Categorized | ZIO-NAZI

The inevitable fall from grace of Paul Joseph Watson


Written by. Cat Alexander Ferris

PJW Article

Many of us that have come to even the most superficial awakening, have at some point, either listened to or supported Alex Jones and Infowars. At the beginning, one can find great information that has been gathered by the staff, but within the last few years, we have seen a slide from being an “alternative media” outlet, to actually promoting a narrative, that is obviously one that benefits only a small group. Even within the “Alternative media field” one can see the divide that has only become so much more obvious. Paul Joseph Watson is an editor for Infowars and PrisonPlanet, someone who had shown an incredible talent for research and a capacity to see through the trees, or so I thought.


I must admit, part of the reason I’m writing, this is because I once held PJW in such high esteem and felt he might be the key to keeping AJ and Infowars, at least somewhat balanced. Mr. Watson had actually made a small update called “Did Israel collude with ISIS” during the 2014 genocide of Gaza, where he identified not only “israel’s” destruction of Gaza, but that “israel” is actually supplying logistical support for Al nursra and other “compartmentalized Jihadist”. Which was a great sign, but it seems as if he has moved far away from this fact. People that would never have had the capacity to cause so much chaos, if it wasn’t for the west funding and supplying “compartmentalized Jihadists” for the better part of the last 100 years. Again this is something Mr. Watson is, I’m sure, well aware of, yet he has now consistently put forward a narrative, that is not only based on limited conclusions, but by people who have shown themselves to be illegitimate.

Infowars’ Paul Watson Goes Full Sean Hannity on Islam


Recently Infowars and PJW had Tommy Robinson from the EDL (english defense league), a group infamous for its rhetoric against Muslims/immigrants and a “leader” who can only be referred to as a lackey. Although everyone does have the right to free expression, its interesting that PJW and Infowars have become so comfortable with people like this and laid the red carpet out for them. Again its one thing for Journalists to interview and interact with many people who are considered controversial, but it’s another thing to have them on as almost a personal guest. Its become very clear that AJ and PJW have adopted the narrative, not so different from the one that was spit by mainstream media, on 911. Paul Has forgotten to mention, that for the better part of 9 decades, the west has continually financed those who would be the most beneficial, within regime change in Eurasia. By doing so, this would guarantee that no Middle Eastern leader or nation, would ever rise that would rival the US and the “Orders” geopolitical hegemony.


Emir Faisal’s party at Versailles, during the Paris Peace Conference of 1919. At the centre, from left to right: Rustum Haidar, Nuri as-Said, Prince Faisal, Captain Pisani (behind Faisal) T. E. Lawrence (known as “Lawrence of Arabia”), Faisal’s assistant (name unknown), Captain Tahsin Qadri.


The “West” in its failed foreign policy are an integral part of why “radical Islam” has become the number one asset in these regions and for the most part, is a major reason we see such backlash. This narrative also plays beneficial for those in “Israel”, who continue to carry out their own demented form of manifest destiny on the Palestinian population, but most importantly the IOFs attacks against Palestinian children and Journalists. I have yet to hear Paul bring this issue up when dealing with those who are in his inner circle, he has failed time and time again to report the situation of Free Press, inside Occupied Palestine and with his recent posts, has used “Think Tanks” like “PEW” (PEW is a think tank that is used heavily by Hasbara drones to justify their pound of flesh) to prove his narrative. That Islam and a huge majority of its population, somehow support indecency, destruction and decay. Something Vittorio Arrigoni was well aware of, that Gaza and much of the Muslim world will not start to totally liberalize itself, while being physically destroyed and that it would come organically once Occupation has ended.


Although Gaza and indeed Occupied Palestine, women are allowed to drift race, take part in parkour, and all the other things you would associate with “liberal” humanity. Without mentioning Palestinian Christians who are simply thrown in with the boogeyman and left to the mercy of ignorant conclusions about the Middle east and its people. PJW has also spent a great amount of time ridiculing feminists and Black lives matters, which is fine to challenge them, but to make it the corner-stone of your research and social media “resistance” is a waste of talent. We have seen PJW throw on wigs and pretend to be a comedian, when in reality, those issues are more political football than real “professional” research or topics.

“Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication” September 2004


hy has Islam become the enemy for PJW and Infowars and I’ve heard the qualifying comments that are used by these men, “not all Muslims are bad” “but” and then go ahead and begin to label off things they have no knowledge about. I’m sure PJW has never attempted to go into a mosque and a have a dialogue, I highly doubt he has sat and read the Quran in its entirety. Limited conclusions based on minds that have had personal experiences they felt were negative. They are kinda like the people traveling the world, who base their whole conclusion of a nation and people, because they had a bad personal experience there, while others rave and cheer about it. Old Tommy boy over at the EDL doesn’t like the fact, that his town is being “taken over”, imagine how the people in Gaza and Syria feel. That his government is guilty of creating and nurturing “radical Islam” that has laid to waste Muslims, Christians and Jews all over Eurasia.


Another important fact is that Iran, an Islāmic nation has about 30,000 Jews living under the same relative rights as Muslims and Christians. 972 magazine did an article called; “With tens of thousands of jews living in Iran, why is bibi calling their rulers nazis?”, something I highly doubt PJW or the EDL will likely share, that’s without mentioning the reaction by Muslim brothers when they discovered the western agent Choudary trying to attend their mosque. Actually many of the videos and links that are used by PJW and the EDL to de-legitimize Muslims, are actually the work of Choudary, someone who has found himself alone, with a rather small following. When you think that there is roughly 1.6 billion Muslims in the world, Muslims often condemn Choudary and he has also been condemned by many Muslims in the world as a heretic.

Infowars’ Paul Watson Goes Full Sean Hannity on Islam

Many of those who claim themselves now an “authority“, have forgotten one very important fact, that no man or woman is above scrutiny and if they think that they can silence the accuser, by ridiculing the accuser or by censoring them; “they will find that there will be more accusers than there is now, those I have tried to restrain, they will be younger and more severe with you and you will be more offended by them, the greatest way is to be improving yourselves not destroying whole populations.”

At Infowars, Editor-At Large Paul Joseph Watson claimed that Ahmed’s story gained attention because of the “trendy” fact that the student is Muslim and called the notion that Ahmed’s race or religion played a factor in his treatment “completely bogus”:

14-year-old Ahmed Mohamed built a clock to impress his teacher but ended up in handcuffs after police were called over concerns the object resembled a bomb.

The leftist media and social justice warrior ‘virtue signalers’ immediately leapt on the story to claim that Mohamed was targeted because he was a Muslim (and not because his “clock” looked nothing like a clock and more closely resembled a bomb in a briefcase).

Never wasting an opportunity to ingratiate himself with the politically correct crowd, Obama reached out to Ahmed and invited him to visit the White House.

The notion that white kids wouldn’t be treated the same way and that Ahmed was only targeted because of his skin color or religion is completely bogus.

Innumerable non-Muslim kids have been disciplined, suspended and even SWAT-teamed for objects far less concerning than Ahmed’s clock.

To the left, defending American kids who are persecuted for wearing Old Glory just isn’t trendy enough, but if a Muslim called Mohamed gets in trouble for bringing something that resembles a bomb to school, liberals are falling over themselves to worship him.[, 9/17/15]

[PDF] Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on …

Federation of American Scientists Filed under Strategic Communication. September 2004. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. For Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics. Washington, D.C. 20301-3140 …

16 Responses to “The inevitable fall from grace of Paul Joseph Watson”

  1. john gourlay says:

    Hi, Islam is a totalitarian regime that is incompatible with western democracy. That statement is not racist, but merely a fact. Open your eyes.



  2. ME says:

    “Islam is a violent, intolerant religion which has no place in western democracies.”

    Okay, how is that statement in any way, shape or form FALSE?



