Archive | July 27th, 2015

UK’s VIP pedophile network exposed on Australian TV

Image result for Peter Mandelson PHOTO
Peter Mandelson
A special report from 60 Minutes Australia details the underground human and sex trafficking trade woven deep into the fabric of British society.From normal citizens to TV personalities and spies, to notable British politicians and members of royalty, the report reveals many were procured underage children via a secret network to use as sex slaves.More from Nine Network:

It’s shaping up to be the biggest political scandal in Britain’s history. There is new evidence that some of the country’s most respected men were in fact depraved paedophiles. Leaders that were preying on children as young as eight and nine. Many of the kids were trafficked from state-run homes and other institutions to be abused by MPs, Lords, and spies. They were protected from on high by a secret code, and have never been held to account for their horrific crimes. 60 Minutes investigates the scandal and the cover up, speaks to the victims and the witnesses, and confronts a member of the notorious paedophile information exchange. Reporter Ross Coulthart also reveals how children were killed in order to protect this network of predators – and how the driver to the Australian High Commissioner could hold the key to blowing this case wide open.


– Australian comedian exposes pedophile politicians live on air
– Royal Family may be investigated in child sex inquiry
– Prince Charles’ best friend abused 22 children at one school
– Accused pedophile Prince Andrew avoids facing trial
– Britain’s VIP pedophile ring exposed
– Another friend of Royal Family faces pedophile charges
– British Royal pedophile protected for ‘national security’ reasons
– Prince Philip’s ex-aide up on child sex charges
– 114 documents exposing elite pedophile ring go ‘missing’

– Prince Andrew: latest royal pedophile exposed
– Covered-up: Prince Charles’ links to mass pedophile Jimmy Savile
– VIP pedophile ring operating out of Buckingham Palace and Balmoral Castle
– At least 40 UK politicians involved in Westminster ‘pedophile ring’

Posted in UKComments Off on UK’s VIP pedophile network exposed on Australian TV

Crack Scotland Yard detective says top brass sabotaged his bid to expose Blair minister in Establishment paedophile ring

  • Detectives identified 12 suspected abusers operating in children’s homes
  • The 1998 list included a minister in Tony Blair’s government and a celebrity
  • Inspector Clive Driscoll was moved off case and transferred to a new area
  • He was told of ‘orders from on high’ before investigation was shut down

25 July 2015

Former police inspector Clive Driscoll was investigating a minister in Tony Blair's government suspected of being linked to a paedophile ring in 1998 when he was moved off of the case

Former police inspector Clive Driscoll was investigating a minister in Tony Blair’s government suspected of being linked to a paedophile ring in 1998 when he was moved off of the case

One November day in 1998, a group of officials from Lambeth Council found themselves in an upstairs meeting room at Mary Seacole House, a concrete office block in South London.

It was the end of a lengthy business meeting. And they were sitting in stunned silence.

The reason? A few moments earlier, a local police inspector had just delivered several pieces of earth-shattering news. 

First, he revealed that detectives working on Operation Trawler, an investigation into a paedophile ring suspected of operating in the London borough’s children’s homes, were focusing their inquiries on 12 potential abusers.

Second, he was prepared to name these people. Third, it contained the names of several high-profile members of the Establishment.

On condition of confidentiality, the policeman read out a list of the people his team was pursuing.

One was a Lambeth councillor. Another was a household-name celebrity. A third, perhaps most explosively, was a minister in Tony Blair’s government.

‘These are all only suspects at this stage,’ the policeman said, bullishly. ‘But I have reason to believe that further investigation will produce evidence that I can use to pursue court cases.’

In the room in Clapham High Street there was a sharp intake of breath. Labour-run Lambeth was no stranger to ugly headlines. For almost two decades, its name had been a byword for corruption, incompetence, and loony-Left political dysfunction.

Since the Eighties — when, under the Trotskyite leadership of ‘Red’ Ted Knight, it was dubbed Britain’s worst-run local authority — the Town Hall had spawned a series of criminal investigations and public inquiries, involving everything from fraud and blackmail to Mafia-style racketeering.

More recent years had seen Lambeth’s social services department rocked by a string of appalling sex scandals, some of which remained ongoing.

Yet even by those standards, the allegation that its premises were home to an Establishment paedophile ring, which included a member of the government, must have seemed so extraordinary, and so utterly unprecedented, as to be in a class of its own.

That, presumably, will have been the verdict at Mary Seacole House that day, where the gobsmacked council officials included several of Lambeth’s most senior social workers and executives, along with two of the borough’s solicitors.

Of 12 suspected child abusers on Driscoll's list in 1998, one was a minister in Tony Blair's (pictured) government

Of 12 suspected child abusers on Driscoll’s list in 1998, one was a minister in Tony Blair’s (pictured) government

But in the weeks that followed, something very strange occurred. Far from leading to arrests and court cases, the policeman’s comments triggered events that saw him moved out of Lambeth and Operation Trawler brought to a halt.

In the process, those 12 suspected abusers, including the minister, were kept out of the firing line for more than 15 years. Things had started to unravel roughly three weeks after the meeting on November 26, 1998, when the police inspector, Clive Driscoll, was summoned to a meeting by his superintendent.

There, he learned he was being moved off the investigation, and transferred out of Lambeth, with immediate effect, due to what the superintendent opaquely called ‘orders from on high’.

Shortly afterwards, Operation Trawler was unceremoniously shut down, and its remaining staff transferred to other duties, again due to apparent ‘orders on high’.

Records of its existence, including paperwork identifying the 12 suspects, were transferred to police and council archives, where many crucial documents would subsequently disappear. Finally, that December, Driscoll, a highly-regarded police officer with two decades of service, found himself being disciplined for alleged misconduct, for having shared the high-profile men’s names in that original, supposed confidential meeting.

The formal complaint was eventually dropped, but not before he’d been forced to undergo a highly unpleasant disciplinary hearing. By the time he learned he was in the clear, all hope of continuing to pursue the investigation had vanished.

All of which meant that — by accident or design — the allegations he hoped to investigate were kicked into the long grass.

There they remained until early last year when, amid growing public concern about historic child sex offences and their apparent cover-up, Driscoll gave a brief interview about his experience in Lambeth to BBC2’s Newsnight programme.

Recently retired, Driscoll was by then one of the best-known detectives in Britain, thanks to his involvement in a string of celebrated cases.

He was respected, among other things, for leading a meticulous investigation into the racist murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence. Against extraordinary odds, he’d uncovered new forensic evidence (where several predecessors had failed) leading to the successful 2012 prosecution of the teenager’s killers Gary Dobson and David Norris.

