his broad public support to square off against President Barak Obama as the Republican Party’s nominee in the next presidential election. It appears that Ron Paul is being held back by elements of the same political establishment that helped engineer the last federal election to give Stephen Harper’s Conservative Party an illegitimate and illegal boost.

Much of this cheating in Canada involved initiatives to prevent citizens from voting. This category of election fraud is generally described as voter suppression.[i] Fraudulent telephone communications had as their goal the disenfranchising of many voters by sending targeted groups and individuals to non-existent polling stations. The Conservative Party operatives making these live and automated calls sometimes claimed speciously to be calling on behalf of the nonpartisan federal agency, Elections Canada.[ii] Other fraudulent calls sought to turn recipients against their preferred political party by misrepresenting the source of insulting and harassing telephone messages.

Elections Canada has received over 40,000 contacts mostly expressing concern over allegations of voter suppression. Overlapping complaints have been consolidated by Elections Canada into 800 files covering at least 200 of the 308 electoral ridings throughout Canada. The federal agency, Elections Canada, has opened more than 250 related files as part of its inquiry into “allegations of wrongdoing during the 41st General Election.”[iii]These statistics were brought forward before a multi-party committee of the House of Commons by Marc Mayrand, Chief Electoral Officer and the head of the nonpartisan agency, Elections Canada. Mayrand’s presentation to the Committee had been scheduled to coincide with the release of the federal budget, an obvious tactic by the governing party meant to divert media attention away from the information about to be released by Maynard.[iv]

Prior to this current scandal Maynard spent six years working on a case that would eventually see the Harper’s Conservative Party of Canada fined $52,000 in 2011 for overspending and for accounting violations of Canada’s election laws. The controversy arose in the federal election of 2006 in what came to be known as the “In and Out Affair.”[v] According to one observer close to the government, the Harper Conservatives were emboldened to break the law of electioneering in Canada as “the type of thing practiced by their Republican brethren in the United States.”[vi] The Conservatives’ guilty plea came in the context of a plea bargain that saw charges dropped against the top operatives who ordered the illegal transactions.


Bob Rae, a veteran parliamentarian and Interim Leader of the federal Liberal Party of Canada, has expressed the view that Elections Canada is not the appropriate agency to be leading the investigation into what some are calling the robocon scandal. “There’s no accounting for what happens to complaints once they’re made, what the results are.”[vii] Perhaps with recollections of the secrecy surrounding the Conservative Party/Elections Canada plea bargain in the In and Out Affair, Rae added, “It’s not a transparent process and I’m troubled by it.” In early March Rae stood from his seat in the Canadian House of Commons to ask for a Royal Commission into alleged and proven wrongdoing in the course of the last three elections in Canada.[viii]

A group called the Council of Canadians has initiated court challenges alleging wrongdoing in seven ridings where the margin of victory was particularly tight.[ix] So far the star witness has been Annette Desgagne, a whistle blower who was employed during the last federal election at the call centre of the Responsive Marketing Group (RMG) in Thunder Bay Ontario[x]. Since the ingestion of the Progressive Conservative Party by the Harper Conservatives in 2003, RMG has been the primary data collection and data mining partner of the new political entity. This specialty makes RMG one of the possible channels for Conservative interaction with those “Republican brethren” that have made the dark arts of election fraud the primary nemesis of US democracy.

Desgagne has sworn under oath that she alerted Elections Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and her own supervisors at RMG when she realized the scripts that she and her fellow operators were given to read to voters across the country were full of fraudulent information including directions to wrong or non-existent polling stations. The Conservative Party’s lawyer on the case is Arthur Hamilton, a veteran of the In and Out Affair. He and Conservative Party’s spokesperson, Fred DeLorey, denied the veracity of Desgagne’s affidavit. They attempted to sweep aside the court challenge as “a transparent attempt to overturn certified election results simply because the activist group doesn’t like them.”[xi]

As Canada’s Chief Electoral Officer indicated in his presentation before a House of Commons Committee, “any action taken to deliberately misdirect electors and interfere with their right to vote under the Constitution and Elections Act is a serious offence.” He added “It not only denies the fundamental rights of the affected electors, but it diminishes our democratic institution and the rights of all Canadians.”[xii] The Conservative Party majority in the Canadian House of Commons is based on a plurality of less than 7,000 votes spread over 14 electoral ridings. Less than 40% of the overall vote was attributed to the Harper Conservatives in an electoral contest where five parties won seats in the Canadian House of Commons.


Election Fraud and Democracy

Because of the requirement to employ paper ballots the range of options available for cheating in Canadian elections is less than that in the United States, where electronic voting machines have been widely embraced. The embrace of this technology, which is notoriously open to many types of digital hacking and rigging, has taken place mostly under the auspices of the Republican Party which has close historic connections with the developers of the ES&S, Diebold (Premier) and Sequoia Pacific voting systems.[xiii] The Republican Party’s determination to achieve power through election fraud is well chronicled in the documented tactics that twice put George W. Bush in the job of US president in spite of the fact that he got less votes than his chief opponents, Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004.[xiv]

Moreover, the possibility cannot be ruled out that the deep-state apparatus in the CIA and other so-called national security agencies have played some part in the dramatic transformation of Canada’s political culture over the last decade, including through the swinging of elections.[xv]That decade saw a precipitous decline in the electoral fortunes of the Liberal Party whose historic status as Canada’s governing party presently seems, for the time being at least, to have been preempted by the Harper Conservatives.

An essential marker of this shift occurred in 2003 when Liberal Prime Minister, Jean Chretien, refused to commit Canadian troops to participate in the invasion of Iraq. At the same time the then-Leader of Her Majesty’s Official Opposition, Stephen Harper, was outspoken in advocating Canada’s full participation in the Anglo-American drive to overthrow militarily the government of Saddam Hussein. With co-author Stockwell Day, Harper affirmed his party’s position in a article in the Wall Street Journal. The authors echoed the rhetoric of George W. Bush in invoking the values of “freedom, democracy, and civilization itself “ as the basis for condemning “the forces of evil, including Saddam Hussein and the perpetrators of the attacks of September11, 2001.”[xvi]

It does not take a huge leap of imagination to picture how this fundamental dividing of the ways might have prompted some members of President George W. Bush’s neo-conservative Executive branch to extend to Canada some variation of the tactics of clandestine regime change that have been deployed by the CIA in dozens and dozens of countries around the world. The Bush clan, after all, is well known for its deep involvement in the CIA and the type of covert operations in which it specializes.[xvii] While the more extreme methods of regime change extend to political assassinations and even invasions, more subtle forms of manipulation involve rigging elections combined with steering public opinion through engineered media campaigns.[xviii]

Since the documented instances of cheating occur disproportionately on the right wing of politics, this form of fraud poses especially perplexing problems for those who picture themselves as conservative. The questions raised are many. What, for instance, is being conserved when elites exploit their privileges to hire agents that fix the outcome of elections and thereby undermine society’s integrity? What was being conserved in, for instance, 2000 and 2004 when the right-wing forces of George W. Bush stole two federal elections in order to conduct illegal and lethal military adventures abroad, police state repressions at home, and kleptocratic banking practices that increased enormously the entitlements of the rich at the expense of the poor and the middle class?


What is being conserved when whole ecosystems are overturned in the name of applying false theories of free market interaction that fail to account for environmental desecration in calculations of profit and lose, credit and debt? What is conservative about socializing many kinds of liability, such as the massive costs of overzealous speculation by bankers, and privatizing profits such as those derived from the publicly-funded bailouts of large financial institutions? What is conservative about deregulating the commercial sphere to such extreme degrees that that corporate executives and their chiefs of creative accounting are rendered free to steal with impunity from shareholders, pension funds, and employees?

Like the banking debacle, the Fukushima debacle, or the Gulf of Mexico oil spill debacle, the rash of revelations about the growing pervasiveness of election fraud is one more illustration that the excesses of deregulation are sapping vitality from some of society’s most important institutions. The corrosion of electoral systems through cheating undermines the wellbeing of all citizens irrespective of ideological or political attachments. In Canada, the United States or anywhere else claiming to be a democracy, the rigging of elections negates the principle that the power of government is founded in the will of the people.


Electoral fraud violates the very purpose of holding elections in the first place. It brings to power governors that do not have the consent of the governed. Elections fraud rewards criminality and penalizes those that adhere to the laws of the land. Even when exposed to the full light of day, as happened with the US presidential elections of 2000 and 2004, election fraud rarely results in dethroning those who took control of government through illegal means. Electoral fraud reinforces the toxic and deeply antisocial conception that good guys finish last.

The trajectory of election fraud that negated the will of the American people in 2000 and 2004 is erupting once again, this time within the internal voting structures of the Republican Party. Evidence continues to mount in, for instance, Iowa, Nevada, Maine, New Hampshire, Georgia, Alaska, Alabama, and South Carolina that systemic forms of cheating are permeating the Republican Party’s state-by-state votes to choose its next presidential candidate.[xix]

Vote rigging is sometimes aided and abetted by the large broadcasting companies who slant and apportion coverage in ways that ignore, downplay, or misrepresent election fraud. This most recent round of vote rigging accompanied by media deception is meant to create and confirm the impression of Ron Paul as a fringe candidate. The reporting of the Republican primary in South Carolina, for instance, declared Newt Gingrich to be the winner with less that 1% of the polls being counted.[xx] This type of collusion to prejudge the outcome of elections before the largest mass of votes have even come in let alone been counted extends the fraud advanced during the presidential election of 2000 when Fox News wrongly declared George Bush to be the winner. This call was not an honest mistake but rather a bid to direct the future flow of history through the purposeful dissemination of disinformation.[xxi]

From Preaching on the Frontier to Governing Canada

Born in 1959, Stephen Harper is a career politician who came of age politically in the late 1980s as a student of the so-called Calgary School centred in the political science department at the University of Calgary. Harper was tutored in Calgary by the likes of professors Tom Flanagan and Robert Mansell. The teachers and students of the Calgary School sought to develop a Canadian version of the Reaganomic assault on the Keynesian social welfare state. They sought to shrink the size of government involvement in the fields of health, social security and education even as they advocated military Keynesianism to build up the coercive power of the state.[xxii]

Ron Paul’s politics would have appealed to many of the evangelical Christians and prairie populists who rallied around the Social Credit Party that formed the basis of the provincial government of Alberta from 1935 to 1971. Beginning in 1943 the Alberta government was led by Ernest Manning who continued his predecessor’s radio preaching on behalf of Calgary’s Prophetic Bible Institution. Also a Baptist preacher, Ernest’s son Preston founded the Reform Party of Canada in 1987 attracting the involvement of a young Stephen Harper. With the help and advice of the Calgary School’s Tom Flanagan, Harper eventually pushed Manning and his successor aside to take control of the entity that ingested the Progressive Conservative Party in 2003.

