Archive | August 19th, 2012

Saudi Royal Family is Jewish! King and Prince are all Jew!

NOVANEWS

Banu Qaynuqa tribe = JEWS!!!

Jews are the one in charge of Kabbah and Madina Munawara to make $$$$$$ !!! All the Hajj Money +Umrah Money + Oil money and Saudi taxes goes to the Jews and Israel to kill Muslims!

The More we go to Hajj and Umrah the more Muslim will get killed with that money!

The Banu Qaynuqa (also spelled Banu KainukaBanu KaynukaBanu QainuqaBanu Qaynuqa, Arabic: بنو قينقاع‎) was one of the three main Jewish tribes living in the 7th century of Medina, now in Saudi Arabia. In 624, they were expelled during the Invasion of Banu Qaynuqa, by the Islamic prophet Muhammad for allegedly breaking the treaty known as the Constitution of Medina.

Sirah / The story of Banu Qaynuqa (Jews of Madina) ) يهود المدينة بنو قينقاع

In the 7th century, the Banu Qaynuqa were living in two fortresses in the south-western part of the city of Yathrib, now Medina, having settled there at an unknown date. Although the Banu Qaynuqa bore mostly Arabic names, they were both ethnically and religiously Jewish. They owned no land, earned their living through commerce and craftsmanship, including goldsmithery. The marketplace of Yathrib was located in the area of the town where the Qaynuqa lived. The Banu Qaynuqa were allied with the local Arab tribe of Khazraj and supported them in their conflicts with the rival Arab tribe of Aws.

‘In the 1960′s the “Sawt Al Arab” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt, and the Yemen Broadcasting Station in Sana’a confirmed the Jewish Ancestry of the Saudi Family. More important readings! 

King Faisal Al-Saud at that time could not deny his family’s kindred with the Jews when he declared to the Washington Post on Sept. 17, 1969 stating: “We, The Saudi family, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslem Authority which shows any antagonism to the Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (Arabia) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.” That was the declaration of King Faisal AL-Saud Bin Abdul Aziz! ‘ Read More!

Are The Saudi “Royal Family Jewish?

THE SAUDI FAMILY CONCEAL THEIR JEWISH ORIGIN

The Saudi Dynasty:

Where Do They Come From and Who Is their Real Ancestor?

Part I

Mohammad Sakher, who was ordered, killed by the Saudi Regime for the following findings:

1. Are the Saudi Family members belonging to the Tribe of Anza ben Wa’el as they allege to be?
2. Is Islam their actual religion?
3. Are they of an Arab Origin at all?

The following facts will blot out all the allegations of the Saudi Family and will refute all the false statements made by those hypocrites who sold their conscience to this family by falsifying and interpolating the real history of the Saudi Family; I mean the Journalists and historians who, for a financial temporal reward, have inserted and attached the genealogy of this family to our Great Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) alleging that the Saudis are viceroys of our Almighty Allah on the Earth. It is quite clear that such a flattery is intended to vindicate and justify the Saudis’ Crimes and Atrocities, so as to firmly stabilize their Throne and to prop the pillars of their despotic regime. Which is extremely dictatorial and completely rejected by our great Islamic Faith.

Israel & Saudi Arabia are Sisters! Because Saudi King, his family and Amir‘s are all Jews!!!

Why Muslim are in hibernation for 1400 years?

Maybe because Muslims are Lazy! or Ignorant! or irresponsible! and  they leave everything to Allah meanwhile they  simply DO NOTHING! But yapping all day long while Jews owned, operate and use Kabbah and Medina for $$$!!!!!!

Kingship is accursed in our Islamic Religion, in the Holy Qur’aan, because it is an imposed authority of One Person and his Family members to suppress the people and silence any other voice “of opposition” to the king’s despotic and completely dictatorial rules. So kings are denounced in the Holy Qur’aan in this verse: “Kings, when they enter a country, despoil it, and make the noblest of its people the meanest. Thus do they behave.” (27-34)

Lifestyle Of Wahhabi/Saudi Prince Al Walid bin Tallal

Nevertheless, the Saudi Family ignores this Qur’aanic verse, and alleges falsely that they are the strongest believers in the Holy Qur’aan, while in interim; they issue their strict orders to prohibit such Qur’aanic verses from being recited on the radio’s or the TVs. At the same time, such verses are strictly forbidden by them to appear written on any journal, because their recitation or printing does affect their Seat of Majesty!

WHO ARE THESE SAUDIS? WHERE ARE THEY FROM? AND WHAT IS THEIR FINAL GOAL?

The Saudi Family members know perfectly well the Muslims all over the world have already known their real Jewish Origin. Muslims have now known all their bloody past, which was, and still is stuck in the same mire of Brutal Despotism and Atrocity. Presently, they exert their utmost efforts to conceal their Jewish Origin by covering themselves with the cloak of the Islamic Religion, so as to try to keep their real Jewish Ancestry hidden in the dark by connecting their family tree with our Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH).

They forget or ignore that Islam does never give any favorable attention to genealogy or “Family Trees”; it favors and honors indiscriminately all human beings whose actions and words are commensurate with the doctrines of the Holy Qur’aan as confirmed by the following Qur’aanic verse:

“O Mankind! We created you from a single (Pair) of a male and female, and made you into nations and tribes, so that you may know each other (not that you may despise each other.) Verily, the most honored by you in the Sight of Allah is (he who is) the most righteous of you.” (49-13)

Anyone who is iniquitous and blasphemous cannot affiliate him/her self to our great Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) even though he/she may be the closest blood relative to him. Bilal, the Abyssinian slave, who was a faithful Muslim, was much more honored by Islam than Abu Lahab, the pagan, who was the real blood uncle of our Prophet. In Islam there is no Favoritism. Allah sets the degree of comparison in Islam according to the person’s piety and not according to his/her worldly status of affiliation to any dynasty.

Saudi Royal Family Are Kuffar British Agents! by AlMalahimMedia

Who is the Real Ancestor of the Clan of Saud?

In the year 851 A.H. a group of men from Al Masaleekh Clan, which was a branch of Anza Tribe, formed a caravan for buying cereals (wheat and corn) and other foodstuff from Iraq, and transporting it back to Najd. The head of that group was a man called Sahmi Bin Hathlool. The caravan reached Basra, where the members of the group went to a cereal merchant who was a Jew, called Mordakhai bin Ibrahim bin Moshe. During their bargaining with that merchant, the Jew asked them: “Where are you from?” They answered: “From Anza Tribe; a Clan of Al Masaleekh.” Upon hearing that name, the Jew started to hug so affectionately each on the them saying that he, himself, was also from the clan of Al Masaleekh, but he had come to reside in Basra (Iraq) in consequence to a family feud between his father and some members of Anza Tribe.

After he recounted to them his fabricated narrative, he ordered his servants to load all of the camels with wheat, dates, and tamman; a remarkable deed so generous that astonished the Masaleekh men and aroused their pride to find such an affectionate (cousin) in Iraq-the source of sustenance; they believed each word he said, and, because he was a rich merchant of the food commodities which they were badly in need, they accepted him (even though he was a Jew concealed under the garb of an Arab from Al Masaleekh clan.)

Saudis “turning Mecca into Las Vegas”

When the caravan was ready to depart returning to Najd, that Jewish merchant asked tem to accept his company, because he intended to go with them to his original homeland, Najd. Upon hearing that from him, they wholeheartedly welcomed him with a very cheerful attitude.

So that (concealed) Jew reached Najd with the caravan. In Najd, he started to promulgate a lot of propaganda for himself through his companions (his alleged cousins), a fact, which gathered around him a considerable number of new supporters. But, unexpectedly, he confronted a campaign of opposition to his views led by Sheikh Saleh Salman Abdullah Al Tamimi, who was a Muslim religious preacher in Al-Qaseem.

The radius of his preaching area included Najd, Yemen, and Hijaz, a fact which compelled the Jew (the Ancestor of the present Saud family) to depart from Al Qaseem to Al Ihsa, where he changed his name (Mordakhai) to Markan bin Dir’iya near Al-Qateef, where he started to spread among the inhabitants a fabricated story about the shield of our Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that it was taken as a booty by an Arab pagan in consequence of the Battle of Uhud between the Arab pagans and the Muslims. “That shield,” he said, “was sold by the Arab pagan to a Jewish clan called Banu Qunaiqa who preserved it as a treasure!

Saudi Arabia: Arm Sales & Corruption!

He gradually enhanced his position among the Bedouins through such stories, which indicated how the Jewish clans in Arabia were so influential, and deserved high esteem. He gained some personal importance among the Bedouins, and decided to permanently settle there, at Dir’iya town, neat Al Qateef, which he decided to be his “Capital” on the Persian Gulf. He aspired to make it his springboard for establishing a Jewish Kingdom in Arabia.

In order to fulfill his ambitious scheme, he started to approach the desert Arab Bedouins for support of his position, and then gradually, he declared himself as their king!

LIfestyle Of Wahabi Prince Walid bin Tallal – Its Not Las Vegas Its Riyadh

At that juncture, Ajaman Tribe, together with Banu Khaled Tribe became fully aware of that Jewish cunning plan after they had verified his true identity, and decided to put an end to him. They attacked his town and conquered it, but before arresting him he had escaped by the skin of his teeth.

That Jewish ancestor of the Saudi Family, Mordakhai, sought shelter in a farm at that time called Al-Malibeed-Ghusaiba near Al-Arid, which is called at our present time Al-Riyadh.

Arab Royal family extravagant and selfish life style!!

He requested the owner of that farm to grant him asylum. The farmer was so hospitable that he immediately gave him sanctuary. But no longer than a month had he (Mordakhai) stayed there, when he assassinated the landlord and all members of his family, pretending that they were killed by an invading band of thieves. Then he pretended that he had bought that real estate from them before that catastrophe happened to them! Accordingly, he had the right to reside there as a landlord. He then gave a new name to that place: Al-Diriya-the same name as that he had lost.

That Jewish ancestor (Mordakhai) of the Saudi Family, was able to establish a “Guest House” called “Madaffa” on the land he usurped from his victims, and gathered around him a group of hypocrites who started to spread out false propaganda for him that he was a prominent Arab Sheikh. He plotted against Sheikh Saleh Salman Abdulla Al Tamimi, his original enemy, and caused his assassination in the mosque of the town called Al-Zalafi.

Saudi Royal Family Are Kuffar British Agents! by AlMalahimMedia

After that, he felt satisfied and safe to make Al-Diriya his permanent home. There he practiced polygamy at a wide scale, and indeed, he begot a lot of children whom he gave pure Arab names.

Ever since his descendants grew up in number and power under the same name of Saudi Clan, they have followed his steps in practicing under ground activities and conspiracies against the Arab nation. They illegally seized rural sectors and farmlands and assassinated every person who tried to oppose their evil plans. They used all kinds of deceit for reaching their goals; they bought the conscience of their dissidents; they offered their women and money to influential people in that area, particularly those who started to write the true biography of that Jewish family; they bribed the writers of history in order to purify their ignominious history, and to make their lineage related to the most prominent Arab tribes such as Rabi’a, Anza, and Al Masaleekh.

A conspicuous hypocrite in our era, whose name is Mohammad Amin Al Tamimi- Director/Manager of the contemporary Libraries of the Saudi Kingdom, made up a genealogical tree (family tree) for this Jewish family (the Saudis), connecting them to our Great Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). For his false work, he received a reward of 35 thousand Egyptian pounds from the then Saudi Ambassador to Cairo, Egypt, in the year 1362 A.H.-1943 A.D. The name of that Ambassador is Ibrahim Al-Fadel.

As aforementioned, the Jewish ancestor of the Saudi family, (Mordakhai), practiced polygamy by marrying a lot of Arab women and begot many children; his polygamous practice is, at the present time, being carried out “to the letter” by his descendants; they cling to his martial heritage!

One of Mordakhai’s sons called Al-Maraqan, arabized from the Jewish root Mack-ren, begot a son called Mohammad, then another son called Saud, which is the name of the present day Saudi Dynasty.

Descendants of Saud (the present day Saudi Family) started a campaign of assassination of the prominent leaders of the Arab Tribes under the pretence that those leaders were apostates; renegading from the Islamic Religion, and deserting their Qur’aanic doctrines; so they deserved the Saudi condemnation and slaughter!

In the History Book of the Saudi Family pages 98-101, their private family historian declares that the Saudi dynasty considers all people of Najd blasphemous, so their blood must be shed, their properties confiscated, and their females taken as concubines; no Muslim is authentic in his/her belief unless he/she belongs (affiliates) to the sect of Mohammad bin Abdul Wahab (whose origins are also Jewish from Turkey.) His doctrines give authority to the Saudi Family to destroy villages with all their inhabitants-males including children, and to sexually assault their women; stab the bellies of the pregnant, and cut off the hands of their children, then burn them! They are further authorized by such a brutal doctrine to plunder all the properties of which they call renegades (not following their Wahabi sect.)
Their hideous Jewish family has, in fact, done all that kind of atrocities in the name of their false religious sect (the Wahabi), which has actually been invented by a Jew so as to sow the seeds of terror in the hearts if people in towns and villages. This Jewish Dynasty has been committing such brutal atrocities ever since 1163 A.H. They have named the whole Arabian Peninsula after their family name (Saudi Arabia) as if the whole region is their own personal real estate, and that all other inhabitants are their mere servants or slaves, toiling day and night for the pleasure of their masters (The Saudi Family.)

They are completely holding the natural wealth of the country as their own property. If any poor person from the common people raises his/her voice complaining against any of the despotic rules of this Jewish Dynasty, the Dynasty cuts off his/her head in the public square. A princess of theirs once visited Florida, USA, with her retinue; she rented 90 (ninety) Suite rooms in a Grand Hotel for about One Million dollars a night! Can anyone of her subjects comment about that extravagant event? If he/she does, his/her fate is quite known: DEATH WITH THE EDGE OF THE SAUDI SWORD IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE!!!!!

WITNESSES ON THE JEWISH ANCESTRY OF THIS SAUDI FAMILY:

In the 1960′s the “Sawt al Arab ” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt, and the Yemen Broadcasting Station in Sana’a confirmed the Jewish ancestry of the Saudi family.

King Faisal Al-Saud at that time could not deny his family’s kindred with the Jews when he declared to the Washington Post on Sept.17, 1969 stating: “We, the Saudi Family, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslim Authority which shows any antagonism to Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (Arabia) is the fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.” That was the declaration of King Faisal Al-Saud bin Abdul Aziz!!!

Hafez Wahbi, the Saudi legal advisor, mentioned in his book entitled “The Peninsula of Arabia” that King Abdul Aziz A-Saud, who died in 1953, had said: “Our message (Saudi Massage) encountered the opposition of all Arab Tribes. My grandfather, Saud Awal, once imprisoned a number of the Sheikhs of Matheer Tribe; and when another group of the same tribe came to intercede for the release of the prisoners, Saud Awal gave orders to his men to cut off the heads of all the prisoners, then, he wanted to humiliate and derogate the interceders by inviting them to eat from a banquet he prepared from the cooked flesh of his victims whose cut off heads he place in the top of the food platters! The interceders became so alarmed and declined to eat the flesh of their relatives, and, because of their refusal to eat, he ordered his men to cut off their heads too. That hideous crime was committed by that self imposed king to innocent people whose guilt was their opposition to his most cruel and extremely despotic rules.

Hafez Wahbi states further that King Abdul Aziz Al-Saud related that bloody true story to the Sheikhs of the Matheer Tribs, who visited him in order to intercede for their prominent leader at that time, Faisal Al Darweesh, who was the king’s prisoner. He related that story to them in order to prevent them from interceding for the release of their Sheikh; otherwise, they would meet the same fate; he killed the Sheikh and used his blood as an ablution liquid from him just before he stood up for his prayer (after the false sect doctrine of the Wahabi). The guilt of Faisal Darweesh at that time was that he had criticized King Abdul Aziz Al-Saud when the king signed the document which the English Authorities prepared in 1922 as a declaration for giving Palestine to the Jews; his signature was obtained in the conference held at Al Aqeer in 1922.

That was and still is the system of this regime of the Jewish family) (Saudi Family). All its goals are: plundering the wealth of the country, robbing, falsifying, and committing all kinds of atrocity, iniquity, and blasphemy-all are executed in compliance with their self invented Wahabi Sect which legalizes the chopping of the heads of their opposing subjects.

Source

Read More from different sources about Saudi Kings are blood thirsty Jews!

Read More from different sources about Saudi Kings are blood thirsty Jews!

Read More from different sources about Saudi Kings are blood thirsty Jews!

Now you also do your own research to find the truth! Do not only depend on one source but rather do your own research too!

Because the unbelievable warm and strong relationship between USA Politicians, Banks, Jews, and Saudi Kings and Business People, Osama Bin Laden with Carlyle Group is bloody amazing!!!

 

Posted in Saudi Arabia41 Comments

Salafi Leader: No Freedom in Islam; Apostates Must be Persecuted

Posted in EgyptComments Off on Salafi Leader: No Freedom in Islam; Apostates Must be Persecuted

Muslim Prayers of Hate

Posted in Saudi ArabiaComments Off on Muslim Prayers of Hate

CIA’S MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ‘CRUCIFIES’ OPPONENTS IN EGYPT

NOVANEWS

Egyptian Security forces rescuing one of those scourged by Muslim Brotherhood supporters. Muslim Brotherhood ‘Crucifies’ Opponents.

Middle East media confirm that during an August 2012 rampage, Muslim Brotherhood operatives “crucified those opposing Egyptian President Muhammad Morsi naked on trees in front of the presidential palace while abusing others.”

Several Arabic websites – including Arab NewsAl Khabar News,Dostor Watany, and Egypt Now – reported that people were being “crucified.”

A Sky News Arabic correspondent in Cairo confirmed that protestors belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood crucified those opposing Egyptian President Muhammad Morsi naked on trees in front of the presidential palace while abusing others.

The Muslim Brotherhood works for the CIA and MI6.

A 9 August 2012 report by El Balad, a widely read Egyptian website, gives the details:

“Supporters of Tawfik Okasha, another vocal critic of President Morsi – the one who widely disseminated the graphic video of a Muslim apostate being slaughtered to cries of ‘Allahu Akbar’ -gathered around the presidential palace, only to be surrounded by Brotherhood supporters, who ‘attacked them with sticks, knives, and Molotov cocktails, crucifying some of them on trees, leading to the deaths of two and the wounding of dozens.'”

Muslim Brotherhood ‘Crucifies‘ OpponentsAttacks Secular Media 

The Muslim Brotherhood in the White House.

“Far from condemning these terrorists, Al Azhar, Egypt’s most authoritative Islamic institution, has just issued a fatwa calling for more violence and oppression, saying that ‘fighting participants in anti-Muslim Brotherhood demonstrations planned for 24 August is a religious obligation.’

“Militant Muslims crucifying their opponents is a regular feature of the Islamic world—recent cases coming from the Ivory Coast, wheretwo Christian brothers were crucified, similarly by supporters of a Muslim president who ousted a Christian; Indonesia, where Islamic separatists crucified a fellow Muslim for being a military informant; and in Iraq, where Muslim militants crucified Christian children.”

Posted in EgyptComments Off on CIA’S MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ‘CRUCIFIES’ OPPONENTS IN EGYPT

The Saudi Royal Family Are Crypto-Jews

NOVANEWS

By Abdulaziz Saud

THE SAUDI DYNASTY: FROM WHERE IS IT? AND WHO IS THE REAL ANCESTOR OF THIS FAMILY?

RESEARCH AND PRESENTATION OF: MOHAMMAD SAKHER , who was ordered killed by the Saudi Regime for the following findings:

1. Are the Saudi Family members belonging to the Tribe of ANZA BEN WA’EL as they allege to be?

2. Is Islam their actual religion?

3. Are they of an ARAB ORIGIN at all?

In the year 851 A.H. a group of men from AL MASALEEKH CLAN, which was a branch of ANZA Tribe, formed a caravan for buying cereals (wheat and corn) and other food stuff from IRAQ, and transporting it back to NAJD. The head of that group was a man called SAHMI BIN HATHLOOL. The caravan reached BASRA, where the members of the group went to a cereal merchant who was a Jew, Called MORDAKHAI BIN IBRAHIM BIN MOSHE’. During their bargaining with that merchant, the Jew asked them : “Where are you from?” They answered: “From ANZA TRIBE; a clan of AL MASALEEKH.” Upon hearing that name, the Jew started to hug so affectionately each one of them saying that he, himself, was also from the clan of AL MASALEEKH, but he had come to reside in BASRA (IRAQ) in consequence to a family feud between his father and some members of ANZA Tribe.

After he recounted to them his fabricated narrative, he ordered his servants to load all the camels of the clan’s members with wheat, dates and tamman; a remarkable deed so generous that astonished the MASALEEKH men and aroused their pride to find such an affectionate (cousin) in IRAQ- the source of their sustenance; they believed each word he said , and , because he was a rich merchant of the food commodities which they were badly in need, they liked him (even though he was a Jew concealed under the garb of an Arab from AL MASALEEKH clan).

