Archive | April, 2016

1,000 troops, 300 neo-Nazis enter Odessa


1,000 troops, 300 neo-Nazis enter Odessa as city prepares to commemorate May 2 massacre victims.

29.04.2016, Odessa.

Approximately one thousand Interior Ministry National Guard troops are heading to Odessa to join 3 thousand law enforcement officers, as well as 300 “Azov” neo-Nazi regiment militants from Mariupol to “secure order” during the commemoration of the victims of May 2, 2014 massacre.

Odessa region SBU administration informed that the streets of the city are already being patrolled by “mobile counter-terrorist groups in combat vehicles.

Reporter Aleksandr Poluev informed that light armored vehicles are already spotted on the streets of Odessa, Ukrainian media report.

On May 2, 2014, with the silent permission of local authorities, neo-Nazis chased “Antimaidan” supporters to the Trade Unions House of Odessa, blocked them inside and set the building on fire. As a result, 46 people were burned alive, another 200 were injured. Armed Nazis surrounded the building and were beating everyone who managed to escape the burning building, inflicting heavy injuries. International organizations, including the UN, pointed out that there never was any objective investigation of the massacre.


More on the topic: May 2, 2014 Odessa massacre


Militiaman from Odessa talks about the events of May 2, 2014:

Russell “Texas” Bentley’s video on the situation in Odessa after the city was taken over by modern Ukrainian fascists:

Posted in UkraineComments Off on 1,000 troops, 300 neo-Nazis enter Odessa

Yemen is a Classic Western Imperialist War

Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem,Sr


Like Syria and Ukraine, Yemen is on the front lines of Zionist expansion. 
“This was all done on my iPhone. No electricity and only solar power means away with my laptop. Sanaa has been completely off the grid for a year.” 
The indifference of Westerners to atrocities committed by our governments 
in Yemen is another example of our political paralysis and hypocrisy. 
Reporting from Saan’a, HA believes, Yemen is humanity’s shinning hope and example against the satanic Anti-Christ New World Order” 
by HA
Saan’a: The War on Yemen is probably the most underestimated and unreported newsworthy story of of our lifetime. There is a reason why. An embarrassing 20-nation coalition (led by US, Israel and Gulf States spearheaded by Saudi Arabia) defeat in Yemen proves that the world has a chance against this satanic Rothschild onslaught.
Saudis have been known to adhere to an age-old warning of Yemen by their late father. ‘Your prosperity and your demise is from Yemen’; words of wisdom that has rung in the ears of his children and successors up until the death of King Abdullah when things began to spiral out of control for the Saudi royals.  The meaning: If Yemen were left alone to flourish and develop it would mean their end.  But if Yemen is left to decline, that this too would bring about their demise.
The Saudis were first tested in Yemen’s 1962 revolution against the Zaydi (moderate Shia sect) Imam of Yemen. The Saudis favored the monarchy style rule of the Imam in opposition to democracy. Ironic that over 50 years later, Saudis would favor western-backed ‘democracy’ against the Houthis who are Zaydi and led by an Imam like young Abdul-Malik Al-Houthi.


[Ibrahim Al-Hamdi, the JFK of Yemen]
For over 50 years, the Saudis have been terrified of change in Yemen. So much so that when a humble and ambitious leader, Ibrahim al-Hamdi, left, assumed position of presidency in Yemen in 1974 and attempted to lift the country he was quickly neutralized. Most historians and researchers believe the Saudis to be main culprits and benefactors of his assassination which was sparked when Al-Hamdi claimed Yemeni borders all the way into Makkah. The Kaaba has a corner which was named by the Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) ‘Al-rukun Al-Yemani’ or ‘the Yemeni corner’.
Former President Ali Abdullah Saleh who took the presidency a couple of years after the assassination of Al-Himdi enjoyed full support of the Saudi crown. For 33 years, Saleh worked hand in hand with the Saudis in abiding all-round corruption, destabilizing Yemen through Al-CIAduh and promotion of Wahhabi doctrine, robbing the country of its riches and keeping Yemen under the de facto control of Saudi rule. A simple example of this is Yemen’s ‘National’ Airline, Al-Yemenia which is co-owned by Saudi Arabia.
In the Muslim Brotherhood, the Saudis found the perfect opposition to Saleh. They supported both sides just as dictated in the protocols of Zion, but when Saleh overstepped by unifying both north and south Yemen in 1990, the Saudis knew that they were slowly losing him and soon would have to deal with him. Enter the ‘Arab Spring’.

download (1).jpeg

[Move over Bashar Al-Assad: Ali Abdullah Saleh former Yemeni dictator and Saudi puppet now is zionists most wanted man]
The so-called ‘Arab Spring’ gave the Zionists and their loyal servant monarchies including Morocco and Jordan a pretext to topple any nationalist leaders in the region. Mubarak, Assad, Saleh and Qadafi all had to go. They were becoming loose canons and over zealous for sovereignty from the dictation of Saudi Arabia/Zion. This is why the ‘Spring’ did not even blossom in places like Morocco or Jordan.
General Ali Mohsin and then Vice-President Abdu Rubu Masour Hadi were to be to Saleh what LBJ was to JFK. Mohsin, the highest ranking military man in Yemen and without a doubt the most corrupt individual in the country collaborated with Hadi and the Saudis to takeout Saleh. A failed assassination attempt on Saleh in his presidential place mosque was the wake up call Saleh needed to realize Saudis no longer needed him.
In February 2012, Saleh was convinced through an agreement called ‘the gulf initiative’ to step down and hand power to his
Vice President Hadi in exchange for immunity from prosecution. The agreement gave Hadi two-year interim presidency until elections are held. Two years later under Hadi, terrorism exploded in Yemen. What once was one of the strongest militaries in the region was crippled with a series of terror attacks, assassination and defragmentation.
Subsidies lift on fuel was the straw that broke the camel’s back. In Mid-2014 the Hadi government increased the price of fuel which ignited what was to become the revolution of September 21, 2014 when Sanaa fell in the hands of the revolutionaries. Hadi and Ali Mohsin fled to Saudi Arabia where they still are being touted by Saudis and the UN as legitimate government of Yemen.


