Archive | June 18th, 2014

The ISIS Ploy: Illuminati Sorcery and Sacrifice



by Zen Gardner

It’s rather ironic that this latest wave of Western armed and financed “Islamic” militants invading Iraq and now conveniently threatening Syria and Iran is named ISIS. Or is it deliberate? It’s being used to stand for this oddly anglicised fabricated “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria” full on barbaric movement presently sweeping Iraq, but anyone acquainted with any degree of occult knowledge or esoteric mythology know the goddess Isis is one of the most important figures in the so-called mystery schools and a favorite of Freemasonry and the Illuminati.

And for many very dark reasons for which they have manipulated, murdered and thoroughly deceived humanity for millennia.

While the US is currently once again self-appointedly deciding whether to go into all out overt war on this entire region from Lebanon to Iran based on this “unforeseen phenomenon”, this parasitic plan goes on full throttle, ripping the guts out of millions of innocent people’s lives for the Machiavellian desires of a few. All while they hoodwink the masses into a completely backwards interpretation of their devious sorcery.

These “elite” few are fueled by something besides their psychopathy – it’s an occult allegiance to powerful symbolic entities, whether they are all fully conscious of their allegiances to these powers or not. Such is the case of most of manipulated humanity.

Isis and the Illuminati

It’s important to know that almost every portrayal of a feminine goddess, a specialty of Freemasonic art, literature and architecture, hails back to Isis, no matter whether it’s called “The Statue of Liberty”, “Blind Justice”, “Mother Mary”, “Columbia” or some other “Queen of Heaven” or whatever label they want to give her. They’re almost all the same entity. Isis in turn goes back to Sumer and the goddess Semiramis, or Ishtar, an embodiment of this same esoteric deity.

She was/is considered the goddess of enchantment and magic. Married to her brother Osiris, the two of whom then gave birth to the infamous Horus, all major characters in the play, she wandered looking for the dismembered penis of her former husband “wailing and moaning like the wind”. Hence the world “crown capitals” of Washington DC, the City of London and the Vatican all boasting phallic obelisks in this memory, as well as many other major financial and political energy centers.

The true worldly “powers that be” are beholden to other “Powers that Be” that are not so worldly. This may need more research and validation on your part but for me and many other researchers it is very evident. When this becomes apparent, reading into the symbols and embedded images and language of our carefully created culture becomes a much easier and even every day task.

At that point it may become a bit overwhelming but don’t let it be, it’s been there all the time, we just didn’t see it.

The Illuminati is actually a rather flimsy label considering all we know about the workings of these dark occult driven psychopaths. Their derivation is not as important as their current effects on humanity, but understanding their roots gives light to their intentions. That being said, here’s a quote on their roots, tying them into Isis worship and obeisance.

“Power” is not all that meets the eye.

“Popular history texts and encyclopedias generally paint the Illuminati as having its origins in 1776 Bavaria. However, the origins go back much further. The Illuminati are tied directly through masonry to the sun and Isis cults of ancient Egypt. Killing was a mystical experience to this branch of the Mystery Schools. They not only maintained their control by murder and threats of murder, they believed that the assassin could acquire the gnosis, or soul energy from the victim. This is the theory behind the human and animal sacrifices of Satanists throughout history (and the ritual child abuse etc). Satanists believe that sacrifices release more of it than anything else. Such are the dark and sordid machinations of the deluded souls who think their gnosis accumulations and illumination will give them some form of deity or immortality. . .” (source)

That’s just a quick glimpse. Research for yourself and learn much more. Massive casualties and deaths turn them on. As it does for those controlling them behind the scenes both here and inter-dimensionally.

You’ll find this energy vampirism throughout any esoteric studies on this subject, popularized by the Matrix movies where humans are considered energy “batteries” to be drained and utilized. That’s pretty much what they’re up to.

Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi – Leader of ISIS

By the way, as far a manipulating the Arab masses, the choice of the supposed leader’s name of these high financed and western trained pre-positioned rogue forces is Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi. This name couldn’t be any more incendiary.

The schism between Sunni and Shia Muslims lies in disputes over who would succeed Muhammad as leader of the faithful after his death in 632. The Shiites thought the prophet’s son-in-law and cousin should lead as caliph, particularly given his blood relationship to Muhammad. Their opponents, the Sunnis, thought Abu Bakr, one of Mohammad’s first converts, should be their leader.

The Shiites lost a series of wars for power in the early years of Islam and today are the clear minority in global Islam, making up about 15 percent of adherents. They are in the majority in Iraq and Iran. (source)

No mere coincidence there.

More, emphasis added:

After Mohammed died (632), an assembly of Moslems in Mecca elected Abu Bakr as the first ‘khalifat rasul Allah’ (successor of the Prophet of God), or caliph.

Under him the collection of Mohammed’s revelations was recorded in the Koran. Abu Bakr suppressed tribal uprisings and brought central Arabia under Moslem control, after which he directed Arab armies into Iraq and Syria initiating thus the Moslem conquests. (source)

And Al Baghdadi? Clearly an affirmation of their intent to take over the capital and subdue all of Iraq. All of this cleverly engineered, any way you look at it.

Posted in IraqComments Off on The ISIS Ploy: Illuminati Sorcery and Sacrifice

The Depth of the Conspiracy Against the Arabs ”Arabic”

كتاب تحليلي – الأب الياس زحلاوي
أحيّيكم، أنّى كنتم، وأيّاً كنتم، وأيّاً كان موقفكم ممّا يجري في سورية.
قد يكون بعضكم، هنا وهناك، قرأ بعض ما رأيت أن أكتب لهذا أو ذاك، من مسؤولي الغرب، دولاً وكنائس، منذ عشرات السنين.
إلاّ أني اليوم أترك الكلام لسواي، ممّن كتبوا من زمان بعيد، ومن زمان قريب، مما له علاقة مباشرة، أو غير مباشرة، بما يجري في سورية.
كل ما أرجوه ألاّ تهملوا هذه النصوص، تحت أيّ مسوّغ، فقد تحمل ضوءاً كاشفاً، أو ربما جديداً بالكليّة، لما قد تكون تساؤلات مضنية، أو ربما قناعات راسخة، لدى الكثيرين.
هذه النصوص خمسة. وسأحرص بالطبع على ذكر كتّابها ضمن المراجع التي جاءت فيها، بكل أمانة.
سأوردها بتسلسلها الزمني، دون أي تعليق.
إلاّ أني، قبل ذلك، أريد أن أؤكد لكم أني، إذ أكتب، لا أفعل، كما هي حالي دائماً، إلا بوحيٍ من ذاتي.