Michael John Carroll was allowed to work with children in Lambeth, south London, despite being convicted of a serious sex offence

Michael John Carroll was allowed to work with children in Lambeth, south London, despite being convicted of a serious sex offence

Driscoll had also spearheaded the delicate inquiry into Bachan Athwal, a Sikh woman from West London convicted in a 2007 trial of orchestrating the honour killing of Surjit Athwal, her daughter-in-law.

Given these successes, it was perhaps little surprise that the Metropolitan Police should this time around decide, in direct response to Newsnight, to take his comments very seriously.

The force announced its staff would be formally investigating both Driscoll’s alleged discoveries in Lambeth — and the manner in which he was removed from office — as part of Operation Trinity, a new inquiry focused on sex abuse in the borough in the Eighties and Nineties. That investigation continues.

In the meantime, Driscoll’s recollection of the Lambeth sex ring is set this week to make a sensational return to the news agenda with the imminent publication of his autobiography, In Pursuit Of The Truth.

It tells how Driscoll, an eccentric figure with a reputation (in some quarters) as a maverick, spent 34 years in the Met modelling himself on Sergeant George Dixon, the old-school TV bobby played by Jack Warner on the BBC show Dixon Of Dock Green.

Preferring to walk London’s pavements rather than sit behind a desk, he repeatedly turned down promotions to carry on doing old-fashioned beat work, and at times confounded colleagues with his unconventional approach to modern policing.

It is, for obvious reasons, the two lengthy chapters detailing his work in Lambeth that will be most keenly scrutinised, however.

In them, Driscoll, now 64, describes moving to the borough in July 1998 as a member of SO5, a specialist Scotland Yard unit focused on child protection.

On one of his first days, he attended a meeting at Lambeth Council where officials discussed the recent arrest, by police in Liverpool, of Michael John Carroll.

Carroll, then 49, was the former manager of a home for vulnerable children in Angell Road, Brixton. He’d been given that job by Lambeth Council in the late Seventies, despite a 1966 criminal conviction which made him a Schedule One sex offender, the most serious category, who is known to be a danger to children.

Even after Lambeth learned of that conviction, he was scandalously allowed to work with children in the borough until 1991. Unsurprisingly, perhaps, he abused dozens of them.

After leaving Lambeth, Carroll moved to the North-West, where he’d abused more boys, leading to him, at the time of the meeting, facing around 70 criminal charges. He would admit to 24 indecent assaults, five counts of attempted buggery, five of buggery, and one act of gross indecency, on 12 boys, earning a ten-year jail sentence. One of his victims was aged just eight.

It wasn’t long, however, before Driscoll was told this abuse was part of a wider pattern. Moments after the July meeting, he claims to have been approached by a Lambeth social worker called Libby Blake.

‘Carroll was only the tip of the iceberg,’ she allegedly told him. ‘The children’s homes have been the playground for the rich and powerful for years.’

Driscoll was quickly moved off the operation, which was subsequently shut down by ‘orders from on high’

Driscoll was quickly moved off the operation, which was subsequently shut down by ‘orders from on high’

Driscoll was told about Steven Forrest, an assistant to Carroll who had died of Aids in 1992. He, too, appeared to have abused boys at Angell Road, and council staff were now concerned some of his victims had been infected.

Blake advised Driscoll to seek further details regarding the dark underbelly of the borough from a local councillor called Anna Tapsell, telling him: ‘She’s the only one in Lambeth who’ll tell you the truth.’ He spoke with Ms Tapsell and recalls: ‘What Anna told me was almost too horrific to process.

‘According to her, children from homes in Lambeth had been farmed out to paedophiles and other sexual predators.’ Whistle-blowers had been unable to stop the abuse because, she claimed, ‘they’re up against some very powerful forces’.

Indeed, Driscoll claims that Tapsell was subsequently visited by ‘Special Branch’ officers advising her against talking publicly about the alleged child abuse.

Undeterred, he instructed two junior officers to begin investigating potential abuse at Angell Road and other Lambeth children’s homes as part of Operation Trawler.

They started by interviewing a cross-section of council staff, care-home employees, and police colleagues from Liverpool, who were carrying out their own investigation of Carroll called Operation Care. These inquiries saw Driscoll managing to, as he puts it, ‘strike gold’.

‘I found someone who admitted they’d seen pornography changing hands on council property, which led to someone else saying there was a video doing the rounds featuring “prominent” people engaged in sexual activities with minors.’

He never discovered that film, but arrested a man who possessed a selection of other illegal pornographic movies, several of which appeared to have been made in properties belonging to Lambeth Council.

That man (whose name has been omitted from the book to avoid interfering with an ongoing police investigation) was jailed for four years. ‘There were recognisable faces in his pictures, both victims and perpetrators, and locations that could be traced,’ says Driscoll.

Elsewhere, he writes, an ‘anonymous informant’ passed on the names of three people he ought to take an interest in. ‘These weren’t witnesses or victims,’ he writes. ‘They were suspects. One of them was a Lambeth councillor. Another was a celebrity. And a third was a member of the government.’

By late August 1998, Driscoll was sufficiently confident about his operation’s progress to be prepared to confidentially share an overall list of ‘around a dozen suspects’ with two colleagues from outside the police force: a social services inspector and a senior member of Lambeth council. ‘Everyone in the room was happy,’ he said of their response. ‘I left and my work continued.’

Troubling: The Labour minister was kept out of the firing line for 15 years

Troubling: The Labour minister was kept out of the firing line for 15 years

Then, in early November, came the sensational meeting at Mary Seacole House. Driscoll was later shown official Lambeth council minutes of the meeting.

He was ‘surprised to note’, he writes, that ‘there was mysteriously no record’ of him having named his 12 suspects.

‘I then spoke to two social workers, who confirmed there had been a further meeting [after the one he attended] to discuss the minutes. One of the original men present had gone through saying “take that out … take that out … take that out”.’ The resulting document therefore told, he claims, a ‘very different’ tale ‘to the version I lived through’.

Driscoll was then, he says, dismissed from Lambeth a few weeks later by Superintendent Brian Tomkins, who allegedly told him: ‘I’m really sorry, Clive, but the orders come from on high.’

Operation Trawler was closed down shortly afterwards, and its investigations were taken up by a different Met Police inquiry, called Operation Middleton. ‘They managed a handful of arrests over a decade,’ says Driscoll. ‘None of the major players from my list featured.’

As to the subsequent disciplinary complaint against him, he adds: ‘The case against me was eventually dropped — not that I was told at the time — moments after I was officially moved from Lambeth.

‘I couldn’t help feeling that it had been designed to halt my investigation long enough until other people were successfully put in place.’ 

Many readers will doubtless agree. Yet some others may, for entirely understandable reasons, feel inclined to question this and some of the other more sensational claims on these pages.