When the caravan was ready to depart returning to NAJD, that Jewish Merchant asked them to accept his company, because he intended to go with them to his original homeland, NAJD. Upon hearing that from him, they wholeheartedly welcomed him with a very cheerful attitude.

So that (concealed) Jew reached NAJD with the caravan. In NAJD, he started to promulgate a lot of propaganda for himself through his companions (his alleged cousins), a fact, which gathered around him a considerable number of new supporters; but, unexpectedly, he confronted a campaign of opposition to his views led by SHEIKH SALEH SALMAN ABDULLA AL TAMIMI, who was a Muslem religious preacher in AL-QASEEM. The radius of his preaching area included Najd, Yemen, and Hijaz, a fact which compelled the Jew (the Ancestor of the present SAUDI FAMILY to depart from AL QASEEM to AL IHSA, where he changed his name (MORDAKHAI) To MARKHAN BIN IBRAHIM MUSA. Then he changed the location of his residence and settled at a place called DIR’IYA near AL-QATEEF, where he started to spread among the inhabitants a fabricated story about the shield of our Prophet MOHAMMAD (p.b.u.h), that it was taken as a booty by an Arab Pagan in consequence of OHOD Battle between the Arab pagans and the Muslems. “That shield, he said, was sold by the Arab Pagan to a Jewish Clan called BANU QUNAIQA’ who preserved it as a treasure! He gradually enhanced his position among the Bedouins through such stories which indicated how the Jewish clans in Arabia were so influential and deserved high esteem. He gained some personal importance among the Bedouins, and decided to settle permanently there, at DIR’IYA town, near AL QATEEF, which he decided to be his (Capital) on the Persian Gulf. He aspired to make it his spring board for establishing a Jewish Kingdom in Arabia.

In order to fulfill his ambitious scheme, he started to approach the desert Arab Bedouins for support of his position, then gradually, he declared himself as their king!

At that juncture, AJAMAN Tribe together with BANU KHALED Tribe became fully aware of that Jewish cunning plan after they had verified his true identity, and decided to put an end to him. They attacked his town and conquered it, but before arresting him he had escaped by the skin of his teeth.

That Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY, (MORDAKHAI), sought shelter in a farm called at that time AL-MALIBEED-GHUSAIBA near AL-ARID, which is called at our present time : AL-RIYADH.

He requested the owner of that farm to grant him an asylum. The farmer was so hospitable that he immediately gave him sanctuary. But that Jew (MORDAKHAI), no longer than a month had he stayed there, when he assassinated the land lord and all members of his family, pretending that all were killed by an invading band of thieves. Then he pretended that he had bought that real estate from them before that catastrophe happened to them! Accordingly, he had the right to reside there as a land lord. He then gave a new name to that place: He named it AL-DIRIYA – the same name as that he had lost.

That Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY (MORDAKHAI), was quick to establish a “GUEST HOUSE” called “MADAFFA” on the land he usurped from his victims, and gathered around him a group of hypocrites who started to spread out false propaganda for him that he was a prominent Arab Sheikh. He plotted against Sheikh SALEH SALMAN ABDULLA AL TAMIMI, his original enemy, and caused his assassination in the mosque of the town called (AL-ZALAFI).

After that, he felt satisfied and safe to make (AL-DIRIYA) his permanent home. There he practiced polygamy at a wide scale, and indeed, he begot a lot of children whom he gave pure Arab names.

Ever since his descendants grew up in number and power under the name of SAUDI CLAN, they have followed his steps in practicing under ground activities and conspiracies against the Arab Nation. They illegally seized rural sectors and farm lands, and assassinated every person who tried to oppose their evil plans. They used all kinds of deceit for reaching their goals: they bought the conscience of their dissidents; they offered their women and money to influential people in that area, particularly to those who started to write the true biography of that Jewish Family; they bribed writers of history in order to purify their ignominious history, and make their lineage related to the most prominent Arab Tribes such as RABI’A, ANZA, and ALMASALEEKH.

A conspicuous hypocrite in our era whose name is MOHAMMAD AMIN AL TAMIMI- Director/Manager of the contemporary Libraries of the SAUDI KINGDOM, made up a genealogical tree (FAMILY TREE) for this JEWISH FAMILY (THE SAUDIS), connecting them to our Great Prophet, MOHAMMAD (P.B.U.H). For his false work, he received a reward of 35 (THIRTY FIVE) THOUSAND EYPTIAN POUNDS from the then SAUDI AMBASSADOR TO CAIRO, EGYPT, in the year 1362 AH.- 1943 A.D. The name of that Ambassador is: IBRAHIM AL-FADEL.

As aforementioned, the Jewish Ancestor of the SAUDI FAMILY, (MORDAKHAI), practiced polygamy by marrying a lot of Arab women and begot many children; his polygamous practice is, at the present time, being carried out ” to the letter” by his descendants; they cling to his marital heritage!

One of MORDAKHAI’S sons called AL-MAQARAN, arabized from the Jewish root (MACK-REN) begot a son called Mohammad, then another son called SAUD, which is the name of the present day SAUDI DYNASTY.

Descendants of SAUD (the present day SAUDI FAMILY )started a campaign of assassination of the prominent leaders of the Arab Tribes under the pretence that those leaders were apostates; renegading from the Islamic Religion, and deserting their Koranic doctrines; so they deserved the SAUDI condemnation and slaughter!

In the History Book of the SAUDI FAMILY pages (98-101), their private family historian declares that the SAUDI DYNASTY considers all the people of NAJD blasphemous; so their blood must be shed, their properties confiscated, and their females be taken as concubines; no Muslim is authentic in his /her belief unless he/she belongs (affiliates) to the sect of MOHAMMAD BIN ABDUL WAHAB, (whose origins are also Jewish from TURKEY.) His doctrines give authority to the SAUDI FAMILY to destroy the villages with all their inhabitants-males including children, and to sexually assault their women; stab the bellies of the pregnant, and cut off the hands of their children, then burn them! They are further authorized by such a BRUTAL DOCTRINE to plunder all the properties of whom they call renegades (not following their Wahabi Sect).

Their hideous Jewish Family has, in fact, done all that kind of atrocities in the name of their false religious sect (the Wahabi), which was actually invented by a Jew so as to sow the seeds of terror in the hearts of people in towns and villages. This Jewish Dynasty has been committing such brutal atrocities ever since 1163 A.H. They have named the whole Arabian Peninsula after their family name (SAUDI ARABIA) as if the whole region is their own personal real estate, and that all other inhabitants are their mere servants or slaves, toiling day and night for the pleasure of their masters (THE SAUDI FAMILY).

They are completely holding the natural wealth of the country as their own property. If any poor person from the common people raises his/her voice complaining against any of the despotic rules of this Jewish Dynasty, (the Dynasty) cuts off his/her head in the public square. A princess of theirs once visited FLORIDA, USA, with her retinue; she rented 90 (NINETY) Suite rooms in a Grand Hotel for about One Million Dollars a night! Can anyone of their subjects comment about that extravagant event? If he/she does, his/her fate is quite known: DEATH WITH THE EDGE OF THE SAUDI SWORD IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE!!!!!!

Witnesses on the Jewish Ancestry of this Saudi Family:

In the 1960’s the “SAWT AL ARAB” Broadcasting Station in Cairo, Egypt, and the YEMEN Broadcasting Station in SANA’A confirmed the Jewish Ancestry of the SAUDI Family.

King FAISAL AL-SAUD at that time could not deny his family’s kindred with the JEWS when he declared to the WASHINGTON POST on September 17, 1969 stating: “WE, THE SAUDI FAMILY, are cousins of the Jews: we entirely disagree with any Arab or Muslem [sic] Authority which shows any antagonism to the Jews; but we must live together with them in peace. Our country (ARABIA) is the Fountain head from where the first Jew sprang, and his descendants spread out all over the world.” That was the declaration of KING FAISAL AL-SAUD BIN ABDUL AZIZ!!!!!

HAFEZ WAHBI, The SAUDI Legal Adviser, mentioned in his book entitled: “THE PENINSULA OF ARABIA” that KING ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD, who died in 1953, had said : “Our Message (SAUDI MESSAGE) encountered the opposition of all Arab Tribes; my grandfather, SAUD AWAL, once imprisoned a number of the Sheikhs of MATHEER Tribe; and when another group of the same tribe came to intercede for the release of the prisoners, SAUD AWAL gave orders to his men to cut off the heads of all the prisoners, then, he wanted to humiliate and derogate the interceders by inviting them to eat from a banquet he prepared from the cooked flesh of his victims whose cut off heads he placed on the top of the food platters!! The interceders became so alarmed and declined to eat the flesh of their relatives; and, because of their refusal to eat, he ordered his men to cut off their heads too. That hideous crime was committed by that self imposed king to innocent people whose guilt was their opposition to his most cruel and extremely despotic rules.

HAFEZ WAHBI, states further that King ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD related that bloody true story to the Sheikhs of the MATHEER Tribe, who visited him in order to intercede for their prominent leader at that time, FAISAL AL DARWEESH, who was the king’s prisoner. He related that story to them in order to prevent them from interceding for the release of their Sheikh; otherwise, they would face the same fate; He killed the Sheikh and used his blood as an ablution liquid for him just before he stood up for his prayer (after the false sect doctrine of the Wahabi); The guilt of FAISAL DARWEESH at that time was that he had criticized King ABDUL AZIZ AL-SAUD when the king signed the document which the English Authorities prepared in 1922 as a declaration for giving PALESTINE to the Jews; his signature was obtained in the conference held at AL AQEER in 1922.

That was and still is the system of this Regime of the JEWISH FAMILY (SAUDI FAMILY): All its goals are: plundering the wealth of the country, robbing, falsifying, and committing all kinds of atrocity, iniquity, and blasphemy-all are executed in compliance with their self invented Wahabi Sect which legalizes the chopping of the heads of their opposing subjects.

Posted in Saudi Arabia8 Comments

The Birth of AI-Wahabi Movement And it’s Historic Roots

NOVANEWS

Prepared by: Intelligence Colonel Sa’id Mahrnud Najrn AI-‘Arniri

167The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.
-6-
In the name of God the most compassionate the most merciful

Picture of Saddam Hussein

Keep your enemy in front ofyour eyes. Never let him behind your back Leader President; Saddam Hussein (God save & protect him)

The Birth ofAI-Wahabi Movement and it’s Historic Roots

Preface

1. The purpose ofthis study is to learn about the history ofAI-Wahabi Movement and the harmful
elements it contains.

AI-Wahabi movement claims that; it strives to recant all kinds of polytheism, but such allegations at
the time ofpractice have transformed into the killing ofMuslims, destructing, demolishing, and
promoting the turmoil. So we can say that such behavior with its pure superficial and discriminating
teachings is nothing but a deadly weapon in the hand ofthe occupation and the enemies ofIslam who
use AI-Wahabi Movement in the political arena to prevent the unity ofMuslims.

We have to frankly say that; AI-Wahabi’s superficial and false teachings, and grasping on to the shell
is the main obstacle standing in the way ofMuslims’ goal to unit, and the biggest cause ofthe killing,
dispersing, and breaking up ofMuslims.

This kind of hostility towards Muslims, antagonizing them, considering them disbelievers, hitting
them, insulting them, and hurting them reveals an ugly and dangerous face ofAI-Wahabi features
which depicts it as a destructive and chaotic group raising the slogan ofdestruction, savageness and
harshness.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

2. AI-Wahabi today is subconsciously working in all its power on promoting occupation in all its
power in order to achieve its despicable desires. The Wahabis have worn the Muslim robe
inside out therefore; they couldn’t apprehend any ofthe Muslim goals, because how is it
possible for someone who seeks the help ofinfidels to speak ofunity? They sign treaties of
peace and friendship with the criminals, surrender and bow in front ofthe masters ofrotten
politics.

3. Therefore; I wanted in my study to focus on the history ofthis movement from the stand point
ofits relation with the British government and how Britain had employed all its spies in
Muslim countries in order to establish and spread this movement to destroy Muslim religion
and create heterodoxies in Islam.

I also wanted to touch on the creator ofthis movement; Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, his
meetings with Muhammad Bin Su’ud and their agreement to support each other, and in
conclusion show opinions ofhistorians and writers who discussed this movement, and the
history ofthe Su’ud Family which many have agreed that it is on ofthe destructive religious
movements that is conceived, extreme and aiming to destroy Islam through Jews and British.
The Purpose:

4. To find the connection between this movement and the British government and how they found
the so called; Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, and his meetings with the leaders ofSa’ud
Family to facilitate their suspicious plans which aim at striking at Islam and create division
among Muslims. The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

First Topic:

Britain and its animosity towards Islam
.:. Britain and fabrication ofbeliefs to serve dispersion
.:. Britain’s goals to weaken the Muslim religion
.:. The British plans to dominate the Muslim countries
.:. How Britain deployed its spies and created differences among Muslims.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. Britain and making up of beliefs to serve dispersion.

5. Colonialism continues to look for ways to force its power, and still uses its old slogan
(divide and rule), and one ofthe most important methods of achieve that is to create a
decadent environment ofdisbelieving and immoral society therefore; colonialism tops
the list ofimportant and major factors which create the environment of disbelieve and
immorality in a Muslim society, and in creating a sense ofdistrust among Muslim
groups and false accusations. We will not be exaggerating ifwe say that the most
successful methods used by colonialism to weaken the strength ofMuslims and
demolish Islam; are the methods ofdividing, discriminating and fabricating believes
and creating profits.

In order to reveal the reasons which made the colonialism go this rout and the goals
desired from it, and the methods used to achieve such goals; we have to mention few
things before we go into our main topic.

Britain’s objectives from the weakening of the Muslim religion:

6. Colonialism countries face so many obstacles among each other when attempting to
dominate powerless countries, for the purpose ofplundering the material and immaterial
wealth ofthese countries. It was never as simple as to occupy a country and have its
people welcome them with open arms. At minimum, at the very beginning they are
faced with many problems and obstacles. There were so many factors that made people
oppose the colonialism such as; nationalism, language, culture, and religion. Some of
these factors had temporary effects on the fight against colonialism, and lost their
effectiveness gradually until they lost their impact eventually. The only factor remained
as a well fortified barrier against the goals of colonialism is; the influence ofreligion on
people, with Islam in the forefront. Since the day when the representative of colonialism.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. stood in the British House ofCommons holding the Koran in his hand saying: ( Europe
has to know that; as long as this book is the guide to all Muslims, we will not be able to
establish the foundations for our colonialism policy in these countries) and up to this
day, Islam is considered the largest barrier facing colonialism, and the biggest threat to
its interests because; Islam has distinguished characteristics each alone stands as a
mountain in the way of achieving the goals colonialism the thing that all other religions
lack.

The teachings of colonialism [I think that this is a misprint and the correct sentence
should be the teachings ofIslam] and its political worship rituals, have always been a
danger to colonialism and its objectives because; Islam refuses all forms of colonialism
and exploitation in any shape or form, condemn, motivate Muslims to fight injustice and tyrants, calls for struggle to bring social fairness in all areas on the face of earth, and to free the weak from slavery and occupation. And it goes without saying that this struggle is not only to free Muslims
alone, but it is for saving all weak nations in the world and free them.

7. Therefore; Islam finds itself obligated to extend a helping hand to all liberation
movements as much as possible “0 ye who believe! Take not my enemies and yours as
friends (or protectors) – offering them your love”l, “These are the ones who wait and
watch about you” 2, “Let not the Believers take for protectors Unbelievers, rather than
Believers”3 then it puts forth the motto of adhering to God for he is the ultimate master
“And hold fast all together, by the Rope which Allah stretched out for you, and be not
divided among yourselves”4 “A Believer is a brother of another Believer, they are like
one body if one part is in pain the rest ofthe body parts suffer the same way”.
“Muhammad is the messenger ofAllah; and those who are with him are strong against
unbelievers, but compassionate amongst each other.” 5. Muslims are responsible one to
another and get angry at infidels and don’t get into compromises with them, “Truly
Allah loves those who fight in his cause in battle array, as ifthey were a solid cemented
structure”6. This meaning has always been the source ofinspiration and strength for all
Muslims in their struggle against tyrants and arrogant throughout history. Such content
ofIslam has created in the heart ofIslam, all this movement, enthusiasm, creativity,
change, and steadiness in fighting injustice. Ifwe were to study all uprisings which took
place in the recent century; we would have more dearly found the role ofIslamic
teaching in stirring those people against injustice, arrogance and oppression. Friend and
enemy admit, for example, admit to the dynamics prompted by Islam in the liberation
revolution ofthe Algerian people which threw the French occupation outside the

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. country. About this wrote two well known writers; (Collette) and (Francis Johnson)7
(No doubt that Islam had a great influence on the Algerians, demand for freedom, and
the Algerians have become aware since day one ofthe French occupation’s objective to
destroy Islam, and based on this they come to realize that Islam is their way to
liberation, and they all have to Foot Notes:
1 Al-Mumtahinah: 1 [CL: verse 1 from the Koran Chapter Al-Mumtahinah]
2 Al-Nisa’: 141 [CL: verse 141 from the Koran Chapter Al-Nisa’]
3 Al ‘Urnran: 28 [CL: verse 28 from Koran Chapter Al-‘Urnran]
4 Al ‘Urnran: 103 [CL: verse 103 from Koran Chapter Al-‘Urnran]
5 AI-Fath: 29 [CL: verse 29 from Koran Chapter Al-Fath]
6 Al-Saff: 4 [CL: verse 4 from Koran Chapter Al-Saff]
7 “2 schools” cited from Propagation and Colonialism in Arabic Countries by Dr. Mustafa Khalid; hold on to Islam in order to be liberated).

And when colonialism found it hard to penetrate Islam, it started to look for a successful
way to fight it and started to use all its power and capabilities to remove this obstacle, and tried all kinds ofmethods to achieve its objective. Such methods are the following:

A. Direct confrontation:

First, by direct military confrontation such as the Crusaders war, and military occupation ofIslamic countries as in the case ofLibya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Algeria and others.
Second, by attacking Islamic teachings by means of; twisting and reversing their principles, accusing Islam, and slandering its sanctuaries.

B. Indirect confrontation:

First, promote immoralities and corruption among Muslims to weaken their
adherence to religion.

Second, promote feelings of nationalist and patriotism to divide individuals as
well as groups into different parties in Islamic countries.

Third, create division and dissimilarities by spreading accusations, mistrust, and
suspension among Muslims.

The British Plans to Dominate Islamic Countries:

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

In 1973, the autobiography ofthe British spy Humfer in regards to his work in Iraq and
Istanbul was translated, and it included the British plans to dominate the Muslim
countries. Great Britain has been, since long time ago, thinking about keeping its
influence on its many colonies in India, China, the Middle East and others. It is true that
it wasn’t actually controlling big parts of these countries because; it was in the hands of
its own people, but its policy was a successful and effective policy, and it used to think
twice.

a. Once to continue controlling what has been practically controlled.

b. And once to add to its properties what hasn’t been practically controlled.

And based on this, the British government had allocated special committees in every
part ofthese countries particularly to study the task:

Footnotes:

I Humfer’s Autobiography

First: India

Through the “Eastern Company ofIndia”, whose apparent role was strictly commercial,
yet deep inside was to strengthen the means to control India and the roads leading to
these huge lands extending to the end ofthe continent. The British government was so sure ofIndia where the nationalities are different; religions are scattered, dissimilar languages, and conflicting interests. And this way the government was sure ofChina where; the Buddhism and the Confucianism, which is the most prominent in that country, both were not a threat for
they are dead religions focusing on the spiritual side and have no connection with the
living side therefore; it was far fetched to see a feeling ofpatriotism among people of
these two areas. And that is why the British government had no concern when it came
to these two countries, and it worked out long term plans to create division, ignorance,
poverty, and sometimes keep these countries in sickness. They were applying an old
Buddhist proverb (Let the patient crave his medicine even ifit tastes severely bitter).
Second: The Muslim Caliphs State:

What concerned the British government was the Muslim countries and they used to call
them; the Sick Man. Many treaties were signed and all were for the advantage ofthe
British government, and the outlook ofthe British Colonies’ Ministry is that the Man
will breathe his last in less than a century.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

Third: The Governments in the Persian States
The British government had secretly signed many treaties with the Persian government
and they set out spies and agents in it and resulted in bribery and corrupted
administration and the engagement ofits kings in corruption and clotted the body ofthis
country. Reasons for Britain’s fear ofthe Islamic countries

9. In spite ofplanting spies and agents in the Islamic countries, and despite the spreading
ofbribery and corrupted administration the British government was unconfident ofthe
results due to the following reasons:
a. The strength ofIslam in the souls ofits followers against all schemes the thing that
make Muslim Men different than men ofother religions.Due to the fact that the
Islamic features and characteristics are planted in the Muslim Man and the make
him stand steadfast

b. Islam as a religion:

Whereas Islam is a religion oflife and control, it is hard to tell the masters that
you are slaves. The arrogance ofsupremacy pushes the human being to superiority
no matter how weak or low he is. Therefore, the British government was unable to
forge the history ofIslam.

c. The awakening ofthe Islamic awareness

The British government feared that Muslims in their hearts will become aware;
the thing that if happens; will result in the failure ofall its plans aiming to control.
It is true that the Islamic country had reached a great deal ofweakness but the
existence of a centralized government which the people support and its aspiration is
supremacy, money and arms makes the people unsafe.

d. Apprehensiveness ofMuslim scholars

The government was extremely apprehensive ofMuslim scholars, because AIAzhar scholars, Iraq scholars and Persia scholars were the toughest barrier in facing
the ambitions ofthe British government; they were extremely ignorant about the
modem life principles. They made heaven, which the Koran had promised them of
their number one priority so they would not compromise their principles and the

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. people followed them and the sultan feared them.