أوّل هذه النصوص، وضعه كاتب لبناني مغمور، يدعى نجيب عازوري. وقد جاء في مطلع كتاب له، نشره في باريس عام 1905، باللغة الفرنسية، ولم يترجم إلى العربية، إلا عام 1948، تحت عنوان “يقظة الأمة العربية”. وهو يقول منذ السطر الأول في هذا الكتاب، ما حرفيته:
« إنّ ظاهرتين هامتين، متشابهتي الطبيعة، بيد أنهما متعارضتان، لم تجذبا انتباه أحد حتى الآن، تتّضحان في هذه الآونة، في تركيا الآسيوية، أعني: يقظة الأمة العربية، وجهد اليهود الخفي، لإعادة تكوين مملكة إسرائيل القديمة على نطاق واسع. ومصير هاتين الحركتين هو أن تتعاركا باستمرار حتى تنتصر إحداهما على الأخرى وبالنتيجة النهائية لهذا الصراع، بين هذين الشعبين اللذين يمثّلان مبدأين متضاربين، يتعلق مصير العالم بأسره…» (انتهى)

ثاني هذه النصوص، جاء في رسالة كتبها “بن غوريون” بتاريخ 27/2/1954، إلى رئيس وزراء إسرائيل آنذاك، “موشيه شاريت”، يقول له فيها، في ما يقول:
« من الممكن أن يكون الوقت الراهن، مؤاتياً للسعي من أجل خلق دولة مسيحية بجوارنا. إلا أن ذلك لن يحدث دون مبادرتنا ومساعدتنا. وأنا أعتقد أن هذه هي مهمّتنا الأساسية حالياً، أو، على الأقلّ، إحدى المهام الأساسية لسياستنا الخارجية. ويتوجّب علينا أن نبذل، من الوسائل والوقت والطاقة، ما مِن شأنه أن يُحدث هذا التغيير الأساسي في لبنان.
ولا يهمّكم أمر الدولارات، حتى لو بدا أن الأموال أُنفقت دون طائل.
يجب علينا أن نركّز جميع قِوانا على هذا الهدف.
لست أدري ما إذا كان لنا عُملاء في لبنان، ولكن استخدِموا جميع الوسائل المتاحة، لإنجاز المحاولة التي اقترحها… » (انتهى)

ثالث هذه النصوص، جاء في مجلة صهيونية تصدر في القدس، وتحمل اسم “كيفونيم” (أي التوجّه)، وهو في عدد شهر شباط من عام 1982، تحت عنوان “استراتيجيّة إسرائيل في الثمانينيّات”، وهو بقلم “عوديد اينون”. وقد اخترت لكم منه بضع فقرات، أذكرها بالحرف الواحد. جاء فيه:
« إن إعادة احتلال سيناء، لِما فيها من موارد طبيعية، هي من أولويّاتنا الكبرى.
“إن مصر، بفعل نزاعاتها الداخلية، لم تعُد تشكّل، بالنسبة إلينا، مسألة إستراتيجية. وإنه لَيمكننا إعادتها في أقلّ من 24 ساعة، إلى الوضع الذي وجدَت فيه نفسها، بعد حرب حزيران 1967. أما أسطورة مصر “رائدة العالم العربي”، فلقد ماتت وانتهت. ومصر اليوم هي جثّة… وتقسيمها إلى مناطق جغرافية مستقلّة، يجب أن يكون هدفنا السياسي في التسعينيات.
“ومتى تمّ تفكيك مصر على هذا النحو، فإن بلداناً مثل ليبيا والسودان، وبلداناً أخرى أكثر بُعداً، ستواجه التفكيك ذاته.
“… إن الجبهة الغربية تواجه مشاكل دون الجبهة الشرقية. فإن تقسيم لبنان إلى خمس ولايات، هو الصورة المسبقة لِما سيحلّ بمجمل العالم العربي. وإن تفجير سورية والعراق إلى مناطق محددة، وفقاً لمعايير إثنية أو دينية، يجب أن يكون، على المدى البعيد، هدفاً أولياً لإسرائيل…
“إن شبه الجزيرة العربية كلها، مدعوّة للانحلال ذاته، تحت الضغوط الداخلية. وذلك هو، على نحو خاص، وضع العربية السعودية…
“والأردن هو هدف إستراتيجي راهن لنا، وهو، على المدى البعيد، لن يشكّل تهديداً لنا، بعد انحلاله، ورحيل الملك حسين، وانتقال السلطات إلى أيدي الغالبية الفلسطينية…
“هذا ما يجب أن ترمي إليه السياسة الإسرائيلية، وهذا التغيير سيعني الحل لمسألة الضفة الغربية، ذات الكثافة السكانية العربية الكبيرة…
“يجب علينا أن نرفض خطة الدولة المستقلة، وأية خطة تنطوي على مساومة أو اقتسام للأراضي، يحول دون فصل القوميتين…
“وعلى العرب الإسرائيليين أن يدركوا أنه لن يكون لهم وطن إلا في الأردن… وأنهم لن ينعموا بالأمن، ما لم يعترفوا بالسيادة اليهودية بين البحر والنهر…
“لم يعُد ممكناً، ونحن في مداخل الزمن النووي، أن نقبل بأن يكون ثلاثة أرباع السكان اليهود مجموعين في ساحلٍ كثيف السكان، وعُرضة للمخاطر بحكم طبيعته. وإن تهجير هؤلاء السكان ضرورة قصوى، بالنسبة إلى سياستنا الداخلية. فإن اليهودية والسامرة والجليل، تشكّل الضمانات الوحيدة لبقائنا القومي. فإنْ لم نصبح نحن الغالبية في المناطق الجبلية، فإننا سنتعرض لمصير الصليبيين الذين خسروا البلد…
“إن إعادة توازن المنطقة على الأصعدة الديموغرافية والإستراتيجية والاقتصادية، يجب أن تكون في طليعة طموحاتنا… » (انتهى)

