Kenyan machete killer who butchered 400 people in his homeland can stay in UK on benefits

NOVANEWS
  • John Thuo, 27, killed hundreds as part of criminal Mungiki sect in Nairobi
  • Granted asylum after living in rent-free accomodation in Coventry for 10 years
  • Threatened to kill himself if he was deported to Kenya, where gang could have him beheaded for treachery

By ANDY DOLAN

John Thuo's semi-detached home in Coventry is funded by the taxpayer. After spending ten years in the UK, he has been granted asylum for the next threeJohn Thuo’s semi-detached home in Coventry is funded by the taxpayer. After spending ten years in the UK, he has been granted asylum for the next three

A murderer who killed up to 400 people in his homeland has been granted asylum in Britain.

John Thuo, 27, who butchered many of his victims in machete attacks in his native Kenya, has spent a decade living here in rent-free accommodation provided by the National Asylum Support Service.

He is believed to receive an allowance of up to £160 a month from the service, the Home Office unit responsible for asylum seekers’ housing.

Thuo, who was a member of the outlawed Mungiki sect in Kenya, admitted at an immigration tribunal that he killed ‘about 100 to 400 people’.

He also took part in female genital mutilation.

He was granted leave to remain in the UK for three years after an appeal, under the Human Rights Act, to the Immigration and Asylum Chamber.

He says deporting him would infringe his human rights because he would face execution by the sect on his return.

Approached at his home in suburban Coventry, where neighbours knew nothing about his brutal history, he said: ‘It’s true – I killed a lot of people. I don’t like talking about my past. I feel guilty for what I’ve done. I feel remorse.’

Thuo, who has done a stint as a removal man in the UK, said: ‘I’ve started a new life here and I’m looking for regular work. If I go back, they’ll behead me.’

Asked if he is monitored by the Home Office, he said: ‘No, I don’t have to meet anyone. I’m free.’

One of his neighbours in the West Midlands city said: ‘I had no idea about him killing all those people. It’s terrifying. There’s a lot of children who live in this street.’

The neighbour added: ‘He’s quite a big drinker. He’ll buy bottles of vodka and get drunk. When he does that he gets aggressive.’

Thuo’s appeal against being removed from the UK was granted in March after an expert witness testified that Mungiki members were known to behead those who had fled the organisation.

The judge also took into consideration Thuo’s mental health, and threats that he would kill himself if he was deported.

After his three years are up, he will have to apply for an extension or be removed.Thuo told the hearing in London he had joined the Mungiki in Nairobi when he was just ten, but rose through the ranks to become a senior member running a security racket.

Thuo (pictured right, green hoodie) lives in Coventry, where he kept his identity a secret until he needed NHS help for mental health problemsThuo (pictured right, green hoodie) lives in Coventry, where he kept his identity a secret until he needed NHS help for mental health problems

In 2002 he took part in a revenge attack on villagers who had killed two members of the sect. He butchered two civilians with a machete. In another incident, he killed two police officers.

The Mungiki was outlawed in Kenya in 2002, and Thuo arrived here as an illegal immigrant in August 2003.

He kept his identity a secret until he needed NHS help for mental health problems.

Paul Flynn, the Labour MP for Newport, said: ‘It is extremely worrying that someone who has admitted to killing so many people is not being investigated by the police in this country.

And it is even more worrying he is able to successfully claim asylum despite what he says he has done.’

A spokesman for the Aegis Trust, which campaigns to prevent crimes against humanity, said: ‘Anyone suspected of international crimes should be held to account.’

The Home Office said: ‘We are disappointed by the tribunal’s decision, but we can only appeal when a specific error of law is identified in the ruling. In this case there were no grounds for appeal.’

Posted in UK0 Comments

‘Stop and search’ harassment continues in Belfast

NOVANEWS

 

éirígí activists faced yet more harassment by the PSNI as they left a peaceful kerbside protest at the International Wall on the Falls Road in Belfast at the weekend.

Dozens of activists and supporters had gathered at the wall on Saturday (May 18) to show support and solidarity for their imprisoned comrade, Stephen Murney. Stephen has now been “interned by remand” in Maghaberry prison for almost six months at the behest of the PSNI.

