Archive | June 23rd, 2012

On the Egyptian Revolution and the American Strategy


by Hassan Nasrallah

7 February 2011

. . . Today we declare our solidarity.  One of the forms of our solidarity is to defend this revolution, this intifada, this great historic popular movement.  One of the responsibilities of defending this revolution is to reveal its true image as all data indicate. . . .  We contact those on the ground, in the squares, in the streets, the young and the old.  We talk to them and listen to what they have to say: their slogans, songs, chants, words and statements.  We listen to what is said in satellite media and other means of communication.  That’s because they, the Egyptians themselves, are the ones who can show us the truth, the form and content, the nature, aims, and hopes of their revolution, their intifada. . . .

First: We are witnessing a real popular revolution, a real Egyptian national revolution.  Muslims and Christians are participating in this revolution, as are Islamic factions, secular parties, nationalist parties, and intellectuals.  In fact all sectors of the popular classes are taking part in this revolution: the young, the old, women, men, clerics, artists, intellectuals, workers, and farmers.  However, the most important of all is the presence of the youth.  So from this perspective we are witnessing a complete revolution.

Second: This is a revolution of the will of the people, the determination of the people, the commitment of the people.  People are demonstrating, they are offering themselves as martyrs, they are making sacrifices, they are risking injury.  They are sleeping under the skies in this cold rainy weather.  They are themselves determining what they want, what they want to do, where they want to go, what regime they will accept and what type of solution to adopt.  They are the decision makers in everything they say, do, and look forward to.  So all accusations of being part of a foreign agenda — whoever this alleged foreign party is, whether it is a friend or foe of Egypt — are accusations which will fail to stick, have failed to stick, given the will of the Egyptian people and its brave youth.  This is a point I will come back to soon.

Third: the essence and content of this revolution, this intifada.  Is this a revolution of bread because people are hungry?  Or is it a revolution to achieve social justice and social equality?  Or is it a revolution to attain freedom and democracy?  Or is it a revolution for political reasons?  Does it have something to do with the regime’s foreign policies and Egypt’s stance in the region, the ummah, and the world?  We have heard many explanations and analyses.  Everyone is trying to take things in a certain direction.

The friends of Israel and America — intellectuals, political leaders, and media outlets close to America and Israel — want to convince the world that what is taking place in Egypt is just a revolution of bread, a revolution of the hungry.  The truth, however, is told to the whole world by the protesters in Liberation Square, the protesters in Egypt.  It is expressed by their slogans, by their blood, by their smiles, by their anger, by their stances. . . .  This means that we are witnessing acomplete revolution in its essence, in its fundamental parts.  It is a revolution of the poor.  It is a revolution of freedom-loving people, of freedom seekers.  It is a revolution of those who refuse to be humiliated and insulted because this nation has been under subjection having surrendered its will to America and Israel.  It is a political, social, and human revolution.  It is a revolution against everything — corruption, oppression, hunger, the squandering of the capabilities of this country, and the regime’s policy on the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Fourth: It is a duty to stand in solidarity with Egypt’s popular revolution.  It is a noble revolution, unbesmirched by all the accusations they try to stick to it.  One of the worst accusations, made by certain figures in our Arab world, which we have heard from the very beginning — we also heard this during the Tunisian revolution — is that this revolution is fabricated by the US administration — the US intelligence services, the Pentagon, and the US State Department; that the Americans are the ones behind the popular movement, pushing people to protest and coordinating with the youths of the movement; that the Americans are the ones leading and controlling this revolution.

On this day of solidarity, we must say that this accusation does great injustice.  Any Arab or Muslim or free human being anywhere in this world cannot think that about the Tunisian youth or Egyptian youth; anyone who does is doing great injustice.  It’s an unjust way to speak, an insult to the minds and wills of these youths and people — to their awareness, to their culture, and to their understanding.

Brothers and sisters!  Who among us can believe that America is seeking to topple a regime which provides it with all the services it wants and works faithfully and truthfully to protect its interests and its project in the region?  Can anyone believe that the Americans are behind this protest?  It is absolutely illogical and irrational. . . .

Yes, the Americans are trying to ride the wave.  They are trying to take advantage of this revolution.  They are trying to curb and absorb this revolution.  They are trying to beautify their ugly image in our Arab and Islamic world, and they are trying to present themselves as defenders of people, of their rights, wills, and freedoms, after decades of absolute support for the worst dictatorships witnessed in our region.  This is the most serious danger, the greatest danger which our peoples in revolt, out resistance movements, must be aware of and be vigilant against.

Brothers and sisters! . . .  The US administration has undertaken many studies and opinion polls in our region, especially in the Arab and Islamic world.  It wanted to know: What is the direction of opinions?  What do people think?  What do they accept?  What do they reject?  What do they look forward to?  The results were very clear. . . .  They are published in newspapers and magazines — especially those specializing in strategic affairs — and forums and conferences. . . .  All the studies and opinion polls reached the following conclusions:

The overwhelming majority of our Arab and Islamic peoples are against the US policies.  They reject them.  This does not mean we are enemies of the American people.  Perhaps in time we will find out that the majority of the American people are poor people who don’t know what is going on in the world and that their interests and priorities are totally different.

The overwhelming majority of our Arab and Islamic peoples reject the US policies for obvious reasons: the absolute American support for Israel and its wars from the establishment of the Zionist entity to the Gaza War in 2008 (we also saw it in the war on Lebanon in 2006); the absolute American support for the corrupt dictatorships that are US allies in the region; America’s own wars and crimes in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and elsewhere in our Arab and Islamic world; the disclosure of US lies and double standards in everything, when it comes to human rights, freedoms, and democracy.

These American studies and opinion polls also revealed that there are major changes in store in the region.  That is what Hillary Clinton hinted at just a few weeks ago.  The Americans have become sure that the regimes that are allied with the US and collaborating with Israel are against the will of the people when it comes to their stance on America and Israel and will not be able to withstand popular pressure for long.  The will of the people has had enough of this status quo.  The polls and studies showed, too, that these regimes, their leaders, and their figureheads do not enjoy any popularity, respect, esteem among their peoples; at the same time, the polls showed that other figures, other leaders, occupy first, second, and third places because of their stances on the Palestinian cause and the American project.  So the US administration expressed its anxiety.