رابع هذه النصوص هو لكاتب أميركي، يهودي، معروف، يدعى “نعوم تشومسكي”، وإني لأختاره من كتاب له أخذ طابع حوار أجراه صحفي إسرائيلي يدعى “ستيفن شالوم”، معه ومع باحث فرنسي، من أصل لبناني، يدعى “جلبير أشقر”. وقد نشر الكتاب باللغة الانكليزية في لندن، عام 2007، تحت عنوان “القوة الخطرة”، ثم نشر في ترجمته الفرنسية في مدينة مونتريال بكندا، تحت عنوان “بركان الشرق الأوسط”. وإني لأختار فقرات هذا النص، بحرفيتها، ممّا جاء في الترجمة الفرنسية، في الصفحتين 184-185:
« شالوم: ثمة كلام عن احتمال قيام عمل عسكري من قبل الولايات المتحدة، ضد بلدين آخرين في الشرق الأدنى، هما سورية وإيران. كيف لك أن تقيِّم سياسة الولايات المتحدة حيال سورية؟
تشومسكي: سياسة الولايات المتحدة حيال سورية، كانت دائماً انتهازية جداً… في عام 1990، كان جورج بوش الأب يؤيد كل التأييد بقاء سورية في لبنان، لأنه كان يريد لها أن تنضم إلى التحالف المعادي للعراق… إلا أن واشنطن عادت عبر السنوات، إلى موقف مختلف، لأن سورية لا تخضع لأوامر واشنطن… ففي معظم البلدان، ينحني المسؤولون أمام الولايات المتحدة بكل بساطة. أما سورية، فلا. ولكي نرى مدى جدية انتقاد الولايات المتحدة لسورية، بشأن خروقها لحقوق الإنسان، حسبنا أن نلقي نظرة على تاريخ الأحداث، وفي الواقع، هناك قائمة بدول داعمة للإرهاب، أي دول هي، في حقيقة الأمر، لا تُرضي الولايات المتحدة، لسبب تافه. من ذلك، أن كلينتون عرض على سورية، عام 1994، أن يشطب اسمها من هذه القائمة، إن هي قبلت بالاقتراحات “الأميركية – الإسرائلية” (كذا!) بشأن هضبة الجولان، التي كانت إسرائيل قد احتلتها أثناء حرب عام 1967. ولما كانت سورية تريد استرداد أرضها، رفضت هذه المقايضة، فبقيت إذن في قائمة الدول الداعمة للإرهاب. ولا يحتاج الأمر إلى المزيد من الكلام بشأن هذا الموضوع.
وفي عام 2004، توفرت فرصة للتخلص من سورية. فاتفق المسؤولون في الولايات المتحدة مع فرنسا، وفرضوا على الأمم المتحدة قراراً يقضي بإرغام القوات السورية على مغادرة لبنان. واليوم تمارس الولايات المتحدة ضغوطاً قوية للإطاحة بالنظام السوري، ولكن لا للأسباب التي تدّعيها الولايات المتحدة. إن دافعها الحقيقي هو الدافع عينه الذي استخدمته في قصف صربيا: لأنها غير مطيعة!…
إن الأسباب التي تدفع الولايات المتحدة إلى معارضة سورية، ليست نبيلة البتة. ويسعنا أن نقول الأمر نفسه عن فرنسا، بقدر ما يتاح لي أن أعرب عن رأيي. إن ما دفع الولايات المتحدة بإصرار لإخراج سورية من لبنان، يعود إلى أن سورية رفضت الانضمام إلى الحرب الثانية التي شنت على العراق عام 2003، بل تبنّت، بالمقابل، موقفاً معادياً… ولذلك قررت الولايات المتحدة معاقبة النظام السوري. » (انتهى)

خامس هذه النصوص وآخرها، هو لباحث سويسري، يدعى “جان زيغلر”، كان قد شغل لسنوات طويلة، مركز المستشار الاقتصادي لأمين عام الأمم المتحدة. هذا النص، أستلّه من كتاب له صدر عام 2007، باللغة الفرنسية، تحت عنوان “إمبراطورية العار”، وقد جاء فيه في طبعته الجديدة، في سلسلة “كتاب الجيب”، في الصفحتين (16-18)، بالحرف الواحد:
« في إمبراطورية العار، التي تحكمها سياسة التجويع المنظّم، لم تعُد الحرب حالة طارئة، بل هي حالة دائمة، وهي لا تشكّل أزمة وحالة مرحلية، بل وضعاً طبيعياً. وهي لم تعُد تُعتبر تغييباً للعقل، بل هي مبرر وجود هذه الإمبراطورية بالذات. فإن سادة الحرب الاقتصادية قد أخضعوا الأرض كلها لتقسيم مدروس: فهم يهاجمون السلطة الناظمة للدول، ويشككون في سيادة الشعوب، ويُفسدون الديمقراطيات، ويخرّبون الطبيعة، ويدمّرون البشر وحرياتهم. أما مرتكزهم الفلسفي، فهو تعميم هذا الاقتصاد، ودسّ “يدهم الخفية” التي تحرك السوق، فيما الزيادة القصوى في الأرباح هي قاعدتهم العملية. إني أسمّي هذه الفلسفة وهذه الممارسة عنفاً بنيوياً.
إن الدَّين والجوع هما سلاحا التدمير الشامل، اللذين يستخدمهما سادة العالم، ليستعبدوا الشعوب، ويسرقوا قوة عملهم وموادهم الأولى وأحلامهم…
… إن تقرير منظمة الغذاء العالمية (FAO)، يؤكد أن الزراعة العالمية، في الوضع الراهن لتطور القوى الإنتاجية، تستطيع أن توفر الغذاء بصورة طبيعية (أي بما يقدّم 2700 حريرة باليوم لكل إنسان بالغ) لـ (12) مليار إنسان!
ونحن، اليوم، نعدّ (6) مليارات ومائتي مليون إنسان.
باختصار: ليس هناك إذَن من قدر محتوم. وإن كل طفل يموت جوعاً، هو طفل قد قُتل! » (انتهى)

أترك لكم التعليق.
يسعدني أن نتواصل.
تقبلوا محبتي واحترامي.

الأب الياس زحلاوي
دمشق في 28/5/2014


Posted in Middle East, Arabic, Syria1 Comment


Can American Jews unplug the Israel lobby?
By Gilad Atzmon

It is amusing to witness the energy and effort mainstream news outlets are investing in diverting attention from the fact that the current mess in Iraq is the direct outcome of Jewish political domination of the West for the last two decades.

When America and Britain launched the criminal second Gulf War, it was the Zionist Neocons, a bunch of politically influential Jews who urged the ‘liberation’ of the Iraqi people. Members of the same breed of tribal exponents have rallied for intervention in Iran, Libya and most recently in Syria.

But Zio-cons were not the only Jewish players in this iniquitous game, they were opposed by a Jewish progressive front largely funded by George Soros and his Open Society Institute. These so called ‘good Jews’ had a different strategy for the Middle East, they planned to ruin the Muslims through the use of Identity Politics by funding Gay, Lesbian, Feminist and Queer groups in the region.

