Archive | April 18th, 2017

Exposing why Trump Bombed Syria (VIDEO)!



Kevork Almassian of Syriana Analysis joins Henrik of Red Ice TV to discuss what’s really happening in Syria and what the US airstrike, issued by Trump, means for the country.

He shows that the reason for the attack on the Shayrat base was to destroy the air defenses on that base. Trump succeeded in destroying the Shayrat airbase air defense systems. This same Shayrat base was used by Syria to target Israeli war planes and drones attacking Syria. Trump attacked Syria to protect Israel!

This debunks both the MSM claim that Trump attacked the Shayrat base because that is where the planes that supposedly committed the chemical attack came from and the equally insane proposition pushed by Journalist Thierry Masson who claims that Putin, Trump and Assad coordinated this attack to save Trump from being impeached and to take the heat off him about ties with Russia. Thierry had written in his article “Donald Trump asserts his authority over his allies”

“Donald Trump ordered his troops to fire cruise missiles on an almost empty base, after having given advance notice to the whole world, including Russia and Syria.

“Damascus, by sacrificing this base and the lives of a few men, gave him the authority to carry out a vast action against anyone who uses chemical weapons…”

No Thierry, the damage that the attack was meant to accomplish was the destruction of the air defenses at Shayrat. Trump succeeded in doing this along with killing 14 people with one of them being a Syrian brigadier general along with other key officers and innocent children. No Thierry, Assad would never sacrifice his key officers, innocent children and the destruction of the air defenses at the Shayrat Base to save Trump’s presidency. He and Putin would never go along with that.

Check out the video for more:

A YouTube view is presented below for those who may not be able to access the video natively above:



Posted in SyriaComments Off on Exposing why Trump Bombed Syria (VIDEO)!

Nazi Media: When shooting a teen in the back is a ‘professional error’



972 MAG – An IDF brigade commander shot a Palestinian teen who threw a rock at his jeep, while the boy was running away, and then left him bleeding on the road. Initially, the colonel claimed his life was in danger. With each subsequent interrogation, the story changed. The military police determined the incident was a ‘professional error’ –  bad aim – and closed the case despite evidence that tells a very different story.

On July 3, 2015, Col. Yisrael Shomer, then-commander of the IDF’s Binyamin Brigade, was driving towards the Qalandiya checkpoint in the West Bank. Mohammad al-Kasbeh, a 17 year-old Palestinian, threw a large rock at the windshield of Shomer’s vehicle, and started to flee. The Binyamin Brigade commander stepped out of the car, fired two bullets into the back of the fleeing boy, and left him wounded and bleeding on the ground without offering any help. Kasbeh died from his wounds. The military police file was closed with no indictment filed, and Col. Shomer was promoted to commander of the IDF’s Southern Command.

Now, for the first time, our investigation reveals that a subordinate soldier who was with Shomer at the time of the shooting testified to Military Police investigators that neither man was in immediate danger, and that his commander failed to follow the protocol for arresting suspects. Furthermore, while Shomer claimed that the boy was holding an object, the soldier testified that that the boy held nothing. Video analysis of the incident, made possible by these testimonies, also showed that the entire shooting was documented, and contradicts Shomer’s claim that he fired in the air.

What follows is a review of the Military Police’s file, the changing versions of the officer’s testimony (especially after B’Tselem released video footage documenting the shooting), the contradictory testimonies of the soldiers who were with Shomer that day, and the decision of the Military Advocate General (MAG) not to file an indictment against the IDF colonel.

Last month, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) filed an appeal to the High Court of Justice demanding that the army prosecute Shomer for murder, or at least negligent manslaughter. The appeal is based on the military’s own investigation file, reviewed in this article, and the crux of the argument is that Col. Shomer was not in mortal danger when he fired into the boy’s back.

A lethal threat that wasn’t

On the morning of the incident, around 6:30 a.m., Binyamin Brigade Commander Col. Yirael Shomer was driving in his vehicle with three other soldiers on the road between Jabah and Qalandiya. Shomer’s second in command, who had passed through the same spot a few minutes prior, reported that stones were being thrown along the route. Accordingly, the soldiers in the vehicle testified they were aware that they might also be targeted by stones. “We were alert following the announcement,” one solider testified during his first interrogation, according to the investigation file.

When the commander’s jeep, moving relatively slowly, reached the intersection, Mohammad al-Kasbeh approached the vehicle and threw a rock at the windshield from close-range. The rock smashed the windshield, but did not enter the vehicle. After the rock had been thrown and the boy began to run, Shomer and his radio man, D., got out of the car and chased Kasbeh.

Shomer fired three shots, two of which hit the boy: one in the upper back and one in the neck. The officer and the soldier approached and saw Kasbeh injured and bleeding on the ground, yet left the scene without calling for medical assistance and without trying to help the dying boy, who succumbed to his wounds shortly after.

In its initial report to the media, the army claimed that Kasbeh threw a stone, and Col. Shomer returned fire. Government ministers rushed to Shomer’s defense. “A stone kills,” wrote Minister Miri Regev. Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked, paraphrasing Jewish religious texts, said “He who comes to kill you, hurry to kill him.” Shomer said his life was in danger, and that he therefore acted legally when he fatally shot the teenager. However, security camera footage from a nearby gas station — which captured part of the incident and was published by B’Tselem — shows without a shadow of a doubt that Shomer’s version of the truth is false, and that the shooting took place during a chase, after the boy had thrown the rock and attempted to escape.

Three stone throwers, or one teenager?

The military police’s initial interrogation of the three soldiers and their officer took place at noon on the day of the incident, about six hours after the shooting of Kasbeh and after everybody had participated in an operational debriefing during which each person heard the others’ version of events. At this point, it’s critical to note, they were unaware of the existence of security footage. According to their version, there was a planned ambush: “In front of us were two cars which stopped driving, deliberately as I understood it, in order to set an ambush and to force us to stop the jeep and serve as a target for the rock throwers,” Shomer said in his first interrogation, and his soldiers corroborated this description of events.

According to documents from the first interrogation, the narrative of all four was that their car was trapped after two cars stopped in front of them, blocking their route. When B’Tselem published the video, this version of the story collapsed. All four were summoned to further interrogations, and confronted with the inconsistencies.

At first they repudiated these claims, and according to investigation documents, claiming that the video was forged. Soldier A. testified, “You see ‘B’Tselem’ in the upper right corner, so I think it’s a fake.” But after they were convinced by military police that the video was authentic, that even the head of the police’s digital imagery division confirmed its authenticity, the soldiers’ testimonies began to change. This time, there was no ambush: they stopped after the stone was thrown. There weren’t any cars blocking them: they could have driven away but chose to stay. Not unreasonable behavior, but it negated the original claim that they had they not left the vehicle, they would have been in mortal danger.

Back to the first interrogation. The three soldiers and the officer initially testified that at least three young men, each holding a rock, attacked the stopped vehicle. “I see… a Palestinian holding a rock… close behind him, on the left, there are two more Palestinians, also holding rocks in their hands,” testified Col. Shomer to the military police. “At the time of the throwing the Palestinian is in zero-range, that is to say less than a meter from the jeep, and when the jeep stops completely he moves away after he throws the rock. When I exit the jeep, I’m standing about 5 or 10 meters from the jeep, and he’s about 15 meters away.”

A few months later, when military investigators threatened to charge S., one of the soldiers who was in the jeep, with obstructing the investigation, he admitted that there was only one teenager present, not three. Yet in the first statement by the IDF Spokesperson, broadcast on Israel’s Channel 2, there was talk of an “angry crowd” throwing stones.

Then, the commander decided to ‘unload’ — that is, to leave the vehicle, after which, he claims: “I shoot a bullet in the air, shout ‘Hello’ or ‘Waqf’ in Arabic, something like that, and shoot a bullet in the air at a 90 degree angle, so I won’t harm anyone in the vicinity, god forbid. After that, I still feel my life is in danger, from the three of them, two of them still with stones in their hands, so I shoot in the direction of the Palestinian who threw the rock and is holding something in his hand — two shots, aimed at the knees and below.” It’s not clear whether Shomer meant to say 60 degrees, or if he is unfamiliar with the army’s arrest procedure which specifies that firing in the air should be done at a 60 degree angle.

Contradictory testimonies

Along with Shomer, soldier D., who served as the brigade commander’s radio man, also exited the jeep. According to D.’s testimony, he himself knelt, yelled “Waqf!,” and pointed his weapon at Kasbeh’s legs. Before he managed to finish the arrest procedure, according to documents from the second interrogation, he says that he heard three shots and the youth fell. When he was asked during the interrogation if the commander had shouted at Kasbeh, as is required when attempting to arrest a suspect, D. gave a [crushing] response: “I didn’t hear, to your question, I would have heard if he was shouting.” In other words, Shomer’s subordinate claims that his commander failed to follow the full protocol for apprehending a suspect.

When asked specifically if Col. Shomer even initiated the arrest procedure, D. refused to answer, claiming that he only knows the answer to this question from the operational debriefing, and that this is information the military police shouldn’t be exposed to.

In fact, in the first interrogation, D. refuted part of Shomer’s version of the story. “After he threw the stone and we exited the vehicle, that Palestinian, individually, was not life-threatening in my opinion,” testified the soldier. This evidence is critical.

In his second testimony, D. added that after the shooting had ended, he rose from a kneeling firing position. This occurs in the 23rd second of the video. Until that moment, Col. Shomer is still in the frame, and so is his weapon. That is to say, the whole shooting is documented. The video clearly shows that the colonel did not aim his weapon at the sky. He exits the vehicle with his gun aimed at the fleeing Palestinian boy – not firing in the air, as he claimed. This also reveals his failure to carry out the arrest procedure as required.

Mohammad Kasbeh was not shot in the legs, where Shomer claims to have aimed. One bullet pierced his back and exited his chest, and the other entered the back of his neck and was lodged in his jaw. Shomer does not admit to shooting the boy in the back. “He stood facing me, half-turned, at an angle towards me,” he insisted during interrogations. The commander also claimed he fired because he saw something in the boy’s hand. But D., who did not look away from Mohammad, is sure that there was nothing. “He ran in a straight line away from me with his hands in fists,” D. testified during his second interrogation. “I didn’t see any object or weapon in his hands.”

From the moment that the stone was thrown to the fatal shooting, Kasbeh can be seen running in the video, except for the last moments in which he leaves the frame. Shomer himself testified that Kasbeh held a “rock” in both hands when he slammed it into the jeep and then began to flee, but this was before the escape.

Moreover, according to the testimony of Shomer, which was contradicted by A.’s testimony, there were two other youths who held “rocks,” as he put it, and he felt that his life was in danger. Yet he didn’t shoot the two youths holding rocks, although he testified that “after the first shot the Palestinians remained in place, and posed a lethal threat.”

Later, it also seems that Shomer didn’t fear them at all when he approached the seriously-wounded Kasbeh. In his second interrogation, Shomer claimed that under the open-fire regulations at the time of the incident, it was permissible to shoot a Palestinian who carried out an attack and fled, and that these guidelines only changed after the incident at Qalandiya. Yet higher-ups didn’t change the orders, only clarified them to explain that one only fires to kill in the case of mortal danger. Furthmore, the orders have always prohibited lethal fire toward anyone who does note pose a lethal threat.

Abandoning a wounded person

The problematic conduct of the Binyamin Brigade commander, Yisrael Shomer, didn’t end with the shooting. “I see him fall, get a bit closer to assess the situation. I understand that he’s injured and I understand that in that situation its best to do everything I can to leave the situation, in order to prevent further harm on both sides,” testified the senior officer during his first interrogation. In another instance during the interrogations he said, “I didn’t see where I hit. I was aiming towards his knees, later I approached until I was almost two meters from him and I couldn’t see where I had hit at all.”

D. remembers differently. “He approached so that he was standing right over the Palestinian’s body, leaned forward, then down, looked a few seconds at the Palestinian — to answer your question, I didn’t see him touch the local — and then he stood up and said, ‘He’s dead, we’re leaving’” — so says the soldier of his commander.

D.’s testimony is supported by Lt.-Col. S., head of the Jerusalem District Coordination and Liaison Administration, the first to talk to Col. Shomer when he arrived at the Qalandiya checkpoint after the shooting: “The colonel entered the checkpoint agitated and pale… he said ‘I hit someone in the head,’ he said he saw pieces of the head on the street, on the ground, on the concrete, I don’t remember which word he used.” When asked if he was certain, he stresses: “He definitely said there was a head wound. He stated that he had seen pieces of head or brain on the ground.”

Even if we accept Shomer’s version of events, it still appears that the officer shot a boy in the back and left him bleeding on the road without medical treatment or without calling for help. Shomer didn’t even bother to call an ambulance to treat the dying Kasbeh. Instead, according to D., what Shomer was concerned with at the time was photography: “The moment we entered the vehicle the colonel was yelling ‘Documentation! Documentation!’ we didn’t have time to document…”

During his first interrogation, the colonel signed a document consenting to take a polygraph test if asked to do so. Later, with his twisting and conflicting stories, he hired a civilian attorney who advised him not to take the test. The file notes a number of exchanges between the interrogators, the brigade commander and the civilian attorney, at the end of which Shomer decides not to undergo such an examination.