  3. Loulou says:

    Islam is not a race. It’s a dangerous political and judicial regime masquerading as a religion. Therefore, you cannot call anyone a racist for opposing it. One is allowed to oppose Islam for any reason they wish, without being called names.

    Race is about ethnicity. And PJW was correct.

  4. Carolyn says:

    Just wondered if there is such a thing as ‘Westernophobia’ or (in my case) Britishophobia? No? Thought not.

  5. aires says:

    Religions were born out of ignorance in pre-medevil times. There will be no freedom until the last king is strangelled with the entrails of the last priest/claric!

  6. Shlom says:

    Look at all the PJW apologists in this comments section. Sad! The man is a hack who has zero credibility.

    I wonder if these people would be so willing to refer Judaism as an ‘evil totalitarian ideology’ – after all it shares most of its views on life with Islam.

    Probably not. 🙂

  7. daniel says:

    there is a general misconception about Christianity among many people. Civil governments of the West are not Christian, but secular. You can only be labelled a Christian if you follow the teachings of Jesus Christ. You shall know the tree by the fruit. If I call myself ‘Father Christmas’, does it make me ‘Father Christmas’? Obviously not, because the proof will be that I have a long beard, a sled, some reindeer, elven labour and I have a North Pole address. A Western country that calls itself Christian, but murder innocent foreigners in warfare is obviously not Christian. The 10 moral laws of God clearly states that ‘thou shalt not kill’, which means that if you do kill someone {except off course in self-defense}, you are clearly not following God’s teachings thereby exempting yourself from the Kingdom of God. Jesus preached that one should love his enemies, that you should serve and forgive those who spitefully use you. True Christianity is a religion of peace and Jesus is the Prince of Peace. Any act of violence, murder or hatred is clearly not Christian irrespective of what they claim that do those things. Jesus makes it clear that he shall judge the wickedness of man whatever they claim to be or claim to worship. The USA/ UK/ EU etc are not Christina governments. Peace on your house

  8. Manish says:

    Now this is amusing. When PJW was a virulent antisemite, Muslims didn’t mind him but now that he is targeting Islam, they are suddenly not finding him to their liking and are coming to defend their religion of piss.

    As a Hindu Atheist who will always remember the genocide of my people during the Islamic Invasions of India, I and a billion other Hindus out there are going to support our Jewish brothers and sisters in Zionism.

    The Jews gave us Einstein, Muslims gave us a warmongering paedophile as role model.

    The Palestinians and their supporters can go to hell. Every time a Muslim cries about Palestine, the words Hypocrisy can be seen glaring on his forehead for we know that they cry only Muslim deaths but celebrate when non Muslims are slaughtered in the name of their filthy cult.

    Muslims have wronged millions throughout History, and if Jews are their enemies then they are our friends.

  9. Sam says:

    What is important to humankind? I say, the most important item in the possession of humankind today is the Constitution of the United States. Where does Islam stand on this, the Constitution of the United States? We must all know, freedom is better than the gods, freedom is life everlasting, the fulfillment of all the promise of all the Universe, wrapped up in a neat little package..where do you stand on freedom of the individual? How about religion, is religion better than human freedom, the right to chose a mate, the right to address your accuser, the right to own property and vote for the leadership, for starters. It is an old word, but the best word, freedom. I must say: if the gods could exist then we would need to hunt them down and kill them. The opposite of freedom is religion.

  10. John says:

    “Palestinians and their supporters can go to hell.”

    Zionists and their supporters can go to hell. Why don’t you hypocrites read the Talmud for once and see what the Zionists think of non-Jews? It’s far worse than anything in the bible or quran! It quite literally says that all non-jews are goyim (cattle), and exist solely to serve Jews. It’s the truth.

    It’s obvious to me PJW was cointelpro all along. For any of the idiots who think they can support Israel and yet believe they can fight against the NWO at the same time, all I got say is you can’t have it both ways. The Zionsts are part of the NWO, so if you support Zionism, then you support the NWO, making you part of the problem.