That does not mean that the US administration has plotted or is working to overthrow the regime which serves it.  However, it has beenpreparing itself for what could happen: if the people revolted and tried to express its rejection of the regime in any country, the US administration would then stand in the middle; having learned from its experience in confronting the revolution in Iran as well as from all its previous experiences, it would not do to support oppression and bloody confrontation because, as it knows, the result of bloody confrontation with the people would be catastrophic for America, and for its allies, its agents, its old and new servants as well.  That is why it is standing in the middle now.  It is trying to present itself in a different way — as defender of people and their choices — and trying to guarantee the kind of transition of power, authority, and leadership that would preserve all its relations and alliance, the American project and interests. . . .

What concerns the US regime in the region is its own interests and Israel’s interests.  It doesn’t really matter who is in power.  America can abandon anyone who is in power at any moment.  Precisely who is in power is unimportant — whether or not he is Islamic doesn’t matter to America.  No one there cares about that.  The Americans don’t veto anyone based on whether he is a Muslim, from an Islamic movement, a leftist, a rightist, a nationalist, a secularist, a religious cleric, a sheikh, a sayyed, a patriarch, or a bishop.  No, that doesn’t concern America.  America is not concerned about such an ideological self-positioning of a leader.  What is most important is this: Is this leader, is this regime, committed to America’s interests and Israel’s interests?  If the answer is yes, no problem, whatever the ideological posturing of the leader and regime may be. . . .

Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah is Secretary General of Hezbollah.  This speech was broadcast at the solidarity rally with Egypt held in Ghobeiry Square on 7 February 2011.  The text above is an excerpt from the speech.

Posted in LebanonComments Off on On the Egyptian Revolution and the American Strategy

Dawn of a Revolution – Death of a Hero


Dictator Hosni Mubarak with his Zioconservative paymaster George Bush
Egyptian dictator Zionist Hosni Mu-Barak with his Zioconservative paymaster President George W. Bush

After eighteen days of courageous protests, the Egyptian people seem to have succeeded in ousting the dictator and Zionist puppet Hosni Mubarak, though it is not yet clear whether sinister forces will attempt to resume some new form of dictatorship.

This is potentially not just the end of Mubarak, but the beginning of the end of Imperial control over Egypt which dates back in different forms to the British takeover in the late 1870s and early 1880s.

The Suez debacle in 1956 demonstrated that Britain had lost control and that the future hegemony would belong to the USA and Israel.

Now the determination of the Egyptian people has exposed the true weakness of these notoriously arrogant powers. Obama and Netanyahu now look as helpless as Eden was in 1956.

Of course there will be efforts by hidden forces to attempt to regain control of events. In this regard it is sad (and perhaps even suspicious) that February 10th saw the death of a great anti-Zionist Egyptian patriot, General Saad el-Shazly.

Gen. Shazly was 88 years old, so in normal circumstances one would not assume suspicious circumstances.

However the coincidence that he died just the day before a military coup, which had he been alive and in good health he would certainly have influenced in a strongly anti-Zionist direction, may give rise to suspicions.

Gen. Saad el-Shazly
Gen. Saad el-Shazly

In 1974 Gen. Shazly was appointed Egyptian Ambassador in London, but was immediately condemned in Parliament by Zionist MPs Stanley Clinton Davis and Michael Fidler, who called for his diplomatic accreditation to be refused because he had corresponded with British anti-Zionist leaders Colin Jordan and John Tyndall during the early 1960s, when Gen. Shazly was Egyptian defence attache in London.

The new Wilson government later in 1974 put pressure on the Egyptians, resulting in Gen. Shazly’s transfer in 1975 to be Ambassador to Portugal. In June 1978 he spoke out against President Sadat’s move towards dictatorship, and his 1986 book The Arab Military Option called for decisive united action against the Zionist occupiers.

During the 1990s he served a three year prison sentence in Egypt for his criticisms of the Mubarak regime.

It was fortunate that Gen. Shazly lived to see the beginning of the Egyptian Revolution that will consign that regime to the dustbin of history. It will be the best tribute to his memory for the Egyptian armed forces to rally behind the people in completing that Revolution and breaking the power of Zioconservatism and its stooges.

All supporters of truth and justice will join in sending their condolences to Gen. Shazly’s family and friends.

Colin JordanJohn Tyndall
Colin Jordan (left) and John Tyndall – Gen. Shazly was condemned in the UK Parliament for supporting these British anti-Zionists

Posted in EgyptComments Off on Dawn of a Revolution – Death of a Hero

UN Demands “Undermining of European Homogeneity”


The United Nations special representative for migration, Peter Sutherland, has called on the European Union to “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states but has remained complete silent on Zio-Nazi  racist regime expulsion of non-Jews and that state’s determination to remain homogenous.

Sutherland, a non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, is typical of those sort of goyim who are weak puppets of the international Zionist death-grip over world political affairs, which demands one standard from all non-Jews, and another from Jews.

According to a BBC report, Sutherland told the British House of Lords that “the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.”

In reality, as a report from the House of Lords itself showed, immigration has had little or no effect on the economic well-being of the UK, and in fact has cost the country money. The same applies to all other First World nations, America included.

Irish-born Sutherland went on to say that the UK government’s “immigration policy had no basis in international law.”

An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.

“It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”

The UN special representative on migration was also quizzed about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.

He told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.

“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”

The website of the UN’s Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants reports on Zio-Racist, which can be found here, contain no mention of the Zionist state’s ethnic cleansing of non-Jews and the expulsions of African refugees which are illegal under international law.

Posted in Europe, UKComments Off on UN Demands “Undermining of European Homogeneity”

Zio-Nazi Supremacists and Their Puppets Continue Illegal Cyberwar against Iran


The Zionist Supremacists and their puppets in the U.S. government have continued their illegal and vindictive covert cyberwar against Iran with a new computer virus called “Flame” which is designed to sabotage that nation’s computers.

According to an announcement by anti-virus company Symantec Corp, and reported in the Washington Post, a component of “Flame” allows operators to delete files from computers and that Israel and the U.S. government have co-operated in creating the virus.

The Flame computer virus is not only capable of espionage but it can also sabotage computer systems and likely was used to attack Iran in April, according to Symantec Corp.

Iran had previously blamed Flame for causing data loss on computers in the country’s main oil export terminal and Oil Ministry. But prior to Symantec’s discovery, cyber experts had only unearthed evidence that proved the mysterious virus was capable of espionage.

Symantec researcher Vikram Thakur said that the company has now identified a component of Flame that allows operators to delete files from computers.

