Archive | June 1st, 2012

TUT Pod-Broadcast with Palestinian Journalist Sammi Ibrahem

TUT Pod-Broadcast with Palestinian Journalist Sammi Ibrahem

by crescentandcross

THIS, ladies and gentlemen, is The Ugly Truth Broadcast

A cell phone and earpiece that I got free with my plan,

A used laptop computer I got at the pawn shop,

Some wires I got at Radio Shack


THIS is what is driving organized Jewish interests batty–a few rudimentary tools and the will to use them.

Now, on to more important things–

Today Sammi Ibrahem appears LIVE at 4 pm eastern time.

Those wishing to listen live can do so by clicking here–

Those wishing to participate in the discussion can do so by phone by dialing 530.881.1300 and then punching in the access code 179164#

Or by skype by adding freeconferencing.5308811300 as a contact, calling it and then punching in 179164# when prompted.

We also have a chat room as well which can be accessed here–



Download Here

Posted in InterviewComments Off on TUT Pod-Broadcast with Palestinian Journalist Sammi Ibrahem

Zionist Al Jazeera: Al-Houla Massacre Propaganda

11am news bulletin on al-Jazeera English on Thursday, the 31st of May 2012 – The Syria part. Talking about al-Houla massacre..

Posted in SyriaComments Off on Zionist Al Jazeera: Al-Houla Massacre Propaganda

Someone out there in the organized Jewish community doesn’t like TUT


There is an old saying–‘You can judge a man by his friends as well as by his enemies’.

Well, seems a certain someone out there doesn’t like what we are doing here at TUT, and moreover, is miffed at the new radio network we are putting together here.

In a post appearing on ‘Jhate’ (I still can’t figure out, does that mean people who hate Jews or people the Jews hate?) our growing endeavor here at TUT is catagorized as ‘Mark Glenn’s new anti-Semitic broadcasting network’. The website is owned/operated by one Rabbi Ariel Tuchman, described as Director of the Research Department of the ADL.

The website is typical Jewish drivel and full of typical Jewish nonsense, about how they are the apple of God’s eye, innocent, pure-as-the-wind-driven-snow and how anything/anyone who moves against them is doing so for simple reasons of ‘hate’, and never, let me repeat–NEVER–as the result of Jewish obnoxious/criminal behavior.

Now, buried within the piece is the coded ‘GO GET ‘EM’ order, meaning that good, loyal Jews the world over (he only has about 62 subscribers) are supposed to do all they can to shut down what we are doing by contacting wordpress, which hosts TUT blog, as well as the other outfits who provide us with the chat room, the live streaming and the conference calling–

‘If Glenn is able to sustain this new operation, he will be entering an already crowded field of anti-Semitic broadcasting online.’

Now, as the readers of this site and the listeners to its accompanying program know, I LOVE a good fight, and particularly with this crowd, since every time they open their mouths and spew out the nonsense that is the natural by-product of their own congenital mental illness, they prove me right and make my job as a prosecutor easy.

Therefore, I sent an email to the owner/operator of this blog, challenging him to a one-on-one, live, which reads as follows–

Dear Mr. So and so,

I have seen several posts on your website regarding me and my work. Now, since you Jews pride yourself on your debate/language skills, I would absolutely LOVE to have you on my program to discuss the things which you seem perfectly happy to cover in a platform such as this, where the only other people involved are your own personal sychophants and cheerleaders.

What have you got to lose? You are God’s chosen people, aren’t you? Didn’t he send plagues and part the Red Sea for you? It is a slam-dunk in your favor.

I eagerly await your (non) response.


We shall see if ‘the good Rabbi’ indeed has the faith to move mountains and elects to come on the program. My personal hunch is that he will not, but instead will do what organized Jewish interests do whenever someone chooses to exercise his/her right to free speech, which is to organize around that individual and screech their lungs out in shutting him up.

updates as they occur…

UPDATE–I have heard back from ‘the good rabbi’ Ariel Tuchman concerning his appearance on the program to discuss his various theories concerning ‘anti-Semitism’ and ‘hatred of Jews’ and his response was a mere 2-words in length–

‘No thanks’

To which my response was as follows–


Why am I NOT surprised???

