Follow

By: Sammi Ibrahem,Sr

Two sources close to the Saudi Zio-Wahhabi royal family revealed to the Associated Press the details of the kingdom’s authorities’ arrest of the two princes Ahmed bin Abdulaziz and Muhammad bin Nayef bin Abdul Aziz.

The two sources confirmed to the agency, yesterday, Saturday, that the two princes, who both previously headed the Ministry of the Interior, were arrested for their lack of loyalty to Mohammed bin Shalom, and one of the sources said that this step came due to “an accumulation of provocative incidents of behavior with regard to the leadership” by the two princes.

A source close to the royal court told the agency that the arrest of Prince Muhammad bin Nayef (60 years) was surprising, because he was subject to strict supervision since his release in mid-2017 from the position of Crown Prince, Minister of Interior and Chairman of the Political and Security Affairs Council, and the report drew that this Prince is known His relations with the American intelligence services that he was cooperating with in combating Al-Qaeda.

As for Prince Ahmed bin Abdulaziz, 78, the younger brother of King Shalom bin Abdulaziz, his imprisonment was also a surprise step for his prominent position in the royal family, although he is known for his opposing positions to the current crown prince, and he was among the few senior princes Those who refused to announce their loyalty to Prince Muhammad bin Shalom in 2017 and even publicly criticized the Kingdom’s policies in Yemen.

The Associated Press sources rejected the validity of the allegations that the two arrested princes were planning an attempted coup, and one of them said that the arrests were “a message calling on all members of the royal family, who feel they have been deprived of their rights, to stop complaining and abide by the rules.”

The source pointed out that this message is that if it is possible to arrest the brother of Prince Ahmed, then this means that it is possible to arrest any other prince without exception, adding that Prince Ahmed was considered a reliable person by members of the ruling family opposed to the crown prince’s control of Judgment.

The agency quoted a person familiar with the latest arrests as saying that Prince Ahmed had recently “complained” about the government’s decision to close the two holy mosques in order to prevent the spread of the new Corona virus in the territory of the Kingdom.

And the Saudi authorities have not yet issued any official comment on the press reports about the arrest of the two senior princes.

Follow

Chinese government spokesman Zhao Li Jian said Thursday that the US military may have brought the Corona virus to the Chinese city of Wuhan, which was hardest hit by the outbreak.

Zhao Li Jian posted a tweet in English on his Twitter account, saying, “When did the disease appear in the United States? 

How many people were injured? What are the hospital names? Perhaps the US military brought the epidemic to Wuhan … be transparent! Declare your information! America owes us an explanation. ”

Follow

By: Sammi Ibrahem,Sr

You may think that your hands are completely free of any germs and bacteria, but the hygiene you think you are achieving may not be sufficient.

What are the things that you should pay attention to every time you wash your hands?

Proper hand washing requires commitment to a group of key steps, and in turn, stops making common mistakes that make you more susceptible to disease.

Today, learn the principles of washing your hands by avoiding these mistakes, which were highlighted by Professor Pathology and Microbiology, Doctor Philip Tiarno, from «NYU Langone Health»:

Ignore soap

In fact, not using soap is a very common mistake. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, washing hands with soap and water is the best way to get rid of germs.

As for water only, it will reduce the bacteria to 23 percent, according to a study published in January 2011 in the “International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health”. While the researchers found that the use of soap will reduce the total bacteria to about 8 percent. It does not require putting water on the hands, but specifically removing particles.

• Not rubbing enough

Technically, hands should be washed for at least 20 seconds, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. To achieve this without getting bored, Happy Birthday can be sung twice during the process.

The length of hand washing affects the amount of bacteria that are disposed of. According to a study published in July 2012 in the “International Association for Food Protection”, washing your hands for 20 seconds will result in a further decrease in germs compared to washing for 5 seconds.

Forget about some parts of the hand

Although you use your fingers to hold objects or use a computer, it is also important to rub the back parts of the hands with soap and also between the fingers, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. An inch wash is required towards the wrist to ensure that as much bacteria as possible are removed. Also, the area under the nails should not be ignored as the germs can hide.

• Recontamination immediately after washing

If the handle of the sink in public places is not automatic, you should not turn it off once you have finished washing your hands, or you will expose your skin to the same germs that were present before washing. The same applies to the paper-based tissue machine if it is not automatic. The solution is very simple, and it requires closing the water handle and opening the bathroom door with a tissue instead of clean hands.

Reliance heavily on hand sanitizer

There is no doubt that a hand sanitizer that contains no less than 70 percent of alcohol is a good solution when soap and water are not available, but it should not be a permanent alternative to regular washing, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sterile hands do not get rid of all types of germs, and it may not be as effective if the hand is clearly dirty and greasy. On the other hand, using the sterilizer also has a protocol, so that it must be rubbed for at least 20 seconds and ensure that this includes between the fingers, under the nails, and the wrist.