Demonstration for Stephen Murney

As some activists left to attend a republican commemoration in the North Belfast area, a PSNI vehicle, part of a wider surveillance operation targeting the picket, followed the activists from the West of the city and on to the Antrim Road where their vehicle was forced to stop and pull over.

There the vehicle’s contents were ‘emptied’ onto the roadside and the occupants were subjected to body searches and questions about their movements and destination. It was clear that the intended stop and search was nothing more than an attempt to harass and delay those present. That fact became quite obvious as the PSNI searched only the boot of the car but nowhere else. They didn’t open a single car door or even look inside – all of which indicates a complete lack of genuine concern regarding the vehicle and its occupants.

At the roadside and in pouring rain, activists were spread-eagled by the PSNI as they were searched under ‘section 21’ and ‘section 24’ of the ‘Justice and Security Act’.

However, the PSNI soon found their ‘security operation’ being subjected to an unexpected intervention.

A legal professional who had been driving past the scene of the ‘stop and search’ stopped his own vehicle and began to question the legality of the PSNI’s actions, thereby forcing the PSNI to bring a swift end to their highly questionable activity on this occasion.

Delivering judgment in a recent court case at the Court of Appeal on Thursday 9th May, British Lord Justice Girvan identified the absence of a code of practice for stop and question operations under Section 21 of the above quoted act. He said the legal framework did not contain the kind of safeguards against potential abuse or arbitrariness envisaged by the European Court in Strasbourg.

In the aftermath of that judgment, such a code of practice was then rushed through Westminster on 15th May. Entitled a “Code of Practice for the Exercise of Powers in the Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007”, it is supposed to provide, for PSNI officers exercising these draconian powers, a legal framework for operating and using the powers enclosed in the Justice and Security Act in question.

By completely ignoring this ‘Code of Practice’ on Saturday, the PSNI has signalled its intent to continue abusing ‘stop and search’ powers in the same manner they frequently did in the past.

From the British government’s viewpoint, the hasty introduction of the new ‘Code of Practice’ was not an exercise aimed at ensuring the protection of human rights but was a mere box-ticking exercise designed with the purpose of fore-stalling possible European examination of so-called ‘emergency’ laws in the Six Counties.

That was visibly demonstrated by the PSNI on Saturday.

Undeterred, but later than intended, the éirígí activists then made their way to their intended destination.

Posted in UK0 Comments

Julian Assange: UK Spy Messages Suggest He is Being Framed

NOVANEWS

‘I am fine, I am doing the work of my life’

- Craig Brown, staff writer

Screenshot from Spanish TV’s Salados, May 19, 2013.

Speaking during an interview with Spanish television program Salvados, which aired on Sunday, WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange said that he has received a series of unclassified instant message exchanges from UK intelligence officials suggesting that he is being framed.

Assange filed a ‘Special Access Request’ under the UK’s Data Protection Act asking the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) for copies of all unclassified documents referencing Assange.

“They are trying to arrest him on suspicion of XYZ, it’s definitely a fit-up though. Their timings are too convenient right after Cablegate.”Assange has spent the past 11 months in the Ecuadorian embassy in London to avoid arrest and extradition to Sweden for alleged sexual assault charges.

Assange told the interviewer: “If I walked out the front door immediately I would be arrested that would either be an arrest for a sealed indictment from the United States for the investigation that is occurring there or it would be an arrest for an extradition to Sweden followed by an extradition from Sweden to the United States.”

“And just recently we used this from GCHQ. We have just received this. It is not public yet. GCHQ which the electonic spying agency in Britain equivalent of the United States National Security Agency. It of course won’t hand over any of the classified information,” he told interviewer Jordi Évole. “But, much to its surprise, it has some unclassified information on us. It had some instant messaging between its spies,” he said.

The first instant message conversation from August 31, 2012 reads:

“You’ve seen Assange’s prediction?”
“No”
“He reckons he will stay in the Ecuadorian embassy for six to 12 months then the charges against him will be dropped, but that is not really how it works now is it?
“He’s a fool”
“Yeah”
“A highly optimistic fool”

“Another one here from September last year:”

“They are trying to arrest him on suspicion of XYZ, it’s definitely a fit-up though. Their timings are too convenient right after Cablegate.”