[Abdul-Malik Alhouthi, 36 years of age first came to prominence in 2004 at age 24 as he formed his group Ansarullah who fought 6 wars (2004-2010) against Saudi-backed Ali Abdullah Saleh government]
In Sanaa, however an alliance was being formed. The once sworn enemies of each other through six wars spanning six years, Saleh and Al-Houthi formed a pact against the Muslim Brotherhood and their Zionist masters, the Saudis.
Six months after the revolution, on March 26, 2015, the war on Yemen was announced by Saudi FM from Washington. This was long before the formation of what was later called ‘the Arab coalition’. Insinuating a conflict the Zionist handlers hope to be a Arab/Sunni bloc versus Persian/Shia bloc bloodbath to clear way for Greater Israel to commence.
The axis if evil (Israeli-US-UK) war on Yemen is evident in the full support and supply of hardcore internationally banned weapons such as neutron, phosphorous and cluster bombs, all of which were heavily used since the start of the onslaught late March 2015. Hospitals, schools, wedding halls, marketplaces, houses, farms, children, women, animals all have been targeted in the over arial 100,000 bombs dropped. Housings for the orphans and blind were not spared.


The year-long blockade and bombardment of Yemen has caused a humanitarian catastrophe unlike any witnessed in recent age. Never has a nation and a people been under such a vicious attack and such adversity for wanting to break free from the Rothschild/Zionist hegemony.
Over a year later, the people and revolutionaries of Yemen have been steadfast. Yemen’s Army and popular Committee fighters /Ansarallah have been successful in causing the Saudis and zionists huge loses all across the board. Only 9 Toshka rockets and three Scud missiles fired thus far against the occupying forces have lead to thousands of military-men, including high ranking generals, blackwater mercenaries and paid African soldiers dead. A miraculous feat considering barefooted fighters with decades old arms and rockets. The Americans as well as the Israelis who lost 20 generals in one Scud blast are asking themselves; what do you do when it is God who is firing?
One March 26, 2016 millions of Yemenis took to the street of Sana’a and other cities to show their firm stand against this cowardly onslaught and in support of the Yemeni army and Ansarullah fighters. An estimated and never witnessed before gathering of 7-10 million people paralyzed the capital from morning till sunset. 
Overcoming a conspiracy spanning over five decades and war unleashed by the satanic Anti-Christ order known as the UN, Yemenis are still defiant and adamant to break free from this global enslavement. Proving yet again that Yemenis are the time-tested people and the toughest fighters on earth.

– See more at:

Posted in Saudi Arabia, YemenComments Off on Yemen is a Classic Western Imperialist War

Seymour Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libya’s Sarin to Syrian Rebels

Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem,Sr

Image result for clinton cartoons

The great investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, in two previous articles in the London Review of Books («Whose Sarin?» and «The Red Line and the Rat Line») has reported that the Obama Administration falsely blamed the government of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad for the sarin gas attack that Obama was trying to use as an excuse to invade Syria; and Hersh pointed to a report from British intelligence saying that the sarin that was used didn’t come from Assad’s stockpiles. Hersh also said that a secret agreement in 2012 was reached between the Obama Administration and the leaders of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, to set up a sarin gas attack and blame it on Assad so that the US could invade and overthrow Assad.

«By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria». Hersh didn’t say whether these «arms» included the precursor chemicals for making sarin which were stockpiled in Libya, but there have been multiple independent reports that Libya’s Gaddafi possessed such stockpiles, and also that the US Consulate in Benghazi Libya was operating a «rat line» for Gaddafi’s captured weapons into Syria through Turkey.

So, Hersh isn’t the only reporter who has been covering this. Indeed, the investigative journalist Christoph Lehmann headlined on 7 October 2013, «Top US and Saudi Officials responsible for Chemical Weapons in Syria» and reported, on the basis of very different sources than Hersh used, that «Evidence leads directly to the White House, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey, CIA Director John Brennan, Saudi Intelligence Chief Prince Bandar, and Saudi Arabia´s Interior Ministry».

And, as if that weren’t enough, even the definitive analysis of the evidence that was performed by two leading US analysts, the Lloyd-Postal report, concluded that, «The US Government’s Interpretation of the Technical Intelligence It Gathered Prior to and After the August 21 Attack CANNOT POSSIBLY BE CORRECT». Obama has clearly been lying.

However, now, for the first time, Hersh has implicated Hillary Clinton directly in this «rat line». In an interview with, Hersh was asked about the then-US-Secretary-of-State’s role in the Benghazi Libya US consulate’s operation to collect weapons from Libyan stockpiles and send them through Turkey into Syria for a set-up sarin-gas attack, to be blamed on Assad in order to ‘justify’ the US invading Syria, as the US had invaded Libya to eliminate Gaddafi. Hersh said: «That ambassador who was killed, he was known as a guy, from what I understand, as somebody, who would not get in the way of the CIA. As I wrote, on the day of the mission he was meeting with the CIA base chief and the shipping company. He was certainly involved, aware and witting of everything that was going on. And there’s no way somebody in that sensitive of a position is not talking to the boss, by some channel».

This was, in fact, the Syrian part of the State Department’s Libyan operation, Obama’s operation to set up an excuse for the US doing in Syria what they had already done in Libya.

The interviewer then asked: «In the book [Hersh’s The Killing of Osama bin Laden, just out] you quote a former intelligence official as saying that the White House rejected 35 target sets [for the planned US invasion of Syria] provided by the Joint Chiefs as being insufficiently painful to the Assad regime. (You note that the original targets included military sites only – nothing by way of civilian infrastructure.) Later the White House proposed a target list that included civilian infrastructure. What would the toll to civilians have been if the White House’s proposed strike had been carried out?»