”These guys have the capability to delete everything on the computer,” Thakur said. ”This is not something that is theoretical. It is absolutely there.”

Iran complained about the threat of cyber attacks again on Thursday, saying it had detected plans by the United States, Israel and Britain to launch a ”massive” strike after the breakdown of talks over Tehran’s nuclear activities.

Thakur’s comments came after, on Thursday, Iran’s intelligence minister accused the United States, Israel, and Britain of planning to launch a cyber attack against Iran following the latest round of nuclear talks in Moscow.

Speaking to the Iranian state run television network Press TV, Iranian Intelligence Minister Heidar Moslehi said: “Based on obtained information, the U.S. and the Zionist regime along with the MI6 planned an operation to launch a massive cyber attack against Iran’s facilities following the meeting between Iran and the P5+1 in Moscow.”

According to Moslehi, the alleged attempt to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities failed over Iranian measures, adding: “They still seek to carry out the plan, but we have taken necessary measures.”

The top Iranian official’s comments came after, earlier this week, Moscow hosted the latest round of P5+1 nuclear talks, which ended in the apparent breakdown of talks.

According to the Washington Post, the virus was developed in a joint effort involving the National Security Agency, the CIA and Israel’s military.

The emerging details about Flame provide new clues to what is thought to be the first sustained campaign of cyber-sabotage against an adversary of the United States.

Flame came to light last month after Iran detected a series of cyberattacks on its oil industry. The disruption was directed by Israel in a unilateral operation that apparently caught its American partners off guard, according to several U.S. and Western officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

There has been speculation that Washington had a role in developing Flame, but the collaboration on the virus between the United States and Israel has not been previously confirmed.

Commercial security researchers reported last week that Flame contained some of the same code as Stuxnet. Experts described the overlap as DNA-like evidence that the two sets of malware were parallel projects run by the same entity.

The virus is among the most sophisticated and subversive pieces of malware to be exposed to date. Experts said the program was designed to replicate across even highly secure networks, then control everyday computer functions to send secrets back to its creators. The code could activate computer microphones and cameras, log keyboard strokes, take screen shots, extract geolocation data from images, and send and receive commands and data through Bluetooth wireless technology.

Flame was designed to do all this while masquerading as a routine Microsoft software update; it evaded detection for several years by using a sophisticated program to crack an encryption algorithm.

“This is not something that most security researchers have the skills or resources to do,” said Tom Parker, chief technology officer for FusionX, a security firm that specializes in simulating state-sponsored cyberattacks. “You’d expect that of only the most advanced cryptomathematicians, such as those working at NSA.”

Flame was developed at least five years ago as part of a classified effort code-named Olympic Games, according to officials familiar with U.S. cyber-operations and experts who have scrutinized its code. The U.S.-Israeli collaboration was intended to slow Iran’s nuclear program, reduce the pressure for a conventional military attack and extend the timetable for diplomacy and sanctions.

The cyberattacks augmented conventional sabotage efforts by both countries, including inserting flawed centrifuge parts and other components into Iran’s nuclear supply chain.

The best-known cyberweapon let loose on Iran was Stuxnet, a name coined by researchers in the antivirus industry who discovered it two years ago.

It infected a specific type of industrial controller at Iran’s uranium-enrichment plant in Natanz, causing almost 1,000 centrifuges to spin out of control. The damage occurred gradually, over months, and Iranian officials initially thought it was the result of incompetence.

The scale of the espionage and sabotage effort “is proportionate to the problem that’s trying to be resolved,” the former intelligence official said, referring to the Iranian nuclear program. Although Stuxnet and Flame infections can be countered, “it doesn’t mean that other tools aren’t in play or performing effectively,” he said.

To develop these tools, the United States relies on two of its elite spy agencies. The NSA, known mainly for its electronic eavesdropping and code-breaking capabilities, has extensive expertise in developing malicious code that can be aimed at U.S. adversaries, including Iran. The CIA lacks the NSA’s sophistication in building malware but is deeply involved in the cyber-campaign.

Despite their collaboration on developing the malicious code, the United States and Israel have not always coordinated their attacks. Israel’s April assaults on Iran’s Oil Ministry and oil-export facilities caused only minor disruptions. The episode led Iran to investigate and ultimately discover Flame.

Some U.S. intelligence officials were dismayed that Israel’s unilateral incursion led to the discovery of the virus, prompting countermeasures.

The disruptions led Iran to ask a Russian security firm and a Hungarian cyber-lab for help, according to U.S. and international officials familiar with the incident.

Last week, researchers with Kaspersky Lab, the Russian security firm, reported their conclusion that Flame — a name they came up with — was created by the same group or groups that built Stuxnet.

“We are now 100 percent sure that the Stuxnet and Flame groups worked together,” said Roel Schouwenberg, a Boston-based senior researcher with Kaspersky Lab.

The firm also determined that the Flame malware predates Stuxnet. “It looks like the Flame platform was used as a kickstarter of sorts to get the Stuxnet project going,” Schouwenberg said.

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Zio-Nazi Supremacists and Their Puppets Continue Illegal Cyberwar against Iran

Zio-Nazi Still Center of Human Trafficking


Zio-Nazi regime is still a center of human trafficking and is “plagued with abuse” of that nature, the new U.S. State Department Trafficking in Persons Report 2012 has revealed.

According to the report, cases of women from the former Soviet Union, China, and South America are subjected to forced prostitution in IsraHell. It was only in response to international pressure and outrage that the Zio-Nazi regime passed an anti-trafficking law in 2006.

The report also stresses, however, that that the modern slavery problem is alive and well in the Jewish state. IsraHell is described as a destination country for people subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking.

The report states:

“Israel is a destination country for men and women subjected to forced labor and sex trafficking. Low-skilled workers from Thailand, China, Nepal, the Philippines, India, Sri Lanka, and, to a lesser extent, Romania, migrate voluntarily and legally to Israel for temporary contract labor in construction, agriculture, and caregiving industries.

Some subsequently face conditions of forced labor, including through such practices as the unlawful withholding of passports, restrictions on movement, inability to change or otherwise choose one’s employer, nonpayment of wages, threats, sexual assault, and physical intimidation.

Many labor recruitment agencies in source countries or brokers in Zionist require workers to pay exorbitant recruitment fees to secure jobs in Zionist – ranging from the equivalent of $4,000 to $20,000 – a practice that contributes to forced labor once migrants are working in IsraHell.