Harper and Flanagan made it their mission to import into Canada a distilled version of the style of conservatism developed by Barry Goldwater and brought to presidential fruition by Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. Harper embraced the renewal of US expansionism as politically facilitated by the strange marriage of the most extreme branches of evangelical Christianity with the more radical forms of Zionism animating the right-wing policies of Israel’s Likud Party. Increasingly Harper modeled his quest for power on the neo-conservatism of George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the so-called Vulcans in the Bush war cabinet.[xxiii]

In the federal votes of 2000 and 2004 the operatives of the two-term Bush-Cheney presidency took electoral fraud to new levels of audacity. Nothing, not even the constraints of law nor the realities of voter preference, was allowed to stand in the way of the most aggressive branch of the war party. In integrating himself and his supporters yet more deeply into the US war party, that has as its main international extension in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Harper sought to advance the interests in Canada of the same complex of North American financial elites that had formed the Republican Party’s neo-conservative base.

The Canadian prime minister almost never utters a word of criticism of the class that dominates the stock exchanges on Bay Street in Toronto or on Wall Street in New York. Moreover, Harper has given high priority to integrating the Canadian Armed Forces ever more deeply into the dominant military apparatus of North America. Indeed, Harper has made himself an unabashed advocate, promoter and apologist for the aggressions of the world’s most formidable and violent military juggernaut. By courting power in these ways, Prime Minister Harper’s Conservative Party was rewarded with a majority of seats in the Canadian House of Commons in the federal election of 2011. The results of that election, however, are contested.


Mr. Paul Goes to Washington, Mr. Harper Goes to Ottawa

Stephen Harper is no Ron Paul. Canada’s current prime minister is 24 years younger than Ron Paul. There is much more than age, however, dividing Ron Paul’s politics from the politics of Stephen Harper. As the crisis in conservatism deepens, the divide between Harper and Paul acquires added meaning. This rift helps expose the stark outlines of the tectonic shifts that are changing the landscape of North America’s political economy. The differing conservative visions driving the politics of Ron Paul and Stephen Harper help to clarify the changing geography of leadership and dissent, truth seeking and fraud in this era of growing polarization between haves and have nots.

During the course of the state-by-state primaries in the Republican Party, Ron Paul seemed to be well ahead of the rest of the field in the contest for hearts and minds even as he is officially lost ballot count after ballot count.[xxiv] The evidence is overwhelming that outright cheating is a significant factor in the disparity between performance and outcomes. By denying the just reward of electoral success to Paul and his supporters, the Republican Party establishment is significantly upping the ante in a time of growing impatience and even outrage with the dishonest conceits of entrenched privilege.

For good or for bad, a more modest replica of the kind of frenzied excitement generated by Barrack Obama’s campaign in 2008 is developing in and around the Ron Paul camp in 2012. The social networking depicting the large crowds of college students attracted by Ron Paul’s campaign together with the impressive Washington rally on February 20 of veterans and serving soldiers supporting his candidacy signals the kind of unorthodox coalition that the maverick libertarian has been assembling.[xxv] So too does the absence of these evocative images in most mainstream reports of the Republican Party primaries indicate the severity of the establishment’s blackout. The affect of this censorship is to deny many citizens, regardless of their political affiliations, the information they need to help assess the significance of Ron Paul’s campaign, but especially its anti-war message.

The impressive display of grass roots mobilization energizing Ron Paul’s campaign is being denied its just desserts in order hand a tarnished and illegitimate mandate to Mitt Romney. Such corruption is fast reducing the United States in the eyes of many in the global community to the status of the banana republics that the CIA and US military have propped up, often with horrific brutality. Given Mitt Romney’s history as one of Wall Street’s quintessential kleptocrats, this blatant election fraud within the Republican Party exposes the preeminence of vulture capitalism in maintaining America’s predatory place in the world. Romney’s pyrrhic victory illustrates graphically the role of concentrated wealth, no matter how dubiously obtained, in determining who belongs where in pyramidal structures of command and control.

The straight talking Ron Paul provides a very effective counterpoint to Mitt Romney and Stephen Harper, two political opportunists prone to hide the shady dealings of the class they serve behind the ornamented façade of conservative party brands. Ron Paul has sometimes been compared to Jefferson Smith, the hero of the 1939 classic, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Mr. Jefferson Smith is the incorruptible character whose earnest portrayal by Jimmy Stewart thrust the actor into Hollywood stardom. Like Jefferson Smith, Ron Paul is an idealistic outsider whose vision of change menaces many entrenched interests. Unlike Jefferson Smith, Ron Paul is no newcomer to the Washington scene.

Born four years before the release of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, the veteran of political combat in the US Congress conveys both the gravitas and star power of a mature Jimmy Stewart. But Ron Paul and his millions of supporters are playing out for real a drama where the life-and-death stakes are enormous. Members of the Republican Party establishment have conspired against Ron Paul so aggressively that they have rendered their nemesis as a real life embodiment of the underdog hero that is featured so often as the lead character in scores of Hollywood dramas.

Ronald Earnest Paul has been an unrelenting opponent of the public powers invested in the private proprietors of the secretive and unaccountable US Federal Reserve. He deplores the system of fiat currency that compounds the weight of debt at an even faster rate than the accelerating inflation of the money supply. As Ron Paul sees it, this fast-increasing indebtedness goes primarily to fund the madness of a parasitical American imperium with warring strategies and operations all over the world. Since 1997 Ron Paul has given Republican representation to his constituents in 14th Congressional District of Texas. He first entered politics in 1971, winning a Congressional seat in 1976 and again in 1985. As an obstetrician-gynecologist, Dr. Paul has helped more than 4,000 mothers give birth to their children. He served on the medical staff of the US Air Force.

Ron Paul’s first bid for the presidency was in 1988 when he ran as the candidate for the Libertarian Party. In 2008 Paul sought to become the Republican Party’s presidential nominee. There is a long list of libertarian causes accompanying his attacks on the transgressions of bankers and the war mongering of America’s dominant elites. Paul lines up, for instance, with the friends of minimalist government, low taxation, expansive property rights, and the legalization of marijuana. He sides with the opponents of abortion, gun control and the social welfare state.[xxvi]

For consistently opposing abuses of power in the realm of banking and military invasions, Ron Paul has garnered the reserved respect and appreciation of many on the left who agree with his anti-imperialism and well as some aspects of his diagnosis of the financial debacle. But for those who believe in the importance of the state as an instrument to promote and safeguard the collective wellbeing of the whole society, but especially its most disadvantaged members, this marriage of political convenience can only be stretched so far.

Ron Paul’s particular form of conservatism denies group rights by putting all the emphasis on individual liberties. This propensity shows up most clearly when it comes to Ron Pau’s role as an inspirational figure in the genesis of the Tea Party movement.[xxvii]The Tea Party movement began independently of the Republican Party. The most recent cycle employing the imagery of Anglo-America’s most seminal tax revolt originated in 2006 in an event entitled the Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth.[xxviii] A former director of the US Star Wars program, Lt.-Colonel Robert Bowman was prominent among those who organized a ritual throwing overboard into Boston Harbor of the inadequate and deeply flawed report of the 9/11 Commission. The aim of this display of contempt for the government’s spurious 9/11 cover story was to dramatize the need for American patriots to reject the frauds imposed from above by dishonest, illegitimate, and unaccountable authorities.

What began as a genuine populist effort to criticize America’s ruling cabal was in due course co-opted by the some of the elites the tea partiers sought initially to expose, discredit, and displace. The notorious Koch brothers used the carrot of funding to help divert the movement away from its founding principles. Similarly, the extensive coverage of the Tea Party by the psy ops specialists at Fox News helped transform the spectacle into a cartoon-like caricature affording major publicity to extremists who disregarded the founding critique of the organizers of the Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth.