Why do these Jews intervene in Arab and Muslim life? What motivates George Soros and Paul Wolfowitz to ‘revolutionize’ or ‘liberate’ people living thousands of miles away from Manhattan or Washington? Why did Lord Goldsmith give a green light to the war? What drove Jewish Chronicle writer David Aaronovitch to campaign for a series of interventionist criminal wars?  What pushed Lord ‘cash machine’ Levy to the forefront of Blair’s fundraisers?

In 2007, American political science professors James Petras, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt reached the conclusion that American foreign policy was dominated by Israel’s lobby.  Surely, Israel’s Lobby is just a polite, politically correct name for the Jewish Lobby. But what motivates the Jewish lobby to destroy Iraq, Libya and Syria? Is it their commitment to the Jewish State?

It didn’t take long for influential Jews to learn that buying a Western politician is much cheaper than buying a tank. When you buy an American or British politician, he often comes with the tank and an army of young soldiers willing to die for Zion.

But George Soros, as a highly sophisticated light Zionist merchant, employed a cheaper method to advance the interests of the tribe in the region and beyond. Instead of buying professional politicians, he invested his money in marginal actors and ID politics. He made the NGO into an effective system of neutralizing potential leaders. He supports ‘very good causes’ that are also extremely good for the Jews.

But here there is a problem – these present day Jewish merchants and stockbrokers, who run AIAPC, LFI, CFI, CRIF and the Open Society Institute excel at selling commodities and stocks. They show talent in inventing false needs that quickly translate into mammon and a lot of it. But they are useless or uninterested in advancing America and Britain’s national interests.  They are devoted to the interests of a single tribe, though they often don’t agree amongst themselves what those interests are.

Although probably unintentionally, the Jewish Lobby often fails to bolster Israel’s long- term interests. The destruction of Iraq, for instance, has made Iran into a regional super power. The failure of the Jewish Lobby to foresee its own role in strengthening Iran is evident. Moreover, it has become clear in the last few days that Iran is uniquely positioned to rescue America from the total mess it was pushed into by the Lobby. Clearly, this is no good news for Israel and the Lobby.

If America and Britain want to remain major powers, each must identify corrosive factors within its own politics, media and finance. They must scrutinize the motives of the Jewish lobby and recognize its dangers. It is time to develop the necessary antidote to deal with this acute political poison.


Posted in IraqComments Off on IRAQ, AMERICA AND THE LOBBY



Former Vice-President Dick Cheney broke his silence about the crisis in Iraq on Tuesday, telling reporters, “My thoughts and prayers are with the Iraqi oil wells.”

Speaking from his Wyoming ranch, Cheney said that he had planned to remain quiet about the current state of affairs in Iraq, but “thinking about those oil wells has kept me up at night.”

“If Dick Cheney won’t speak for the Iraqi oil wells, who will?” he said.

Cheney indicated that, as of now, there was no fighting near Iraq’s oil wells, but warned, “If the violence spreads, those wells could be in jeopardy. And it’s up to the international community to insure that that worst-case scenario doesn’t happen.”

The former Vice-President said that he expected to “catch hell” for inserting himself into the debate about Iraq, but was resolute in his decision to do so. “If I prevent one drop of precious oil from being spilled, it will have been worth it,” he said.


Meltdown in Saudi Arabia? Cracks in the gangster House of Saud ” VIDEO ”

Posted in Saudi Arabia1 Comment

NEO – Ukraine’s Ku Klux Klan – NATO’s New Ally



Ukraine’s Ku Klux Klan – NATO’s New Ally
…by  Jim W. Dean, VT Editor,     … with  New Eastern Outlook,  Moscow

“Naturally, the common people don’t want war …but it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.” – Hermann Goering,  Adolf Hitler’s Deputy Chief and Luftwaffe Commander, at Nuremberg (1946).

–  First published  March 25, 2014  –

Ukraine's Ku Klux Klan

Svoboda in Ukraine

The Western not too secret Geo-politico attack on Russia was scrambling for credibility traction over the weekend. America had its KKK period in the South and North, where they were politically strong in localized pockets, but were never a national party with a candidate for president.

Enter stage left, the Ukraine Right Sector “tipping point” thugs, who put the current Kiev coup-meisters into power and who have formed their own political party including the two other major political gangster groups, Svoboda and UNA-UNSO.

This is the usual offensive military psyops routine of having the wolves change into sheep’s clothing to erase their violent past and discourage investigations into their finances, such as, who paid all of their foot soldiers for their recent unpleasantness.

The Right Sector thugs are also the number one suspects for the Kiev sniper killings. Tony Cartalucci had a good NEO article last week on NATO’s Mystery Gunmen so I will not repeat his excellent material here. Be sure to read it if you have not.

Even if they they don’t have voter support for a presidential win, polling at only 1.5%, just think of the swing position this puts them in. For the other parties running, would you rather have the Right Sector thugs working with you, or against you? And if their price was a ministry like internal security for example, would you be willing to put them in there?

Ah, but no way, you say. But what if the US Embassy suggested that you reconsider, that you would want to “control them” so the other opposition party did not get them under their wing. And maybe the promised election campaign funding from the embassy would not be forthcoming if you did not “play ball” and be a team player.

The shocking videos of the US Embassy funded street thugs have been widely distributed on the Net now… with beating up Parliament members, the TV station chief, and slapping around a local prosecutor to convince him that arresting Right Sector thugs on any charges at all would be suicide. The beating, threats and intimidation campaign were rolled out very quickly over just a few days and had a chilling effect. That showed that it had already been planned.

Right Sector thugs visiting a local town council meeting

Right Sector thugs visiting a local town council meeting

Russia Today had a story on a captured Russian national who had gone to Kiev to enjoy the riots and hopefully come home with a few bags of loot. He confessed to having gone around with Right Sector goons to the former government party member’s houses to break into them. They did loot them, but that was not the primary purpose.

He said that US military people were on the raids and focused on collecting all the paperwork for Intel purposes. This juicy little item did not appear in US media. The US embassy military attaché office would not have enough Intel officers to do that. They most assuredly were under NATO command, as they are one of the main forces driving engagement with Russia to forward deploy even more than they already are.

So I was not hyping my title. NATO and most certainly the CIA are in up to their necks with these Ukraine KKK coup gangsters. They are covering the payroll and providing a lot of logistical support, which allowed them to play the key role of getting the West’s pre-selected puppets in control of the interim government.