Based on many documented victim testimonies, an increasing number of migrants and asylum seekers – primarily from Eritrea, Sudan, and to a lesser extent Ethiopia – arriving in IsraHell are reportedly held for ransom and forced into sexual servitude or labor during their captivity in the Egypt’s Sinai.

In 2011, the U.S. State Department ranked IsraHell alongside Third World nations for human trafficking.

The report for that year said that “IsraHell is destination-country for men, women subjected to forced labor, sex trafficking.”

This put the Zionist regime in the same category as Pakistan and Rwanda.

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Zio-Nazi Still Center of Human Trafficking

Zionist Have Been Wronged, So Pollard Must Be Released’


The Deputy Speaker of the Zio-Nazi KKKnesset and Chairman of the World Likud, Zio-Nazi Danny Danon, has demanded that America “right its wrongs to Israel” by unilaterally releasing convicted spy zionist Jonathon Pollard.

In an astonishing display of “chutzpah”, or zionist cheek, Danon wrote in an opinion piece published by the zionist Ynet news service that Obama is obligated to release Pollard because of all the “insults” which the American president has given to IsraHell.

Pollard, a Zionist spy arrested in 1985 after it was found that he had passed over thousands of highly classified U.S. secrets to IsraHell.

Apart from all the agents he betrayed—and it is still  not exactly known how many deaths in the field his treason caused—Zionist Pollard gave Zio-Nazi regime vast amounts of data dealing with specific American intelligence systems and how they worked.

For example, he betrayed details of an exotic capability that American satellites have of taking off-axis photographs from high in space.

It is also now known that the Zio-Nazi regime repackaged much of Pollard’s material and provided it to the Soviet Union in exchange for continued Soviet permission for Jews to emigrate to IsraHell.

A significant percentage of Pollard’s documents, including some that described the techniques the American Navy used to track Soviet submarines around the world, was of practical importance only to the Soviet Union.

Zio-Nazi Danon, however, has in typical Jewish Supremacist fashion, attempted to use the “unrighteous Gentiles” canard as a reason why Pollard should now be released.

His article’s title, “Debt to the Jewish People,” sums up this attitude.

“It is now clear that in passing information to an American ally about dangerous nations that threatened Israel’s security, Pollard thought he was acting in the best interest of both the United States and Israel,” Danon wrote.

However, the publicly available records of the case show this to be a lie and that Pollard was motivated solely by Zio-Nazi interests.

According to the online Crime Library, “Pollard was soon spying on a regular basis for Israel. He leaked thousands of pages of highly sensitive documents to the Israelis. He was a most valuable and efficient spy for, as Carl Tashian wrote, “no one has stolen so much classified information so quickly.” At one of their meetings, Sella raised the issue of payment. Jay replied that he had no interest in it. He was motivated solely by his love for Israel. However, Avi insisted that Israel wanted to compensate the agent who was so productive for them.”

Danon went on to list the “sins” of Obama which, in his opinion, “justify” Pollard’s release:

“As is well documented by this point, President Obama has not missed an opportunity to insult the State of Israel.

“Earlier in his presidency he visited Cairo in June 2009 where he gave his ill-advised speech which, now in hindsight, was almost completely divorced from reality as he spoke about freedom and liberalism finally taking root in the Middle East.

“At that time, President Obama insulted the US’ so-called ally Israel by not bothering to make the short trip from visiting Mubarak’s dictatorship in Egypt to paying respects to the only true democracy in the Middle East.

“To add insult to injury, President Obama forced a so-called “construction freeze” upon Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and attempted to cut off all natural growth in the communities of Judea and Samaria.

“Not only was this a biased policy that forbade Jews from building in their ancestral homeland while allowing Palestinians to continue to grow and expand their communities without any restrictions, the way it was pushed upon the Israeli government was disrespectful to the democratic will of the Israeli people.

“More than any past president, President Obama needs to make amends to the people of Israel by releasing Jonathan Pollard.”

Of course, Israel is anything but democratic, and Obama has been one of the most slavishly pro-Israeli presidents yet.

But in the messianic and paranoid world of Jewish Supremacism, the goyim can never be subservient enough.

Posted in USA, ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Zionist Have Been Wronged, So Pollard Must Be Released’

Biodiversity and the Environment: Silent Spring For Us?

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Global Research,

With her 1962 book, Silent Spring, Rachel Carson got DDT and other synthetic pesticides banned and saved bird life. Today it is humans who are directly threatened by  technologies designed to extract the maximum profit at the lowest private cost and the maximum social cost from natural resources.

Once abundant clean water has become a scarce resource. Yet, in the US ground water and surface water are being polluted and made unusable by mountain top removal mining, fracking and other such “new technologies.”  Ranchers in eastern Montana, for example, are being forced out of ranching by polluted water.

Offshore oil drilling and chemical farming run-off have destroyed fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico. In other parts of the world, explosives used to maximize short-run fish catches have destroyed coral reefs that sustained fish life.   Deforestation for short-run agricultural production results in replacing bio-diverse rain forests with barren land. The “now generation” is leaving a resource scarce planet to future generations.

Nuclear power plants are thoughtlessly built in earthquake and tsunami zones. Spent fuel rods are stored within the plants, a practice that adds their destructive potential to a catastrophic accident or act of nature.

The newest threat comes from genetically modified seeds that produce crops resistant to herbicides.  The active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide is glyphosate, a toxic element that now contaminates groundwater in Spain and according to the US Geological Survey is now “commonly found in rain and streams in the Mississippi River Basin.”

In 2011 Don Huber, a plant pathologist and soil microbiologist, wrote to the US Secretary of Agriculture about the unexpected consequences of GMOs and the accompanying herbicides. He cited adverse effects on critical micronutrients, soil fertility, and the nutritional value of foods.  He cited the impairment of metabolic pathways that prevents plants from accumulating and storing minerals, such as iron, manganese, and zinc, minerals important for liver function and immune response in animals and people. He cited toxic effects on the microorganisms in the soil that have disrupted nature’s balance and resulted in large increases in plant diseases. He cited livestock deaths from botulism, premature animal aging, and an increase in animal and human infertility.

In an interview, Huber said that the power of agri-business has made it almost impossible to do research on GMOs and that regulatory agencies with the responsibility of protecting the public are dependent on the industry’s own self-serving studies and have no independent objective science on which to base a regulatory decision.