After all, most of the more controversial aspects of Mr Driscoll’s memoir appear to be unsupported by surviving documentary evidence.

He does not retain the correspondence he was sent regarding the disciplinary complaint. Neither has he produced any paperwork recording the interviews, meetings and conversations he cites in great detail in the book.

Most importantly, perhaps, he does not elaborate on what evidence he had actually compiled against either the Blair minister or other members of the alleged Establishment paedophile ring. 

Driscoll doesn’t say whether he had been able to identify specific victims and first-hand witnesses of alleged abuse, or whether his list of high-profile ‘suspects’ was merely a collection of names of people about whom he’d heard convincing rumours.

A dossier of correspondence released this week under the Freedom of Information Act does reveal that ministers in Tony Blair’s government received briefing papers in 1998 about Michael John Carroll. But none of those documents contain any mention of a minister being under suspicion.

Not all of the people and organisations mentioned in Driscoll’s autobiography appear to share his exact recollection of specific events, either.

Libby Blake tells me that while she does recall meeting Driscoll in the summer of 1998, and telling him to contact Anna Tapsell, she categorically did not tell him that local children’s homes had been ‘the playground for the rich and powerful for years’.

Blake also denies describing Tapsell, in the same conversation, as ‘the only one in Lambeth who’ll tell you the truth’.

Theresa May: Westminster paedophile ring just tip of iceberg

Both those quotations by Driscoll are inaccurate, Blake insists, for two reasons: first they express opinions she did not have, and second they use expressions that she does not use, and has never used, in normal conversation.

Tapsell, for her part, denies ever having been visited by Special Branch officers, as Driscoll’s book states. However, she does recall receiving a similar visit from a superintendent working on Operation Middleton. She also remembers hearing that Driscoll was investigating a dozen high-profile suspects, including a minister.

With this in mind, she describes the rest of the text as ‘very authentic’.

Lambeth Council has yet to comment on the specifics of Driscoll’s memoir, but says it is ‘firmly committed’ to finding the truth about historic abuse cases that occurred on its patch.

The Metropolitan Police, meanwhile, will say only that ‘there remains an ongoing investigation by the Directorate of Professional Standards into allegations made by Clive Driscoll’. They do not dispute that he was moved from Lambeth in late November 1998.

One contemporary source who backs up important aspects of Driscoll’s version of events is Nigel Goldie, a former Lambeth social services boss.

He claimed this week to have had a ‘discussion’ with a government inspector about Driscoll in which they pondered ‘how we were going to handle this because of the huge political implications of a serving minister being investigated on suspicion of child sex offences’.

Weighing all this evidence, we can perhaps be entirely sure of just a few elements of this extraordinary tale.

First that at a Lambeth Council meeting in November 1998, Clive Driscoll did indeed announce that he was investigating 12 named suspected paedophiles, including a celebrity, a Lambeth councillor, and a Labour minister, on suspicion of abusing residents of local children’s homes.

Also, that around three weeks later, he was removed from the borough and his investigation was closed down. The rest, for now, is open to debate.

‘The truth is out there — and getting nearer,’ is how Clive Driscoll himself puts things.

‘If and when it does all come out, it could cause the biggest shake-up of our country since Oliver Cromwell.’
Read more: 

Posted in UKComments Off on Crack Scotland Yard detective says top brass sabotaged his bid to expose Blair minister in Establishment paedophile ring

Saudi Zio-Wahhabi ‘ISIS’ throws two men to their deaths from a roof


The footage, reportedly shot in Palmyra, Syria, shows the savage execution of two Syrian men. 

ISIS fighters read their charges to the crowd.

Yet another video of  Saudi Zio-Wahhabi ‘ISIS’  killers throwing men from the roof of a tall building after accusing them of being Members of the regime has emerged online.

The men are blindfolded and then thrown off the roof

They were thrown off a roof and then stoned to death by the thugs of the Saudi Zio-Wahhabi caliphate.

These "events" always draw a crowd

3,027 civilians, rebels, members of the regime forces and allied militiamen and ISIS members were executed by IS since the declaration of its alleged Saudi Zio-Wahhabi “caliphate”.

The terror group executed 1,787 civilians, including 74 children and 86 women, by shooting, beheading, stoning, throwing from high places and burning.

Notice all the stones around the men, The crowd stones them on the ground just in case the fall didn't kill them









Posted in Saudi Arabia, SyriaComments Off on Saudi Zio-Wahhabi ‘ISIS’ throws two men to their deaths from a roof

EU Visa-Slams Ukrainians After February 2014 Ukrainian Coup

Global Research

Although the coup in Ukraine in February 2014 was allegedly done in order to get Ukraine into the European Union (because the overthrown President Viktor Yanukovych had just before declined the EU’s offer for Ukraine to join the EU), European countries are now denying Ukrainians visas even more than they had been doing before the coup and its follow-on Association Agreement with the EU.

Ukraine’s independent European Integration website headlined on July 21st, “The Percentage of Refusals Increased,” and reported that, “Of the 22 countries in the Schengen area [the countries where visas are not required], 16 increased the percentage of refusals of entrance to Ukrainians as compared to the year 2013,” which was the final year prior to the coup.

Furthermore: “Switzerland and Finland denied visas to Ukrainians at a rate three times higher than in 2013, and Spain, Portugal, Greece and Sweden denied visas almost twice as much as in 2013.”

Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin “admitted: Some consulates deliberately do not give visas to Ukrainians, even when they are eligible.”

The same website had reported on June 26th that they were informed, “Most of the people who are affected by this live outside Kiev and the other major cities. … I fear it will lead to increased numbers of forged papers from those areas.”

On July 15th, the website quoted Klimkin at a meeting of Ukraine’s parliamentary committee on European integration, saying, “Some countries pretend that everything remains as it was before, but against the background of internal pressure [to block more Ukrainians from visiting] they change the visa practice.” That report quoted Klimkin saying he is “now putting pressure on these consulates and capitals, demanding they return to the previous practice.”

The report on July 21st discussed what might be causing these increased refusals: “Why are Ukrainians denied visas? On this, we asked our expert Visa-free diary editor, … Sergei Sidenko:

‘The problem of increasing the number of refusals last year was a response to the events in the East [especially the region that had voted 90%+ for Yanukovych and rejected the coup-imposed government, and where the new Ukrainian government responded by bombing that region]. Some countries are suspicious of Ukrainians generally, but especially of people who live near the conflict-zone, suspicious that they’ll take advantage of tourist visas and ask for asylum.’”