[i] Spencer Overton, Stealing Democracy: The New Politics of Voter Suppression (New York: W.W. Norton, 2006)

[ii] Tonda MacCharles, “Conservative Scripts Misdirected Voters in 2011 Election, Say Call Centre Staff,” The Toronto Star, 27 February, 2012 at–conservative-scripts-misdirected-voters-in-2011-election-say-call-centre-staff

[iii] Stephen Maher and Glen McGregor, “Fraudulent Robocalls Absolutely Outragious: Chief Electoral Officer,” The Montreal Gazette, 30 March, 2012 at

[iv]Meagan Fitzpatrick, “Elections Canada Probing Call Complaints in 200 Ridings,” 29 March, 2012 at

Kady O’Malley, “Committee Recap: Elections Canada Looking into 800 complaints Covering 2000 Ridings: Chief Electoral Officer,” CBC News Inside Politics Blog, 29 March, 2012 at

[v] Steven Chase, Tory Senators Face Elections Charges Over Campaign Spending,” The Globe and Mail, 25 February, 2011 at

Laura Payton, “Conservative Party Fined Over Breaking Election Laws,” CBC News, 10 November, 2011, at

[vi] Duff Conacher cited in Lawrence Martin, Harperland: The Politics of Control (Toronto: Penguin, 2011), 32

[vii] Rae cited CBC News, “Is Elections Canada the Right Agency to Investigate Robocalls,” 2 March, 2012 at

[viii] See Hall, “Canada, Fixing Elections Through Fraud” On the Need for a Royal Commission on Electoral Practices in Canada,” Global, 21 April, 2012 at

[ix] Stephen Maher and Glen McGregor, “Robocall Ridings Face Legal Challenge to Overturn Federal Election Result, The National Post, 27 March, 2012 at

[x] Allan Woods, “Robocalls: Conservative Party’s Firm Directed Voters to wrong Polling Stations, Says Former Employee, Toronto Star, 18 April, 2012 at–robocalls-conservative-party-s-firm-directed-voters-in-northern-ontario-to-wrong-polling-stations-says-former-employee

Affidavit of Annette Desgagne, sworn April 13, 2012, Court File No. T-63312 in the case of Ken Ferance and Peggy Walssh Craig versus Attornet General of Canada, Marc Mayrand et al. at

[xi] Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher, Tories, Call-Bank Company Reject Affidavit Alleging Voter Misdirection, Ottawa Citizen, 18 April, 2012 at

[xii] Mayrand cited by Meagan Fitzpatrick, “Elections Canada Probing Call Complaints in 200 Ridings,” 29 March, 2012 at

[xiii] Bev Harris with David Allen, Black Box Voting: Ballot Tampering in the Twenty-First Century ( Renton Washington: Talion, 2004)

[xiv] Mark Crispin Miller, Fooled Again: The Real Case for Electoral Reform. Second Edition (New York: Basic Books, 2007), Miller ed., Loser Take All: Election Fraud and the Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008 (Brooklyn N.Y.: Ig Publishing, 2008)

On the 2000 election see

Greg Palast, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. Expanded Edition (New York: Plume, 2004); Howard Gilman, The Votes That Count: How the Courts Decided the 2000 Presidential Election (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001); Bruce Ackerman, ed., Bush v. Gore: The Question of Legitimacy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002)

On the 2004 election see

Robert Fritakis, Steven Rosenfeld, and Harvey Wsserman, What Happened in Ohio? A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election (New York: New Press, 2006); Robert F. Kennedy “Was the 2004 Election Stoen? How 350,000 Votes Disappeared in Ohio,” Rolling Stone, June, 2004; Michael Keefer, “Evidence of Fraud in 2004 U.S. Presidential Election: A Reader,” Global Research .ca, 5 December, 2004 at

[xv] Bob Fritakis, “Demonstration Democracy: The Voting Machine Industrial Complex,” Counterpunch, 8 September, 2003 at

Wayne Madsen, Ohio ’04 Election Was Not Challenged to Protect CIA Election Rigging Technology, Intrepid Report, 12 March, 2012 at

[xvi] Stephen Harper and Stockwell Day, “Canadians Stand with You,” The Wall Street Journal. 28 March, 2003 at

[xvii] Kevin Phillips, American Dynasty: Aristocracy, Fortune, and the Politics of Deceit in the House of Bush(New York: Viking, 2004)

[xviii] William Blum, Killing Hope: Military and CIA Interventions since World War II (Monroe Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995); Stephen Kinzer, Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2006)



North Dakota







South Carolina

Russia Today

Alex Jones

Misreporting on Elections


[xxi]David W. Moore, How to Steal an Election: The Inside Story of How George Bush’s Brother and FOX News Miscalled the 2000 Election and Changed the Course of History (New York: Nation Press, 2006)

[xxii] Marci McDonald, “The Man Behind Stephen Harper,” Walrus, October, 2004 at

[xxiii] James Mann, The Rise of the Vulcans: The Bush War Cabinet (New York: Viking, 2004)



[xxvi] Christopher Horner and Karen Kwiatowski, Ron Paul: A Life of Ideas (Winnipeg: Variant Press, 2008)

[xxvii] Theda Skocpol and Vanessa Williams, The Tea Party and the Remaking of the Republican Conservatives (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012)


Posted in USAComments Off on Election Fraud, Media Deception, and the Crisis of Conservatism

Engdahl on Putin, “The Putin Tape” (Video)

Bill Engdahl on Russia Today

Bill Engdahl’s Video on Russia Today “The Putin Tape

Bill Engdahl for Veterans Today

F. William Engdahl on the world with Putin back as Russian President: Engdahl explains US Missile Defense it is not Ballistic Missile Defense; it is Ballistic Missile Offense–a trigger to possible nuclear war. Clinton’s “Reset” has given Russia only problems.
Now Putin faces major geopolitical choices to deepen ties with China and Eurasia and build network of rail infrastructure to cement those ties.

Posted in RussiaComments Off on Engdahl on Putin, “The Putin Tape” (Video)

How Nuclear Can IsrHell Be?

By Ismail Salami


Imagine a world plunged in darkness and extreme cold with the sunlight screened off by a thick pall of dust cloud. Imagine a world flung back into chaos. This is an image conceived of a world abandoned to dereliction by doomsday weapons.

According to Samson Option theory, Israel reserves the option to retaliate massively with nuclear weapons when its existence is gravely endangered by the military might of another country although the regime refuses to admit to the possession of a huge nuclear arsenal. As a first sign of a nuclear threat, in the 1973 Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement) War considered to be the fiercest Arab-Israeli conflict, when Arab forces were about to defeat Israeli forces, the Zionist Prime Minister Golda Meir ordered that 13 nuclear bombs be readied to be used either by missiles or by aircraft. And President Nixon agreed to the Israeli demand. In fact, the Samson Option is a horrific plan drawn up by Israel leaders to take down the Middle East and the entire world if necessary and proclaimed ‘kosher’. Pulitzer Prize-winning author Seymour M. Hersh hypothesized that “Should war break out in the Middle East again and should the Syrians and the Egyptians break through again as they did in 1973 [Yom Kippur War], or should any Arab nation fire missiles again at Israel, as Iraq did [in the 1991 Gulf War], a nuclear escalation, once unthinkable except as a last resort, would now be a strong possibility.”

Israel test-fired a missile on November 2, 2011 which it said was capable of carrying a nuclear warhead and targeting any part of the Middle East including Iran.

Israeli officials maintain that the nuclear-capable missile can hit any target within the range of 10,000 kilometers. In other words, it can hit even Russia, China or any part in Europe.

It is now public knowledge that Tel Aviv is a powerful nuclear regime which has at its disposal a huge arsenal surmised to accommodate 300 to 400  nuclear warheads. Israelis have long been mum on the issue and still decline to acknowledge the existence of this nuclear arsenal.

In his revealing book “The Samson Option” (1991), Seymour Hersh argues that the idea of producing nuclear weapons was initially articulated by Israeli military leader Moshe Dayan in early 1968. Since then, Israel began to produce three to five bombs a year. After all, Israel started its illegal nuclear activities back in 1950 in Dimona, an Israeli city in the Negev desert, as it was geographically ideal for such clandestine activities. If we take Hersh’s words for granted, Israel is expected to possess more than 200 nuclear bombs by now.  The Zionist regime inked an agreement with France early in the sixties and received required materials for commencing a nuclear weapons program including a reactor, a factory for extracting plutonium and the design. The French helped build an underground plutonium processing facility for Israel in 1962 which was completed 1965. The Israeli kept tight security in and around the perimeter of the nuclear facility and in 1973 they shot down a passenger Libyan plane flying in the vicinity and killed 104 passengers. The regime was reportedly ranked sixth in producing nuclear bombs in the sixties. Other required materials such as uranium and heavy water were also provided by Norway, France, and the United States.

An operation codenamed Plumbat was jointly carried out by Mossad and LAKAM (An intelligence-gathering agency of Israel’s Defense Ministry for stealing technology for Dimona.) in spearheading the Israeli nuclear weapons efforts. A German freighter with a cargo of 200 tons of uranium oxide suddenly disappeared. When it was found in a Turkish port, the cargo was gone. Later, it became obvious that it had been transferred to an Israeli ship thanks to the joint efforts of Mossad and LAKAM.

Before Seymour Hersh shed light on the nightmarish aspects of the Israeli nuclear bombs, it was Mordechai Vanunu, a former technician at Dimona who brought Israel’s nuclear weapons program to the attention of international community. In 1986, Mordechai Vanunu, a leftist supporter of Palestinian rights, smuggled dozens of pictures and documents out of Dimona and gave them to the London Sunday Times. The pictures and documents proved that Israel was in possession of a sizeable nuclear arsenal i.e. as many as 200 highly sophisticated thermonuclear bombs. The documents also revealed that the Dimona’s capacity had increased drastically over the years and that Israel was producing 1.2 kilograms of plutonium on a weekly basis, enough to make 10 to 12 bombs per year. However, Vanunu paid the price for these disclosures and spent 18 years in prison including 11 years in solitary confinement.

Dimona reactor dome

Israel follows a policy of nuclear opacity. In other words, the regime is advised not to acknowledge or deny the possession of nuclear weapons. Mum is the word in Israeli nuclear policy. In a secret meeting in 1968 between Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir and US President Richard Nixon, the two parties came to the agreement that as long as Israel refused to declare the possession of nukes publicly or test them, the United States would endure and screen the regime’s nuclear program. This has ever since become an indispensable part of US-Israeli policy. However, in 2006, incoming US Defense Secretary Robert Gates told a senate committee in a momentary lapse of reason (?) that Israel has nuclear weapons.