Such cowards, you people really are. The only fights you will engage in are against the defenseless, a ‘fixed’ fight as it were.

You are (and always have been) your own worst enemies, you know that, don’t you?

again, updates as they occur…

Posted in CampaignsComments Off on Someone out there in the organized Jewish community doesn’t like TUT

Mark Dankof writes Rabbi Tuchman of the ADL regarding his hit on Mark Glenn and Press TV

TO: You + 4 More
CC: 67 recipients

Show Details

Rabbi Aryeh Tuchman
Director, Library and Research Center
Assistant Director, Civil Rights Division
Headquarters: The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith/New York
Phone: 212-885-7859
Fax:  212-885-5882

Re:  Mark Glenn’s New Anti-Semitic Broadcast Network

Dear Rabbi Tuchman:

I am saddened that you have not responded to my formal and cordial public invitation to appear on The Ugly Truth, and on Press TV, to be given an honest opportunity to have your concerns discussed and addressed in these forums.

I simply repeat that open invitation here.  There is no need to continue these anonymous posts on your JHate blog when those of us accused by you of various sins are open and willing to give you the forum and time you need to present your end of this ongoing debate.  The First Amendment still lives in America, at least until the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai Brith and its affiliated stooges from Coast to Coast manage its complete shredding and destruction.

I cannot conclude anything from your clandestine, anonymous methods, other than the clear fact that in your heart you know that honest airing of concerns about Israel’s policies in the Middle East, their sordid campaign in the United States for the launching of an unjustified preemptive military strike on Iran, and the role of the Jewish Lobby in this country in facilitating a controlled news media and a bought-and-paid for electoral process, is exposing your own moral bankruptcy and that of your affiliates and assets worldwide.

That exposure is largely due to Alternative Media.  And this exposure means the eventual end of your shell game and that of the New World Order and the Zionist ideology that is its foundation.
Again, I repeat my original invitation to Come Out of the Closet and Join Us.

It is my hope that you leave this second open invitation on your blog.  In the event it is removed, alternative means of documentation and distribution have already been arranged.


Mark Dankof 

Posted in USAComments Off on Mark Dankof writes Rabbi Tuchman of the ADL regarding his hit on Mark Glenn and Press TV

Chutzpah–IsraHell official says Turkey ‘killing’ relations with over Gaza flotilla charges


Though IsraHell has refrained from issuing an official response to indictments, sources within the foreign ministry say move reflects tailspin in relations between Ankara and Tel Aviv.   

ed note–Jewish thinking and projection at its finest. Israel violently assaults a ship bringing humanitarian aid to Gaza, kills close to a dozen people, Turkey brings murder charges against those responsible, and then Israel’s response is that Turkey is being the unreasonable player in all of this.

The worst part is that–apart from a FEW sane voices within the Jewish community–for the most part Jewish interests worldwide will agree with the statement that it is all Turkey’s fault and that the Jewish people and their ‘state’ are the innocent, blameless victims in all of it.


Israel did not respond officially to the submission of a Turkish indictment against four former top IDF officers, yet a foreign ministry official stated anonymously on Monday that the indictment reflects a tailspin in relations between Ankara and Jerusalem. “Erdogan is systematically killing relations between the two states,” the official said.

The court in Istanbul voted unanimously to approve an indictment against Israel’s former military chief Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, along with the former heads of its navy, air force intelligence, and military intelligence, Eliezer Marom, Amos Yadlin, and Avishai Levi, the Anadolu Agency said. They face nine consecutive life terms in prison for “inciting to kill monstrously, and by torturing,” according to Turkey’s state-run news agency.

Former Chief of Staff Ashkenazi released a response saying that “Turkey is an important state, and it shares with Israel a common interest in stability in the Middle East, and I am sure that in the end common sense will prevail.” Ashkenazi added that “from the start of this affair I chose to appear in every forum, and defend IDF soldiers and the IDF itself; the soldiers and the army carried out its mission in the field, for the benefit of the state.”

Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said he thinks that heavy international pressure will be exerted on Turkey, calling on it to scuttle this indictment. “We view this as a grave development,” he said. “Things have lost all proportion.”