The EU hadn’t been very eager for Ukraine to join it, but Ukraine’s joining the EU had long been a goal of American Presidents in order to isolate and weaken Russia, and especially President Obama planned for this, and made the changes in his Administration right after the 2012 U.S. Presidential election, in order to carry it out, such as by promoting Victoria Nuland to run European affairs, and transferring Geoffrey Pyatt to the Kiev Embassy to become the man on the ground coordinating it. The fractious EU has gone along with Obama’s plan, and (except for Netherlands), wasn’t involved with planning and perpetrating the coup. This is the reason why there still is considerable ambivalence within Europe as to whether or not Ukraine should ever be admitted into the EU: the U.S. is more eager for that to happen than the EU itself is. The EU’s leaders were even shocked to find out that Yanukovych had been overthrown by a coup. Only after the fact did it become “the most blatant coup in history, because of the many leaks (such as the ones linked to here at “shocked to find out” and “coordinating it”). It was entirely a U.S.-run operation.

Posted in Europe, UkraineComments Off on EU Visa-Slams Ukrainians After February 2014 Ukrainian Coup


Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem, Sr

Patriots, not “terrorists”.

Indeed, a Google Search for the term “Hezbollah Terrorist” yields an astounding 12,400,000 results. Those Hezbollah thugs must be some really “bad guys”, right? A closer look indicates otherwise.

Hezbollah (“The Party of God”) was formed in 1982 in response to expansionist Israel’s invasion of southern Lebanon and brutal bombardment of the Muslim areas of the northern-central capital city of Beirut. The oh-so-predictable Zionist pretext for the invasion and air raids was “to fight terrorism”. The real reason dates back to the original founding of “Israel”. For geographic, industrial, and fresh water reasons, the Zionists have always wanted the Litani River to delineate the northern border of Israel.

The Israelis want southern Lebanon and the Litani River. The brave militias of Hezbollah won’t allow that to happen.

 The entire basin of the Litani River is located within the borders of Lebanon. The Litani rises in the north and flows south and southwestwards. The river enters a gorge, flows about 30 kilometers and turns right (to the west), finally emptying into the Mediterranean Sea.

It is no secret that Israel is a water-poor state and that the problem is getting worse.

The nearest part of the Litani to Israel is just four kilometers from Israel’s border, which makes it very tempting for dry Israel to covet. Litani has high quality water with very low salinity. Harnessing of Litani power (by damming) is also essential to Lebanon’s industrial and agricultural development. The river passes through tunnels and stocks of hydro-plants to the coast, where it is used for irrigation for areas south of Beirut.

As far back as 1905, early Zionist settlers openly called for the Litani to be diverted southward because it seemed“the waters of the Jordan basin would be insufficient for the future needs of Palestine” (Israel). The Litani, because of its water, was suggested to become part of the “national Jewish entity” in 1919. This radical proposal by Zionist founding father Chaim Weizmann and friends was rejected by the League of Nations. The Litani remained part of post-Ottoman Lebanon instead.

 There were also pre-statehood Jewish claims for the Litani during the 1940’s. David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, suggested the inclusion of the Litani in the coming Jewish state. The Zionists proposed that seven-eighths of the Litani be “leased to Israel.” Where the Litani makes a 90 degree angle, turning deeper into Lebanon and only 2.5 miles from the Lebanese/Israeli border, the river flows within easy tunneling distance from Israel – and very close to regions which Israel controls. 

Zionist legends Ben Gurion and Weizmann openly advocated for control of the Litani River basin. Bibi Satanyahu wants to achieve this long-cherished goal.


 In 1945, a comprehensive water plan for the region included changing the course of the Litani toward the Jordan and using its water for irrigation along the Jordan Valley and in central Palestine. Naturally, this was never implemented because the Arabs did not want to help the coming terror state of Israel. Ben Gurion actually said the Litani should be Israel’s northern border.

Water, in general, was also a source of conflict in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. After that war, Moshe Dayan, defense minister, said that Israel achieved “provisionally satisfying frontiers, with the exception of those with Lebanon.“Israel hoped that it would have use of the Litani by the mid 1980s, when it projected that it would have fully used up the waters captured in the 1967 war. That was when Israel destroyed Beirut, but the Zionists still didn’t get the Litani. UN peacekeepers occupied southern Lebanon instead. America pulled out when a Mossad false-flag blew up a marine barracks in October, 1983, killing 241 marines. Another attack killed 57 French troops.

1- June, 1982: Israel terror-bombed Beirut.

2- October, 1983: 241 U.S. Marines were blown up in an attempt to frame Iran and the new Hezbollah group. 

In 2005, the Mossad / CIA complex triggered the ‘Cedar Revolution’ in Lebanon by killing a prominent Lebanese politician and fingering Syria. The goal of this “color revolution” was to muscle Syrian and Iranian influence out of Lebanon, thus leaving Hezbollah isolated. The phony revolution failed.
In 2006, Israel used the pretext  of “kidnapped Israeli soldiers” to invade southern Lebanon. Pardon the mild vulgarity, but the invading Israeli Defense Forces got their sorry asses kicked so hard they ran back into Israel crying, literally!  
After the 2005 Cedar Revolution fizzled, the 2006 invasion was an unmitigated rout! Soft and weak Israeli soldiers then openly cried for their fallen fellow invaders.
Israel’s goal of seizing everything from the Litani southward is what one might call an “open conspiracy”. Though the Litani River controversy is never discussed in the popular TV media, it is indeed sometimes written about in scholarly journals, research papers, and even in some “mainstream” press articles  (hereherehere).  Continuing to stand in the way of Israel’s water grab are the heroic Iranian-Syrian backed freedom fighters of Hezbollah; who have proven time and again that they are more than a match for the lily-liver child-killing bullies of expansionist Israel. As long as those two sponsoring states, especially Iran, remain viable; Hezbollah isn’t going away anytime soon. And that, my friendsis the real reason why Satanyahu and his U.S. neo-con cheerleaders are so obsessed with dragging America to war against Iran; a nation that poses no threat to Israel and doesn’t even share a border with it!
1- Disciplined and well-armed, Hezbollah Green Berets ain’t no joke!
2- Iran is not even close to Israel (about 700 miles away). The real “threat” to Israel is Iran’s financial and military support of the Lebanese Hezbollah.
Israel’s need for water and its history of dirty tricks makes it conceivable, no, probable, that it may already be using the Litani. The Jewish State has been accused of using tunnels to divert waters from the Litani for its own use; but because the area in question is occupied by Israeli troops, these claims cannot be proven. However, the fact that Israel will not allow journalists in the area is very suspicious, as is everything else the Zionists do. 
Satanyahu’s hatred for Iran has nothing to do with its imaginary nuclear weapons program. The real game is to trick America into destroying Hezbollah’s sponsors and grab some more territory, and water,in southern Lebanon (and beyond!).

Posted in LebanonComments Off on HOORAY FOR HEZBOLLAH!