The brigade commander’s misdirection

In April 2016, the Military Advocate General decided to close the case without charging Shomer. According to the military police, the implementation of the arrest procedure was justified, and the fatality of the shooting was due to a professional error — that is to say, Shomer aimed for the knees and hit the back and neck by accident. This, he claims, is because Shomer was running while firing his weapon, rather than looking through the crosshairs. He entirely ignored the fact that Shomer then abandoned the injured Kasbeh. The MAG’s ruling that Shomer correctly carried out the arrest procedure is entirely contradicted by the video and D.’s testimony, which point to the opposite conclusion.

Yet another finding revealed in the investigation file is that Shomer tried to persuade investigators to determine that the case was a “professional error.” He tried to stop the boy, but “missed” and shot him twice in the neck and back. “I didn’t mean to kill the Palestinian,” he said in his final testimony, which took place in October. “I’m not a vengeful person… I didn’t mean to kill him, I made a professional error, I wasn’t negligent. Soldiers in operational situations make mistakes, make errors. So long as it’s not a deliberate mistake, so long as it’s a professional error, we need to back them up.”

Response from the IDF Spokesperson

Yisrael Shomer referred us to the IDF Spokesperson for comment:

The IDF Spokesperson’s office stated: “The investigation shows that Col. Shomer carried out the shooting while in motion, and not in a static situation. Accordingly, the aim was imprecise and killed the Palestinian.

“The military police found that the fact that the shooting was carried out as part of a suspect detention procedure was justified in this context, and was intended to bring about the immediate detention of the rock-thrower. It was also found that firing while moving fell within in the range of a professional error on the grounds of the context in which the shooting was carried out, but that it was made in clearly operational circumstances. In the eyes of the military police, the incident does not cross the criminal threshold and does not justify taking legal action against the officer.”

The IDF spokesperson chose not to answer our questions about the changes Shomer made to his testimony before and after the video was revealed, about the military’s failure to address the contradictions in his various testimonies, about abandoning Kasbeh as he bled to death, or about the promotion that Shomer later received.


Posted in Palestine Affairs, ZIO-NAZI, Human RightsComments Off on Nazi Media: When shooting a teen in the back is a ‘professional error’

BBC Caught Fabricating Videos to Push Libya and Syria War Agendas


By the Editor,

Many find it difficult to believe the sheer boldness of the lies peddled by the British Broadcasting Corporation – the world’s largest and most ‘respected’ broadcasting organisation. Nevertheless, the BBC’s nefarious agenda has come to the fore during the wars on Libya and Syria, where it has taken every opportunity to justify foreign military intervention in both countries. In some cases the BBC has been quite ham-fisted in its attempts to deceive viewers, resulting in its foul play becoming readily apparent.

BBC claims footage of Indian protest is live feed from Green Square, Tripoli

The following video was aired on BBC News on Wednesday 24 August 2011. Watch from the 0:29 mark – the BBC airs footage that they purport to be live, from Green Square in Tripoli, Libya. The footage shows a crowd of ‘Libyan’ people celebrating and waving their national flag. What is so incredibly shocking about this report, is that the footage is not live, nor is it from Libya. It actually shows Indian protesters waving the Indian flag.

This unbelievable dishonesty on the part of the BBC was not an error. Such a first rate global broadcaster does not make such mistakes. It is simply not plausible that the BBC accidentally substituted a live video feed with an archive clip that, coincidentally, shows an identical scene to the one that the ‘live feed’ purports to show – jubilant protesters waving flags.

Not an error – BBC chose Indian footage due to similarities between flags

The truth of the matter is: jubilant crowds were simply not present in Tripoli, so the BBC had to use fake footage to convince its viewers of the Libyan ‘revolution’ myth.

Footage of Indian protesters waving the Indian flag was selected by the BBC because of the visual similarity between the two flags in question. Below I have juxtaposed the Indian flag (left), with the flag of the counter-revolution that took place in Libya.

As you can see, the flags are composed of similar colours; the Indian flag is green, white, and orange, whilst the flag of the ‘Libyan’ counter-revolution is green, black, and red.

Both flags are tricolour flags with horizontally orientated stripes, and both flags contain a circular emblem in the centre. The BBC chose to show the Indian footage because that footage provided the best opportunity to deceive unwitting viewers. To the untrained eye watching a fleeting video, these two flags are virtually indistinguishable.

BBC caught faking Syria ‘chemical weapons’ footage

Credit goes to Craig Murray for being the first to spot(1) this shocking example of deception from the BBC.

This BBC video report(2) was published on 29 August 2013 – the eve of the UK’s parliamentary vote for war on Syria to deter the use of chemical weapons(3). The section of the video that we are concerned with begins on the two minute mark.

The British doctor who is speaking to the camera says, “seems like it must be some sort of, I’m not
really sure, maybe napalm

Compare this video with the following one, also published by the BBC.(4) As before, view the video from the two minute mark.

Listen closely to the audio track of both videos. You will notice that the female doctor’s words and intonation are exactly the same in both videos, however the background noise in the second video is completely different. In addition, in the second video (contrary to the first video), the doctor can be heard to say: “seems like it must be some sort of chemical weapon I’m not really sure..”

The BBC has manipulated the audio track of this video report to characterise the event as a chemical weapon attack. Because the doctor’s mouth is covered by a mask, the dubbing is impossible to detect.

What is even more concerning is that there are serious questions about the authenticity of the event itself. At the beginning of the first video, Dr. Rola Hallam can be heard to say, “I need a pause, because it’s just absolute chaos and carnage here“. Now despite this seemingly impromptu plea to the cameraman from Hallam, there is convincing evidence(5)  to suggest that the video was not in fact live footage of the wounded being rushed in to a makeshift hospital. It is clear that Hallam actually did multiple takes of the video interview, whereby the movements of others were choreographed in line with her own movements. I highly recommend reading this analysis,(5) paying particularly close attention to the movement of the man in the high-visibility vest.

Notice how in one video, his hands are behind his back as he approaches Hallam, and in the other video, his hands are by his side. Furthermore, at this moment in one of the videos, a man can be seen looking through the fence above Hallam’s left shoulder, yet in the other video, he is not there. We are supposed to believe that this video sequence was filmed in an impromptu manner as victims were being rushed in to a makeshift hospital.

What is clear is that this is not a live sequence – the scene was clearly staged multiple times despite Hallam’s contrived ‘I need a pause here because it’s absolute carnage‘ opening gambit.

Dr. Rola Hallam has familial links to anti-Assad opposition groups

Dr. Rola Hallam’s maiden name is Al Kurdi. She retains her maiden name on her public Facebook profile:(6)
Dr. Rola Hallam's Facebook profile.

Below is her profile for ‘Atfal’,(7) ostensibly a charity set up to help Syrian children. She uses the same photograph, but goes merely by the name “Hallam”.


Her father – Dr. Mousa Al Kurdi – is also a doctor. Two months before the BBC’s apparently contrived chemical weapons report, Mousa Al Kurdi, was publicly kvetching about chemical weapons being used in Syria(8) in an attempt to expedite a larger-scale foreign intervention.

In the following clip, Dr. Mousa Al Kurdi talks to Al Jazeera about how he addressed the Friends of Syria summit, where he called for foreign intervention and arming of the Free Syrian Army.

Dr. Rola ‘Al Kurdi’ Hallam is also related to Colonel Malek Al Kurdi, who is deputy leader of the ‘Free Syrian Army’.(9)

Keeping in mind Dr. Rola Hallam’s background and family links to the anti-Assad opposition, the BBC’s apparent staging of propaganda and usage of Hallam in particular becomes all the more sinister.

Examples such as these are the reasons why no well-informed person takes the BBC seriously any longer.


(1) Fake BBC Video – – 7 October 2013.
(2) Syria crisis: Incendiary bomb victims ‘like the walking dead’ – BBC News, 29 August 2013.
(3) Syria crisis: Cameron loses Commons vote on Syria action – BBC News, 30 August 2013.
(4) Syria: Agony of victims of ‘napalm-like’ school bombing – BBC News, 30 September 2013.
(5) Dr Rola –
(6) Facebook profile page of Rola Alkurdi Hallam – – 4 January 2014.
(7) About Atfal –
(8) Video: Doctors record ‘chemical attacks’ in Syria – Al Arabiya News, 2 June 2013.
(9) Divisions, lack of arms underscore weakness of Free Syrian Army – The National, 3 March 2012.

Posted in Libya, Media, Syria, UKComments Off on BBC Caught Fabricating Videos to Push Libya and Syria War Agendas

ISIS is not ‘Blowback’ from Western Foreign Policy; They ARE Western Foreign Policy

The origins of ISIS.

The origins of ISIS.

By the Editor Notice that ISIS are sworn enemies of Syria, Hizbu’llah, and Iran. This in itself gives a most obvious clue as to the identity of the group’s benefactors.

A prevalent liberal cliché is the “blowback” theory – the theory that ISIS terror attacks, and indeed the group’s very existence, are somehow in retaliation to US/Western/”Israeli” foreign policy actions.

This is a disingenuous theory that is disseminated in order to keep the empire’s citizens on side. Crucially, it distracts from a key truth.

Western and “Israeli” intelligence has historically effected deep infiltration of ‘jihadist’ terror cells throughout the Arab world and the West; these groups are used literally as footsoldiers (see Afghanistan throughout the 1980s) to achieve Western and “Israeli” military and strategic objectives. The “blowback” theory distracts from this key fact.

ISIS aren’t retaliating against Western foreign policy; they are Western foreign policy. These very people were mobilised against Muammar Gaddafi in Libya’s bogus ‘revolution’ of 2011, as with Syria in the same year.

In moving across the Syrian-Iraqi border, ISIS – Zionism’s footsoldiers – underwent a magical media transformation into the ‘bad guys’. The ‘war against ISIS’ is a con, a total scam. It is a pretext for a war against the resistance axis: chiefly Syria, Hizbu’llah, Iran, and the Palestinian resistance. It is a pretext to kick the ‘Yinon plan’ – the plan to balkanise the Arab world to ensure “Israeli” hegemony – into high gear

The WMD lies of 2003 never went away; they simply got re-packaged for the liberal crowd in the post-Bush era.

Posted in Middle East, USA, ZIO-NAZIComments Off on ISIS is not ‘Blowback’ from Western Foreign Policy; They ARE Western Foreign Policy

Anti-Zionist Wit Vs. “Chosen” Gutterisms: Dieudonné and Imperialist Subservience To Jewish Supremacy

Anti-Zionist champion
and infuriator of the
European establishment.

by Jonathan Azaziah

The United Kingdom. That gleaming beacon of democracy. That illuminating shimmer of human rights. That incandescent emanation of justice. That grand representative of the poor, downtrodden and marginalized. That empire of benevolence which stands out in the history of not-so-benevolent empires. That crux of all that is good in a world gone so, so very bad.

An assessment of the utmost accuracy, right?

Wrong. Dead wrong.

More like that putrid vassal of World Jewry. That effervescently vile regime of “shabbos goyim”. That repugnant gang of invaders, occupiers, oppressors and Zionist-serving hellspawn. That detestable client state of the Talmudist Rothschild dynasty’s dominion (1), which has invaded 90% of the countries on the face of the earth (2). That hideous, colonist-breeding homeland of Benjamin Disraeli, the Jewish-Zionist prime minister who has sired generations of Zionist interlopers (3). That abhorrent origination point of one Arthur James Balfour, who sold Palestine to his “chosenite” overlords and thus put an official British stamp on the genocide to come (4). That spineless, gutless, yellowbelly but somehow still pompous gaggle of grovelers whose intelligence services were well aware of the attacks that Jewish terrorist groups like Irgun and Stern carried out against their nation, most prominently the infamous King David Hotel bombing, but did nothing to stop the flow of terror other than the conduction of a few cosmetic raids and arrest operations (5).

Splendiferous imperialist
delusions aside, the British
state is nothing but an
outpost of international

The United Kingdom. That rancid, corrupt, pathetic excuse for a country that inflicted the curse of Tony Blair on the world, whose premiership was controlled by a “Jewish cabal” (6), whose rise to political stardom began in an “Israeli” embassy in 1994 and who was nothing but a demented, warmongering tool for the likes of Lord Michael “Cashpoint” Levy (7) and Lord Peter Mandelson, the Zionist chieftain who assisted Levy in fomenting the “New Labor Revolution” scam (8). That violent, sanguinary, servile stooge of Zion that brought the coward Gordon Brown to power, who kneeled before the “Holocaust” idol on a visit to the Zionist occupation regime (9), declared his nation a “true friend” of the usurping Jewish entity (10) and still, still, STILL got burned in the end by the extremist Zionist operatives Jon Mendelsohn and property tycoon David Abrahams (11). That Global-South-destroying, racist, hateful isle of iniquity that took the likes of Blair and Brown and raised the stakes just a bit further with an even fouler creature: David Cameron, a product of literal Jewish royalty (12).

