Archive | July 30th, 2020

Study Finds Online Antisemitic Harassment Against Jews Caused by Other Jews

Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem,Sr

Antisemitic trolling and disinformation is allegedly rising online, and so is harassment of Jews because of their views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, often at the hands of other Jews who disagree, a new study claims:

The Institute for the Future, a California-based think tank, conducted a series of studies of online propaganda and harassment that took place during the 2018 midterm elections. They concentrated on ways online trolls attack disenfranchised groups like Jews, Muslims, Latinos and LGBTQ people, as well as people with controversial political opinions, like environmentalists and pro-choice and pro-life activists. Their conclusion: Harassment on social media, including coordinated trolling campaigns and the promotion of conspiracy theories, is getting worse, causing users to pull away from online conversations.

The institute’s study of the Jewish community found that anti-Semitic conspiracy theories were highly prevalent on Twitter. More than 85% of tweets in their dataset that used the word “Soros” – a reference to the Jewish financier and Democratic donor George Soros, who is often the subject of conspiracies – were anti-Semitic. “Age-old anti-Semitic tropes and conspiracies are flourishing, particularly among Twitter users that identify as Republicans and/or supporters of President Trump,” the researchers wrote.

But interviews with 17 Jews of varying ages, religious denominations and political orientations – including “elected officials, political candidates, policymakers, academics, activists, journalists, consultants, and commentators” – found that some of the worst harassment was coming from fellow Jews who disagreed with them about Israeli-Palestinian issues.

Many Jewish subjects – including pro-Israel figures, anti-Zionists and progressives who support a Jewish state but oppose many Israeli policies – believed that “Twitter mobs” and “coordinated misinformation campaigns” led by people or organizations with differing views on the conflict, often themselves Jewish, were specifically targeting Jews like them. “All of our interviewees who spoke about divides within the Jewish community considered this a seriously problematic trend,” the researchers wrote. “As complex discourse is replaced by rigid partisanship, the Jewish community is in danger of losing the solidarity which sustained it for thousands of years.”

The study also found that use of language like “neo-Nazi” and “Hitler” were rarely used to target Jews, but were often used to either criticize President Trump or defend him from claims of Nazi-like behavior.

There is enormous pressure among Jews to conform to “group-think”, especially when it comes to supporting Israel and its ongoing effort to wipe the Palestinians off the map.  So-called “liberal” Jews often feel some compassion for the plight of the Palestinians, and that compassion to so-called “conservative” Jews is now being characterized as “antisemitic” and “self-hating”.  Regardless of what country a Jew lives in, he or she is expected to support Israel, right or wrong, and if you don’t go along with this agenda, you’ll be compared to Hitler, the ultimate boogeyman for Jews.

But as we’ve noted here before, there is no love lost among Jews, and disagreements often escalate to the point where the harassment of each other becomes so serious that expensive studies need to be done to find the “cause” which, in this case, is obviously jewish behavior.  And while Jews will acknowledge that antisemitism among Jews is caused by other Jew, antisemitism caused by non-Jews or so-called “gentiles” is never caused by jewish behavior.  And this is the ultimate take-away we can all agree upon here.

Posted in ZIO-NAZI, PoliticsComments Off on Study Finds Online Antisemitic Harassment Against Jews Caused by Other Jews

Nazi court awards Jerusalem church properties to settlers

Israeli court awards Jerusalem church properties to settlers

Tamara Nassar 

Man dressed in klobuk and long beard
The Greek Orthodox Patriarch Theophilos III of Jerusalem attends the Christmas mass celebrations at the Church of the Nativity, in the occupied West Bank city of Bethlehem on 6 January 2019.  Wisam HashlamounAPA images

An Israeli court last month denied a petition by the Greek Orthodox Church to overturn the sale of leases on Jerusalem properties to an extremist Israeli settler organization.

The ruling again gives Ateret Cohanim, a right-wing group involved in colonizing Palestinian land in the city, the green light to take over the three properties.

The Jerusalem district court ruled in favor of the settler group last August, which seeks to ensure a Jewish majority in the Old City of Jerusalem through settlement and forcibly displacing native Palestinians.

Ateret Cohanim claims to have leased the church lands in 2004 from Irenaeus I, the Greek Orthodox patriarch at the time. The leases were for 99 years.

The church said it will appeal the 24 June ruling with Israel’s high court, and accused Jerusalem’s district court of neglecting “a host of new evidence of delinquent behavior, including extortion, fraud and deception” regarding the 2004 transactions.