“This is what their spies are discussing among themselves,” Assange added.

(CD Editors note: UsingEnglish.com defines “fit-up” as meaning: “To frame someone – make them look guilty of something they haven’t done.”

“We made a request to the police here, the government has already admitted it cost £4.5m to surround this embassy with police, but they won’t hand over any documents under the Freedom of information Act because it “concerns an investigation.” We know there is no investigation,” he told the interviewer Jordi Évole.

“Everything I say in email or SMS can be used in espionage prosecution. The US is finding ways to make everything classified.”

“Journalists want to hear that I am suffering, but I am fine, I am doing the work of my life so even in quite difficult circumstances it is satisfying,” he said.

“Sometimes I wonder if I have overstepped the mark, but the work I am doing is so satisfying to my principles that I am firm in my convictions that it was worth it.”

The interview with Salvados below. (Questions are in Spanish; Assange answers in English)

 

Posted in Campaigns, UK0 Comments

Poll : Half of Britons Want EU Exit

NOVANEWS

 

Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem, Sr

A new poll shows almost half of British voters, 46 percent, want Britain to exit the European Union.

 

European Union Politics

Press TV

According to the new ICM poll for The Sunday Telegraph nearly half of Britons answered “no” to the question of “Do you think that the UK should remain a member of the EU”. The figure was the highest than in other recent surveys with only 30 percent saying they want Britain to remain in the union.

The recent poll, which is considered as a boost for the eurosceptic cause, showed that 44 percent of Britons want an “in/out” referendum immediately, while 29 percent said they are prepared to wait until 2017, Prime
Minister David Cameron’s preferred option.

Almost 31 percent picked David Cameron as the most trusted authority to enter talks with the EU on the UK’s behalf. Nigel Farage (UK Independence Party’s chief) was the second most trusted, marginally ahead of Ed Miliband the head of the opposition Labour Party, although both men are on 18 percent when numbers are rounded up. Nick Clegg, Liberal Democratic party chief came last on just four percent, the poll showed.

Meanwhile, Labour party’s popularity fell four points from last month to 32 percent, with the Conservatives down one on 29 percent and the Liberal Democrats also down one on 16 percent.

Voters believe UKIP will win 15 percent of the vote in the 2015 general election – a high figure which underlines the party’s recent good results in parliamentary by-elections and local council ballots.

 

Posted in UK0 Comments

ARCH AZZ GREENSTEIN SURRENDERED

NOVANEWS
GILAD ATZMON

By Gilad Atzmon

In the last few weeks we have witnessed more than a few humanists abandoning the Palestinian solidarity sinking dingy.

Veteran BBC celebrity Alan Hart, the person who devoted the last 3 decades to the Palestinian cause and provided us with some spectacular analysis, decided to call it a day. A week later we learned from Haaretz, that Prof’ Norman Finkelstein, possibly one of the most profound academic contributors to the discourse, was also tired of ‘Israeli bashing’. Stuart Littlewood, probably the boldest pro Palestinian writer in Britain, admitted that he is also close to take a similar decision. Hart, Littlewood  and Finkelstein expressed their  dismay for more than a while and their concerns, although varied, have been shared by many, at least in part, including your truly.

But our humanists are not the only one to manifest fatigue.  Even the AZZs are drifting away now. Apparently UK leading tribal operator Tony Greenstein has also given up.

Using his favourite colour (red) to announce his departure yesterday, Tony he wrote on his blog “As Anti-semitism in the Palestine Solidarity Movement has all but vanished the purpose of this blog has become redundant”

This is indeed a sad day. Tony was my favourite cyber stalker and he will be missed. I would love to use the opportunity to not only wish him the best but also to thank him from the bottom of my heart for all the hard work he invested into promoting my work and helping to make The Wandering Who into a best seller.