When the latter view of the UK is accepted as having a firm, irrefutable basis in reality and the former view of the UK is rejected as a fantasy situated somewhere between hogwash and poppycock, it is quite easy to understand why Dieudonné (or Dieudo for short), the French-Cameroonian comedic virtuoso and anti-Zionist activist who has been struggling against a systematic Jewish-Zionist censorship campaign for over a decade due to his challenging of the primacy of Jewish suffering and his pro-Palestine, pro-Iran, pro-Hizbullah, pro-Resistance, liberationist views, was declared “persona non grata” and prevented from setting foot on British soil (13). Home Secretary Theresa May, the official responsible for banning Dieudonné, was coerced into doing so by none other than the Board of Deputies of British Jews (14), arguably the most influential and heavy-handed Zionist Lobby group in the UK.

Sarah Silverman:
A leading voice of Jewish
“comedic” degeneracy.

The punchline is a glorious one though. While the politically dissident Dieudonné is barred from entering British territory on utterly and absurdly baseless grounds, subversive Jewish comedienne Sarah Silverman (15) and Jewish comedy mogul Larry David of “Seinfeld” and “Curb Your Enthusiasm” fame (16) make their way in and out with no issue. This is of the utmost significance due to the UK’s population being in the neighborhood of 82% Christian, compared to a staggeringly meager 0.02% Jewish. Silverman is widely known for her “I hope the Jews did kill Christ. I’d do it again. I’d fucking do it again — in a second” declaration (17), as well as her unspeakably obscene film“Jesus Is Magic”, which features a sex scene with her own twisted version of Jesus Christ. Larry David for his part did his own rendition of Jesus-defiling when he urinated on a picture of Christ in one of the more sickening episodes of his aforementioned show “Curb Your Enthusiasm” (18), which, for the record, has also featured chauvinistic, ultra-Zionist, anti-Palestinian tropes (19).

One is not inclined to offer advice to an empire on how to run its affairs in a more efficiently repressive manner, for as Palestinian academic and anti-orientalist pioneer Edward Said wrote in a July 2003 Los Angeles Times essay, “Every empire tells itself and the world that it is unlike all other empires, that its mission is not to plunder and control but to educate and liberate (20),” but some nuance and observation are exceedingly necessary. It transcends the limits of irony that Dr. Said penned a piece that was rightfully ferocious in its criticism of “US power” in a newspaper owned by billionaire scoundrel Sam Zell, a preeminent Zionist who has donated countless millions to synagogues, Jewish day schools, Mossad’s Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center and the “Israel” Center for Social and Economic Progress (21). Dr. Said was known for his sharp polemics and criticisms of Western hubris but in this instance, clearly, he failed miserably to be polemical or critical enough.

Larry David:
Raging, Christ-hating,
Zionist stalwart of
the smut-factory known
as Hollywood.

What needs to be intimately comprehended here, and it is a point that is interchangeable with the case of the UK rejecting Dieudo but accepting Silverman and David, is that while a brilliant intellectual like Said was able to unleash a tirade against American imperialism in a major mainstream newspaper without having to worry himself sick over any possible backlash, he could not utter a word about the ruling class, that is, the Jewish-Zionist ruling class, in which American imperialism is in service of. With more irony still at hand, in the same paper, an obnoxiously arrogant Zionist Jew can tickle his own fancy about Organized Jewish Interests controlling the media, Hollywood, Wall Street, the government, and, if it wasn’t nauseating enough, that he hopes this domineering trend will continue (22). Which then begs a rather obvious question: If the “American Empire” can be criticized, but “the Jews” cannot, despite the fact that “the Jews” openly brag about their status as worldbreakers and globebenders, who is really running the show here?

An empire is categorized by an amalgamation of neo-nationalism, xenophobia, warmongering euphoria, prevailing arrogance from the richest of the rich to the poorest of the poor, a culture of excess, decadence and a glorification of its leaders as demigods worthy of worship, sometimes even overtaking the place and necessity of religion itself. Religion, while disregarded on the spiritual and moral levels and stripped of any attribute that could amount to free-thinking or resistance, is then used by an empire to keep its citizenry in check, foster an identity that can be tapped into down the line for any imperialist adventurism surely to arise and also to create a false sense of hope and faith in a god misinterpreted.

Therefore, an empire of prestige, or state of note for that matter, will defend its “interests”, culture and identity and will not, under any circumstances, allow any individual or group even a scintilla of leg room to undermine its authority. So when the ostensibly “Christian” British state, known and hated the world over for its “Christian” missionary activities that cloaked so many if not all of its genocidal invasions, chucks its “Christian” identity to the wayside and castigates a man like Dieudonné, who identifies himself as an “Islamic-Christian (23)”, while welcoming filth-peddlers and desecrationists like Sarah Silverman and Larry David, it is betraying an upsetting truth that many Brits may not be able to accept: Their country is not the great power that they’ve been brainwashed into believing it is since birth. Their country is a subcontractor for a far more powerful, far more sinister force. Their country is not Christian. Their country has no love or respect for Jesus Christ The Messiah. Their country is not sovereign. Their country is on its knees, its forehead at the feet of the Rothschilds and other “chosenite” overlords. Their country is subservient to Jewish supremacy.

As is America. The US and UK regimes are empires and imperialists only in name, for they do not serve their own interests but the interests of Organized Jewry, which sends its Christ-hating spokespersons into the public eye to bash and humiliate what they allegedly hold most dear while they remain deafeningly silent. But when opponents of Zionist-subverted Western policy criticize the parasitic, plutocratic elite running the West into the ground, they are not greeted with the same silence. They are not even greeted with accusations of “anti-Westernism”. No, they are bombarded with the gobbledegook of “anti-Semitism”. Pounded with the sheer irrationalness of “Jew-hatred”. Browbeaten for spitting on the “memory” of the “Holocaust”. This is not just an exercise in hypocrisy alone. Hypocrisy represents the mere obviousness of the matter. This is proof, the kind comprised of unbreakable stone embedded in unshakeable ground, that imperialism, while a terribly real threat that must be combated and stopped, is only vice president in the hegemonic power structure; its agents are “shabbos goyim” and its boss is Zionism.

Gordon Brown
put the interests
of Zionist war criminals
above and beyond
the interests of the
nation he was prime
minister of.

Further confirming and interconnected with this very point is that the aforesaid British ex-premier Gordon Brown, under heavy pressure from the Jewish-Zionist Lobby (24), approved a change to its universal jurisdiction law that would protect “Israeli” war criminals from prosecution, including Tzipi Livni and Ehud Barak (25).

The message that the West and the British regime in particular are sending is as reprehensible as it is telling: Baby-killing, civilian-besieging, land-thieving “Israeli” war criminals should be protected, while those who condemn such acts of barbarity must be condemned themselves. Christ-hating, filth-slinging, egregiously offensive Jews like Sarah Silverman and Larry David must have their “freedom of speech” upheld, while those who stand against such disgracefulness must be declared “persona non grata”. Jewish interpretations of history must be imposed on the world, while those who have the gall to question it must be punished for sticking a knife in Jewish sensitivities. What is held so dear by 2 billion Christians and 2 billion Muslims must be disregarded, while Jewish “sanctities”, and this word is used tremendously loosely, must not simply be defended but paid homage to and even worshiped.

Moreover, Sarah Silverman and Larry David, described as “dirty Jews” who “assert their Jewishness emphatically” through anti-Christian attacks on “family-friendly culture” by Josh Lambert, an academic director of the Yiddish Book Center and visiting assistant professor of English at the University of Massachusetts (26), are not fringe elements of the global Jewish community. They are not extremists, cuckoos, cranks, or exceptions to some prevailing Jewish morality. They are in fact living, breathing manifestations of Jewish tradition. They can even be considered an extension of the Jewish smut peddlers that birthed and still dominate pornography in America. One of those Jewish porn kings, the notorious Al Goldstein, said that, “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks (27).”

Despite Jewish claims
to the contrary, the
Talmud is a book
of the most despicable racism 
and hatred, especially towards
Jesus Christ and his holy

So despite their secularism, atheism, agnosticism or whatever version of godlessness or spiritual ambiguity they claim to adhere to, the truth is, hatred of Isa al-Masih (Jesus Christ the Messiah) is the lifeblood of the Jewish religion-culture. Whether one reads the Talmud itself (28), the late, great Israel Shahak’s Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight Of Three Thousand Years” (29), Jesus In The Talmud” (30) by Professor Peter  Schäfer or all of the above, the shocking, hideous actuality is that Jews believe that Isa al-Masih is being boiled in hot excrement in the fires of hell for being a black magic and witchcraft practitioner, a sorcerer, a sexual deviant, an idolater, a person of wickedness, a self-mutilator and the son of a whore. Yes, even the pristine Mother Mary, championed by Muslims, Christians and humanity-embracing non-believers alike for her purity, steadfastness and courage, is assailed by the monstrous, supremacist, devilish Talmud.

With Dieudonné still being attacked, the latest of which being a failed attempt to link him to a video calling for the release of man who tortured and murdered a French Jew back in 2006 (31), as well a court order to remove certain parts of a Youtube video of his (32), a discussion is needed more than ever on what is the true root of the world’s hardships. It extends well beyond the parameters of the political gangsterism and criminal organization of Zionism and deep into the heart of Jewish Identity Politics.

Whether it’s a Zionist Jew like Rabbi Eli Ben Dahan, the illegitimate “Israeli” regime’s Deputy Minister of Religious Services, who declared that the hierarchy of the human species has “Jewish men who have sexual relations with Jewish women” sitting at the top, and “male goyim” and “female goyim” subsisting at the bottom (33), or an “anti-Zionist” Jew like Philip Weiss, who thinks that Jews count as “5/3 of a man” when it comes to commenting on the issues of the genocidal Zionist entity and its bullying lobby apparatuses (34), what lies at the core, what unites seeming opponents such as these, is their fundamental, visceral belief in Jewish supremacism. This horrific ideology, which is responsible for so much death, chaos, destruction and pain in every region of this precious planet, should not be excused; it shouldn’t be downplayed; it shouldn’t, under any circumstances, be whitewashed; it shouldn’t, no matter whose feelings get hurt, be capitulated to; it must be challenged, it must be beaten down, and, for the sake of humanity, it, alongside its trusty counterparts White Supremacy and Takfirism, must be sent back to the hellish dark ages from which it was initially spawned.

Jewish supremacy has
no place in a civilized world.

In a civilized world, the brotherhood of humanity should triumph over the tight-knittedness and arrogance of the few; tyrants should be disgraced and forced to bow humbled at the doorstep of the once wretched; invaders should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, a law that is derived from Divine Justice; those who desecrate what is sanctified should be banished to a fate so detached from normality that they will not be able to express their regret even after an infinite number of lifetimes pass; clannish guilds of capitalism, terrorism and imperialism will be pursued to the ends of the earth for every ghoulish crime that they committed. In a civilized world, Resistance will reign supreme and evil will perish. In a civilized world, supremacy of any kind, in any form, most especially one as barbarous as the Judaic incarnation, would be an anachronism.

What does it say about the state of this world that such a hateful, anti-human ideology is not only tolerated but applauded? What does it say about this world’s peoples who have allowed this ideology and its adherents to establish an Empire, a “Jewish Utopia”, with bases on just about every continent? It says that this world is not civilized, despite all attempts by the US-“Israeli” Empire and its Islamophobic, orientalist pundit network to convince us otherwise, and that this world’s people have been duped in an elephantine way. It says that this madness has to stop.

It says that this insanity is unacceptable, and that the Zionist-nuke-enforced doctrine of Jewish superiority over Gentiles is a categorical falsity; one that must be struggled against until it ceases tormenting the peoples of the Global South and Global North. As the Holy Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W.W.) declared, “All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor does a non-Arab have any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over black nor does a black have any superiority over a white except by piety and good action.” And also, “Just as the fingers of the two hands are equal, so are human beings equal to one another. No one has any right, nor any preference to rule over another. You are brothers.” These concepts are anathema to the Jewish supremacists and their cohorts.

Dieudonné understands
that the concept of
multi-ethnic solidarity
is key to overthrowing

We Gentiles should recognize the sagacious words of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W.W.) and reconcile them with the words of the prophet who came before him, Jesus Christ the Messiah (A.S.): “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand: And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand?” The words of the Messiah (A.S.) can be summed up in short: Division is synonymous with Zionism’s triumph, whereas unity is synonymous with Zionism’s failure. Dieudonné recognizes this clearly, hence why his brilliant comedy transcends ethnic, religious and national lines (13).

Our quest to bury Jewish supremacy and keep it buried should officially be dubbed “Operation United Against Zion”. And first on our takedown list are the pro-“Israel” gatekeepers who masquerade in “leftist” garb (35).