“The court’s ruling came as a surprise, and it was received this morning within less than 24 hours from the conclusion of the hearing on the matter, without the court examining the evidence and without allowing it to be heard,” the patriarchate said.

“We believe that after reviewing the evidence, the Supreme Court will accept our case and reverse the district court’s decision.”

Yet that faith in Israel’s highest court may be misplaced.

It has previously ruled in favor of the settler organization, giving the go-ahead for it to take over the properties.

For the past 16 years, Ateret Cohanim has fought a legal battle against the church to try to seize the properties near Jaffa Gate in the Old City.

Two of the three properties, New Imperial Hotel and Petra Hotel, are currently occupied by Palestinian organizations, which Ateret Cohanim seeks to evict.

They are two of the oldest buildings in the city, overlooking the Dome of the Rock and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.

Irenaeus I was ousted from the church following accusations that he approved the transactions with Ateret Cohanim.

The three sites were leased at a much lesser value than they are worth, and church officials were accused of receiving payments from the settler group to advance the transaction.

A commission formed by the Palestinian Authority in 2005 investigated the matter and exonerated Irenaeus I of involvement in the transaction.

The investigation concluded that the deals were not endorsed by the Synod of Jerusalem, rendering them “legally invalid so they remain incomplete.”

Irenaeus I claimed his ousting was not legal and continued to identify as patriarch.

Theophilos III, the current patriarch, has rejected the sales that his predecessor allegedly approved, saying they involved bribes and corruption. The church took over the sites following his appointment.

The patriarchate claims that Ateret Cohanim bribed the church’s finance director, Nikolas Papadimos, to move forward with the deal.

The Greek Orthodox Church is one of the biggest landowners in the country.

While Theophilos III is attempting to stop the three properties from being taken over by Israeli settlers, he has himself been accused of trying to sell other church assets to often mysterious buyers, including Israeli investors.

This has caused Palestinian Christians to call for his ouster as patriarch of the Greek Orthodox Church.

Posted in Palestine Affairs, ZIO-NAZI, PoliticsComments Off on Nazi court awards Jerusalem church properties to settlers

Palestine: Nazi regime increase control in East Jerusalem

The Nazi municipality says the intention with Silicon Wadi is to improve employment and living standards.

Third Intifada Cartoons | Latuff Cartoons

The Nazi municipal government is planning to turn an industrial neighbourhood in the Nazi occupied East Jerusalem into a technology hub.

But opponents say the project is another attempt to illegally solidify Nazi control over the Nazi occupied Palestinian land.

Posted in Palestine Affairs, ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Palestine: Nazi regime increase control in East Jerusalem

The True Face of Covid-19: Fear and “Shock Therapy” to Impose a Totalitarian Society?

By Dr. Pascal Sacré

“Fear is only reverse faith; it is faith in evil instead of good.” Florence Scovel Shinn

After several months of the COVID-19 crisis, relevant elements of analysis of this crisis are becoming clearer.

1. The enormous pressure to convince 7 billion people of the need to be vaccinated against a virus [1] whose mortality has been inflated [2] and which is said to be ubiquitous while it is disappearing or has even disappeared.

It reminds us of the 2009 operation, with the fake H1N1 pandemic [3]: same tactics, same complicity (media, political, government), same “experts”, same scenarios, same narratives with an emphasis on fear, guilt, haste and always the same stench of this omnipresent money in the form of huge profits on the horizon for the Big Pharma vaccine producing industry.

It is as if the H1N1 episode of 2009 has been used as a rehearsal.

This time, the COVID-19 episode of 2020 is poised to turn the trial into a success?

Monitoring Tests: Collect data on VIDOC-19. Source:

2.  People submitting to authority

Despite clear signs of corruption, incompetence, ignorance about eminent personalities in politics, science, medicine, many people continue to obey them.

Despite confused, contradictory, unexplained, unjustifiable recommendations, people accept the directive of higher authority.

For example, many people continue to obey them:

1) In the midst of the epidemic, the wearing of masks is not mandatory and even discouraged for healthy people.
2) As the epidemic dies out, masks become mandatory everywhere for everyone.

Many general practitioners from several countries and the IHU Méditerranée-Infection de Marseilles, one of the largest infectious disease centers in the world, the largest in France, have demonstrated that hydroxychloroquine is  an effective drug for treatment of SARS and COVID-19 [4].