Tony makes it pretty clear what led him to his regrettable decision. According to him, the Judeification of the Palestinian Solidarity has been completed. To a certain extent Tony is correct: the actions of UK PSC expelling Palestinians, and monitoring the BDS changing its goal statement in a clandestine manner just to appease the Jews suggest clear Judeification.  Watching Electronic Abunimah and BDS harassing truth tellers in accordance with Biblical Hebraic herem culture is another serious concern.

Yet, the success of The Wandering Who may suggest something else. I am now touring relentlessly around the world for more than 2 years exploring the true meaning of Jewish identity politics and Jewish Power. It is clear beyond any doubt that more and more people do realise that Zionism is just one symptom of Jewish power. With 30.000 drones  flying over the USA, the people of Chicago, LA and Denver  have a lot in common with the people of Gaza.  The shift from Promised Land to Promised Planet is now a Western reality that has one clear meaning: we are all Palestinians and Palestinian solidarity starts at home. It starts with our capacity of identifying the enemy within.

Watch Greenstein at the peak of his solidarity career:

http://blip.tv/auntie-ziona/mony-gripstein-versus-the-anti-zmites-950507

As we move along more and more people  realise that Palestine and Zionism are just part of the problem. We are now digging extensively into Jewish power, the theory, the practice, the manifestations, Zionism and the links with the Left and the progressives, the role of political correctness, marginal politics and so on.  I myself am pursuing now a far deeper research into those subjects and I can already confirm that my new book will reveal a theoretical breakthrough in the understanding of the Progressive, the left and the fatal institutional failure of the international solidarity movement.

I don’t know what led to Tony Greenstein retirement. But if he is available and needs a real change, I would offer him a place in my band wagon as a roadie. We could use a  Bolshevik veteran commissar to spice things up. For a change,  he will work with a collective jazz band and get a chance to explore how beauty and humanism are transformed into bread and butter.

The Wandering Who? A Study Of Jewish Identity Politics and Jewish ‘Left’ in particular    Amazon.com  orAmazon.co.uk

 

Posted in Campaigns, UK0 Comments

Prince Charles’ money exploitation

Posted in UK0 Comments

Homelessness Could Be A Crime Under Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill Warns Think Tank

NOVANEWS

PA/The Huffington Post UK

Homelessness could be turned into a crime under proposed anti-social behaviour laws a think-tank has warned.

The Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing bill, which featured in the Queen’s Speech earlier this month, includes powers to ban certain activities from designated areas.

The Manifesto Club claims these Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs) are more wide-ranging than the powers they will replace while including fewer checks on their use leaving them open to exploitation.

homelessness crime

Thousands of people sleep rough in the UK
 

Josie Appleton, Manifesto Club director, said:”There is widespread evidence of the over-use of existing powers, which are already too broad and have been employed unjustly to interfere with law-abiding individuals.

“The danger posed by these new powers is substantially greater.

“We believe that the Government has underestimated the potential for abuse of these powers and failed to introduce sufficient checks and balances.”

As currently drafted, the PSPOs could be used by councils for actions including banning spitting, banning homeless or young people from parks, banning begging or rough sleeping and banning smoking in outdoor public places, the group warned.

It also claimed that PSPOs have fewer legal or democratic checks and require less public consultation than alcohol-control zones or dog-control zones.

The orders can also be directed at particular groups, the think-tank says, raising the possibility of discrimination.

Appleton added: “No doubt some local authorities would use these new powers proportionately, but we can be sure that others would not.

“Public Space Protection Orders urgently need to be subjected to additional checks and limitations to ensure that they are used proportionately and do not interfere with the rights of those who use public spaces.”

Posted in UK0 Comments

Church of Scotland report challenging Jews’ ‘divine right’ to Palestinian homeland unchanged

NOVANEWS
STUART LITTLEWOOD

Impertinent complaints politely sidestepped

 

The General Assembly Hall of the Church of Scotland, Edinburgh. Photo: Wikimedia

by Stuart Littlewood

The Church of Scotland’s revised report ‘The Inheritance of Abraham?’ has now been released ahead of their Assembly http://www.churchofscotland.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/14050/The_Inheritance_of_Abraham.pdf .