Those cowards, hypocrites and stooges who pay lip service to resistance; who pose as fronts for the Palestinian cause while denigrating its greatest allies, Hizbullah, Syria and the Islamic Republic of Iran; who declare their opposition to imperialism and capitalism but never name the names that implement these horrors “for fear of the Jews”; who outright reject the undeniable fact that Jewish-Zionist neocons orchestrated the annihilation of Iraq (36); who wouldn’t for a minute even contemplate mentioning the usurping Zionist entity as the culprit behind 9/11 and other shadowy false flags; who contemptibly depict those who reject the official, nonsensical story of the “Holocaust” as persons not even worthy of living let alone speaking with; who attack a brave soul like Dieudonné but who remained in the doldrums of abstruseness on the likes of Silverman and David after they insulted Jesus Christ; who tell us that they represent “freedom” but fail to mention that their definition of “freedom” is immensely different from our own. Their “freedom” is that of living under the “Jewish Utopia” after International Zionism has picked apart all of its enemies (37); our “freedom” is that of liberation, plain and simple.

Let these gatekeepers crumble first. And then, let the false kings sitting behind the gate who signed their paychecks and marveled at their collaborationist efforts crumble next. Never will the gutterisms of “the chosen” ever drown out the wit of the anti-Zionists, endless resources of the former be damned to the darkest, deepest, foulest depths of the wrong end of the afterlife. Give ‘em all hell. Or even better, in the spirit of brother Dieudonné, give ‘em a quenelle.


(1) The Zionist Infestation Of Africa: Zimbabwe To Uganda, Congo To Somalia And Beyond by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask Of Zion

(2) British Have Invaded Nine Out Of Ten Countries  – So Look Out Luxembourg by Jasper Copping, The Telegraph

(3) The Disraeli Saga by Shifra Horn, Haaretz

(4) Despite Abbas And Balfour, We Will Return To Our Homes In Palestine by Shahd Abusalama, The Electronic Intifada

(5) How Zionist Terrorism Became British Spies’ Biggest Enemy by Calder Walton, Foreign Policy

(6) Fury As Dalyell Attacks Blair’s ‘Jewish Cabal’ by Colin Brown and Christ Hastings, The Telegraph

(7) Michael Levy: Lord Cashpoint by Paul Vallely, The Independent

(8) Mandelson On Judaism, Lord Levy And His JC Dad by Jenni Frazer, The Jewish Chronicle

(9) Gordon Brown Visits Jerusalem Holocaust Memorial Yad Vashem On Israel by Melissa Kite, The Telegraph

(10) Brown: U.K. A True Friend Of Israel, Will Work Toward Terror-Free Future by Haaretz

(11) Some People Never Learn The Lesson by Gilad Atzmon, The Truth Seeker

(12) All In The Family: David Cameron’s Jewish Roots And The Coreligionists Who Brought Him To Power by Martin Iqbal, Empire Strikes Black

(13) Don’t Laugh! It’s “Anti-Semitic”! – International Zionism’s Crusade Against Dieudonné and The Global Jewish Assault On Freedom of Speech by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(14) The Quenelle: Blame Dr Strangelove And The Bomb by Stuart Littlewood, Dissident Voice

(15) Sarah Silverman’s UK Debut Was No Laughing Matter by Ed Stafford, The Guardian

(16) My Breakfast With Larry David by Peter Rosengard, The Jewish Chronicle

(17) Seeing Shlock: Jewish Humour And Visual Art by Judy Batalion, Jewish Quarterly

(18) Larry David Blasted For ‘Curb’ Episode Where He Urinates On Jesus Painting by Fox News

(19) Curb Your Racism by Eleanor Kilroy, Mondoweiss

(20) Blind Imperial Arrogance by Edward Said, Los Angeles Times

(21) Billionaire Boychiks Battle For Media Empire by Nathaniel Popper, The Jewish Daily Forward

(22) Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon by Joel Stein, Los Angeles Times

(23) Op-Ed: Dieudonné: Anti-Semitism That Makes People Laugh by Giulio Meotti, Arutz Sheva

(24) Bowing To Jewish Pressure by Gilad Atzmon, Uprooted Palestinians

(25) UK Amends Law To Protect Israelis From Prosecution by Jonny Paul, The Jerusalem Post

(26) ‘Dirty Jews’ And The Christian Right by Josh Lambert, Haaretz

(27) Triple-Exthnics by Nathan Abrams, Jewish Quarterly

(28)  The Truth About the Talmud: A Documented Exposé of Supremacist Rabbinic Hate Literature by Michael A. Hoffman II, Independent History and Research

(29) Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight Of Three Thousand Years by Israel Shahak, Pluto Press

(30) Jesus In The Talmud by Peter Schäfer, Princeton University Press

(31) French Court Acquits Dieudonne Over Anti-Semitic Video by The Times Of Israel

(32) Remove Parts Of Quenelle Youtube Video, Dieudonne Ordered by Jewish Telegraph Agency

(33) The Hierarchy Of The Human Species As Told By Eli Ben Dahan by Uri Masgav, Haaretz

(34) When A Jew Gets 5/3 Of A Vote… by Philip Weiss, Mondoweiss

(35) Gatekeeping For Zion by Philip Giraldi,

(36) Jewish At The Root: Iraq’s Destruction, Hell Weapons, Hatred, Networking And The Interconnectedness Of It All by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

(37) PSYWAR: The Fake Fall Of Tripoli And The Zionist Dragon’s Butchery Across Palestine II by Jonathan Azaziah, Mask of Zion

Posted in ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Anti-Zionist Wit Vs. “Chosen” Gutterisms: Dieudonné and Imperialist Subservience To Jewish Supremacy

Pakistan: Gateway to the Zionist Endgame


By the Editor.

Updated December 20, 2011: expanded and clarified the section pertaining to the David Ben-Gurion quote.

Israel’s plan to eviscerate the Arab and Muslim states, eyes nuclear Pakistan as the final hurdle. In the wake of NATO’s deadly November 26 attack on Pakistan, the S.I.T.E. Intelligence Group rears its head to carry forward the Zionist deceptions.

In February 1982 an important Hebrew paper appeared in a Jewish journal named KIVUNIM (Directions). Penned by Oded Yinon and titled ‘A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties‘, the essay delineates strategies for Israel to become a regional hegemon in the Middle East. The short and long term strategies discussed involve the dissolution of the surrounding Arab states, and the expansion of Israel beyond its current (undeclared) borders. Over a decade later in 1996, a Zionist study group led by arch Jewish Zionist Richard Perle wrote a paper entitled ‘A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm‘. ‘A Clean Break‘ was largely a rehashing of Oded Yinon’s essay, adapting the same strategies to the contemporary geopolitical landscape of the Middle East.

The Mossad false flag attacks of September 11, 2011 ushered in the Zionist-designed ‘War on Terror’. Before the attacks had even concluded, before any conclusive proof of the perpetrators could possibly have been attained, a prominent architect of the attacks appeared(1)  on BBC World in order to name the states that had to be dissolved under Israel’s grand strategy (including Iraq, Libya, Syria and Iran). The U.S. Military was to be used as a mere tool, a ‘host body’ that would act as the American glove protecting the Israeli hand from the blood and treasure that would be spilled and spent. Since that time the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East and Central Asia has changed radically; we have seen the ‘Clean Break’ strategy unfold. In 2011 alone, Israel’s plan has lurched forward to engulf Libya and Syria. A major conflagration looms in the Middle East as Bashar Al-Assad faces a concerted destabilisation attempt mounted by Israel, the U.S, Jordan, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

Oded Yinon’s plan is centred around the exploitation of ethnic, religious and tribal divisions within the Arab world. He notes that the Arab states have been largely defined by Britain and France, with arbitrary borders drawn that are not faithful to the ethnic, religious, and tribal differences between the different peoples in the region. Likening the Arab world to a house of cards, Yinon surmises that the entire region can be easily broken up into tiny states based on ethnic, religious, or tribal lines. This would preclude any centralised governance, and ensure that power is only localised to these ‘mini-states’. In effecting this strategy, Israel would remove any real opposition to its regional dominance.

Egypt, Libya & Sudan

A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties‘ makes clear Israel’s goal of balkanising (or ‘breaking up into smaller states’) Egypt and the surround states of Libya and Sudan:

Egypt, in its present domestic political picture, is already a corpse, all the more so if we take into account the growing Moslem-Christian rift. Breaking Egypt down territorially into distinct geographical regions is the political aim of Israel in the Nineteen Eighties on its Western front.

Egypt is divided and torn apart into many foci of authority. If Egypt falls apart, countries like Libya, Sudan or even the more distant states will not continue to exist in their present form and will join the downfall and dissolution of Egypt. The vision of a Christian Coptic State in Upper Egypt alongside a number of weak states with very localized power and without a centralized government as to date, is the key to a historical development which was only set back by the peace agreement but which seems inevitable in the long run.

The illegal war on Libya has already plunged the country into tribal conflict and chaos, signalling a new phase in Israel’s plan. Sudan, as we have seen very recently, has already been split into two distinct states: Sudan and South Sudan. In a piece(2) published by the Al-Khaleej Times, Fahmi Howeidi expertly lays out how Israel has brought about the balkanisation of Sudan by training and cultivating secessionist groups, and provoking internal wars since the nineteen fifties. As Howeidi succinctly writes, “the crop sown by Israel and its allies since the 1950s is beginning to bear fruit“.

Pertaining to Libya, Islamic scholar Sheikh Imran Hosein’s analysis is right on point. He theorises that the Libya war, waged by NATO, an extension of the Zionist entity, is a precursor to the balkanisation of Egypt. Hosein envisages a two-pronged attack on Egypt: NATO and its proxy land forces from the west, and Israel from the east.

Moving to Egypt’s eastern frontier, it is a well known fact that Israel covets the Sinai (the Egyptian peninsula east of the Nile River) for not only ideological reasons (the realisation of Greater Israel), but also economic ones. Yinon makes no secret of Israeli designs on the Sinai:

The loss of the Suez Canal oil fields, of the immense potential of the oil, gas and other natural resources in the Sinai peninsula which is geomorphologically identical to the rich oil-producing countries in the region, will result in an energy drain in the near future and will destroy our domestic economy: one quarter of our present GNP as well as one third of the budget is used for the purchase of oil. The search for raw materials in the Negev and on the coast will not, in the near future, serve to alter that state of affairs.

(Regaining) the Sinai peninsula with its present and potential resources is therefore a political priority which is obstructed by the Camp David and the peace agreements. The fault for that lies of course with the present Israeli government and the governments which paved the road to the policy of territorial compromise, the Alignment governments since 1967. The Egyptians will not need to keep the peace treaty after the return of the Sinai, and they will do all they can to return to the fold of the Arab world and to the USSR in order to gain support and military assistance. American aid is guaranteed only for a short while, for the terms of the peace and the weakening of the U.S. both at home and abroad will bring about a reduction in aid. Without oil and the income from it, with the present enormous expenditure, we will not be able to get through 1982 under the present conditions and we will have to act in order to return the situation to the status quo which existed in Sinai prior to Sadat’s visit and the mistaken peace agreement signed with him in March 1979.

This corroborates Hosein’s theory that an Israeli attack is impending on the Sinai, potentially in concert with NATO-aligned forces in Libya. Recent belligerent posturing(3) by an Israeli Member of the Knesset further backs up this idea.

Syria & Iraq

Two other nations earmarked for destruction at the outset of the Zionist ‘War on Terror’ were Syria and Iraq. As Yinon’s paper demonstrates, these nations too are prime targets of Israel’s balkanisation plan.

The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.

Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel’s targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi’ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north.

Not only is Syria now undergoing the major Zionist destabilisation plot prescribed in Yinon’s strategy, but this plot is being carried out on the ground with major Turkish military, operational, and territorial support. This is something that was recommended in Richard Perle’s ‘Clean Break’ rehashing of the strategy:

(Israel can) Work closely with Turkey and Jordan to contain, destabilize, and roll-back some of its most dangerous threats. This implies clean break from the slogan, “comprehensive peace” to a traditional concept of strategy based on balance of power.

Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.

Most important, it is understandable that Israel has an interest supporting diplomatically, militarily and operationally Turkey’s and Jordan’s actions against Syria, such as securing tribal alliances with Arab tribes that cross into Syrian territory and are hostile to the Syrian ruling elite.

Readers will most likely be aware of General Wesley Clark’s ‘seven nations in five years’ testimony. Clark, a four star General in the United States Army stated that on September 12, 2001 – the day after Israel’s false flag – the United States had already made the decision to wage war on Iraq in spite of having no casus belli whatsoever. A few weeks after this, shortly after the start of the war on Afghanistan, Clark was shown a memo which named seven countries that the United States was to ‘take down’ in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. This is literally a laundry list of Israel’s targets; the ‘Israeli hand in the American glove’ metaphor becomes disconcertingly fitting and relevant:

Jordan & the Palestinians

A Strategy for the Nineteen Eighties‘ recommends a ‘final solution’ to Israel’s ‘Palestinian problem’. After ethnically cleansing Palestinians from their land in 1948, Israel was unable to uproot the indigenous Arabs from the portion of Palestine that is now known as the West Bank. Though Israel occupied it in 1967, they were unable to force the entire population into flight.

Yinon’s plan calls for the native Palestinians of the West Bank to be pushed east over the river into Jordan, where they may establish a state. This, without compromise, is the only solution the Israeli colonists will accept – something which is evidenced by Israel’s continued and accelerated Jewish colonisation of the West Bank.