    As for warmongers and Pedophilia, the Jews have plenty of that themselves in the form of the neocon lobby and pedophile rabbis.

    Guess who owns most of the major news media outlets and Hollywood? The Zionists do; it sure as hell ain’t the Muslims or Saudi Arabia like AJ claims. Only a kool-aid drinking ziotard would believe that clown.

  11. Absurdity says:

    PJW is pushing narratives and refusing objective research! I’m going to write a narrative-pushing and unobjective article about him.

    Good job.

  12. Sergio Weigel says:

    Thank you for this fairly balanced article. I think that what Islamophobic – just like any other – bigots forget is that their words have consequences. If they were responsible thinkers, they wouldn’t spew such generalizing statements, because they actually put fuels to the flame. This kind of reaction is exactly what those Salafi-Wahhabi crazies want. It just helps them gather more followers. But maybe a larger burning conflict is also what those Islamophobes want?

    If they were responsible thinkers, or thinkers at all, they wouldn’t usher stuff like “Islam is a violent, intolerant religion which has no place in western democracies.” This is statement is just an emotional Big-Blah as it contains nothing substantial. Quite contrary it leaves open a lot of questions:

    1) Are “Western” nations democracies? Really? I’d call them plutocracies.

    2) Humans in general can be violent and intolerant, that’s simply a part of human nature. What makes Islam so special then?

    3) Are you tolerant?

    4) Is really all of Islam violent and intolerant? The Quran contains both messages of peace and tolerance of violence and intolerance. It has to do with which phase Mohammed’s life you wanna look at: the Mecca or the Medina phase?

    5) Isn’t the same true for the Bible and as such the Torah? And what about other non-religious ideologies? Which takes me back to question number two.

    And so on…

    Every time I start asking these questions, I will of course immediately turn into a apologist of Islam (I am areligious, always have been, always will be) or bleeding heart liberal or some other Big-Blah-Buzzword.

    What I’ve noticed when talking to bigots – and really it doesn’t matter fuck all, if they’re Islamophobes, Muslims, Christians, White Supremacists, Americanists, Zionists, Libertarians, Capitalists, or those special liberal snowflakes, or what else you might have – as soon as you ask question that makes them question their emotional state with logic, they will lash out at you by calling exactly that which they oppose.

    This whole thing has nothing to do with logic and reason, but all with emotion, which is fine as it part of human nature as well that we – our thoughts and actions – are essentially dictated by our emotions. But this is exactly: how I understand humanism: To accept human nature as it is – with all its flaws, to try to abstract from it using logic, reason and most of all empathy, and to act as responsibly as you can, even when you usher statements. There will be a reaction. And if the reaction is not what you claim you want, e.g. decrease of “radical Islam”, then maybe you’re doing it wrong.

  13. me says:

    Paul Joseph Watson is some self promoting right wing troll, with a little more than one liners, he’s a hatchet job, he wouldn’t stand up to an in depth discussion. But my real issue is this:

    Paul Joseph Watson is unknown in the UK, I mean when I first heard him I thought, how did this vitriol filled luddite from the north get on to Alex Jones show. I mean if the UK viewership of Alex Jones saw him they’d all say who the hell is he?

    He has a constructed legend (back story) and I really don’t know much else about him, only that – for media you get a lot more money spinning right wing vitriol in US media, being there are all sorts of right wing media shows wanting that.

    He is merely a careerist, who probably failed in the UK, that’s if he is actually british, his US obsession seems utter fiction, unless he actually is a Yank.

  14. Marcus says:

    Plenty of inaccuracies in this article. Such as Tommy Robinson. This article was published December 2015 and yet Robinson left the EDL in 2013 as he didn’t agree with their philosophies any longer. Do your research next time, or else you look a moron.



  15. Rachel says:

    Sad. It is hard to get a clear understanding when no one can seem to communicate the issues in an unbiased way. Your hate is also apparent, especially in responses to the comments. It makes it difficult to hear what you are saying. May rational minds prevail.


Shoah’s pages


December 2015
« Nov   Jan »