This has actually changed nothing concerning Israel’s nuclear program over the years and Washington’s officials have voiced their constant support for Israel and its security. In July, 2011, US President Barack Obama even reassured Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Washington’s unreserved support for the regime, “We strongly believe that, given its size, its history, the region that it’s in . . . Israel has unique security requirements. It’s got to be able to respond to threats. . . . And the United States will never ask Israel to take any steps that would undermine [its] security interests.”

The story of Israel’s nuclear weapons program is a painfully sad one and the fact that some European countries secretly catapulted this regime into a nuclear nightmare is a shame. However, it is more than a shame when one contemplates that during all these years the US has been aware of these clandestine illegal activities and even supported them.

The worst is yet to come.

With over 300 to 400 nuclear bombs, Israel has been translated into an image of apocalyptic horror for the entire Middle East if not for the world.

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on How Nuclear Can IsrHell Be?

Radio Discussion Breaches Evil Taboo – The ‘Chosen’ Supremacy


Video/Radio Youtube gets down and dirty telling taboo truth

by Tom Valentine

Host Mark Glenn, Ken O’Keefe and Jonathan Azaziah outline the essence of the “Jewish question.” In Videos below.

The greatest taboo in modern media times—the racist, supremacist beliefs fostered by Jews—was breached on Internet radio like marines charging to the beach out of a P-boat.

While the Zionist media constantly badgers Muslims for not addressing their fanatics,—this video discussion splits open the biggest blood-blister of all—the real reason Jews draw so much fire and ire from rest of world.

Last year this column reviewed Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, which is the most thorough, analytical and detailed coverage of the worldwide struggle against the “chosen racists” ever penned. Controversy of Zion; Tragic History

Today, because of the free Internet, people, who want the truth are getting truth they never heard before.


The following two paragraphs are taken from comments to an Internet story. I underlined the salient phrase in second graph. Where, did this person get history cited?

“A very strong pro-muslim piece. It is a shame that they think that Jews (Israelis) are horrible people. When will the Muslim world learn that it is EVIL to hate Jews just for being Jews. If they can hate Jews for no reason then why should I listen to them. All they want to do is kill me just for being Jewish.

They have started 5, 6, 7 wars against Israel since it birth in 1947. In each case their armies numbered more than our entire population. So, we celebrate another Jewish holiday – They tried to kill us, they lost, we won, let’s eat. Do you know that after so many wars of annihilation it gets downright boring. When will you learn. With G-d as our protector you cannot defeat us. And we do not start wars, either.”

Finally, here is a new documentary film That every

Neocon, oxymoron, Hannity listener should watch.

It’s Good propaganda from Gallup organization: Are American Jews fed up with Israel?

In this final video, see how the Zionist shill tries too hard to shape the discussion.


Related Posts:

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Radio Discussion Breaches Evil Taboo – The ‘Chosen’ Supremacy

Jewish Human Rights Advocate Visits Iran – Zionazis Go Berserk!


Listen to my interview with Elias Davidsson: 



Elias Davidsson is the son of German-Jewish holocaust survivors who migrated to Occupied Palestine.A human rights activist and researcher who has proved that the alleged 19 hijackers were innocent and framed for 9/11, No Evidence Muslims Hijacked Planes 911 Elias Davidsson.

Elias recently visited Iran as part of a peace delegation – and was viciously attacked by Zionists when he got home to Germany! “We were met by a barrage of hateful blogs and thereafter mainstream media attacks, for having met ‘the butcher’ of Teheran who ‘denies the Holocaust’ and threatens to ‘annihilate Israel.’” Sounds like Germany is still being run by nazi types – only now they’re zio-nazis! (And yes, know some of you will say that’s an insult to the Nazis, who at least knew how to run an economy.)


Report on a visit to Iran

by Elias Davidsson, 6 May 2012

Between 19 and 29 April 2012, I had the opportunity and pleasure to visit the Islamic Republic of Iran with a group of 15 German intellectuals. I will attempt to summarize my numerous impressions.


In 2011 I was invited by Dr. Yavuz Özuguz (the tall person with the gray beard) , who manages the Muslim website Islam-Market and leads a local Shi’a community in North Germany, to participate in a trip to Iran he intended to organize. For the first time, Dr Özuguz intended to organize a trip to Iran by a group of non-Muslims whom he knew to be committed to justice and peace. An Iranian NGO would host us but we had to pay our airfare.

At that time I was already aware that what Western mass-media reported about Iran was tendencious and partly untrue. I knew that Iran was a relatively modern state which emphasizes education and science; in which the majority of university students are female; where the largest Jewish community in the Middle-East (outside Israel) lives, and where excellent films are produced. I was also aware that Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (in the center of the photograph) was neither an antisemite, a Holocaust denier or a dangerous person, but – as I discovered by reading his addresses to the General Assembly of the United Nations – one of the most progressive statesmen in today’s world. I also was aware of the accusations leveled by Western governments and NGOs against Iran, particularly in the field of human rights. It was obvious to me that if I were to accept the invitation to Iran, Iran’s enemies would tar me after my return as a friend of an “antisemitic dictator” who endangers world peace. I decided nevertheless to accept this invitation.

Before we left, we were invited over refreshments and food to the home of Dr. Özuguz, who introduced us to Shi’a Islam and to the country and people of Iran. This meeting provided me with the opportunity to meet him and his lovely family as well as my travel companions, some of whom I had already known through email contacts. This coming-together was by itself an unforgettable event for me, due mainly to the warm personality and friendliness of our hosts.

The trip

On April 19, 2012 we all met at the Hamburg airport. After an unexpected customs check, in which German officials searched in our handbags for “secret technological documents” that might have violated Germany’s embargo against Iran, we embarked and enjoyed a trip with Iran Air.

After our arrival at Imam Khomeini airport outside Teheran in the late evening, a delegation of our hosts met us and invited us to refreshments before bringing us to a luxurious hotel. The personnel from the host organisation, Ebn Sina, accompanied us throughout the visit in Iran and tried to accommodate all our wishes as much as they could. Without their diligent organisation, we could not have managed to accomplish all we did within 9 days.

It is, evidently, impossible to get a thorough impression of a country such as Iran in 9 days. It would require more than one lifetime to do so, if at all. Our hosts were, of course, committed to show us only what they considered as valuable. To learn about the down side of Iran there was no need to travel. It would have sufficed to read Western newspapers, which systematically vilify and demonize the Islamic Republic and its leaders.

On the way from the airport to the hotel we experienced our first impressions. All of us were surprised by the modern infrastructure we perceived along the way and the cleanliness of the streets. Although past midnight, traffic was heavy. These sights unwittingly called forth in my memory the first trip I made to the USA in 1960. Arriving to New York, I was so shocked by the shabbiness and dirt that I saw from the bus bringing us to Manhattan that I wanted to return immediately to Europe. The contrast to Tehran 2012 could not be greater.

I find it difficult to summarize my Iran impressions in the requisite compactness. A mere listing of our meetings, visits and lectures would not communicate the depth of these impressions. A couple of my co-travelers wrote an essay about their impression they entitled “The land of love”. That designation was prompted by the fact that the word “love” was repeatedly pronounced by those whom we met. They did not use that word in the commercial sense as abused by Western business nor in the hypocritical sense used by numerous christian preachers, but in relation to Iran’s policies. Who would dream that Western politicians would talk of God’s grace and the love of God to justify their worldly policies? Everywere we went, we encountered friendliness, hospitality and thoughtfulness. Iranians are indeed known for their high regards for politeness and thoughtfulness.

Our hosts of the Foundation Ebn Sina emphasized repeatedly the Islamic character of Iran. As most of us were secular people, such emphasis was rather obnoxious. But it would be unfair to blame our hosts for their insistence because it impossible to understand today’s Iran without considering its religious basis and knowing something about Shi’a Islam. We also found out that numerous Iranians found the constant barrage of religious messages, as well as the quasi obligatory hijab that all women in Iran carry, highly irritating. I am certain that if the authorities would lift the rule on the hijab, the majority of women would stop wearing it. Nevertheless, a substantial portion of the Iranian people is deeply religious and would probably not accept the secularization of the regime in the near future. Religion plays a major role in the daily lives of millions of Iranians and will probably do so for the foreseeable future. Shi’ite Islam, as practiced in Iran, combines piety with the promotion of scientific knowledge, as reflected in the high standards of education. Many of those we met and who have not lived in the West could not fathom that most of us were non-believers.

Our hosts attempted to acquaint us with Shi’ite Islam, partly by emphasizing its links to Christianiany. Thus, an Islamic scholar, Ayatollah al-Shirazi, emphasized in a lecture he made the role of Mary, Jesus’ mother, who is revered as much as Fatima, the daughter of the Prophet Mohamed. Equally were Jewish prophets presented as part of Muslim heritage and deserving respect. Our hosts appear to have believed that we needed to be reminded, again and again, that Islam was not an enemy of Judaism and Christianity.

One lecturer explained to us the principle of Imamat, namely the attributes a person must possess in order to be eligible to become an imam. Some of these attributes were specifically Islamic while 8-10 of these attributes did not relate to religious beliefs and were thus applicable to any person. Among such attributes were superior knowledge of statescraft, wisdom, steadfastness, modesty, honesty, courage and the love of human beings. Indeed, the highest office holder in Iran, Imam Khameini, is legally required to lead an austere life. How would politics look in the West if office holders were required to demonstrate such qualities?

After the death of Imam Khomeini, the leader of the Islamic revolution, an expert commission of 85 Islamic scholars (elected by the population) elected his successor, Imam Syyed Ali Khameini, who is currently the supreme spiritual leader in Iran. This commission’s mandate is also to monitor the Supreme Leader and ensure that he abides by Islamic law. In parallel, the population elects the parliament and the president in direct, secret, elections.