In Belgium, “they” say that it is a dangerous and ineffective drug and “they” prevent general practitioners from prescribing it to their patients. In the US, a media campaign against HCQis ongoing.

Contradictions, lies, false truths…

Of course, fear and conformism may explain this fabricated obedience.

We know the experiences of Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram [5].

This tendency to submission and obedience to coercive measures varies from one country to another.

Thus in Serbia :

“Broken, the relentless progression of coronaviral terror. The recalcitrant Serbs rebelled against their president when he ordered them to return to house arrest. After two days of street battles with dozens of hospitalized police officers, the robust demonstrators won; the authorities surrendered and abandoned their plans to seal off Belgrade. Shops, bistros and restaurants in Belgrade will have a curfew in the early evening; but this is much better than the complete closure they had planned. ” [6]

On the other hand, in Belgium:

“In an incomprehensible way, while the epidemic, except for small outbreaks (clusters), is gradually disappearing [7], coercive measures are once again being imposed, even extended [8] with compulsory wearing of masks everywhere, for everyone, obligation to give their details in restaurants and bars for tracking purposes [9] …”.

There is no justification for all this.

All this revives fear, terror, and leads to fears of a return to partial or total confinement (house arrest), whereas today we know that this measure is useless and harmful! [10-11]

It is as if the COVID-19 crisis is being used by the authorities as a full-scale test to assess the degree of submission of their people [12], and to see how far they can go before they encounter sufficient opposition.

I hope that the Belgian people, the bravest people of Gaul according to Julius Caesar [13], will have the courage and lucidity of the Serbian people and will finally wake up.

3. The use of experts by creating the impression of a consensus that does not exist

Governments form expert committees to justify their actions.

For the citizen, why question the measures in question?

However, within organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), the COVID-19 committee in France (CARE) or in Belgium (Sciensano-committee COVID-19), being an expert does not mean being independent, free of any conflict of interest, or even being competent from a standpoint [14-15].

Every time a government says: “there is a consensus of experts on this issue“, it is in fact a lie.

It only means that their experts have agreed, they have established a consensus without analysis and the conduct of scientific debate.

In COVID-19, you can find on all the subjects presented as a part of a consensus :

  • Masks
  • Hydroxychloroquine
  • Containment
  • Tests used
  • Treatments
  • Vaccination

… other experts equally valid in terms of academic credentials, reputation and professional activities, whose opinions go against official diktats, with honest arguments, solid demonstrations and multiple references.

How does the citizen weigh this up?

A good criterion is to check for a conflict of interest.

Many qualified authors and scientists with opinions opposed to those of their government counterparts are not linked to the pharmaceutical industry or to governments that ultimately want to push an ideology,  a political agenda and are increasingly accountable to Big Pharma.

These independent authors also have more to lose than to gain in this debate.

What else could drive them to take risks if not their honesty, their conscience?

It is neither fame, nor the hope of a contract in the private sector, nor money, in any case.

4. The fabrication of “fiction” may be inspired by a distorted understanding of real facts and for this, the use of a narrative that ends up being repeated over and over again, which then becomes a consensus which is no longer challenged.

COVID-19 is a fiction based on plausible facts: a virus, real deaths, a real disease, an epidemic of respiratory illnesses to which are added, little by little, distortions of truths or realities, or even outright lies (Cf. my series, COVID-19: as close to the truth as possible).

Coronaviruses are known. They exist. Two of them have already threatened humanity with deadly epidemics (SARS, MERS).

Regardless of the fact that the 2009 H1N1 pandemic was false and that experts had manipulated the figures, the H1N1 pandemic of 2009 set the stage for it is a threat and that only vaccination could save us.

Real sick people were hospitalized and some died. All of this made the “COVID-19” story plausible.

The COVID narrative was launched.

To perpetuate the fear campaign, a population-wide strategy of shock was put in place, tests presented as reliable were conducted, high mortality figures were released. not to mention indicators of contagiousness.

In this process, the role of the media in support of an official consensus was essential.

As always, they played their role well, announcing the number of deaths every day and attributing them to COVID-19 without supporting analysis.

Today,  the fear campaign is sustained by an alleged second wave, requiring a new lockdown. So-called “positive”| PCR tests are casually presented as new cases of COVID-19.

Sweden and other countries, as well as some states in the USA, have not played the game, or have followed their own agenda.

Stockholm during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Source: Quartz

They didn’t confine, they were less traumatized, they remained more human.