In short, in order to secure bumper crops for several years, we are destroying the fertility of soil, animal and human life.

Mankind has been destroying the world for a long time. In his fascinating book, 1493Charles C. Mann describes the adverse effects on the environment, people, and civilizations of the globalism unleashed by Christopher Columbus. These include the international transfer of human and plant diseases, deforestation, destructions of peoples and empires, and the impact on distant China of Spanish new world silver.

Mann provides a history lesson in unintended and unexpected consequences resulting from the actions of elites and of those that elites dominated. The Chinese government fixed taxation in terms of the quantity of silver, but the importation of Spanish silver inflated prices (decreased the value of a given quantity of silver) and left the government without sufficient revenues. 

A successor government or dynasty evicted Chinese from the coast in order to deprive pirates of resources. The displaced millions of people deforested mountainsides in order to sustain themselves with terrace agriculture. The result of deforestation was floods that not only washed away the terraces but also the crops in the fertile valleys below. Consequently, floods became one of China’s greatest challenges to its food supply.

The first slaves were conquered new world natives, but the “Indians” had no immunity to European diseases. The second wave of slaves were European whites, but the Europeans had no immunity to malaria and yellow fever. By default slavery fell to blacks, many of whom had immunity to malaria and yellow fever. Thus, a black workforce could survive the infected environments and newly created wetlands in which to raise sugarcane, wetlands that were ideal homes for malaria and yellow fever bearing mosquitoes.  Mann, of course, is merely reporting, not justifying black or any slavery.

Mann points out that the lowly mosquito had a large impact on American history. The Mason-Dixon Line roughly splits the East Coast into two zones, the South in which disease carrying mosquitoes were an endemic threat, and the north in which malaria was not a threat. In the South, a person who survived childhood and grew into an adult had acquired immunity.  Northerners had no such protection.

This had enormous consequences when Northern armies invaded the South. Mann reports that “disease killed twice as many Union troops as Confederate bullets or shells.”  Between the summers of 1863 and 1864, the official annual infection rate for what was called “intermittent fevers” was 233 percent.  The average northern soldier
was felled more than twice. In one year 361,968 troops were infected.  Most of the deaths from malaria were indirect.  The disease so badly weakened the troops that they died from dysentery, measles or strep infection. 

The mosquito was the South’s most powerful ally and so prolonged the war, despite the vast numerical superiority of the Union force, that Lincoln was forced to take action that he opposed and declare emancipation of slaves. Thus, Mann writes, it is not farfetched to conclude that blacks were freed by the very malaria mosquito that had caused blacks to be the preferred workforce.  

Mann shows that long before the birth of capitalism, greed drove men to barbarous treatment of their fellows. He also shows that policies, whether driven by greed or by well-intended socio-political design, inevitably had unexpected consequences. His multi-faceted history well illustrates the old adage, “the well laid plans of mice and men often go awry.”

The old world’s colonization of the new world devastated new world peoples, but the new world bit back with the spread of the potato blight to Europe and Spanish and European inflation.  

Environmental destruction resulted mainly from deforestation and soils washed away by consequent floods. Prior to modern technology and toxic chemicals, the planet survived mankind.

Today the prospects for the planet are different. The human population is vast compared to earlier times, putting far more pressure on resources, and the disastrous consequences of new technologies are unknown at the time that they are employed, when the focus is on the expected benefits. Moreover, these costs are external to the business, corporation, or economic unit. The costs are inflicted on the environment and on other humans and other animal life. The costs are not included when the business calculates its profit and return on its investment.  The external costs of fracking, mountain top removal mining, chemical farming, and GMOs could exceed the value of the marketable products. 

Businesses have no incentive to take these costs into account, because to do so reduces their profits and could indicate that the full cost of production exceeds the value of the output. Governments have proven to be largely ineffective in controlling external costs, because of the ability of private interests to influence the decisions of government. Even if one country were to confront these costs, other countries would take advantage of the situation. Companies that externalize some of their costs can undersell companies that internalize all of the costs of their production.  Thus, the planet can be destroyed by the short-term profit and convenience interests of one generation.

The main lesson that emerges from Mann’s highly readable book is that people today have no better grasp of the consequences of their actions than superstitious and unscientific people centuries ago.  Modern technological man is just as easily bamboozled by propaganda as ancient man was by superstition and ignorance.  

If you doubt that the peoples of Western civilization live in an artificial reality created by propaganda, watch the documentary on psyops at!  The documentary does a good job despite wandering off into a couple of side issues on which it takes one-sided positions.  It is a bit heavy on blaming the rich, and overlooks that Stalin, for example, had plenty of propaganda and wasn’t looking to make himself a billionaire.  Not all the rich are against the people. Billionaires Roger Milliken and Sir James Goldsmith fought against jobs offshoring and globalism, which increases the powerlessness of the people vis-a-vis the elites. Both spoke for the people to no avail.

The documentary also blames the Constitution for limiting the participation of the mass of the people in governing themselves without acknowledging that the Constitution restricted the power of government and guaranteed civil liberty by making law a shield of the people instead of a weapon in the hands of the government. It is not the Constitution’s fault, or the fault of Founding Father James Madison, that the American people succumbed to propaganda by Bush and Obama and gave up their civil liberty in order to be “safe” from “Muslim terrorists.”

The documentary shows that propaganda is a form of mind control, and controlled minds are indeed the American predicament. 

In 1962 Rachel Carson caught Monsanto off guard and thus gained an audience. Today she would not get the same attention. Ready and waiting psyops would go into operation to discredit her.  I just read an article by an economist who wrote that economists have decided that environmentalism is a religion, in other words, an unscientific belief system that preaches “religious values.”  This demonstrates what little importance economists attribute to external costs and the ability of externalized costs to destroy the productive power of the planet.  Thus, the question, “silent spring for us?” is not merely rhetorical.  It is real.

Posted in USAComments Off on Biodiversity and the Environment: Silent Spring For Us?

Press TV – West Point Caught Teaching Genocide Classes…for 12 Years


“Duty, Honor, Country” or “Murder, Theft and Silence,”  Can We Afford More BetrayaL

…by  Gordon Duff  and Press TV


It has been discovered that the US military academies, West Point in particular, having been teaching classes for as long as 12 years that openly advocate genocide, population reduction through use of nuclear, biological and chemical war along with open racism and apartheid views.