When should hands be washed?

Dr. Tiarno stressed the need to wash hands after entering the bathroom, before preparing food and after it, before eating, and before contact with a sick person and after it, before and after changing the diaper, and before and after treating the wound, after coughing, sneezing, and cleaning the nose, and after touching an animal, feeding it, or disposing of its droppings And after touching the trash, after contacting common surfaces, as is the case with machines in the gym for example.

The aim of all this is to reduce the number of germs that are transmitted from the hands to the mouth, eyes or nose, which are the channels of entry into the body, thus causing the disease 80 percent of the time.

Follow

India is very much likely to buy an extra batch of Russian MiG-29 fighter jets, chief of Russia’s Federal Service for Military Technical Cooperation Dmitry Shugayev said on Monday.

“There is a high probability that we will have an additional order for MiG-29 fighter jets,” he said in an interview with the Rossiya-24 television channel.

India currently has more than 60 MiG-29 aircarft.

According to Shugayev, Russia has good chances to take part in India’s tender for the purchase of 110 fighter jets that is to be announced soon. It was reported earlier that the Russian side planned to take part in this tender with its MiG-35 fighter jets.

Follow

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.comT&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
https://www.ft.com/content/e1735d36-572e-11ea-a528-dd0f971febbc

The Big Read UK companies Add to myFT ‘Knowing the right people’: the embattled concierge with elite connections Quintessentially, whose founders include the Tories’ co-chair, has faced claims of mismanagement © FT montage / AFP / AP Share on Twitter (opens new window) Share on Facebook (opens new window) Share on LinkedIn (opens new window) Save Tabby Kinder and Daniel Thomas in London MARCH 3 2020Print this page231 An invitation to an event at No 10 Downing Street? Not a problem. A place at one of England’s most prestigious schools? Consider it done. The chance to mingle with Prince Harry at a Coldplay concert? Leave it to us. These are the sorts of services that Quintessentially, a London-based luxury concierge service, claims to have arranged for its well-heeled clients. Boasting powerful connections across British society, the company has marketed itself for two decades as a personal assistant to the 0.1 per cent. At the centre of the operation is the company’s 44-year-old co-founder, Ben Elliot, an old Etonian who moves effortlessly across a social circle that mixes the royal family, the Conservative party and the City of London. The nephew of Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, he is frequently photographed with her husband, Prince Charles, the future king. Mr Elliot is also a friend of influential politicians including Prime Minister Boris Johnson. That sort of access dovetails with the sales pitch from Quintessentially. The company advertises that it has secured clients a private dinner at Buckingham Palace hosted by Mr Elliot and invitations to events where customers might rub shoulders with political figures. Prince Charles is quoted in a promotional video for Quintessentially, praising its services. Quintessentially co-founder Ben Elliot, right, is the nephew of Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall and is often photographed with Prince Charles © Ben Stansall/AFP Mr Elliot’s networking skills have proved to be useful. Last July, he was made co-chair of the Conservative party where his list of contacts helped raise funds for Mr Johnson’s triumphant election campaign in December. He also has a growing presence in Whitehall. Mr Elliot was appointed in January 2019 as the government’s first “food waste tsar”, an unpaid role, to raise awareness about the issue. Quintessentially has also signed up the government’s Department for International Trade as a client of its door-opening services. But behind Mr Elliot’s high-profile web of relationships and society image, his company has confronted difficult questions. Quintessentially — which recorded losses in its last two sets of results — has faced allegations of financial mismanagement and has been accused of a macho, Mad Men-style working culture. Late last year Quintessentially paid millions of pounds to settle a lawsuit brought by two of its senior female executives, the Financial Times can reveal. The claim contained criticism of the management style of Mr Elliot and the company’s other two co-founders, Aaron Simpson and Paul Drummond. The High Court petition, seen by the FT, contained accusations that Mr Elliot, who once described himself as a “relentless, bossy fucker”, and his co-founders created a hostile environment for the two women. The lawsuit cited an independent report from 2018 by accountants Albert Goodman, alleging serious problems in the way the company was run. Quintessentially’s structure was “opaque and complex”, the report said, and it claimed that the group’s directors took “substantial” management fees and “aggressive” dividends from the operating companies. Mingling with Prince Harry at a Coldplay concert is the sort of service that Quintessentially claims it can arrange © Matt Dunham/WPA Pool/Getty The result of the payments had allegedly been to make Quintessentially’s events business “technically insolvent”, according to the report. The lawsuit also cited a recording of a board meeting in February 2019 during which Quintessentially’s directors discussed the possibility of reducing a corporation tax payment, estimated to be £260,000. According to the legal complaint, Mr Elliot, who has cultivated the government as a client, was alleged to have said at the prospect of paying that amount in tax: “We can’t give the fucking thing to the government.” Quintessentially