Hersh responded by saying that the US tradition in that regard has long been to ignore civilian casualties; i.e., collateral damage of US attacks is okay or even desired (so as to terrorize the population into surrender) – not an ‘issue’, except, perhaps, for the PR people.

The interviewer asked why Obama is so obsessed to replace Assad in Syria, since «The power vacuum that would ensue would open Syria up to all kinds of jihadi groups»; and Hersh replied that not only he, but the Joint Chiefs of Staff, «nobody could figure out why». He said, «Our policy has always been against him [Assad]. Period».

This has actually been the case not only since the Party that Assad leads, the Ba’ath Party, was the subject of a shelved CIA coup-plot in 1957 to overthrow and replace it; but, actually, the CIA’s first coup had been not just planned but was carried out in 1949 in Syria, overthrowing there a democratically elected leader, in order to enable a pipeline for the Sauds’ oil to become built through Syria into the largest oil market, Europe; and, construction of the pipeline started the following year.

But, there were then a succession of Syrian coups (domestic instead of by foreign powers – 195419631966, and, finally, in 1970), concluding in the accession to power of Hafez al-Assad during the 1970 coup. And, the Sauds’ long-planned Trans-Arabia Pipeline has still not been built.

The Saudi royal family, who own the world’s largest oil company, Aramco, don’t want to wait any longer. Obama is the first US President to have seriously tried to carry out their long-desired «regime change» in Syria, so as to enable not only the Sauds’ Trans-Arabian Pipeline to be built, but also to build through Syria the Qatar-Turkey Gas Pipeline that the Thani royal family (friends of the Sauds) who own Qatar want also to be built there.

The US is allied with the Saud family (and with their friends, the royal families of Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Bahrain, and Oman). Russia is allied with the leaders of Syria – as Russia had earlier been allied with Mossadegh in Iran, Arbenz in Guatemala, Allende in Chile, Hussein in Iraq, Gaddafi in Libya, and Yanukovych in Ukraine (all of whom except Syria’s Ba’ath Party, the US has successfully overthrown).

Hersh was wrong to say that «nobody could figure out why» Obama is obsessed with overthrowing Assad and his Ba’ath Party, even if nobody that he spoke with was willing to say why. They have all been hired to do a job, which didn’t change even when the Soviet Union ended and the Warsaw Pact was disbanded; and, anyone who has been at this job for as long as those people have, can pretty well figure out what the job actually is – even if Hersh can’t.

Hersh then said that Obama wanted to fill Syria with foreign jihadists to serve as the necessary ground forces for his planned aerial bombardment there, and, «if you wanted to go there and fight there in 2011-2013, ‘Go, go, go… overthrow Bashar!’ So, they actually pushed a lot of people [jihadists] to go. I don’t think they were paying for them but they certainly gave visas».

However, it’s not actually part of America’s deal with its allies the fundamentalist-Sunni Arabic royal families and the fundamentalist Sunni Erdogan of Turkey, for the US to supply the salaries (to be «paying for them», as Hersh put it there) to those fundamentalist Sunni jihadists – that’s instead the function of the Sauds and of their friends, the other Arab royals, and their friends, to do. (Those are the people who finance the terrorists to perpetrate attacks in the US, Europe, Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, India, Nigeria, etc. – i.e., anywhere except in their own countries.) And, Erdogan in Turkey mainly gives their jihadists just safe passage into Syria, and he takes part of the proceeds from the jihadists’ sales of stolen Syrian and Iraqi oil.

But, they all work together as a team (with the jihadists sometimes killing each other in the process – that’s even part of the plan) – though each national leader has PR problems at home in order to fool his respective public into thinking that they’re against terrorists, and that only the ‘enemy’ is to blame. (Meanwhile, the aristocrats who supply the «salaries» of the jihadists, walk off with all the money.)

This way, US oil and gas companies will refine, and pipeline into Europe, the Sauds’ oil and the Thanis’ gas, and not only will Russia’s major oil-and-gas market become squeezed away by that, but Obama’s economic sanctions against Russia, plus the yet-further isolation of Russia (as well as of China and the rest of the BRICS countries) by excluding them from Obama’s three mega-trade-deals (TTIP, TPP & TISA), will place the US aristocracy firmly in control of the world, to dominate the 21st Century, as it has dominated ever since the end of WW II.

Then, came this question from Hersh: «Why does America do what it does? Why do we not say to the Russians, Let’s work together?» His interviewer immediately seconded that by repeating it, «So why don’t we work closer with Russia? It seems so rational». Hersh replied simply: «I don’t know». He didn’t venture so much as a guess – not even an educated one.

But, when journalists who are as knowledgeable as he, don’t present some credible explanation, to challenge the obvious lies (which make no sense that accords with the blatantly contrary evidence those journalists know of against those lies) that come from people such as Barack Obama, aren’t they thereby – though passively – participating in the fraud, instead of contradicting and challenging it? Or, is the underlying assumption, there: The general public is going to be as deeply immersed in the background information here as I am, so that they don’t need me to bring it all together for them into a coherent (and fully documented) whole, which does make sense? Is that the underlying assumption? Because: if it is, it’s false.

Hersh’s journalism is among the best (after all: he went so far as to say, of Christopher Stephens, regarding Hillary Clinton, «there’s no way somebody in that sensitive of a position is not talking to the boss, by some channel»), but it’s certainly not good enough. However, it’s too good to be published any longer in places like the New Yorker. And the reporting by Christopher Lehmann was better, and it was issued even earlier than Hersh’s; and it is good enough, because it named names, and it explained motivations, in an honest and forthright way, which is why Lehmann’s piece was published only on a Montenegrin site, and only online, not in a Western print medium, such as the New Yorker.

