novanews

01 May 2013 

The Bahrain Center for Human rights expresses grave concern in regards to the well-being and safety of two women who are in detention since 20 Apr 2013; they have been denied family visits, and reportedly tortured to extract confessions.

Rayhana Al-Mosawi informed her lawyer, Manar Maki, in a short phone call on 29 April 2013 that she was beaten in detention, threatened with the arrest of her relatives, and threatened with electric shocks to force her into signing confessions.

Nafeesa Al-Asfoor informed her husband in a short phone call on 29 April 2013 that she was beaten during interrogation at the criminal investigation department, threatened with arrest of relatives and with electric shocks by masked men.

Both detainees have not been allowed to consult with a lawyer about their situation, or to receive visits from family members, since their arrest on 20 Apr 2013 from the Bahrain International Circuit where the Formula1 race was taking place. The lawyers for the two women submitted requests to the public prosecution to formally represent the detainees, but they have not received a response. The lawyer Entisar AlAsfoor said that the authorities ordered a visitation ban on the two detainees for 60 days.

The two women are being charged with terrorism acts after one of them was caught with a pillow under her dress, according to the Ministry of Interior statement (http://www.policemc.gov.bh/news_details.aspx?type=1&articleId=14173).

The BCHR renews its calls to the international community to apply pressure on Bahrain to stop the practice of systematic torture to force confessions on falsified charges. The BCHR calls for the immediate release of Nafeesa Al-Asfoor and Rayhana Al-Mosawi, and the dropping of all trumped-up charges against them.

NOVANEWS

NOVANEWS

NOVANEWS

VIDEO- BAHRAINI CITIZEN- You hope to escape God’s wrath? God will avenge us! Go on, shoot me! Shoot me if you dare, I won’t leave!” the man in the video says.

NOVANEWS

NOVANEWS

Zionist puppets Bahraini Foreign Minister has recently insulted Iranian people with a discourse governing the Al Khalifa regime officials far from diplomatic norms and conventions.Separation of Bahrain in 1971 brings the question to the fore that what international legal bases allowed British colonial power to separate Bahrain from motherland Iran.

According to official map registered by UN headquarters, Bahrain was an integral part of mainland Iran. At that time unfortunately, Iran’s weak and failed monarch distanced from the public and accepted Bahrain’s independence and separation to save his crown, making a large scar on hearts of Iranians forever.

At that time in 1970, British government arranged the scene in order to separate Bahrain, then 14th province of Iran. The colonialist Britain, disturbed by the spread of Shiism in southern coasts of the Persian Gulf, devised the great conspiracy of separation of Bahrain from its motherland, Iran. Then, the British government installed Bedouins and desert-dwellers from British puppet Al Khalifa tribe on Bahrain as governors, with the aid from Saudi influence.

A 15-per cent minority, later to form Al Khalifa regime, immigrated Bahrain to change its demographic features, and to bring about gradual decrease in Bahrain’s original settlers.

The original settlers were not allowed to properly give their voices to the referendum held illegally by the British government.

The majority of those participants in the referendum received money from the Britain and came from Pakistan, India, and Bangladesh.

U Thant, then the UN Secretary General, voiced his objection to the British excessive intervention in Bahrain internal affairs, but he was intimidated by UK and US.

The corrupt monarch, Pahlavi, was not so competent and by 1971, Bahrain was independent and separated from the motherland Iran.

After the fall and escape of Shah, and the success of the Islamic Revolution of 1979, it was expected that Islamic new state incite the international attention and condemn Bahrain’s illegal separation according to international legal system. Since Islamic Republic had taken a policy of détente, the Bahraini issue was overshadowed by Iraqi imposed war on Iran.

Al Khalifa rulers, disregarding the historical facts and its tiny size against the mainland Iran, mounted accusations far greater than their political weight on Iran with western support.

Bahraini rulers supported Saddam Hussein during the Iraqi war against Iran with lavish donations to Baghdad. However, Islamic Republic authorities winked at the Bahraini support of Iraq. This emboldened Bahrain rulers and, subsequently, they misconstrued the Iranian self-restraint as Iranian political and military weakness. Zionist Sheikh Khaled bin Ahmed Al Khalifa, Bahraini Foreign Minister has recently insulted Iranian people with a discourse governing the  Zionist puppet Al Khalifa regime officials, and far from diplomatic norms and conventions.

This type of rhetoric not only violates the sense of good neighborhood, but also intensifies the conflicts, where the real loser being Al Khalifa rulers.

The distorted image of the Iranian and international political atmosphere in the eyes of the Bahraini rulers, however has made them brazen to the Iranian nation, the political and demographic situations in the island are too shakier than its rulers may perceive.

So far, Iran has avoided any intervention intended to damage the Bahraini political scene by its hidden and evident capabilities, but if Al Khalifa family hate speech continues, Iran’s behavior would not be the same.

Iranian people have proved their peace-loving nature and its commitment to ethics, either moral or religious; but if the threshold is violated, then Saddam’s fate will happen to Al Khalifa family.

SH/EA

NOVANEWS

LYNN DE ROTHSCHILD-KISISNGER AT IISS

The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) held its Eighth Annual Middle East Regional Security Summit in Manama, Bahrain on December 7-9. The summit hosted panels which discussed the role of the U.S. in the Middle East, the influence of sectarian politics in regional security, as well as preparing for the “day after” in Syria.  Senator John McCain (R-AZ), U.S. Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, and Representative Charles Ruppersberger (D-MD) spoke during the First Plenary Session of the conference.