British troops head to Saudi Arabia to train Zio-Wahhabi Rat’s


The mission will mean Britain is training Zio-Wahhabi Rat’s  fighters in four countries in the region.

An FSA fighter throws a home-made grenade along one of Aleppo's front lines

Zio-Wahhabi Rat FSA fighter throws a home-made grenade along one of Aleppo’s front lines

British troops are being sent to Saudi Arabia to begin training Zio-Wahhabi Rat’s.

Troops will soon be deployed to a desert base in the north of the country to teach rebel volunteers basic infantry skills as part of a US-led training programme.

The mission will mean Britain is training Syrian Zio-Wahhabi Rat’s fighters in four countries, including Turkey, Qatar and Jordan. Overall 85 British troops are carrying out the mission, which Lord Richards, the former chief of the defence staff, has called “woefully insufficient”.

The first team sent to Saudi Arabia will only include around a dozen British military personnel, to work alongside American, Saudi Zio-Wahhabi and French colleagues.

Zionist puppet David Cameron is likely to increase the British force however, with the Zio-Wahhabi camp expected to become the biggest of the training missions around the region.

“Of course if we are going to succeed in defeating Isil either in Iraq or in Syria there will need to be boots on the ground but they should be Iraqi boots, Syrian boots,” he said earlier this week.

The Saudi camp to train members of the Free Syrian Army was agreed by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, interior minister, during a visit to Washington last year.

American-led attempts to train up ”moderates” to hold ground against Isil are months behind track because of the difficulty of finding groups which were not linked to the extremists.

Only 65 rebels had received military training by the start of this month, the US Defence Secretary has admitted. Plans had originally said 3,000 could be trained by the end of the year. In the meantime thousands of foreign fighters have flocked to Isil.

Barack Obama has acknowledged the effort is off track and has ordered his commanders to step up the mission.

Posted in Saudi Arabia, UKComments Off on British troops head to Saudi Arabia to train Zio-Wahhabi Rat’s

UK admits supporting Saudi Zio-Wahhabi


by Alkhalifa repression
Despite initial fear and speculation about foreign support to AlSaud’s offensive aggression on Yemen, UK has now confirmed that it is providing precision-guided bombs to Saudi Arabia to use in airstrikes against targets in Yemen, according to The Times Newspaper (17th July). In a written response to a House of Lords question, the defence minister, Earl Howe, said: “We are providing technical support, precision-guided weapons and exchanging information with the Saudi Arabian armed forces through pre-existing arrangements.” He conceded that “In addition to the personnel who continue to provide support for equipment supplied, we have a small number of liaison personnel in Saudi and coalition air and maritime headquarters. This includes personnel in the Maritime Coalition Co-ordination Centre in the region, supporting the delivery of humanitarian aid into Yemen.”Defence News, an online magazine said that the weapons are understood to be Paveway IV precision -guided bombs originally destined for the RAF.

This is the first official admission by a Western country of involvement in the Saudi aggression on Yemen’s people. Lord Howe’s admission has sent shock waves and added new dimensions to the illegitimate war. Saudi Arabia, like Britain, flies Typhoon and Tornado fast jets, which carry the 500lb munitions. The Saudis have been using the weapons for strike missions against ISIS targets in Syria and against Yemeni people, Defence News reported.

In the week between 13-19th July at least 29 native Bahrainis including six children were arrested by the Alkhalifa regime. More people were arrested in the past two days. Yesterday four people were detained from the Sanabis Town; Hussain Al Sami’e, Taha Hakim AlSheikh, Murtada Adwin and Mohammad Jassim Al Awainati. A female prisoner of conscience, Taiba Darwish, has been remanded in custody for two more weeks for taking part in anti-regime protests. The release of another female political detainee, Zahra Al Sheikh and her 15 months baby only happened after she had served her full sentence of one year in jail for being involved in anti-regime protests.

As the Revolutionary groups declared preparation to mark what they call “Bahraini Hostage Day” on 24th July, many inmates at Jaw Central Prison started hunger strike to protest the deteriorating conditions in the notorious torture centre. The situation there is described as “appallingly overcrowded and unfit for human habitation”.

It’s the time of the year when high school students graduate and prepare to go to the universities of their choice. But for some students in Bahrain, specifically Shiites, activists and government opponents, the path that awaits them is not so bright. One of these ill-fated students is Mustafa Mohammed Ismael who is in jail instead of pursuing his dream of studying medicine. Mustafa graduated top of his class from high school with grades averaging 98.8 percent. On August 15, 2013, Mustafa, who is now 18, was walking out of his grandfather’s house in Nuwaidrat when he was stopped by security patrol. He was charged with illegal gathering and initially sentenced to six months. The court of appeal later reduced the sentence to three months and released him on bail 24 days later. This year the regime has committed what is termed “scholarships massacre”, denying bright students of native origin the chance to pursue their studies while granting pro-regime loyalists grants and sc holarships. This is one of the most outrageous Apartheid policies of Bahrain’s dictator.

The ferocious and systematic attack on freedom of speech has outraged even the supporters of the regime. The arrest of Ibrahim Sharif has deprived the dictator of any praise for the release of Nabeel Rajab. There are strong demands that all charges against him, Mr Sharif, Sheikh Ali Salman and Bahrain 13, be dropped. The United States Ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, criticized the Bahraini “government’s crackdown on three opposition figures,” referring to the arrest of Wa’ad leader “Ebrahim Sharif,” prosecution of the Al-Wefaq figure Majeed Milad and retrial of the leader of the opposition in Bahrain, Sheikh Ali Salman.  Index on Censorship calls on King Hamad to release all the political prisoners currently serving sentences on spurious charges,” Index on Censorship CEO Jodie Ginsberg said. UN experts have also called for releasing all political prisoners and dropping charges relating to freedom of expression levelled against most of them. In London 39 MPs have signed Petition 241 calling on the Government of Bahrain to allow free speech and stop persecution of people for speaking out, protesting or calling for their rights. It also calls on the UK Government to list Bahrain as a “0country of concern”.

Bahrain Freedom Movement
22 July 2015

Posted in Middle East, Bahrain, UKComments Off on UK admits supporting Saudi Zio-Wahhabi

Gaza: Hamas crackdown on Zionist traitors ”jihadists”


Threat comes in response to Hamas crackdown on jihadists over alleged series of bombings targeting Strip’s ruling faction.

gaza rocket

Radical Islamist Salafists in Gaza have threatened to launch projectiles at Israel in retribution for what they call “crimes and conspiracies” conducted by the Strip’s ruling faction, Palestinian news agency Ma’an reported Tuesday.

The reported announcement came in a joint statement by various Salafist jihadists organizations in the coastal Palestinian enclave.