The sites that are owned by members of the Western aristocracy don’t issue reports like that – journalism that’s good enough. They won’t inform the public when a US Secretary of State, and her boss the US President, are the persons actually behind a sarin gas attack they’re blaming on a foreign leader the US aristocrats and their allied foreign aristocrats are determined to topple and replace.

Is this really democracy ?

Posted in USA, LibyaComments Off on Seymour Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libya’s Sarin to Syrian Rebels

BAHRAN ZIONIST REGIME: سادية الديكتاتور تؤكد اقتراب نهاية عهده الاسود

Image result for king of bahrain cartoon
Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem,Sr
انتصار ارادة الشعب واضحة وجلية لمن اراد ان يستوعب حقيقة ما يجري في ارض اوال البحرين. وقد جاء القرار الخليفي الشهر الماضي يتصعيد وتيرة القتل خارج القانون وذلك بتخويل الجيش باطلاق الرصاص الحي على المتظاهرين السلميين، ليؤكد ان ثورة البحرين ليست مستمرة فحسب، بل صامدة ومنتصرة بعون الله تعالى. فلو ان الخليفيين انتصروا لما احتاج الطاغية لاعلان احكام الطواريء مجددا، ولما اصدر رمز التعذيب في البلاد تصعيد العدوان على المناطق الآمنة وخطف المواطنين والتنكيل بعلماء الدين. لو انتصرت العصابة الخليفية المجرمة لما احتاجت لاصدار قرار جديد بشن الحرب على “حزب الله وولاية الفقيه”. العالم لم يسمع من قبل عن حرب عسكرية ضد مفاهيم ومصطلحات. فما معنى الحرب العسكرية على ولاية الفقيه؟ هل هذا يعني ارسال الطائرات الخليفية لطهران وقصف منزل الولي الفقيه؟ هل سيكرر الديكتاتور الذي ما يزال متربعا على كرسي الحكم بدعم قوات الاحتلال الاجنبية، الجريمة التي ارتكبها في اليمن ثم ارتدت عليه هزيمة منكرة دفعته للهرب من ساحات القتال؟ العقلاء لا يمكن ان يحكموا على تصرفات كهذه الا انها رعناء ومجنونة ولا تعبر عن عقل او حكمة. فالعدوان السعودي على اليمن ورط العصابة السعودية في مستنقعات حرب ليس لها نهاية الا بسقوطهم، ودفع صدام حسين لشن عدوان على الكويت ادت الى سقوط حكمه في النهاية. هذه السياسات لا يمارسها الا المعتوهون ومن هيمن غرور العظمة على عقولهم، فاصبحوا يتصرفون بعواطف شيطانية سرعان ما تؤدي بهم الى الجحيم. لقد اتضح الآن ان المغامرة السعودية في اليمن لم توفر لها احتراما من احد، بل اظهرتها مستجدية من الامريكيين انواع ا لسلاح الفتاك، ومعتمدة بشكل كامل على الدعم الاجنبي بدون حياء او وجل. ولكن يبدو ان العصابة الحاكمة في البحرين ما تزال تنطلق على اساس بقائها حليفة للعصابة السعودية، وهي تعلم ان منطقة الخليج ستشهد توترا بين السعوديين وبقية المناطق الاخرى. وبرغم الدعم الانجلو � بريطاني اصبح السعوديون مدينين للسعودية، ومطالبين باتباع سياستها وعدم الخروج على قراراتها. وليس مستبعدا ان تحدث مشادات صعبة مع السعوديين والبريطانيين والامريكيين نتيجة هذا التكالب على ما بايدي الشعب من ثروات، خصوصا لجهة انتمائه لهذه التربة منذ قرون. ولا شك ان شعور الخليفيين بالغربة واحد من دوافعهم للتنكيل بالسكان الاصليين الذين ابعدوا عن مراكز اتخاذ القرار، وتم اقصاؤهم الى القرى والارياف.
ثورة البحرين جاءت لتنتصر ولتطوي صفحة الاحتلال الخليفي الذي تجاوز حدوده وبلغ نهاية طريقه. القرار الرسمي بتخويل قوات الجيش والمرتزقة باطلاق الرصاص الحي على المتظاهرين السلميين تعبير عن حالة يأس هيمنت على العصابة الحاكمة وابعدتها عن التفكير السوي، فاصبحت تتصرف بمنطق المتعطشين للدماء، الراغبين في الانتقام، الخاسرين الحرب والسلام. وجاءت زيارة الرئيس الامريكي، باراك اوباما، الشهر الماضي للسعودية لتوجيه تحذير اخير من مغبة استمرار المشروع السعودي المؤسس على الحقد والطائفية والتطرف والارهاب، وان امريكا ستدعم هذه العائلات الحاكمة بشرط ان تعيد النظر في موقفها ازاء الارهاب والمجموعات المتطرفة التي تقطع اراضي شبه الجزيرة العربية من الشمال الى الجنوب ومن الشرق الى الغرب. الشعب البحراني لم يخرج أشرا ولا بطرا، ولا مفسدا ولا ظالما، بل انطلقت ثورته بعنوان الاصلاح وانهاء فصول الظلم السوداء واقتلاع اسباب الشر ورموزه وعناصره. في زمن