McCain observed that “the region now stands at a crossroads between two very different alternative futures.”  He lamented, “The greater danger now is understating the ability that America still has to help our friends and allies here to shape events in their region for the better.” McCain pointed out that, “There is a visceral sense among so many of the people and leaders in this region that they are not getting as much support from the United States as they desire. 

And this is the perception among so many civil society and opposition groups, including here in Bahrain, who recognize that America has national interests that it must look after, but who want America nonetheless to speak up more, and more often, on behalf of their peaceful democratic aspirations.” Yet, ”It is difficult to convince the American people right now that we need to be doing more in the world, not less,” he concluded.

Burns said, “It’s important for Americans… to understand that the Middle East is not all about us.

But if it’s not about us, the future of the region certainly matters a great deal to us.” He listed, “Security, continued support for political openness, democratic reforms, and successful post-revolutionary transitions, economic support, and a “re-energized effort to resolve regional conflicts,” as four keys to American policy in the Middle East. Burns noted that American, ”influence has obvious limits, but we’re far better off continuing to work with people and leaderships across the Middle East who want to shape trends and events in a positive direction, than we are if we simply wait for them to be shaped for us.”

Ruppersberger declared, “I am here today to say we will NOT pack up and leave the region. We have a history of long term, strategic partnership with the countries of the region and that will continue. Our common ground is the fight against terrorism. We need the Gulf States to be strategic, long term partners in the region.”

[ed notes:translation:we will keep supporting our vicious brutal non democratic dictatorships(client regimes)and will continue to foment the fake war on(of) terror,in order to justify our continual occupation and domination of region and its resources...the puppet king of course opened up the summit by highligthing his continual support and collusion on security matters with gcc and west....backround on iiss...meanwhile Bahrain regime threatened Sunnis to dismiss them from their jobs if they support the revolution now back to IISS- http://www.iiss.org/about-us/iiss-governance-and-advisory-structure/the-trustees/ 

He is Colonel of The Life Guards, Gold Stick to The Queen and Colonel Commandant of the SAS. He is a Director of N M Rothschild & Sons Limited; a Council Member of The International Institute of Strategic Studies; a Member of the Steering Committee of The Center for Strategic and International Studies,[PNAC-NEOCONS] Washington DC. 
————————————–
Ms Fleur de Villiers CMG- 

http://www.iiss.org/about-us/iiss-governance-and-advisory-structure/the-trustees/fleur-de-villiers/

From 1988 to 2003 she was public-affairs consultant to the De Beers Group of companies and – from 1988 to 1998 – to the Anglo American Corporation.
———————————————-
Mr Thomas Seaman -Honorary Treasurer of the IISS, Chairman of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Investment Committee 

http://www.iiss.org/about-us/iiss-governance-and-advisory-structure/the-trustees/thomas-seaman/

Trustee and Chairman of the Investment Committee of the Rhodes Trust  1989-1998: Managing Director,Merrill Lynch & Co. (Head of Asia Pacific, International Financial Institutions and Investment Banking Groups)  1978-1989:Various investment banking positions at Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney and Bankers Trust in New York, London and Japan International Institute for Strategic Studies 

http://www.freebase.com/view/en/international_institute_for_strategic_studies

The International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) is a British research institute (or think tank) in the area of international affairs. It describes itself as “the world’s leading authority on political-military conflict”. IISS has strong establishment links with former US and British government 

[ed notes:also see... (BS ALERT) GLOBALIST(ROTHSCHILD TIED) BRITTISH IMPERIAL MILITARY THINK TANK (IISS) AGAIN PUSHES LIES USING (DESTROYED) FAKE RAUL REYES LAPTOP

http://thenakedfacts.blogspot.com/2011/11/lynn-de-rothschild-kisisnger-at-iiss.html

Posted by Nysoulcontrolla aka Ali

NOVANEWS

 ZIONIST PUPPET ISA SHLOMO BINBIN KHALIF OF BAHRAIN

NOVANEWS

Fuad Hussein (Jordanian Writer)

Jordanian Political Forces’ Position on Bahrain Uprising:  Analysis of the Muslim Brotherhood Group,Youth and Partisan ForcesJordan’s official and popular stands on the Bahraini events were conflicting; the Jordanian Government›s official stand was absolutely biased in favor of the Bahraini Government owing to the nature of the unique relations between the two Royal Regimes. As a result, the Bahraini security and military structure depended in many respects on Jordan; particularly in terms of training and recruitment. Meanwhile, the position of the Jordanian Street, especially moves launched by youths spearheading the Jordanian Spring, was supportive of the Bahraini moves without any reservation.

The Jordan Parliament stand in this regard has been compatible with the Government stand. It is no surprise especially if we take into consideration the statements made by several Jordanian official figures that the Jordanian Parliamentary Elections of 2007 and 2010 were forged (1).On the whole, all political parties were initially supportive and backed the Bahraini people›s moves in line with their stance towards all Arab Spring movements. But stances thereafter started showing some difference and distinction, especially after accession to power by the Muslim Brotherhood in both of Egypt and Tunisia along with the outbreak of riots in Syria.

In fact, the Muslim Brotherhood Group in Jordan has changed its stance, thereby showing full-scale turnaround and taking sides with the Brotherhood Coalition that is aligned with the Gulf Petrodollars advocated by both Turkey and the West. However, the Pan-Arab and Leftist parties along with the Street movement reflecting the Jordanian Spring remained supportive of the Bahraini street movement.

[ed notes:click link for whole expose,due to format i can't post it here(the best parts)....author gives the indications why these forces are most likely there..

Posted by Nysoulcontrolla aka Ali