There is no chance that Jordan will continue to exist in its present structure for a long time, and Israel’s policy, both in war and in peace, ought to be directed at the liquidation of Jordan under the present regime and the transfer of power to the Palestinian majority. Changing the regime east of the river will also cause the termination of the problem of the territories densely populated with Arabs west of the Jordan. Whether in war or under conditions of peace, emigration from the territories and economic demographic freeze in them, are the guarantees for the coming change on both banks of the river, and we ought to be active in order to accelerate this process in the nearest future. The autonomy plan ought also to be rejected, as well as any compromise or division of the territories for, given the plans of the PLO and those of the Israeli Arabs themselves, the Shefa’amr plan of September 1980, it is not possible to go on living in this country in the present situation without separating the two nations, the Arabs to Jordan and the Jews to the areas west of the river. Genuine coexistence and peace will reign over the land only when the Arabs understand that without Jewish rule between the Jordan and the sea they will have neither existence nor security. A nation of their own and security will be theirs only in Jordan.

Within Israel the distinction between the areas of ’67 and the territories beyond them, those of ’48, has always been meaningless for Arabs and nowadays no longer has any significance for us. The problem should be seen in its entirety without any divisions as of ’67. It should be clear, under any future political situation or military constellation, that the solution of the problem of the indigenous Arabs will come only when they recognize the existence of Israel in secure borders up to the Jordan river and beyond it,

The Atlantic boasts of a new Middle East

A 2008 Atlantic article by Jewish Zionist Jeffrey Goldberg contained a very telling map of a possible future Middle East. Readers may recall that it was Jeffrey Goldberg who said in 2002(4) that Saddam Hussein “could have an atomic bomb within months of acquiring fissile material”, and that the genocidal war on Iraq would be “remembered as an act of profound morality”.

The map makes for very interesting viewing; it is literally a visual representation of the Israeli plan to remake the Middle East and North Africa. On the Horn of Africa we see Somalia split into three states, and Sudan broken into two (something which has actually happened since 2008). Eritrea is occupied by Ethiopia, signified by the striped colour-coding on the map, and the Egyptian Sinai is given the same treatment, presumably indicating an Israeli occupation.

Palestine is merged into Jordan, in line with the plan to push the Palestinians out of the West Bank and into a state on Jordanian territory.

Iraq has been balkanised with the creation of a Shia state, a Sunni state, and a Kurdish state in the north. This outcome is being avidly worked towards by Mossad and elite elements of the Israeli military, who have been fomenting Shia-Sunni sectarian conflict in Iraq for years.(5) As a result, since the 2003 invasion the U.S. Military has constructed hundreds of miles of concrete walls in Iraqi cities, to separate the Sunni and the Shia from one another. Though most of these walls have since been torn down, their very presence is a manifestation of the Israeli plan to split Iraq on sectarian lines, “So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi’ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north.

Pakistan: Gateway to the Zionist Endgame

In a widely circulated quote reportedly published in the ‘Jewish Chronicle’ on August 9, 1967, the first Prime Minister of Israel, David Ben-Gurion, elucidated Israeli opposition to Pakistan.

Zionist bloggers have attempted to debunk this quote as bogus by presuming that the ‘Jewish Chronicle’ in question is the London-based paper. Debunkers’ arguments centre around the fact that the London JC archive does not contain this quote and in fact the London JC did not publish on August 9, 1967. This quote is difficult to verify due to the sheer number of ‘Jewish Chronicle’ newspapers that have existed, and which do not have websites or online archives at this time.

I will demonstrate that this quote is in line with historical and current Israeli strategy, as well as the rhetoric that is now peddled by Israeli officials and lobbyists. Because of this, it is this writer’s opinion at the current time that this quote is authentic.

A matter of weeks after Israel’s conquest of the West Bank, Al Quds (Jerusalem), Gaza, and Syria’s Golan Heights – Ben-Gurion reportedly made Zionism’s staunch opposition to Pakistan crystal-clear:

The world Zionist movement should not be neglectful of the dangers of Pakistan to it. And Pakistan now should be its first target, for this ideological State is a threat to our existence. And Pakistan, the whole of it, hates the Jews and loves the Arabs.

This lover of the Arabs is more dangerous to us than the Arabs themselves. For that matter, it is most essential for the world Zionism that it should now take immediate steps against Pakistan.

Whereas the inhabitants of the Indian peninsula are Hindus whose hearts have been full of hatred towards Muslims, therefore, India is the most important base for us to work there from against Pakistan.

It is essential that we exploit this base and strike and crush Pakistanis, enemies of Jews and Zionism, by all disguised and secret plans.

Relatively recent comments from Israel’s repugnant, racist Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman corroborate this position, revealing that this Zionist strategy exists as a priority in the modern day. In a 2009 interview with a Russian daily newspaper, Soviet-born Lieberman (born Evet Lvovich Liberman) revealed(6) that he saw Pakistan as Israel’s biggest threat, as opposed to Iran which is commonly painted as Israel’s arch nemesis:

“Pakistan is nuclear and unstable and Afghanistan is faced with a potential Taliban takeover, and the combination forms a contiguous area of radicalism ruled in the spirit of Osama bin Laden,”

In the same interview Lieberman professed, “Believe me, America accepts all our decisions”, an arrogant but nevertheless valid analysis.

On September 11, 2008, former chief AIPAC lobbyist Douglas M. Bloomfield wrote a panicked tirade against Pakistan,(7) insisting that the incoming U.S. President must focus on the country. Bloomfield’s article repeats all of the standard Zionist rhetoric, including the complaint that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are at risk of ‘falling into the wrong hands’.

Briefly returning to the ‘Atlantic’ map, you will notice that Afghanistan has been disembowelled; the ethnic states of Baluchistan and Pashtunistan have been created, and the northern region of Afghanistan has been absorbed into ‘Persia’. As a result of the secession of Baluchistan and Pashtunistan (both of which straddle the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, while Baluch territory extends into Iran too), significant chunks of Pakistan have been lost. This is part of a long-standing Zionist policy to cripple Pakistan as a nation.

Pakistan is a proud Muslim nation which not only has an ideological opposition to Zionism and Western colonialism, but possesses nuclear weapons. The nuclear deterrent, partnered with a cohesive and loyal army and air force presents a significant roadblock to Zionist and Indian aspirations of hegemony.

Shahid Siddiqi of muses(8) that,

“Due to its defiance of Indian diktat, Pakistan is for India an obstruction in its quest for domination of South Asia and the Indian Ocean region. Israel`s apprehension of Pakistan’s military prowess is rooted in the strength Pakistan indirectly provides to Arab states with whom Israel has remained in a state of conflict. Conscious that several Arab states look up to Pakistan for military support in the event of threat to their security from Israel, it is unsettling for Israel to see a nuclear armed Pakistan.

Again, this analysis gives a nod to David Ben-Gurion’s position on Pakistan – echoed by Israel’s Foreign Minister over forty years later. Israel’s deep military-intelligence collaboration with India(9) is yet another indication of this strategy manifesting.

This strategy was transposed into an overt act of war when in 1984, Israel attempted to destroy Pakistan’s Kahuta nuclear reactor. After becoming aware of the plot, Pakistan spurned the attack by pre-emptively scrambling jets to protect the facility. To this day the strategy continues by overt and covert means.

In the midst of the Zionist ‘War on Terror’ in June 2004, George W. Bush began drone attacks on Pakistan. The deadly attacks, ostensibly launched against ‘Al Qaeda’ and Taliban ‘terrorists’ and ‘insurgents’, accelerated in regularity and intensity from 2004 to 2011 – killing thousands of innocent Pakistanis. The real underlying motive for these attacks is to foment unrest in these regions, with a view to provoking and cultivating militant secessionist groups. The aim is to turn these groups against the collaborationist Pakistani government (which is impotent in the face of naked aggression on the part of its American ‘ally’).

The balkanisation of Pakistan and seizure of its nuclear weapons are the ultimate aspirations of Israel as well as the United States, which aims to preserve its declining superpower status in the face of a growing China. A prominent meme in the Zionist media is the notion that Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are unsafe and at risk of ‘falling into the wrong hands’. This is the very justification that will eventually be used to launch an all-out invasion of Pakistan whereby Western powers will seize its nuclear weapons. The drone strikes, NATO provocations, and CIA-Mossad-RAW black ops serve to fan the flames of unrest, creating the necessary climate for military action and eventual dismemberment of Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran. The close relationship between China and Pakistan is a significant factor in the drive to break up Pakistan. China’s port at Gwadar is known as one of her ‘String of Pearls’, being of huge strategic interest and allowing for an energy corridor through Pakistan.

The latest chapter in the war on Pakistan transpired on Saturday 26 November when NATO helicopter gunships slaughtered 24 Pakistani soldiers.(10) In a naked act of aggression, NATO helicopters attacked a Pakistani army post for 45 minutes, then returned 20 minutes later and attacked for a further hour. Predictably this has triggered furious protests in Pakistan, and intense anger at both NATO and the Pakistani military, criticised for not responding to protect the soldiers during the two-hour attack. In the final analysis however, this event has unified the Pakistani people.

After NATO’s inexcusable attack on Pakistan the Zionist deceptions immediately followed, in a stunningly predictable development.

On Saturday 13 August, 2011 – over three months prior to the recent NATO attack – an American Jewish man named Warren Weinstein, working under the auspices of the U.S. government, was reportedly kidnapped by armed men in the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore. Suspiciously, five days after the NATO attack, the S.I.T.E. Intelligence Group informs the world that ‘Al Qaeda’ have claimed in an audio message to be holding Weinstein. In a profoundly shaky statement a U.S. official was quoted(11) as saying, “It’s entirely possible that al Qaeda or one of its militant allies may be holding Mr. Weinstein, and the statement by Zawahiri supports this conclusion”.

Why would ‘Al Qaeda’ wait over three months to tell us?

Is it not convenient that, in S.I.T.E’s audio message, ‘Zawahiri’ also called for the lifting of the siege on Gaza?(12) Israel has consistently tried to link the global ‘Free Gaza’ struggle to ‘Al Qaeda’. This has been the Zionist entity’s modus operandi ever since the Mavi Marmara was brutally attacked, whereafter Israel claimed the activists were linked to ‘Al Qaeda’.(13)

Why are these ‘Al Qaeda’ audio messages invariably posted on ‘extremist websites’ that no independent person has access to and therefore can never be independently verified? Why is every such ‘Al Qaeda’ tape, without exception, found by S.I.T.E? This bizarre situation becomes clearer when we examine the S.I.T.E. Intelligence Group. Founded in 2002 at the outset of the ‘War on Terror’ by rabid Zionist and former IDF soldier Rita Katz (whose father was hanged in Baghdad for spying for Israel), S.I.T.E. is nothing more than the PR organ of the ‘War on Terror’. It exists to convince the world that the ‘Al Qaeda’ apparition is an eminent threat whenever and wherever it is required.

The invasion of Afghanistan was waged in the name of a number of important interests. It was an attempt to militarise Central Asia in order to counter the growing power of China, Iran, and Russia. It was meant to facilitate the construction of an energy pipeline to transport the rich energy reserves of the Caspian basin through Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, southern Pakistan, and from there to Western markets. However, even more importantly the occupation of Afghanistan serves as a precursor to the war on Pakistan. It allows Western forces to learn the territory and develop the necessary tactics. It allows them to become familiar with local groups who can be armed, trained, and used as proxy armies as we’ve seen in the Libya war.

When we read of drone strikes against ‘militants’ and alleged ‘Al Qaeda’ kidnappings in Pakistan, we must view them through an analytical lens; nothing is ever as it seems in this geopolitical hotspot. While kvetching that Pakistani nukes are unsafe and a threat to peace, Israel, the United States, and India are actively working to violently destabilise the country.

The ‘War on Terror’ is an utterly false paradigm shored up by the sea of deception put forth by the Zionist media and groups such as S.I.T.E. We must strip away this veneer to expose the motivations and strategies of the Zionist entity and its American lapdog – the nations which constitute the biggest threat to peace on the face of the planet.