The Salafists were responding to an alleged roundup by Hamas of members of the fundamentalist movement suspected of targeting the latter in a string of recent bombings.

“The Salafists have decided to respond to these crimes and these blows dealt by Hamas by pointing rockets towards the occupation (Israel) and carrying out reprisals,” AFP quoted the statement issued by Palestinian Salafists as saying.

Salafists claiming allegiance to Islamic State have claimed a series of rockets attacks on Israel in defiance of Hamas’ truce with the Zio-Nazi state since a war a year ago.

On Sunday, explosions destroyed six cars belonging to members of the Hamas and Islamic Jihad groups in Gaza City, drawing threats of a response.

The blasts hit a district dominated by supporters of Hamas and disrupted celebrations for the Muslim Eid el Fitr holiday.

The targeted groups issued a joint statement condemning the attackers as “Zionist traitors” – suggesting they thought the perpetrators were fellow Palestinians – and promising that they would be “found and punished”.

No one claimed responsibility, but Hamas, which dominates the coastal enclave, has in recent months faced violent challenges from Palestinians sympathetic to Islamic State or al-Qaida, and who seek stringent religious rule in Gaza and open war with Nazi regime.

The Salafist statement reported Tuesday accused Hamas of staging the blasts as an excuse to justify the crackdown on extremist rivals.


Posted in Palestine Affairs, GazaComments Off on Gaza: Hamas crackdown on Zionist traitors ”jihadists”

Training Nazi cyber ”warriors”


Image result for cyber ATTACK PHOTO

Inside Nazi army computer labs, troops use a model city to practice creating mayhem: Causing a nuclear reactor to overheat, taking over traffic lights and rail, cutting power, hacking missiles, creating chaos in the stock market, and more – all in preparation for the next major conflict.

Yoav Zitun

Far from troops’ training fields, inside air-conditioned and apparently innocuous computer labs in illegaly occupied Tel Aviv’s Ramat Gan neighborhood, Nazi army prepares for a non-traditional type of warfare – the cyber war that is sure to be a major component of future major conflicts.

Graduates of the cyber warfare course in the Computer Services Directorate have built a model city they use to rehearse diverse missions like halting the cooling process in a nuclear reactor, remotely taking over trains and traffic lights to cause accidents, taking control of stock exchange computers, cutting electricity, disabling radar systems at airports, and even taking control of anti-air missile systems in order to fire them at cities they were meant to protect.

Remote control of... (Photo: IDF Spokesman, Yoav Zitun)
Remote control 

One of the goals of the model city is for troops to practice creating sophisticated codes designed to remotely control computer systems.

“We just recently finished training the seventh graduating class of cyber warriors and have adapted our teaching methods better,” said Nazi Major G., the course commander. “The soldiers have more experiences with the fundamentals of attack, in order to understand the other side’s mindset. During Operation Protective Edge, there were attempts to attack Israeli infrastructure, which demanded cooperation between many elements and bodies to stop the attacks. Today we are much more active and no longer for attacks.”

A nuclear reactor (Photo: IDF Spokesman, Yoav Zitun)
A nuclear reactor 

One of the course instructors is K., 19, who reminds his students of mysterious cyber attacks like the Stuxnet worm that infested Iran’s nuclear facilities several years ago.

“In many industries there is a certain component that connects all the systems, even in elevators or in trains, and so Stuxnet attacked the centrifuge generators in Iran. As warriors, we develop scenarios to simulate dealing with such attacks, how to regain control of the system that was attacked and even create an ultimatum for the other side.

Nazi army believes that in the event of a Third Lebanon War, Hezbollah will attempt to launch GPS-guided missiles or suicide drones at strategic targets like Reading Power Station in Tel Aviv to cripple the power supply to tens of thousands of households in the area. Iron Dome and David’s Sling will be there apparently, in order to shoot down the threat while it’s in flight. On the ground in south Lebanon, paratroopers will conduct maneuvers to destroy the launchers, and other launchers will be attacked by Nazi AF planes.

The stock exchange (Photo: IDF Spokesman, Yoav Zitun)
The stock exchange 

But what happens if an attack on a critical, national asset is covert, silent, alarm-free and sudden, without shooting a single rocket?

Soldiers trained by the Computer Services Directorate know full well that the day will come when they will protect more than the military’s computerized systems. The networked Nazi army has become a faster, deadlier military – but also a more vulnerable one.

The chief of staff directs the war at general headquarters via advanced programs and huge screens. The battalion commander uses the small display he can see through binoculars. Military intelligence sees the Nazi AF and the armor fires only after a screen in the tank shows where the soldiers are located.

And the train (Photo: IDF Spokesman, Yoav Zitun)
And the train 

And the enemy, be it Iran or a Palestinian hacker in a Gaza house or a Chicago garage, wants to knock the Nazi army out with the push of a button.

Nazi official policy is that any vital body, private or public, that is necessary for continuity of the state’s functioning, is required to protect itself from cyber attacks, according to Nazi Gestapo ‘Shin Bet’ orders. The electric and water companies, banks, and even mobile networks are some of the businesses that must meet this requirement.

But when the day comes that an organization or state launches a cyber campaign against Nazi army , the cyber ‘warriors’ will not sit by idly.




Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Training Nazi cyber ”warriors”

The War on Conspiracy Realists Continues

Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem, Sr
By Brandon Martinez 

Do you believe that governments occasionally conspire to undermine the public good? Do you believe that governments manipulate people through fear to achieve nefarious ends such as war and intervention abroad? Do you believe that ‘elected’ officials serve rich and powerful special interests rather than the majority population?


If you answered yes to any of the above, and you are a British citizen, then you could be the target of a new ‘counter-extremism’ initiative spearheaded by that country’s perverse Prime Minister David Cameron. As part of his Orwellian ‘counter-extremism’ effort, Cameron has instituted a number of truly despotic measures intent on stifling free speech and extirpating ‘heretical’ viewpoints about false flag terrorism and the undue influence of Zionists on Western foreign policy.

While self-evident to most clear thinking people, the notion that the West is deliberately targeting Muslims and their countries in accordance with an intricately fashioned master plan of divide and conquer will now be a prohibited opinion that could put the British police state on your trail.

“Muslim conspiracy theorists,” Cameron proclaimed in a recent speech outlining his ‘five year strategy’ to combat extremism, who believe that “Jews exercise a ‘malevolent’ power, that [the] Israeli intelligence agency Mossad inspired 9/11 and that the UK allowed 7/7 because it wanted an anti-Muslim backlash” are to be singled out for suppression.[1]

Cameron’s 1984-style designs will give parents the ability to revoke their children’s passports if suspected of holding ‘extremist’ beliefs. Police will be given new surveillance powers as well as the authority to vet what certain ‘extremists’ and ‘conspiracy theorists’ post on social media. Additionally, Ofcom – Britain’s communications regulatory body – will also be empowered to “crack down on television channels broadcasting extremist messages.” ‘Extremist messages’ appears to be a thinly disguised euphemism for anything not consonant with Western and Zionist propaganda.