Unique to Iran are the prerogatives of the Supreme Spiritual Leader. According to the Constitution, he is not only the spiritual leader of the nation and thus represents, as it were, the spirit of the Prophet (Mohammad) but represents the supreme commander of the Iranian armed forces. Thus, his statements on war and peace possess greater weight than even those of the President. His position on nuclear weapons is unequivocal. He repeatedly stated that Iran will not and cannot acquire nuclear weapons because these are inhuman and incompatible with the principles of Islam. He in parallel called for the establishment of a nuclear-free zone in the Middle-East, an appeal rejected mainly by the State of Israel and its western backers. Finally, he urged the states of the world to work for the total abolition of weapons of mass-destruction, a call rejected by NATO member states. Western media do not relish to report these facts, preferring to promote distrust and hate against the Iranian leadership. Enemies of Iran have a hard time to believe that Imam Khameini is honest and bound by religious and ethical norms because they themselves do not consider ethical and religious norms as binding.

We visited also the grandiose Iranian parliament (Majlees), where we attended a noisy debate about the status of teachers and met a few members of parliament for a short exchange. Among them were MPs representing the Jewish, Christian, Sunnite and Zoroastrian communities. According to the Iranian constitution, each of these minorities is entitled to at least one member in parliament.

One of the highlights in Iran was for me the visit to the National Library. Apart from the exquisite architecture of the building, its spaciousness and friendly athmosphere, I was highly impressed by the modern facilities offered to the users, including for the blind, facilities seldom found even in European university libraries. The library houses over 1.5 million books, a huge collection of old manuscripts, mostly in Farsi (Persian) and innumerable scientific journals published in Farsi. Glancing over the English titles of articles published in these journals, I found that the level of inquiry in Iranian social and physical sciences was as high as anywhere in the West.

Our hosts surprised us by organizing an audience with Iran’s President, Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. After making what amounted to a philosophical lecture (unfortunately badly translated), he spent a few minutes talking to our group. His demeanor confirmed his known modesty and moderation. Even when he mentioned in his lecture the threats and attacks leveled by the United States and Israel against his country, he never demonstrated any hatred or anger towards those countries or their peoples.

Elias Davidsson

I did not manage to inquire sufficiently about social and economic policies nor about the situation of human rights. We had, however, an opportunity to meet the President’s advisor for women’s affairs. She informed us about family and inheritance rights, and dispelled some wrong ideas that we had about Islamic family law. According to her, there exist in Iran approximately 8,000 women’s associations (NGOs), organized into several national federations. These networks consult the President’s advisor with regard to families’, women’s and children issues. It became apparent to me that Iranian women do not need the motherly assistance of their “emancipated” Western sisters to defend their rights. Their self-confidence convinced me that they are capable to defend their rights, thank you very much.

We were told that the working week in Iran is 30 hours and that women and men receive equal salaries for equal work. If this is really the case (something we had no time to have confirmed), Iran would be in advance over Western countries in this matter.

An interesting insight into Islamic criminal law emerged as a result of my question regarding the death penalty. As an opponent of the death penalty I expressed my concern regarding the number of death sentences in Iran. What I did not know is that most death sentences in Iran are not carried out because the families of the victims (or the victims themselves in cases such as rape or assault) can and do “forgive” the attacker. According to Islamic law, judges are bound to suggest to the victims or their representatives to “forgive” the defendant, rather to demand a revenge (punishment). Victims or their representatives are not, however, obliged to forgive and can insist that the sentence, whichever it is, be carried out according to the principle “eye-for-eye”. By that mechanism, victims or their families, take upon themselves the psychological burden of deciding the fate of the defendant. This system may explain why many prefer forgiveness to revenge.

When the Security Council of the United Nations imposed in August 1990 economic sanctions against Iraq, it caused almost immediately food shortages in the country. The reason was that Iraq at the time imported 70 percent of its food needs, a great deal from the United States. The Islamic Republic of Iran avoided such vulnerability: Iran produces most of its own foodstuffs and most medicines. It also encourages industrial production to reduce imports, domestic scientific research and technological innovation. Today Iran not only produces a substantial portion of its own motor vehicles but develops space technology, biotechnology and nanotechnology.

Does a scientifically developed Iran represents a threat to world peace? Enemies of Iran, including the Zionists, do not tire to demonize the Islamic Republic, accusing it of evil intentions. It is difficult to know whether such accusations are based on lack of knowledge or on malice. One fact is undisputed. Contrary to the United States and Israel, whose history of aggressive wars is well documented, Iran has not attacked any country for centuries. There is no basis for imputing to Iran aggressive intentions. Iran’s leaders are led by a religion of peace and by the wish to share their faith with others.

The political system of the Islamic Republic of Iran is in some respects unique in this world. It can be regarded – with some reservations – as an experiment following the theology of liberation that was so opposed by the Vatican. The Islamic revolution is celebrated by many Muslims in a similar way as communists celebrate the October 1917 revolution, namely as an act of liberation from oppression. The Iranian revolution is, however, only 33 years of age and can either mature or disintegrate. The Iranian leadership are still groping with internal and external challenges and are, as any human beings, fallible. They attempt to maintain the revolutionary zeal, prevent corrupting influences from the imperialist countries, fend off foreign attempts at destabilisation, and ensure the well-being of the population. It is easy for Westerners to criticize the Islamic Republic for some of its oppressive policies. It must be remembered that Western democracies have evolved over centuries to what they are today and still cannot be regarded as democratic or socially just. Iran must be left in peace to find its own way. The people of Iran are well educated and can be relied to ensure their own future without the help of foreign invaders. Western countries, whose history comprises the enslavement of African people, the extermination of the North American natives, and two world wars, should learn some humility before lecturing Iran.

I ask myself what are the deep reasons for the West’s alleged fear from Iran. Is it because Iran attempts to free itself from the grip of global capital or represents a thriving alternative to wild capitalism, an alternative that might appear attractive to more nations and endanger the imperialist system? I should at this point add that no one we talked to in Iran believed that his or her country will be attacked by Israel or the United States. We found no fear, panic or concern among Iranians. They are all busy with their lives. Construction can be observed everywhere. Real estate prices have increased dramatically in recent years because of high demand. Tourists are most welcome and can look forward to excellent accommodations and an extremely hospitable population. Photographing is allowed virtually everywhere – with the evident exception of military and security installations. Those who claim Iran is a totalitarian state should visit that country and find out by themselves whether such a designation is appropriate.

For a humanist such as myself, Iran was a real discovery. I would gladly visit the country again, for a longer time, visit musicians (I am a composer), enjoy the exquisite sights and air of Isfahan (one of the most beautiful cities I ever visited), and stroll among the friendly crowds. I pray and hope that Western governments will recognize the futility of coercing, threatening or attacking Iran, lift the ineffectual and self-defeating embargo on that country and build up a fruitful cultural and economic cooperation with the Iranian people

Posted in ZIO-NAZI, IranComments Off on Jewish Human Rights Advocate Visits Iran – Zionazis Go Berserk!

9/11: Shattering the Spell of Mythical Realities


by Gavin Phillips


Have we been lied to about 9/11? What kind of world do you want your children to grow up in? By the end of this article you will have the answer to your first question. What you do with the answer will determine your answer to the second question.

Learning the truth about 9/11 is crucially important for several reasons. Two wars were started because of it. Between a hundred thousand and a million Iraqi civilians (1) and thousands of soldiers have been killed because of the so-called war on terror.

The government used 9/11 to grab many of our freedoms. The Patriot Act has gutted the Bill of Rights, as well as intrusive new government bureaucracies like ‘Homeland Security’ performing airport strip searches.

This article reviews critically important evidence that contradicts key aspects of the official version of 9/11. This evidence has either been ignored by the mainstream media or smeared with the mind-numbingly absurd label of ‘conspiracy theory’.

Before moving on, it’s worth familiarising yourself with the official version of 9/11. In an article by journalist Paul Craig Roberts titled ‘Conspiracy Theory’ he writes, (2)

‘Let’s take a minute to re-acquaint ourselves with the official explanation, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory despite the fact that it comprises an amazing conspiracy.

….a handful of young Muslim Arabs who could not fly air planes, mainly Saudi Arabians who came neither from Iraq nor from Afghanistan, outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI, but also all 16 US intelligence agencies and all intelligence agencies of US allies including Israel’s Mossad.

…they outwitted the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times in the same hour on the same morning and air traffic control…’

The Collapse of World Trade Center 7

Many people are not aware that a third skyscraper collapsed on 9/11 along with the Twin Towers. World Trade Center 7 (WTC7) was a modern steel-framed 47-story building. It was not hit by a plane, yet at around 5.20 pm it collapsed straight down in about 7-seconds. For the first 2.5 seconds (about 100 ft), the top section of the building was in ‘free fall.’ (3)

Free fall means when an object is falling without any resistance to it. So the top part of the building was falling at the same rate as if you dropped a brick off the side of the building.

The only way the top section of WTC7 could go into free fall is if all of the concrete and steel below it was removed virtually instantly. All of the massive 82 support columns were severed within a fraction of a second. This can only be achieved by controlled demolition. (4)

You may have seen examples of controlled demolition on TV or YouTube of vacant buildings that are removed. In controlled demolition the building is not blown up, but blown inwards. Explosives are expertly placed on key columns and ignited with precise timing to make the building collapse in on itself, thereby doing little, if any damage, to surrounding structures.

