Tag Archive | "UK Zionist Labour Party"

UK: Zionist Labour Party treats Palestinian supporters as mentally ill


By Gilad Atzmon

If you need further evidence that Britain’s Labour Party is a dark political force that doesn’t deserve the light of day, the following will supply the confirmation you need.

Marianne Northam, 74, joined the Labour Party so she could cast a vote in favour of Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership as she believed him to be “a man with integrity and principles”.

As a true humanist of leftist orientation, Northam opposes bankers and is disgusted by Israel’s institutional racism and barbarism. It seems that such political inclinations are no longer welcome in Corbyn’s Labour Party. Northam was informed by the party that she was suspended and subject to investigation. She was warned not to share “the information she received from the party identifying the name of the person who has made the complaint against her, any witnesses, the allegations and the names of party staff dealing with the matter.” She was threatened that if she failed to follow their instructions, “the party reserves the right to take action to protect confidentiality, and you may be liable to disciplinary action for breach of the party’s rules”.

In the official letter that the party sends to its hundreds of suspended members, it advises the member to contact their GP to seek help for their mental condition. “You can contact your GP who can help you access support for your mental health and wellbeing,” the letter says. As if opposing Israel, Jewish politics or bankers is a matter of mental illness! And if you do not want to have the National Health Service involved, our “opposition” party provides an alternative: “The Samaritans are available 24/7. They offer a safe place for anyone to talk any time they like, in their own way – about whatever’s getting to them. Telephone 116 123.

For those who do not know, the Samaritans is a registered charity aimed at providing emotional support to anyone in emotional distress, struggling to cope, or at risk of suicide throughout the United Kingdom and Ireland, often through their telephone helpline.

Let us examine what Northam did that earned her both a suspension from the Labour Partly and the “need” for the support of mental health specialists.

The Labour Party questioned Northam about some Facebook postings.

I watched the video. It is critical of one banking family and its vast influence. The video doesn’t refer to the Rothschilds as Jews or Semites. It produces an argument that deserves attention, discussion and maybe refutation. But this is hardly the approach taken by our so-called “opposition”. Corbyn’s Labour is against all bankers except one specific family of oligarchs.

Here is what the Labour inquisitor wrote to Northam:

Do you agree with the sentiments expressed in this video?

Do you recognise that the Rothschilds/New World Order is an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory?

Labour is supposed to be against prejudice. Simply on the basis of the above question, Labour’s National Executive Committee board must be suspended from the Labour Party for prejudice in favour of one Jewish banking family that is apparently beyond criticism.

Watch Lord Rothschild discussing how his family created Israel and orchestrated the Balfour Declaration

Northam’s ultimate crime was being a Facebook friend of yours truly. It seems one wannabe musician named Steve Cooke was really upset by Northam circulating my writing as the following screenshot, provided by the Labour Party, reveals:

Let’s examine what are my “anti-Semitic” views.

Apparently, Northam posted to her Facebook page an article I wrote in 2013 titled,“Holocaust Day backfired”. Labour’s inquisitor interrogates Northam as follows:

Do you agree with the comment in this article, “In the context of the Holocaust Memorial Day, the verdict is clear – the Israelis learned something in Auschwitz, but apparently not the most obvious ethical lesson.”

Do you agree with the comment in the article, “I guess that those British Jews who came to their senses probably realised by now that imposing a Holocaust Memorial Day on the British people was a grave mistake. However, I am delighted with this commemoration day. It is indeed a very special opportunity we should all cherish. Every year we will use this commemoration to remind Israel and its lobby what we think of the Jewish State, its politics and its repellent operators in our midst.”

In a recent paper I provided a detailed explanation titled “Why the “Left” is dead in the water”, explaining why the Labour Party has been reduced to an assortment of people with limited intellectual and mental abilities. A person with a working brain would see that my comment argues that Israelis and Jews should demand that the Jewish State implement the universal moral of the holocaust. I often raise the question of how it is possible that Israel ethnically cleansed Palestine just three years after the liberation of Auschwitz. I ask, how is it possible that the Jewish State put into place racist immigration laws just five years after the defeat of Nazi Germany? I argue that the Jews should be among the first to apply the lesson of the holocaust. Instead, the Jewish State is, unfortunately, the most racist country in the world. And it enjoys the institutional support of Jews around the world as well as Corbyn’s Labour.

The Labour inquisitor writes to Northam:

The Chakrabarti Report states:

“Excuse for, denial, approval or minimisation of the holocaust and attempts to blur responsibility for it, have no place in the Labour Party.” Do you think your posts are against the spirit of this?

“Racial or religious tropes and stereotypes about any group of people should have no place in our modern Labour Party.” Do you think your posts are against the spirit of this?

I would like a Labour representative or Chakrabarti herself (the next time she pays a visit to one of my concerts) to point to where the denial, approval or minimization of the holocaust appears in my article. In fact, my argument relies on the opposite conclusion. I demand that Jews and Israelis be subject to scrutiny based on the moral lesson of the holocaust. I guess that someone in the Labour’s NEC must believe that Jews and Israel are beyond criticism. Maybe before they preach to us about discrimination, they should look in the mirror.