told the Financial Times it “categorically denied” that Mr Elliot made the statement and said it was “simply untrue”. It denied all of the allegations contained in the claim and said the dispute had been “fully resolved”. Mr Elliot declined to be interviewed for this article. Mr Drummond did not provide any comment. The secret to Quintessentially’s success, Mr Elliot has said, is “knowing the right people to contact, for the right favour”. The company was born in 2000 in the shadow of the royal family. After Eton and Bristol University, Mr Elliot was introduced to Mr Simpson, a former film producer, and Mr Drummond, a lawyer, through his cousin, Tom Parker-Bowles, the Duchess of Cornwall’s son. It offers clients “anything you want, anytime you want it, anywhere you want it”, as well as access to exclusive events. Quintessentially’s latest brochure advertises “membership highlights” that have in the past included “access to an intimate charity event with Samantha Cameron at 10 Downing Street”, referring to the wife of the former prime minister, and “a personal invitation to a fundraiser hosted by HRH Prince of Wales at Windsor Castle”. Ever-grander ideas have been dreamt up. In 2017, the company said it was building a 220-metre superyacht that would be the “world’s largest floating private members club for the global elite” — although the yacht has yet to materialise. A past Quintessentially brochure has advertised ‘access to an intimate charity event with Samantha Cameron at 10 Downing Street’ © Luke MacGregor/WPAPool/Getty “He’s a big personality and a big person physically,” says someone who has worked closely with Mr Elliot. “He’s an impressive person to talk to and he’s good with clients. His challenge was managing people and working with staff, he has an abrupt manner.” Quintessentially made a loss of £833,000 in its first year, but grew rapidly to more than 1,000 staff and 30 subsidiary companies that have included an art dealership, a florist, an estate agency and a chauffeur service. From its roots reserving top restaurants and booking theatre tickets for individual members, the company has tried to branch out in different areas — signing up corporate clients and opening its contacts book for the British government. Since 2016, the department for international trade has paid Quintessentially £1.4m to introduce Whitehall officials to high-net worth individuals so they can “network at the highest levels”, according to a contract seen by the FT. Quintessentially arranges “exceptional visits” for civil servants to meet high-net worth individuals and convince them to invest in the UK, according to the contract. Quintessentially has also looked to corporate customers to fuel growth. One former senior employee says the majority of the 160,000 customers the company claims to have came through corporate contracts. Quintessentially has disputed this but declined to provide the breakdown of members. Several people close to the business say that a model tailored to individual needs sometimes suffered when applied on a larger scale. HSBC, which offered Quintessentially’s services to its wealthy Jade account holders, and British Airways, which partnered with the company to promote its services in the first class lounge at Heathrow airport, did not renew their contracts in 2018. One person who has worked with Ben Elliot says: ‘He’s a big personality and a big person physically’ © ITV/Shutterstock HSBC said the bank had reviewed its relationship with Quintessentially and decided to move to a different provider after just 12 months. Quintessentially says the BA and HSBC contracts were not renewed for “specific business reasons . . . unrelated to customer service or feedback”, pointing to a redesign of the airport facilities and a shift in strategy at the bank. Other members have expressed disappointment. A publicist from Chicago told the FT she was offered three tiers of membership that started at $8,500 a year and rose to $40,000 for “Quintessence” — a 13-month invite-only subscription that included dinner at Buckingham Palace, VIP packages to the Sundance and Cannes film festivals, and a tennis tournament with Richard Branson on his private Caribbean island. She signed up for its “bespoke elite” membership, which cost $21,000 per year. It promised 24-hour global access to a personal “lifestyle manager” who would organise “travel, VIP event access, exclusive dinners, top hotel access, hard to get restaurant reservations” and more, according to emails seen by the Financial Times. But the publicist did not feel it was value for money. “They promised anything, but . . . I ended up paying for one restaurant reservation and a PDF guide to London telling me to shop at Harrods.” Quintessentially says it has an 88 per cent renewal rate for customers, and that its internal monitoring system for member satisfaction shows a “net promoter score of nine out of 10”. It provided the names of three customers who were willing to share positive experiences about the company. One of them, a well-known City businesswoman who did not want to be named, says she knew Mr Elliot before becoming a client and now pays “hundreds of pounds” a month as a retainer for Quintessentially services. The company had helped her find a house and move her family from Scotland to London, as well as finding hotel rooms and a tutor for her child. “They got everything set up, got us a discount and even stocked the fridge,” she says. Quintessentially prides itself on an ability to plan meticulously extravagant events — it claims to have helped a Saudi member host a party for 300 guests at the Pyramids in Egypt. But several insiders say it has struggled to manage its own complicated empire of subsidiary businesses. In 2015, according to several people familiar with the situation, Quintessentially talked to WPP about selling itself to the advertising