If you compare controlled demolition videos with the collapse of WTC7, you will see they are the same. WTC7 collapses straight down, in absolute free fall for just over 2-seconds, and very close to free fall for the next 4-5 seconds. It would take experts weeks to plan and carefully place explosives within WTC7 to make it collapse as it did. (5)

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is the government agency that was in charge (took over from FEMA in 2002) of investigating why WTC7 fell. In November 2008 NIST released it’s final report on the collapse of WTC7. It’s conclusion was that WTC7 was ‘the first known instance of the total collapse of a [steel framed] tall building primarily due to fires.’ (6)

It’s worth noting that earlier, in August 2008, NIST had released it’s findings in a Draft for Public Comment. In it they stated that the WTC7 collapse was never in free fall, but ‘was approximately 40% longer than the computed free fall time and was consistent with physical principles.’ (7)

In a technical briefing NIST allowed people to pose questions to NIST investigators. High School physics teacher David Chandler has been investigating 9/11 for many years. Chandler posed a question to the board asking how they could state the buildings initial collapse was 40% longer than free fall, when anyone can easily measure it’s collapse from
available video. (8)

The fact is that NIST amended this part of the final report that was released in November. They admitted that WTC7 was characterized by ‘gravitational acceleration’ for 2.25 seconds (free fall) . They also removed all reference to ‘consistent with physical principles’, (basic Newtonian Physics) because it is not. (9)

As NIST admits, fire has never caused the collapse of any steel framed high rise in the history of their construction. In addition, the fires in WTC7 were small compared to the blazing inferno’s that some high-rises have experienced over the decades. As David Ray Griffin writes,

In 1991, a huge fire in Philadelphia’s One Meridian Plaza lasted for 18 hours and gutted eight of the building’s 38 floors. In Caracas in 2004, a fire in a 50-storey building raged for 17 hours, completely gutting the building’s top 20 floors. In neither case, however, did the building, or even a single floor, collapse.‘ (10)

University of Copenhagen Chemistry Professor Dr. Niels Harrit has been researching 9/11 since 2007. Harrit says, ‘There is no doubt that this building was taken down in a controlled demolition. I consider this to be a mainstream scientific conclusion. There’s no way around
this conclusion.’

It has never happened in history that a steel framed high riser collapsed due to fire. This is a very basic thing in science…science is based on observation and experience. And since there have been maybe 400-600 reported fires in steel-framed high rises and on no occasion has it collapsed due to fire, means the experiment has been done, the conclusion has been drawn. Steel-framed high rises simply do not collapse due to fire.‘ (11)

In addition to the scientific evidence, there was also a key eyewitness who was in WTC7 on 9/11. Barry Jennings was the Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department for the New York City Housing Authority.

Barry Jennings and Michael Hess (New York City’s corporation counsel ) were trapped in WTC7 for around three to four hours on 9/11. (12)

Jennings and Hess reach WTC7 just after 9am. Jennings said when they reached the 23rd floor, the place was empty. There was hot coffee and half eaten sandwiches lying around. Jennings started making some phone calls and one person told him to get out immediately.

They start walking down the stairs to to the lobby.

When we reach the 6th floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way. There was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging. I had to climb back up and I had to walk back up to the 8th floor.

…I was trapped in there for several hours, I was trapped in there when both buildings (twin towers) came down…all this time I’m hearing all kinds of explosions, all this time I’m hearing explosions. And I’m thinking that maybe its the buses around me that were on fire, the cars are on fire. I don’t see no, you know (Jennings moves his arms out) but I’m still hearing these explosions.

When they finally got to us and they took us down to what, what they called the lobby, because I asked them when we got down there, I said where are we? He said ‘this was the lobby’. And I said, you gotta be kidding me. It was total ruins, total ruins. Now keep in mind, when I came in there the lobby had nice escalators, it was a huge lobby, and for me to see what I saw, it was unbelievable.

And the fire-fighter that took us down kept saying ‘do not look down’ and I kept saying why?, he said do not look down, and we were stepping over people, and you know you can feel when you’re stepping over people.’

…when I got home I sat down in front of the TV…I couldn’t stop watching it, and that’s when I found out Building 7 came down. I was so surprised, I was saying to myself, ‘Why did that building come down?’ And I knew why it came down, because of the explosions. (13)

Besides stating that he heard and experienced explosions within WTC7, Jennings testimony caused another problem for the official version. He also says that he was stepping over people, which leads to the conclusion that they were dead. The government says that nobody died in the collapse of WTC7. *

Several other witnesses reported either seeing or hearing explosions just before WTC7 collapsed. (14)

The irrefutable fact is that you cannot reduce a 47-storey steel-framed high rise building into a pile of rubble in about 7 seconds unless explosives are used. No amount of denial, sophistry or attempts at misdirection can change this.

Removal of Forensic Evidence

In any bombing, investigators keep a large amount of the debris in order to carry out forensic studies to determine exactly what happened. But in the case of WTC7 and the Twin Towers, virtually all of the steel was immediately trucked away and shipped off to China and India for recycling.

An article from ‘Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth’ writes, ‘The structural steel was extremely important evidence. Yet this evidence was quickly hauled away by up to 400 trucks per day and taken … where? Not to a secure place to await inspection, but to barges where it was readied for shipping. (15)

Vitally important evidence was destroyed of the most appalling terrorist attack (and one of the most important political events) in world history.

As the Journal Fire Engineering writes, (16)

For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to China.

Architects, Engineers and Scientists

In the last few years hundreds of experts in engineering, building design, physics, chemistry and many more disciplines have stepped forward and stated that the government version
is wrong.

Physics professor Steven Jones is one of these experts. Jones started investigating 9/11 after he watched a presentation in 2005. In November 2005 Jones published his first paper questioning the official version of the collapse of the three buildings, called, ‘Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?’ It was because of Jones continued investigation into 9/11 that Brigham Young University forced him into early retirement in 2006. (17)

In 2009 Jones and 8 other scientists published a peer-reviewed scientific paper in ‘The Open Chemical Physics Journal.’ (18) The scientists studied four different samples of WTC dust. The chain of evidence for the collection of the dust and who gave it to them is documented in the paper.

(* Barry Jennings died under unusual circumstances a few days before the final NIST report was published. His death has never been explained. See footnote 13)

The scientists observed red/gray chips in all four samples of WTC dust. The red/gray chips were analysed using a variety of devices. In their report the scientists state, ‘The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.’ (19)

Their conclusion is that the red portion of the chips is a modern version of thermite, called nano-thermite or super-thermite. One of the scientists, Niels Harrit, says nano-thermite ‘can be used as an explosive or an incendiary for cutting steel structures‘. (20)

Nano-thermite is extremely hard to make (especially circa 2001) and is created starting at the atomic level. It is almost exclusively created by western military laboratories.

The scientific paper, ‘Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe’ was published in February 2009 and circulated to many scientists and politicians through the world. As of this writing (April 2012) it’s findings, or an alternative reason for nano-thermite to be found in the WTC dust, has not been published by any scientist in a peer reviewed paper.

People have asked if nano-thermite could be created spontaneously as the buildings collapsed, or if the red/gray chips are from the steel or primer paint used in the building. Jones states that they compared the chemical composition of the unreacted chips against the primer paint and steel. They are completely different. Besides, it is impossible for an explosive/pyrotechnic material as complex as nano-thermite to be created from particles of a falling building. As Niels Harrit states, they should never find nano-thermite in the WTC dust. (21)

The scientists also found large amounts of tiny, spherical, iron-rich microspheres in the WTC dust. The finding of microspheres is verified by two other independent studies of the WTC dust; by the RJ Lee Group (22) and the U.S. Geological Survey. Iron microspheres are a by-product of the thermitic reaction. The tiny droplets of melted metal become round as they move through the air.

A BBC program ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 – The Third Tower’ suggested that the iron-rich microspheres were produced from cutting tools used to break up the steel in the clean-up after 9/11. But one of the samples of WTC dust was collected about 10-minutes after the collapse of the second tower, long before the clean-up started. (23)

In addition, pools of molten metal was reported by fireman and other eye-witnesses in the basement rubble of the twin towers and WTC7. (24)

Dr. Keith Eaton toured Ground Zero and stated in The Structural Engineer,

‘They showed us many fascinating slides’ [Eaton] continued, ‘ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster’ (25)
For six months after Sept. 11, the ground temperature varied between 600 degrees Fahrenheit and 1,500 degrees, sometimes higher. “In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel,” Fuchek said. (26)
The government has ignored these eyewitness statements because molten metal does not fit in with there explanation. It is impossible for office fires (or jet fuel) to produce anywhere near the heat necessary to melt steel. But thermite and nano-thermite can.

Richard Gage founded ‘Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth’ (AE9/11Truth) in 2006 after hearing a radio interview with author David Ray Griffin. The group’s mission statement ‘is to research, compile, and disseminate scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice.’

The group now represents over 1600 architects and engineers who have independently reviewed the evidence for all three building collapses. They all conclude that explosives were used to cause their collapse. Below are two statements.

Kathy McGrade B.S. Metallurgical Engineering with 30 years of experience states,

The way I got into doing 9/11 research was when a friend asked me if [office] fires could melt steel…no, it can’t, not an office fire. A blast furnace can melt steel because you are driving lots of oxygen into a closed furnace. In an office fire you cannot generate enough heat to melt steel.

…yet we have evidence of molten iron in the microspheres, in the rubble pile and the metal pouring out of the side of the tower. And the more and more I looked into it, the more I was horrified by what I saw.

…I believe there are three smoking guns, and one of them is the microspheres that were found in three different samples from three independent researchers. The R.J Lee Company, the USGS and Dr. Stephen Jones work, all three separately found these microspheres. They are perfectly round, you cannot get a perfectly round sphere of metal from the building tearing apart. The only way you can get that is by starting with a molten liquid. A liquid will create the perfectly round sphere as it solidifies. There’s no other way you could get that. That’s one of the smoking guns.

The other I think is David Chandlers work which is excellent, the 2.25 second free fall of building 7…then the third one is, it is very well explained in the article ‘The missing Jolt.’ (27)

Michael Donly is a structural engineer,

When news came that the towers had been hit by an air plane we put on the television and proceeded to watch…I never suspected that the towers were going to collapse; none of us in that room, none of the experienced engineers that I work with made a comment that ‘wow, I think those towers are going to come down…none of us felt that that was going to happen. For months after that I felt that my engineering judgement was called into question, why didn’t I realize that was going to happen.