These schools, churning out the actual war criminals, always unindicted as the US ducks and dives whenever held to account for atrocities that have killed up to 2 million in Central Asia, are unsupervised, operating outside their own honor codes and, in particular, no one has ever come forward.

The Code of Honor – Where Did it Go? – Who Took it?

The “code of silence” includes covering up war crimes, and has created a very real version of the old Stalin Soviet Union’s “butcher academies” here at home, showing that America’s “best and brightest” are little but “bottom feeders” and “dim bulbs,” willing to do anything for a buck.

Why pay $100,000 a year and millions for training when we can hire professional killers from Ethiopia, Peru, Chile or Indonesia?

Worse still, we are turning our sons and daughters over to this gang of half baked misfits.

If we wonder why civilians are murdered, why we torture and kill, the answer is simple, it is taught as official US Army policy, at taxpayer expense, policies that have made the war in Afghanistan go on for a decade, our biggest “loss” since Vietnam, policies that make Obama’s “drone problem” seem like a “walk in the park.”

America spends trillions of dollars on its military.  It is no wonder our major weapons systems, the Patriot 3 missile system, the F 35 and F 22 are totally broken, the truth covered up by academy grads.

No wonder we lose wars, one after the other.  We even wonder if we won World War II?  Modern historians now frame that conflict as one between financial systems, not a political struggle, with the US favoring unstable currencies, a usury based banking system and the “fascist enemy” advocating all the things that the world is now saying it needed to do long ago.

But then there is the holocaust, which we are told of daily by the exact same people who delivered the usury based monetary system.  No wonder questioning the holocaust is a crime in so many countries controlled by powerful banks, countries, every single one of which is bankrupt with mass suicides in many.

The truth? We can’t handle the truth. 

‘Everyone at West Point must be investigated  as war criminals’


From Press TV


Gordon Duff is a senior editor at Veterans  Today and in a phone interview with Press TV’s U.S. Desk on Thursday, he  criticized the West Point Military Academy for training officers “to commit  genocide.”


Has the Ring Been Tarnished

Duff said, “One of the key issues, about the  secret training that our officers have been receiving is that none of us knew  that they were being trained for genocide. That West  Point had openly advocated that American officers should use nuclear  weapons against civilians. That civilians be murdered.”


Duff continued that he did not believe that  officers could be retrained adding that there were a few good people within the  officer corps but there were also many officers who chose to become military  officers because they were unqualified for any kind of civilian life.

“The theme of West  Point is duty, honor, country. There is an oath at West Point. These courses are a violation of that oath.  Anyone who took those courses violated the oath and I believe needs to be  removed from military service … We need to cleanse these military academies,”  Duff added.

Duff continued,

“In particular, West Point is the problem. West Point’s inability to stand  with the standards they had set … the inability of anyone, over ten years,  ever to have come public with some of the horrific things that have gone on  there.

This is unacceptable for the United  States, it is unacceptable for the world, and  everyone involved is in actuality guilty of war crimes.”

“I think we need to take the entire faculty of West Point-everyone who has been in West Point- and have them listed as war criminals at The Hague.

We have to indict all of them; they all have to be investigated as to whether they have been at war, and they have committed genocide since they  have been trained to commit genocide.”

How Many Will Just Look the Other Way When Their Turn Comes to be True to the Code?

Posted in USAComments Off on Press TV – West Point Caught Teaching Genocide Classes…for 12 Years

Breaking – Putin in Tel Aviv, Sharpening the Knife (updated)


VT Hard Proof – Syrian President Bashir Assad is an Israeli Agent

Ground Zero for these two: America

by  Gordon Duff, Senior Editor


There are two basically communist countries in the Middle East, Israel, mixed Communist, Socialist and military dictatorship and Syria, a military dictatorship that was Baathist, a mixture of Communism, Socialism and “Arab identity exploitation.”

Putin loves them both equally but is forced to visit Israel so as not to appear to be, well, deeply involved in a plot against the United States involving Israel, the Soviet Union and Syria.  Some call the Soviet Union “Russia.”  They believe the US won the cold war.

No wonder Putin chooses his best friend, “Bibi” for his first overseas visit.  They have a lot to talk about.  Their problem however is that we now know the whole dirty story.

Putin hates America more than anyone in the world, any terrorist, were such things to really exist. There might be some, but there is little or no existing proof that international terrorist organizations exist except for those simulated by governments for reasons of need to respond with violence against innocent civilians.

Munich – Who really did what to whom, and why? And has this kind of thing been done before?

Ain’t never been no Al Qaeda, the others, even the famed PLO little but an Israeli front organization.  Would Israel kill it’s own Olympic athletes to gain sympathy? In a New York minute they would, and have done little else for some time.

Below we are going to expose the 2003 Israeli attack on Syria’s imaginary nuclear program and categorically prove it could never have happened.  Then we can explain why the two nations worked together to deceive the world that they were enemies when, in fact, they were fast friends.

Next week, new Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin will be making his first overseas trip.  It isn’t to Germany or China or America.  He is visiting the man he says is his closest ally, and for that he travels to Tel Aviv.

While the world is nearing war over Syria, he is visiting Benjamin Netanyahu.

What has also been mysterious is the pattern of communications between Israeli intelligence and the wife of Assad, the current president of Syria. Here, we have a verrrryyyy interesting story.

Daddy Hafez Assad – Mass murderer, but only one of many

Bashir Assad’s father took over Syria and established it as a military dictatorship in 1971.

His primary enemy was the Muslim Brotherhood, the same political party that won the recent elections in Egypt but is being prevented from taking power by highly illegal interference by a military long under the control of Mubarak and his friends in Israel.

At one time, Syria and Egypt were one Communist nation, called The United Arab Republic.  After 1961, with multiple government overthrows, this arrangement was dissolved.

The elder Assad, Hafez, exterminated the Muslim Brotherhood, finishing with the massacre of 30,000 civilians at the massacre of Hama in 1982.  The video below is in Arabic from 1982, 30 years ago.

The scenes are almost identical to those seen today yet some of the world acts as though this wasn’t all predicted so long ago:


From that point forward, extremely tight controls were maintained over the population where one in five people were government informants.  This continues to this day.

In 1994, 33 year old Basil al Assad, eldest son of President Hafez al Assad “died” in a minor traffic accident almost identical to the one that killed Lady Diana 3 years later.  This was a one car accident where an armoured limousine struck a barrier leaving the driver unhurt but killing Assad, the choice to take over the presidency.