By rejecting the idea that the Jewish State apply the moral lesson of the holocaust, and by censuring such an ethical message as “detrimental to the party”, the party is admitting that it is a discriminatory institution that is removed from universal ethical thinking. The Labour Party is now openly racist and should be dissolved immediately in accordance with its own anti-prejudice rules.

The Labour inquisitor continues:

Rule 2.I.8 in the party’s rulebook states:

“No member of the party shall engage in conduct which in the opinion of the NEC is prejudicial, or in any act which in the opinion of the NEC is grossly detrimental to the party.”

This Kafkaesque statement alone provides ample reason for Northam to show the Labour party the finger as by now every Briton should do. But I will address the Labour inquisitor’s question.

By rejecting the idea that the Jewish State apply the moral lesson of the holocaust, and by censuring such an ethical message as “detrimental to the party”, the party is admitting that it is a discriminatory institution that is removed from universal ethical thinking. The Labour Party is now openly racist and should be dissolved immediately in accordance with its own anti-prejudice rules.

The Labour inquisitor adds:

The party’s Code of Conduct: Social Media Policy states that “treat all people with dignity and respect. This applies offline and online.” Do you think the posts in this pack are consistent with this policy?”

And I answer: how is it disrespectful to demand that the Jewish State be subject to the same rules as anyone else? In fact, it is Zionist to the core, as early Zionism promised, in Theodor Herzl’s pamphlet, Der Judenstaat, to make Jews a people like all others.

The Labour Party is institutionally bigoted. It discriminates in favour of a racist criminal state. It terrorises and harasses anyone who questions the criminal and genocidal conduct of that state. The Labour Party has little or nothing to do with Labour values let alone left-wing principles. It is a disgusting occupied body.

The Labour inquisitor ends his letter to Northam as follows:

Looking back at the evidence supplied with this letter, do you regret posting or sharing any of this content? Do you intend to post content of this nature in the future?

It seems that Northam has made up her mind. She has closed the door on this repellent, compromised party, and every thinking Briton should follow her. The Labour Party in its current form is an authoritarian Israeli hasbara unit. It may be the most dangerous party in Europe as it is deliberately endangering our most elementary human rights: the right to speak and think freely, the right to explore ethical and universal thinking and the need to criticise that which needs criticism.

Posted in ZIO-NAZI, UKComments Off on UK: Zionist Labour Party treats Palestinian supporters as mentally ill

UK Labour Party in grip of Zionist inquisition 


Misuse of anti-Semitism

By Stuart Littlewood

The orchestrated smear campaign against pro-Palestine sympathisers sent me reaching for my pen. But Gilad Atzmon too was eyeing the Labour Party’s crazed witch hunt for “anti-Semites” with misgiving and had already declared, in his usual robust way, that Labour under Jeremy Corbyn was not so much a party as a piece of Zionist-occupied territory.

Writing in his blog about Corbyn’s and McDonnell’s servile commitment to expel anyone whose remarks might be interpreted by Zionist mafioso as hateful or simply upsetting to Jews, Atzmon concludes: “Corbyn’s Labour is now unequivocally a spineless club of sabots goyim [which I take to mean non-Jewish dogsbodies who do menial jobs that Jews are forbidden to do for religious reasons].

“The Labour Party’s policies,” says Atzmon,

are now compatible with Jewish culture: intolerant to the core and concerned primarily with the imaginary suffering of one people only. These people are not the working class, they are probably the most privileged ethnic group in Britain. Corbyn’s Labour is a Zionist occupied territory… It proves my theses that the left is not a friend to Palestine, the oppressed or the workless people.

I would have never believed that Jeremy Corbyn would engage in such colossally treacherous politics. I did not anticipate that Corbyn would become a Zionist lapdog. Corbyn was a great hope to many of us. I guess that the time has come to accept that the left is a dead concept, it has nothing to offer.

This writer too is shocked after signing up as a supporter (though not a member) of the Labour Party with the express purpose of voting in the leadership election for that beacon of common sense, that staunch champion of high ideals, that great white hope who would start a revolution in British politics and sweep away the crap and corruption left behind by Blair and Brown.

Boy, was I in for a disappointment!

Zionist inquisitors

The latest casualty in this ugly Zionist power-play is former mayor of London Ken Livingstone. In a heated public spat with one of the party’s chief inquisitors, John Mann MP, he had the temerity to defend a female member of parliament, Naz Shah, who had fallen foul of the party’s anti-Semitism police for comments made on Facebook before becoming an MP.

She had suggested that Israel be transferred to the United States. She apologised profusely, but Labour’s Israel lobby went ballistic after raking up this old remark.

It scarcely needs saying that Zionism may mean self-determination for the Jewish people but it has cruelly denied the Palestinians their right to self-determination for decades.

Had they forgotten that their hero, David Ben-Gurion himself, was mad-keen on population transfer – of Palestinian Arabs, that is? So what’s to get excited about?