How Britain deployed its spies and created its different parties among Muslims

10. The British government held many conferences to remove all reasons for fear
and to establish sufficient solutions for all these uneasy problems, but they have not
reached a good solution yet and all the reports that they received from their agents and
spies were disappointing as well as the results of all these conferences were not good.
One time they held a conference in the Ministry that was attended by representatives
from each ofBritain, France, and Russia. It was discussed at the highest level and the
attendees were diplomats and religious men. In this conference they mentioned ways to
rip Muslims apart and strip them oftheir belief, but the results were not at the required
level and(it is hard to pull the roots ofa tree that had grown to the east and to the west
ofthe Land, but man has to overcome difficulties at any cost)!
In 1710 A.D. the British Colonies Ministry sent its spies to each ofEgypt, Iraq, Tehran,
AI-Hijaz, and Estonia to gather information that will help tear apart Muslims and
dominate Muslim countries. The ministry had already provided them with sufficient
money, sufficient information, possible maps, names ofgovernors, scholars, tribes and
family chiefs.

Footnotes

! Taken with liberty from the autobiography ofHumfer

These spies started to learn the Turkish language and the language ofthe Arabs (The
language ofKoran) and the Persian language. Some ofthem pretended to be Muslims
and attended the Muslim mosques and met with men ofreligion to learn all the Islamic
rules, and they learned the holy Koran, the practice of ablution and prayer; they were
taught by Muslim scholars. After they stayed for a period oftwo years spying in the
Islamic countries they received orders from the Ministry to go back to London. There
were ten spies assigned with the espionage duty, but only six ofthem returned and as
for the other four, one ofthem became a Muslim and stayed in Egypt, one went to
Russia where he was originally from, the third died in the outskirts ofthe city ofBalad
near by Baghdad because of a disease spread all over the country, as for the fourth, his
whereabouts are unknown. The ministry had followed him until he got to Sanaa in
Yemen and his reports were sent regularly to the ministry for a period of a year but was
interrupted after that and the ministry has no information about him. The ministry
considered the loss offour out often a catastrophe because they precisely accounted for
each one ofthem.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

11. The ministry had met with the six spies and listened to their reports, evaluated them,
and advised them. After six months, the British Colonies’ Ministry sent the trained spy
Mr. Humfer to the city ofBaghdad in Iraq in order to creat~ disorder between the Sunni
and Shiites and find the weak point ofMuslims so he can penetrate his body to defuse
the unity ofIslam. Also, his mission in this trip was to identify the conflicts among
Muslims and create an atmosphere ofdisagreement, expiation, and mistrust among
them as well as make up different faiths and form fake colonial religions to enable the
colonizer to reach its objectives in creating division and spread disperse among
Muslims instead of eliminating Islam and Muslims religious beliefs. the orders given
by the British colonizer to its spies in the Islamic countries were in the following
fashion (spread fake and made up faiths and beliefs in Islamic regions within fully
considered, matured and organized plans where they preach after they evaluate upon
suitable, intellectual background among the different classes ofpeople. There should be
no rush…and should spread these beliefs and preach them, they should not be limited to
only popular areas, rather they should be spread among the four groups of Sunni in
order to create extreme differences and disputes among these groups hence each group
would claim that they represent the true Islam and the others are renegades and infidels
and must be killed)].

Footnotes:

] Humfer’s autobiography. And according to these orders, the spies started carefully to study and to get familiar with the social and political sites in the Islamic societies and their extreme trends; they
also started to create the necessary groups to achieve the objectives oftheir colonial masters. It is obvious that the colonizers didn’t do this first hand; yet to achieve their goals, they were looking for individuals who do not relish strength in faith and fear of God and possess different trends. The colonizer used to excessively offer these individuals financial and moral aids and urge them to establish the various groups. As an example to these, here we point to two groups that fit the subject we are discussing….

a. AI-Shaykhiyyah Group:

An extremist Shiite group which is active in Iraq, and was later called by the
name of(AI-Shaykhiyyah), founded by a person called Sheikh Ahmad AI-Ihsani
and his student Mr. Kazim AI-Rashti. This group started to praise the virtuous

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. Imams to the level ofGod and presented many overstated notions at this level, and
to pave the way for the other extremist group (Al-Wahabi) so they can direct
accusations and expiation at each other.

b. Al-Wahabi Group:

Next to Al- Shaykhiyyah, the colonizer created another extreme Sunni group
called (Al-Wahabiyyah). The British found in Muhammad ‘Abd-al-Wahab many
attributes such as the love ofglory, immorality, and extreme views so; they came to
realize that he is the right person to establish the group they wanted. Thus they
started following him step by step until they found the right opportunity; hence they
pointed out to him, the birth ofthe new faith. Afterwards, they ordered him to
concur with another well known agent ofthe seasoned British colonizer that is;
Su’ud Bin ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz, and they provided them with the required means to attract
followers. Within a given period offulfilling the duty assigned to them, they killed
Al-Hajjaj and everyone who wouldn’t accept their new faith whether he is Shiite or
Sunni, was destined to death and plundering, and everyone who thought ofvisiting
the holy tomb ofprofit Muhammad (God’s blessing and peace be upon him) and the
holy sites was treated as ifhe was (infidel) (polytheist).

12. Al-Wahabi principles are based on the expiation ofIslamic faiths and promoting
division among Muslims and eliminating the traces ofthe spiritual Islamic message.
Al-Hijaz is the homeland ofthis group, and recently the activities ofthis group have
increased; everyday they issue a book or an article attacking the Islamic sanctuaries.
The Su’ud family spends lots ofmoney in compliance with their masters’ orders to
prevent the unity ofMuslims, create division among them, expiate them, and to
stray each other from the right path. Both groups; Al-Wahabi and Al-Shaykhiyyah
are established on wrong views therefore they brought about disorder, blood
shedding, and killing of Muslims. Hence, Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab established his mission based on visions of(Ibn Timiah)and his intentions. The later was a fan of(Ibn Tawmart)
who claimed to be Al-Mihdi [CL: translates the Guide] in North Africa, and his
ideas dominated parts of Spain, Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco for two centuries; he
was nicknamed Mihdi Al-Muwahadin [CL: The guide ofthose who are united]
Then he worked together with Muhammad Su’ud and both their swords and the
swords oftheir followers trickled with blood, and wherever they went, blood was
flowing, and they called the Muslims infidels; they killed everyone who didn’t
support them and obeyed them. The Wahabis ordeal was big and truly strange to the
extent that the Muslim world up to date couldn’t cover up its damages.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

Second Topic:

AI-Wahabi Movement’s Missionary
.:. Najd in History:
•:. AI-Wahabi movement and it’s founder Muhammad’Abd-al-Wahab Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab’s trips before the missionary. His encounter with Muhammad Bin Su’ud in AI-Dar’iyyah

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

Najd in History

13. Najd means the elevated land; it is the name designated for the middle part ofthe Arabic
Peninsula which is the largest part ofthe middle ofthe island. When the Ottoman State emerged
on the political scene in the Arabic Peninsula in 1517, it became satisfied with the nominal
authority ofthis area, and the tribalism was in full swing in Najd; every tribe had its own state,
and every group had its own sheikhdom which; takes pride in its authority and praises its name.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

Every governor had his own possessions and had no ties to his neighbor, and the Ottoman policy
has been mobilized for that purpose. In the twelfth century of Hegira, disorder had dominated
Najd, division prevailed, the gap had widened, and emirates had multiplied; the family of
Mu’ammar in Al-‘Ayniyyah, the family ofSu’ud in Al-Dar’iyyah, and the Family of Dawwas in
Riyadh; Al-Ahsa’ was the emirate ofBani Khalid, Najdan the family ofHazal, Ha’il the family
of ‘Ali, Al-Qasyim and the Northern borders ofNajd the family ofHajaylan, and in Southern
Iraq the emirate was for the family of Shabib.

All ofthe families and the sheikhdoms were in a state ofinstability and confusion with
disturbance spread throughout. These groups had no identified political order or a civilization
that is worth mentioning, plus the ruling system was in a tribal forml
.
Furthermore; there were very little documentation for the history ofthe area by its own people;
‘Uthman Bin Bishir Al-Najdi stated that: (The origin ofNajd and its ancient and modem scholars
was not to the extent where they paid attention to the history oftheir land, who built it, what
happened in it, who came to it, and who left it; except for very little that was written by few of
their scholars) in addition he said: (Then I wanted to gather a collection offacts about the family
of Su’ud, their news and their stories, but was unable to find someone who would tell me true
information)2

As for the religious situation ofNajd; during the era ofTasam and Jiryis, they use to worship AlTiyl which are houses shaped like cubes looking like cells made of clay rise from 200 to 300
yards in height. Paganism was founded afterwards; the tribes ofTaghlib and Bakr Bin wa’il had
an idol called ( Dha Al-Ka’bayin) and Magianism grew out ofit and was joined by Bani Tamim
in the sixth century A.D. Then Christianity got about and became widespread among the tribes
ofTaghlib and Bakr bin Wa’il; also the religion ofAl-Sabi’ah which worships the stars and was
adopted by the tribes ofDayran ofBani Tamim, while the people ofNajd took up Islam, but after
the death ofprofit Muhammad (God’s blessing and peace be upon him) some tribes have
recanted and were engaged in a war that ended

Footnotes:

1 Husayn Khalaf Al-Shaykh Khaz’al, The biography of Sheikh Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, Dar
Al-Kitab Press, Beirut 1968 A.D.

2 The Scholar ‘Uthman Bin Bishr Al-Najdi, The Glory in the History ofNajd; part one, Al-Riyad
Library, Riyadh, page 4. With the victory ofMuslims. After Islam entered its dark ages; Najd became the breeding ground for myths and heresies and its scholars became divided between introverted and men who carried
Islam only by name. The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.

After the Ottoman nation engaged in wars in Eastern Europe and the defeat that followed; the
Arabic nation became under clear confusion and a state offorfeiture; consequently the control
over Najd and Hijaz which is owned by the Hashemite became nominal.
Al-Wahabi Movement and its Founder Muhammad ‘Abd-al-Wahab

14. The Wahabi Movement is ascribed to Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab Bin Sulayman
who traces back to Wahib Al-Tamimi. Sheikh Khaz’al traces back the ancestry ofMuhammad
Bin’Abd-al-Wahab Bin Sulayman Bin’Ali Bin Ahmad Bin Rashid Bin Yazid Bin Muhammad
Bin Yazid to the family ofMusharraf who belongs to Bani Tamim tribe which goes back in its
descent to ‘Adnan1.Whereas Mustafa Tawran states that; Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab is a
descent of a family from the Jews ofAI-Dunamah in Turkey. Al-Dunmah refers to the Jews who
declared their embracement ofIslam in an effort to insult Islam and to escape the pursuit by the
Ottoman sultans. Subsequently; Tawran confinns that Sulayman; the grandfather ofthe sheikh, is
(Shulman); he is Jew from the merchants ofthe city ofBurstah in Turkey, he had left it and
settled in Damascus, grew his beard, and wore the Muslim turban, but was thrown out for being
voodoo. Then he fled to Egypt and he faced by strong objection so; he left to Hijaz and settled in
Al-‘Ayniyyah where he got married and had child whom he called ‘Abd-al-Wahab and claimed
to be from the descent ofRabi’iyyah, and that he was born in Morocco. This has also been
supported by sheikh Rifat Salim Kabar in his book, the Jews ofAl-Dunmah and the Origin of
the Saudi Wahabis. Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab was born in Al-‘Ayniyyah in Najd in 1703 from a father who wiped out the faith of Imam Hanbal; he taught jurisprudence and Hadith at Al-‘Ayniyyah

mosque. Muhammad was taught in Al-Madinah by sheikh’Abdallah Bin Ibrahim Bin Sina’, and
became a student at sixteen years old under Sheikh Hassan Al-Tamimi in Al-Mu’tasim. He was a
fan ofIbn Timyah and received his education at the hand ofSheikh Hasan AI-Islambuli; Judge of
AI-Basra, and Sheikh Zayn-al-Din Al-Mughrabi and Sulayman Al-Kurdi, ‘Abd-al-Karim AlKurdi, and Sheikh ‘Ali Al-Daghistani. ‘Abd-al-Wahab got married about twenty times, the first time

Footnotes:

1Sheikh Khaz’aI, Biography ofSheikh Muhammad, Previous reference – page 42
2 Sheikh Khaz’al, previous reference – page 49, also scholar Al-Najdi, the Histori ofNajd, previous
reference – page 89
3 Turan, Dr. Mustafa, the Jews ofAl-Dunamah, Translation ofKamal Al-Khawjah, Cairo 1989 – page

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. In AI-‘Ayniyyah and also in Baghdad, she died immediately and he took a spouse the daughter of prince ‘Abdallah Bin Mu’ammar and she gave birth to six boys and six girls.
He died after he suffered from a disease that took his life shortly afterwards on June 2, 1792 and
was buried in AI-Dar’iyyah graveyard that was designated to Su’ud family and his grave is
known there till this day!. At the very beginning, Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab learned from many ofthe scholars of Mecca and AI-Madinah; his father ‘Abda-al-Wahab was a good scholar and used to insult him and warn people about him. His brother Sulayman bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab wrote a book to answer him; in his early days, he was fond ofreading about those who claim prophecy like;
Musaylamah, Sajah, AI-Aswad AI-‘Ansi, and Talihat AI-Asadi and such. He has four children;
‘Abdallah, Hasan, Husayn, and ‘Ali.

The supporter ofMuhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab and the one who spread his faith was
Muhammad bin Su’ud, after that his sons; ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz and Su’ud and then Su’ud bin ‘Abd-al-
,Aziz who humiliated Iraq and prevented Muslims from going to Hajj; thus Hajj was interrupted
in his time for years.

15. The origin ofthe Wahabi movement is that the Arabs, especially those masters ofthe demons said
that; a poor herdsman by the name of Sulayman had a dream that a flame emerged from him,
spread throughout the land, and started to bum everyone that had an encounter with it. He told of
his dream to someone who interpreted it as; a son of his will establish a strong land. So his dream
came true in the ideology ofMuhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab. Thus when Muhammad grew up, he
became respected [CL: The study has a typo that reads Muhtarifan instead ofMuhtaraman] by the
people of his town because ofthat dream which he didn’t know of. In the beginning, he secretly
revealed his faith and a group ofpeople followed him; then he traveled to Great Syria, but no one
there followed him so; he returned to the Land ofthe Arabs after he left it for three years, he came
to Najd and revealed this faith or (the Movement). Su’ud followed him and they both had strength
in each other; Su’ud strengthened his emirate through religion by following Muhammad bin ‘Abdai-Wahab in his faith, yet bin’Abd-al-Wahab promoted his missionary by means ofsword. With
Su’ud following him and becoming victorious through him, Su’ud became the ruling prince and
bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab the religious leader and their children thereafter took over the rank oftheir
predecessors.

After Su’ud became the ruler ofhis tribe, he conquered two tribes from Yemen and a large number
ofArab tribes became subjected to this faith and so did all the Arabs ofNajd; they picked the city
ofAI-Dar’iyyah to be the capital oftheir country which is situated in the south east ofAI-Basra.
Fifteen years later, the Su’ud emirate expanded; he had aspiration to grow, and used to take one ten
ofthe livestock, money, honor, even souls. He takes one ten from people by lottery so; he collected
enormous amounts ofmoney and his army exceeded hundred

Footnotes:

! Sheikh Khaz’al, previous reference – page 333, The History ofNajd, previous reference – page 88
IS The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 22- and twenty thousand fighters. Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab started to emerge in the year of 1143 ofHegira and became famous after he turned fifty where he revealed the false faith in Najd and its dependant territories; starting offwith the support ofMuhammad bin Su’ud, prince ofAlDar’iyyah he prompted its people to follow him so they did. Many Arabs obeyed him, until he became strong and the desert feared him. He used to tell them: I am calling upon you to unite and leave polytheism.

Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, according to the “History ofNajd” book by Mahmud Shukri AI-Alusi; grew
up in the town ofAl-‘Ayniyyah, the land ofNajd, he read religion to his father in accordance with
the school of Ahmad bin Hanbal, and ever since he was a little child; he spoke words which
Muslims didn’t know and furthermore he was denying them what they have agreed to do. Yet no
one helped him in that respect so; he traveled from AI-‘Ayniyyah to Mecca, then to AI-Medina
where he learned from sheikh ‘Abdallah bin Ibrahim bin Sayf, and he emphasized AI-Tankir [CL:
That is to deny something be it the profit or practices in Islam etc…] over appealing to the profit
Muhammad (God’s blessing and peace be upon him) by his tomb.

Later on he moved to Najd then to Basra; when he arrived in Basra, he stayed there for a period oftime where he learned from Sheikh Muhammad AI-Majmu’i, and lied to its people about many things so they threw him out.

He fled there, and after many moves he arrived in a town called Huraymulah in Najd, the town
where his father came from; he stayed with him and read to him and showed disapproval of
Muslim beliefs in Najd; his father reprimanded him but Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab wouldn’t stop until
they got into a big dispute. Furthermore, he engaged into many arguments with the Muslims of
Huraymulah that lasted for two years until his father passed away in 1153 ofHegira and he became
bold enough to bring out his beliefs and disapprove ofwhat Muslim have concurred. The scum of
people have joined him until the people ofthe town became fed up with his articles and were
determined to kill him so; he moved from Huraymulah to Al-‘Ayniyyah which was governed by
‘Uthman bin Ahmad bin Mu’ammar.

Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab allured him ofbecoming the king of Najd so; ‘Uthman helped him and he told the people ofhis disapproval ofMuslims and was followed by few ofthe people ofAl-‘Ayniyyah. He demolished the dome ofZayd bin AI-Khattab by AI-Jubaylah which made him important and his news reached Sulayman bin Muhammad bin ‘Aziz AI-Hamidi owner ofAI-Ihsa’, as well as Alqatif and its dependant territories so; Sulayman sent a letter to ‘Uthman ordering him to kill bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab and warning him ofviolating his order. ‘Uthman didn’t care and violated the order so, Sulayman ordered him to leave his kingdom, bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab told him then: ifyou support me you will rule Najd, but Sulayman didn’t listen to him therefore; he left to AI-Dar’iyyah in 1160 ofHegira (which is the land of Musaylimah the Liar) and its ruler at the time was; Muhammad bin Su’ud, from the tribe of’Anayzah. He begged him and allured him ofruling the land ofNajd so he followed him and supported him in killing Muslims.

Thus he wrote to the people ofNajd, their Rulers, and their judges requesting their allegiance. Few ofthem submitted to him and few didn’t pay him attention so; he ordered the people ofAI-Dar’iyyah to fight, so they complied and fought with him the people ofNajd and. AIhsa’ many times, until some ofthem submitted to him willingly or unwillingly, and the emirate of Najd became the property ofthe family ofSu’ud helplessly and by force.

Sheikh Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab was known among his relatives by his shrewdness and
brightness and portrayed as active, polite and extremely hard working. He used to give his
followers everything he had; he was taught

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. By great teachers, wise men, and scholars and he became the herald ofthis nation. He conformed to A1- Hanafiyyah method, mimicking Imam Aba Hanifah in the fundamentals, but following his personal views when it comes to ramifications. Afterwards he went on giving legal opinions independently based on his own discretion, and he called people upon this. Such these discretions are considered all Muslim denominations, Jews, Christians, and all types ofpeople are infidels, polytheists, and same as idol worshipers; his proof ofthat is that the glorification and reverence ofMuslims for profit Muhammad’s tomb (God’s blessing and peace be upon him), his holy garden, and the tombs ofthe virtuous, is nothing but worshiping idols. That is the same for the case ofChristians and Jews who set up statues ofMusa and Christ (Peace and prayer be upon him) in their churches and temples. However; devotion to God is to kneel to the very incumbent of existence and worship him, might and majesty belongs to him, and have no partners with him.

A crowd of his own tribe and the public followed him in that, and he become to have circles that have
voice and can come to results. Yet he is still threatening to demolish the dome ofGod’s messenger
Muhammad (God’s blessing and peace be upon him) and all holy tombs. He is putting before his eyes
that once he takes over the power, he will make them even with ground and abolish any trace to them.
Although this movement or faith emerged and spread during the era ofMuhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab in the eighteenth century; yet the very first seed was since the days ofAhmad bin Tamimah in the seventeenth century and his student, bin Maytham AI-Jawziyyah.