Right Sector's Dmitry Yarosh (L) and  Alexander Muzychko (R), who died of lead poisoning (three bullets) at his last supper Sunday night

Right Sector’s Dmitry Yarosh (L) and Alexander Muzychko (R), who died of lead poisoning (three bullets) at his last supper Sunday night…resisting arrest

But like the Bolsheviks of another time, they found themselves temporary occupiers of the throne — the Right Sector “party” has now begun putting out warnings to the new government that they are unhappy with their performance to date. Such talk is a not-too-veiled threat… that an interim government would be easier to overthrow than the last one.

Someone with the modest manpower of these nationalist groups would not dare voice this threat without knowing they have powerful backers to make it real. My goodness…who could that possibly be?

Who could be holding back the military from cleaning up these Right Sector people like Hitler once did to the Brownshirt Sturmabteilung leadership, including Ernst Rohm in the Night of the Long Knives. When these Right Sector people have served their usefulness, they be joining Mr. Rohm in history. But now is not the time.

A big play is still being made to portray Kiev as under impending Russian attack. All of the NeoCon and AIPAC PR blogs and news outlets are still hyping the dangerous Red Bear getting ready to devour the Ukraine. And US mass media is trying to regain some lost ratings by riding this wave.

But they are going to crash onto the rocks, as they are once again backing the elite shadow government crowd against the grass root Americans. US corporate media is turning themselves into an alternative media.

Right wing blogs have been full of display maps showing a massive Russian military presence on Ukraine’s eastern border. But they leave out a few things. Such maneuvers have agreements for regional country observers to inspect that the training exercises are just that.

Watching the recent Russian exercises, the foreign inspectors report seeing nothing out of the ordinary that would suggest preparation for an invasion. It is really easy to tell them apart. One big clue is huge amounts of transportation and supply depots being pre-staged. The satellites can pick this all up, even the night movements.

NATO General Breedlove

NATO General Breedlove

So Americans are being lied to once again, but it gets worse. The US NATO commander compromised himself by joining the threat-hyping parade. General Breedlove was guest speaker at a German Marshall Fund think tank event last week.

It is one of the front groups for US and European Intel and policy people to mix and enjoy their company at a string of luxury resorts across Europe. Breedlove described the Russian forces on the Ukraine border as “very sizable, and very, very ready.”

The term ‘very ready’ is an unusual one for a ranking officer to use. It is a meaningless term really, which is probably why his staff selected it for him. He has great latitude later on to adjust what he meant, if needed. But then Breedlove dropped a strange bomb.

He said, “There is absolutely sufficient force postured on the eastern border of Ukraine to run to Trans-Dniester (Moldova) if the decision was made to do that. That is very worrisome.”

Dear General, You worry me sir with your painting a picture of a Russian blitzkrieg, which you know is not imminent. And your cute hedging with “if the decision was made to do that,” does not hide your guilt for hyping the situation for creating a faked need for Kiev wanting NATO to move in and be their palace guard. American servicemen and women do not join the military to be abused by shadow government elites playing a real board game of RISK.

You have me worried that you are the wrong man, in the wrong place, at the wrong time. But, you have a lot of good company with the band of fools who have created yet one more American foreign policy disaster.

Posted in UkraineComments Off on NEO – Ukraine’s Ku Klux Klan – NATO’s New Ally

The Russians Are Coming


by Stephen Lendman

keep calm-russians are coming

Churchill once said a “lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.” Today it circulates instantly.

Goebbels said “(i)f you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.”

“(T)ruth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State,” he added.

Goebbels operated in pre-television days. Media scoundrels embrace his doctrine. They echo official administration policy. They lie, distort, misinform, hype, stoke fear, and falsify information willfully.

They bury truth. They suppress what readers and viewers most need to know. They one-sidedly support wealth, power and privilege.

They cheerlead America’s worst imperial crimes. They vilify its enemies maliciously. They endorse Israeli lawlessness. They blame victims for aggressors’ wrongdoings.

Russia bashing rages daily. Putin is public enemy number one. Big Lies vilify him. They substitute for truth.

Daily headlines are inflammatory. They’re scandalous. They’re abhorrent. They repeat with disturbing regularity.

Millions follow BBC regularly. Most don’t know UK-controlled propaganda substitutes for real news and information.

It’s been this way since BBC’s 1922 inception. John Reith was its first general manager. He was clear and unequivocal saying Britain’s government “know(s) (it) can trust us not to be really impartial.”

Straightaway he betrayed the public trust. BBC is a reliable imperial tool. Credibility isn’t its long suit.

Its claim about “honesty, integrity (being) what the BBC stands for, free from political influence and commercial pressure” is willful, deceptive hype.

UK-based Media Lens offers independent, “authoritative criticism.” Its reports reflect “reality.” It’s free from corporate or government influence.

It covers BBC reporting. It once called it fundamentally one-sided, imbalanced, “biased, blinkered and culpable.”

“Anyone can spot the propaganda with a modicum of vigilance while watching the news,” it said.

Western interests alone are represented. Viewers and listeners get one side only. BBC is government funded, operated and controlled.

It’s Britain’s official voice. It pretends to be independent and impartial. It’s polar opposite. It fronts for power. It supports imperial lawlessness.

On March 23, it headlined “NATO warns of Russian army build-up on Ukraine border.”

It cited NATO commander General Philip Breedlove. It did so without proper due diligence fact-checking. He addressed the German Marshall Fund. He irresponsibly hyped fear.

He lied claiming Russian troops massed on Ukraine’s border. He suggested a possible invasion.

Previously planned exercises are well within Russian territory. Holding them poses no threat. More on this below.

Breedlove said Russia’s “snap exercise puts an incredible force at a border. (It’s) at the Ukrainian border now to the east and is very, very sizable and very, very ready.”

“You cannot defend against that if you are not there to defend against it.”

“So I think we need to think about our allies, the positioning of our forces in the alliance and the readiness of those forces…such that we can be there to defend against it if required, especially in the Baltics and other places.”

He suggested Moscow could target Transdneistria next. In 1990, it declared independence.

It’s between the Dniester River and Moldova’s eastern border. No evidence suggests Russian meddling in its internal affairs.

Breedlove called Russia “more…an adversary than a partner.” BBC regurgitated his comments without challenge.

It irresponsibly cited Kiev’s putschist foreign minister Andriy Deshchytsia. He ludicrously warned about possible war with Russia.

BBC regurgitated his rubbish. He expects Russia “might invade,” he said. He repeated a Big Lie.