(1) ‘September 11, 2001: Zionist shock therapy and the birth of the lie’ by Martin Iqbal
(2) ‘Israelis can tell the whole story of Sudan’s division – they wrote the script and trained the actors’ by Fahmi Howeidi
(3) ‘MK: Prepare for War If Egypt Deploys in Sinai’ – Israel National News
(4) ‘Should the U.S. Invade Iraq? Week 2’ – Slate Magazine
(5) ‘Occupied Iraq: New Year, Same Zionism’ by Jonathan Azaziah
(6) ‘Israeli FM sees Pakistan biggest threat’ –
(7) ‘Iran is bombastic, but Pakistan has the bomb’ – The Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle
(8) ‘How safe are Pakistan’s nuclear assets’ –
(9) ‘Israel and India: Brothers In Occupation of Kashmir’ by Jonathan Azaziah
(10) ‘Pakistan army says NATO attack was blatant aggression’ – Reuters
(11) ‘Al Qaeda Leader Zawahiri Says He Has American Hostage’ – ABC News
(12) ‘Al-Qaida: Israel must lift Gaza ‘siege’ in exchange for U.S. Jewish prisoner’ – Ha’aretz
(13) ‘Israeli Officials Claim Aid Flotilla Had Ties to Al Qaeda, PM Gives Military ‘Full Support” – Fox News

Posted in Middle East, ZIO-NAZIComments Off on Pakistan: Gateway to the Zionist Endgame




by Jonathan Azaziah

Disappointingly but expectedly, the vast majority of the analysts and pundits within the alternative media RIGHTLY criticized President Supercilious Orange’s illegal aggression against Syria but FAILED MISERABLY to analyze why he carried out this attack to begin with. And then there is the minority of analysts and pundits who have despicably suggested a theory of Trump-Putin-Assad collusion in the strike to get the Tangerine Terrorist’s domestic opposition off his back–an asinine suggestion if there ever was one considering this very same opposition, while gleefully welcoming the assault on Syrian sovereignty, are now clamoring that it “wasn’t enough” and “more must be done” in the name of “regime change”. They too have completely missed the 800-pound gorilla in the room demanding more than a pound of Gentile flesh with its bunches of bananas. That massive, bloodthirsty primate of course is the usurping Zionist entity. Was there ever really a doubt?

Indeed, the Tangerine Terrorist known as Donald Trump bombed Syria for the exact same reason that every previous US head of state has ever bombed any (and every) other country in the Arab-Islamic world: ‘Israel’. The evidence of this being the handiwork of Empire Judaica is both copious and blatant, which makes the misfiring of the aforementioned commentators so dubious.

While several Russian media outlets have been engaging in heavy counter-psy-ops in an attempt to keep up morale and downplay the damage done by the US ZOG’s assault, and the White House has ridiculously claimed that Trump’s rash and cowardly action wiped out more than 20% of Syria’s working fleet, the REAL target is being covered up: The lone air defense system at Shayrat Airbase that targets invading ‘Israeli’ warplanes and drones. Moreover, Shayrat is also used specifically by the Syrian Arab Air Force to target the usurping Zionist entity’s proxies in Homs and also to fly sorties against the Takfiri terrorist scourge targeting the Syrian Christians just north in Hama’s Mhardeh, whom ‘Israel’ has been seeking to eliminate via its proxies for several years now.

Syria’s defenders have been routinely shooting down ‘Israeli’ aircraft since last September and after the most recent incursion of the Jewish supremacist enemy this past March, which saw both a warplane and a drone being blasted out of the sky (by the SAA and Hizbullah respectively), the maniacal wingnut ‘Israeli’ Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman threatened to destroy ALL of Syria’s air defense systems. This however did not sit well with the Russian Federation, and as confirmed by both Syrian UN Ambassador Dr. Bashar al-Jaafari and Moscow, such a maneuver was not acceptable and general ‘Israeli’ violations of Syrian sovereignty for that matter were no longer going to be tolerated either.

Fear and panic began spreading across the artificial Jewish entity’s military-intelligence establishment. And to make matters worse for the ‘Israeli’ occupiers, Iraqi Islamic Resistance group Harakat Hizbullah al-Nujaba announced the formation of the Golan Liberation Brigade, sending shockwaves throughout “Tel Aviv”. This was the culmination of strategic Mouqawamist designs that had been in the making for over a decade, the godfather of which being none other than martyred Hizbullah Commander Hajj Imad Mughniyeh (R.A.) ‘Israel’ has been assassinating Hizbullah officials (like Samir Quntar, Hajj Moustafa “Sayyed Zulfiqar” Badreddine and Hatem Hamada) and Syrian military leaders (like Republican Guard Commander Alaa Tayseer Nassif) ever since the Zio-Imperialist-manufactured “revolution” was unleashed but these aggression did not stop the front in Al-Jaulan from being opened up. ‘Israeli’ media outlets, think tank wonks and Knesset members were howling, day and night, like lycans at peak transformation at the onset of a full moon that something needed to be done. But with Vladimir Putin standing with his Syrian ally and shunning Netanyahu, and the Syrian Arab Army gung-ho to shoot down invasive enemy aircraft, Zion needed to go back to basics to upset the liberationist applecart that had defiantly strolled into its Talmudic-Halakhic wheelhouse.

About two weeks prior to the chemical weapons false flag attack in Idleb’s Khan Sheikhoun on April 4th, 2017, IOF Chief of Staff, Dahiyeh Doctrine architect and scumbagel war criminal Gadi Eizenkot set the stage for this event but NOBODY WAS PAYING ATTENTION. He reiterated that Hizbullah is the ‘Israeli’ regime’s number one enemy and then bizarrely attempted to link the usurping Zionist entity’s routine attacks on Syria to an ongoing intelligence regime set up by IOF in which it monitors–GET THIS–ongoing chemical weapons usage in Syria by “both sides” of “the conflict”–despite the fact that Syria has given up its chemical arsenal and the OPCW as well as the US State Department confirmed it.

Eizenkot called it “the regular use of tactical chemical weapons in the fighting in Syria.” And then, just two days before the staged incident that triggered global outrage, ‘Israeli’ Channel 2 and Channel 10 broadcasted numerous hysterical reports, quoting “retired” IOF personnel, about Hizbullah–at Iran’s behest, with Iraq’s help and with Syrian oversight–building up a “terrorist infrastructure” so large in the Golan Heights that the Resistance could retake the whole region. How was this “imminent threat” to the Zionist serpent’s “right to exist” going to be dealt with, the generals openly and deviously wondered. Cue the international deception-maker and death squad known as Mossad, whose motto is “By way of deception, thou shalt wage war”, and its Turkish ally MIT.

Idleb, as is well-known, is occupied and controlled by Al-Qaeda’s branch in Syria Jabhat al-Nusra and powerful Turkish-backed, Al-Qaeda-aligned Ahrar al-Sham. It has been shamelessly admitted in both the ‘Israeli’ press and Zionist think tanks that the usurping Jewish entity maintains an alliance with Nusra and this is reflected by the fact that the Takfiri terrorist gang has received weapons, money and logistics from Mossad as well as Aman and IOF, not to mention top-notch medical treatment in ‘Israeli’ military hospitals and routine aerial support from the ‘Israeli’ Occupation Air Force which bombs SAA positions to pave the way for Nusra’s advancement. Turkey’s relationship with Nusra along with Ahrar al-Sham is within the same vein. In other words: ‘Israel’ and Turkey run the show in Idleb. “Tel Aviv” and Ankara gave an order to their proxies to implement a chemical weapons protocol, as the latter have implemented all other destabilization conventions, including the chemical weapons false flag attack of ’13, and as it was said, then it was done.

Barely moments after the manipulated images of “gas victims” and accusations against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad hit newspaper front pages and TV screens across the world, courtesy of the Jewish-Zionist mainstream media, ‘Israeli’ Prime Minister (and war criminal) Benjamin Netanyahu and ‘Israeli’ President (and war criminal) Reuven Rivlin took to Twitter to express “shock” and “outrage” and “horror”. It was all eerily reminiscent of ‘Israeli’ terrorist chieftain Ehud Barak appearing on BBC just a few minutes after the Twin Towers came down and demanding the liquidation of Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Afghanistan. Further proof of the Zionist hand in this massive fraud surfaced with the presence of the ever-treacherous White Helmets. Not only are they funded by the US and UK ZOGs, they’re also bankrolled by George Soros, the billionaire “regime change” internationalist Jew and Rothschild lieutenant who donates tens of millions yearly to numerous Zionist institutions including (but not limited to) Chabad, J-Street and the United Jewish Appeal.

And the madness didn’t stop there. The aforementioned psychopath Avigdor Lieberman stated less than 24 hours after the (staged) carnage in Idleb that ‘Israel’ is “100% certain” of the Syrian government being behind the attack. Other influential ‘Israeli’ MoD stalwarts like Moshe Ya’alon and Amos Yadlin–who just several weeks earlier advocated in a YNet op-ed that ‘Israel’ should be manipulating both the US and Russia into keeping Iran out of the Golan Heights (and Syria as a whole)–also went on the record to falsely blame President Assad, spread lies that Syria had restocked its sarin gas arsenal and call for international military action to “punish the regime”.

Then the American regime, as it is attached at the hip with the ‘Israeli’ enemy, followed Lieberman, Ya’alon and Yadlin’s lead and using their “intelligence”, launched some 59 tomahawk cruise missiles at the already-discussed airbase in Homs, destroying the aforesaid Anti-Zionist air defense system and killing half a dozen Syrian soldiers, including high-ranking officers, as well as 9 civilians, among them children. Contrary to what many Trump apologists have said, Shayrat was NOT empty and the martyrs’ mutilated bodies put them to shame. And for the record, the comment about the US ZOG being attached at the hip with ‘Israel’ is not tongue-in-cheek but literal. The Zionist cancer was notified before the attack and immediately following its execution, Netanyahu used the occasion to call for further war on Syria, Iran and the DPRK.

Confirming that this act of ‘Israeli’-directed aggression was indeed ALL ABOUT THE OCCUPIED GOLAN HEIGHTS, not even 24 hours after Syria was hit, Netanyahu kept his mouth running and said in no uncertain terms that Syria’s “civil war” cannot be ended until ‘Israel’ gets the establishment of “buffer zones” on the Syrian border with occupied Palestine and Jordan–all to neutralize the Iranian, Iraqi and Hizbullahi presence in Al-Jaulan. Occupation media ramped up the hasbara too. Ben Caspit, arguably the usurping Zionist trash bucket’s most widely-read columnist and a well-known conduit for Mossad-Aman-IOF-Shin-Bet propaganda, published an absolutely bonkers story called “Following gas attack, ‘Israel’ reassesses Syrian threat”, which baselessly, dangerously and ridiculously suggests that Syria is transferring nerve gas projectiles to Hizbullah.

And just in case there was any doubt what the Syrian government thinks about this whole affair, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Mouallem outright declared that the main beneficiary for the gas attack allegations is indeed the ‘Israeli’ enemy. So what REALLY happened in Khan Sheikhoun then? The Syrian Arab Air Force bombed a chlorine factory where Takfiri terrorists were producing chemical bombs and then shipping them to their brethren in Iraq via Turkey. Afterwards, the Zio-Qaeda White Helmets staged the scene and cleaned up the their dead terrorist friends to look like civilians–something they have done frequently and with extreme malice since they popped on the scene not too long ago. This is the true narrative, certified with evidence from both Syria and the Russian Ministry of Defense, unlike the fake, evidence-less narrative presented by Western ZOGs. Verily, everything else is Jewish-controlled mainstream media noise.

The icing on the cake is that the driving force in the Trump administration to bomb Syria, risk global nuclear conflict and break President Supercilious Orange’s promise to the American people to stay the hell out of anymore foreign wars is none other than his son-in-law, Zionist Jew Jared Kushner. Even among Trump’s most hardcore loyalists, Kushner has always been seen as problematic at best and a mole for World Jewry (the more accurate assessment) at worst. A “Fire Kushner” hashtag has picked up steam since the strike on Syria and Kushner’s hideous impromptu visit to Iraq, where he pranced around with American occupation commanders by day and plotted with Zionist-linked Kurdish political groups at night. Kushner, whose family is close to Netanyahu and funds every Jewish-Zionist charity under the sun, does not operate on behalf of the Oval Office, nor the people of the United States, nor in the interests of America (imperially speaking or otherwise); he works for Global Zionism. And this is the pattern now plaguing Trump. More and more for the warmongering “chosenites”. Less and less for war-weary Americans.

Even if Trump did not follow the path set in front of him by the likes of Kushner, Ya’alon, Yadlin, Lieberman, Netanyahu and various other malevolent vampires lurking around him with this particular action, he STILL has been bombing Raqqa just about everyday and murdering civilians in their dozens, not to mention obliterating vital Syrian infrastructure–just like his predecessor. And Trump’s STILL been vastly increasing heavy military support to Kurdish gangs in northern Syria as a means of moving forth with the Oded Yinon-originated balkanization agenda.

Digging deeper, we have Sheldon Adelson, the ultra-Zionist globe-holder gazillionaire who Trump traded barbs with in the run-up to the election, giving the Donald a much-needed cash infusion of $25-$50 million towards the end of the campaign cycle and subsequently becoming a member of Trump’s inaugural team where even more mega-shekels were pumped into the new regime. Paul Singer, hedge fund billionaire Yahoudling and anti-Argentina “regime change” vulture-hawk, who once stood firmly against Trump (or so it appeared), poured a cool million bucks into Trump’s inauguration committee and the two are now on the same page. Even the Zionist Koch brothers are on board with Supercilious Orange now. As I quipped once before: Judaic wink-and-noddery at its finest.

As the neocons and neoliberals stomp their feet and scream for more interventionism, as Haley says removing Assad is a US priority, as monstrous oil-baron Rex Tillerson arrogantly goes to Russia and says that Moscow can either stand with Assad, whose “rule is coming to an end”, or stand with the US, and as the Mouqawamah Axis now has to delay operations to liberate the Golan Heights so WW3 isn’t provoked, the usurping Zionist bacteria is getting exactly what it wants and its toxic, criminal existence gets to carry on a little bit further. The proofs are here. The proofs are clear. Turn off Chabadnik Murdoch’s Fox News. Stay away from Zion’s Breitbart. Run and RUN FAR from Judaic disinformation hellhole InfoWars. Open up your eyes and bear witness to what’s right in front of you.