Muhammad Bin ‘Abd-AI-Wahab’s Trips Before The Missionary 16. Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab’s trip to Mecca was for acquiring education and Hajj, then he went to AI-Medina AI-Munawwarah where he learned religion from narrator; AI-Sayyd Hayat AISundi and the scholar AI-Majdi ‘Abdallah bin Ibrahim Al Sayifin 1723 A.D. Then he returned to his home town afterwards and started to deny openly the acts of obsession with the profit, the guardians, and the holy men, and considered that polytheism. He was opposed with sarcasm for saying that which made him leave AI-‘Ayniyyah in 1724 A.D. passing thru AI-Ihsa and stayed with sheikh ‘Abdallah bin Muhammad AI-Shafi’i AI-Ihsa’i, then he entered Iraq and went to Basra and stayed at the school of sheikh Muhammad bin AI-Majmu’i located in the famous district ofAI-Mujamma’a in Basra. Because
of his missionary, the people ofAI-Basra started to harass him so he left it walking on foot, and almost died ofheat and tiresome. He arrived at AI-Zubayr and returned to his family in Huraymulah after his family moved to it as a result oftheir dispute with its prince.

Then Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab left to Baghdad and stayed in AI-Wazir mosque (AI-Malik bin
Husayn). He worked in teaching theology to Sheikh ‘Abd-al-Karim AI-Kurdi AI-Shafi’i and Sheikh
Sabghatallah AI-Haydari. He was elected Imam to one ofthe mosques in Baghdad, and there he met
sheikh ‘Abd-al-Rahman AI-Suwaydi.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. One ofBaghdad’s senior scholars. He married a rich woman there, after she died, he inherited lots money from her and stayed in Baghdad three years. After his wife’s death, Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab left to Kurdistan and stayed for one year there; he moved from there to Iran and lived in Al-‘Abbasi School in Asfahan and was educated by Mirza Khan AI-Asfahani. He stayed for a year then moved to Tehran accompanied by his student from Baghdad; ‘Ali AI-Ghazar.

Afterwards he moved to Turkey teaching people the faith ofHanbal although their faith was Hanafi.
He left there and returned to Syria where he stayed six months in Aleppo studying Arabic language;
then he moved to Damascus where the school ofHanbali teachings is and the home of Timiyyah and
AI-Jawziyyah. There he condemned acts of Sufis, Darawish, and Naqshbandies, and their glorifying to the tomb oftheir sheikh; Muhi-al-Din bin’Arabi. Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab left Damascus heading to Jerusalem which he then left to Cairo and lived in AI-Azhar and was the student of Sheikh Muhammad Zain-al-Din, he stayed there for two years, and returned to his family in 1738 A.D. This trip enabled him to learn about the common people, and what they do; it also gave him abundant knowledge ofthe Muslim schools offaith until he announced his calling and was opposed by his father.

He remained isolated for two years until the death ofhis father late 1739 A.D. He was appointed a judge after his father, but because of his calling, the people ofthe town attempted to assassin him so; he escaped to Al-‘Ayniyyah and was received by its prince; he married AI-Jawharh bint ‘Abdallah bin AI-Mu’ammar from the prince and started his calling from there. He worked in teaching the tribes and together with the prince, they demolished the dome ofthe tomb ofZain bin AI-Kattab, removed the embellishments, and threw stones at a prostitute.

In addition to that, he wrote the book (Al-Tawhid) which made the prince ofAI-Hisa order the prince of Al-‘Ayniyyah to throw him out so; he left to AI-Dar’iyyah in the year 1745 A.D.l
His Encounter with Muhammad Bin Su’ud in AI-Dar’iyyah 17. After leaving Al-‘Ayniyyah, Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab headed to AI-Dar’iyyah. He arrived there in the year 1745 A.D. There he met Muhammad bin Su’ud who was nicknamed AlSheikh, but he was given the title Prince and the name sheikh was restricted to men ofreligion. The first meeting between the prince and the sheikh was in the home of Sheikh Ahmad bin Suwaylim Al- ‘Arrifi, they both agreed to support each other and to give the religious power to Muhammad bin ‘AbdaI-Wahab while the family ofSu’ud will be in charge ofthe secular power (government).

They agreed and shook hands saying (Blood for blood and destruction for destruction)2
For the close relation between the Family ofSu’ud and AI-Wahabi Movement, we will have a brief
introduction to Muhammad bin Su’ud.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 25-

Footnotes:

I Cited with liberty from the book ofSheikh Khaz’al and Sheikh Al-Najdi, reference previously mentioned.

2 Sheikh Khaz’al, reference previously mentioned, page 159 -160, also Al-‘Allamah Al-Najdi is a previous
reference, page 49.18 Muhammad bin Su’ud was born in Al-Dar’iyyah in 1687 AD. He is Muhammad bin Su’ud bin Miqrin bin Markhan bin Ibrahim bin Musa bin Rabi’ah bin Mani’. His ancestors trace back to the tribe of ‘Anzah, one ofthe Arabic tribes. Books which support the family ofSu’ud, agree that l ; he took the sheikdom ofAl-Dar’iyyah for forty years, he spent half ofthem, before the arrival ofthe Sheik, and married one ofthe sheikh’s daughters and had four boys; Su’ud and Faysal were killed in his life time, whereas ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz and ‘Abdallah ere left. He died while he was in AI-Dar’iyyah and was buried there in the year 1765 AD.

As for the books that do not support his calling; they mention something different. YusifHatatah states that (Bin Su’ud is not related to one ofthe famous Arabic homes, neither pre Islamic times, nor during Islamic timesY. Yet ‘Abd-al-Wahab Al-Shammari says (Muhammad Bin Su’ud is ofa Jewish descent also, and traces back to the Jewish Mardakhai bin Ibrahim bin Mushi; who was a merchant in AlBasra, he was approached by a group from the tribe of’Anza, and Al-Masalikh subdivision to buy from him; he claimed to be one ofthem and was extremely generous with them and traveled with them to Najd and his name became Markhan bin Ibrahim bin Musa, men gathered around him because of his money and wealth?

Yet Nasir Al-Su’ud; he says in his book (The History ofthe Su’ud Family) that the Saudi ambassador
in Cairo, ‘Abdallah bin Ibrahim Al-Mufaddal, had paid Muhammad Al-Tamimi thirty five thousand
Jinee in the year 1943 AD. to place a fake tree forthe family ofSu’ud and the family of ‘Abd-alWahab and merge them together in one tree claiming that they are from the origin ofprofit
Muhammad (God’s blessing and peace be upon him). The Saudis have rewarded him by appointing
him a manager for all Saudi libraries 4. Then Al-Shammari goes back to mention that the ancestors of the family ofSu’ud is Jewish because; the name Muhammad bin Su’ud bin Muqrin bin Makun bin
Mardakhai bin Ibrahim bin Mushi, is not Arabic and Arabs do not use names such as (Mardakhai),
(Mushi or Makwan) which were changed later to (Markhan, Musa, and Muqrin).

Footnotes:

I Same previous reference, page 50.
2 YusifKamil Hatatah, a book by the name; Al-Mas’alah Al-Hijaziyyah [CL: translates; Al-Hijaz Affair]

3 Al-Shammari, Al-Wahabi Movement, preiously mentioned reference, page 21.

4 Al-Sa’id Nasir, The History ofthe Su’ud Family, Part 1, page 17.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 26-19.

Third Topic:

Invasions and the Wahabi connections; and the views ofwriters and historians

.:. The Wahabi invasions in Najd.
•:. The Wahabis and AI-Hijaz.
•:. AI-Wahabi movement and Iraq.
•:. The Wahabi – British relations.
•:. Different views ofthe Wahabi Movement
.:. Conclusion
The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 27-

The Wahabi Invasions in Najd.

18. Sheikh Khaz’al states in his book (Bin Su’ud and Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab were in full agreement in all
oftheir behaviors as ifthey were one personality with two functions in life. Thus the prince never took an important decision or started a project without the approval ofthe Sheikh)l.
After two years of his stay in Al-Dar’iyyah, Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab ordered its people to fight other tribes and call upon them to his ideology. His first invasion was on Al-‘Arab [CL: The Bedouins]; they killed them and took their money. In 1746 and 1755 the people ofHuraymulah lead by their judge Sheikh Sulayman, brother ofMuhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, threw out the prince ofthe Su’ud family, consequently; ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz bin Su’ud along with 800 fighters marched towards Huraymulah, killed its people and took possession ofit. In 1757 A.D. ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz prepared an army in which he seized (Manfluhah) and wrecked its dam (Al-Rasha) and the fighting went on between them until’Abd-al- ‘Aziz killed its chiefs, conquered it in 1761, and demolished its homes and domes. In 1747 the emirate ofthe Su’ud family directed an army which conquered Shadiq, seized its livestock, and killed many of its people. In 1756 Ashiqar was seized and conquered after few invasions. In 1761, they invaded AlSadir in Northern Najd. The Su’ud Family forces killed people, burnt houses, seized livestock and money during their invasions.

In Muhammad bin Su’ud’s era, his army engaged in wars and invaded the areas ofRiyadh, Najdan,
and Ihsa’ in which; Su’ud and Faysal the sons ofthe Prince were killed upon the attack by Daham bin
Daras, owner ofRiyadh in 1747 and Riyadh was subjugated to the rule ofthe Su’ud family following
many battles in 1764. In 1765 Prince Muhammad bin Su’ud died leaving ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz behind; who
seized AI-Zulfa in 1780 A.D. and Al-Mujamma’a, that was famous for its hostility towards the Wahabi Movement, in 1779 A.D. And with that, the whole region was conquered; with the leadership of Su’ud bin Muhammad. In the year 1774 A.D. Al-Dulm was seized and its owner Zayd bin Zamil and its people were killed. In 1782 A.D. Al-‘Aqim was seized, and 1785 A.D. ‘Antarah was seized, and over there Prince Su’ud bin’Abd-al-‘Aziz was acknowledged as crown prince, and Muhammad bin’AbdaI-Wahab secluded himselffrom politics, stayed put at home, and referred matters to Prince ‘Abd-al- ‘Aziz bin Su’ud.

In 1790 A.D., AI-Ihsa’ was completely conquered and the Su’ud family reigned over Najd; and stirred its direction to Hijaz where Mecca, Medina, Jedda, Al-Ta’if, and Yanbu’ are; and the reign there was for the Nobles 27 of 56 189The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. – 28- ! Sheikh Khaz’al, previously mentioned reference, page 265. 21 of Mecca, The Hashemite who had absolute power under nominal rule ofthe Ottoman State!. The Wahabis and AI-Hijaz 19. AI-Hijaz is the dividing mountains between the high Najd and the low coast line ofthe Red Sea; its most popular cities are Mecca, Medina, Al-Ta’if, and Yanbu’. It was successively ruled by the Nobles of Mecca, but when Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab declared his missionary in Najd; the people ofAI-Hijaz started to follow the course ofthat missionary. After the Sheikh [CL: That is Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab] stopped in AI-Dar’iyyah and began to fight his opponents and destroy domes, and the practices that are related to this missionary; the nobles ofMecca joined his opposition and declared their war against the missionary, and decided to do away with it.

The first one to confront the Wahabi Movement was the Noble Mas’ud bin Sa’id who submitted reports to the Sublime Port [CL: Ottoman authority] explaining the threat ofthe missionary to the Islamic Caliphate in Turkey; he gained the blessing from the Sublime Port in which the people ofNajd were prohibited from making the pilgrimage and entering Mecca. After his death, his brother (Musa’id) took over the matters ofMecca and kept his brother’s position until he died leaving behind, ‘Abdallah bin Sa’id; who ruled for few days, and his brother (Ahmad) took over. His nephews; the family ofMusa’id, arouse against him and forced him out. The emirate was turned over to Surur bin Musa’id who permitted the Wahabis to fulfill the religious obligation ofpilgrimage after they pay levy just like foreigners. When the power was turned over to Noble Ghalib; he deployed ten thousand fighters from Arabs, Turks, Egyptians, and Moroccans; with the leadership of his brother ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz and the nobles ofMecca he attacked Najd however; they were faced with strong resistance and noble Ghalib was forced to enter into peace agreement.

After long battles, the Su’ud family with the leadership of ‘Uthman AI-Mudaiqi were able to conquer
Al-Ta’if, and Prince Ghalib was forced to leave it in 1803 A.D., two hundred men ofits people were
killed, its wealth and weapons were seized, and ‘Uthman was appointed its prince 2

The Su’ud family then was able to rein Mecca after it was turned over by noble’Abd-al-Mu’in in
exchange for him continuing to be its prince. In the year 1804 A.D., Medina surrendered after the
forces ofthe Su’ud family have laid a strong and strict siege, imposed tax upon its people, seized the
treasures located in the grave ofprofit Muhammad (God’s blessing and peace be upon him), and tried to wreck the dome ofthe profit’s grave but they were faced with strong resistance so they left it 3.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 29-

Footnotes:

1 Cited and summarized with liberty from the book ofThe Biography of Sheikh Muhammad bin ‘Abd alWahab, and the books ofThe History ofNajd and The History ofthe Su’ud Family.

2 Sheikh Khaz’al, previously mentioned reference, page 375.

3 Al-Sammari, The Wahabi Movement, previously mentioned reference, page 75.22

Thus were the Wahabis able to control Al-Hijaz and make its people believe in the missionary
Furthermore; they were able to impose the ambitious’Abd-al-‘Aziz bin ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz so he became
wealthy and began to communicate with the kings and princes ofthe Arabic and Islamic countries,
explain the objectives ofthe missionary and its substance l and call upon them to accept it.
The Ottoman State was skeptical about the movement and saw a dangerous threat to setting forth its power on the Arabic countries and the establishing ofthe emirates which will succeed it. Therefore; it authorized Muhammad’Ali, the governor ofEgypt, to stifle it, and appointed him governor ofAlHijaz in addition to Egypt. Muhammad’Ali sent a military expedition yet it came to nothing so; he sent another expedition lead by his son; Ibrahim Pasha who gained victory over the Su’ud family and inflicted enormous losses upon them, seized Al-Hijaz, destroyed Al-Dar’iyyah which is the center of the Wahabi leadership, and arrested ‘Abdallah bin Su’ud and sent him to Astana where he was executed.

After that; Turki bin ‘Abdallah bin Muhammad bin Su’ud came into sight in the year 1888. He was
able to bring back the authority over Najd. He started actively uniting his state and spreading his
missionary; he was able to stretch out his rule to reach Al-Ihsa’, assumed AI-Riyadh his capital, and
began communicating with countries in the East and the West to call upon them to accept his
missionary. He described himself as guardian of all Muslims and was called Imam. His son Faysal
succeeded him, he was more eager which scared the Ottomans. Thus; they sent an expedition during Muhammad ‘Ali’s time and was destined to make triumph over Faysal who managed to escape and recaptured his power over Najd, and edges ofAl-Hijaz and ‘Asir in 1260 ofHegira; He forced the princes ofMasqat, Bahrain, and the coasts ofthe Arab Gulfto pay annual levy . After his death, his son ‘Abd-al-Rahman succeeded him in 1288 ofHegira, where the fighting among the Su’ud family over the reign had started which helped the coming out ofthe prince of Shamar; Muhammad bin ‘AbdaI-Rashid. He came to be ofwidespread authority covered Najd, Al-Ihsa’ up to the Arab Gulf east, and the mountains ofHawran, Wadi Al-Dawasir, and Wadi Al-Rumman West. He made Ha’il the center of his state; and was caught in many big conflicts with the Su’ud family, conquered AI-Riyadh, defeated the Wahabis, and forced ‘Abd-al-Rahman to escape and go to the Kuwaiti sheikhs.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 30-

In the year 1900 A.D. ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz bin ‘Abd-al-Rahman, managed to attack AI-Rashid family and
reclaimed AI-Riyadh, the conflict between them lasted for twenty years, where the Ottoman
government supported the Rashid family which made the Su’ud family get in touch with the British
and sign a treaty with them in 1914 A.D. thus England acknowledged the emirate ofthe Su’ud family
over Najd, Al-Ihsa’, Al-Qatif, and AI-Jabal; and promised to help them against any attacks provided
that, they do not deal with anyone else but them also; they shall not interfere in the affairs ofKuwait
and the Gulf States which; were under the protection ofBritain. Also Britain dedicated a financial aid
that amounts to forty thousand golden sterling pounds

Footnotes:
1 Darwazah, Muhammad ‘Izzah, The Birth ofthe Modem Arabic Movement. The Modem LibraryBeirut 1949 A.D., page 70. 23 and through this alliance; the Sa’ud family was able to remove the emirate ofAI-Rashid family and subjugate them to the authority ofthe family ofSa’ud Al-WahabP.

After that, a conflict erupted between the Nobles ofMecca and the Su’ud family and the reason was
that SharifHusayn bin ‘Ali; noble ofMecca, had signed with Britain his famous agreement in which
he teamed up with the British and declared a revolution against the Ottoman State and became king in the year 1916 and considered Najd included in his area ofreign. ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz refused that, and the
conflict between them began with’Abdul-‘Aziz coming out victorious when he attached Al-Ta’if and
seized it in 1924 A.D. then he proceeded to Mecca then Rabi’ and Medina and seized them.
Thereupon; SharifHusayn pulled back to Jeddah where he transferred the monarchy to his son ‘Ali
who receded for his inability so; it was ascended by ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz and Al-‘Asir in 1930 where he
negotiated with the British and signed an agreement with them in which they acknowledged his reign over Najd and Hijaz. In the year 1932 A.D. and his kingdom was called; (The Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia). The Wahabi Movement and Iraq 20.

The power in Southern Iraq was in the hand ofthe Shabib family and the princes ofAlMuttafaq at that time and Thawini bin ‘Abdalah Al-Mutawlli was ruling Al-Muttafaq, and carried out
many expeditions over Al-Qasim gaining many victories. He also launched an attack on AI-Dar’iyyah, but before he got to it, the prince ofSu’ud took them by surprise and marched an army to meet Thawini and his tribes, a fight erupted among them ended with the defeat ofThawini’s army and his forces, leaving plunder and money and heading towards Safwan where he was chased by the army of Su’ud whom he had defeated and returned victorious to Al-Dar’iyyah. In 1789 A.D. Thawini returned with another expedition on Al-Qasim, and with the direction and the support ofthe Ottoman State in 179 A.D. Similar to that, the Su’ud family prepared three armies; entrusted the first one to Muhammad bin Mu’ayqil which camped in the village ofAl-Ma’ Al-Ma’rufin Al-Ta’iff, the other one was under 30 of 56192 .

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 31- the command ofImishari bin Su’ud which camped in AI-Ihsa’, and the third one lead by prince Su’ud, planned to be a cover for the other two armies. Met after the arrival ofThawini in AI-Ihsa’, and Hasan bin Imsahri assumed the general command, and was able to intercept Thawini’s forces who was killed in his tent, in the hands of a slave who was authorized by prince Su’ud in the year 1797; the thing which prompted the army’s anger, destroyed it, and helped the Su’ud family to defeat them, kill them, and chase them until they arrived at The Kuwaiti Sheikhdom.

In retaliation for the attack ofAI-Muttafaq tribes; the Su’ud family, the Wababis, set out an expedition on Iraq led by Su’ud. He penetrated the Iraqi border until he went deeply into Suq AI-Shuyukh, killed its people, and violated its sanctuaries which made its escape
I Darwazah, previously mentioned reference, page 7124 and they died drowning in the Euphrates river in the year 1798 A.D. He left it afterwards to go to Samawah, attacked the tribes of Shammar, tribes ofAI-Zafir, the family ofBa’iyj and Zaqarit, killed the chief of Shammar (Matlaq), and seized the money and the prizes I.

In the year 18 01 A.D. Prince Su’ud attacked Iraq’s Southern border and proceeded into the Middle
Euphrates, (Shattatah Tribes) in ‘Ayn AI-Tamr in Karbala’ and camped out there; he entered the city climbing up its walls in March 23, 1802. There was no army in it so; its people rushed to resist them, but they were not able to face such barbaric attacks, many ofthem were killed and the Su’ud forces took hold oftheir money goods, and looted everything inside the dome ofImam AI-Husayn’s (peace be upon him) tomb from valuable statues and precious gems. Furthermore; they took the monument located on the bed ofthe Imam, sabotaged the bed and ruined it 2

The forces ofthe Wahabi family of Su’ud carried out killing, looting, and destroying all Shiite sights in
Karbala’3. Darwazah stated that the forces ofthe Su’ud family attacked all shrines glorified by the Shiite in Iraq; such as the toms of ‘Ali and Husayn (peace be upon them) and others. They destroyed them, and looted their relics, alleging that these shrines; are violations with all their embellishments, the celebrations that take place on their grounds, sacrifices that are offered to them and the prayers and appeals which are cited for them. Furthermore; these forces have murdered all Shiite who opposed them4.