It is unlikely Israeli military members will be brought before Turkey’s judicial system, since Israel does not regard them as criminals. If they are convicted in absentia at the end of the trial process, which could take months if not years, the Turkish court could issue an order for their arrest, but such a move would be symbolic and not binding.

According to Turkish news agencies, nine life sentences were demanded – one for each of the casualties aboard the Mavi Marmara – as part of the indictment, which calls for a combined 18,000 years of imprisonment for the four former officers, punishment for crimes committed during the raid on the Gaza-bound flotilla. The indictment includes 490 victims and complainants, among them 189 were injured during the raid.

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Chutzpah–IsraHell official says Turkey ‘killing’ relations with over Gaza flotilla charges

The Washington Post Gets Tough With Iran


by Philip Giraldi

Many Washington pundits understand that the conclusion of a tale very much depends on where one starts. The starting point is how the argument is framed, and if the reader accepts the initial premises, then the rest of the case being made falls into place. Many of the all-too-familiar voices in the foreign policy community are appalled by the prospect that talks with Iran might actually succeed and prevent a possible major war in the Middle East. Since such a war would certainly expand regionally and might well go nuclear, one would expect that its avoidance would be welcomed by all, but that is not necessarily so, particularly if one makes a good living promoting the view that Iran is an existential threat that must be dealt with sooner or later.

Last Wednesday’s Washington Post included an op-ed by two regularly featured advocates of the get-tough-with-Iran school of thought. They are Reuel Marc Gerecht and Mark Dubowitz, both of whom are on the payroll of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). For those who are unfamiliar with FDD, it is a neocon-dominated organization that nevertheless claims to be nonpartisan. It focuses on foreign policy and security issues by “fighting terrorism and promoting freedom,” as it informs us on its website masthead. It works to “defend free nations against their enemies,” which frequently means in practice anyone whom Israel considers to be hostile. FDD’s Leadership Council features former CIA Director James Woolsey, Sen. Joe Lieberman, and Bill Kristol of The Weekly Standard.

Gerecht and Dubowitz’s piece, titled “In Iran Talks, One Side Looks Ready to Bend” in the print edition, poses a number of questions in the first paragraph, including “Who is sufficiently terrified of an atom bomb in Iranian hands to credibly threaten military action?” which is followed by reference to “the menace of a nuclear-armed state that supports terrorism.” The argument is then expanded in paragraph two with Iran’s leadership reportedly spending “billions to develop what appears to be every component of a nuclear-armed missile” followed by paragraph four’s “given how advanced Iran’s nuclear program is” and the assertion that Iran is developing “increasingly proficient centrifuges [that] will allow for much smaller, hard to detect facilities.” And if the reader wonders why Iran is doing this, the answer is also provided in paragraph five: “Tehran’s entire military strategy for a quarter century has been to develop atomic weapons to compensate for an irreversible lack of conventional power.”

There is more in the piece about enrichment levels and how Israel will be forced to attack if nothing is done, all very speculative and dependent on policy decisions that have yet to be made, but the objective is clearly to provide reasons for stepping back from direct negotiations leading to any compromise in order to facilitate truly draconian sanctions (or military action) that will force the Iranian economy to virtually shut down. But the real argument is contained in the first paragraph, which tells the reader that Iran is building a nuclear weapon and supporting terrorists. That Iran must be developing secret capabilities that will morph into weapons plants would appear to have a certain inevitably for the authors, and it is all happening because Iran has made it clear that it wants to go nuclear.

One can argue about whether Iran actually supports terrorism or not; the groups that The Washington Post is no doubt referring to would prefer to think of themselves as resistance movements against Israel, while Iran has itself been on the receiving end of terrorist attacks from Israel and the United States. None of Iran’s regional allies that Washington and Tel Aviv describe as terrorists plausibly threaten the United States. But even conceding that point, there is much else that is questionable in the op-ed.