The Tangerine Terrorist bombed Syria for ‘Israel’. He’s slaughtering Iraqis for ‘Israel’. He’s sanctioning and trying to topple Venezuela for ‘Israel’. He’s also sanctioning Russia and Iran for ‘Israel’. He’s backing the KRG and the PYD/YPG for ‘Israel’. With the sign-off on Montenegro’s application, he’s expanding NATO for ‘Israel’. He’s rattling the saber at the DPRK for ‘Israel’. And he’s unconditionally backing Saudi Arabia’s genocide in Yemen for ‘Israel’. If the man didn’t start off as ZOG (he did), he damn sure is ZOG now (for sure). To use a typical quote from Supercilious Orange himself, “It’s bad. Very bad. It’s so bad, I just can’t even tell you how bad it is.” And it’s getting worse by the minute. Just like the Bush and Obama regimes were fought and exposed, it’s now time to do the same with the Trump regime. Save the excuses. Nothing less than mankind’s very future hinges upon such resistance.


Whom the gods would destroy


Image result for Whom the gods would destroy CARTOON

“Those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.”  This is an ancient saying credited to Euripides, the Greek dramatist who lived in the fifth century BC.

CNN said Trump became president when he ordered missile attacks on Syria – Bush became president when he attacked Afghanistan, Thatcher became prime minister when she sank the Belgrano… Do we see a pattern here?

Leaders gain “credibility” from acts of aggression but they are merely elevated cattle following orders.

We don’t need leaders, we need to take responsibility for ourselves and the world.

Posted in USA, SyriaComments Off on Whom the gods would destroy

The Case of WMDs: Who Used Chemical Weapons in Syria?


Image result for Chemical Weapons in Syria CARTOON

By Sajjad Shaukat

Suddenly tension has intensified between Russia and the US with the order of the American

President Donald Trump, when in the early hours of April 7, this year, using the pretext of

chemical weapons attacks and blaming the Assad regime, the US warships fired 60 cruise

missiles at the Shayrat Airfield controlled by the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces. This

was supposedly in response to the deadly chemical weapons attack which killed at least 100

people and injured 400 individuals on April 4, 2017 in Khan Sheikhoun town, located in Syria’s

northwestern province of Idlib, controlled by a rebel alliance which also includes a former Al-

Qaeda affiliate.


Regarding military action through strikes, President Trump said that it was a necessary response

to an “affront to humanity” after more than 70 people died in a poison gas attack in northwest

Syria. He also stated that he took the action because of a “vital national security interest of the

United States to prevent and deter the spread and use of deadly chemical weapons.” But such an

action has put both the nuclear powers US and Russia into a risky stand-off.


Here contradictions of the President need attention. President Barack Obama had drawn a

famous “red line” in Syria in 2012, warning Assad against the alleged use of chemical weapons.

His failure to take military action after Syria launched an alleged chemical attack in the summer

of 2013 marked one of his greatest foreign policy failures and became a symbol of presidential

equivocation and weakness. Trump was not among those criticizing Obama at the time. Instead,

he warned Obama not to take military action, even when chemical weapons had been used.

Similarly, when President Obama hosted the fourth Nuclear Security Summit in Washington on

March 31, 2016 to check the spread of nuclear weapons, showing concerns about the ambitions

of terrorist groups such as the Islamic State group (Daesh, ISIS, ISIL) in acquiring a nuclear

weapon or radioactive material, Donald Trump had taken a different stand in his interview with

the CNN by stating, “More nuclear weapons could make the world safer…US can no longer

afford to bankroll the defense of its allies in Europe, Asia and the Middle East…Japan, South

Korea and Saudi Arabia may need arsenals to confront threats in their region on their own.”

However, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem has categorically dismissed any accusations

that the Syrian Army deployed and used chemical weapons in Idlib. He elaborated, “An impartial

investigation into the Khan Sheikhoun incident should be conducted on the ground and be

controlled by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)…we are

against a remote investigation that would be conducted by collecting information provided by the

so-called ‘white helmets’ who have discredited themselves by producing staged videos for

achieving political goals.”


The Russian diplomat stressed, “We are also against using reports by the London-based Syrian

Observatory for Human Rights to make any accusations.”

Both Russia and Syria condemned aerial strikes in Syria as violation of the international law and

the UN charter.

In response to American airstrikes, Russia suspended a cooperation pact with the US aimed at

avoiding incidents between the two countries’ planes in the crowded airspace over Syria by

establishing direct hotlines between their militaries. Russian Foreign Ministry said, “The

chemical attack was used as pretext for a demonstration of force.”


Russia’s defense ministry has blamed the rebels, saying a Syrian airstrike hit a chemical

stockpile controlled by the armed opposition—Syrian jets are conducting legitimate strikes had

struck a rebel weapons facility, while the US strikes are illegitimate. The Kremlin pointed out in

a statement on April 7, 2017 that Syrian government doesn’t have any chemical weapons

stored—the “campaign” was revenge for military gains by the Assad regime and aimed to

“justify hostile resolutions it expects to be adopted at the Brussels conference.”

In a telephonic conversation, Russian President Vladimir Putin told the Israeli Prime Minister

Netanyahu that it was unacceptable to make groundless accusations regarding the chemical

weapons incident in Syria without conducting a detailed and unbiased investigation.

Meanwhile, the UN’s special envoy to Syria stated that an emergency Security Council meeting

has been called, while investigations continue into what appeared to be a “chemical attack from

the air.”


Some online sources also confirmed that the “armed terrorist groups” are responsible for the

attack of poisonous gases in Khan Sheikhoun.

At the United Nations, Russia’s deputy ambassador, Vladimir Safronkov, strongly criticized

what he called the US ‘‘flagrant violation of international law and an act of aggression’’ whose

‘‘consequences for regional and international security could be extremely serious.’’

On the other side, during an emergency session of the UN Security Council session, Nikki Haley,

the US ambassador to the UN said, ‘‘The world is waiting for Russia to reconsider its misplaced

alliance with Bashar al-Assad…the United States took a very measured step…we are prepared to

do more”.

It is notable that America and its allies such as UK, Germany, France etc. who are determined to

oust President Assad appreciated the US missile strikes. Some Muslim countries who support the

CIA-Mossad rebels groups and ISIS terrorists also welcomed the missiles attack, calling it a

courageous decision by Trump. Iran, which supports the other side of the six-year war,

condemned the strikes, describing unilateral action as dangerous.


Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the US attack and said that “In both

word and action, Trump sent a strong and clear message that the use and spread of chemical

weapons will not be tolerated.” Syrian rebel groups and ISIL outfit also appreciated America’s

aerial attack.


In fact, all these terror-entities and the US-led Western countries, including Israel were greatly

frustrated on the successes, achieved by the Russian-led forces which have retaken several

regions from the rebel groups and ISIS group in Syria and Iraq. As part of the double game of the

US and Israel, American CIA and Israeli Mossad have been supporting the rebel groups and ISIS

outfit. Russia has provided military assistance to the Syrian government since September 2015,

turning the balance of power in Assad’s favour. Moscow has used its veto power at the Security

Council on several occasions since the civil war began six years ago to prevent sanctions against

Damascus. Now, the US-led countries and Israel are manipulating the chemical attack of Khan

Sheikhoun town against the Assad regime and Russia.


As a matter of fact, the agents of Mossad who are in collaboration with the CIA sympathizers,

Syrian rebel groups and the ISIL militants arranged terror attacks in Paris, Brussels, Orlando,

San Bernardino, Nice, Munich, London, St. Petersburg and now in Stockholm. These were false

flag terror operations and were part of the secret strategy and dual game of America and

especially of Israel who are in connivance with each other in order to obtain the covert aims of

their countries against Russia and the Muslims. Mossad might be alone involved in these terror

assaults by using the ISIS terrorists who used the home-grown terrorists of these countries.

Hence, chemical weapons attack in Khan Sheikhoun town of Syria is also false flag terror assault

which was conducted particularly by Mossad in collaboration with the ISIS militants or the

Syrian rebels groups to reunite the US and Europe against the Assad regime, as a rift has been

created on a number of issues between the President Trump and America’s Western allies,

especially Europe.


In the recent past, Russian-led forces which re-occupied areas in Syria and Iraq, also recovered

huge quantity of weapons and explosives, including chemical weapons from the areas which

were in occupation of the rebels and ISIL.


Nevertheless, we need to analyze the case of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in order to

know who can use these fatal weapons in future, and to verify with past record of India and

Israel who used chemical weapons in Syria’s town of Khan Sheikhoun.

With the acceleration of the different war between the sovereign and non-sovereign entities,

dangers are looming that by availing the vicious phenomena of global terrorism, any entity can

use Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) inside the US and Europe or any Islamic or Western

country to obtain its selfish interests. In this respect, despite having collective aims, some

countries are also playing double game against one another.


Since the 9/11 tragedy, while waging phony global war on terror, the US-led Western high

officials and their media had been propagating in the world that Pakistan-based Islamic militants

can use WMDs or ‘dirty nuclear bombs’ inside the US and Europe. And a plot in this respect

would be prepared in Pakistan’s tribal areas. In this context, in connivance with Israeli secret

agency Mossad, Indian secret agency RAW intensified its propaganda campaign against

Pakistan. But, Islamabad took a temporary relief of sigh, because now, almost every plot

regarding terrorism is attributed to Syria where illegitimate interests of Israel are at risk.

It is noteworthy that Indian nuclear weapons and their related-material are unprotected, as

various cases of smuggling and theft have verified.


In July 1998, India’s Central Bureau of Investigation seized eight kg. of nuclear material from

Arun, an engineer in Chennai, including two other engineers. It was reported that the uranium

was stolen from an atomic research center. On November 7, 2000, the International Atomic

Energy Agency (IAEA) indicated that Indian police had seized 57 pounds of uranium and

arrested two men for illicit trafficking of radioactive material. IAEA said that Indian civil nuclear

facilities were vulnerable to thefts.


On January 26, 2003, CNN disclosed that Indian company, NEC Engineers Private Ltd. shipped

10 consignments to Iraq, containing highly sensitive equipment including titanium vessels and

centrifugal pumps. Indian investigators acknowledged that the company falsified customs

documents to get its shipments out of India. On June 12, 2004, Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation,

an American company was fined US $ 300,000 for exporting a nuclear component to the Bhaba

Atomic Research Center in India.


In December 2005, United States imposed sanctions on two Indian firms for selling missile

goods and chemical arms material to a Muslim country in violation of India’s commitment to

prevent proliferation. In the same year, Indian scientists, Dr. Surendar and Y S R Prasad had

been blacklisted by the US due to their involvement in nuclear theft. In December, 2006,

container packed with radioactive material had been stolen from an Indian fortified research

atomic facility near Mumbai.


However, in collaboration with the officials, proliferation of nuclear components and their

related-material has continued from time to time by the Indians.

Surprisingly, despite nuclear proliferation by India in violation of various international

agreements and its refusal to sign Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Comprehensive Test Ban

Treaty (CTBT) and Additional Protocol with the IAEA, Washington signed a pact of nuclear

civil technology with New Delhi.

As regards Israel, many authors, writers, officials, doctors, experts and reports have proved with

evidence that from the very beginning, Israel have not only stockpiled the WMDs, but used them

on various occasions.


Israeli military historian Urin Milstein and author Yeruham Cohen write, “In May 1948 the

Zionist gangs besieged the well-fortified Palestinian city of Acre…to enter the city, the Zionist

gangs injected typhoid in the aqueduct. Many Palestinians and some 55 British soldiers, who

were in the city, got infected…the ICRC delegate Mr. De Meuron, sent a series of

reports…describing the conditions of the city population as struck by a sudden typhoid

epidemic…the infection was water borne…the Zionist crimes did not stop then, but targeted

Egypt and Syria, using inhumane weapons.”


In his paper, published in the Non-Proliferation Review in autumn of 2001, Avner Cohen pointed

out, “Israel’s chemical weapon started with David Ben Gurion’s doctrine…the destruction of the

Palestinian society in Palestine…to accomplish this…Ben Gurion wrote a letter to Ehud Avriel;

a member in the Jewish Agency in Europe, ordering him to recruit European Jewish

scientists…experts in microbiology…were recruited to form the Science Corps in the Haganah

which later was called HEMED BEIT….publically known as Israel Institute for Biological

Research (IIBR)…was developing chemical and biological weapons in secret…when in 1992, El

Al Flight 1862 crashed….on its way to Tel Aviv…in Dutch history killing at least 47 and

destroying the health of 3000 Dutch residents….plane was carrying a shipment from Sokatronic

Chemicals of Morrisville, Pennsylvania to IIBR, under the US Department of Commerce license,

in violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)…140 biological weapon scientists

from the IIBR have strong links” with various related-research centers of the US and some

European countries.