In the beginning ofthe seventeenth century, the Wahabis attacked convoys ofpilgrims from the tribes of (AI-Khaza’il) ofthe people ofIraq near Najd. The threat ofthe Wahabis increased and they raided the town of(‘Annah) in the year 1800 A.D., they killed its people, and looted their wealth. Also; they raided the village of(Kabisah) but its people resisted them with all their powerS.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 32- In the year 1810 A.D. a Gang ofWahabis led by ‘Abdallah bin Mas’ud reached a place near by Baghdad and proceeded robbing people and killing them. As a result of all these atrocities and others, aman from Northern Iraq by the name of’Uthman AI-Kurdi, traveled to AI-Dar’iyyah and stayed there claiming that he is seeking ! Sheikh Khaz’al, previously mentioned reference, page 386 2AI-Wa’ili, ‘Uthman bin Sanad AI-Wa’ili AI-Basa ri, Study ofthe Su’ud family, Dar AI-Hikmah press/ Baghdad, 1991 A.D.

3 AI-Khafni ‘Abd-al-Mun’im, Encyclopedia ofDifference, Groups, schools, and Islamic Movements,
second edition, Madbuli N. book store, Egypt 1999 A.D., page 681

4 Darwazah, The Birth ofThe Modem Arabic Movement, previously mentioned reference, page 71.

5 AI-Shammari, The Wahabi Movement, previously mentioned reference, page 70.25
education and religion killed prince’Abd-al-Amir bin Su’ud in AI-Ta’ifmosque, which is known in
AI-Dar’iyyah; in October 3,1803 A.D. As a revenge for his family, Su’ud was inaugurated their
prince!.

Himli comments by saying:”The new ideology found very little popularity in Iraq; the alleged Wahabi armies were received just like deserters and thieves because; the tribes ofIraq, Sunni and Shiite, were not able to change their faith with one paved by fire and invasion oflivestock)2.
He adds about the invasion ofKarbala’ (The rough Wahabis have worked up their way to the holy
shrines and started to destroy them…. and on top ofthese acts, they killed about fifty people near the shrine and 500 others outside the shrine in AI-Sahn… They mercilessly killed everyone they
encountered and robbed every house)3.

The British-Wahabi Relation

21. Humfer mentioned in his biography his relation with Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab when he
met him in AI-Basra, and how he befriended him and their relationship became very strong to the
extent that Humfer was able to stir ‘Abd-al-Wahab in the way that serves the British intelligence
without him knowing. In Isfahan, ‘Abd-al-Wahab was approached to fulfill a British plan provided that Britain will protect him, provide him with money and arms, and to give him a small emirate in the outskirts ofNajd under the following conditions: a. Expiation ofMuslims and justify killing them and robbing their money.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 33-

b. Demolish the Kaaba and the tombs ofthe pioneer Muslims, consider them idols, and
disrespect the Profit and the Caliphates.
Humfer listed the complete details which led him to this result since its beginning in 1710 A.D. when
Britain delegated him to collect information for bracing the ways to break Muslims and control their
land in Turkey, Iraq, Egypt, Iran, and AI-Hijaz. He called himselfMuhammad and learned Persian,
Turkish, and Arabic languages in London; until he reached Turkey and stayed in a mosque for the
purpose oflearning. He mastered the Turkish and Arabic languages and learned Islamic science for
two years; then he moved to Basra and worked as a carpenter claiming to be from Azerbaijan. People believed him because ofhis looks and his Turkish language.

He met Bin I Same previous reference, page 722 Loncaric, Mr Steven Homily, Four Centuries ofIraq’s Modern History, Translated by Ja’far AlKhayyat, third edition, Baghdad 1963 A.D., page 2113 Same previous reference, page 265.26 ‘Abd-al-Wahab there, the ambitious young man irritable and resentful ofthe Turkish rule. Humfer says that: (The ambitious young man Muhammad, used to think ofhimself as wise as the Koran and Sunna, and stipulated the views ofthe scholars, not just the scholars ofhis own time and the four Islamic schools ofthought yet; the views ofAbi Bakr and ‘Vmar [CL: Muslim Caliphates] too, as he understood the Koran in a way different from them, and he used to say: “I am leaving you with the Koran and the Sunna and didn’t say, I am leaving you with Koran, Sunna, AI-Sahaba [CL: the companions ofthe profit] and the schools ofthought”

Humfer found his long sought goal in Muhammad who used to look down upon the Caliphates and
Imams such as Abi Hanifah, and said: (I am more discerning than Abi Hanifah). This Spy mentions
that ‘Abd-al-Wahab started to explain Koran in light ofthe views they present to him, not according to the understanding ofthe profit’s companions and the sheikhdoms, and this is where he became under control, poison his thoughts, cause him to fall into mistakes, and commit sins. He started permitting himself what God had prohibited him from doing. Afterwards; ‘Abd-al-Wahab was approached to work for the interest ofBritain, and he agreed; and they gave him their big plan to destroy Islam.

Following that; ‘Abd-al-Wahab went to see his family along with Humfer whom he claimed to be a
slave that he bought from the market; he stayed with him for two years during which the plan to
emerge the missionary was concluded. Humfer had gathered the men around him, gave them arms and money, and years after according to Humfer, the British ministry was able to bring Muhammad bin.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 34- Su’ud to ‘Abd-al-Wahab’s side and together they assumed Al-Dar’iyyah, the capital ofthe new religion!. 22. The relationship between the Wahabis and Britain didn’t end after Humfer (or Muhammad), as he called himself, completed his mission. Thus Britain worked on emerging the so called Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, and arranged for his meeting with Muhammad bin Su’ud to destroy the Arabic Islamic State, and for the sake ofthe British interests; the British! Wahabi relations lasted from the eighteenth century till this date. In the early twentieth century, the British began developing these relationships in a form oftreaties, and to fulfill their plans; the Indian government appointed a Jewish British officer by the name (David Shakespeare) and sent him to Riyadh, upon the breakout ofthe First World War, to represent the British interests. This British officer led one ofthe Wahabi invasions in 1915 A.D. with ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz bin Su’ud to seize Ha’il along with five thousand individuals who started out from Kuwait to kill the family ofRashid who was against Britain; the family of Shammar was able to defeat them and kill (Shakespeare)2.

Thus the leadership was tended to (Johan Philippi) to coordinate between the Wahabis and Britain, and due to the fact, he changed his name to (Muhammad Philippi) and changed later to Hajj (‘Abdallah Philippi), he grew his beard, gave a monthly salary equal to 500 sterling pounds to ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz and to his father ‘Abd-al-Rahman

Footnotes:

! Summarized with liberty from Humfer’s autobiography, page 31-49.
2J.D. Discove, Kuwait and its Neighbors, translated by Jasim Al-Mubarak, first edition, part one, Kuwait, 1964 A.D., page 146. 27 and 25 sterling pounds to each ofhis brothers. Also; he brought 30,000 rifles with their ammunition and formed a religious army that abide by the image ofthe sheikhs completely, and was called (the Brotherhood Army) their distinctive mark is a (turban) over the head and their motto is (The smell of Paradise is approaching, who wants to be first?)! .
Philippi led the first meeting between Bracey Cocas, the British envoy to the Arab Gulf, and’Abd-al-
‘Aziz bin Su’ud in Al-Qasir Camp in 1915; by virtue ofwhich he granted ‘Abd-a1-‘Aziz the medal of
the British Sultanate for his service to Britain, Bracey Cocas, in that meeting, called on the problem of the Palestinians and the Jews and asked for ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz’s help by giving the Palestinian land to the Jews as a collateral for the endurance ofhis power, hence he said: (I think this is a guarantee for your endurance as it is in the interest ofBritain that the Jews have a homeland and existence, and Britain’s interests are, by all means, in your interest) ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz replied: (Yes; ifmy acknowledgementmeans so much to you, I acknowledge thousand times granting a homeland to the Jews in Palestine or other than Palestine)2 Various views in the Wahabi Movement 23.

Historians and writers who have discussed the Wahabi movement and the History ofthe Su’ud
family have differed in their views, some ofthem consider it a corrective movement, some have ranked. The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 35- it among the destructive religious movements that are heresiarch extreme, some considered it a foreign movement that has slipped in to destroy Islam by means ofthe Jews, Britain, the western, and America, others considered it a religious movement at the beginning, but has been made for the purpose ofthe Su’ud family that is eager to control the Arabic Peninsula in Najd and AL-Hijaz. I deemed it appropriate to list most ofthe views I have read:

In that respect, Darwazah stated that: (This movement ia ascribed to a scholar from Najd bt the name of Sheikh Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, originally from a town by the name of’Ayniyyah in Najd.

He was educated by AI-Hanbali school ofIslamic thought. He was in Iraq and other Arabic countries
and witnessed what the Arab Muslims were up to from heresies, religiously and morally forbidden
acts, and bad habits which contradict Islam. He began to disapprove that and condemn that, and to call upon them to return to Islam and its attributes in the book ofGod and his Profit)3.
Another view states that (During the days of Sultan Salim, injustice grew on the hands of every wicked giant, and so did the mighty power of’Abd-al-‘Aziz bin Sa’ud; he made roads scary, by filling them with bombs, and soldiers calling for the heresy ofMuhammad ! Nasar AI-Sah’id, the history Sa’ud, previously mentioned reference, part 1 page 58-59 2 Same previous reference, page 156-159
3Darwazah, the Birth ofthe Modem Religious Movement, previous reference page 70 28.

Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab flaring up fires every where there is population and structure and calling everyone who believed in one God and spent his day and night praying; infidel. He permitted shedding blood of Muslims and called them by the names which are attributed to infidels)!
As for Father Karmaly he says ofthe Wahabi calling that (they are Sunnis from Ahmad bin Hanbal’s
school ofthought, or AI- Wahabi because the Wahabis are Hanbalis[ CL: ascribed Ahmad bin Hanbal].

Yet the reformists who are enemies from Najd called them that because they want to ascribe to a new faith and accuse them of being infidels, yet that is not the case, the Hanbalis are Wahabis and the
Wahabis are Hanbalis in their faith although the name is new but the religion ofthe people ofAIKhumaysiyyah (a City in Najd) is the religion ofthe forefathers CL: That is the religion ofProfit
Muhammad and his Companions] and the religion ofthe Islamic Sheikh Bin Taymiya the religion of
its student sheikh Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab)2.
Whereas ‘Abd- aI-Wahab AI-Shammari mentions in his introducing ofAI-Wahabi Movement (The
Wahabi is the movement ofAI-Tunisi in Tunis and a friend ofHasan Khan in Mubal and Amir’Ali in
Kalkalta) 3

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. 36

Al-Shammari goes back to say: (The Jewish origins had reflected on the attitude of the Wahabies and the Su’ud family who have used Terrorism, Killing, Slaughtering, and destruction against the Arab Muslims. Through their alliance with the British, the foreigners, and some ofJewish Masonic leaders) 4And Khahni justifies this as follow (when the followers of; Abd-al-Wahab set out destroying domes and removing what was on the grave ofthe profit( God’s blessing and peace be upon him) from ornaments and Jewels; He and his friends were accused ofinfidelity and atheism. As a matter offact;

There was no need for this annoyance because the base ofthe Wahabi actions is connected to Sunnaitself because it was the recommendations ofthe profit (God-, blessing and peace be upon him)s.

And so does Darwazah to drop charges ofthe Wahabis when he says (The Ottoman state &
Muhammad ‘Ali, have collaborated on spreading a propaganda against the Wahabi missionary and
depict it as a distorted faith, or movement, from the book ofGod and the Sunna of his profit, So in
order to make their Muslim soldiers fight them because oftheir faith and prompt all the skins to
approve that just like what Al- Zaydiyyah did with their war on the Zaydi Imams. Although there is no deviation from the book ofGod and the Sunna ofhis profit especially in The Wahabi movement there is a calling to return to the book ofGod and the Sunna of his profit)6
Footnotes:

lAl- Wa’ili, Study ofthe Su’ud family, previously mentioned reference, page 177.

2 Father Karmily (AI- Khamisiyyah), Lughat Al Arab magazine [CL: The language ofthe Arabs]
1911 A.D. Page 18

3 AI- Khafni, The Encyclopedia AI- Farq, previous mentioned reform page 68.

4 AI- Shammari, Roots on the Wahabi movement & previousely mentioned reference, page 30

5 AI- Khafui, the encyclopedia AI-Farq previous mentioned reforms

6 Darwazah, The Birth ofthe Arabic Movement previously reference page 72-73
29

However; the professor attorney Mr. Faryid mentions in his book (The Wahabis are people who
followed the method ofMuhammad bin ‘Abd- al- Wahab; a man who was born in AI- Dar’iyyah, Arab
land form ofNajd and AI-Hijaz Ever since he was little he displayed signs ofnoble descent and,
determination, he was also known for his noble deeds among all who resort to him. After he studied
AI- Hanfi school ofthought in his home land, he traveled to Isfahan, Seeking its scholars and learned
from them until his religious information became vast especially in the area or interpreting the Koran.

He Returned to his homeland in 1171 Hegira and adopted the faith ofAba Hanifah and used religion as means to achieve the intentions ofhis prejudice faith or political goals, and used the method offorce, adventure and war as means of expanding and attacking. Thus, the Wahabis considered all Muslims infedals and their land is the land of atheism, and should be conquered as long as they don’t believe in the Wahabi missionary that denied all Islamic schools ofthought).1 Yet Muhammad Jawad Maghniyyah describes the Wahabi movement saying; (Since the Wahabi movement had emerged in the Arabic Peninsula during the eighteenth century, they have practiced.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 37- hostility, killing women, children, and elderly ofArab Muslims in the Arabic Peninsula and what surrounded him from the land ofIraq and ofGreat Syria. It is not strange that the final goal of Wahabis is to destroy Islam, and create division between Sunnis and Shiite)2
Darwazah then returns to remind that (No matter how the Wahabi movement originally possessed
corrective religious feature, yet the inclusion of Su’ud family in it, the mixing with politics, and the
end conclusion which was led by this Great Kingdom; all ofthat can be considered from the features of the Arabic Renaissance and the modem Arabic movement)3 Dr. Al- Khafni describes them in his encyclopedia by saying (Al- Wahabi movement is an elapsed movement driven by Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab 1115-1206 ofHegira spread out by many.

It was said that is a corrective religious notion which transformed the theroical thoughts ofBin Timiyyah into application. It was also said ofMuhammad bin Abd-al-wahab that, he is the chief ofthe modem corrective religious movement in the Arab Peninsula and he followed the righteous method ofthe ancestors calling for pure unity and condemning heresies and destroying what had gotten stuck to Islam from delusions. His missionary which he declared in 1143 ofHegira was the first flare for the Arabic renaissance in the whole world and the reform in India, Egypt, Iraq, Great Syria and Morocco and others. Who were affected so; AI-Alusi emerged in Iraq, Al- Afghani in Afghanistan,
Muhammad’Abbduh in Egypt, Jamal-ai-Din Al-Tunisi in Tunisia Sadiq Hasan Khan in Mubal, and
Amir Ali in Kalkata then his company made him:

1 AI-Shammari, the Wahabi Movement, previously reference, page 7

2 Maghliyyah, Muhammad Jawad, This is the Wahabi, AI-Jabal press, Beirut 1964 A.D., page 6-7

3 Darwazah, The History ofthe Arabic Movement, previously reference, page 7530 become diligent and independent, thus he established an independent faith which was acknowledged by his followers who attended to him, and many people accepted the faith)!. But Dr. Maymunah Khalifah stated that (Its is imperative that we judge the Wahabi movement by the standards ofits era in order to admit that; it brought on good deed to the region ofNajd and rescued it from the state of ciaos and division that prevailed)2

Then she goes back to say (The Wahabi movement is distinguished by a violent and strong feature; at the time in which it maintained its religious appearance, it became an extreme national political
movement in essence aiming for unity and the establishment of an Arabic empire and threw out the
Persian and Turkish foreign influence from the region. For that reason, the Wahabis got in conflict
with most oftheir neighbors; everyone who was not a Wahabi was accused of atheism and deviation
from what is right) 3.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.
– 38-
Lonkirk describes the Wahabi movement by saying: (Since then, the Najdi Empire ofBin Su’ud was
known by the Wahabi faith. Thus the believers ofthis narrow minded, anti-existence, and deserters
faith have expanded their tiny state by fighting Muslims whose faith became spoiled in their dealing
with their neighbors; each invasion had its religious Fatwah. Their hatred to prosperous deserters
surrounding Najd from every direction made them, not just, use extreme violence yet; they committed acts that made many people believe that their intention is to attack Islam itself. As a matter offact; their toughest citizens or their most savage tribes and fighters knew very little ofthe Koran and Suuna)4.

Footnotes

1 AI-Khafni, AI-Farq encyclopedia, previously mentioned reference, page 681.

2 AI-Sabah, The Kuwait Relations, previously mentioned reference, page 96.

3 Same reference, page 97

4 Lonkirk, Four Centuries, previously mentioned reference, page 111 and page 210.31

The Conclusion

The many trips of’Abd-al-Wahab, his interaction with Muslim Scholars all over the world, and
what he had learned and seen have affected his ideological structure. First; he studied AI-Hanbali
school ofthought, then AI-Hanafi school ofthought in Iraq and Turkey, and the Shiite faith in Iran; all ofthese studies had equipped him with more information about religion and interpretation which made him conceded so; he picked up a new school ofthought in which he denied Muslims, many oftheir traditions and worship principles, and accused them of atheism, the thing that made Muslims hate him more. His father, who was mentioned in the books they wrote, was among the first to oppose. The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. – 39- prevented him from going too far with his missionary. Soon after his father parted with life, he declared his missionary again until his brother Sulayman; judge ofHuraymulah, confronted him and accused him ofbeing atheist and heresy, and that is proved in the publications of Sheikh Khaz’al who is close to the Wahabis, and in all issuances ofthe Islamic world that consider the Wahabi movement destructive.

After ‘Abd-al-Wahab met with Muhammad bin Su’ud and combined their efforts, this religious
movement became political with dimensions and goals set for power and religion, in which the
movement have tried to control the Arabic Peninsula and its outer skirts and subjugate it to the power ofthe Saudi Wahabis, by using hostile practices such as killing, captivity, robbing wealth and
properties from their opponents in addition to destroying cities, burning them down, demolishing the domes ofits holy men, and stealing their treasures as to what happened to the dome ofZayd bin AIKhattab’s grave in AI-‘Ayniyyah, and what they did to the shrines of ‘Ali and AI-Husayn (peace be upon him) in the cities ofNajaf, Karbala’, and others.

The common interests between the Wahabis and the British have agreed in aggression and expansion. They have agreed by means ofsecret and open treaties, the first have imposed expansion in the Arabic Peninsula and eliminate their opponent from Arabic tribes, and the second goal was to control the countries ofthe Arab Gulf, rob their wealth and subjugate them to the power ofthe Su’ud family. In addition to that; they passed the Jewish-British scheme to find a home land for the Jews in Palestine.

The Wahabis were able to pass few heresies by mixing them with the Islamic teachings in order to
enable weakness ofthe mind and beliefin their calling. However; these myths had surfaces and were
cleared up by the efforts ofMuslims who have worked hard to expose the hidden evil intentions which the Wahabis were aiming at.

Finally, I ask God almighty and all powerful that I was successful in this modest work ofmine, and
God is the guardian ofsuccess. 32

References:

1. Hatatah, YusifKamil, The book ofThe Hijazi Matter, 1st edition, Baghdad 1926 A.D.
2. AI-Khafni, Dr. ‘Abd-al-Mun’im, The Encyclopedia ofDenominations, Groups, Schools of
Thought, Parties and Islamic Movements, 2 nd edition, Madbuli, Egypt, 1999 A.D.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 40-

3. Sheikh Khaz’al, Husay Khalaf, Biography of Sheikh Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, Dar AlKutub Press, 1st edition, Beiruth 1968 A.D.

4. Darwazah, Muhammad ‘Izzah, The Birth ofthe Modem Arabic Movement, The Modem
Library, 2nd edition, Beirut 1949 A.D.

5. Dixon, 1. D. Kuwait and its Neighbors, Traslation ofQasim Al-Mubarak, 1st edition, Part one,
Kuwait 1964 A.D.

6. Al-Sa’id, Nasir, History ofthe Su’ud Family, 1st edition, Part one.

7. Al-Shammari, Abd-al-Wahab, The True Wahabi Movement and The Roots, Dar Al-‘Urubah,
Beirut 1992 A.D.

8. TAwran, Mustafa, The Jews ofAl-Dawnamah, Translation ofKamal Al-Khawjah, Dar AlKutub Al-Masriyyah, Cairo 1989 A.D.

9. ‘Abd-al-Wahab, AI-Sheikh Muhammad, Publication of Sheikh Muhammad bin’Abd-alWahab, Compiled by ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz Al-Rumi and others, Islamic University ofMuhammad
bin Su’ud, Riyadh 1398 ofHegira.

10. Attorney Professor; Muhammad Farid Beh, History ofthe High Ottoman State, Dar AI-Jabal,
Beirut 1977 A.D.

11. Maghniyyah, Muhammad Wahab, This is the Wahabi, 1st edition, AI-Jabal Press, Beirut 1964
A.D.

12. Al-Najdi, Scholar ‘Uthman bin Bishr Al-Najdi, The Title ofGlory in the History ofNajd, Parts
one and two, Riyadh.

13. Loankrik, Four Centuries ofThe Modem History ofIraq, Translation ofJa’far Al-Khayyat, 3
rd edition, Baghdad 1968 A.D.