Cameron’s aggressive moves against free expression were not unforeseen. During a speech at the United Nations last September, the British leader decried “conspiracy theorists” as “non-violent extremists” who should be confronted with the “full force” of the British state.[2]

The theory that Israel and Western intelligence agencies were involved in the fabrication of 9/11 and other false flag attacks was specifically mentioned by Cameron as one of those “dangerous ideas” that needs to be eliminated from public discourse. Inferences about Jewish-Zionist manipulation of Western foreign policy towards the Islamic world should also be combatted, said Cameron in the speech.

Distracting the Public from Western Sponsorship of ISIS

All of this disingenuous bluster rings hollow when one considers the fact that Western governments and their allies have supported, and many would argue created, ISIS to serve their duplicitous agenda in the Middle East.

The CIA, MI6 and Mossad, in conjunction with the oppressive autocrats of Saudi Arabia, have long worked with Wahhabi-Salafist extremist elements in the Middle East and North Africa to counter other more formidable, non-sectarian adversaries in the region such as Libya’s Gaddafi, Syria’s Assad, Lebanon’s Hezbollah and the Islamic Republic of Iran. A re-run of the CIA’s “Operation Cyclone” which empowered Mujahideen forces in Afghanistan against the Soviets in the 1980s is currently unfolding in the Middle East under the auspices of many of the same players.

Award winning reporter Seymour Hersh revealed in a 2007 report titled “The Redirection” that the Bush administration launched a joint covert operation with Israel and Saudi Arabia to augment “Sunni extremist groups” and other fanatics to weaken the influence of Syria, Iran and Hezbollah.[3]

Obama picked up where Bush left off, flooding Syrian and Libyan insurgent groups with untold largesse and arms, using the corrupted Arab Gulf kingdoms as conduits for weapons transfers for the sake of plausible deniability.

Hersh’s sources close to the US government told him that the Saudis assured Washington that they exercised control over the extremist Wahhabi and Salafist groups, and would steer their fanaticism towards the Shiites. “It’s not that we don’t want the Salafis to throw bombs; it’s who they throw them at—Hezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Iran, and at the Syrians, if they continue to work with Hezbollah and Iran,” Prince Bandar bin Sultan, Saudi Arabia’s then-National Security Advisor, purportedly told his American counterparts in the Bush administration. “We’ve created this movement, and we can control it.” [4]

Part of the arrangement, Hersh explained, was a guarantee from the Saudis that Israel’s security interests would be safeguarded, which clarifies why ISIS and its affiliates have not attacked Israel despite the country’s close proximity to the terrorists’ strongholds in Syria and Iraq. “Israel would be assured that its security was paramount and that Washington and Saudi Arabia and other Sunni states shared its concern about Iran,” Hersh noted was the first point in a series of “informal understandings about their new strategic direction” to combat Shiite influence led by Iran. [5]

ISIS themselves have mostly eschewed hostility towards Israel, posting an official statement on social media in July 2014 saying that they’re more interested in fighting “Muslim infidels” than the Zionist state.[6]

Israeli officials have expressed similar sentiments, with Israel’s former envoy to the US, Michael Oren, stating in a September 2013 interview that Tel Aviv “prefers” ISIS and al-Qaeda over the “bad guys backed by Iran,” namely Syria’s Assad and Hezbollah. Oren forthrightly conceded that Israel is committed to defeating through terrorist violence “the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut” with Assad in Syria functioning as the “keystone in that arc.”  “That is a position we had well before the outbreak of hostilities in Syria,” Oren told the Jerusalem Post. “With the outbreak of hostilities we continued to want Assad to go.” [7]

The unholy alliance between Israel and the Salafist jihadists came right out in the open in June 2015 when ISIS released a video threatening to topple Hamas in Gaza [8], promising to bring bloodshed and ruin to the Strip. Salafist elements tied to ISIS have in fact attacked Hamas havens in Gaza on multiple occasions over the past few months, showcasing their utility as pawns of Israel. [9][10][11]

There are also well-documented direct connections between ISIS-linked militants and Israel. A 2014 report compiled by United Nations observers stationed in the area revealed that the Israeli military has provided anti-Assad militants with sanctuary on the Israeli side of the Golan region, ostensibly treating wounded fighters in Israeli field hospitals and even giving them caches of weapons and other supplies. [12]

On top of material support for the terrorists that have besieged Syria, Israel has aided their onslaught through numerous air strikes against Syrian military targets since the turmoil began in earnest in 2012, effectively attempting to tip the tide of the war in the Takfiris’ favour.[13]

In January 2015 Israel conducted an air strike that wiped out a brigade of Hezbollah fighters on the Syrian side of the Golan Heights, once again highlighting the Takfiri-Tel Aviv nexus. [14]

In light of such treachery against Arabs and Muslims trying to liberate themselves from oppression and domination, ISIS’s primary function as an acquiescent tool of US-Israeli imperialism cannot be overstated.

Perfidious Albion

As Prime Minister Cameron feigns outrage and opposition to Islamic extremism, the British government under his watch has been an active and willing partner in the Machiavellian strategy of divide and rule in the Middle East spearheaded by the US and Israel.

The 2015 trial of Swedish national Bherlin Gildo – who fought for a militant group in Syria – confirmed London’s role in backing Takfiri insurgents battling Damascus. In his defense, Gildo’s lawyers introduced evidence that British intelligence agencies “were supporting the same Syrian opposition groups as he was, and were party to a secret operation providing weapons and non-lethal help to the groups, including the Free Syrian Army.” Confronted with this contradiction, the British court dropped all charges against Gildo, fearing more embarrassing evidence showcasing British complicity with Syrian rebels could surface during proceedings.[15]

In 2013, Roland Dumas, France’s former foreign minister, told a French television station that during a visit to Britain two years before the Syrian crisis began in 2011, British officials informed him of a secret plan to spark a rebel invasion of Syria.[16]

“Britain was preparing gunmen to invade Syria,” Dumas said, pinpointing the origins of the scheme to Israel which, according to Dumas, sought to oust a neighbouring regime hostile to its imperial ambitions in the Levant. Dumas then recounted a conversation he had with an unnamed Israeli prime minister who allegedly told him ” that the countries in the Middle East that get in the way of Zionist objectives for the region would be swiftly eliminated”.