Syria denied these killings, estimated at 38,000 and protested by the population every year since.  Maybe they can go back in history and blame NATO.  This is what the current  revolution started as, if anyone listened, a protest of the 1982 massacre was met with the 2012 massacre.

Did the Arab Spring really start in 1982

Syrians have had the Assad name hanging over them since the 70′s. They look on the family as Awat extremists, a brutal dictatorship. More have died in Syria than any place but Iraq. (American killing.)

Both nations, at one time Baathist, are among the most advanced in the Middle East, people capable, if allowed, of electing free governments without interference, said to be NATO but increasingly looking like good friends in Moscow and Tel Aviv.

We have so many whose beliefs are all based on the propaganda that Israel is an American ally and free, ask the 60,000 Israeli’s of African origin who are being expelled by gunpoint after years of working for $2 per day, ask them about freedom.

More of why the Assad name is despised by all in Syria, undisputed photos of Assad butchery from 1982, almost identical to those we see today:


Calling this a new revolution is insane?  This has been going on for 30 years with over 100,000 dead.


Bassel Assad – A mysterious and convenient death for whom?

Assad’s oldest son Bassel was his father’s choice to succeed him, a strong military leader who would have been legally old enough to assume the presidency in 2000 when his father died. Instead, Bashir al Assad, an opthamologist from London who was finishing his residency became president.

Bashir’s personal accomplishments are primarily having been propelled through medical school in Damascus, and when it became necessary, was given the rank of Colonel in the Army with less training than Uganda gives a private security guard.

A few odd things happened.  Bashir became president in 2000 running unopposed and getting 97.5% of the vote.

He also married a beautiful young lady from London that he met while doing medical training there. Some believe her to be an Israeli agent and Bashir’s handler. We think that is outrageous and irresponsible.

Her job, prior to marrying Bashir was working as an investment banker for J.P. Morgan/Rothschild, the largest Jewish controlled financial institution in the world.

Between 2000 and 2008, there was considerable bluster and even a reported bombing strike on Syria by Israel. However, we have pieced together (our staff, sources and readers) some new confirmed information on the Syrian nuclear plant that Israel claims to have bombed in 2007.

At the time of the bombing, Syria was undergoing political turmoil much as it is now, with the demand that Bashir resign and leave the country. The only thing that saved him was the Israeli attack on a “reactor” that absolutely no one believes ever existed.

Open Intel in the Guardian Observer -Thank You.

Then it happened. A newspaper in Qatar, interviewing Bashir, confirmed he had been in negotiations with Israel with Turkey as an intermediary, for a number of years.

This was 2008 and was confirmed by Israel, meaning they had been negotiating long before that.

The UK Guardian confirms but private sources place the date at 2003 rather than 2007.  It was highly profitable both nations to fein conflict.

What was most important was that Iran not be told of the talks nor the part Turkey had taken in aiding Israeli plans to attack Iran.

Turkey had allowed Israel to use their air space for training because their terrain closely resembled areas of Iran that Israel planned to attack.  However, Turkey was unaware that planes involved in this effort were being relocated to forward staging areas in the Republic of Georgia, making Turkey, technically, fully complicit in this planned illegal attack.

Helping coordinate the attack are intelligence units forward stationed in Azerbaijan, under the guise of technicians, trainers and advisors under the broad armaments agreements with that small nation.

Supply operations, moving necessary ordnance, much of it supplied by the United States under ammunition storage agreements, is being moved through the Black Sea to the Georgian Port of Poti, a major site for exporting coal and manganese ore.

Also, when looking at the Israeli bombing, dubbed Operation Orchard, it fails to take into account that, in 1991, Syria purchased an S300 air defense system from Russia, which was manned by their personnel and was the most modern version available when online some time before 1996.

It could have shot down the Israeli planes on the runway, much less have been defeated by any technology Israel had.  No technology America has currently, stealth or otherwise, can operate in that  environment.

In fact, the S300 system from 1996 is superior in performance to the current Patriot 3, our top level air defense system.  Let’s go further, this is what Wikipedia says about the system operational in 2003 in Syria and why Russian technicians were used:

S-300PMU-1/2 (SA-20)


S-300PMU-2 64N6E2 acquisition radar (part of 83M6E2 command post)

The S-300PMU-1 (Russian С-300ПМУ-1,US DoD designation SA-20A, NATO reporting name SA-20 Gargoyle) was also introduced in 1992 with the new and larger 48N6 missiles for the first time in a land-based system and introduced all the same performance improvements from the S300FM version including the increased speed, range, TVM guidance and ABM capability.[11] The warhead is slightly smaller than the naval version at 143 kg (315 lb). This version also saw the introduction of the new and more capable 30N6E TOMB STONE radar.

The S-300PMU-1 was introduced in 1999 and for the first time introduces several different kinds of missiles in a single system. In addition to the 5V55R, 48N6E and 48N6E2 missiles the S-300PMU-1 can utilise two new missiles, the 9M96E1 and 9M96E2. Both are significantly smaller than the previous missiles at 330 and 420 kg (728 and 926 lb respectively) and carry smaller 24 kg (53 lb) warhead.

The 9M96E1 has an engagement range of 1–40 km (1–25 mi) and the 9M96E2 of 1–120 km (1–75 mi). They are still carried 4 per TEL. Rather than just relying on aerodynamic fins for manoeuvring, they use a gas-dynamic system which allows them to have an excellentprobability of kill (Pk) despite the much smaller warhead. The Pk is estimated at 0.7 against a tactical ballistic missile for either missile.

The S-300PMU-1 typically uses the 83M6E command and control system, although it is also compatible with the older Baikal-1E and Senezh-M1E CCS command and control systems. The 83M6E system incorporates the 64N6E (BIG BIRD) surveillance/detection radar. The fire control/illumination and guidance radar used is the 30N6E(1), optionally matched with a 76N6 low altitude detection radar and a 96L6E all altitude detection radar. The 83M6E command and control system can control up to 12 TELs, both the self propelled 5P85SE vehicle and the 5P85TE towed launchers. Generally support vehicles are also included, such as the 40V6M tow vehicle, intended for lifting of the antenna post]


S-300PMU-2 vehicles. From left to right: 64N6E2 detection radar, 54K6E2 command post and 5P85 TEL.