So did US Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken. BBC quoted him claiming helping Ukraine with “military assistance” won’t likely “change Russia’s calculus or prevent any invasion.”

Putschist neo-Nazi National Security and Defense Council chief Andriy Parubiy was quoted. He lied claiming Putin’s “troops massed at the border are ready to attack at any moment.”

BBC’s Ian Pannell lied claiming Russian troops used stun grenades in a Saturday raid on the Belbek airbase. More on this below.

BBC’s Mark Lowen lied claiming Russian troops took over the Novofedoivka base in western Crimea. He implied illegality. Evidence and clarification were lacking.

Western media, especially America’s, feature this type rubbish. The Big Lie marches in lockstep. Every opportunity is taken to vilify Russia.

Soviet era Cold War propaganda was never this intense. Truth is buried and ignored. Willful lies and misinformation substitute.

The New York Times is typical. It’s a Washington propaganda machine. On March 21, it headlined “Russia’s Shifting of Border Stirs US Worry,” saying:

“The White House cast doubt Friday on the Kremlin’s claims that thousands of troops massing on the border of southeastern Ukraine are merely involved in training exercises, deepening fears that Russian aggression will not end in Crimea.”

Russian troops aren’t massed on Ukraine’s border. No Russian aggression occurred. None is planned.

No evidence suggests it. Times editors know it. It’s public information. It doesn’t matter. They willfully published lies. They do it multiple times daily.

South African journalist Getahune Bekele once called National Security Advisor Susan Rice a “consummate ally of grubby despots.”

Others condemn her bloody hands. Banality of evil describes her. Death and destruction don’t bother her.

She was quoted once saying, “The only thing we have to do is look the other way.”

In other words, commit horrendous crimes repeatedly, say nothing or claim otherwise. Genocidal slaughter never happened. Millions of corpses aren’t dead.

Rice epitomizes disreputability. Not by Times’ standards. They quoted her saying “(i)t’s not clear” what the Russians are up to.

She lied adding: “Obviously given their past practice and the gap between what they have said and what they have done, we are watching it with skepticism.”

An unnamed Pentagon official was cited, saying:

“The Russian forces are reinforcing and bulking up along the eastern Ukrainian border.”

“Our view is they’re preserving all their options, including going in, absolutely. If they choose to do that, we just wouldn’t have much warning.”

On March 23, RT International headlined “Moscow: No troop build-up or undeclared activity near Ukraine borders.”

Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov was clear, unequivocal and truthful saying:

“The Defense Ministry is complying with all international agreements on the limitation of troops in border areas.”

“By the way, this issue has during the last month been regularly raised in telephone conversations between Russia’s Minister of Defense Sergey Shoigu, and his foreign counterparts, including US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and even acting Ukrainian Defense Minister Igor Tenyukh,” he added.

Shoigu explained clearly. He was unambiguous. Russia has no intention to deploy troops on Ukraine’s border, he stressed.

Russian-based inspectors from America, Canada, Germany, France, Switzerland, Poland, Latvia, Estonia and Finland said “Russian Armed Forces are not undertaking any undeclared military activity that would threaten the security of neighboring countries,” Antonov explained.

“Our venues and regions, where troops are stationed near Ukrainian borders, have twice been checked by the Ukrainian military,” he added.

They spoke directly to Russian military unit chiefs. They took pictures of deployed sites and military equipment.

They accompanied Russian forces on maneuvers. They know exactly what’s going on. They understand no threat exists. For sure they informed their superiors.

“We did our best to meet our partners’ requests by allowing them to inspect all of the sites they wanted to. We have nothing to hide,” Antonov stressed.

Falsified media reports suggest otherwise. It doesn’t surprise. It’s standard scoundrel media practice. Lies substitute for truth.

Headlines stoke fear. They suggest the Russians are coming. NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen hyped the Big Lie. He called Ukraine’s crisis a “game-changer.”

NATO partners and allies must strengthen their economic and military ties in the wake of (nonexistent) Russian aggression, he said.

“The transatlantic bond and NATO matter more for Europe than ever before,” he added. He urged a reaffirmed commitment to collective defense.

“(W)e can no longer do business as usual with Russia,” he said. He wants a full range of capabilities to deter a nonexistent threat.

In mid-March, Washington deployed a dozen F-16s and around 300 military personnel to Poland.

Six F-15s and one K-135 aerial refueling aircraft were sent to Lithuania. Four F-15s were deployed earlier for air patrol missions.

Vice President Biden threatened to invoke NATO’s Article 5 for war on Russia. Intense saber rattling defines Western policy. Doing so escalates tensions dangerously.

On March 23, an inflammatory New York Times headline said “Obama and Allies Seek Firm, United Response as Russia Grips Crimea.”

The Times repeated the Big Lie about “Russia’s invasion of Crimea and the lightening annexation of the peninsula.”

No matter that 96.77% of Crimeans voted legitimately for reunification. UN Charter provisions affirm their self-determination right to do so.

Don’t expect The Times to explain. Or clearly state no Russian invasion occurred. None is planned for Ukraine or anywhere else.

In contrast, imperial war invasions are longstanding US policy. Times editors claim ravaged and destroyed countries are liberated.

America acts with good intentions, they say. Only its enemies are bad guys. Facts are twisted to fit policy.

The Times claimed “Russian special forces” stormed Belbek airbase near Sevastopol on Saturday.

False! On March 22, RT International headlined “Crimean self-defense squads enter Belbek airbase,” saying:

They “surrounded (it) after Ukrainian troops inside refused to lay down arms and leave the base in accordance to the Crimean prime minister’s order.”

According to Sevastopol ForPost news web site journalist Dmitry Osipenko, they now control the base.

Ukrainian forces were asked to leave. They’re operating illegally. They’re on Russian territory. They need permission to stay. It’s not forthcoming.

Osipenko said “(a)ccording to his information, nobody was injured, but (he’s) not sure.”

He heard gunfire. It came from the Ukrainian side. It’s unclear who was shooting, he said.

“The self-defense forces hid behind cars and then a car rammed the gate,” he added. Sevastopol Cossacks were present.

RT quoted an order putschist defense minister Igor Tenyukh gave Ukrainian forces in Crimea. It’s illegal. It said “remain in place.” You’re “allowed to use weapons.”

The vast majority of Ukraine’s Crimean forces abandoned their positions voluntarily. Most wish to remain in Crimea. They reject Kiev putschists. Don’t expect media scoundrels to explain.

Instead, feature op-ed space is given to contributors who deserve none. Michal McFaul is former US ambassador to Russia.