Mann happens to be chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Anti-Semitism. One-sidedness is the name of his game.

What seems to have generated greatest sound and fury is this observation by Livingstone:

When Hitler won his election in 1932 his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel. He was supporting Zionism before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews.

Joan Ryan MP, Chair of Labour Friends of Israel, said:

To speak of Zionism – the right of the Jewish people to self-determination – and Hitler in the same sentence is quite breathtaking. I am appalled that Ken Livingstone has chosen to do so… He should be suspended from the Labour Party immediately.

It scarcely needs saying that Zionism may mean self-determination for the Jewish people but it has cruelly denied the Palestinians their right to self-determination for decades. Nevertheless Livingstone is suspended from the party after 47 years.

The president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Jonathan Arkush, can be relied on to put in his two-pennyworth on these occasions, and he didn’t disappoint:

Ken Livingston’s comments were abhorrent and beyond disgraceful. His latest comments combine holocaust revisionism with anti-Semitism denial, when the evidence is there for all to see. He lacks any sense of decency. He must now be expelled from the Labour Party.

On the suspension of Naz Shah, Arkush was in overdrive:

If the Labour Party is to re-establish its credibility on this issue, it needs to take four important steps forward:

First, there must be a credible inquiry into the entire Naz Shah episode. Secondly, the party has to take effective measures to eradicate anti-Semitism wherever it occurs within its membership.  Thirdly, the leader must make it clear that allegations of anti-Semitism are not to be dismissed as arguments about Israel. Fourthly, Jeremy Corbyn must now respond to our repeated calls for him to accept that his meetings with rank anti-Semites before he became leader were not appropriate and will not be repeated.

Witch hunters’ balloon pricked

Whether Livingstone’s claim that Hitler was a Zionist is correct, I know not and care not. He presumably checked his facts and was itching to score with this mischievous titbit. Whether that was a wise thing to do is a matter for idle chatter, not expulsion. Meanwhile Zionist hotheads inside and outside the party would do well to pay attention to the The Jewish Socialists’ Group, which has some sound advice for them and sticks a pin in their not-so-pretty balloon with this measured statement:

Anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism are not the same. Zionism is a political ideology which has always been contested within Jewish life since it emerged in 1897, and it is entirely legitimate for non-Jews as well as Jews to express opinions about it, whether positive or negative. Not all Jews are Zionists. Not all Zionists are Jews.

Criticism of Israeli government policy and Israeli state actions against the Palestinians is not anti-Semitism. Those who conflate criticism of Israeli policy with anti-Semitism, whether they are supporters or opponents of Israeli policy, are actually helping the anti-Semites. We reject any attempt, from whichever quarter, to place legitimate criticism of Israeli policy out of bounds.

Accusations of anti-Semitism are currently being weaponised to attack the Jeremy Corbyn-led Labour Party with claims that Labour has a “problem” of anti-Semitism. This is despite Corbyn’s longstanding record of actively opposing fascism and all forms of racism, and being a firm a supporter of the rights of refugees and of human rights globally.

A very small number of such cases seem to be real instances of anti-Semitism. Others represent genuine criticism of Israeli policy and support for Palestinian rights, but expressed in clumsy and ambiguous language, which may unknowingly cross a line into anti-Semitism. Further cases are simply forthright expressions of support for Palestinian rights, which condemn Israeli government policy and aspects of Zionist ideology, and have nothing whatsoever to do with anti-Semitism.

The Jewish Socialists’ Group goes further and suggests that the attacks come from four main sources: the Conservative Party, Conservative-supporting media and pro-Zionist Israeli media sources, right-wing and pro-Zionist elements claiming to speak on behalf of the Jewish community, and opponents of Jeremy Corbyn within the Labour Party. These groups make common cause to wreck the Corbyn leadership, divert attention from Israeli government crimes and discredit those who dare to criticise Israeli policy or the Zionist enterprise.

In short, the Jewish Socialists’ Group says what needs to be said and puts the witch hunter generals firmly in their place.

Of course, if Labour – or the Conservatives – truly wished to be squeaky-clean in matters of racism they would disband their Israel fan clubs (i.e. Friends of Israel) and suspend all who refuse to condemn Israel’s brutal acts of ethnic cleansing and other war crimes. If people holding public office put themselves in a position where they are influenced by a foreign military power, they flagrantly breach the Principles of Public Life. There are far too many Labour and Conservative MPs and MEPs who fall into that category.

The Labour Party announced today it is considering reviewing its rules to send a clear message of zero-tolerance on anti-Semitism. For balance, why not match this with zero-tolerance of those who use the party as a platform for promoting the criminal Israeli regime and its continuing territorial ambitions? Go on, Labour, prove Atzmon wrong – prove the party is not Zionist occupied territory.

Posted in ZIO-NAZI, UKComments Off on UK Labour Party in grip of Zionist inquisition 


Shoah’s pages

www.shoah.org.uk

KEEP SHOAH UP AND RUNNING

December 2019
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031