Gerecht and Dubowitz are suggesting that they know far more than the U.S. government does about Iran’s capabilities and intentions. According to the intelligence community, Iran abandoned plans for a nuclear weapon in 2003 and does not currently have a program to develop one. Even Israeli intelligence agrees that is so. Nor has the U.S. government confirmed the improved performance and apparently concealability of the new centrifuges referred to by Gerecht and Dubowitz.To  the contrary, Tehran is reportedly having problems with its existing centrifuges due to sabotage by Israeli and Western intelligence agencies, including the Stuxnet virus, which affects operating systems for the nuclear energy program. The creation of the hard-to-detect-and-destroy weapons facilities is therefore based on speculation regarding what might happen sometime down the road if all the pieces fall into place and Iran makes the policy decision to proceed in a weapons direction. Likewise with the claim that Iran has a 25-year plan to develop a nuke, an assertion that no reputable intelligence agency has ever made. Israel’s government has been sounding the alarm for many years that Iran is six months away from having a weapon, but it hasn’t happened yet. If this were truly an Iranian government top priority, why the delay?

And even Gerecht and Dubowitz must know that a “nuclear-armed missile” is a far more technologically demanding prospect than a crude nuclear bomb. Where’s the evidence for that apart from some allegations and reported schematics on a laptop computer that surfaced a while back and turned out to be a Mossad fabrication?

Post editorial page editor Fred Hiatt must have breathed a sigh of relief when talks with Iran appeared to break down because of non-negotiable demands by Israel after the Gerecht and Dubowitz piece, but he returned to the theme in a Saturday lead editorial titled “Iran’s Intransigence” with the subheading “The West should not bargain away sanctions for faux concessions.” It repeated the arguments made in the op-ed and included such gems as “extended negotiations will only benefit Iran.” The perfidious mullahs will receive no break from the Post, it appears.

I don’t know if The Washington Post employs fact checkers on its op-eds or editorials, but it would probably be a waste of time to ask. Featuring op-eds by folks who have long advocated harsh measures up to and including preemptive war against Iran and pretending that it is some kind of reliable analysis based on solid evidence when it is anything but and then following up with an editorial making the same points is a typical pattern for Fred Hiatt and his neocon editorial cronies. I would like to see Hiatt come up with a solid, fact-based case explaining why a war with Iran would produce a good result for the United States, because that is really the only argument justifying American involvement in such an enterprise. And let’s leave “Israel’s security concerns” out of it. When last I checked, it was not part of the United States, and it can take care of itself.

Posted in IranComments Off on The Washington Post Gets Tough With Iran

Iran nuclear irony lost on the West


By Jamal Kanj
Jamal Kanj argues that, in dealing with the issue of Iran’s nuclear programme, the five-plus-one countries – the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany – “should be guided by reason, not by Israel’s irrational paranoia that foresees other nations’ ‘potential’ development and knowledge as a ‘security’ threat”.

It is ironic that Western nations seeking to halt Iran’s nuclear ambitions are the same countries that sold nuclear technology to it in the first place. Iran worked with the US and Western nations since the 1950s to develop its knowledge in nuclear energy.

In 1975, German conglomerates Kraftwerk Union and Siemens started the construction on the now infamous Bushehr nuclear plant. After completing more than 50 per cent of work and following the Iranian revolution, the Germans abandoned the project in an apparent dispute over payments with the new government.

In the mid-1990s, employing the same German-pressurized water reactor technology, Iran contracted Russia to complete the work. The nuclear facility eventually became operational almost 30 years later to a fanfare of international condemnation and Israeli protestation.

Israel – the Middle East’s only military nuclear state

Western counties, especially nuclear powers, have little to fear from Iran – even if it ever becomes a nuclear power. Even Israel, which has been the most bellicose nation, cannot be strategically threatened by a nuclear Iran.

History has shown that military nuclear power has served more in a deterrent than an offensive role. The only time a nuclear bomb was used, it was against a non-nuclear power. Accordingly, in the absence of a balance of power, only non-nuclear regional entities could have genuine credible concerns from their nuclear neighbours, be it Iran or Israel.

However, Israel is upset at the prospect of another nation developing a deterrent to its nuclear hegemony. Hence, the five-plus-one major powers seeking to reign in Iran’s nuclear programme – the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany – are helping to uphold Israel’s absolute monopoly on nuclear technology in the region.