He’s a neocon connected with Stanford University’s right-wing Hoover Institute. Its agenda includes:

  • prioritizing marketplace sovereignty;
  • deregulation;
  • privatization of government services;
  • ending social justice;
  • abolishing affirmative action;
  • waging class war; as well as
  • controlling electoral politics and supportive media backing everything on its wish list.

Herbert Hoover’s 1959 statement guides policy, saying:

America’s “social and economic systems are based on private enterprise from which springs initiative and ingenuity.”

“Ours is a system where the Federal Government should undertake no governmental, social or economic action, except where local government, or the people, cannot undertake it for themselves.”

“(Safeguarding) the American system, (requires) individual, economic, and political freedom; private enterprise; and representative government.”

Hoover acolytes want one representing their interests alone.

Times editors gave McFaul feature op-ed space. He irresponsibly headlined “Confronting Putin’s Russia,” saying:

Putin’s “decision (to) annex Crimea ended the post-Cold War era in Europe.”

“Our new era is one defined by ideological clashes, nationalistic resurgence and territorial occupation…”

McFaul absurdly claimed Washington “did not seek this confrontation. The new era crept up on us, because we did not fully win the Cold War.”

A previous article discussed confronting Russia. Washington began in 1917. It never stopped.

The Cold War never ended. It’s worse than ever now. America wants Russian independence destroyed. It wants pro-Western subservient leadership replacing it.

It wants Russia transformed into dystopian harshness like what’s planned for Ukraine.

It wants control of Russian resources. It wants its people exploited. It wants a major world rival removed. It wants China isolated. It wants Beijing treated the same way.

Hegemons operate this way. America is the most ruthless in world history by far. Don’t expect McFaul to explain. He’s part of the problem, not the solution.

Putin wasn’t “inevitable,” he said. He lied suggesting his overwhelming 2012 electoral victory was fraudulent.

Independent monitors judged it scrupulously open, free and fair. America’s sham process pales by comparison.

According to McFaul, Putin reinstituted Soviet policies. Nothing whatever suggests it.

He “need(s) an enemy,” McFaul claims. He’s gone all-out for cordial relations with all countries.

He justifiably opposes US imperialism. He’s against American unipolar world policies. McFaul called his justifiable criticisms “propaganda.”

“(A)nti-Americanism” is featured on “state-controlled television,” he said. It “reached a fanatical pitch with Mr. Putin’s annexation of Crimea.”

McFaul obviously either didn’t hear or read his mid-March wide-ranging interview on Ukraine, didn’t say if he did, and for sure ignored his candor.

He lied claiming Putin “no longer feels constrained by international laws and norms, and is unafraid to wield Russian power to revise the international order.”

Putin respects rule of law principles. No nation trashes them more than America. It wages lawless aggression against one country after another. A police state apparatus rules at home.

Don’t expect McFaul to explain. He’s part of the Russia bashing amen chorus. It’s hard imagining how Moscow endured him as ambassador.

His entire anti-Russian diatribe repeated one lie after another. Times editors disgracefully featured them. McFaul ludicrously called putschist-run Ukraine “a democracy.”

No one elected their power-grabbers. For sure most Ukrainians won’t want them once they realize how grievously they were betrayed.

Police state lawlessness rules. Ahead comes IMF-imposed dystopian harshness. Crackdowns will confront nonbelievers. McFaul endorses state-sponsored injustice. He supports it at home.

Posted in RussiaComments Off on The Russians Are Coming

Secret Wife and Missing £12 Million

The late King of Saudi Arabia, his ‘secret’ Christian wife and the missing £12 million: Janan Harb threatens to ‘spill the beans’ if ‘promised’ money isn’t paid.

The “secret” Christian wife of the late King of Saudi Arabia has won the right to pursue his son for a vast sum of cash and properties that she says he promised her before he died.

Janan Harb, 65, claims she was married to King Fahd in 1968, when she was 19 and he was a prince and minister of the interior. He later promised to provide for her financially for the rest of her life, she says.

She also claims that the King’s son, Prince Abdul Aziz, told her more than a decade ago that he would honour his father’s promise and offered her £12 million in cash and two high value central London properties – but so far has not given her anything.

Details of the case emerged at a hearing at the High Court in London on Monday, where Mrs Justice Rose ruled that the claim could proceed despite Prince Aziz claiming “state immunity” from the British legal system. The decision opens the way for a potentially embarrassing full hearing which could shine a light on the dealings of the House of Saud.

“After 12 years of persistence I am very happy and relieved,” Mrs Harb told reporters after the ruling. “If the prince is going to appeal, I am going to accept the offer of the movie of the book I have written – I am going to spill the beans.”

Now a British citizen, Mrs Harb claims she was forced to leave Saudi Arabia before King Fahd ascended to the throne in 1982. She says his son made her the offer of cash and properties – on Cheyne Walk in Chelsea, an exclusive street overlooking the River Thames – at a meeting in 2003, two years before his father died.

The judge said Prince Aziz, who did not attend the hearing, had not made any response “as regards the accuracy or otherwise” of Mrs Harb’s allegations, but had instead restricted himself to “contesting the jurisdiction of the court”.

She added that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia had expressed its support for the prince’s claim for state immunity in the form of a letter issued through its London embassy.

The judge’s decision rested on whether immunity could be extended to everything that King Fahd had done while he was head of Saudi Arabia, even after he was dead. She ruled that it could not.

A Christian who was born in poverty in Palestine, Mrs Harb has previously claimed she met the King at a party in Beirut and that while she was married to him, she was not allowed outside the palace walls and was prohibited from having children.

She claims she was eventually ordered to leave the country because the rest of the Saudi royal family did not approve of the marriage, but that she had remained in touch with the King by telephone throughout his life.

Her solicitor, Mandeep Kaur Virdee of Neumans LLP, said: “We are delighted with the outcome of this judgment. The law surrounding this area has already established, confirming that personal immunity ceases when a head of state is no longer in office for any reason.”

A spokesman for Neumans added: “Mrs Harb is passionate about sharing her personal account of what it is truly like to be married to a Saudi King and believes the exposure will be of public interest.

“Her story has received international interest from film producers and she is currently in detailed discussions to progress the adaptation of her book into a film. There are also negotiations under way with regard to the publishing of her book in advance of this.”