The Church felt obliged to change some of it after Jewish leaders sought to interfere, one complaining that it was “an outrage to everything that interfaith dialogue stands for…  and closes the door on meaningful dialogue”. Another said “it reads like an Inquisition-era polemic against Jews and Judaism.”

The Israeli ambassador moaned that it belittled the deeply held Jewish attachment to the land of Israel in a way which was “truly hurtful”.

So do the changes amount to a caving–in to Zionist meddlers?

I soon gave up comparing the two versions word for word to spot the difference. The press release gives no clues either. In it, Convener Sally Foster-Fulton simply says:

Sally Foster-Fulton

“We believe that this new version has paid attention to the concern some of the language of the previous version caused amongst the Jewish community whilst holding true to our concerns about the injustices being perpetrated because of policies of the Government of Israel against the Palestinian people that we wanted to highlight. The views of this report are consistent with the views held by the Church of Scotland over many years.”

Cool under fire, this lady.

The report’s key conclusion remains that “the Church of Scotland does not agree with a premise that scripture offers any peoples a divine right to territory”. At least they stand firm on that.

They also recap on what they already believe, and here’s where disagreements might flare up. For example…

·       Israel is a recognised State and has the right to exist in peace and security.”

Yet Israel’s right to exist seems somehow inconsistent with the Church’s statement that scripture does not bestow a divine right to someone else’s land. Even if the Church believes that the UN’s 1947 Partition Plan was morally and legally right, what does it say to the Jewish terror groups that were driving Palestinians from their homes before the ink was dry and before the state of Israel was declared? What about the hundreds of towns and villages not even allocated to the Jewish state in the UN Plan but erased by Israel in order to implant itself. What about the systematic ethnic cleansing and the criminal occupation of additional Arab territories in the 1967 war? Perhaps the Church should remain silent on the ‘right to exist’ question, at least until Israel declares its internationally recognised boundaries and halts its illegal expansion.

·       “There should be a Palestinian State, recognised by the United Nations, that should have the right to exist in peace and security.”

Israel doesn’t recognise the Palestinians’ right to a state.

·       “We condemn racism and religious hatred.”

The Jewish state is a racist entity.

·       “We are especially concerned at the recent actions of the Government of Israel in its support for settlements, for the construction of the security barrier or ‘the Wall’ within Occupied Territory, for the blockade of Gaza and for the anti-Boycott law.”

“Recent” actions? Israel has been building illegal settlements since 1967. Gaza has been blockaded since 2006. The West Bank has lived under permanent blockade for decades.

·       “We assert our sincere belief that to be critical of the policies of the Israeli Government is a legitimate part of our witness and we strongly reject accusations of anti-Semitic bias. We regularly engage with and critique policies of all Governments, where we deem them to be contrary to our understanding of God’s wish for humanity.”

Well said.

Central to the Church’s discussion is this excellent passage…

“To Christians in the 21st century, promises about the land of Israel shouldn’t be intended to be taken literally, or as applying to a defined geographical territory; The ‘promised land’ in the Bible is not a place, so much as a metaphor of how things ought to be among the people of God. This ‘promised land’ can be found or built anywhere.”

The report’s key conclusions appear the same as before. Christians should not be supporting any claims by any people to an exclusive or even privileged divine right to possess particular territory… It is a misuse of the Hebrew Bible (the Christian Old Testament) and the New Testament to use it as a topographic guide to settle contemporary conflicts over land.

And regarding Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory the Church remains committed to the following principles (previously set out and agreed by the General Assembly):

That the current situation is characterised by an inequality in power, therefore reconciliation can only be possible if the Israeli military occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the blockade of Gaza, are ended.

The Church of Scotland condemns violence, terrorism and intimidation no matter the perpetrator

The Church of Scotland affirms the right of Israelis and Palestinians to live within secure and fixed boundaries in states of their own.

The Israeli settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank are illegal under international law.

The Church of Scotland should do nothing to promote the viability of the illegal settlements on Palestinian land.

That human rights of all peoples should be respected, and this should include the right of return and / or compensation for Palestinian refugees.

That negotiations between the Government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority about peace with justice must resume at the earliest opportunity and the Church of Scotland should continue to put political pressure on all parties to commence such negotiations, and asking all parties to recognise the inequality in power which characterises this situation.