14. Al-Wa’ili, ‘Uthman bin Sa’d Al-Basari, Study ofthe Su’ud Family, Report ofDr. ‘Imad ‘AbdaI-Salam, Dar Al-Kitab Press, Baghdad 1991 A.D.

15. The Language ofthe Arabs Magazine, Issue no. 1, year 1911 A.D., Al-Adab Press, Baghdad

1911 A.D.

16. The Arabic Historian Magazine, Issue no. 34, year 1988 A.D., Baghdad. 33 I~~ge

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.-41-

2 Purpose

3 First Topic/ Britain And Its Animosity Towards Islam

4 A. Britain And Creating Faiths For Division

4 B. Britain’s Objectives From Weakening Islam

6 C. Britain’s Plans To control The Islamic Countries

7 D. The Reasons For Britain Fear OfThe Islamic Countries

8 E. How Did Britain Deployed Its Spies And The Creation Of Different Denominations
Among Muslims

12 Second Topic/ The Wahabi Movement Missionary

13 A. The History OfNajd

14 B. The Wahabi Movement And Its Founder Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab

17 C. Muhammad ‘Abd-al-Wahab’s Trips Before The Missionary

18 D. His Encounter With Muhammad bin Su’ud In AI-Dar’iyyah

20 Third Topic/ The Wahabi Invasions, Relations, And Views OfHistorians and Writers

21 A. AI-Wahabis Invasions in Najd

22 B. The Wahabis And AI-Hijaz

24 C. The Wahabi Movement And Iraq

26 D. The British-Wahabi Relations

28 E. Various Views In The Wahabi Movement

32 F. Conclusion

33 G. Reference 24

203The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 42-

In the name ofGod the most compassionate the most merciful

General Military Intelligence Directorate

Air Defense Security system

We Have Brought You The Clear Cut News From Saba’

Military Intelligence Directorate

A Study Titled:

The Truth about the Wahabi Movement

Intelligence Colonel

‘IjayI Ahmad Salih AI-Jumayli

Air Defense Security System

204The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 43-

The Truth About The Wahabi Movement
Index ofsubjects

Page Subject

No.

Introduction

Definition ofAI-Wahabi Movement

Historic Glance About the Wahabi Movement

The Organizational Structure ofthe Wahabi Movement

Rituals and Practices ofThe Wahabi Movement

The Common Jewish Descent ofMuhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab and Muhammad bin Su’ud

The Saudi Wahabi Jewish British Alliances

Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab And Muhammad bin Su’ud and the British Intelligence

The Aggression and Savageness ofthe Wahabis Towards the Arab Muslims

The British Plan to Destroy Islam and Muslims

Conclusion

References

Stamp reads:

Security Section ofthe Seventh Anti Aircraft Brigade

Number/ /

Date/ /

205The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.-44-

Stamp reads:

Security Section ofthe Seventh Anti Aircraft Brigade

Number/ /

Date/ /

Introduction

The purpose ofthis study is to reveal the truth about the traitor Wahabi Movement through its
behavior and acts, and the history ofthe birth ofits founder; Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab, his
connection and relations with foreign powers along with the Su’ud family where both have used the
Wahabi Movement as means to achieve their political objectives and their savage treatment with Arab Muslims who refused to accept their Wahabi belief; which disapproves of all Islamic schools of
thought whether they are Sunni or Shiite. The Wahabi’s attitude towards the Arab Muslims was
nothing but faces ofbetray, killing ofwomen, children, and elderly, as well as robbing properties and
disgrace.

Definition of AI-Wahabi Movement

It is a political and religious movement that is suspected in ideology and practice. It was
found by the colonial departments so it can work through it with the traitor Saudi regime in order to
fulfill its goals in the Arab Nation and the Muslim world in general by striking at the most important
element oftheir life and that is the Islamic religion. Furthermore; to create doubt in their most
cherished shrines and a ciaos in their thinking. They used the rout ofpower, adventure, and wars for
the sake of expansion and aggression. The Wahabis had considered all Muslims infidels and their lands are lands of atheism and must be controlled as long as they don’t believe in their Wahabi missionary which denied all Islamic faiths.

Brief Historic Glance at the Wahabi Movement and its Founder:

The Wahabi Movement had emerged in the Arabic Peninsula through the eighteenth century,
and the philosophy ofAI-Wahabi and the term Wahabi is relative to the founder ofthis movement
“Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab” who grew up in the city ofAI-‘Ayniyyah in Najd and called for
fanaticism and excessiveness in Islam so; he was thrown out by the people ofNajd and he went to Iraq.

He settled in the city ofAI-Basra, and set out again to call to his conservative views which contradict
the principles ofIslam. The people ofAI-Basra got upset with him and threw him out because he was
telling people oftraditions ofthe profit that were not entrusted in the Books ofSunna. He was also
interpreting Koran in ways which were not intended by the God ofthe skies. He escaped from AIBasra on foot and almost died of extreme heat, thirst, and hunger. He returned to Najd and settled in the city of “Huraymulah” then he was thrown out ofit and returned.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 45-

Stamp reads:

Security Section ofthe Seventh Anti Aircraft Brigade

Number/ /

Date/ /

to “AI-‘Ayniyyah” and was behaving as ifhe was a new profit, talking in the name ofthe creator his
almighty; just like what the deserters did after the death ofthe seal ofthe profits and missionaries
Muhammad, God’s blessings and peace be upon him,just like Musaylima the liar.
Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab took advantage ofhis new location in AI-‘Ayniyyah and started
evoking trouble and disorder resulting from his order to destroy the dome ofthe grave of ‘Vmar bin
‘Abd-al-Khattab, may God be pleased with him, and all holy shrines, as well as not paying almsgiving
and other conduct which contradict religious obligations. This made Muslims ofthe Arab Peninsula
become outraged therefore; the prince ofAI-Hisa’ and AI-Qatif, ordered ‘Vthman bin Mu’ammar to
get rid ofMuhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab so, he was thrown out ofAI-‘Ayniyyah. Bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab
chose to go to AI-Dar’iyyah. He arrived there in 1160 of Hegira to meet an individual who isn’t much
different in his wrongful behavior, this individual was Muhammad bin Su’ud bin Muhammad who is a relative ofthe current Su’ud family.

In the beginning ofthe eighteenth century, the Su’ud family’s influence settled in the city ofAIDar’iyyah which prompted Muhammad bi Su’ud to search for a way to achieve his ambitions in
expanding his power outside AI-Dar’iyyah and controlling the Land (Najd) by invasion and adventure.

He agreed with Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab to use the Wahabi principles in politically by
considering all Arab Muslims in Arab Peninsula (Infidels who have deviated from Islam and deserted it because they are non Wahabis) Therefore they should be killed and attack their homeland, seize their properties, kill them, and violate their women.

The Organizational Structure ofthe Wahabi Movement:

The Wahabi Movement’s organizational structure is a pyramid frame as follow:

a. Comrade. It is the first step that a person newly gained to the faith goes through.
b. Herald
c. Mujahid
d. Chief
e. Trustee
f. Member ofthe Consultative Council

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 46-

g. Group Leader

As for the organizational units and their subsidiary cells; they are:
a. The Circle. Designated for a group of comrades and led by Mujahid.
b. Family. A circle of chiefs led by a trustee.
c. Troop. A Circle oftrustees lead be a member ofthe consultative council
d. Annual Conference: nominated to it a chief and above in rank.

Rituals and Practices of the Wahabi Movement:

Wahabi has its own practices and rituals that are perfonned during worship ceremonies and
through which we can identify its elements and external aspects which are represented by the
following:

1. Wearing a short gown (Dishdashah), and long under trousers, preferably white color.

2. Growing ofthe beard and trimming ofthe mustache.

3. Walking in groups or being present in groups.

4. They look as follow for the Friday prayers:

a. They do not pray the Sunna prayer.

b. They rest their hands on the upper part oftheir chest.

c. Stand with their feet semi spread.

d. Stand in the first raw so others can emulate them in their moves.

e. Constantly move the index finger in prayer, while reading the greetings.

5. They do not pray in mosques which contain tombs.

6. They do not cite any prayers after the calling for prayer had ended.

7. A Muslim’s saying: Our Master Muhammad, God’s blessing and peace be upon him, (because;they say that he had died) and he is no one; God had sent him and his role is completed.

8. The recommend no visiting oftombs, no building ofdomes and rooms over the tombs, and
make that forbidden.

Secret:

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.-47 –

9. Considering the reading ofKoran in a loud voice before the Friday prayer, a heresy.

10. Forbid TV watching, going to the movies, and taking pictures.

11. Exercise religious slogans during marriage ceremonies.

The Jewish descent ofMuhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab and Muhammad bin Su’ud

1. The original Arabic sheikhs ofNajd as well as the scientific resources, confirm thatMuhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab is from a Jewish family from “AI-Dawnamah” in Turkey. The Dawnamah here refers to those Jews who have declared their Islam for the purpose ofharming Islam and save themselves from the chase by the Ottoman Sultans.

The story ofthose Turkish Jews begins in the seventeenth century when the Jewish (ShaShai
Zaybi) claimed that the expected Messiah who told the priests that he will appear in tongues to
save the Jews ofthe world from the oppression which they were subject to during the
seventeenth century because ofthe struggle over faiths in Europe and the Catholic inspection
courts. Thus Shabahai had Jewish supporters so; he was convicted by the Ottoman authorities
and was notified by Sheikh AI-Islam (An Ottoman religious position) at the Sublime Porte [CL:
Ottoman authority] that; he will be executed by hitting him with arrows and ifhe doesn’t die;
the Sultan will change his claim that he is the expected Messiah.

When Shibshai felt death in front of his eyes, he denied the Messiah and superficially declared his Islam and that his name is (Sir ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz). But as a matter offact, he never had gotten rid of his Judaism better yet; his Rabi friends were happy that he superficially declared his Islam because; he saved his life and their movement. Therefore the Turkish Muslims called Shabshai and his Jewish followers who have pretended to be Muslims; the name (Dawnamah). It is a Turkish name which means; the return to the right guidance. Thus AI-Dawnamah played a major role in harming Islam and Muslims, and directly contributed to all factors that destroyed Islamic values in the society and
the immorality and bad behavior ofMuslims.

The Jews ofDawnamah who have pretended to be Muslims; continued to practice their
Shabathic Jewish traditions which emphasized not to marry Muslims and pretend their
adherence to the traditions.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. 48-

Secret:

and values ofIslam so that; they will not be harassed by anyone. One ofthe things was for
everyone to have two names; one fake Muslim name, and one original Jewish name such as;
(Schulman) and his alleged name is Sulayman, one ofthe merchants in the Turkish city of
Burhat. This Jew left Turkey and settled in Damascus/ Syria; trading in Islamic religion after he
let his beard grow and wore the Muslim turban. Thus he was denied by the people of Syria and
they threw him out for his quackery He fled to Egypt and was received with opposition, he left
to AI-Hijaz afterwards and stayed in Mecca. The people ofMecca threw him out for his
quackery as well. Finally he settled in a village called AI-‘Ayniyyah, there he found room for
quackery and claimed to be ofthe descent ofRabi’ah and that he was born in Morocco after his
father traveled there. Tjen Schulman or (Sulayman) and had a child whom he called’Abd-alWahab then ‘Abd-al-Wahab had children whom one ofthem is called Muhammad; the founder
ofthe Wahabi calling.

2. As for his partner in the Wahabi missionary, Muhammad bin Su’ud; he is of a Jewish descent
as well ascending to the Jew (Mardakhai bin Ibrahim bin Mushi) who used to sell kernels in AIBasra. A group from (‘Anzah) tribe, AI-Masalikh moiety; came to buy from him, and when
they told him that they were from AI-Masalikh he pretended to be from the same family, but he
came to Iraq long time ago and settled in AI-Basra because ofa dispute between his father and
members of’Anzah tribe. Because ofthis alleged relationship, Mardakhai gave this group
generously and loaded the camels for them which made them very happy to have a cousin in
Iraq, and when AI-Masalikh intended to leave and return to their homeland, Mardakhai asked
them ifhe can accompany them to his alleged homeland Najd. They welcomed him and so has
Mardakhai arrived in Najd and his name became (Farhan Ibrahim Musa). By virtue of his
wealth, a number ofChristians have gathered around him which made the tribes ofAI-‘Ajman,
Bani Khalid, and Banu Hajar sense the seriousness ofthe deceitful Jew and threw him out
where he fled to a land by AI-‘Arid called; (Al-Malibaydir wa Ghasibah) known today as (AIRiyadh) So; he asked ‘Abdallah bin Hajar, the owner ofthat land, for his permission to stay
there and he agreed, but Mardakhai, the Jew, betrayed the man and killed him and his family
and seized the land and called it (AI-Dur’iyyah) to settle in it. Later on; Mardakhai married his
son who came with him from.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 49-

Secret:

AI-Basra, whose name was (Jack Dan) and he changed to (AI-Qarn). He married him to a
woman from (‘Anzah) tribe who gave birth to Muhammad and Su’ud afterwards; hence the
descent ofthe Su’ud family started in AI-Dar’iyyah, which goes back in origin to this Jewish
murderer and thief.

The Saudi Wahabi British Jewish Alliances:

The Saudi Wahabi relations with the British go back to the eighteenth century, for they are the
ones who worked up with Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab the extremist so alleged Wahabi
Movement, and they are the ones who brought together him, and Muhammad bi Su’ud in order
to combine their efforts in serving the British colonial interests, and destroy the Arabic Islamic
principles and values. These relations and cooperation lasted through the nineteenth century. In
the early twentieth century, the British began to develop these relations in a form of compacts
and agreements after the Wahabis ofthe Su’ud family had become a great entity in the Arabic
Peninsula due to their invasions, inhumanity, and the help ofthe British. To execute these
duties, the British government had prepared a British officer (Jewish) in India by the name of
David Shakespeare, and sent him to Riyadh when the First World War erupted to represent the
British interests there.

In the early 1915 A.D. Shakespeare led one ofthe Wahabi invasions along with ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz
bin Su’ud to conquer Ha’il. The British intelligence had mobilized an expedition consisting of
five thousand individuals, started from Kuwait to kill the Rashid family who were against the
British. But the Rashid family, the Shammar family, and the people ofHa’il were capable of
defeating this invading power and killed David Shakespeare in that battle. Thus this was a
catastrophe to Britain and the Wahabi Su’ud family.

The Jewish Wahabi Saudi relations have continued on and become deep-rooted with time to the
extent that the British officials were talking about Palestine and the Jews without any
embarrassment or hesitation. In 1945 A.D. and to be exact, on February 17; and in Cairo, ‘Abdal-‘Azizi bin Su’ud met with the well known, colonialist and British prime minister, and.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 50- guardian ofJews, (Winston Churchill) the man who truly proven to be a friend in the time of hardship and distress, and ifit wasn’t for him the Jews would have never reached the minimal of their rights.

Secret

Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab and Muhammad bin Su’ud and the British Intelligence
In 1973, the autobiography ofthe British spy “Humfer” has been translated in regards to his
work in Istanbul and Iraq, and his relation with Muhammad bin’Abd-al-Wahab, the founder of
the Wahabi Movement, when he was living in AI-Basra where he met him and befriended him.
Thus their relationship became substantial and intimate to the degree which enabled Humfer,
the spy, to stir Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab the way the British intelligence chose to.
Afterwards, when Muhammad ‘Abd-al-Wahab was in Isfahan; he was openly approached to
run the Wahabi Movement in order to fulfill the British plan as a course, in return for Britain
protecting him from other governments, and scholars who will attack him by means ofmoney
and weapons, in addition to having an emirate, even ifit is small, on the outer skirts ofNajd.
As for the conditions which Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab had put forth; they are to do the
following:

1) Expiate all Muslims and permit killing them, steal their money and dishonor
their dignity.

2) Demolish AI-Ka’ba for it is an atheist remnant, prevent people from
performing pilgrimage, and entice the tribes ofstealing pilgrims and killing
them.

3) Work hard to prevent the teachings ofthe caliphs and fight the nobles ofHijaz
[CL: The Sharif].

4) Destroy domes, tombs, and holy shrines in Mecca, Medina and everywhere
else; considering it atheist and polytheism, in addition to disrespect to the
Profit Muhammad, God’s blessing and peace be upon him, his Caliphates, and
the Islamic Scholars.

5) Spread confusion and terror in the land.

6) Propagate a modified and deviated Koran.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 51-

Years after the ‘Abd-al-Wahab began his work; the British official circles, were able to win
Muhammad bin Su’ud, and asked him to work along with Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab.
They sent the spy Humfer to inform them that; Muhammad bin ‘Abd-al-Wahab will assume
religion, while Muhammad bin Su’ud will assume authority so they can conquer people’s
hearts and bodies. Britain was supplying them secretly with sufficient money, and bought them
few servants, who were the best British intelligence officers, and trained them in Arabic
language and desert fights.

Secret

The Aggression and Savageness of the Wahabis Towards the Arab Muslims
The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries have witnessed invasions and wars ofdestruction and
elimination carried by the Wahabis against the Arab Muslims people ofNajd, Iraq, and Great Syria and after that; AI-Hijaz in the early twentieth century.

The Wahabis began to expand in the land of Najd and their struggle with the princes ofRiyadh lasted
since the year 1746 A.D. that is the year in which the prince of Medina and its people, women and
children, to evacuate it because of the savage nature of the Wahabis. But Muhammad bin Su’ud sent
his Wahabi army led by his son ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz to other areas of Najd under the pretense of, cleansing
Islam from polytheism and heresies. In 1792 A.D. they conquered most of AI-Ihsa’ region and it
became the base for their expansion in the eastern part ofthe Arabic Peninsula.
Besides; the continuous attacks which the Wahabis have launched against Iraq and its tribes as well as the inhumanity practiced in the name ofspreading the light of God and his untruly and falsely calling, had made the Iraqi tribes fight the Wahabis in the same way they fight infidel thieves.

Therefore the Wahabis poured their severe anger on the Iraqis and their various faiths; hence the Iraqi situation became worse between the years of 1792 – 1797 because the raids were fast and inhumane in their assault on properties and dignities.

Thus, sheikh Thuwayni, sheikh ofAI-Muntafik, had confronted them; he was the first Iraqi to lead the fight against them. He gathered around him people of the Arabs of ‘Aqil from Baghdad, and relieves came from other Iraqi cities especially; Kuwait and AI-Zubayr. He tried to go deeper in to kill the Wahabis but he was killed on the hands of a black man whom they have utilized for that purpose. The savage Wahabi invasions continued against the tribes in western part of Iraq, and after one year and few weeks they decided to send a new expedition to Iraq in the summer of 1798 A.D. So; the tribes of Bani ‘Aqil, AI-‘Abyd, Shammar and others gathered under the leadership of Muhammad Beh AI-

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification. – 52-

Shawi and moved forward to AI-Basra and was joined by the tribes of AI-Zafir, AL-Muntafak, and
Bani Khalid. Thus the Bin Su’ud the Wahabi army leader was afraid to face them and agreed to the
conditions they presented to him which are; not to attack Iraq, treat the Iraqi pilgrims with kindness, return the cannons the he had seized, and pay a fine. The Wahabi, Bin Su’ud agreed and signed the agreement in the year 1799.

Secret

But the Wahabis have violated the agreement and started attacking the Iraqi pilgrims then raided the city of(‘Innah) in 1800 A.D., they killed, robbed, and raided the village of(Kabisah) but its people
resisted them vigorously.

They also attacked Karbala’ in 1801 A.D. seeking the holy tombs ofthe grandchildren ofProfit
Muhammad, God’s blessings and peace be upon him, permitting the killing ofwomen, children and
elders, destroying the tomb ofImam AI-Husayn (May God be pleased with him) and tear out its iron
bars, fence and mirrors, furthermore; they looted the inscriptions and the precious findings from the
gifts ofthe Pashas and Princes, they also stole the wall sculpture, pulled out the gold from ceilings,
stole chandeliers and fancy rugs, precious hangings and doors set in jewels. This savage and barbaric
expedition led by Su’ud bin ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz bin Su’ud.

The Iraqis did not attack the Wahabi ‘Abd-al-‘Aziz bin Su’ud much, but after about one year; an Iraqi attacked’Abd-al-‘Aziz and killed him in AI-Dar’iyyah stabbing with a knife in revenge for what the Wahabis had done in Karbala’ .

The British plan to destroy Islam and Muslims:

Revealing the British intelligence documents that aimed to destroy Islam and Muslims within
one century, so Islam become old news after being the reality which confronted its top agents working to achieve the fourteen items ofthe agreement. They ordered to keep the document secretive and warned about disclosing its contents so that Muslims will not be aware ofit and take adverse actions, and the document sums up as follow:

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 53-

1. The positive cooperation with the Caesars ofRussia to seize the Islamic region ofBukhara,
Tajikistan, Armenia, Kharasan, and others and cooperating with them.

2. The positive cooperation with France and Russia to put together a comprehensive plan to
destroy the Islamic world internally and externally.

3. Create disputes and severe conflicts between the Turkish and Persian governments and stir up
sectarianism and racialism between both sides.