Meanwhile, Israeli officials are accusing Iran of using talks “to gain time”. This is interesting since “buying time”, or negotiation for the sake of negotiation, is the same strategy Israel has exploited for 20 years in marathon talks with the Palestinians, while building more illegal settlements over the land up for negotiation.

It is rather discrediting for the US when, following the latest negotiations, instead of heading back to Washington the US delegation flew directly to Tel Aviv to report to Israeli leaders on their meetings in Baghdad.

The US negotiating team, headed by Under-Secretary for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman and accompanied by National Security Council officials working on Iran’s nuclear programme, met the Israeli defence minister and other senior officials for three hours to brief them on their talks with Iran.

The Israeli defence minister threatened last week to attack Iran, even if Tehran agreed to open up its nuclear facilities to greater UN inspection. Obviously, Israel is not only interested in curtailing Iran’s nuclear ambitions, but also its access to knowledge that might allow it to develop a nuclear programme in future.

The five-plus-one should be guided by reason, not by Israel’s irrational paranoia that foresees other nations’ “potential” development and knowledge as a “security” threat. If the West continues to ignore Israel’s proven possession of nuclear weapons, public pressure will eventually force new democracies in the region to develop the same deterrence capabilities.

Therefore, rather than focusing on Iran, the five-plus-one should direct their efforts towards promoting a Middle East free of all weapons of mass destruction, imaginary or real.

Posted in IranComments Off on Iran nuclear irony lost on the West

“Non-Jews are Murderers and Evil Thieves,” Zio-Nazi Orthodox Jewry Leader Says


Zio-Nazi Rabbi Aharon Yehuda Leib Shteinman

The hateful spite of Jewish Supremacism has once again had its veil pulled away in public with the announcement by the leader of Lithuania’s branch of ultra Zio-Nazi orthodox Jewry that all non-Jews are “brainless thieves,” “murderers” and “evil-doers.”

Zio-Nazi Rabbi Aharon Yehuda Leib Shteinman, speaking in the Israeli city of Beit Shemesh to a gathering of religious Jews preparing for the Shavuot holiday, said that “There are eight billion people in the world. And what are they? Murderers, thieves, brainless people… But who is the essence of this world? Has God created the world for these murderers? For these evil-doers?”

His speech, published in full in the haredi, or most conservative ultra-orthodox, newspaper Yated Ne’eman, went on to say that “Non-Jews have no connection to torah. The nations have nothing, no confidence (=faith) and no good principles.

“Those who don’t study torah, are not fulfilling the mitzvoth. If he doesn’t study torah it leads to devastation, his devastation, and the world’s devastation…

“If not torah they will be illiterates and no joy will come of them. Even if he has money, is that the goal (in life)? Can you take money to the grave with you? There is no such thing. What do you have in the grave (afterlife)? Torah.”

There are many who say that the ultra-religious Jews are not part of the world-wide Jewish Supremacist threat to other nations.

The comments by Shteinman show the falseness of this belief. In reality, the ultra-orthodox provide the hard inner core of Jewish Supremacy, to which the group as a whole adheres, differing only in their honesty to the outside world.

The attitude that all non-Jews are “brainless,” “thieves,” murderers” and “evil-doers” who have not been chosen by God, forms a central core belief which underpins Jewish Supremacy and the general hatred of Gentiles for which they are known.

What would the reaction be if anyone else in the world, European, Arabic, African or Chinese, dared to make such a violently racist pronouncement.

What would the Zionist-controlled media say if an American religious leader announced that all Jews were “murderers,” “brainless evil-doers” and “thieves?”

The media outcry would be immediate, vehement and hysterical. Yet, because it is a Jewish Supremacist making these comments about non-Jews, the report of Shteinman’s comments is limited to a few articles in some obscure Jewish media, where the masters of lies are confident that the Goyim will not notice.

Once again, the veil hiding Jewish Supremacy has been torn down, by the Jewish extremists themselves.

All decent people of the world, no matter their race or origin, should take note of this insight in the hate-filled and utterly evil view which Jewish Supremacists have of them.

Truly the world will not know peace until this nightmare is removed from all positions of power in the world today.

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on “Non-Jews are Murderers and Evil Thieves,” Zio-Nazi Orthodox Jewry Leader Says

Shoah’s pages