تهيمن فيه القبائل على المجتمعات المتحضرة، وتستعبد رجالها وتقتل شبابها ونساءها، لم يعد هناك مجال للتعايش بين منظومتين: وطنية تحررية تهدف لاقامة حكم الشعب بتوافق مكوناته، وقبلية تنطلق للحفاظ على مصلحة افرادها ومناصبهم والاموال التي نهبوها من الوطن والشعب. انطلق شعب البحرين لتحرير الذات اولا، والعقل ثانيا، والجسد المثخن بالجراح ثالثة. ولهذا يصر على تحقيق مطالبه بدون قيد او شرط، ولا يقبل باي حوار يفضي لاستعادة عناصر القبيلة الحاكمة مواقعهم التي استغلوها في الماضي للفساد والافساد ونشر الفوضى والاعتداء على القيم الانسانية والدينية للشعب البحراني الاصلي.
ان مطالب الشعب ليست خاضعة للنقاش، فهي ليست عملية بيع او شراء، بل قضية استعادة حقوق مسلوبة منذ عقود، وهوية شعب استهدف في دينه ومذهبه وعرقه، وعنوان حرية يصر الثائرون على استعادتها كاملة غير منقوصة، ومعاقبة العناصر التي تسببت عبر العقود الماضية في استضعاف الشعب وتاخير نهضته وتمزيق صفه وبيع سيادته على ارضه. انها مطالب مشروعة لا يمكن التخلي عن بعضها او كلها، ولا يحق لاحد المساومة عليها. فالحرية اما ان تؤخذ كاملة او ستتحول الى شعار فضفاض غير ذي شآن، ولا مجال لانتصاره. كان شباب الثورة واعيا ماذا يريد حين اطلق صرخاته في 14 فبراير 2011: الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام. وكرر هذه الشعارات طوال السنوات الخمس الاخيرة، رافعا قبضات يديه لتهز الهواء وتكرر هتاف الحرية الخالد. في هذا الخضم من الحوادث والتطورات، تطل ثورة البحرين برأسها مصداقا لمقولات الثورة السلمية التي تصر على المطالب ولا تساوم على الوسائل، ترفع شعار السلم ولا تمارس غيره. لقد طرح المناضل الاستاذ حسن مشيمع مفاهيم عديدة حول المقاومة المدنية، هادفا لتعميق الوعي بها ولتحويلها الى مشروع عمل تغييري سياسي شامل. وما تزال كلماته تتردد اصداؤها في نفوس محبيه من السائرين على طريق الثورة والراغبين في تحقيق اهدافها. ومن وراء القضبان كثيرا ما تصك اسماع الثوار كلمات احد الرموز والقادة، مؤكدة صممود الشعب والثورة على المطالب ورفض المحاولات الخليفية شق الصف ا لوطني بوعود فارغة واجراءات قمعية مغلفة بما يوحي بعكسها. لقد مل الشعب هذه الاساليب، وعمد لاعادة صياغة اولوياته ضمن مشروع عمل سياسي واسع يتصل بالشعب من جهة، وينطلق وفق قواعد اللعبة الدولية من جهة اخرى، ويخلص لشعاراته بتحويلها الى برامج عمل فاعلة تهدف لايقاظ الشعب ودفعه لحماية نفسه ورفض القبول بانصاف الحلول. مشروع التغيير الذي رفعت الثورة شعاره ثابت لا يتغير، فهو يطالب العصابة الخليفية بتسليم السلطة للشعب، ويؤسس لنظام حكم يحترم الشعب خصوصا السكان الاصليين (شيعة وسنة)، ويلغي مشروع التغيير السكاني الذي اقترب مؤخرا من الابادة الجماعية للسكان الاصليين. مشروع التغيير هذا يؤسس لدولة مدنية عصرية على مبدأ “لكل مواطن صوت”، ويساوي بين كافة السكان بدون التمييز على اساس الدين او المذهب او العرق، ويخطط لاستعادة السيادة على البلاد من المحتلين الاجانب خصوصا السعوديين. كما انه يخطط لاقامة حكم القانون، بدلا من قيم القبيلة والاعراف والولاء للديكتاتور. وهذا يعني ان التغيير آت بعون الله، وان كره الطغاة والمتجبرون والمحتلون.
قد تختلط الاوراق احيانا بين من يدعو للتغيير الشامل ومن يسعى للتعايش مع العصابة الخليفية، وهذا امر طبيعي، خصوصا ان بصائر البشر تختلف واهدافهم تتباين، وقدراتهم على تحمل المعاناة غير متساوية. لكن الاساس الذي توافق عليه الجميع، كما جاءت على لسان الشيخ الاسير، علي سلمان اننا لن نسلم رقابنا مرة اخرى للخليفيين. فلا رجعة للماضي الذي استحوذ فيه الخليفيون على كل شيء. الشعب بدأ مشواره على طريق التغيير ولن يتوقف حتى تتحقق تلك المطالب. هل سيستطيع ذلك؟ الامر المؤكد ان الطغاة لا يبقون اذا أصرت الشعوب على ازاحتهم، وان النصر حليف المؤمنين الصابرين، بوعد الهي لا يتغير، وان الظروف الاقليمية والدولية هي الاخرى في حالة تموج واضطراب لاسباب عديدة من بينها السياسات السعودية والخليفية الداعمة لمجموعات التطرف والارهاب. لذلك اصبح سقوط نظام الظلم الخليفي حقيقة مبرمة بعون الله تعالى.
اللهم ارحم شهداءنا الابرار، واجعل لهم قدم صدق عندك، وفك قيد أسرانا يا رب العالمين
حركة احرار البحرين الاسلامية
29 ابريل 2016