The S-300PMU-2 Favorite (Russian С-300ПМУ-2 Фаворит –Favourite, DoD designation SA-20B), introduced in 1997, is an upgrade to the S-300PMU-1 with range extended once again to 195 km (121 mi) with the introduction of the 48N6E2 missile. This system is apparently capable against not just short range ballistic missiles, but now also medium range tactical ballistic missiles.

It uses the 83M6E2 command and control system, consisting of the 54K6E2 command post vehicle and the 64N6E2 surveillance/detection radar. It employs the 30N6E2 fire control/illumination and guidance radar. Like the S-300PMU-1, 12 TELs can be controlled, with any mix of 5P85SE2 self propelled and 5P85TE2 trailer launchers.

Optionally it can make use of the 96L6E all altitude detection radar and 76N6 low altitude detection radar, just like the S-300PMU-1.[12]

It gets worse.  Israel says it used planes.  This system shoots down ICBMs and cruise type missiles.  To it, planes are a joke.

America’s top F22 pilots, were that platform safe enough to fly, which it isn’t, a stealth aircraft decades beyond what Israel was flying would not have survived Syria’s air defenses.

The entire attack was phony, a set up, so pitiful and obvious that even the controlled press must have been embarrassed at having to pass on such swill.


Someone is lying here, lying about when negotiations began with Israel, about an attack that could never have happened, one that represented convenient aid to Syria when under threat internally.

We seem to be seeing this again as Washington PR agencies, one after the other, sign up with Syria to make the Assads, the inexperienced “eye doctor” and his Israeli spy wife look like vicious victims of evil Jewish plots and NATO, the defense pact that died a slow death back during the 1990s.

So what are the real questions we should be asking about Putin’s trip?  Will they talk about Iran?  Iran who?  Not hardly.

They will be talking about how to either get Assad off the hook or make sure that Syria gets another pro-Soviet government and, best of all, how Egypt can get the same and still keep collecting money from the US while actually an enemy, like Israel.

What we can’t explain, the Rothschild wife, the secret negotiations, the phony attack, how much more?

Do we now know why the Mossad killed the brother and put Bashir in office?

Our only real question is Putin.  Does he or Netanyahu pull the strings?  Do the commies trump the secret societies and financial cartels?

What is for sure, billions will be spent to defeat Obama.  Both Putin and Netanyahu want Romney to win, they even sent half dead Henry Kissinger out to campaign for him.

What is Romney’s job?  He is going to start World War III, slated for very soon and make sure America loses. That’s his job.


Addendum (reader furnished)

Trish Schuh Reports From Deir al-Zur Monday, September 17th, 2007 Trish Schuh is the only Western journalist to actually go to Deir al-Zur, the area where Israeli planes are said to have attacked a missile depot. (Another phony attack, completed during cordial talks between Bashir al Assad and Netanyahu, a fact not known for another year.  Editor’s note.)


SYRIA’S SMOKING GUN by Trish Schuh Sept. 17, 2007 Written for “Syria Comment”


DEIR EZ ZOR, Syria-   On a bridge over the Euphrates River at sundown, neighboring mosques weave a chorus calling Muslims to prayer. This destitute, ramshackle oil town on Iraq’s desert frontier seems calm, despite Israel’s recent raid on a military base outside the city to destroy “Syria’s nuclear program.

The Qamishli-Deir Ez Zor highway, alleged by Israel to be a weapons route for Iraqi insurgents, was also quiet, and there were no heavy construction machinery or building cranes visible in the opposite direction on the road from Deir Ez Zor to Iraq.

At the Syria-Qusayba checkpoint near the Iraq border, I was stopped by the Syrian military.  Across the road on the Iraqi side, sounds of American military operations puttered as blackhawk helicopters flew overhead. “No photos,” said the Syrian military captain. Cameras could draw US sniper fire.

The surrounding terrain is flat barren desert, with visibility extending for miles. It is difficult to see how smugglers, insurgents or anything that moves could penetrate here. This is also where CNN claimed Israel punched “a big hole in the desert” by attacking North Korean nuclear materials. But the big hole could be in CNN’s story.

As far back as 2002, Charles Duelfer of the United Nations Iraq Survey Group called then Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security, John Bolton’s nuclear claims against Syria “exaggerated.”  It was also the assessment of the CIA. In 2004, Muhammad El Baradei chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reiterated that there was no evidence Syria had a nuclear program.

After the invasion of Iraq, former US Air Force Colonel Sam Gardiner identified charges against Syria as one of 50 false news stories created by Israel and the White House to justify war. “Saddam’s nuclear WMDs moved to Syria” was propaganda he said.

Several days ago, after the attack on Syria’s “nuclear program”, I spoke to western oil company officials in Deir Ez Zor.  One technician told me they routinely monitor radiation as part of the refining process.

They registered no heightened levels of nuclear residue in the area as there would have been if the Israelis had hit a North Korean atomic stockpile. Operations and technical foremen put it this way:

“The nuclear claims against Syria are pure bullsh*t.” . The Syrian smoking gun is the complete lack of any mushroom cloud.

Posted in ZIO-NAZI, TurkeyComments Off on Breaking – Putin in Tel Aviv, Sharpening the Knife (updated)

Zio-Nazi Soldier steals $1,000 from Turkish infiltrator


Zio-Nazi reservist sentenced to six months of community service for stealing money from infiltrator who crossed border from Egypt

ed note–remember, this soldier can point to his religion in justifying what he did as referenced from the book of Deuteronomy–

–When the Lord your God brings you into the land he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, he will give you a land with large, flourishing cities you did not build, houses filled with all kinds of good things you did not provide, wells you did not dig, and vineyards and olive groves you did not plant…


An IDF reservist who was convicted of stealing $1,000 from a Turkish infiltrator who crossed Israel’s border with Egypt has been sentenced to six months of community service.

Havening initially denied the allegations, the defendant confessed to the theft just before the complainant was about to testify against him at the Kastina Military Court. He expressed regret over his actions.

Judge Lt. Col. Maya Goldschmidt ordered the defendant to return the money and stated that stealing from an infiltrator who crossed the border is particularly serious crime.

The defendant was on reserve duty on the Egyptian border when a group of infiltrators entered Israel. He asked the Turkish infiltrator for his money and when the latter refused, proceeded to steal the sum.

The soldier served as the battalion commander’s driver and was convicted of theft and conduct unbecoming. Judge Goldschmidt decided not to sentence him to time in prison having taken into account his personal circumstances.

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Zio-Nazi Soldier steals $1,000 from Turkish infiltrator

Shoah’s pages