During various phases of the Palestinian Intifada, Israel used these fatal weapons against the

unarmed Palestinians. In this regard, a number of investigative reports, after lab-verification,

have indicated severe convulsions, the burning sensation, the difficulty to breathe, the vomiting

and pain found in relation to the victims—mostly women and children.

In March 2003, BBC presented the documentary, investigating Tel Aviv’s development of

chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.


In 2006, during the war against Lebanon, Israel used banned chemical weapons like phosphorous

bombs in Lebanon and Gaza, which killed 286 Palestinians and injured 4,200.

In this context, an Italian television documentary programme (Channel, RAI News 24) have

revealed that in the 2006 war, Israel employed dense inert metal missiles, which are highly

carcinogenic. The documentary elaborated that the doctors observed, “Dozens of victims had

completely burned bodies and shrapnel type injuries that X-ray machines had been unable to


In this connection, American leading media suppressed the real details of the 2009 United

Nations (UN) fact-finding report which disclosed as to how Israel’s military used chemical

weapons against Palestinians.

In 2013, the US Secretary of State John Kerry accused Syrian President Bashar al-Assad of using

chemical weapons in relation to the Syrian civil war. In order to protect the interests of Israel, in

the pretext, America was determined to attack Syria like the invasion of Iraq where no weapons

of mass destructions were discovered. But, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned Western

powers against any airstrike. For face-saving, John Kerry withdrew from American stand, as he

could not prove it.


In fact, CIA-Mossad- supported rebels which have been fighting to oust President Assad’s

government had used chemical weapons in Syria. While, brushing aside the dangers, covertly,

America and its related-industries which are mostly under the control of Zionist Jews have

supplied Tel Aviv WMDs. Concealing these fatal weapons, Israel had flatly refused to sign the

NPT, and to ratify the CWC which obligates states to submit to international oversight and

destroy chemical agents in their possession. While in 2013, Damascus ratified the CWC. As

regards Israeli nuclear arsenal, it contains variety of atomic bombs. It also possesses small

nuclear weapons.

In 1983, the former Israeli prime minister, Ariel Sharon suggested India to join with Israel to

attack Pakistani nuclear facilities, and in 1982 he called for expanding Israel’s security influence

from Mauritania to Afghanistan.


Since 9/11, by availing that golden opportunity, both India and Israel have perennially been

manipulating the world phenomena of terrorism and anti-Muslim approach of the US-led West

so as to obtain their secret designs. Both Tel Aviv and New Delhi have been equating the ‘wars

of liberation’ in Palestine and Kashmir with terrorism, and under the cover, accelerated state

terrorism on these controlled territories. Their main purpose is to divert the attention of the west

from their own atrocities, while employing delaying tactics in the solution of these issues.

With the assistance of the American lobbies and in connivance with the US neoconservatives,

India and Israel have been exaggerating the threat of Islamophobia.


Nonetheless, Tel Aviv and New Delhi have been acting upon a secret diplomacy in targeting the

whole Islamic World in general and Pakistan, China, Iran, Libya and Syria in particular. In this

respect, by exploiting America’s ambivalent strategy and double standards of the US-led West,

both India and Israel have also been propagating that a ‘nuclearized’ Pakistan, having close ties

with China is sponsoring cross-border terrorism in Afghanistan and the Indian-occupied

Kashmir. And Iran and Syria are doing the same act in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Particularly, New Delhi considers Pakistan as its enemy number one. America and Israel are also

against Pakistan, as it is the only nuclear country in the Muslim world.


In this regard, similarity of interests has brought Israel and India to follow a common secret

strategy with the help of those Americans who are present in the US Administration.

In this context, Indian RAW, Israeli Mossad and some American CIA agents are in collusion

even at the cost of the US global and regional interests.


It is mentionable that ideology of Hindu nationalism prevails in every field at the cost of other

minority groups. It is even assisted by Indian defence forces clandestinely. This could be judged

from the incident, when on April 6, 2008 in a house of the fundamentalist outfit Bajrang Dal

invaded, a bomb went off. The investigation proved that the militants were found in bomb-

making. Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) of the Maharashtra arrested a serving Lt. Col. Srikant

Purohit along with other army officials, indicating that they were helping in training the Hindu

terrorists, providing them with the military-grade explosive RDX, used in terrorist attacks in

various Indian cities. ATS further disclosed that Lt. Col. Purohit confessed that in 2007, he was

involved in bombing of Samjhota express (Train between Pakistan and India in which a majority

of Pakistanis travel), which burnt alive 70 Pakistanis.


It is noteworthy that in one of his tapes, LT. Col Purohit said, “One of our own captain had

visited Israel”, and demanded “continuous supply of arms, training, an office with a saffron flag

in Tel Aviv, political asylum and support for our cause of a Hindu Nation in the UN.” The

Israelis, he added, gave “a very positive response.”


Regarding Hindu terrorism, Indian Home minister Sushil Kumar Shinde disclosed on January 20,

2013 that organised training camps run by the fundamentalist parties, RSS and BJP (Ruling party

of India) were promoting Hindu Terrorism. He also explained that these extremist parties were

behind the Samjhauta Express, Meccca Masjid and Malegaon blasts.

Since the leader of the ruling party BJP Narendra Modi became Prime Minister of India, various

developments like unprecedented rise of Hindu extremism, persecution of minorities, creation of

war-like situation with Pakistan etc. clearly show that encouraged by the fundamentalist rulers,

Hindu extremist parties such as BJP, RSS VHP, Bajrang Dal and Shiv Sena have been promoting

religious and ethnic chauvinism in India against the Muslims and Pakistan. Especially, assaults

on Christians and Muslims including their places of warships and property have been accelerated

by the fanatic Hindu mobs.

In these terms, an attack on the Uri military camp in Indian-held Kashmir, which was also a false

flag terror attack, managed by Indian RAW to distort Pakistan’s image and to divert attention

from the new Intifada of Kashmiris.


It is of particular attention that on January 7, 2015, two Islamic militants attacked the office of

French satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris, and killed 13 people on January 9,

2015. Two brothers namely Said and Cherif Kouachi suspected for the incident were killed in a

shootout with Police—in a hostage-taking situation. Thus, the gunmen killed total 17 persons.

Afterwards, Mossad connections with Charlie Hebdo incident had been exposed by many senior

analysts and social media bloggers, as the Zionist groups and Mossad used the episode to punish

France on recognizing Palestinian state and to desist other EU countries to avoid such approach

on Palestinians.

Similarly, on July 22, 2011, the twin terror-attacks in Oslo, Norway, killed 80 persons. The

Norwegian man Anders Behring Breivik, a right-wing fundamentalist Christian, who admitted

these attacks was obsessed with what he saw as the Muslim immigration—left behind a detailed

online manifesto, calling for a Christian war to defend Europe against the threat of Muslim



Kevin Barrett disclosed on October 14, 2015 through Veterans Today, “The official story claims

that Anders Breivik acted alone…but survivors of the massacre on Utoya Island, which

annihilated the anti-Zionist leadership of the youth wing of the Norwegian Labor Party, reported

there were multiple gunmen…as in dozens of other false flag terror operations. The purpose was

to punish Norway and its Labor Party for two policy breaches: Refusing to join NATO’s war on

Libya, and moving toward a full boycott of Israel.”

In his message, Breivik also favoured the ‘Hindu nationalism (Hindutva)—the anti-Muslim

movement of the Hindu fanatic parties.


Although these lethal poisons (WMDs) seem to be mysterious, yet still could be within the reach

of some Hindu terrorists with the help of RAW which could also get these destructive weapons

from Mossad. Such chemical and radiological materials could have also been smuggled inside

India by the Hindu fundamentalists with the covert backing of RAW.

Frustrated in isolating Islamabad, RAW in connivance with Mossad might have prepared a most

dangerous plan to use chemical, biological and nuclear weapons inside the US homeland or any

major European country to implicate Pakistan for having allegedly used these weapons through

some Taliban militants.


Particularly, RAW-Mossad may also employ these fatal weapons against NATO forces in

Afghanistan, as India and Israel want to prolong the stay of the US-led NATO troops in

Afghanistan which have become the center of their covert activities against Pakistan, China and

Iran. ISIS terrorists which are strategic assets of the CIA may be used by RAW and Mossad for

employment of these unconventional weapons. While, India, Israel and the US are also playing

double game against one another, hence, by utilizing the vicious circle of terrorism, New Delhi

can alone use these weapons through Afghanistan-based Tehreek-e- Taliban Pakistan (TTP) or

ISIS which has also been backed by India, and has claimed responsibility for several terror

assaults inside Pakistan, including the recent ones. RAW’s sole aim will be to provoke

Americans and its allies against Pakistan which is challenging Indian hegemony in the region.

Thus, Indian RAW could create a dangerous misunderstanding in which US could use small

nuclear weapons against Pakistan. Otherwise, Islamabad could be asked to rollback its atomic



In the post-terror attacks in Europe and America, by producing anti-Muslim phenomena like the

propaganda of the so-called threat of Islamophobia, persecution of the Muslims in the US,

Europe and in some other Western countries, Israel has succeeded in its sinister designs. Israeli-

led America also got the assistance of its Western allies (NATO) against Russia. As part of the

double game, American jet fighters and those of its Western coalition were targeting the ISIS

terrorists in Iraq and Syria. Now, Israel has also started airstrikes in Syria.

Most significantly, on January 17, last year, US-led Western countries’ sanctions against Tehran

have been officially lifted in accordance with the agreement, signed between six world powers

and Iran, whom Israeli prime minister had called a ‘historical blunder.’ In these circumstances,

Tel Aviv thought that perhaps America was playing double game with Israel. But, Trump again

imposed sanctions, while other Western countries did not follow the suit.

Besides other Western countries, a debate has started between the Zionists and non-Zionist Jews

for the two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian issue. Even, a majority of the Western

countries and their intellectuals have also been emphasizing upon the settlement of this dispute

through the two-state solution. Very soon, Tel Aviv will have no other option. Therefore, to

avoid the two-state solution of this old crisis, Mossad with the help of Zionist Jews and some of

its CIA sympathizers which might have supplied chemical weapons to the ISIS terrorists or the

rebel groups to use in Syria’s town of Khan Sheikhoun can also use them inside the US and

Europe or any major Western country with the aim of implicating Syria—and to cause a major

war (Or nuclear war) between Russia and the US-led NATO, while turning the world to clash of

civilizations, especially between the Muslims and the Christians.


Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants,
Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations
Courtesy Veterans Today

Posted in SyriaComments Off on The Case of WMDs: Who Used Chemical Weapons in Syria?

UN: Refugees traded in Libya ‘slave markets’


Image result for Libya ‘slave markets’ PHOTO

Press TV 

The United Nations has raised alarm over a climbing number of refugees passing through Libya who are being traded in so-called slave markets before being held for ransom and subjected to malnutrition and sexual abuse.

Migrants are typically traded for as little as $200 to $500, and are held for an average of two to three months, said the head of the UN migration agency’s Libya mission, Othman Belbeisi, in a Geneva press briefing on Tuesday.

He emphasized that “migrants are being sold in the market as a commodity,” cautioning that “selling human beings is becoming a trend among smugglers as the smuggling networks in Libya are becoming stronger and stronger.”

Many of the asylum seekers are used as day laborers in construction and agriculture, Belbeisi further stated, noting that although some are paid, others are forced to work without pay before being sold again to new buyers.

He also pointed to the extremely tragic fates that female refugees often encounter, saying, “About women, we heard a lot about bad treatment, rape and being forced into prostitution.”

According to a report released Tuesday by the agency, officially called the International Organization for Migration (IOM), its representatives have spoken to African refugees who recounted their experiences of being bought and sold in garages and parking lots in the southern Libyan city of Sabha, one of the nation’s main refugee smuggling hubs.

In the report, the IOM recounted the story of a Senegalese refugee – referred to as ‘SC’ to protect his identity — who spoke of being ‘bought’ and taken to his first ‘prison’ – a private home where more than 100 asylum seekers were beaten and held as hostages.

SC, the report added, was asked to pay 300,000 Central African Francs ($480) for his release, which he could not pay. He was then sold to another Libyan, who set his release price at 600,000 CFA ($970).

The Senegalese refugee further spoke of awful sanitary conditions and meals offered only once per day, adding that he was eventually able to get money from his family and work as an interpreter to avoid future beatings.

However, the IOM report added, others are not so lucky. Those who cannot pay are often killed or left to starve to death. They are buried without being identified.

“What we know is that migrants who fall into the hands of smugglers face systematic malnutrition, sexual abuse and even murder,” said IOM’s director of operations and emergencies, Mohammed Abdiker. “We are hearing about mass graves in the desert.”

The development came as Libya remains a major gateway for asylum seekers hoping to reach Europe via the Mediterranean Sea, with more than 450,000 people making the crossing over the past three years.

So far this year, of an estimated 26,886 refugees who have crossed into Italy, more than 600 are known to have drowned at sea while an unknown number perish during their journey north through the desert, according to press reports.

Posted in LibyaComments Off on UN: Refugees traded in Libya ‘slave markets’

Shoah’s pages