Posted in Saudi ArabiaComments Off on Secret Wife and Missing £12 Million

Zionist silent on report Greece blocked I$raHell arms shipments to Iran



From  the Times of Israel
First published on February 17,  2014
[ Editor’s Note: Here is one folks, that slipped by us. Looks like a classic psyops by the Israelis to build up Iran’s bogeyman image to keep their pretend-a-threat game going to milk it for all it is worth. The story within the story here is one, how this was kept quiet on the US side. And two… the US has busted up numerous Israeli false flags and let others be carried out, solely due to whether they thought there was a benefit to be derived. Welcome to that world…Jim W. Dean ]
Spare parts for F-4 Phantom jets said despatched by a ghost company near Haifa; TV report wonders whether this was some kind of sting operation against Iran.

Greek authorities intercepted arms shipments apparently sent by one or more Israelis and intended for Iran, in violation of international sanctions, a Greek newspaper reported.

Greek officials, working together with the American Homeland Security Investigations agency, uncovered two shipments of spare parts for F-4 Phantom jets in December 2012 and again in April 2013, the Kathimerini daily reported over the weekend.

Israeli officials declined Sunday to comment on the report which, if true, would represent the shocking effort by Israelis to supply arms to the country’s most bitter enemy. Israel’s nightly news broadcasts featured the story prominently, but highlighted its sensitivity and stressed that they were basing their coverage on “foreign reports” rather than original coverage that might have been subjected to military censorship.

The United States was aware of the shipments “in real time,” Israel’s Channel 2 news reported, and was thus able to thwart them. The TV report added that “it has to be assumed that Israel knew too, and was updated by the United States.” Finally, the Channel 2 report suggested that this may have been some kind of sting operation against the Iranians, since “it could be that whoever did this was not acting against Israel’s interest.”

The rival Channel 10 news, by contrast, noted that “there have been cases in the past where the lust for money” overcomes the national interest. A Greek court ordered the shipments confiscated and transferred to the Americans, according to Kathimerini, which claimed to have a copy of the investigation report.

According to the Greek report, the shipment originated in the Israeli town of Binyamina-Giv’at Ada and was sent via a Greek company based in Athens. Investigators from the drugs and weapons unit of Greece’s Financial Crimes Squad determined the company was a ghost company, Kathimerini reported.

The firm was registered by a British national from the northern city of Thessaloniki who could not be traced. The report did not name the Israeli or Israelis thought to be behind the smuggling attempt.

Posted in ZIO-NAZI, Greece, IranComments Off on Zionist silent on report Greece blocked I$raHell arms shipments to Iran

Gaza – a hellhole created by I$raHell

Gaza child – victim of Israeli war crimes

By Rana Alshami

Israel has launched yet another campaign against the Palestinian people. This time its excuse is the kidnapping of three teenage “boys”. Israel is using this incident to once again collectively punish my people. According to international law, collective punishment is a crime.

Israel worries about these children of illegal colonizers who threw my people off of our land, but what about the thousands of Palestinians, including young children, who have been abducted by Israeli soldiers and thrown into Israeli jails without charge? What are our children guilty of to be imprisoned and trapped in cages? Did they fire rockets into Israel in reaction to the many times more rockets Israel fires at our homes and lands?

Lest we forget

You must not forget these crimes, nor should you forget Israel’s bloody massacres of my people.

My people suffer behind walls and the rest of the world remains ignorant and silent. Thousands of Palestinian children have been tortured in Israeli prisons. No one knows the pain we live with. What proof is there that we really kidnapped the “boys”? And if Palestinians did kidnap these Jewish boys, they would have done so as a result of the atrocities they and their families have been subjected to throughout their entire lives.

We are deprived even of our sleep, and the only thing the powers that oppress us expect us to do is to remain ignorant. 

Beginning over 45 years ago, Israel began building settlements in order to prove its claim to all of our land, which it stole by virtue of its  greater strength and cunning. It build new settlements and continues to expand existing ones. Chedi Klibi, former Secretary-General of the Arab League, outlines three basic objectives of Israel’s expansionism:

  1. The annexation of more Arab lands, including the displacement of the inhabitants, which lead to demographic changes that increase the Jewish population; expropriation of Palestinian property and the necessary and continuous repression required to prevent the Palestinians from keeping what is rightfully theirs.
  2. The preemption of any attempt by the Palestinian people to affirm their human rights, among which is the right of self-determination in their own land. Thus, the original and long term objective of proliferating and expanding settlements is to eliminate the Palestinian people and their recognized national rights from the region’s political map.
  3. To use the settlements issue to foil any political solution that doesn’t concede full Israeli sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory. Israel is saying, in effect, that it will accept nothing less than surrender, even though it insists on calling this surrender “peace”.

Dear reader, do you know what it means to be a Palestinian? It means you are not able to move here or there, and that you have few of the basic requirements needed to live a decent life. We are deprived even of our sleep, and the only thing the powers that oppress us expect us to do is to remain ignorant.

As Palestinians, curses follow us everywhere we go. For example, last year I went to Cairo to be interviewed for my visa. I did the interview very well but the officer smiled at me and said: “Rana, sorry, but we can‘t issue your visa to the US.” I asked why? His only answer was “because you are Palestinian”. My American friend spent USD 1,000 on the visa application, travel expenses to and from Cairo, and three days of food and lodging for my mother and me. The US, which assists Israel in making life difficult for us, made us go through an expensive and time-consuming process that it knew all along would result in rejection.

Hear no evil, see no evil

How much longer will the world stay deaf? Is our blood free of charge? What crimes have our children committed that they are forced to live in hell? We are human beings, not aliens. We are exactly like you. Regardless of colour, sex, nationality or religion, we just want to live like you in peace and under good conditions.

Imagine sleeping when, suddenly, you are awakened in the middle of the night to the sounds of rockets and warplanes, and children screaming. 

Imagine sleeping when, suddenly, you are awakened in the middle of the night to the sounds of rockets and warplanes, and children screaming. Tell me, how would you deal with this situation? What would you tell your child if he came to you crying and shouting because of the bombing?

Last night, unable to sleep, my 14-year-old brother said to me: “Rana, I put the bicycle on the door of the balcony because of the strong explosion I heard.” When he told me this, I felt helples, knowing I could not do anything to stop the bombing.

Israeli forces shoot gas bombs on my people. Israel practices repression as a major cornerstone of its policy in our occupied land.

Raise your voices and stand by the truth, no matter how much it costs. Our children want the same freedom you have. They want their human rights. All the world should know what life is like here in Gaza. Only justice will heal the wounds of my people.


Posted in Palestine Affairs, ZIO-NAZI, GazaComments Off on Gaza – a hellhole created by I$raHell

Shoah’s pages