4. Give part ofthe Islamic countries to non Muslims; (first) Yathrib to the Jews, (second)
Alexandria to the Christians, (third) Yazid to the Parisian Zarusht,

Secret

(fourth) AI-‘Amara to AI-Sa’ibah, (fifth) Karaminshah for those who make God out of’Ali
bin Abi Talib, (sixth) AI-Musil for AI-Yazidyyin, (seventh) the Gulf ofDhars to the Hindus, (eighth) Tripoli for Druze, and (ninth) Qarid for AI-Tubiyyin.

5. Planning to squander both Turkish and Persian Islamic governments into the largest number
possible of conflicting small local authorities as is the case in India, applying the rule of
(Divide and Conquer) and (Divide and Destroy).

6. Plant false religions and faiths in the body ofthe Islamic countries as follow:

a. Plant four religions in the body ofthe Shiite countries as follow:

1) A religion that idolizes AI-Hussayn bin ‘Ali, and the right location is Karbala’

2) A religion that worships Ja’far AI-Sadiq, and the right location is Isfahan

3) A religion that worships AI-Mihdi AI-Maw’ud and the right location is
Samirra’.

4) A religion that worships ‘Ali AI-Rida, and the right location is Kharasan.
b. Make the four Sunni faiths, independent without connection to each other; they are the
only Muslims and the rest are infidels and should be killed and eradicated.

7. Spread immorality among Muslims through adultery, sodomy, alcohol, and gambling.

8. Take an interest in cultivating corrupted rulers in the land that are a tool in the hands ofthe
British.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 54-

9. Prohibit the Arabic language as much as possible and expand on non Arabic languages such as,
Sanskrit, Bayisiyyah, Kurdish, and Pashto; and expand the scope for local dialects branching
offArabic which entails disconnecting Arabs from the great language which is the language of
Koran and Sunna.

Secret

The Conclusion

From what was previously mentioned about the acts ofthose bloody murderers who have
distorted Islam and its principles, and using it as the tool to fulfill the Zionist and Colonial aspirations
to divide the unity ofMuslims, humiliate them and control their lands and fortunes. The Su’ud family
and the Wahabis were the tool which was and still is at work to destroy the Arabic Islamic civilization, expiate the nation ofMuhammad (God’s blessing and peace be upon him), and their rule was; you’re either a Wahabi or will be killed, robbed, your money will be seized and your dignity is violated.

The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US classification.- 55-

Resources

1. The book ofThe Wahabi Movement! The Truth and Roots – Written by ‘Abd-al-Wahab
Ibrahim Al-Shammari.

2. Autobiography ofthe British spy; Humfer

3. The Wahabi Movement – A Study and analysis – Al-Anbar branch Command.
The classification markings are original to the Iraqi documents and do not reflect current US

classification.- 56-
Signed by

Intelligence Colonel

‘Ijayl Ahmad Salih Al-Jumayli

Air Defense Security System

April 15, 2002
(P

Posted in Saudi ArabiaComments Off on The Birth of AI-Wahabi Movement And it’s Historic Roots

How Satanism Works

NOVANEWS

they live.jpeg

Is Society Devoted to Satan? 

A sacrifice of billions of humans would be most pleasing to Satan.
This will be the objective of the Antichrist and his followers.”


by Alan Gardner
(henrymakow.com)    
           

For some, the portal to the service of Satan is through the college fraternity or the lodge.

m-7.jpeg

A young man is approached to join a fraternity. His character is evaluated to see what are his moral limits. If his ambition exceeds his patriotism, belief in goodness or allegiance to his loved ones, he is a candidate for Satanism.

It is similar in the lodge. A man is invited to join the ‘blue lodge’ and monitored to see how ambitious he is.

Is he content to become a Master or third degree Mason or is he someone who can be groomed to go further?

Those who are seeking power and influence rise up through the degrees taking increasingly bloodthirsty oaths and promises.

There are many obsessive-compulsions that make one vulnerable to Satan’s power.

The most obvious obsessive behaviors are related to food, alcohol, tobacco and drugs. Equally potent, are violent and pornographic video games and movies.

CHILD ABUSE

Many of the most powerfully obsessive compulsive behaviors lead to the physical and/or sexual abuse of innocent victims, often children.

jerry-sandusky.jpg

Organizations give the greatest rewards to those who make the greatest commitment to their objectives. Satanism is no different. The greatest power goes to those who commit violence against the innocent. The ultimate expression of satanic power is the power over life and death.

Many satanic leaders are recruited at an early age. It is a custom among some members of the upper class to send their sons away to boarding schools where they are  exploited by the older class men. This satanic indoctrination through sexual abuse anticipates that the abused child will in turn become an abuser. Fathers often send their sons to these boarding schools knowing from their own experience what the risk is.

Men, who have been sexually abused as children by males often grow up to be bisexual. They marry and have children with women who may or may not know what is in store for their male children.

Why would a father subject his children to such abuse? Fathers assent to such abuse against their sons in their quest for power. Satan gives the greatest power to those who will violate the innocent in his name; the greater the violation, the greater the power.

Satan rewards those who will spill blood in his honor. At the lowest levels of power seeking, the blood might be that of an animal. At the higher levels, the blood is human. The shedding of innocent human blood is highly rewarded by Satan.

WHAT IS SATAN’S ULTIMATE GOAL?

His goal is the exact opposite of God’s, who wishes that all be saved.
Satan wants every human to die hating God or being indifferent to His existence.

There are more than seven billion humans alive today. Satan’s goal is to persuade a few of his most ardent followers to kill the remainder.

A sacrifice of billions of humans would be most pleasing to Satan.
This will be the objective of the Antichrist and his followers.

Satanists support the decriminalization of abortion, where deceived mothers willingly participate in the killing of their own children, usually in a very painful way.

Such mothers receive no reward from Satan for their participation in homicide. In fact, the shame that Satan directs at those who have killed their children, often results in them killing themselves, directly or indirectly.

War is Satan’s most prolific method of using humans to kill on his behalf.
There are no “just” wars. Revisionist history shows there was as much evil on the part of the British and the Americans as the Germans and the Japanese during WWII.

One of Satan’s great deceits is to disguise his followers behind movements such as, Fascism, Communism, Capitalism, Anarchism, Atheism, Judaism, Catholicism, Protestantism and Islam.

Who doubts that billionaires like Bill and Melinda Gates, Warren Buffett and Ted Turner are not loyal servants of their master [Satan], when you examine how they use their money?

Men such as Darwin, Marx and Kinsey were great haters of God.
They continue to deceive many, even beyond the grave.

Most of the levers of power are controlled by men who hate or are indifferent to God. Most have embraced Satanism in their quest for power. These men have not been elected to political office.

They belong to what is sometimes described as the ‘shadow government’.
They are the makers of kings. They are working hard to bring about the reign of the Antichrist.

Only Satan knows who they are. Nothing is published about these men!

All three of the institutional religions of the Book, Christianity, Islam and Judaism have been corrupted at the highest levels by men who are working to bring about the reign of Satan.

Evil is personified in a name, Lucifer, the Light-Bearer. He has authored an incredible illusion.

Few people believe in him, as a person, anymore; the ‘Illuminated Ones’ excepted.  How ‘enlightened’ humanity is becoming!


Makow Comment: I am optimistic that the Illuminati do not have a mass culling in mind. They would have not invested so much energy in degrading and transforming society to fit their purposes if they intended to destroy it. You don’t train an animal you’re planning to cull. The world is a debt farm. We are their cattle. They “milk” us for interest on the “debt” they create out of thin air.

Posted in EducationComments Off on How Satanism Works

Morsi Joining Alliance Against Zionist Terror?

NOVANEWS

Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem Sr

Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi (L) shakes hands with an Egyptian soldier who was wounded in an attack in Sinai during a visit to soldiers at a hospital in Cairo, August 7, 2012.Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi (L) shakes hands with an Egyptian soldier who was wounded in an attack in Sinai during a visit to soldiers at a hospital in Cairo, August 7, 2012.

First published at Press TV  Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:42AM GMT

By Kevin Barrett

With Iran’s president demanding 9/11 truth and fighting off Mossad terrorism, and the democratic elements of Turkey’s leadership surviving such false flag terror plots as Sledgehammer and Ergenekon, will Egypt’s President Morsi join in an eventual regional alliance against Zionist-assisted false flag terror?

By firing some of Egypt’s leading Mossad-assisted false flag terrorists last Sunday, he may have taken a significant step in that According to Asia Times analyst Pepe Escobar, Egypt’s new president Mohammed Morsi has “started to move more boldly against the army after an attack by militants in Sinai that killed 16 border guards.”

To say that the Egyptian president is “moving boldly” is an understatement. Last Sunday, President Morsi fired the chiefs of Egypt’s navy, air force, and air defense forces, along with the defense minister and army chief of staff. All of the fired military leaders were closely associated with the defunct Mubarak regime.

In public, President Morsi claimed that he was firing the military officials for incompetence. Like John F. Kennedy in the wake of the Bay of Pigs fiasco, who used the failed operation’s “incompetence” as an excuse to fire CIA spook-meister Allan Dulles, Egypt’s president appears to have won his battle with the military on the battlefield of public opinion.

But like JFK, who did not tell the world the full truth about the CIA’s and military’s attempt to hoodwink him into invading Cuba, President Morsi may not yet be telling the whole truth about what really happened in Sinai and why he really fired his military leadership.

Egypt’s top military officials, especially those closest to Mubarak, were notorious for their collaboration with Israel’s Mossad in arranging false flag terror attacks designed to be blamed on “radical Muslims.” The attack in the Sinai, which killed sixteen Egyptian border guards, may have been such a false flag.

Whenever a spectacular, widely-reported terrorist attack occurs, the first question that must be asked is cui bono, or “who gains”? Israel’s Ha’aretz correspondent Akiva Eldar said of the Sinai attack: “The Israelis are in a way quite happy that the Egyptians have learnt their lesson, that they have to listen to us, and have had to pay the price.” In other words, the only party with anything obvious to gain from the Sinai attack was Israel, which wanted to punish Egypt for starting to open up its borders with Gaza.

While the attack was publicly attributed to Salafi jihadists, its extreme professionalism suggests that it must have had a state sponsor. As Dr. Ashraf Ezzat wrote in Veterans Today:

“Regardless of how the brainwashed jihadists view it, this terrorist operation only benefits Israel. And in fact, some Egyptian analysts have strong doubts as to the role of Israel in this terrorist operation and how it had been anticipated by the Israeli intelligence only two days before. 

“What are the chances for two armed vehicles haphazardly storming the Israeli borders of surviving the attack, let alone achieve anything. Were the assailants not aware that they would be spotted on the Israelis’ radar the moment they crossed the line and stepped into the Israeli side of the borders? … Or were they assured otherwise?”

The Mubarak cronies running Egypt’s military were notorious for their collaboration with Israel in similar false flag operations. As I wrote in the immediate aftermath of the Egyptian Revolution:

“One of the biggest sparks that set off the Egyptian revolution was blacked out of the US media. 

“That spark was widespread anger that Mubarak’s regime collaborated with the Israeli Mossad to bomb a Coptic church in Alexandria on New Years’ Eve – and blame it on Muslims. The whole Middle East saw right through it immediately, and the Egyptian people’s disgust was a big part of what led them to overthrow Mubarak.”

President Morsi is fortunate that the Egyptian people understand that Mubarak’s military and their Zionist friends were behind much of the “radical Islamic terrorism” that afflicted Egypt during the Mubarak era. The majority of the Egyptian people, unlike most Americans, understand false flag terrorism all too well, because they have suffered so much from it.

A Western poll taken in Egypt showed that 72% of Egyptians do not believe that al-Qaeda was responsible for the 9/11 attacks in America. In this, they are in complete agreement with Egypt’s leading public intellectual, Mohammed Heikal, who said in October 2001: “Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and al-Qaeda has been penetrated by American intelligence, Pakistani intelligence, Saudi intelligence, Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret an operation that required such a degree of organization and sophistication.”

President Morsi, for his part, may be following in the footsteps of Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad by publicly opposing false flag terrorism and standing up for 9/11 truth. Like Ahmadinejad, Fidel Castro of Cuba, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, and former Italian President Cossiga, Egypt’s new president has publicly stated that he does not believe the official story of 9/11.

Additionally, President Morsi publicly supports the movement to free Omar Abdel Rahman, the so-called “blind Sheikh,” who was falsely blamed for the mobbed-up New York FBI office’s bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. (The FBI also orchestrated the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, according to convicted bomber Terry Nichols.)

With Iran’s president demanding 9/11 truth and fighting off Mossad terrorism, and the democratic elements of Turkey’s leadership surviving such false flag terror plots as Sledgehammer and Ergenekon, will Egypt’s President Morsi join in an eventual regional alliance against Zionist-assisted false flag terror? By firing some of Egypt’s leading Mossad-assisted false flag terrorists last Sunday, he may have taken a significant step in that direction.

Posted in EgyptComments Off on Morsi Joining Alliance Against Zionist Terror?

NAZI JEWISH ATTACKED PALESTINIANS YOUTH

NOVANEWS

 

‘Today I saw a lynch with my own eyes, in Zion Square, in the center of Jerusalem’

Aug 17, 2012

Annie Robbins

Jerusalem 2012. The account first appeared on Facebook in Hebrew. Translated by Haaretz:

Dozens of Jewish youths attacked three young Palestinians in Jerusalem’s Zion Square early on Friday morning, in what one witness described as “a lynch” on Facebook.

…….

The three were allegedly attacked by youths shouting “Death to the Arabs” at them, as well as other racial slurs. One of them fell on the floor, and his attackers continued to beat him until he lost consciousness. They subsequently fled from the scene.

Within a short period of time rescue volunteers and Magen David Adom rescue services arrived on the scene, and found the victim with no pulse and not breathing. After a lengthy resuscitation attempt, he was transferred to hospital.

Writing on her Facebook page, one eye witness decribed the attack as a lynch: “Its late at night, and I can’t sleep. My eyes are full of tears for a good few hours now and my stomach is turning inside out with the question of the loss of humanity, the image of God in mankind, a loss that I am not willing to accept.”

“But today I saw a lynch with my own eyes, in Zion Square, the center of the city of Jerusalem ….. and shouts of ‘A Jew is a soul and Arab is a son of a –,’ were shouted loudly and dozens (!!) of youths ran and gathered and started to really beat to death three Arab youths who were walking quietly in the Ben Yehuda street,” the witness wrote.

“When one of the Palestinian youths fell to the floor, the youths continued to hit him in the head, he lost consciousness, his eyes rolled, his angled head twitched, and then those who were kicking him fled and the rest gathered in a circle around, with some still shouting with hate in their eyes.”

“When two volunteers [from local charities] went into the circle, they tried to perform CPR the mass of youths standing around started to say resentfully that we are resuscitating an Arab, and when they passed near us and saw that the rest of the volunteers were shocked, they asked why we were so in shock, he is an Arab.

Mairav Zonszein has an account here. (Hat tip MW commenter Taxi)

Posted in Palestine Affairs, ZIO-NAZIComments Off on NAZI JEWISH ATTACKED PALESTINIANS YOUTH

Mondoweiss Online Newsletter

NOVANEWS

Dennis Ross urges Iran war in deceptive ‘NYT’ op-ed

Aug 17, 2012

Matthew Taylor

Under the misleading headline “How America Can Slow Israel’s March to War,” former White House official/former and current Israel lobbyist Dennis Ross delivers a prescription for the opposite:

Second, America should begin discussions with the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Germany (the so called P5+1) about a “day after” strategy in the event that diplomacy fails and force is used. This would signal to both Israel and Iran that we mean what we say about all options being on the table.

Third, senior American officials should ask Israeli leaders if there are military capabilities we could provide them with — like additional bunker-busting bombs, tankers for refueling aircraft and targeting information — that would extend the clock for them.

And finally, the White House should ask Mr. Netanyahu what sort of support he would need from the United States if he chose to use force — for example, resupply of weapons, munitions, spare parts, military and diplomatic backing, and help in terms of dealing with unexpected contingencies. The United States should be prepared to make firm commitments in all these areas now in return for Israel’s agreement to postpone any attack until next year — a delay that could be used to exhaust diplomatic options and lay the groundwork for military action if diplomacy failed.

If Dennis Ross represented any country other than Israel, he’d be exposed as an agent of a foreign government subverting U.S. foreign policy in opposition to U.S. best interests.

The solution to the current standoff with Iran begins with a long-overdue apology and reparations for the overthrow of Mossadegh.

Los Angeles should say no to segregation, and say no to Veolia

Aug 17, 2012

Estee Chandler Tony Litwinko Shakeel Syed

Angelenos may not know Veolia Transportation, the company that runs bus services across our city. But its history of discrimination against Palestinians means both our city’s reputation and our tax dollars are at stake. The Los Angeles City Council ought not to destroy the hard-earned image of our City of Angels by doing business with a company that operates much like Southern bus companies that once discriminated against African Americans.

Veolia Environment is a 155-year-old multinational company based in France that operates in 77 countries. In the United States, its subsidiary, Veolia Transportation is bidding to renew its contract with the City of Los Angeles to operate our DASH buses. Accepting the bid would make the City of Angels complicit in discriminatory practices.

Veolia claims its mission as “serving communities and passengers, going beyond simply moving from one place to another, ensuring simpler, easier and seamless mobility.” Presumably that means all communities and all passengers Veolia serves.

This sounds praiseworthy. But it could not be farther from the truth. During our travels in the Israeli-occupied territories of Palestine, we did not witness Veolia “focusing on serving communities and passengers.” To the contrary, we witnessed Veolia’s refusal to serve millions of Palestinians who live in the West Bank.

In the occupied West Bank, Veolia operates bus lines that connect Jewish-only settlements to Israel. These buses do not stop in Palestinian towns and use Israeli-only roads, built on land confiscated from the Palestinians for the exclusive use of Israelis and settlers. West Bank Palestinians are denied access in a throwback arrangement reminiscent of the Jim Crow South.

Then there is the Jerusalem Light Rail Project Veolia is constructing which will link illegal Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem to Israel. That tramway not only helps make the illegal settlements permanent but also serves as a critical component of the Israeli settlements infrastructure, “undermining any chances of a just peace for the Palestinian people,” according to the international human rights group Global Exchange.

Israeli settlements and the whole settler infrastructure that supports them in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are not only illegal under international law but also by our country’s own policy for many decades.

Veolia’s rules reflect Israel’s deliberate policy of ethnic segregation, which is the subject of harsh criticism by a recent U.N. report expressing “extreme [concern] at the consequences of policies and practices which amount to de facto segregation.”

Yes. Segregation.

We believe Veolia’s discriminatory provision of transportation services is antithetical to the values and policies of the City of Los Angeles. Such behavior would not have been tolerated by Angelenos in apartheid South Africa; similarly, it should not be tolerated when practiced by Israel against West Bank Palestinians.

Los Angeles has a proud history of standing against discrimination locally and internationally. In 1984 Los Angeles was one of the first major cities in the U.S. to divest from apartheid South Africa as part of an international boycott and divestiture movement that was critical in bringing down that regime. Similarly, in 2010 the LA City Council voted to boycott Arizona and any companies based there because of Arizona’s discriminatory anti-immigrant law SB1070. And in 2008 and 2009, the City’s Fire and Police Commissions terminated relationships with a program run by the Boy Scouts of America because of the Boy Scouts’ explicitly discriminatory policies against LGBTQ people.

Based upon our tradition of upholding human rights and rejecting bigotry, Los Angeles now has the opportunity to do the right thing once again by ending its relationship with Veolia and choosing instead to contract with a company that does not willingly and routinely discriminate against passengers based on their ethnicity or religion.

As people of Abrahamic faiths and tax-paying Angelenos, we call on the Los Angeles City Council to join Stockholm, Melbourne, Bordeaux, Dublin and the many other cities around the world refusing to contract with Veolia because of its participation in discriminatory, segregationist practices.

NY state senator David Storobin’s office: ‘Visitors [to the Israeli/Syrian border] are required to don a uniform and carry a gun’

Aug 17, 2012

Adam Horowitz

Storobin and his chief of staff
NY State Senator Storobin (l) with an Israeli general, center, and the senator’s chief of staff (r)

New York state senator David Storobin’s office responded today to criticism over the senator carrying a weapon and wearing an IDF uniform in the occupied Golan Heights, on the Syrian border.

Storobin aide Steven Stites emailed:

The ginned-up controversy about the Senator’s photo on the Syrian border is quite amusing, especially to folks who have been to Israel.

As Israelis know all too well, the Syrian border is a hostile area. Visitors there are required to don a uniform and carry a gun. Even members of the Knesset do so. There are snipers on the other side. If they see an unarmed person not in uniform, they may assume it’s a leader of some kind, and that person could be a target.

This claim from Storobin’s office seems to have no basis in fact. Israeli journalist Joseph Dana was just on the Syrian border and says:

This is all insane. I have no idea what area he is talking about in fact. I mean, I was just there. Five meters from the border and everything was very calm. Of course, the other side of the border was being shelled. There were Israeli Jews and Druze all around, watching what was happening over in Syria.

This guy seems to be talking about a different place entirely.