They is proof that the COVID-19 story in several countries (Belgium, France, Spain, Canada…) is indeed a fiction, based on manipulated data, plunging millions of people into a formidable “psychological trap”.

The COVID-19 story is a strategy of “shock therapy”. Strategies of this nature (implying social engineering) are never used for the good of the people.

The strategy of psychological shock is a reality, studied by several authors and researchers, including Naomi Klein [16], with her book published in 2007, “The Strategy of Shock: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism”.

The aim is to make a tabula rasa, a blank page, and on this blank page, to reconstruct what we want.

How can we do this?

“On the scale of an entire population, by destroying a country’s heritage, its social and economic structures in order to build a new society, a new order after the planned and controlled chaos.

Once the people are deprived of their points of reference, shocked and infantilized, they find themselves defenceless and easily manipulated.

This process can occur following a serious economic or political crisis, an environmental disaster, an attack, a war or a health crisis. ” [17]

The strategy of shock was applied by economic means to Greece in the wake of the 2008 crisis, dragging millions of people into misery with the complicity of their politicians. [18]

The strategy of shock was applied by means of terrorism in the USA in 2001 and in France in 2015 with the establishment of states of emergency and emergency laws that have never again been abolished [19].

[19] The strategy of shock is now being applied by means of health crises, COVID-19, to a part of the world, including my country, Belgium.

“The terror induced on a large scale in a society leads to a kind of state of daze, a situation where control can easily be obtained from an external authority.

It is necessary to develop an immature state of mind in the population in order to control it as best as possible.

Society must be infantilized.

These ideas have been studied and disseminated by the Tavistock Institute in London, which originated from a psychiatric clinic founded in 1920, specializing in psychological control and organized social chaos [17].

It is much easier to run a society through mental control than through physical control, through infantilization, confusion, misinformation and fear.

Isn’t that what is at work today?

People are being infantilized…

They are told which sidewalk they can walk on, which way, when they can go into a store and where they have to blow their nose.

Fear is omnipresent.

Those who refuse the masks are penalized, looked at sideways, excluded, insulted, hated.

Thousands of people see their work threatened, their whole life compromised without the possibility of demonstrating, or opposing the Covid-19 consensus imposed by their government.

Old people are abandoned.

Young people are imprisoned in a masked and confined world.

Adults are in a precarious situation

People from the same family, separated.

Thinking and reflection, not to mention dialogue and debate are paralysed.

Protest is prohibited

If this thesis is correct, it is to be expected that our government, through “experts” and media interposed, will continue this strategy of shock and announce us more and more infected, dead and waves of COVID, irrespective of the underlying reality. The facts will be manipulated.

The examples of Sweden and Belgrade are beacons of hope in this dark perspective.

Dr. Pascal Sacré, physician specialized in critical care, author and renowned public health analyst, Charleroi, Belgium. Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)

Translation from French by Maya, Global Research

Featured image: Surveillance company. source:

Note to readers: please click on the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your mailing lists. Publish this article on your blog site, web forums, etc.


[1] Coronavirus: l’OMS tente de mobiliser politiques et acteurs économiques en vue d’ »un vaccin pour tous » sur la planète

[2] « Le chiffre de la mortalité due au coronavirus est un faux chiffre » selon le Dr. Lass

[3] Grippe H1N1, exemple de manipulation internationale, AIMSIB, 22 octobre 2018

[4] Bulletin d’information scientifique de l’IHU, Pr Philippe Parola, directeur de service de soins et d’unité de recherche à l’IHU Méditerranée Infection

[5] PSY-OP COVID-19 : assignés à résidence !, Dr Pascal Sacré,, 11 mai 2020

[6] Belgrade libérée, par Israel Shamir,, 13 juillet 2020

[7] La virulence du Covid-19 est-elle en train de diminuer ?, par Christophe De Brouwer,, 21 juillet 2020

[8] Les décisions du Conseil National de Sécurité. Les décisions ont été communiquées aux Belges à 13h30 lors d’une conférence de presse ce 24 juillet 2020

[9] Voici à quoi ressemble le formulaire-type pour l’enregistrement des clients horeca

[10] COVID-19 : au plus près de la vérité. Confinement, Dr Pascal Sacré,, 22 juillet 2020

[11] Confinement strict, surcharge hospitalière et surmortalité, PDF, mai 2020

[12] Opération COVID-19: Tester le degré de soumission des peuples, Dr Pascal Sacré,, 26 avril 2020

[13] Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae, Wikipédia, “Of all the peoples of Gaul, the Belgians are the bravest”, often translated into French as “Of all the peoples of Gaul, the Belgians are the bravest.