That there are safe rights of access to the sacred sites for the main religions in the area.

This stance seems pretty robust to me, and the Church’s support for refugees’ right of return is very welcome. However it also raises questions. Why, having already emphasised that the crisis in the Holy Land is characterised by “an inequality of power”, call for the two sides to be thrown together again in fruitless negotiations? Negotiate what? Freedom? Is that negotiable? The return of stolen lands and property? Is that negotiable? These matters are already decided by international and humanitarian law and numerous UN resolutions waiting to be enforced. How can the Church approve so-called ‘negotiations’ while one party is still under illegal occupation with a gun to his head? What justice is likely to come out of that? The Church does urge the UK Government and the European Union “to do all that is within their power to ensure that international law is upheld”, but that surely must come first, rather than relying on discredited talks.

The report going in front of the Church’s Assembly appears unchanged in substance and has cleverly sidestepped objections. The only caving-in, so far, has been the senior clergy’s agreement to listen to the Zionists’ impertinent demands in the first place.

I can only wish the Assembly an enjoyable week ahead and, on this issue, firm judgement.

 

Posted in Campaigns, UK0 Comments

France v UK? Hollande vows to ‘go on offensive’ as London ‘splinters’ EU

Posted in France, UK0 Comments

300 police officers gagged at cost of up to £250,000 each

NOVANEWS

More than 300 police officers have been gagged at the taxpayers’ expense at a cost of up to £250,000 each.

The Government has banned gagging orders for NHS employees after it emerged that £18million has been spent on silencing 600 staff.

However, a survey using Freedom of Information laws has found that the orders are also widely used across police forces, leading to concerns that whistleblowers are being silenced.

Stephen Barclay, a Conservative member of the Public Accounts Committee, said: “It is very concerning to hear that police officers with issues of concern which are in public interest appear to have been silenced through gagging clauses.

“These agreements have a clear effect beyond those who sign them because other officers with ambition will see what has happened to those who have concerns and decide to stay silent.”

A total of 13 police forces confirmed that they had signed 362 compromise agreements with staff, most of which contained confidentiality clauses.

Many forces declined to respond to the requests, however, meaning the true number is likely to be significantly higher.

The Metropolitan Police has signed 230 of the agreements in the past seven years.

According to the forces 2011-12 accounts, the biggest payout was made to Martin Tiplady, the former head of human resources, who received £259,462 after signing one of the controversial agreements.

Sir Paul Stephenson, the former commissioner, received £176,838 after signing one of the agreements along with his £98,000 salary.

John Yates, who was previously Britain’s top anti-terrorism officer, received £86,000 on top of his £120,000 salary.

Both men resigned amid growing controversy over the Metropolitan Police’s links to the News of the World, the now defunct tabloid newspaper at the centre of the phone hacking scandal.

They were cleared of any misconduct after an inquiry by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

Lancashire Constabulary has signed 34 compromise agreements with former employees in the year alone, while Surrey Police has signed 28 agreements over the past three years at a total cost to the taxpayer of £614,000.

Greater Manchester Police confirmed it has signed 14 agreements in the past three years while Nothumbria Police has signed 17 and Norfolk Constabulary 10.

Steve Williams, chairman of the Police Federation, said: “Police officers should be able say what they like without worrying about breaching confidentiality agreements. If things are not right they should be able to say so.

“There is a fear factor for officers who want to speak out but don’t because they are concerned about the repercussions. It’s wrong, the police should be transparent.”

The Daily Telegraph has previously established that use of compromise agreements is widespread across both Whitehall and in local authorities.

Freedom of Information requests found that 200 civil servants and officials have signed compromise agreements in the past two years, at a total cost of £14million, along with 4,562 local authority workers.

A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said there were “undoubtedly benefits” to compromise agreements which reduced the risk of legal action.

A Lancashire Constabulary spokesman insisted that compromise agreements have “little or no link” to whistleblowing. Surrey Police said that its compromise agreements had been reached after legal advice.

Posted in UK0 Comments

Join our mailing list

* = required field

Archives