In an April 2014 report entitled “The Red Line and the Rat Line,” [17] journalist Seymour Hersh uncovered British involvement with a CIA-led covert operation in Benghazi, Libya, wherein the Agency was secretly channeling the looted weapons stockpiles of the fallen Gaddafi regime to Western-backed Syrian rebels through a “rat line.” Commenting on Hersh’s report, The Independent’s Patrick Cockburn described the CIA/MI6 “rat line” project in Benghazi as a “supply chain for the Syrian rebels overseen by the US in covert cooperation with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.” [18] He summarized Hersh’s findings in more detail as follows:

“The information about this comes from a highly classified and hitherto secret annex to the report by the US Senate Intelligence Committee on the attack by Libyan militiamen on the US consulate in Benghazi on 11 September 2012 in which US ambassador Christopher Stevens was killed. The annex deals with an operation in which the CIA, in cooperation with MI6, arranged the dispatch of arms from Mu’ammer Gaddafi’s arsenals to Turkey and then across the 500-mile long Turkish southern frontier with Syria. The annex refers to an agreement reached in early 2012 between Obama and Erdogan with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar supplying funding. Front companies, purporting to be Australian, were set up, employing former US soldiers who were in charge of obtaining and transporting the weapons. According to Hersh, the MI6 presence enabled the CIA to avoid reporting the operation to Congress, as required by law, since it could be presented as a liaison mission.”


In addition to conniving with the US and Israel to arm Takfiri rebel gangs that eventually overran Gaddafi and continue to menace Syria, the British government has also covertly collaborated with Wahhabi extremists in its own country who serve as cartoonish fodder for anti-Muslim war on terror propaganda. In a May 2013 report for the Asia Times, security scholar Nafeez Ahmed disclosed that the British-based Salafist group Al Muhajiroun has been secretly supported by the British intelligence services since its inception in 1996.[19]

That group has spawned nearly all of the supposed Islamic extremists implicated in (and perhaps framed for) various attacks in Britain, including the alleged ‘shoe bomber’ Richard Reid, the alleged Woolwich killers of British soldier Lee Rigby, the alleged 7/7 bombers and many others accused or convicted of terrorism-related offenses. Ahmed contends that various dubious personalities acting as leaders of Al Muhajiroun over the years – including Abu Hamza, Omar Bakri, Haroon Rashid Aswat and Anjem Choudary – have been clandestine agents of British intelligence fronting as ‘Islamic radicals.’

Despite his vocal support for al-Qaeda and ISIS, outwardly championing their grotesque bloodletting in Syria and Iraq today, Anjem Choudary (the current leader of Al Muhajiroun which has re-branded and re-named itself several times) is left untouched by British authorities and appears frequently on mainstream media. How can this impunity be explained if Choudary and his organization are operating independently without state protection? “Almost every major terrorist attack and plot in the UK has in some way been linked to Choudary’s extremist network,” noted Ahmed in the aforesaid piece, yet the radical preacher and his organization “[continues] to function with impunity in new incarnations.”

“[T]hrough Al Muhajiroun,” Ahmed explained, “MI5 is spawning many of the plots it lays claim to successfully foiling – as the FBI is also doing.” The MI5-controlled front group essentially serves a dual purpose: 1) it functions as a repository for Muslim patsies used in US-Israeli-British false flag operations, and 2) it acts as a recruiting hub for Wahhabi-Salafist mercenaries wielded as cannon fodder in various battle zones where Western/Zionist geopolitical and economic interests are at stake.

Unraveling the Web of Intrigue

Those not learned in the dark arts of black operations will likely be confused by all of this. “The West is fighting a war on Islamic extremism,” the indoctrinated lemmings will proclaim with confidence, completely unaware that they are being played for fools by professional spooks trained to employ artifices against the masses.


The surface rhetoric that politicians employ is merely a pack of daft lies intended to divert attention from the real agendas that drive policy. The public is fed a steady diet of cover stories and feel-good rationales – fanciful tales of good vs. evil ­– to pacify adverse reactions to and deflect unwanted attention from nefarious plots designed to benefit rich people and their interests.

David Cameron himself inadvertently identified whom some of these wealthy string-pullers are: Jewish Zionists committed to overturning every regime in the Middle East that is not yet subordinated to Tel Aviv. The other half of that equation includes an assortment of profiteering Anglos, Americans, Europeans, Arabs, Russians, Chinese and other money-mad opportunists. The Cameron’s, Obama’s, Harper’s, Hollande’s and Merkel’s of the world are mere screens or dummies for the real power behind the throne: the unscrupulous financiers, oligarchs and speculators who dominate Wall Street and the City of London, and to a lesser extent Shanghai and Moscow.

The Zionists, however, seem to be the most organized, the most aggressive and the most committed to living out their grandiose messianic dreams. Whether that vision entails a “New Middle East” in which “Greater Israel” rules the roost or a global government headquartered in Jerusalem remains to be seen. Either way it spells disaster for most of the world’s peoples.


[1] “Parents may cancel children’s passports in war on IS,” The Week, July 20, 2015.


[3] Seymour Hersh, “The Redirection,” The New Yorker, March 5, 2007.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Elad Benari, “ISIS: Fighting ‘Infidels’ Takes Precedence Over Fighting Israel,” Israel National News, July 8, 2014.

[7] Herb Keinon, “’Israel wanted Assad gone since start of Syria civil war’,” Jerusalem Post, Sept. 17, 2013.

[8] “ISIS Threatens To Topple Hamas In Gaza,” Reuters, July 1, 2015.

[9] “Isis blamed for Gaza City bomb attacks,” The Independent, July 20, 2015.

[10] “ISIS Allies Target Hamas and Energize Gaza Extremists,” New York Times, June 30, 2015.

[11] “ISIS supporters claim attack on Hamas base in Gaza Strip,” Russia Today, May 8, 2015.

[12] “UN details Israel helping Syrian rebels at Golan Heights,” Russia Today, Dec. 8, 2014.

[13] “Head of Syrian army after alleged airstrikes: Israel working with ISIS and al-Qaida,” Jerusalem Post, Dec. 7, 2014.

[14] “’Israel strike’ kills Hezbollah men in Syria’s Golan Heights,” BBC News, Jan. 18, 2015.

[15] “Terror trial collapses after fears of deep embarrassment to security services,” The Guardian, June 1, 2015 .


[17] Seymour Hersh, “The Red Line and the Rat Line,” London Review of Books, April 17, 2014.

[18] Patrick Cockburn, “MI6, the CIA and Turkey’s rogue game in Syria,” The Independent, April 13, 2014.

[19] Nafeez Ahmed, “UK pays price for MI5 courting terror,” Asia Times, May 30, 2013.

Posted in PoliticsComments Off on The War on Conspiracy Realists Continues

Shoah’s pages