group. A person close to WPP says the potential deal was called off at an early stage: “It was [like] a rabbit warren.” In 2018 the founders launched a restructuring of the company’s web of businesses to consolidate dozens of subsidiaries under group control. This meant rolling about 30 of its subsidiaries, whose management teams held significant equity interests, into the group company, Quintessentially UK. The legal claim brought against Quintessentially last year was linked to that restructuring. The petition was issued by Anabel Fielding and Caroline Villamizar-Duque, co-founders of Quintessentially Media, an events business that has organised parties for clients including the Prince of Wales and Facebook. The two women argued the shake-up unfairly devalued their stakes in the company. The claim also alleged that Mr Elliot and his two co-founders supervised the movement of money between UK and overseas subsidiaries in a series of loans, share transactions and dividends to help fund the group. At one stage, cash flow difficulties left the group unable to pay its staff, the claim alleged. “Due to a large payment, Q group has insufficient funds to make payroll this month (which would obviously [be] negative for the Quintessentially brand),” Mr Drummond said in an email to Ms Fielding and Ms Villamizar-Duque in November 2018, in which he requested their events business provide funds to support the group, according to their claim. It also said a dividend paid to the founders from Quintessentially Events “took the company very substantially into a deficit” of £602,000 in 2017. Citing the report by the external accountants, the claim said that the dividend “could be deemed to be illegal”. Quintessentially chief executive Annastasia Seebohm says: ‘The culture here is so far from macho’ © Dimitrios Kambouris/amfAR/WireImage/Getty The company disputes all of the allegations contained in the claim and says the matter has been “fully resolved”. It adds: “Any suggestion that the directors of Quintessentially UK have breached their fiduciary duties and/or they have failed to act in the best interests of the company are vehemently denied.” Quintessentially settled the claim out of court. The resulting restructuring of the group left two charges over its assets that gave Ms Fielding and Ms Villamizar-Duque rights to equity in the group, according to people briefed on the matter and filings at Companies House. Quintessentially UK Ltd — the holding company before the recent reorganisation — recorded a £3.1m loss in the latest available accounts and a £1.8m fall in revenue to £23.1m in the 12 months to May 2018. It blamed the drop in revenue on pulled corporate contracts and bad debts related to a customer that went bust. In 2017, the company made a loss of £2.8m, after a £359,000 profit the previous year. The pressures on the business have made its headquarters near London’s Regent’s Park a sometimes turbulent place, according to several former employees. They have criticised the company’s leadership in interviews with the FT, citing a high turnover of staff, dissatisfaction over levels of pay and tirades by some of its directors. In a typo-strewn email sent by Mr Simpson in 2018 to the heads of Quintessentially’s subsidiaries, cited in the claim brought by Ms Fielding and Ms Villamizar-Duque, he wrote: “Anyone whop questions any decisions I am not making and doesn’t act on what I am saying is immediately fired for gross misconduct.” He added: “I am not FIGHTING OVER ANY OF THIS. You listen to what I say and you act on it for the greater good of all in this company. I don’t wasn’t any decision queries. I will be responsible for any mistakes I make, no you. Reply that I have full agreement and that you understand what I am saying.” “There was so much masculine bravado at the top of the organisation,” one former staff member recalls. A separate former executive, who reported directly to the founders, says: “The place felt Mad Men-esque, it was old school.” Quintessentially offers members ‘anything you want’ as well as access to exclusive events © Charlie Bibby/FT A third former employee adds: “Ben was a very different figure to the image of him we would read about in the media. Some of us found it quite hard to square the [public image of a] charismatic, charitable Ben with the man who shouted in the office and reduced some younger staff to tears.” However, Annastasia Seebohm, who was appointed in 2018 to run the company, disputes this. “The culture here is so far from macho,” she says, citing her own rapid rise from a business development assistant in the group’s Athens office to global chief executive in under eight years while in her early 30s. She points to the fact that 70 per cent of the group’s senior executive team are women. “Some employees when they leave are disgruntled but we have a wonderful network of former employees that remain very close to the business and a happy team,” Ms Seebohm adds. Mr Elliot’s status in UK politics has continued to rise since the Conservative party’s general election win in December. He was lauded within the party for raising funds for the campaign. This month he retained his role as co-chair of the party, despite a reshuffle in which Mr Johnson replaced his colleague in the same position. Senior executives at Quintessentially insist that Mr Elliot has no problem in managing his public and private sector roles. The company says its next financial results are likely to show a very different picture. Its first global consolidated accounts will be filed before the end of March. Preliminary results showed an 8 per cent growth in revenues to about £80m, the company says, with earnings of £3m before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. Insiders say relationships with big name clients, such as Facebook and Gucci, are growing. “It’s clear that we are in great shape,” says Mr Simpson.