Posted in Arabic, BahrainComments Off on BAHRAN ZIONIST REGIME: سادية الديكتاتور تؤكد اقتراب نهاية عهده الاسود

Obama’s Legacy: al-Qaida’s Protector-in-Chief

Image result for Obama’ AS BIN LADEN CARTOON
by executive editor Glen Ford 

President Obama continues to play his three card monte game in Syria, pretending to wage an all-out war against ISIS, while at the same time helping al-Nusra, al-Qaida’s terrorist army in Syria, blend in with the other jihadists armed and financed by the United States and its allies. With Russian help, the Syrian Army may soon be in position to march against the ISIS capital, in Raqqah, and to drive al-Qaida from the country’s second largest city, Aleppo. If that happens, it would signal the final unraveling of a nearly four decades-long U.S. policy of using fundamentalist Islamic jihadists as foot soldiers for U.S. imperialism, in partnership with Saudi Arabia. That’s what is driving the Saudi monarchy crazy, because, if the jihadists are defeated in Syria, they are certain to turn on their Saudi paymasters and the other infinitely corrupt monarchies in the Persian Gulf. What goes around, eventually comes around.

And, that’s why President Obama is sending 250 more Special Forces troops into Syria, supposedly to train more of those phantom “moderate” rebels that the Pentagon last year admitted do not exist. The real number of U.S. troops in Syria and Iraq is certainly much higher than the U.S. is admitting. These U.S. soldiers are attempting to rearm and unite all of the smaller terrorist groups that are integrated with al-Qaida – that is, everyone except ISIS.

The Russians aren’t fooled one bit by Obama’s terrorist shell game. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has resisted U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s proposals to carve Syria up into so-called zones of interest,” a phony kind of cease-fire that would prevent the Syrian government from taking back its national territory. Lavrov is telling the U.S. that any so-called rebels that are caught fighting alongside al-Qaida will be killed, just like al-Qaida, and that the national sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria is not subject to negotiation.

The Russians and the Syrian government not only have international law firmly on their side, but also the relevant United Nations Security Council resolution, which calls on the entire world to fight against both ISIS and al-Qaida’s Nusra Front. The U.S. voted for the resolution, and President Obama has repeatedly stated that Washington respects Syria’s national sovereignty. Obama is lying, of course – but then, the U.S. war on terror is probably the greatest lie of the 21st century, and a big part of the 20th century, too.

The U.S. presence in Syria is totally illegal – which is why Obama has to cloak it in terms of American self-defense against ISIS, despite the fact that ISIS grew by leaps and bounds until the Russians intervened and forced the Americans to pretend to wage war against it. The U.S. troops’ main job is to arm the various brands of al-Qaida fighters with heavy weapons, and to act as a “trip wire,” daring the Russians to bomb areas of the country where American troops are active. In other words, he is prepared to go to war with Russia to defend the terrorist armies he has unleashed on Syria.

Obama will end his term in office as the protector-in-chief of al-Qaida. What a legacy for the First Black President.

Posted in USAComments Off on Obama’s Legacy: al-Qaida’s Protector-in-Chief

What Kerry’s ‘Absolute Lines’ in Syria Really Mean

Image result for John Kerry CARTOON

US Secretary of State John Kerry wants to draw “absolute” lines across Syria to create the Western “areas of influence” there. Such an approach resembles nothing so much as neo-colonialism, experts say.

The idea to create spheres of influence in Syria voiced recently by US Secretary of State John Kerry clearly indicates that Washington continues to pursue its Plan B in Syria.

In his interview with The New York Times editorial board Kerry narrated that the White House proposed to draw clear lines in Syria to the Kremlin.

“We’ve even proposed drawing a line, an absolute line, and saying, ‘You don’t go over there, we don’t go over here, and anything in between is fair game.’ And they are considering that, and I think we will get there in the next week or so,” Kerry told the editorial board.

However, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry, such an approach is oversimplified.

“This approach is slightly simplistic. The principal goal is to fight against terrorism [in Syria],” Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said during a press conference on Monday, as quoted by RIA Novosti.

It should be noted that Kerry’s ‘offer’ followed the Saudi-backed High Negotiations’ Committee (HNC) decision to suspend its participation in the Geneva talks on April 21.

On that day most HNC members left Geneva in protest against the ongoing violence in Syria which they blindly blame on Damascus.

The HNC is well-known for its anti-Assad stance. However, by no means the entity represents the Syrian opposition as a whole. The HNC brought together Saudi-backed rebels in Syria, including notorious Ahrar ash-Sham and Jaysh al-Islam groups which actually share the same Islamist ideology as Daesh and al-Qaeda’s affiliate al-Nusra Front.

A day after the HNC demarche Lavrov called attention to the fact that besides the HNC there are also the Moscow and Cairo groups, Hmeymim group and the group of independent opposition members which express their willingness to continue the dialogue with Damascus over the situation in Syria.”Some people have already left [the Syrian opposition’s] High Negotiations Committee [HNC]. They disagreed that radicals ruled the committee, including Jaysh al-Islam leaders. This fact confirms that we were right while proposing to include it in the list of terrorist groups… This group, as well as Ahrar ash-Sham are actively proving in action that they fully support those anti-humane, brutal approaches used by Daesh and Jabhat al-Nusra [al-Nusra Front],” the Russian Foreign Minister underscored.

According to Elena Suponina, President of the Center for Asia and the Middle East at the Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, John Kerry’s offer to divide Syria into spheres of influence with Russia means that Washington now regards Moscow as an equal player in the Middle East.

In her Op-Ed for RIA Novosti Suponina recalls, that four years ago the Obama administration did not even bother to take Russia’s interests in the region into consideration.

However, in general, the White House continues to demonstrate a double-standard approach toward Syria and other regional players, according to the expert.

“It looks as if the colonial epoch and the times of re-division of the world by global powers have returned” Suponina writes, calling attention to the fact that Western policy-makers (most notably John Kerry himself) have repeatedly claimed that it is highly inappropriate to behave “in 19th-century fashion” in the 21st century.

And now Kerry proposes to draw “absolute lines” across the Middle Eastern region, she remarks, warning that Syria is “only the beginning.”

Kerry’s “fair game” in Syria will most likely prompt more destruction and devastation. Is Washington ready to take responsibility for chaos in the region?

On the other hand, Kerry’s proposal looks rather controversial since it was Russia, not the US that was invited to Syria by the legitimate Syrian government.