[14] Politique et corruption à l’OMS, Dr Pascal Sacré,, 12 janvier 2010, réédité le 14 avril 2020

[15] Et les conflits d’intérêts, on en parle ?, 5 mai 2020.

[16] La Stratégie du choc : la montée d’un capitalisme du désastre (titre original : The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism) est un essai socio-politique altermondialiste publié en 2007 par la journaliste canadienne Naomi Klein. Wikipédia

[17] MK Abus rituels et Contrôle Mental, Alexandre Lebreton, éditions Omnia Veritas, 2016

[18] Stratégie du choc : comment le FMI et l’Union européenne bradent la Grèce aux plus offrants, Agnès Rousseaux, Bastamag, 20 juin 2013

[19] Quand la fin justifie les moyens : stratégie du choc et état d’urgence, 29 novembre 2016The original source of this article is Mondialisation.caCybersecurity Companies Selling Hyper-control Technology to Governments to “Prevent Pandemics”Copyright © Dr Pascal Sacré,, 2020The original source of this article is Mondialisation.caCopyright © Dr. Pascal Sacré,, 2020

Related Articles:

Covid-19: Phase 1 of the “Permanent Crisis”?

Vietnam’s Success Against COVID-19

Popular Uprising against Covid Lockdown. Belgrade Liberated! The Government Surrenders

Looks Like Sweden Was Right After All

COVID-19 Could Kill More People Through Hunger than the Disease Itself, Warns Oxfam

COVID-19 Cases in Africa Rising SharplyJul 9, 2020

Posted in HealthComments Off on The True Face of Covid-19: Fear and “Shock Therapy” to Impose a Totalitarian Society?

Elon Musk Confesses to Lithium Coup in Bolivia

The billionaire CEO of Tesla and lithium-exploiting capitalist has admitted his role in the November coup.

The CEO of the U.S.-based Telsa car manufacturer has admitted to involvement in what President Morales has referred to as a “Lithium Coup.”

“We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it.” was Elon Musk’s response to an accusation on twitter that the U.S. government organized a coup against President Evo Morales, so that Musk could obtain Bolivia’s lithium.

Foreign plunder of Bolivia’s lithium, in a country with the world’s largest known reserves, is widely believed to be among the main motives behind the November 10, 2019 coup.

Lithium, a critical component of the batteries used in Tesla vehicles, is set to become one of the world’s most important natural resources as manufacturers seek to obtain it for use in batteries for electric cars, computers, and industrial equipment.

The defacto administration of Jeanine Añez has already announced its plan to invite numerous multinationals into the Salar de Uyuni, the vast salt flats in Potosi, which holds the precious soft metal.

Right-wing Vice Presidential candidate and running mate to Añez, Samuel Doria Medina, proposed a Brazilian-Bolivian project which would use lithium from the town of Uyuni.

Meanwhile, letter from the coup regime’s Foreign Minister Karen Longaric to Elon Musk, dated march 31st, says “any corporation that you or your company can provide to our country will be gratefully welcomed.”Bolivian Coup Comes Less than a Week After Morales Stopped Multinational Firm’s Lithium Deal

Social movements have repeatedly warned that lithium and natural resources would be surrendered to foreign capital by coup authorities, in a reversal of plans by Evo Morales’ Movement Towards Socialism (MAS) administration to process the lithium within Bolivia rather than exporting the raw material to the global north.

The project represented a rejection of the neocolonial relationship Latin American countries have often had with the imperialist cores.

Bolivia’s former MAS government oversaw the production of batteries and its first electric car by the Yacimientos de Litio Bolivianos (YLB) state company, in partnership with German company ACISA. In the deal, the Bolivian state kept majority control.

With the agreement now scrapped along with countless other state projects, and with elections now thrice delayed by the illegitimate defacto authorities, the people of Uyuni and social movements around the country say they’ll continue to oppose the ongoing privatization and are organizing against the return of looting of Bolivia’s natural resources by ruthless and exploitative foreign capital.

Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

Featured image: Tesla CEO Elon Musk (L) Authorities of Chayanta (R), Norte Potosi, Bolivia. May 24, 2020 | Photo: Twitter/ @KawsachunCoca

Posted in USA, ZIO-NAZI, Bolivia, C.I.AComments Off on Elon Musk Confesses to Lithium Coup in Bolivia

Shoah’s pages