I contacted Stites for more information and he says the IDF advised Storobin to carry a weapon and wear an Israeli military uniform. Stites wrote in an email:

They were urged to do so as a matter of safety. As to whether it’s a requirement, I’m not sure, though that’s the impression I got. I can say that if I was told to do something like that for my own safety, I’d do it — wouldn’t you?

We will follow up to confirm this with the IDF.

‘Al Jazeera’ reports Syrian regime committed Houla massacre in effort to ignite sectarian conflict

Aug 17, 2012

Philip Weiss

Over at Pulse, Idrees Ahmad points me to an Al Jazeera investigation by Mahmoud Al Ken into the Houla massacre near Homs, Syria, last May that confirms the original report that the murders of 108 villagers were carried out by Syrian government forces. Writes Pulse:

There is no reason why official stories shouldn’t be doubted, but given the heinous nature of the crime, one would’ve thought they’d be careful with regard to their evidence. As it happened, all of them were relying on a single article appearing in a German publication, written by an author who never visited Houla or met a survivor. This was no innocent mistake: it was pointed out to both Medialens and FAIR that their source was dubious and its claim highly questionable. The source was discredited soon afterwards, and Der Spiegel and the UN have since both confirmed the original reports. Neither Medialens nor FAIR has apologized.

Below is the Al Jazeera piece. Beautifully done, the kind of journalism it’s hard to put down once you start. It begins, Our Friday demonstration on May 25 was met by Assad tanks. The several men interviewed from 3:30 to 5:40 or so are genuine and persuasive, and the massacre house testimony from a brother of victims at 7:30 is also compelling. And the nighttime movement of the bodies, described by a villager, at 8:45, rivetting. The traumatized woman at 9:40: stunning.

Some of these people are very brave to come forward. The elder male witness at 10:30-11– great reporting.

And most important, please watch the highly-articulate clerical figure speaking at 13:52, saying that the purpose of the massacre was to ignite a sectarian conflict in an area of mixed Sunni and Alawite villages.

‘Today I saw a lynch with my own eyes, in Zion Square, in the center of Jerusalem’

Aug 17, 2012

Annie Robbins

Jerusalem 2012. The account first appeared on Facebook in Hebrew. Translated by Haaretz:

Dozens of Jewish youths attacked three young Palestinians in Jerusalem’s Zion Square early on Friday morning, in what one witness described as “a lynch” on Facebook.

…….

The three were allegedly attacked by youths shouting “Death to the Arabs” at them, as well as other racial slurs. One of them fell on the floor, and his attackers continued to beat him until he lost consciousness. They subsequently fled from the scene.

Within a short period of time rescue volunteers and Magen David Adom rescue services arrived on the scene, and found the victim with no pulse and not breathing. After a lengthy resuscitation attempt, he was transferred to hospital.

Writing on her Facebook page, one eye witness decribed the attack as a lynch: “Its late at night, and I can’t sleep. My eyes are full of tears for a good few hours now and my stomach is turning inside out with the question of the loss of humanity, the image of God in mankind, a loss that I am not willing to accept.”

“But today I saw a lynch with my own eyes, in Zion Square, the center of the city of Jerusalem ….. and shouts of ‘A Jew is a soul and Arab is a son of a –,’ were shouted loudly and dozens (!!) of youths ran and gathered and started to really beat to death three Arab youths who were walking quietly in the Ben Yehuda street,” the witness wrote.

“When one of the Palestinian youths fell to the floor, the youths continued to hit him in the head, he lost consciousness, his eyes rolled, his angled head twitched, and then those who were kicking him fled and the rest gathered in a circle around, with some still shouting with hate in their eyes.”

“When two volunteers [from local charities] went into the circle, they tried to perform CPR the mass of youths standing around started to say resentfully that we are resuscitating an Arab, and when they passed near us and saw that the rest of the volunteers were shocked, they asked why we were so in shock, he is an Arab.

Mairav Zonszein has an account here. (Hat tip MW commenter Taxi)

B’nai B’rith and World Jewish Congress defend settlements as ‘Israel’

Aug 17, 2012

Philip Weiss

The United Church of Canada has voted to boycott settlement products. Below are two responses from Jewish community organizations. Both say that the United Church is threatening interfaith harmony; and both describe the settlements as Israel. 
First, the World Jewish Congress:
NEW YORK… The World Jewish Congress strongly condemns the outrageous   decision taken by the United Church of Canada to support a boycott of Israeli communities and for its stated regret for previously calling for Palestinian recognition of Israel’s Jewish character…. 

Evelyn Sommer, Chair, World Jewish Congress, North America, said… “The leaders of the UCC have made an unfortunate decision that denies the facts of the Jewish people’s historical presence in their homeland…”

B’nai B’rith Canada:

B’nai Brith Canada has condemned recommendations passed by the United Church of Canada today that lay the groundwork for the boycott of products from Jewish communities in Biblical Israel. The final vote to approve and actualize this boycott is expected on Friday.

Frank Dimant, CEO of B’nai Brith Canada, issued the following statement:

“At a time when thousands of Syrian citizens are being slaughtered, we find this obsession with the Jewish State highly suspect. The subtext of these recommendations is that Jews cannot legitimately establish working communities in Biblical Israel – this is a first step towards calling for ethnic cleansing of Jews from these areas.”

Muslims in wealthy Detroit suburb seek a mosque (and friends join them to fight the bigotry)

Aug 17, 2012

Barbara Harvey

The public turnout for the projected conversion of an existing closed public school building, slated for demolition, into a private cultural center, school, and mosque was announced by the Planning Commission to be the largest ever in its history.  The place was West Bloomfield Township, Michigan, a western suburb of Detroit that is (or was, until the recent crash) the wealthiest community in the U.S.  Attendance was about 250 – 275. It was mostly elderly, and many of them were Jewish.  There was a good turnout from the local Muslim community.  Media turnout was heavy.

The first half of the meeting was about drainage for the site – boring and interminable — it seemed deliberately so.  That part of the meeting ended at about 8:15, and most people left, mistakenly thinking that the meeting was over.  But it was just a warm-up for the nitty-gritty second half, about usage, building design, and financing.
The head of the purchaser organization, the Islamic Cultural Association (“ICA”), spoke: a gentle, humble physician, whose presentation was powerful, especially as given in his soft and humble style, factually detailed, and well prepared.  Nevertheless, there were audience members who could not resist their urge to express hostility in the form of derisive laughter at some of his plainly reasonable and rational answers to questions. His explanation that funding for the anticipated $5 – 6 million project would come from private donations was met with a roar of laughter.  Church construction projects are commonly funded this way, but for many, he had just confirmed that the project would be funded by unidentified foreign terrorist groups.
The ICA representative explained that the ICA is a Muslim community of 150 members, that has been an active presence in the prosperous communities of Franklin, West Bloomfield, and Farmington Hills for the past 30 years.  He personally has been active in the community for the past 20 years.  Most of its members are doctors, like himself.  They have always had to rely on the goodness of other Muslim congregations to worship, and they’ve rented YMCA space for special events.  They want their own space for prayer, classes, and cultural events, in their community, and have a right to find an appropriate place.  Notably, while the Muslim population of Oakland County exceeds the Jewish population by a substantial margin, there are eight synagogues in West Bloomfield Township, alone.  In fact, the current voting place for this mosque and school will be a synagogue in the same precinct.  This will be West Bloomfield’s first mosque.For me, the most telling moment followed an impassioned, powerful, and eloquent statement by a man who identified himself as a Jew who lives in West Bloomfield.  He vigorously condemned the bigotry of the questions, as a Jew who remembered anti-Semitism firsthand, and emphasized, as we did in our joint statement [see ecumenical statement below], that diversity in the community should be welcomed and celebrated, for the new vigor and richness that it brings to local culture.

What I found so telling is that his remarks were the ONLY remarks that received spontaneous audience applause.  This grateful outburst signified to me that, although the overwhelming number of public comments were complaints and whining about small details of the project, a significantly large silent presence there was disgusted by what they were hearing.
Status:  No vote was taken.  They’re going to spin this out for a while.  A “walk through” of the property, for public understanding of the drainage issue (!), will be held in about a month.  Note that the prior user of the property, a public school, made no provision at all for drainage, while the new owner has done so.  The matter will next be heard at an October 23 commission meeting.  By putting off the next discussion until then, the Commission finessed a subject of major controversy in this tempest in a teapot: whether to grant the ICA a temporary occupancy permit before resolution of an appeal in a pending lawsuit that apparently challenges the ICA’s ownership, on the ground that it bought the property under another name.  The oral argument in that case is set for Sept. 12th.  This temporary occupancy controversy revolves around fears — expressed at one point by one of the Commissioners — that “once we allow them onto the property, we’ll never be able to get them out.”
Indeed, hostile questions were asked by four of the seven commissioners.Nevertheless, the Commissioners ran a fair and patient hearing, making sure every commentator had access to the mike.  They publicly announced — at the outset of the hearing, when the attendance was greatest — that two letters had been  received, both in favor of the project: our joint statement and another from the Maurice Sugar Law Center for Social and Economic Justice.

Names of all signatory organizations to our joint statement were slowly read aloud.  You could hear a pin drop.  The list represents an impressive cross section of the religious community:  the Detroit Meeting of Friends (Quakers), Jewish Voice for Peace-Detroit Chapter, Michigan Coalition for Human Rights, Michigan Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Network, Pax Christi Michigan State Council, [Grosse] Pointes for Peace, and the Unitarian Universalists for Justice in the Middle East.

Exile and the Prophetic: BGS/BDS — It’s never easy on the Jewish front

Aug 17, 2012

Marc H. Ellis

This post is part of Marc H. Ellis’s “Exile and the Prophetic” feature for Mondoweiss. To read the entire series visit the archive page.

False alarm, in fact, perhaps just the opposite. In German, I found a short history of the place here and, translated, it seems that the Hitler Youth wanted to occupy the premises but the owner resisted. The reason for the resistance – unstated. It could have been for a variety of reasons, including opposition to the Nazis themselves. It may have been about money or just about this rural ideal being overrun by an institutional juggernaut. More research needed.

The lesson here is not to jump to conclusions. Also, every inch of Austria’s soil is infected with the possibility of the Nazis occupying. From outside to home grown. This is why the German and Austrian children of a certain age didn’t quite know what was up with their parents, now grandparents and beyond. Where were they during the Nazi period? What were they involved in? Were they or their parents supporters of the Nazis?

Questions for the Jewish future. Where were your parents or grandparents doing as the Palestinians were be ethnically cleansed from the land in 1948 and beyond? Those Jews who think that we are exempt from the questioning of our heirs have already missed the Jewish prophetic boat. It’s out there on the high seas.

On the dancing front, interesting understandings shared at breakfast about how the dances now begin with your own grounding. No words to the songs or at least little that means anything, then you dance in a group, only fleetingly locking eyes or steps with another. This is the no risk approach to dancing, since you can’t be accused of exclusivity or be rejected, so nothing personal is involved. No personal history or commitment either?

Those of us at a certain age know how complex our personal histories and commitments are. Sometimes, we or others with us would like to abandon both. Nonetheless, the lack of foundation on the public front is connected to the lack of foundations in individual lives. Uprooting in one arena affects uprooting in others. This is the real problematic in the virtual world we increasingly inhabit. Our connection with the outside/inside is assumed without reflection unless we are (un)plugged.

(Un)Plugged, the world careens out of our control. (Un)Plugged, we have difficulty adjusting to the glare of the real world. If we don’t know what the outside world is, how can we cope when we are confronted with that world?

Our control and the Israel/Palestine stalemate. The challenge is to (un)plug our control, which, if you’ve noticed, isn’t controlled by us or sometimes by anyone, so it seems. Syria going down is just another example of not having predicted what would happen and the players are so many representing such diverse interests, almost none of them having to do with ordinary Syrians at all, God only knows where the wind will blow once the dictator dynasty falls by the wayside of history. Like Mubarak but with much, much more violence.

Falling dictatorships. The world is replete with them. Now take off your Israel is a democracy hat and think of Israel from a Palestinian perspective. Call it what you will from the Jewish side and its international recognition, Israel is a fascist force – for Palestinians. Israeli fascism – shall I call it Jewish fascism since Jews all over the world enable Israel? – needs to take a hike. But where?

In my small group yesterday, some students couldn’t wrap their mind around David Ben Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel, recognized as a liberal leading light in the world of his times while ethnically cleansing Palestinians. Could a liberal do such things and still be a liberal?

More or less, around the tables, the answer was no – he couldn’t be both. But since he was – my view – we have to reorient our view of – liberal fascism. I don’t mean this in the sense that it was fashionably applied to the United States some decades ago, and look how far we have come since that time, becoming at least a surveillance, if not a police state. A national security state, another nomenclature bandied around some time ago. Again, how far we have come in the last decades.

Israel has been and is a liberal venture. Netanyahu is not a right-wing fascist on most matters (un)pertaining to the Palestinians. Call him an Israeli expansionist but, then, every Israeli Prime Minister has been so. In this regard there is no difference between Ben Gurion, Rabin, Sharon and Netanyahu. The Apartheid Wall was built when the state of Israel was formed. It just took a long time to construct it.

It takes a village to raise a child, returning to our Hillary Clinton theme. It takes a state to build an Apartheid Wall. An ideology can’t do it – without a state. Even the focus on the Promised Land can’t do it – without a state. Can a homeland focus, a la Martin Buber, Judah Magnes and Hannah Arendt, undo the state and thus the Apartheid Wall? I doubt it, but then again the One State vision won’t do it either. Joining forces, Homeland Zionists and One State visionaries? Doubt it too.

I suppose if we simply accept that no matter what position we take it won’t be enough separately or together, then we can focus on the task at hand which is to end the oppression of the Palestinian people. Of course, that won’t do it either. We are back at square one.

You see the problem is what we might call the Ben Gurion Syndrome (BGS). Liberal to the world, fascist to the Palestinians. We can’t say that the BGS is impossible since, to some extent, it survives today. American Jewish support for Israel isn’t fascist, not even close, except in its policies toward Palestinians. Elie Wiesel a fascist? No way.

To call the Jewish establishment fascist is a misnomer, way too easy and wrong. Though, if I step outside of my context, for Palestinians the BGS is what it is. Why beat around the liberal/fascist dichotomy bush?

BGS like a mountain’s narrow wooden bridge; it’s dangerous to cross. The winds are too strong and it’s single file with one foot in front of the other; darkness is coming soon. We have to get across to the other side before darkness falls. To make it across, we have to forge ahead.

Jews of Conscience in exile. We have never been able to explain how a suffering and progressive people can do/enable the things that are going on in Israel/Palestine.

It would be easier if the Jewish establishment sent their kids to the Hitler Youth camps of our time. Then things would become so obvious the world couldn’t look away. Sure?

Caught in the horns of the liberal/fascist dilemma. Thicket. Abraham and Isaac time. Untangling trust and fidelity can occupy interpreters for thousands of years. As with Job, where the return of wealth and children is Biblical add-on, a late redactive act.

BGS is one tangle. The anti-Semitism I encountered in the European BDS movement is another tangle. There we have the reverse of liberal/fascist. Or more accurately, we have the liberation of Palestinians without any sign of respecting Jews. Liberal/anti-Semitism. How is that going to work out?

You remember I reported on my time in Ireland and Scotland a few years ago. The few who showed up for my lecture in Ireland were openly hostile to anything Jewish being said and the then director of the Irish section – well he couldn’t say the word “Holocaust” or “Israel” when I had tea and dinner with him. I doubt it had to do with a speech impediment. The Scotland director, too, could hardly say “Jew” without a bite. Strange days, I thought. I was uncomfortable not on their Palestine stance, not at all. And I wasn’t retreating to the Progressive Jewish stance, the Michael Lerner two-step that says I’ll hold you if you love Israel true.

Also their distortion of Ilan Pappe’s works and the whole Israelis-in-exile crew, their “good” friends as they reported to me. Don’t know whether the friendship thing is true and it certainly isn’t a credential for me if they’re talking out of both sides of their mouths. Pappe is serious historian, an Israeli and a Jew. He has gone far out on a limb, with safety concerns galore. There’s no reason to impute an intentional genocide claim, that Pappe doesn’t make, as substitute for a calculated “Israel is for Jews only” claim that he does make. To some the difference might seem too subtle for public discourse. It is important.

When the political anger takes us too far, soon the cliff is in view. If we jump over the cliff, where do we land?

Because, you see, when it comes to Jews, the baggage can easily get mixed up – history knocks at our door. Sure it’s complicated. But revving up negative comments about Jews is dangerous and stupid. Call me what you will, there’s no way I am going to be silent about it. Especially when I hear it in Europe. Why go that way when it only means distorting everything?

Yes, a few, and I am a supporter of BDS, simply remark on the few because it tangles me up in blue. As with Ben Gurion.

A few do not make a whole. It does not give Jews a reason to retreat. BDS is the symbolic right way to a real difference. Nonetheless the screening process for those attracted to Jewish issues is almost impossible. We have to struggle with it and keep moving forward.

History’s baggage on the Jewish front. It might be easy for my student to say that the contradiction of liberal and fascist is impossible since the act of ethnic cleansing defines all. But how does he judge the anti-Semite committed to wiping out – the injustice of – the Jews?

Perhaps easier to deal with the Global Warming warning of mass death. You can’t be on both sides of that debate, can you?

Bloomberg says Israel lobby is ‘blackmail’-ing US gov’t to support Iran strike, but Times is clueless

Aug 17, 2012

Philip Weiss

Bloomberg editorial lays it on the line: Israel is threatening to attack Iran because it has the upper hand on the US government during the election season, because of Jewish “donors,” among other factors, and can therefore compel American complicity in such a disastrous move.

Israeli officials are warning they might have to launch an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, perhaps even before the U.S. presidential election in November. …

What is the sudden urgency?… If Israel is about to attack Iran (and this time the threats are backed up by distribution of gas masks and other civil defense preparations), then using the campaign season to pull in the U.S. makes tactical sense. Neither President Barack Obama nor Republican candidate Mitt Romney would want to alienate Jewish or evangelical Christian voters and donors by failing to support Israel. But it would also damage Israel’s most important strategic partnership. Nobody likes getting blackmailed.

The threats could, of course, be another bluff, designed to pressure the U.S. and Europe into quickly putting in place tougher sanctions. If so, that seems unwise, too. After so many unfulfilled warnings of an imminent attack on Iran, Israel’s credibility is eroding, not to mention the destabilizing effect on oil and other global markets.

Isabel Kershner at the New York Times certainly knows about blackmail. She writes that Israel wants to strike before November, “while Israel’s limited military capabilities might still have an impact.”

The president [Shimon Peres’s anti-war] comments came amid a wave of speculation in Israel and abroad that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his defense minister, Ehud Barak, might be weighing the option of a unilateral strike even before the American presidential elections in November, while Israel’s limited military capabilities might still have an impact.

But what does this mean? Why would Israeli threat of a strike have “impact” before the election season? Well, because the Israel lobby has a lot of sway over Obama now, and a lot less come November. But the Times can’t go where Bloomberg goes.

Note that even John Hannah, a neoconservative at Foreign Policy, can talk about the power of the Israel lobby to pave the way in the election season for a strike:

Could [a strike] come before November’s elections in the U.S.? The Israelis I asked were strident in emphasizing that a move of such national importance would be based entirely on Israeli security interests and the state of Iran’s nuclear program, not America’s electoral calendar. But when pushed, a few reluctantly acknowledged that securing maximum U.S. support for Israeli military action would be an important variable. And there’s no doubt that many further believe that, all else being equal, securing the full-throated backing of the Obama administration is far more likely before an overwhelmingly pro-Israel American electorate goes to the polls than afterwards.

As if the American electorate is dying for another war! But the Times can’t address the real forces at work here. It has an editorial called, In Thrall to Sheldon Adelson, that essentially deceives a reader about Adelson’s real interest. It says that Paul Ryan and Mitt Romney are going to be beholden to Adelson’s gambling interests in Macao.

Does anyone really believe this is Adelson’s game? Adelson is pro-choice. Do you think that matters to Paul Ryan?

The Times is less honest about the Israel lobby than Newt Gingrich, Adelson’s last pony.

“He knows I’m very pro-Israel, and that’s the central value of his life,” Gingrich told NBC News back in January. “He’s very worried that Israel is going to not survive.”

Reminder: we’re talking about war. We’re talking about something that could devastate hundreds of thousands of people. And our political system can’t be honest about what’s going on? Writes a friend: If there’s an attack between now and the elections it will be incontrovertible proof of a dysfunctional political system here and in Israel. The question then will be whether Americans will do anything about it. I’d like to think so but rather doubt it with most of our news media mindlessly and “patriotically” stoking the hysteria. I do think  a greater percentage of Americans will see the problem than ever.

Good posture makes all the difference
Aug 17, 2012

Michael Levin

Good Posture Poster

At an anti-demolition protest in Susiya [South Hebron], June, 2012.  For more information about Susiya see the blog “Susiya Forever, Stop the demolitions in Susiya” — http://susiyaforever.wordpress.com.

Posted in Nova NewsletterComments Off on Mondoweiss Online Newsletter

Shoah’s pages

www.shoah.org.uk

KEEP SHOAH UP AND RUNNING