In his interview with Radio Sputnik political scientist Alexander Kamkin echoed Suponina’s stance.”Genuine peace still looks a way off and it looks like the Western nations still hope to implement the Libyan scenario in Syria… They use the war with Daesh as just a means of building large coalitions, but if you look at the previous such campaigns you will see that our American ‘partners’ rarely practice what they preach,” Kamkin told Radio Sputnik.

Hans-Christof Von Sponeck, former UN Assistant Secretary-General, expressed his concerns regarding the fact that Washington continues to conduct a “series of experiments” in Syria.

“The Americans are never short of experiment, never short of trying something new… It is jumping from one laboratory test to another, and in the meantime the country continues to go further towards a destroyed nation,” Sponeck told Russia Today.

Interestingly enough, it seems that there is no concordance in Washington regarding what to do next in Syria.

US President Barack Obama said Sunday that he does not support the idea of creating so-called “safe” or “buffer” zones in Syria as it would need Washington’s deeper military involvement in the region.

At the same time, Obama has signaled that 250 US Special Operation Forces troops will be soon deployed in the war-torn country.

Read more:

Syrian Parliament Election: Washington Unable to Strangle Assad’s Legitimacy

Déjà Vu? ‘West Prepares Libyan Scenario for Syria’

Posted in USA, SyriaComments Off on What Kerry’s ‘Absolute Lines’ in Syria Really Mean

Zionist journalist: Sisi would accept a Palestinian state in Sinai


Image result for Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi CARTOON

Zionist journalist has called on Nazi Benjamin Naziyahu to exploit the readiness of Zionist puppet Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi to concede Egyptian land in return for money to solve the conflict with the Palestinians.

Haggai Segal, the editor of the Zionist newspaper Makor Rishon, wrote: “Al-Sisi’s concession of Tiran and Sanafir islands shows that Arabs do not revere the land. Al-Sisi conceded the two islands for money.”

The journalist, who is very close to Naziyahu, added: “Two years ago, Al-Sisi showed his willingness to accept the establishment of a Palestinian state in Sinai. This makes us expect reaching an agreement with Al-Sisi and the Palestinian Authority (PA) regarding this in return for a respectable sum of money.”

“We have to measure the idea of establishing a Palestinian state in Sinai based on the equation: land for shekels.”

Segal was a member of a terrorist Jewish organisation that planned to destroy Al-Aqsa Mosque in the 1980s. He also carried out a number of explosions that killed and wounded scores of Palestinians, including heads of West Bank municipalities.

Two years ago, Nazi Army Radio revealed that Zionist puppet Al-Sisi suggested the creation of a Palestinian state in Sinai in return for Palestinian concession of the West Bank.

Both Egypt and the Palestinian Authority denied the report, however many Nazi officials, including the Education Minister Nazi Naftali Bennett, confirmed the proposal had been put forward.

Meanwhile, former Nazi ambassador to Cairo Zvi Mazel said Al-Sisi recognises the size of the economic crisis his regime is currently facing and is therefore “ready to concede Egypt’s respect and dignity and ignore the constitution for financial support.”

Posted in Palestine Affairs, ZIO-NAZI, EgyptComments Off on Zionist journalist: Sisi would accept a Palestinian state in Sinai

NATO pledges to boost military presence in Eastern Europe

Press TV 

1037262262NATO has pledged to expand its military presence in Eastern Europe to protect its partners and allies from potential threats as the US sends two of the world’s most advanced warplanes to Romania.

In a speech at the University of Bucharest in Romania on Tuesday NATO Deputy Secretary-General Alexander Vershbow discussed the main issues the Western alliance is facing.

He said the alliance is struggling with many complex risks apart from the “destabilizing actions” of Russia and “the tide of instability which has swept across the Middle East and North Africa.”

“We are also wrestling with other complex risks and threats to our cyber security, to our energy supplies, and in the case of international terrorism to the safety of the people on our streets,” he said.

Vershbow said NATO is doing everything to respond to these challenges, adding that “the alliance takes a 360 degree approach to deterring threats, to protecting its member nations and if necessary to defending them.”

“That presence will be rotational, multinational, and combat capable. It will thereby send a clear message to any potential aggressor that if they violate NATO’s territory, they will face strong response from the whole alliance; Americans, Europeans and home defense forces,” he said.

The NATO secretary general also said that the organization has “set up a series of small headquarters, including here in Romania, to support planning, training and re-enforcement.”

“We are intensifying our maritime patrols, exploring the need for increased military and exercises, providing support to partners like Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova and encouraging efforts to strengthen energy security,” he said.

US sends F-22 Raptors to Romania

Vershbow’s comments came a day after the US sent two F-22 Raptor fighter jets to Romania as part of the commitment to NATO security.

The fighter jets, which travel at twice the speed of sound, touched down in Romania, close to the Black Sea and Ukraine, the Crimean Peninsula and Russia.

A US statement said the aircraft possess sophisticated sensors which would allow pilots to track, identify, shoot and destroy air-to-air threats without being detected.

The dispatch of the fighter jets, which can also attack surface targets, came two weeks after Russian fighter jets buzzed an American warship in the Baltic Sea.

The Western military alliance has been deploying troops and equipment close to Russia’s borders since it suspended all ties with Moscow in April 2014 after the Crimean Peninsula integrated into the Russian Federation following a referendum.

The United States and its European allies accuse Moscow of destabilizing Ukraine and have imposed a number of sanctions against Russian and pro-Russia figures. Moscow, however, rejects having a hand in the Ukrainian crisis.

This as Moscow has on many occasions slammed the Western military alliance’s expansion near its borders, saying such a move poses a threat to both regional and international peace.