About 2-years later I had a friend that asked me if it was possible for the twin towers to achieve near free-fall speed when they collapsed. And I thought about that, I have a physics background…that made me think and it led me into doing my own research into the FEMA report, the 9/11 Commission Report; finally the NIST report.

I went through those reports exhaustively; I wanted to know what happened. You know, my country was attacked, I’m a structural engineer and I want to know the facts. So I did my own research and quickly realized that you know, my judgement wasn’t suspect, that the towers should not have collapsed.

…there were a lot of reasons we didn’t think the towers were going to collapse. We weren’t alone. The chiefs of the FDNY (Fire Department of New York) sent there men into those buildings because they didn’t suspect those buildings would collapse. We’ve never had a steel-framed skyscraper collapse in the United States, or internationally (due to fire).

…with regard to building 7…building 7 was not hit by an air plane, yet it came down later in the day, apparently due to small fires spread throughout the building, and fell into its own footprint, at near free-fall acceleration. This is the smoking gun of 9/11. (28)

The hundreds of engineers, scientists and other experts have all independently researched the collapse of the three towers and concluded that the official version is impossible. Decades of experience tells them that WTC7 could never collapse straight down in under 7-seconds due to scattered office fires.

They know these facts to such a certainty that they have risked their careers and reputations to inform us about it. They didn’t do it only from a scientific and engineering point of fact, but also to help their country.

So what do we hear from the mainstream media? They try to write these courageous American’s off as ‘conspiracy theorists’. This label has been redefined to mean that the critic is delusional.

It’s really appalling, but this is the degenerate point at which the mainstream media finds itself these days. Instead of a vigilant ‘Fourth Estate’ keeping us informed about government malfeasance, they work tirelessly in lock-step with the government in enforcing the official lie about 9/11. They omit facts that contradict it and try to silence all dissent with worthless
name-calling. As Saman Mohammadi writes in his blog Truth Excavator,

The most dangerous and anti-democratic rhetorical tool of thought control is the blanket label of “conspiracy theory.” This thought-killing label is repeated in the mainstream chorus…it is anti-reality, anti-truth, anti-debate and anti-democracy… (29)

The only way the government could maintain their lie about 9/11 for over ten years is with the obsequious subservience of the mainstream media. They haven’t been in the journalism business for a very long time; their business is the dissemination of government lies and propaganda.

Denial and Logical Fallacies
We are addicted to our beliefs’
Michael Talbot

We all have a tendency to ignore or deny facts that challenge deeply held beliefs and world-views. We have a deep emotional connection to 9/11. To find out that the government has been lying about it can cause cognitive dissonance; we subconsciously suppress it.

But we all know where denial will lead us; more government lies to start more murderous wars in our name. And keeping us in a panicked state with claims about false terrorist threats in order to take more of our civil liberties.

Researcher David Chandler talks about how he had to go through a certain amount of conscience raising before he could grasp the gravity of the truth about 9/11. Niels Harrit also states that it took him about 2-weeks and watching the collapse of WTC7 many times before he could come to terms with what it meant.

Sometimes we are misdirected from the truth by deceptive arguments. A logical fallacy masquerading as an argument has arisen in recent years and goes something likes this. If the government is covering up that explosives caused the collapse of WTC7 then they must be in on it. Governments cannot keep large secrets, there would always be whistle-blowers. So the official version must be right. *

This is of course complete speculation. How many people in the government who might be in on it or how many whistle-blowers there should be has absolutely nothing to do with the fact of an explosive induced virtual free-fall collapse of WTC7.

Who did it and why?

I do not know exactly who is responsible for 9/11 or why they did it. I do know that al-Qaeda could never have had the unrestricted access to the three towers (for many months) to rig them with tons of explosives.

It’s highly unlikely that al-Qaeda had the technical expertise to create nano-thermite, or the demolition expertise to create a perfect implosion of WTC7. This is what we will learn with an independent investigation.

(* People who subscribe to this fallacy seem to miss the fact that the same argument can be levelled at al-Qaeda. How did they manage to keep this massive secret for so long while planning 9/11?)

Taking back our Country

It does not take a majority to prevail… but rather an irate, tireless minority,
keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.
  – Samuel Adams

We have forgotten that our elected politicians are here to serve us, not the other way around.
We know that power often corrupts, but we have two ways to try and keep politicians in check; firstly by a politically aware and questioning public. Secondly our Constitution and Bill of Rights were put in place to guarantee our freedoms and to limit government powers. As Thomas Jefferson writes,

In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution

But the truth is that we have not been questioning, critical or watchful of our politicians for quite some time. We’ve allowed ourselves to be distracted by sports, celebrity and TV trivia. We’ve allowed the politicians to systematically destroy our Constitution and Bill of Rights, and this is where we find ourselves.

But that’s all about to change and this leads us to a third question, How do we take back our Country? Research 9/11 for yourself and share it. Engage people in a real debate about the issues we are facing today because of 9/11. Organize and get people to sign a petition for a real independent investigation (with subpoena powers) into 9/11.

Spread the word via Face book, Twitter, My Space, myYearbook etc. and news blogs. Use email chain letters and pass this article onto everyone in your address book, and recommend that they do the same.

Other ways to get the word out include; public speeches; letters of opposition or support; caricatures, symbols; banners and posters; boycotts, marches, non-cooperation, sit-ins.

Final Thoughts

Jane Pollicino

(lost her husband Steve on 9/11)

The country owns this. We were all victims. We all should want answers. We all lost something that day.

Ellen Mariani

(lost her husband Louis on 9/11)

We will never heal… we have to demand a new investigation. I want justice here.


We lost nearly 3000 fellow Americans on 9/11 and thousands more have sacrificed their lives in unnecessary wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. We owe it to the families, to ourselves and our country to demand a thorough investigation into 9/11.

On 9/11 a false reality was woven into our consciences. From the very first day, while the emotional trauma was still fresh, the mind and social conditioning began. A terrorist group was conjured up, al-Qaeda, along with its demonic leader Osama Bin Laden and 19 Muslim hijackers. It was repeated constantly by the government controlled media. That myth has been used to create the world we live in today.

We are at a pivotal point in our history and world history. 9/11 was the catalysing world event for justifying wars, hundreds of thousands dead, an ever expanding police state and its all based on a massive lie about what really happened and who is responsible. I leave you now with the words from two distinguished Americans.

September 11, 2001 seems destined to be the watershed event of our lives and the greatest test for our democracy in our lifetimes. The evidence of government complicity in the lead-up to the events, the failure to respond during the event, and the astounding lack of any meaningful investigation afterwards, as well as the ignoring of evidence turned up by others that renders the official explanation impossible, may signal the end of the American experiment. It has been used to justify all manners of measures to legalize repression at home and as a pretext for behaving as an aggressive empire abroad. Until we demand an independent, honest, and thorough investigation and accountability for those whose action and inaction led to those events and the cover-up, our republic and our Constitution remain in the gravest danger.

Lt. Col. Shelton F. Lankford
Retired U.S. Marine Corps fighter pilot with
over 300 combat missions flown.

Cowardice asks the question – is it safe?
Expediency asks the question – is it politic?
Vanity asks the question – is it popular?
But conscience asks the question – is it right?
And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe,
nor politic, nor popular; but one must take it because it is right.
  – Martin Luther King Jr


1 Gives four sources

Another source

2 Conspiracy Theory by Paul Craig Roberts

3 WTC7 in Freefall: No Longer Controversial

David Chandler
David Chandler says he measures 2.5 seconds in freefall. NIST stated 2.25 seconds for freefall.

4 Architects & Engineers – Solving the Mystery of WTC 7 (AE9/11Truth)

5 Ibid

6 ’9/11 Ten Years Later’ by David Ray Griffin Pg 40

7 Ibid Pg 45

8 David Chandler set of videos of the NIST Public Draft for Public Comment

9 ’9/11 Ten Years Later’ by David Ray Griffin Pg 48
NIST stated 2.25 seconds for freefall. David Chandler says he measures 2.5 seconds in freefall.

10 Ibid Pg 41

11 ‘Face to Face’ interview with Dr. Niels Harrit

First 9 seconds of the interview

12 There is some discrepency as to how long Hess and Jennings were trapped in WTC7.
History Commons documents that Jennings and Hess were rescued around 12.10 pm. But in the interview with Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas (below), Jennings says he did not get out until around 1pm
12:10 p.m.-12:15 p.m. September 11, 2001: Firefighters Rescue Three People Trapped in WTC 7

13 Interview with Barry Jennings by Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas

Dylan Avery is interviewed about his interview with Barry Jennings, as well as Jennings sudden death on August 19th 2008. Avery got a friend to hire a private detective to investigate the Jennings death.

Posted in USAComments Off on 9/11: Shattering the Spell of Mythical Realities

TO: Mossad/Shabbak RE: Your Vendetta against Israeli Nuclear Whistle Blower, Vanunu Mordechai


by Eileen Fleming


On May 2, 2012, Israeli press reported that the Military Censor announced that the Israeli Defense Forces have launched a new system to monitor information on Facebook, Twitter, blogs and news sites.

“The new system will examine information using keywords labeled in advance.” [1]

On 22 April, I TWEETED to Vanunu @vanunuvmjc @60Minutes @IsraelinUSA @PresidentPeres @netanyahu@whitehouse SECURITY ALERT RE: Israel’s WMD and VANUNU

None replied, but my message got through to Power for Vanunu disappeared from TWITTER a few hours after I received this message on May 1st via a private FB message from Vanunu Mordechai

Today they sent first notice, they will renew the restrictions.sent to my Lawyer.
Now you are free,we can close the Cause.either you do it or I will do it. I am going to deactivate my Facebook,very soon.