Posted in USA, EuropeComments Off on NATO pledges to boost military presence in Eastern Europe

Drones kill more civilians than manned war planes. Why? That’s a state secret

Image result for OBAMA Drones CARTOON

In his first public comments on the US drone campaign in Pakistan, President Obama described it as “a targeted, focused effort at people who are on a list of active terrorists who are trying to go in and harm Americans, hit American facilities, American bases, and so on.” In 2011, then-national security advisor to the president John Brennan said of the CIA drone campaign that “there hasn’t been a single collateral death because of the exceptional proficiency, precision of the capabilities we’ve been able to develop.” Popular American mythology in the Obama era has held that drones are the surgeon’s tool in the endless, global war on terror. American soldiers and spies can knock off terrorists without bogging down the military in ground occupations, or killing civilians.

So says the myth. The reality is starkly different, according to scholar Micah Zenko.

Zenko examined civilian deaths from US military operations and found that drones kill more civilians than do piloted US aircraft—not fewer. “Drones are far less precise than airstrikes conducted by piloted aircraft, which themselves also conduct “precision strikes.”Drones result in far more civilian fatalities per each bomb dropped,” Zenko writes.

Zenko’s analysis shows us that the claims officials have long made about the supposed accuracy of drone strikes are dead wrong. But we don’t know why, in part because the US government refuses to disclose basic information about how it designates drone targets, or under what circumstances commanders order killings. It could be, as Zenko posits, “that the standards that need to be met before authorizing a [drone] strike are less rigid than Obama’s purported principle of “near certainty that the terrorist target is present.” This wouldn’t be surprising given that Obama continued the George W. Bush administration’s practice of “signature strikes” — killing anonymous suspected militants who appear to be associated with terrorists based upon their observable activity.”

If that’s the case, the US public and the victims of drone strikes have a right to know. But government secrecy and judicial evasiveness have conspired to keep us all in the dark about even the most basic legal theories upon which the CIA and military base their drone programs.

That secrecy has recently been reified. Just last week, a Washington D.C. federal appeals court tossed an ACLU lawsuit against the CIA seeking information about its drone operations. The court sided with the government, holding that releasing information about the drone program “could reasonably be expected to damage national security.”

As ACLU attorney Jameel Jaffer said, “Secret law is always invidious, but it’s particularly so here because of the subject matter.” Now we know the stories officials have been telling us for years about the laser-like accuracy of drone strikes are false. But thanks to secret law, we don’t know why.

Posted in USAComments Off on Drones kill more civilians than manned war planes. Why? That’s a state secret

Illegal Nazi settler visits impose severe restrictions on Palestinian presence in al-Khalil

Posted by: Sammi Ibrahem,Sr

Occupied Palestine – During this week’s Jewish ‘Pessach’ celebrations from 22nd to 29th April, Nazi Jewish settlers and Nazi forces throughout occupied al-Khalil (Hebron) have been taking over Palestinians houses, rooftops, streets and entire areas while denying passage for Palestinians.

Settlers 'celebrating Pesaach' while Palestinians are denied access to the area

Settlers ‘celebrating Pesaach’ while Palestinians are denied access to the area

Last Friday night, with the start of the ‘holiday’, large groups of Nazi Jewish settlers were going from the illegal Nazi Kiryat Arba Camp on the outskirts of al-Khalil, towards the Ibrahimi mosque, 60% of which has been taken over by the Jewish Nazi settlers that installed a ‘synagogue’ following the 1994 Ibrahimi mosque massacre; while Palestinians were stopped, frisked and delayed.

Israeli forces taking over the roofs of Palestinian family homes

Nazi forces taking over the roofs of Palestinian family homes

On Monday and Tuesday, Palestinians’ movement was entirely restricted and H2 was completely void of any Palestinian presence in order to facilitate the settler’s freedom of movement and to enable a space for the main ‘Pessach celebrations’. During these two days the checkpoint at the Ibrahimi mosque has remained closed, thus closing off the main entrance for Palestinians heading to the mosque. Palestinians were entirely barred from entering the mosque during these two days, while Nazi Jewish settlers used the additional 40% of the mosque that has so far remained for Palestinians – with the ‘usual’ entry restrictions and harassment by Nazi forces.

closed Ibrahimi mosque checkpoint barring Palestinian movement

Closed Ibrahimi mosque checkpoint barring Palestinian movement

While bus loads of Nazi Jewish settlers from all over Palestine are arriving in the Old City of al-Khalil, new barricades, entry and movement restrictions for Palestinians are springing up throughout the city. Al-Faiha’a girls school, right opposite the parking lot used for the settler only buses, has been forced to finish early in order to at least attempt to provide a safe way home for the girls, despite the heavy army and settler presence.

During Monday and Tuesday, a sharp decrease in the number of girls attending school was noted by both the teachers and international human rights defenders offering protective presence. Nazi forces have also taken control of two shops right next to the school building and turned it into a military base.

Israeli forces moving into the building next to the girls school

Israeli forces moving into the building next to the girls school

On Monday, Nazi forces escorted endless groups of settlers on a ‘tour’ through the main Palestinian market in the Old City during the busy noon hours – blocking the narrow alleyways while giving a Zionist version of the history of the city. Palestinians were stopped and forced to wait for the tours to pass. One Palestinian man was arrested while another one was seriously injured when settlers threw a rock into the Palestinian market hitting him right on the head.

Despite the area behind Shuhada checkpoint being H1 and thus supposedly under full Palestinian control, Nazi forces on Tuesday brought large groups of settlers, after ‘clearing’ the area for bombs, in a sheer show of their power and in total disregard of any (international) agreement. Shuhada checkpoint has during the ‘holiday’ season seen repeated and arbitrary delays, causing Palestinians to wait for, at times, hours to be allowed to go to their homes located in the ‘closed military zone’ while settlers were freely roaming the streets and could be seen from the checkpoint chit-chatting with the soldiers.

Posted in Palestine Affairs, ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Illegal Nazi settler visits impose severe restrictions on Palestinian presence in al-Khalil

Shoah’s pages