A few hours later, Vanunu Mordechai’s image at Free Mordechai Vanunu had become a ghost. A few days later I resumed my previous position as lone administrator, but that is another long story and as this is an ongoing series I punt it forward.

Free Mordechai Vanunu currently are 5,536 strong and new members join daily. No doubt the least we are doing is being a gnat in the eye, a mosquito on the neck and a royal pain in the ass to all who want the world to forget that all Vanunu did twenty-six years ago was tell the truth and provide the photographic proof that led nuclear physicist, Frank Barnaby to testify at Vanunu’s closed door trial:

“I found Vanunu very straightforward about his motives for violating Israel’s secrecy laws he explained to me that he believed that both the Israeli and the world public had the right to know about the information he passed on. He seemed to me to be acting ideologically.

“Israel’s political leaders have, he said, consistently lied about Israel’s nuclear-weapons programme and he found this unacceptable in a democracy. The knowledge that Vanunu had about Israel’s nuclear weapons, about the operations at Dimona, and about security at Dimona could not be of any use to anyone today. He left Dimona in October 1985.” [2]

Now, as Vanunu had sent out less than thirty TWEETS to less than thirty followers, the very fact that he disappeared from TWITTER and Facebook is no doubt due to pressure from SECURITY/Mossad/Shabbak and their many helpers known as Sayanim, who monitor this reporter.

I invite all to read me, but WHY can’t we talk? After all, I have sent YOU via Vanunu’s gmail and yahoo accounts many alerts to my articles about Vanunu with the Subject: SECURITY ALERT!

And here’s WHY I do, what I do and WHY I won’t shut up:

“Write about what disturbs you, particularly if it bothers no one else” is a line in “The HELP” by Kathryn Stockett.

When I read it, I took it as a message from God, for that is exactly what i have been doing since THAT DAY we call 9/11

THAT DAY and This 9/11

And after a serendipitous meeting with Vanunu on the first day of summer in 2005, which was five days before I departed back to USA from my first of seven trips to Israel Palestine, we began a series of interviews focused on his childhood in an Orthodox Jewish home in Marrakech. I was most interested in his crisis of faith and culture which began when his family resettled in Beersheba in 1963.

16 Days in Palestine

Vanunu was nine while America was grieving the incomprehensible loss of President Kennedy and I am nine months older than Vanunu. My initial interest was and remains in Vanunu’s welfare which requires his freedom from 24/7 surveillance and the right to fade into the world. As a sister/friend, I pray for his endurance in what I see as his crucifixion of twenty-six years because he told The TRUTH about Israel’s nukes and became a Christian-the ‘unpardonable sin’ for particular Jews.

Read more…

A few weeks before being kidnapped by the Mossad in 1986, Vanunu stumbled into Christianity and within minutes of emerging from his windowless tomb sized cell on 21 April 2004, Vanunu announced,

“I am not harming Israel. I am not interested in Israel. I want to tell you something very important. I suffered here 18 years because I am a Christian, because I was baptized into Christianity. If I was a Jew I wouldn’t have all this suffering here in isolation for 18 years. Only because I was a Christian man.”

On April 30, 2007, the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court, convicted Vanunu on 14 [out of 21] counts of violating a court order prohibiting him from speaking to foreign journalists.

Vanunu was also convicted for traveling from Jerusalem to Bethlehem when he hoped to attend Christmas Eve mass at the Church of the Nativity, his first Christmas after being released from 18 years in jail.

On July 2, 2007, Israel sentenced Vanunu to six months in jail for speaking to foreign media in 2004.

Two days before President Bush’s first trip to Israel and a day before Vanunu’s appeal was to begin, Israel sentenced him to community service instead.
On Feb. 5, 2008, Vanunu met with prison officials to arrange community service and learned that to his “surprise they say there is no community service in East Jerusalem. I told them the agreement for community service was on this condition that it will be only in the East Jerusalem. They say no one told them about this… I will do community service in the East Jerusalem or the appeal begins and may be the prison sentence.”

On September 23, 2008, the Jerusalem District Court reduced Vanunu’s sentence to three months, “In light of (Vanunu’s) ailing health and the absence of claims that his actions put the country’s security in jeopardy.”

In November 2009, Vanunu suffered another crisis of faith and “fired God” from his case.

He emailed me the long version of his spin on 1 Corinthians 13, but also went public on his You Tube Channel:

vanunuvmjc posted a comment

” And if I know all mysteries and all knowledge, and speak in the tongues of men and angels, BUT HAVE NO FREEDOM, I am NOTHING. And if I have all faith so as to remove mountains, but have not FREEDOM, I am NOTHING.”

vanunuvmjc posted a comment

1 FREEDOM 13:1-13 If I speak in the tongues of men and angels, but have not FREEDOM, I have become sounding brass or a tinkling symbol. And if I have prophecy and know all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have all faith so as to remove mountains, but have not FREEDOM, I am nothing.

On May 23, 2010, Israel sent Vanunu back to solitary confinement in a maximum prison facility and released him on August 8, 2010.

Vanunu emerged on fire and immediately became active on Facebook. Within a short time had nearly 1,000 Facebook Friends, but soon whittled them down to 46.

I was one of the many he “fired” and how we began conversing again is another long story that I will punt forward.

On May 1, 2012, Vanunu deactivated his Facebook Wall and Twitter Account after writing me:

“Today they sent first notice, they will renew the restrictions. Sent to my Lawyer. Now you are free, we can close the Cause. Either you do it or I will.

Vanunu’s appeal seeking to revoke his Israeli citizenship as a way to leave Israel is scheduled for July 2012 and can be read at his Youtube Channel which as of this writing remains online as does his website with his contact info:

On 24 April 2004, Uri Avnery wrote:

“Everybody understands that Vanunu has no more secrets. What can a technician know after 18 years in jail, during which technology has advanced with giant steps?

“But gradually it becomes clear what the security establishment is really afraid of. Vanunu is in a position to expose the close partnership with the United States in the development of Israel’s nuclear armaments.

“This worries Washington so much, that the man responsible in the State Department for ‘arms control’, Under-Secretary John Bolton, has come to Israel in person for the occasion. Vanunu, it appears, can cause severe damage to the mighty super-power.

“The Americans, it seems, are very worried. The Israeli security services have to dance to their tune. The world must be prevented by all available means from hearing, from the lips of a credible witness, that the Americans are full partners in Israel’s nuclear arms program, while pretending to be the world’s sheriff for the prevention of nuclear proliferation.” [2]

Also in 2004, Haaretz reporter, Yossi Melman wrote:

“This is the secret that hasn’t yet been told in the affair: the story of the security fiasco that made it possible for Vanunu to do what he did, and the story of the subsequent attempts at cover-up, whitewashing and protection of senior figures in the defense establishment, who were bent on divesting themselves of responsibility for the failure. The 18-year prison term to which Vanunu was sentenced is almost exactly the same period as that in which Yehiel Horev has served as chief of internal security in the defense establishment [who has been] involved in the affair as deputy chief of security at the Defense Ministry, and also after Vanunu’s abduction and arrest, as a member of an investigative commission.

“Shortly after taking office as chief of security at the Defense Ministry, Horev began to take punitive measures to hobble Vanunu. He is responsible for the harsh conditions in which Vanunu was held, which included years in solitary confinement, and the sharp limitations on the number of visitors he could have…[and has fought] a rearguard battle to prevent Vanunu from leaving Israel and to place him under supervision and restrictions that will be tantamount to house arrest. Horev has always been considered the strictest of all the security chiefs in Israel, especially in regard to the protection of institutions such as the Dimona facility and the Biological Institute. He is apprehensive that if Vanunu goes abroad, he will continue to be a nuisance by stimulating the public debate over Israel’s nuclear policy and the nuclear weapons he says Israel possesses…all the hyperactivity being displayed by Horev and those who support his approach is intended only to divert attention from what has not yet been revealed: the security blunders and their cover-ups.” [Ibid]

I was NOT a reporter in 2005, but I became one after Vanunu told me:

“President Kennedy tried to stop Israel from building atomic weapons. Kennedy insisted on an open internal inspection.

“When Johnson became president, he made an agreement with Israel that two senators would come every year to inspect. Before the senators would visit, the Israelis would build a wall to block the underground elevators and stairways. From 1963 to ’69, the senators came, but they never knew about the wall that hid the rest of the Dimona from them.

“Nixon stopped the inspections and agreed to ignore the situation. As a result, Israel increased production. In 1986, there were over two hundred bombs. Today, they may have enough plutonium for ten bombs a year.” [Ibid]

In 2005, Vanunu also shared his dream of, “Leaving Israel. Having a job. A home. A family.”

Vanunu turns 58 this October 13th.

The last time I saw him in 2009, he told me that he endures his open-air captivity by escaping into opera.

“Opera inspires me, it gives me strength. When I was twenty-two I stopped listening to pop; The Beatles, Cat Stevens, Bob Dylan. I like challenges and began listening to opera. It builds skyscrapers in my mind. Opera is nutrition for the brain. Opera enlarges and develops the brain. Opera speaks to my brain…

“Every morning I am in my room until eleven listening to opera. I find ways to enjoy myself as my way of resistance. I transform anger into positive energy.”

Vanunu is a fan of Wagner, but this little sister recommends Beethoven’s only opera in which he expressed his dream for humanity-a liberation into true sister-brotherhood.

Beethoven: Fidelio (1970, Opera-Film)

I also plead with all who have read this far to do something now: Petition your political reps to help FREE Vanunu and request your Media report on his next scheduled appeal to be heard in July seeking to revoke his citizenship as a way to leave Israel:

Vanunu Mordechai asking ,CANCEL,Revoking my Citizenship-MAY 5-2011.


Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on TO: Mossad/Shabbak RE: Your Vendetta against Israeli Nuclear Whistle Blower, Vanunu Mordechai

Shoah’s pages